Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Shortcuts WP:WPMWP:WPM WP:WPMATHWP:WPMATH WP:WPMATHSWP:WPMATHS The tesseract, the four-dimensional analog of the cube. To see an animated version, click...
Click to read more »WP:WPM is the WikiProject Mathematics, a Wikimedia subject-area collaboration. It may also refer to: Wikipedia:WikiProject Music Wikipedia:WikiProject...
Click to read more »Marketing (WPM). The company was a scam, taking up to $400,000 from any hopeful inventor it could hook, while providing few if any services to them. WPM was...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:WPM/RRWP:WPM/RR This page collects helpful resources — Web sites, books, journals, and so on — to assist in writing good mathematics articles...
Click to read more »Why do you say 'that can type up to at least 70 wpm'? Why not 'that can type at least 70 wpm'? 'up to' seems to be residual. 217.168.4.171 (talk) 01:37...
Click to read more »(20090605-1944-[WPM] Tymek subscribed.eml) 2009-06-08. Jacurek joins. (20090608-2054-[WPM] Jacurek joining.eml) 2009-06-11. Ostap R joins. (20090611-2032-[WPM] Ostap...
Click to read more »them all? I read at 300 WPM, and Senator William Proxmire claimed to be able to speed read at over 1,000 WPM (or was it 25,000 WPM?). What's the current...
Click to read more »evidenced by the frequent use of terms such as "our cabal". In 20090803-2153-[WPM] HELP!! Radek _ Piotrus_ Tymek and others. Dc76 states the main purpose of...
Click to read more »Re: [WPM] PasswordUsername edit warring, 20090814-0455 Piotrus presents an AFD to the closed mailing list, violating WP:CANVASSING: In Re: [WPM] AfD of...
Click to read more »Marketing (WPM). The company was a scam, taking up to $400,000 from any hopeful inventor it could hook, while providing few if any services to them. WPM was...
Click to read more »reading rate for adults in English is 238 words per minute (wpm) for non-fiction and 260 wpm for fiction. The difference can be predicted by taking into...
Click to read more »Wikipedia/Wikipedia Purchase Management/goals Help:Buying Wikipedia/User WPM Module:User:Varmkorv_Tva/Buying_Wikipedia Help:Section 348 B-27a of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »direction of not writing about oneself. He also "pertains" a typing speed of 135 wpm. Please join me in wishing a fond bye-bye to Our Ricky. - Lucky 6.9 07:15...
Click to read more »Morse Code at 13 WPM "Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." sent as Morse Code at 13 WPM. RTTY "Welcome to Wikipedia, the...
Click to read more »and appears to be a neologism. (This has been discussed at Wikipedia_talk:WPM#Montante.27s_method.) Jakob.scholbach (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »below. Improving polyhedron articles by removing excessive tables per WT:WPM. Add 3D models to all polyhedron articles, including the uniform polyhedra...
Click to read more »diffs support the aforementioned concerns as follows: On Nov 7, 2018 the “WPM news" was added and rewritten in the Whitaker BLP - it is not in any of the...
Click to read more »July 2018 (UTC) @Lordofdominion: FYI, for requests like this, I think WT:WPM is a better place to ask. There are a good number of people who regularly...
Click to read more »examples --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC) I think WT:WPM might be a better place to bring this up, but since we're here, it's hard...
Click to read more »overhead, as explained at WikiProject Council/Guide/Task forces. In particular, WPM has an excellent assessment framework and it would be quite a bit of work...
Click to read more »02:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC) A better place to pose this question would beWT:WPM. --2601:142:3:F83A:8985:D0DD:B024:F94C (talk) 11:48, 3 July 2018 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »(UTC) Just as an aside, I think this discussion more properly belongs on WT:WPM. I haven't given it a whole lot of thought, but what Lambiam said seems reasonable...
Click to read more »open a discussion on the talk page of the article with a notification to WT:WPM. In the opening post, you must summarize the changes you intend to do, explain...
Click to read more »in the way WPM manages the articles under its scope, then this is the wrong forum for that discussion. The correct place would be WT:WPM, and the role...
Click to read more »notable, it should still be treated within the main article, according to WPM. DGG ( talk ) 21:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Stanford (talk) 22:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Preliminary comment: In WT:WPM#Linear recurrence relations there was a consensus for merging this article...
Click to read more »on deletion as well, per Gandalf. I'm going to post a proposal over at WT:WPM to see if there is any interest in revising List of curves. Sławomir Biały...
Click to read more »| links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: Https://www.typesy.com/what-wpm-is-considered-a-slow-and-fast-typing-speed/&action=edit&redlink=1 (R/Xmeta/L-...
Click to read more »blacklist, error: Trailing \ in regex m/\/ at LinkSaver.pl line 5540. AdamWPM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · Edit filter search ·...
Click to read more »it out a bit more. Looie496 (talk) 03:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC) You could also talk to the nice people at WP:WPM |Aacehm| 18:13, 2 October 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »merge and redirect. --Ezeu 07:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Should probably go to WPM and add a note about chars per second. Merge and redirect. M1ss1ontomars2k4...
Click to read more »blacklist, error: Trailing \ in regex m/\/ at LinkSaver.pl line 5540. AdamWPM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · Edit filter search ·...
Click to read more »way one can identify how many wpm he/she types?i got some sw online some put me at 36 wpm others 27 wpm others 32 wpm.am not disputing anything but how...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Redirect to set-builder notation or delete per discussion on WT:WPM. —David Eppstein 23:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Delete and do not redirect No...
Click to read more »Warfare in Medieval Scotland Paisley Abbey Interior East Please add {{User WPMS}} to your user box. Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk); interested in most topics...
Click to read more »minutes after I replied to the nominator's query about the sequence on WT:WPM providing these references and requesting that the nominator perform WP:BEFORE...
Click to read more »on an mathematician that apparently fails WP:PROF, see discussion at WT:WPM. It was deprodded by an IP without any commentary or improvement. Pcap ping...
Click to read more »anything Shin developed. Finally, the claim that students are reading 1,000 wpm w/ good reading comprehension is almost certainly utter pseudoscience garbage...
