Wikipedia:WikiProject Doctor Who/Goals

The following is a list of [possible] goals that the Doctor Who WikiProject is working towards. If you wish to participate in any of these projects, please add your username (use three tildes ~~~) below the respective header.

Participants

• Garriefisher (talk)

Discussion

Should we also include Dr. Who, the War Doctor, the Fugitive Doctor and/or the Valeyard? Mr Sitcom (talk) 01:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)reply

I'd say yes for War and Fugitive. No strong opinion on the other two. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)reply

I'd say no for all four, there is barely any reliable source saying much about War and Fugitive(even The Doctor only mentions them in other and not the main list), and if they are not included, there would be no point for the other two either, even if they might have reliable sources. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 05:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)reply

Regarding the Fugitive Doctor:

• The Guardian
• IndieWire
• IGN
• Den of Geek
• Radio Times
• People

Regarding the War Doctor:

• The Guardian
• Forbes
• Inverse
• Huffington Post
• The Wrap
• IGN
• Radio Times

The sources exist, it would just take improving the articles. I suppose Martin as Fugitive is more debatable as she was only ever credited as a guest star, but Hurt was credited in the opening sequence of DotD along with Smith and Tennant, meaning he did technically headline the series. If we're including the Eighth Doctor based on that bar, then War should be included as well. I feel less strongly about Dr. Who since he wasn't in the main television series. The Valeyard is up for debate. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)reply

It's not just about appearances though. Most of the coverage for War and Fugitive is that they appeared in a few episodes; War has some audio stories, but Fugitive does not even have that at the moment, and audio stories barely get any coverage as compared to the TV stories, with Eight only getting extensive coverage because he has appeared in so many. Same for the Valeyard as War and Fugitive. We should definitely not include Dr. Who though, even the Shalka Doctor is more related to the story than him. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)reply

I'd say include Fugitive and War, as they are decently notable, but Valeyard and Dr. Who should be excluded. Tbh I'd honestly say those may be liable to AfD due to notability concerns, but I'd have to research that. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)reply

Participants

• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) (1 GA, 1 suptopic)
• SkywalkerEccleston

Discussion

• I have updated the Tom Baker and Colin Baker articles and nominated them to GAN. I also removed Tom Baker's filmography from his article and created List of Tom Baker performances and credits. I am considering doing the same with Colin Baker's filmography, as it is lengthy and not well-cited atm.
  I would appreciate if someone could review what I have written about Tom Baker and Colin Baker's post-Doctor Who career, as it has been challenging to find good quality citations.SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2026 (UTC)reply
• I decided to create it anyway: List of Colin Baker performancesSkywalkerEccleston (talk) 02:10, 26 January 2026 (UTC)reply

  Hey, I'll review Colin's page (Not Tom's as I've worked on it before), but would you by chance be interested in getting the two filmography pages to FLC? Olliefant (she/her) 05:14, 26 January 2026 (UTC)reply

  Thanks @Olliefant. Sure, I would love to get them to FLC, however I would need help. A lot of Tom and Colin's late-career work is not exactly high profile and thus it's difficult to find good-quality citations. I am open to any advice you have regarding this. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 07:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)reply

  @Olliefant I have recently overhauled List of Christopher Eccleston performances. Do you have any advice on what it needs to get to FLC? thanks. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 00:49, 31 March 2026 (UTC)reply

• I have updated Ncuti Gatwa to GAN SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 09:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)reply

  Would you be willing to co nom Tennant at some point? Olliefant (she/her) 07:54, 27 January 2026 (UTC)reply

  Maybe at some point in the future. For now I prefer to focus on the articles for the older Doctor actors. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2026 (UTC)reply

• Christopher Eccleston has been nominated to GAN SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2026 (UTC)reply
• Tom Baker is now GA SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 23:29, 6 June 2026 (UTC)reply
• Peter Davison is nominated to GAN SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2026 (UTC)reply
• Jon Pertwee is nominated to GAN SkywalkerEccleston (talk)

Participants

• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)
• SkywalkerEccleston

Discussion

Participants

• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)
• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)

Discussion

On paper this seems pretty simple, Eccelston is not in bad shape and Mickey needs a plot trim. Interestingly this is my 9500th edit Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)reply

Yeah, I have been looking for sources to improve Eccleston's article. Congratulations on 9500 edits! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)reply

@DoctorWhoFan91 I have been using Eccleston's "Profile" entry in Doctor Who: The Complete History as a source SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2026 (UTC)reply

Christopher Eccleston has been nominated to GAN. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2026 (UTC)reply

Participants

• Pokelego999

Discussion

Would this also include video games starring Smith as the Doctor?

