Talk:Postmodernism

I'm not very happy with this article; it really doesn't explain anything about postmodernism. While I don't have time to do anything about that right now, I wil

Talk:Postmodernism

Comment

I'm not very happy with this article; it really doesn't explain anything about postmodernism. While I don't have time to do anything about that right now, I will start working on this soon. I know of some good published sources that I can get information from. in the meantime, I urge anyone who thinks they have a handle on Postmodernism to work on it a little. Scanna (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ironically, this edit, given by an anonymous IP and later reverted by Isis [it actually looked like vandalism, the IP didn't do a good job of placement], perhaps points to the start of a way forward. 'Post modernism is connected with clutter, technology, no absolutes, and self critique.' This is actually a more accurate statement than what the page says now...basis for new start, anyone? Scanna (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removed paragraph

129.78.64.106 added this paragraph. "However, the main theme of Cameron’s analysis of semanticist desublimation is a mythopoetical whole. Lyotard uses the term ‘the neodialectic paradigm of expression’ to denote the role of the reader as writer. Thus, the premise of subdialectic patriarchialist theory implies that reality is a legal fiction. Baudrillard promotes the use of the neodialectic paradigm of expression to deconstruct capitalism." Didn't really seem like it belonged. --Terrible Tim (talk) 00:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.