Click to read more »non-profit corporation created to promote medical content on Wikipedia, WPM contains over a dozen different initiatives aimed at adding and improving...
Click to read more »future, this would probably be better at Help Talk:Displaying a formula or WT:WPM. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks for...
Click to read more »invertible for k > n {\displaystyle k>n} . For the previous discussion, see WT:WPM#Weak n-category where all morphisms of a certain dimension or higher are...
Click to read more »the day I install said extension.) I also wonder my average and highest WPM, and other vital typing stats. Is there an extension that does what I ask...
Click to read more »trivial mathematical WP:DICTDEF. Agreed to delete in this discussion at WT:WPM but deprodded by an uninvolved admin. So here we go by the book. Pcap ping...
Click to read more »MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale. Shortcut: WP:WPM/CA...
Click to read more »history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] Wikipedia:WPMWikipedia:WPM → Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics (talk · links · history ·...
Click to read more »exhibition and the problem of arranging images had already been discussed in WT:WPM. Also, many related articles on those tables, I suppose, does not have any...
Click to read more »mainly for tagging articles as within the purview of different projects. WPM already has a bot that does this, with no need for templates. So an additional...
Click to read more »salt, only in case of repeated recreation though, see also Wikipedia_talk:WPM#Maths_Short_Cuts. CenariumTalk 15:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC) Delete. Agree with...
Click to read more »3 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. It's good that KTo288 asked for help at WT:WPM (I came from there), but his/her reasoning is completely wrong. No expert...
Click to read more »grations/partners/airpatrol.html http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AirPatrol-WPM-2-0-Now-iw-2361970044.html http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/4/prweb10649113...
Click to read more »article to take over an hour to read at 250 wpm or for the 269 kb John McCain to take almost an hour? (At 250 wpm it would take 45 minutes to read Huey Long...
Click to read more »history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] In the discussion at WPM (permanent link ), there seems to be a consensus that there is nothing called...
Click to read more »30 June 2010 (UTC) There is some discussion leading up to this AfD at WT:WPM#Another vanity page? Dmcq (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »(UTC) For future reference, this question should probably be asked at WT:WPM. --RDBury (talk) 04:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC) @Lambiam, thank you! @RDBury...
Click to read more »have called this a "personal attack", but it's a transparent attack on WP:WPM. Gregbard would like to use mathematics articles as his personal playground...
Click to read more »refdesk — might have made more sense on WT:WPM. --Trovatore (talk) 05:44, 23 September 2011 (UTC) WT:WPM is for discussing what ought to be done with...
Click to read more »Editing Wikipedia Evaluating Wikipedia All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: Medicine WPM Popular pages WikiProject Medicine Alternative...
Click to read more »11:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC) I'm pretty sure this discussion should be on WT:WPM. It sounds, without researching the subject, like it would have been better...
Click to read more »· b} 20:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom and discussions at WT:WPM#Approximate inequality, and Talk:Inequality (mathematics)/Archive 1#U+2A85...
Click to read more »Editing Wikipedia Evaluating Wikipedia All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: Medicine WPM Popular pages WikiProject Medicine Alternative...
Click to read more »article provides no sources to establish notability, and apparently nobody on WPM has ever heard of it before, either. The citation provided by Deor above...
Click to read more »creation. I think they could all be merged into Askey scheme, but others on WT:WPM have suggested a more refined system for merging. --Salix alba (talk): 14:58...
Click to read more »— SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC) We already have WP:WPM that may be discussed in the geometry articles per @Jacobolus. As far as...
Click to read more »05:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC) This AfD was just mentioned on WT:WPM; I think the WPM people should be given a chance to respond, rather than cutting off...
Click to read more »Radagast3 (talk) 12:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC) I asked for expert input at WT:WPM around then, precisely because it was clear to me there were issues. Charles...
Click to read more »asked Niemeyerstein to look for some, and I also posted a message at WT:WPM yesterday asking for help, since this article is fundamentally about applied...
Click to read more »treatment. Current article has little worth keeping. I've mention this on WT:WPM. --Salix alba (talk) 12:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Keep and rewrite; the phenomenon...
Click to read more »admins. Particularly Biruitorul's post on "[WPM] More cabal theory" June 6 2009 and Radek's long post at "Re: [WPM] It isn't over" on June 21 2009, the former...
Click to read more »for clerical work. The minimum qualifying speed would have been 50 wpm, with 55 wpm or greater preferred. Marco polo (talk) 13:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC) From...
Click to read more »handwriting Vs. typing.--ThePupil (talk) 02:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC) I can type 50 wpm, but only write about half that. One reason is that I type several hours...
Click to read more »This page (currently under development) is to serve a summary of past discussions on proofs in Wikipedia. It describes the opinions of some of the editors...
Click to read more »Editing Wikipedia Evaluating Wikipedia All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: Medicine WPM Popular pages WikiProject Medicine Alternative...
Click to read more »WP:DELSORT queue because a bot automatically lists relevant articles at WP:WPM/CA. This article isn't automatically considered relevant though. Pcap ping...
Click to read more »additional reverts using his own account. This case has also been discussed at WT:WPM#Strangest edit war I've ever seen. After the edit war is sorted out, closing...
Click to read more »not to be, although this sort of question is probably better raised at WT:WPM. The main reference for the topic is a paper from 2018 which states in its...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC) Delete. I was unsure before, but the WT:WPM discussion convinced me that this is original research. No reliable sources...
Click to read more »reviews and the awards on the site are fake. The speed claims such as "93 wpm in a week" are obviously false. Horrible design from an ergonomic point view...
Click to read more »argument quite clearly. Proposed solutions (such as those discussed at WT:WPM) to "fix" the article are too problematic. There may be a kernel of some...
Click to read more »removed the "Characteristics" section which repeated material about the WPM - here too, I did not insert this material, nor was I at all happy with the...
Click to read more »This is a process for discussing and determining whether mathematics articles should be given A-class status. It can be used for improving and promoting...