The Adventure Games

Evacuation Earth

Return to Earth

The Mazes of Time

The Eternity Clock

Or any of his other theatrical/television appearances?

Doctor Who Live

The Crash of the Elysium

The Science of Doctor Who

– Rhain ☔ (he/him) 21:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)reply

No strong opinion on this either way, BUT if we're adding those, I feel like we'd also need to consider adding in "The End of Time" and "Deep Breath". I don't feel like the current proposed topic has gaps without them, but if we start including expanded media content, it feels weird to exclude things that are in the source material (even more so with the inclusion of DotD). TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)reply

I considered those too, but I don't think they're necessary as they're essentially cameos (whereas the expanded media and Death of the Doctor are generally much more focused on the Eleventh Doctor). – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 05:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)reply

That's a fair point. Like I said, no strong opinion on any of them. I definitely wouldn't oppose if the expanded media were included and the cameos weren't. I just thought discussion on it may come up at one point or another and it made more sense to decide sooner rather than later. TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)reply

Yeah, I'm not sure I have a very strong opinion about it either, but it crossed my mind with this Doctor in particular—which makes sense considering how much additional content featured Smith compared to the others. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 05:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)reply

A lot of those articles could do with re-evaluation or expansion before being included, but excluding that, I mainly based this on the Twelfth Doctor one below, which only includes major televised content (Including the Class episode). This can definitely be changed but I feel throwing everything the character appeared in wouldn't really be worthwhile and is not necessary to get an expansive topic on a character. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

I figured that's what it was based on, but technically we don't have a precedent for a topic like this so it's still worth discussing. For the sake of completeness, it seems logical to include extended media, since there's nothing about the topic that seems to specifically limit it to television appearances (in which case, some novels may also be within scope). – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 03:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

@Rhain in that case we should probably determine exactly what falls into the scope of the Topic or not, and we'd need to determine what is and isn't notable. Random Novels probably are going to be AfD'd at some point anyway, and minor cameos probably don't need to be incorporated, but something like The Adventure Games I concur could probably do with being added. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

I agree the novel articles are likely eligible for redirection/deletion anyway, but until then they're worth mentioning. I also agree that small cameos are unnecessary, but significant appearances (like the video games) are likely worth including unless we determine the scope is limited to television (which may also be valid). – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 03:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

I'll leave that up to other editors to decide. @OlifanofmrTennant in particular may be interested in this since her Twelfth Doctor goal may be affected by this as well. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

That topic would definitely be impacted less, to be fair, as there's currently only one novel article. There's an argument to be made that Doctor Who: Legacy and possibly Lego Dimensions could qualify, but I'm mostly apathetic there, and the only other possible inclusion is "From the Doctor to My Son Thomas", but that's already FA so no work required. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 06:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

If we were to expand to video games then Legacy is a yes. Dimensions is a hard maybe, while the Doctor does play a supporting role in it's story he isn't the lead. Similar to Wikipedia:Good topics/Hulk video games. As for The Blood Cell, it's prime AFD material Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

I agree: the argument for Lego Dimensions is far weaker, but something to consider. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 06:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

Yeah I'd take any excuse to write about Lego Dimensions Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

(edit conflict) I feel that an argument to exclude them could be found under criteria 1b. "The articles or lists have a clear similarity with each other under a well-defined topical scope." I feel that including novels and video games would be to broad. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

That's certainly fair, though there's an argument to be made that the topic itself is already quite broad (especially per criteria 1(c)). I suppose the scope could be limited specifically to "Eleventh Doctor on television"—not that the topic itself should be named that, but perhaps something to keep in mind when nominating. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 06:47, 28 November 2024 (UTC)reply

Participants

• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)
• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)
• Garriefisher (talk)
• Pokelego999 (talk)
• SkywalkerEccleston (talk)

Discussion

• I have nominated Bill Potts (Doctor Who) and Clara Oswald to GAN. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Discussion

Bit of an oddball this one but not entirely unfeasible. I believe it would just need Tennant and Donna's articles to be improved? Very small but pretty concise in terms of content. If anything else is missing feel free to add it. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 06:38, 30 June 2026 (UTC)reply

