Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abortion/Assessment

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Abortion This page is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Portuguese abortion referendum, 2007 is still rated stub-class; looking at the guidelines I would say its now somewhere between B and GA. Could someone reassess pls? AndrewRT(Talk) 21:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-02T21:22:00.000Z","author":"AndrewRT","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AndrewRT-2007-03-02T21:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-Severa-2007-03-02T23:31:00.000Z-AndrewRT-2007-03-02T21:22:00.000Z"]}}-->

I upped the class from stub to start. The article, in its current form, does not treat the subject in a lot of detail, but it does feature "useful graphic" and "multiple subheadings." -Severa (!!!) 23:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-02T23:31:00.000Z","author":"Severa","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Severa-2007-03-02T23:31:00.000Z-AndrewRT-2007-03-02T21:22:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

WHHLPA merits a B imho. Please reassess? Groupthink 15:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-20T15:44:00.000Z","author":"Groupthink","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Groupthink-2007-05-20T15:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Post-abortion syndrome seems to warrant a B.. please asses Kuronue | Talk 18:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-05T18:06:00.000Z","author":"Kuronue","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kuronue-2007-09-05T18:06:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->