Click to read more »page? Robinh 19:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC) The right place for this is WT:WPM. The current situation vis-a-vis proofs is summarized at WP:MSM#Proofs. There's...
Click to read more »--Cybercobra (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC) I added a note to WT:WPM regarding your removal, since it affects many math articles and in case any...
Click to read more »home.wpm.neustar.biz: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »...
Click to read more »WikiProject Musical Theatre Shortcuts: WP:MUSICAL • WP:MUSICALS WP:MT • WP:WPMT General (edit · changes) Main Project Page Article Alerts Article Assessment...
Click to read more »February 2024 (UTC) @TechnoSquirrel69 I'll see if I give a notification from WP:WPM. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 13:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC) Comment: This is an encylopedia;...
Click to read more »maybe bend on this one specifically, but not on the GNG thing in general. 4) WPM 2019 - I disagree that this is WP:MILL. WP:MILL doesn't apply to sources...
Click to read more »always welcome. Compiled by Tilman Bayer From the abstract: "We found that WPM [WikiProject Medicine] articles are longer, possess a greater density of...
Click to read more »Editing Wikipedia Evaluating Wikipedia All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: Medicine WPM Popular pages WikiProject Medicine Alternative...
Click to read more »What is this all about? The aim of this sub-project is to assess mathematics articles for their quality and importance (or priority), and to classify them...
Click to read more »(talk to me) 02:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC) I agree that the discussion on WT:WPM was less neutral than I think appropriate, but it's natural that someone...
Click to read more »illustrated with pictures. Also, this would be just the third current FL of WP:WPM. I combined portions of List of perfect numbers (now histmerged into this...
Click to read more »(Talk) 09:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC) Why isn't it a shared task force between WPMS and WPVG? Xbox is an MS product. (many TFs are shared between multiple wikiprojects...
Click to read more »reason, not sure if it matters. If you think any Wikiproject (say, WP:CSB, WP:WPM, or WP:PHILO) should be notified of this, please notify them. Professor Proof...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Does anyone think that the mathematics reference desk (or WP:WPM) should have a "recommended" reading list for mathematics topics. We already...
Click to read more »art, as suggested by User:Radagast3, might be another possibility. At WT:WPM#Promotional essay articles prodded, I had suggested a transwiki, although...
Click to read more »discussion is probably WT:WPM, but I don't have the energy to take it there. Algebraist 21:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Posted at WT:WPM#Point-set conditions for...
Click to read more »comprehensive content is the only thing I'm worried about so far. You may ask at WT:WPM for some help. In the meantime, @Jacobolus actually gave me a good suggestion...
Click to read more »it's a brand-new stub, whose creator has requested help expanding it at WT:WPM, and that there hasn't yet been time for that expansion to happen yet. Got...
Click to read more »time_continue=291&=&v=7JbVdtR2ACc Editing Wikipedia, pages 1–5 Evaluating Wikipedia All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: Medicine https://en...
Click to read more »time_continue=291&=&v=7JbVdtR2ACc Editing Wikipedia, pages 1–5 Evaluating Wikipedia All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: Medicine https://en...
Click to read more »the Best Blog on the 'net,' into something that is just bearly usuable? WPM! Italian contributions to music Grief with pipes in my signature 2 last changes...
Click to read more »Uncertainty theory is notable or not. There has been a nuanced discussion at WT:WPM#Uncertainty theory. But this isn't just a personal thing. The Uncertainty...
Click to read more »preference. TE failed miserably to read the consensus from the polite folk at WPM. One user there possibly hit the nail on the head though[49]. But for heaven's...
Click to read more », 16. (same as with 8.), 18., 21. (good reference for the symbol of the WPM), 23. (short but very good source), 25. (citation only but Richard Dawkins...
Click to read more »(UTC) The best place to get expert advice on mathematical issues is at WT:WPM. My phrase 'naturally occurring' was not intended to be mathematically precise...
Click to read more »maybe bend on this one specifically, but not on the GNG thing in general. 4) WPM 2019 - I disagree that this is WP:MILL. WP:MILL doesn't apply to sources...
Click to read more »WikiProject Neopaganism instead of Wikiproject Nebraska or Nigeria? Or WP:WPM going to Wikiproject Mathematics instead of Wikiproject Music or Maps? You're...
Click to read more »am an active member of the WikiProject Mathematics (WPM) and that this edit war occurs at WT:WPM. It appears that the content of the reverted edit by...
Click to read more »I've seen equally both DPI, PPI, CPI, WPM, CPM, etc., and dpi, ppi, cpi, wpm, cpm, etc. I read some MoS and searched the web, but could not find something...
Click to read more »maybe bend on this one specifically, but not on the GNG thing in general. 4) WPM 2019 - I disagree that this is WP:MILL. WP:MILL doesn't apply to sources...
Click to read more »details see this section of WT:WPM (permalink). Meanwhile User:MelanieN has put 48 hours of semiprotection on WT:WPM, which should help for the moment...
Click to read more »by Brian J. McCartin is said to be reliable in the given discussion at WT:WPM#A reliable source. Although the publisher is from Hikari Ltd., the author...
Click to read more »2 times 0). Michael Hardy (talk) 16:34, 13 August 2011 (UTC) Copied from WT:WPM.--Salix (talk): 15:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC) From two coastline maps I want...
Click to read more »you remain struggling to find which sources are reliable, you can ask WT:WPM. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 07:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC) Thank you for this advice - I...
Click to read more »maybe bend on this one specifically, but not on the GNG thing in general. 4) WPM 2019 - I disagree that this is WP:MILL. WP:MILL doesn't apply to sources...
Click to read more »is disputed. The sources under discussion are: The WPM's official website. This identifies the WPM's beliefs as naturalistic pantheism, and could possibly...
Click to read more »sensationalistic title "non-Newtonian", see also my detailed comments at WPM. Normally there would be no harm in redirecting this to "multiplicative calculus"...
Click to read more »propietary font Times New Roman. linked pages {{User:SonPraises/ubx/WPM|N}} This user can type N WPM. linked pages {{User:Strdst grl/ubx/badtypist}} This user often...