Participants

• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)
• Pokelego999 (talk)
• Mr Sitcom (talk)
• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)

Discussion

Maybe with only five spinoff companions vs the 43? TV companions they could be moved to a subtopic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OlifanofmrTennant (talk • contribs) 19:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)reply

• • moved out spin offs Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)reply

Comment I will be using User:Pokelego999/sandbox/WikiProject Doctor Who Fictional Elements Priority Order in order to collect sources regarding any of these characters as I research them. I intend to try and work on improving Mel Bush soon. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 12:57, 9 October 2024 (UTC)reply

• Yasmin Khan (Doctor Who) is nominated to GAN. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 17:00, 15 June 2026 (UTC)reply
• Bill Potts (Doctor Who) is nominated to GAN. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 14:37, 6 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Participants

• Pokelego999 (talk)

Discussion

Surely the Doctor should be included on here as opposed to the Valeyard? Olliefant (she/her) 01:21, 15 July 2025 (UTC)reply

@OlifanofmrTennant I'm honestly considering axing the individual Time Lords as a whole since they're individual characters as opposed to species or particular monsters, but I'm admittedly not too sure. There's also the issue of there being so many incarnations of the Doctor that they're practically a separate topic at this point. I'd appreciate some input if I'm being honest. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:29, 15 July 2025 (UTC)reply

I don’t think an individual character should be included here since it’s about Doctor Who species, so time lord but not The Rani. Daleks but not Davros. A timelord topic would include The Rani and The Master and ect Olliefant (she/her) 07:29, 15 July 2025 (UTC)reply

Sounds good. I'll axe out the individual Time Lords, Davros, and the Mara since they're all particular individuals, but the others will remain. I'll start another subtopic for the Time Lords in a second. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:30, 16 July 2025 (UTC)reply

Participants

• Pokelego999 (talk)

Discussion

I'm not including the separate incarnations of the Doctor on here since that'll be its own subtopic, however I will not submit this until all the Doctor incarnations are done and dusted. For now I'm just including the Valeyard separately given his unique separation from other Doctor incarnations, but I'll likely adjust that later down the line. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:34, 16 July 2025 (UTC)reply

Discussion

@Pokelego999: would something like this be viable? Olliefant (she/her) 18:09, 17 February 2026 (UTC)reply

@Olliefant very likely. However, I would also argue Robert Banks Stewart should be included given he is their creator. While other people who worked with the species have only done so tangentially, I feel their creator is a pretty notable exclusion if we're covering everything Zygon related here.

For the rest of the articles I'd be happy to collaborate on finishing them; perhaps each of us cover one part each of Invasion/Inversion, and we collaborate to complete The Day of the Doctor (Given it's an incredibly massive article in terms of scope)? Day of the Doctor's completion would also be very helpful for the 2013 specials sub-topic. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:20, 17 February 2026 (UTC)reply

Sure, I'll take Inversion and then we could trade GA reviews? Olliefant (she/her) 18:32, 17 February 2026 (UTC)reply

I'd be unopposed. Just a question though: A lot of developmental information is shared between the two parts. Does the bulk of that info go to the first part, get split between both, or something else? I have admittedly not worked with these kinds of multi-part stories before. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:57, 17 February 2026 (UTC)reply

Pinging @Olliefant just to clarify Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:09, 19 February 2026 (UTC)reply

If there is too much overlap, they could be merged. There is precedent for this ("whoami and Hello, Elliot", "Finn the Human and Jake the Dog", "Hogcock! and Last Lunch" to name a few) But these are usually reserved for things that were filmed together, which I don't think these were Olliefant (she/her) 02:53, 19 February 2026 (UTC)reply

I'll just include what I can and work from there, I suppose.

Also, I am beginning some work on Banks Stewart's article. I will let you know once I have a draft together. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:16, 19 February 2026 (UTC)reply

FWIW, these episodes were definitely made together—they shared a production block and director, and filming took place over the course of a month without any breaks, besides some weekends (in fact, the first day of production included scenes from the second episode, while the last day had scenes from the first). That being said, these should be fine as two separate articles; the first may inevitably have more 'development' info, but the second can mostly recap where relevant. We have many different GA+ examples of two-part stories (and some halves) if you need any inspiration. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 05:00, 19 February 2026 (UTC)reply

Robert Banks Stewart is now GA, which brings us one article closer to our goal.

