Talk:Paraphilia

The list given in the article has poor grammar but its main issue is the seemingly-random selection of paraphilias and other terms. Should another section be cr

Paraphilia examples

The list given in the article has poor grammar but its main issue is the seemingly-random selection of paraphilias and other terms. Should another section be created for some examples of paraphilias, or is this not necessary? There's no such section in the enWiki article on paraphilias, but probably only because it has its own article [1].

In addition, fetishism is in the list of terms but it's said in the enWiki article that "there is no broad scientific consensus for definitive boundaries between what are considered "unconventional sexual interests", kinks, fetishes, and paraphilias" - in my opinion, this should be mentioned earlier and they shouldn't simply be lumped into an examples list at the end of the article. Petalpatter (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am quite pessimistic about the prospect of improving these articles as well, when there seems to be a huge shortage of specialised editors who could carry out the work. Steven1991 (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.