Click to read more »our encyclopedia. What I'm seeing is a BLP vio, and that all mention of WPM in the BLPs and vice versa should be removed. Further reasons for its failure...
Click to read more »Previously, in WPM (Coecke and Moore (2000)) taught me a statement of coherence condition for adjoint functors. This is sometimes called triangle identities...
Click to read more »particularly those that are not covered by existing projects. Shortcut: {{WPMS}} {{User WP Motorsport}} is the project's standard userbox. {{WikiProject...
Click to read more »away from these drafts (which I support) rather than WPM's past handling of drafts. The relation to WPM is him picking caretakers. — MarkH21 (talk) 23:12...
Click to read more »Resources: Editing Wikipedia, pages 1–5 Evaluating Wikipedia Hemingway App All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: people in medicine...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The 5min-consensus at WP:WPM was that this is WP:OR, despite the cool illustrations. Perhaps someone can...
Click to read more »27 March 2010 (UTC) (OR) I've learned to type both, but nowhere near 120 wpm on either. It usually takes about 20 minutes or so when I switch over for...
Click to read more »Club K6DBG streaming cw server ["CNN Breaking News in Morse (25/21/18/13 wpm)"] (Opening the web page, port 8080, downloads a file to a computer's media...
Click to read more »I think) Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: See WT:WPM#Square pyramidal number Comments: —David Eppstein (talk) 21:01, 11 November...
Click to read more »40 wpm claim is a load of rubbish. Very few trained operators can copy 40 wpm, even under perfect conditions. Almost no one on Earth can send 40 wpm with...
Click to read more »disrupting behavior on several talk pages where series are discussed (WT:WPM#User:Hesselp again and Talk:Cesàro summation#The series corresponding with...
Click to read more »WP:WikiProject Malaysia ; and there's WP:WikiProject Motorsport (which uses {{WPMS}}) ; This unduly focuses on the US topic of Mississippi, which if most state...
Click to read more »July 2025 (UTC) Delete as non-notable. I think WP:OR may also apply. cf. WT:WPM/Archive/2024/Dec § Draft:Codenominator Function. The concept seems to have...
Click to read more »did not check the uncited material on Google, but I did list it at the WT:WPM thread if anyone wants to follow up. Most of his other edits are either trivial...
Click to read more »WOU WOV WOW WOX WOY WOZ WPA WPB WPC WPD WPE WPF WPG WPH WPI WPJ WPK WPL WPM WPN WPO WPP WPQ WPR WPS WPT WPU WPV WPW WPX WPY WPZ WQA WQB WQC WQD WQE WQF...
Click to read more »bleeping. GBT/C 09:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC) I prodded it and left a pointer at WT:WPM. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC) It's now been unprodded...
Click to read more »long running campaign against User:Mathsci. Following a discussion on WT:WPM the user has undergone a change of heart and now wishes to pursue the WP:Standard...
Click to read more »mathematical articles. This category that has never been discussed in WT:WPM. This category is totally useless, as almost all mathematical articles should...
Click to read more »part because there is so much information in my head and I can type fast 80 wpm, it is easy for my fingers to run ahead of my brain, kind of like Marx in...
Click to read more »revert, opened a discussion on this section on the talk page, and asked WT:WPM for help. Three established mathematical editors posted to Talk:Differential...
Click to read more »which he rename green religions and added critical OR comments against the WPM and even the Universal Pantheist Society. He removed all mention of Naturalistic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Massachusetts WP:MASS Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics WP:WPM, WP:WPMATH, WP:WPMATHS Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange...
Click to read more »of radio recommend a speech rate of between 160 and 180 words per minute (wpm). If this rate is considered, only one radio station, BBC, would be within...
Click to read more »10 November 2009 (UTC) PS: The core of the discussion can be found at WT:WPM#Theorem. Hans Adler 10:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC) Pontiff Greg Bard has also...
Click to read more »diffs support the aforementioned concerns as follows: On Nov 7, 2018 the “WPM news" was added and rewritten in the Whitaker BLP - it is not in any of the...
Click to read more »10 November 2009 (UTC) PS: The core of the discussion can be found at WT:WPM#Theorem. Hans Adler 10:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC) Pontiff Greg Bard has also...
Click to read more »might turn into "Jonit hea rmy". This mainly happens when I am up to 120 wpm or more. I can also transpose two pairs of transposed letters. "Join the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Massachusetts WP:MASS Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics WP:WPM, WP:WPMATH, WP:WPMATHS Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange...
Click to read more »15:12, 9 May 2015 (UTC) I second the sock observation. I observed this at WT:WPM based on the duck test. In and of itself, this is not exactly disruptive...
Click to read more »to enter in any type of edit summary (and I'm pretty quick typist, 80-85 WPM)! Check my contrbs and you'll note I've used this tool in past, in good faith...
Click to read more »Resources: Editing Wikipedia, pages 1–5 Evaluating Wikipedia Hemingway App All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: people in medicine...
Click to read more »C&pg=PA2&lpg=PA2&dq=%22First+World+War%22+independence+change+map&sig=cQfWPmNPlCDX9OSsjTduuXFWjGs h. * User is on global Whitelist: botpolicia <-> * (es...
Click to read more »Act Four Morse Code at 13 WPM "Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." sent as Morse Code at 13 WPM. PSK31 "Welcome to Wikipedia...
Click to read more »research suggests that the average typing speed is 32.5 wpm for transcription, and 19.0 wpm for composition, giving us between 22 and 37 seconds just...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Any content issues with that article would best be taken to WT:WPM, where there should be plenty of editors competent to do something about...
Click to read more »ussavia#Response_to_denial_by_Piotrus I make note of "In "20090424-1635-[WPM] GFDL", Biruitoral claims, blazenly, that any accusations that they make...
Click to read more »existing math articles would be at the math wikiproject (specifically WT:WPM). I personally don't think adding tons of those links is a great idea but...
Click to read more »cited a reliable source in any of his contributions. On this aspect see WT:WPM#Probable trolling over at Naive set theory. EdJohnston (talk) 17:25, 9 May...