@SkywalkerEccleston I notice you've been doing some major edits to The Day of the Doctor recently; do you plan to take that one to GA? Me and Ollie already are taking on the other two Zygon episodes, so the improvement of that last article would be very helpful (Though I understand it's a very large article, and I'd definitely be willing to take on sections of it if need be) Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:36, 1 April 2026 (UTC)reply

@Pokelego999 Yes, I can take on Day of the Doctor. I will let you know if there are any sections that might be an issue. Of course feel free to jump in and make changes at any point. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2026 (UTC)reply

Thank you! Sounds good. Best of luck and I am always happy to be of assistance wherever needed! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:09, 1 April 2026 (UTC)reply

The Day of the Doctor is now at GAN SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 00:33, 18 May 2026 (UTC)reply

@Olliefant The Zygon Invasion is now up for GAN. I mostly focused on the overall story conception here, since a lot of the major analysis of this story is focused on Inversion, particularly in the form of the Doctor's speech. I did find this while source searching that may be helpful, [1], and I'd check out Books/Scholar for anlaysis of this two-parter to see what you can incorporate into Inversion. Let me know if you have any queries regarding this or how content should be split between the two articles. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)reply

Discussion

Another monster GT that's very close to completion. All that really needs to be hit up are Village and The Lost. Admittedly unsure if Halloween Apocalypse, Once, Upon Time, and Survivors of the Flux should be included though, since while they do include Angels they are not the main episode focus. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:31, 20 February 2026 (UTC)reply

Template talk:Weeping Angel stories lists them as major appearences Olliefant (she/her) 03:46, 20 February 2026 (UTC)reply

I've added them; seems like once the individual Flux episodes are completed this will be too, pretty much, given they're in all but War of the Sontarans and The Vanquishers. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 06:42, 20 February 2026 (UTC)reply

Discussion

Another close one, really only missing Time of the Doctor. I believe that's all the Silent stories anyway, unless there are obvious ones I'm missing. Could be a potential one to hit up at some point (Also for the 2013 specials GT, since Day will be worked on for the Zygon one). Not a pressing topic but definitely one to keep in mind for future reference. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:31, 20 February 2026 (UTC)reply

Cyberman GT I am setting up right now. This is very much long term but since there has been some interest expressed in this in the past I figured I'd set it up for later use.

Will note that while Army of Ghosts is a GA, it's very outdated and has a banner on it. Will need some work if its status is to be maintained. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 23:58, 28 February 2026 (UTC)reply

• I am currently working on Nicholas Briggs. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 12:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC)reply

I've been away for a few days, but one I can return to editing would be interesting in working on the lead item? Olliefant (she/her) 00:19, 15 March 2026 (UTC)reply

@Olliefant Cyberman is on my to-do list, though admittedly my focus has been on some other articles lately. I've got a draft started at User:Pokelego999/sandbox/Cyberman Rewrite, though I haven't done a lot of extensive work on it yet, so it's missing a good chunk (And a lot of the writing is admittedly very old). I do have all the sources I've gathered listed there though. I plan to hit this one up at some point once I get some more articles out of the way, especially since it's currently the last major species article not at GA or above or nominated for that as of right now. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:48, 15 March 2026 (UTC)reply

Any recommendations for sources about the "Wilderness Years" or the Audio Visuals, for use in the Nicholas Briggs article? SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 02:17, 27 March 2026 (UTC)reply

@SkywalkerEccleston I use several in the "Audio Visuals and Big Finish Productions" sub-section in Doctor Who audio productions, which is pre-dominantly focused on the Audio Visuals and Big Finish's founding. There's likely more out there but that might be a good start. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:19, 27 March 2026 (UTC)reply

Thanks. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 07:43, 27 March 2026 (UTC)reply

I have updated Nicholas Briggs; would anyone be open to reviewing my work and suggesting how it could be improved before I nominate it to GAN? I feel it still needs work done. Thanks, I would appreciate it. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2026 (UTC)reply

I don't think I have directly mentioned this on wiki (although I have in the discord), I'm working on The Invasion (Doctor Who). Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 19:26, 25 May 2026 (UTC)reply

Only four Classic stories are not GA, GAN, or ready for nomination (Revenge of the Cybermen, Earthshock, Five Doctors, Silver Nemesis). Honestly impressive progress that's been made so far. Excellent work so far and congratulations to everyone who has improved articles! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:44, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

Participants

Glimmer721

Rhain ☔ (he/him)

Discussion

Participants

• Glimmer721
• Rhain ☔ (he/him)
• SkywalkerEccleston

Discussion

I have significantly improved The Power of the Daleks and am working on The Moonbase. Glimmer721 (talk) 00:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)reply

Report: Power of the Daleks I want some advice on how detailed that home media release section should be; The Moonbase has all the information I could find so far and mostly needs plot cleanup. Glimmer721 (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2024 (UTC)reply

@Glimmer721 I'd check how much of the information there can even be cited. I think it's likely good as it is, but it needs citations to be verifiable.

