Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer security/Members

How you can help:

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer security/Members

Active users?

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Could it be possible to improve this list by listing members that are active and inactive.

Also there's some users which their only contribution was to add their name to the list. Would it be a good idea to remove them from the list or place them as inactive?

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

It's considered impolite (understatement) to remove wikiproject-members without consulting them first, but I don't know what Wikipedia policy is in cases like this. --DanielPharos (talk) 12:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The question is what policy would apply in this case and not to be impolite to users. For users that have made at least one or so contributions, but haven't been inactive for a year or so could be placed on an inactive list. For users whose only contribution is added their name to the list maybe a note on their talk page stating that they'll be removed in two weeks or so may work. As for the Wikipedia policy it might fall under Sock puppetry or Single-purpose account.

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 15:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sock puppetry is a single person using multiple accounts, which doesn't apply in the situation we're talking about. (Sleeper accounts can, but I don't see anybody pretending to be a different user.) Single-purpose accounts might, although there are editors that added themselves to the project having only edited articles outside computer security, for which this policy then doesn't apply.
But I think your basic approach is sound. Can you please propose this idea on the wikiproject's main talk page, so we can gather consensus? (Also, I'd give people four weeks, just to reduce the chance that somebody is on holiday during that entire period.) --DanielPharos (talk) 07:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Daniel. I'll put up a rough draft on the wikproject's main talk page.

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 14:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.