Click to read more »July 2006 (UTC) Huh? We all know who Salix Alba is; he's a regular on WP:WPM, and is usually considered trustworthy. linas 04:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »concerning that article. The same editor then apparently stalked me to WT:WPM concerning the featured article Euclidean algorithm and subsequently wrecked...
Click to read more »retention dropped to 98%. My normal reading speed is between 500 and 700 wpm, and of course I scan much faster than any of those times. I would appreciate...
Click to read more »all means, if you can engage him in dialogue or some kind of tutoring, on WPM or elsewhere, please do so, otherwise this isn't going to end well. He was...
Click to read more »concerned attention throughout their short career here. Of the current WT:WPM discussions, four concern Xayahrainie's edits (the two on which Xayahrainie...
Click to read more »has been also the subject of many discussions here, at WP:AE, and at WT:WPM; for example, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1045#D...
Click to read more »gained featured status Sounds that gained featured status Morse Code at 13 WPM (15 May) PSK31 (15 May) AMTOR (15 May) MT63 (15 May) OLIVIA 16/500 (15 May)...
Click to read more »wou wov wow wox woy woz wpa wpb wpc wpd wpe wpf wpg wph wpi wpj wpk wpl wpm wpn wpo wpp wpq wpr wps wpt wpu wpv wpw wpx wpy wpz wqa wqb wqc wqd wqe wqf...
Click to read more »August 2012 (UTC) That idea has been discussed — search the archives at WT:WPM for "prerequisites". It never got much traction, I think mostly for "WP is...
Click to read more »22 May 2010 (UTC) When will I be able to get back to what was the BEST? WPM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.242.42.191 (talk) 04:52, 22 May 2010...
Click to read more »discussion from my talk page may also be of interest. (n.b. I came here from WT:WPM.) eviolite (talk) 00:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Oppose as per David Eppstein...
Click to read more »Resources: Editing Wikipedia, pages 1–5 Evaluating Wikipedia Hemingway App All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: people in medicine...
Click to read more »Resources: Editing Wikipedia, pages 1–5 Evaluating Wikipedia Hemingway App All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: people in medicine...
Click to read more »illustrated with pictures. Also, this would be just the third current FL of WP:WPM. I combined portions of List of perfect numbers (now histmerged into this...
Click to read more »difference VE makes, especially for less skilled typists who are in the 45 WPM range and make errors. --Djembayz (talk) 13:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »be computed using the cross product of the two vectors." The people at WT:WPM might be able to help. Meanwhile, check this list of Unicode symbols and...
Click to read more »is worth, I have made my attempt at to the math community here over at Wt:WPM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thenub314 (talk • contribs) {{sisterlinks}}...
Click to read more »about. I invested hours to provide a concise summary of the discussion on WT:WPM; I stated that I can see two different issues and asked the requestor three...
Click to read more »I spend some time writing things for Wikipedia, I write at about 80 – 90 wpm and am just casually jotting things down while I am working on real life...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) These three new article are WP:OR, see WT:WPM#Self-publication on WP? D.Lazard (talk) 13:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Delete-...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:51, 18 December 2009 (UTC) Resolved – I'll put the list at WT:WPM. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:55, 18 December 2009 (UTC) Is there an easy way to...
Click to read more »to learn, and speeds of 38 words per minute (wpm) are possible, compared with 23 wpm for T9 and 20 wpm for multitap, says Howard Gutowitz, Eatoni's boss...
Click to read more »Blur) Help:Buying Wikipedia/Johnathan Secret Help:Buying Wikipedia/User WPM Help:Buying Wikipedia/Wikipedia Purchase Management Help:Buying Wikipedia/Wikipedia...
Click to read more »expert on the physics) because of a request from the principal editor at WT:WPM. In my corner of the world, the AdS/CFT correspondence is typically associated...
Click to read more »//parameters to your liking and click Save. importScript('User:Allstarecho/wpms.js'); It works perfectly for that purpose but not for what I'm trying to...
Click to read more »hadn't already. Shereth 16:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC) Ah, I hadn't seen that. The WPM specifications for location and locator maps both use equirectangular projections...
Click to read more »Reading the article's prose should take between 9 to 15 minutes at 180 to 300 wpm and an audio book at 18 minutes. Just for giggles, I timed my text to speech...
Click to read more »subcategories but I suspect the nominator doesn't either. I added another ping at WT:WPM. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC) If consensus is against...
Click to read more »better placed at the talk page of one of the suggested targets or at WP:WPM. However, as it is here that the discussion started, it is better to not...
Click to read more »at the time you viewed the page. Nakon 06:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC) See WT:WPM#TeX not rendered. — HHHIPPO 09:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC) I was doing some long-overdue...
Click to read more »maybe bend on this one specifically, but not on the GNG thing in general. 4) WPM 2019 - I disagree that this is WP:MILL. WP:MILL doesn't apply to sources...
Click to read more »30 June 2010 (UTC) There is some discussion leading up to this AfD at WT:WPM#Another vanity page? Dmcq (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »better support using javascript rather than MathML in Wikipedia, see WT:WPM#MathJax update which should hopefully remove some of the problems with it...
Click to read more »org/esa/population/publications/wpm/wpm2001.pdf (177544, -1, X, X R/X/L) www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpm/wpm2001.pdf (177544, -1, X, X R/X/L)...
Click to read more »would not exhibit them a lot here. I hope this could be the next FL of WP:WPM, and it could be the first FL of sister WikiProject, WP:3TOPE. Anyone, including...
Click to read more »16:59, 27 April 2018 (UTC) I've added a notification of this listing at WT:WPM. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:10, 27 April 2018 (UTC) delete both...
Click to read more »just changed the channel. It does not matter whether you use Digwuren's wpm or send circulars via other servers, what matters is that you maintain that...
Click to read more »similar issues before {before inviting user:Tymek into cabal mail list} [WPM] New Polish cabal members: Jacurek and Tymek [06/03/2009 13.12] In conjunction...
Click to read more »anything Shin developed. Finally, the claim that students are reading 1,000 wpm w/ good reading comprehension is almost certainly utter pseudoscience garbage...