I did a plot rewrite for The Moonbase to help out with that, and it now manages to squeeze under the 400 word episode limit. I'd do some more prose rewrites in spots, as there's still a lot of opinionated language in places. I'd also split the large Reception paragraph into two. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)reply

Thanks! I have reclassified the Moonbase to B. Glimmer721 (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)reply

I have now cleaned up and nominated Moonbase to GAN! Glimmer721 (talk) 03:17, 9 January 2026 (UTC)reply

Participants

• Glimmer721
• User:Pokelego999
• SkywalkerEccleston

Discussion

@SkywalkerEccleston: @Glimmer721: Thanks to the recent work on the two Yeti serials, as well as Skywalker's work on The Wheel in Space, season 5 has made some significant progress on it. Glimmer, I've seen your work on The Enemy of the World recently (Looking good so far), and it made me wonder: Would it be possible, perhaps, for all three of us to collaborate to finish this GT?

Following The Enemy of the World's nomination, all that would be left to work on are The Tomb of the Cybermen, The Ice Warriors, and Fury from the Deep, and then the season article. If all three of us were to work on this together, assuming Glimmer works on Enemy (Which I am also willing to help with, if needed/wanted), that would be one serial per person, followed by a collaborative effort to work on the overall season article. This definitely seems like a pretty plausible good topic to be able to finish, if you all would be interested in partaking in it.

Obviously fine if not, and additionally it would definitely be possible to work on at a later date if needed, but I figured I'd shoot the suggestion out there given our numbers. Please let me know what you think! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:55, 16 January 2026 (UTC)reply

Hi User:Pokelego999, thanks for the idea. Could I take Fury from the Deep to work on? SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 01:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)reply

I don't see why not. For my part I'm happy to work on either of the other two (I can re-use some of my Ice Warrior content on The Ice Warriors, and for Tomb it's a big article and I happen to have some good dev info pieces in a primary source Cybermen guide). Depends what Glimmer would prefer to take, if they wish to participate. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:20, 19 January 2026 (UTC)reply

I'm cool with working on Enemy and did quite a bit already, I just am not on every day FYI! February also might be a busy time for me. Glimmer721 (talk) 01:42, 20 January 2026 (UTC)reply

No worries! This doesn't need to be instantaneous, so long as it gets done in the end. :) Take your time, and thank you for your work! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:21, 20 January 2026 (UTC)reply

Fury is now GAN SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 03:01, 30 January 2026 (UTC)reply

@SkywalkerEccleston Fantastic work! Article looks very solid at a glance.

For my part I've gathered some sources for The Tomb of the Cybermen and hope to get started on that at some point soon. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:32, 30 January 2026 (UTC)reply

Thanks @Pokelego999, and thank you for rewriting the plot to be below 400 words. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 03:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)reply

I have nominated Tomb for GAN. Now all that's left to be taken on is The Ice Warriors. I am fine to take this on at a later date once some other projects are finished, but otherwise if either of you want to take it on instead let me know. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 09:44, 31 January 2026 (UTC)reply

Fury from the Deep is now GA! SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2026 (UTC)reply

I will likely be working on The Ice Warriors as my next project. Once that is done I will likely attempt to start tackling the wider Season 5 article. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:21, 20 March 2026 (UTC)reply

The Ice Warriors is currently up for GAN. I have a few projects I intend to hit up next (Namely The Zygon Invasion) so I'll see when I get around to Season 5's article. Right now all that is left individual story-wise is The Enemy of the World. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:52, 3 April 2026 (UTC)reply

I'll review Ice Warriors and then I'll focus on Zygon Inversion Olliefant (she/her) 06:15, 3 April 2026 (UTC)reply

Participants

• Glimmer721
• SkywalkerEccleston

Discussion

• I did Genesis a looooong time ago, but the others have a lot of promise, too. Particularly Robot. Glimmer721 (talk) 02:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)reply
• I'm going to give The Ark in Space a go. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 13:03, 13 March 2026 (UTC)reply