Click to read more »Resources: Editing Wikipedia, pages 1–5 Evaluating Wikipedia Hemingway App All WPM list of missing articles (medicine) Requested articles: people in medicine...
Click to read more »to have a place for creating standards and formats to share between the WPM and WPS and any future projects though. I was going to suggest creating some...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Redirect to set-builder notation or delete per discussion on WT:WPM. —David Eppstein 23:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Delete and do not redirect No...
Click to read more »reviews and the awards on the site are fake. The speed claims such as "93 wpm in a week" are obviously false. Horrible design from an ergonomic point view...
Click to read more »February 2007 (UTC) Keep. We're discussing this again? And without notifying WT:WPM? This information is widely noted, even famous, I'd say: many nonmathematicians...
Click to read more »be established here. From the only substantive discussion on this at WP:WPM (here): "I know the problem is of little mathematical interest being essentially...
Click to read more »asked Niemeyerstein to look for some, and I also posted a message at WT:WPM yesterday asking for help, since this article is fundamentally about applied...
Click to read more »anyways am still practicing on how to up my speed.In general someone tyipng 35 wpm fast or just a lamer?and would better be suited doing something else? 2.what...
Click to read more »removed the "Characteristics" section which repeated material about the WPM - here too, I did not insert this material, nor was I at all happy with the...
Click to read more »clarified that technical phrase problem, assisted with another user at the WP:WPM. Will waiting for your other comments. Thank you. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 09:49...
Click to read more »across a case where just this level of protection would be needed. On WT:WPM we have a problem with a particularly persistant sockpuppeter, who is quite...
Click to read more »WP:DELSORT queue because a bot automatically lists relevant articles at WP:WPM/CA. This article isn't automatically considered relevant though. Pcap ping...
Click to read more »argument quite clearly. Proposed solutions (such as those discussed at WT:WPM) to "fix" the article are too problematic. There may be a kernel of some...
Click to read more »More than this, he holds together the community by frequently posting on WT:WPM pointers to pages in need of attention or to relevant discussions. An attack...
Click to read more »notable, it should still be treated within the main article, according to WPM. DGG ( talk ) 21:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Radagast3 (talk) 12:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC) I asked for expert input at WT:WPM around then, precisely because it was clear to me there were issues. Charles...
Click to read more »Uncertainty theory is notable or not. There has been a nuanced discussion at WT:WPM#Uncertainty theory. But this isn't just a personal thing. The Uncertainty...
Click to read more »and appears to be a neologism. (This has been discussed at Wikipedia_talk:WPM#Montante.27s_method.) Jakob.scholbach (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »salt, only in case of repeated recreation though, see also Wikipedia_talk:WPM#Maths_Short_Cuts. CenariumTalk 15:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC) Delete. Agree with...
Click to read more »group's off-wiki mail traffic was forwarded, the existence of a mailing list (WPM aka EEML), an instant messenger group and the development of a secret wiki...
Click to read more »3 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. It's good that KTo288 asked for help at WT:WPM (I came from there), but his/her reasoning is completely wrong. No expert...
Click to read more »art, as suggested by User:Radagast3, might be another possibility. At WT:WPM#Promotional essay articles prodded, I had suggested a transwiki, although...
Click to read more »article provides no sources to establish notability, and apparently nobody on WPM has ever heard of it before, either. The citation provided by Deor above...
Click to read more »written up by Charles Matthews at the conclusion of a similar discussion at WPM. Tkuvho (talk) 11:04, 13 August 2010 (UTC) 114.72.245.4 (aka 110.20.24.219)...
Click to read more »creation. I think they could all be merged into Askey scheme, but others on WT:WPM have suggested a more refined system for merging. --Salix alba (talk): 14:58...
Click to read more »--Cybercobra (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC) I added a note to WT:WPM regarding your removal, since it affects many math articles and in case any...
Click to read more »in a call centre to do transcribing.am a fast typer(not thaaat fast) 21 wpm.i have no previous experience but i still landed the interview i wanted to...
Click to read more »09:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Keep. I was brought here by a thread over at WT:WPM, and I was expecting to see compelling arguments to delete this on the grounds...
Click to read more »on an mathematician that apparently fails WP:PROF, see discussion at WT:WPM. It was deprodded by an IP without any commentary or improvement. Pcap ping...
Click to read more »on deletion as well, per Gandalf. I'm going to post a proposal over at WT:WPM to see if there is any interest in revising List of curves. Sławomir Biały...
Click to read more »trivial mathematical WP:DICTDEF. Agreed to delete in this discussion at WT:WPM but deprodded by an uninvolved admin. So here we go by the book. Pcap ping...
Click to read more »sensationalistic title "non-Newtonian", see also my detailed comments at WPM. Normally there would be no harm in redirecting this to "multiplicative calculus"...
Click to read more »single-handedly diffused a very difficult situation that arose between WP:GAR and WP:WPM. In fact, if you look at any of his contributions in other areas of the 'pedia...
Click to read more »· b} 20:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom and discussions at WT:WPM#Approximate inequality, and Talk:Inequality (mathematics)/Archive 1#U+2A85...
Click to read more »minutes after I replied to the nominator's query about the sequence on WT:WPM providing these references and requesting that the nominator perform WP:BEFORE...
Click to read more »a lot of time waiting for documents to come in the mail. Also, I type 90 wpm. And I use Twinkle. :) --Moonriddengirl 03:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC) Ditto...
Click to read more »WOU WOV WOW WOX WOY WOZ WPA WPB WPC WPD WPE WPF WPG WPH WPI WPJ WPK WPL WPM WPN WPO WPP WPQ WPR WPS WPT WPU WPV WPW WPX WPY WPZ WQA WQB WQC WQD WQE WQF...
Click to read more »categorization, and has already been causing problems for our project (see WT:WPM). Sławomir Biały (talk) 13:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Keep it has potential...
Click to read more »it's a brand-new stub, whose creator has requested help expanding it at WT:WPM, and that there hasn't yet been time for that expansion to happen yet. Got...
Click to read more »09:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Keep. I was brought here by a thread over at WT:WPM, and I was expecting to see compelling arguments to delete this on the grounds...
Click to read more »happens, Vecrumba will try to get PasswordUsername banned. (20090611-0230-[WPM] PasswordUsername_ opportunity.eml." I should also add my post at Hiberniantears'...
Click to read more »dozen, maybe two, in that cat)? I vote to move the conversation back to WP:WPM where other mathematicians can participate in a reasonable discussion forum...
Click to read more »at 60 words per minute, then if composition is half of typing speed (30 wpm) it took him 34 minutes. If he was very thoughtful and typed half as slowly...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) These three new article are WP:OR, see WT:WPM#Self-publication on WP? D.Lazard (talk) 13:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Delete-...
Click to read more »(UTC) FYI, for actual discussion, you'll want the project talk page, WT:WPM. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC) This is a known...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The 5min-consensus at WP:WPM was that this is WP:OR, despite the cool illustrations. Perhaps someone can...
Click to read more »grations/partners/airpatrol.html http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AirPatrol-WPM-2-0-Now-iw-2361970044.html http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/4/prweb10649113...
Click to read more », 16. (same as with 8.), 18., 21. (good reference for the symbol of the WPM), 23. (short but very good source), 25. (citation only but Richard Dawkins...
Click to read more »would have been to bring this up on the category talk page. And/or the WP:WPM talk page. The whole cfr bit seems heavy and excessively formal ... this...
Click to read more »the email list should perform a revert on this article. In 20090915-2223-[WPM] We brigades__Internet operations by Russian” Ellol had just made 3 reverts...
Click to read more »maybe bend on this one specifically, but not on the GNG thing in general. 4) WPM 2019 - I disagree that this is WP:MILL. WP:MILL doesn't apply to sources...
Click to read more »covered in a first linear algebra course. (See the original thread on WP:WPM for more discussion of this issue). Jim (talk) 03:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »a participant in the Medieval philosophy task force. linked pages {{User WPMS}} This user is a member of the Medieval Scotland WikiProject. linked pages...
Click to read more »|- |} You might visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics, in particular WP:WPM#Some issues to think about, which discusses the problem you raise. Look at...
Click to read more »WP:CANVASS: it was limited in scale to a nonpartisan and public audience (WT:WPM) but was clearly biased in message. Overturning the DRV and doing it again...
Click to read more »from the buffer at a pretty unreasonable rate. I can type at about 50-60 wpm with no problems, but as soon as I speed up to my normal typing speed (about...
Click to read more »22 December 2009 (UTC) This is a discussion for Talk:Complex number or WT:WPM, not here. Algebraist 13:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC) Is Principles of Mathematics...
Click to read more »members and possible canvassing can be seen in emails such as 20090529-1210-[WPM] banning Petr Krohn_.eml. Offliner (talk) 22:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to learn, and speeds of 38 words per minute (wpm) are possible, compared with 23 wpm for T9 and 20 wpm for multitap, says Howard Gutowitz, Eatoni's boss...
Click to read more »ever done, because I have always done my own typing, and average about 60 wpm on a computer keyboard. I have often wondered why the outmoded QWERTY is...
Click to read more »contribs) probably a sleeper, with few edits and weighing in here and WT:WPM [59].--Salix (talk): 22:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC) Accused parties may also comment/discuss...
Click to read more »a great deal of thinking. I used to worry about my reading speed of 190 wpm when I was in high school, because my friends were all at 270 and beyond...
Click to read more »to Loom91 about his own civility (as mentioned repeatedly here and at WT:WPM) would be justified, along the lines of "people in glass houses…"; but would...
Click to read more »than half a year ago so I have to disagree with SteveBaker a little bit, my wpm rose with about 10 with accuracy near 100%, but of course that was as much...
Click to read more »18:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Comment. I came here because of a thread at WT:WPM. Could someone give a clear link to the deletion discussion? Also, why wasn't...
Click to read more »here to read and understand WP:N. What are needed are sources that discuss WPM in some detail (at least a paragraph, a page is better) that are independent...
Click to read more »speak fine, I'm talking about RAPIDFIRE speech, as far from normal (say 60 wpm) typing as 120 words per minute is (which I can do). Are there any exercises...
Click to read more »edit-warring over it (report here, no action at present). I started the WT:WPM discussion, which led to a quick consensus to remove the template, and a...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Morse Code at 13 WPM "Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." sent as Morse Code at 13 WPM. RTTY "Welcome to Wikipedia...
Click to read more »anything Shin developed. Finally, the claim that students are reading 1,000 wpm w/ good reading comprehension is almost certainly utter pseudoscience garbage...
Click to read more »data, is that this would only work if you could learn to type at 180,000 WPM. APL (talk) 10:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC) When users place phones in their...
Click to read more »expected it to require a conventional SPST relay to ‘amplify’ that. At 20 WPM, a dot should be around 100 ms and a dash lasts several times as long as...
Click to read more »2006. Practice. A lot. I've seen touch typers work at 80 wpm (speech is around 60ish WPM) with zero errors. After a couple of decades of practice. Syntax...
Click to read more »deserve a separate sub[sub]section). However, I will ask the guys at WP:WPM to comment on this here. If there is a consensus toward your opinion, I agree...
Click to read more »articles. Nonmetal is ~4,300 words long, and at a fast reading speed of 160 wpm, would take 27 minutes to read. That alone should give the FAC coordinators...
Click to read more »[10] pia [14] bunn [0] slee [17] bunny [0] hatte [6] sleep [17] bur [0] wpm [21] burl [0] unke [19] burt [0] slik [17] bury [0] slip [17] bus [0] hay...
Click to read more »06:46, 14 March 2025 (UTC) @Plantman Nevermind. Just move out to the WT:WPM instead. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 06:46, 14 March 2025 (UTC) @Dedhert.Jr Well, since...
Click to read more »was included in a list of promising discrete mathematics drafts on a WP:WPM list. The remaining discrete mathematics topics on that list have been brought...
Click to read more »discussion may become much less visible. I posted a neutral message to WT:WPM to make up for the loss in visibility. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:10, 22 April...