Participants

• OlifanofmrTennant
• Glimmer721
• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)

Discussion

Participants

• User:Glimmer721

Discussion

I have been working through adding reception to these. Enlightenment was done in 2013 and could be udpated to be more in-line with our current GAs in terms of format and there's also a ^{[citation needed]}. Glimmer721 (talk) 03:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)reply

Participants

• OlifanofmrTennant

Discussion

Participants

• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)
• Glimmer732 (talk)

Discussion

Participants

• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)
• TheDoctorWho (talk)
• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)
• Garriefisher (talk)

Discussion

This YouTube channel has a number of full-length Confidential episodes, you may find it useful for earlier series number topics, there's a playlist specifically for series 4. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)reply

@DoctorWhoFan91: Would you by any chance be interested in co-noming Journey's End? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)reply

Yeah, sure, though it does need a lot of work. The DWM edition for series 4 has the finale at 20 pages, so it will take some time to make all the changes to "production". DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:02, 26 November 2024 (UTC)reply

Participants

• Alex 21 (1 GA)
• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)
• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)
• Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk)
• SkywalkerEccleston

Discussion

If this were to be completed ALL Matt Smith episodes would be GA. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)reply

The temptation to do work on Day of the Doctor despite the fact I'm busy already is very strong. Might try doing Night of the Doctor though given that article is relatively short and seems easy enough to improve. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)reply

Participants

• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)
• TheDoctorWho (talk)
• Glimmer721
• Garriefisher (talk)

Discussion

Participants

• TheDoctorWho (talk)
• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)
• Garriefisher (talk)

Discussion

Dare we say there's an endless number of topics to work towards? A subtopic specifically for missing Doctor Who episodes may be another possible one. TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)reply

Anyone has any ideas to how we can promote 2005-present to FL? I tried making it like that of the classic era, but that list's FL is so ancient, it would probably end up demoted too instead^[Joke]. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)reply

Presumably like a standerd episode list, though you do raise a good point with the classic episodes. It may be worth delegating sometime to sprusing it up a bit Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)reply

I don't see it being that difficult to get promoted. Making sure sourcing is up to par, including phasing out Doctor Who News where possible, is something that needs addressed, I might also suggest a slight overhaul of the lead, it's very generalized and about the programme as a whole, containing very little information about Doctor Who since 2005 itself, which I could see being a potential critique.

Perhaps we could start with the 2005 list, get it up to current FL standards, and then reverse model it back to the classic era to ensure that both are where they should be. TheDoctorWho (talk) 20:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)reply

Participants

• TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)reply
• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)

Discussion

Participants

• TheDoctorWho (talk)
• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)
• Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk)
• DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)
• Glimmer721
• Garriefisher (talk)

Discussion

I have re-classified The Husbands of River Song as B-class. I know I need to get my act together to nominate it but I'm just stuck on how to make the plot summary smaller... Glimmer721 (talk) 00:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)reply

@Glimmer721: I was planning to lend a hand and shorten it for you but Rhain and DoctorWhoFan have gotten it down to 391 Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)reply

Thanks so much! I think some sourcing needs to be fixed but otherwise, it's almost nomination ready?? (I haven't done this in like 10 years lol) Glimmer721 (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)reply

I checked the article, and it does look nom-ready (the sourcing can definitely be better though). Great work, I think you should nom it. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)reply

I fixed the sourcing best I could! I think I will wait until next week because I am busy this week, but yay! Glimmer721 (talk) 16:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)reply

@Glimmer721: I think you forgot to nominate it. Also, I'm working on "Last Christmas", in case you are looking for another article to help nominate. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)reply

Yeah, I got busy again...I'm more available next week? I'm just afraid of being away for a couple of days at a time. Perhaps co-nominating is best? Glimmer721 (talk) 03:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)reply

Update: I nominated it! Sorry about the delay. It seems like there is a backlog anyway. Glimmer721 (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)reply

Obligatory post here because my GAN got flagged because I was inactive. Glimmer721 (talk) 19:11, 31 December 2024 (UTC)reply

The nominator inactive goes away as long as you edit atleast once in the last three weeks, so that note us gone now. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)reply

I'm nearly ready to nominate The Return of Doctor Mysterio for GA so completing this topic is somewhat feasable Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)reply