Click to read more »treatment. Current article has little worth keeping. I've mention this on WT:WPM. --Salix alba (talk) 12:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Keep and rewrite; the phenomenon...
Click to read more »is more background on this in the previous COI report linked above, at WT:WPM, and at Talk:D'Alembert's paradox. EdJohnston (talk) 18:53, 19 September...
Click to read more »whether content should be added or removed; that's the kind of thing WT:WPM covers. I will say though, that in general I'm not a fan schemes where only...
Click to read more »tcnU7AQmnzGq-N-kXH06c26IWTZDzju-jGiRpGE0gNrRh6o7iIFgN6V2mugzv_1xkV00nxjxcWpmCFQGn80V4hpZ3yl54-WWnKm0cBZUFgLA5bfFg3uvJT-DqDuzVojNKTXkTpCRS7jGAyX7iMHpC...
Click to read more »Rubin a fool: [49] A general and uncivil telling-off of every member of WP:WPM: [50]. Specifically, these line "So, to be frank, you are all appalling custodians...
Click to read more »05:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC) This AfD was just mentioned on WT:WPM; I think the WPM people should be given a chance to respond, rather than cutting off...
Click to read more »WPM 40}} 40 This user can type over 40 WPM. linked pages {{User:LightningThrower/Userboxes/WPM 70}} 70 This user can type over 70 WPM. linked...
Click to read more »or two typing (assuming this contributor types 65 wpm; twice as long if this person types only 35 wpm as I do), & has produced a Featured article in one...
Click to read more »unsourced material into the BLP of Michael Atiyah (see the postings on WT:WPM, on WP:RSN and on WP:BLP/N), is going on a forum shopping spree across wikipedia...
Click to read more »talk page of the "Bring radical" article, and the math wikiproject at WT:WPM. It would be wise for someone to read all the prior debate and summarize...
Click to read more »(UTC) Yeah my mind is working faster than my fingers can move. But at 200 wpm what do you expect? (BTW how do you spell asphixiation?)--Light current 22:44...
Click to read more »(and I do), I don't have to re-type the whole thing. I just start typing WPM and it pops up the options, the first of which for me is going to be WPMED...
Click to read more »18:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Comment. I came here because of a thread at WT:WPM. Could someone give a clear link to the deletion discussion? Also, why wasn't...
Click to read more »one. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 18:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC) Notified WT:WPM of discussion –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:34, 18 May 2026 (UTC) On...
Click to read more »article, we will still have to delete the thing. If listing the new AfD at WP:WPM is considered one-sided, how about we post a notice at WP:AN and WP:VPP as...
Click to read more »suspect him of doing anything. The closest I can find to UPE editing on WPM is this edit to Matthew_Whitaker_(attorney) which has an inline external...
Click to read more »Thank you for writing the script. I modified it also at User:Allstarecho/wpms.js for use in tagging article talk pages with the WikiProject Mississippi...
Click to read more »WOU WOV WOW WOX WOY WOZ WPA WPB WPC WPD WPE WPF WPG WPH WPI WPJ WPK WPL WPM WPN WPO WPP WPQ WPR WPS WPT WPU WPV WPW WPX WPY WPZ WQA WQB WQC WQD WQE WQF...
Click to read more »July 2006 (UTC) Huh? We all know who Salix Alba is; he's a regular on WP:WPM, and is usually considered trustworthy. linas 04:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »reference desk is not the place for an dispute, take it to talk page, WT:WPM or use dispute resolution The following discussion has been closed. Please...
Click to read more »to type much more accurately, as well as typing more words per minute or WPM. It is a fairl inexpensive program, and is sold at most school supply websites...
Click to read more »always welcome. Compiled by Tilman Bayer From the abstract: "We found that WPM [WikiProject Medicine] articles are longer, possess a greater density of...
Click to read more »have participated in many discussions over the last decade, certainly at WT:WPM and perhaps also at WP:RSN, about the use of computer algebra systems in...
Click to read more »2008 - user:Wpmed - user talk (contribs) on page WPM Education (diff) -> calculated overlap Wpmed <-> WPM Education (U->P: 100% - P->U 41.66% -> ratio 41...
Click to read more »merge and redirect. --Ezeu 07:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Should probably go to WPM and add a note about chars per second. Merge and redirect. M1ss1ontomars2k4...
Click to read more »expert on the physics) because of a request from the principal editor at WT:WPM. In my corner of the world, the AdS/CFT correspondence is typically associated...
Click to read more »here to read and understand WP:N. What are needed are sources that discuss WPM in some detail (at least a paragraph, a page is better) that are independent...
Click to read more »mathematics, so if it's to be a WikiProject I would think it would be WT:WPM, but it's true that the natural sciences probably have similar dynamics (not...
Click to read more »(UTC) kk thx 4 everything! =)Meliss402 (talk) 16:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC) At WT:WPM, we are trying to make templates that would allow us to add links to equations...
Click to read more »deserve a separate sub[sub]section). However, I will ask the guys at WP:WPM to comment on this here. If there is a consensus toward your opinion, I agree...
Click to read more »article, we will still have to delete the thing. If listing the new AfD at WP:WPM is considered one-sided, how about we post a notice at WP:AN and WP:VPP as...
Click to read more »by some experienced math editors. There have been recent complaints at WT:WPM about mathematics articles getting tagged as essays (archived discussion)...
Click to read more »26 March 2024 (UTC) IMO, such a discussion should be better placed at WT:WPM, since the interested editors are necessarily participants to the wiki project...
Click to read more »use if ever I need to talk with someone. I type 120 wpm on a keyboard, on a phone, it's like 1 wpm. SusunW (talk) 23:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC) I've rescued...
Click to read more »http://www.pantheism.net/ which is the site of World Pantheism Movement (WPM). --Noleander (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 1) I have seen the phrase...
Click to read more »maybe bend on this one specifically, but not on the GNG thing in general. 4) WPM 2019 - I disagree that this is WP:MILL. WP:MILL doesn't apply to sources...
Click to read more »I knocked this up using the Wikipedia 1.0 assessment list as of 17 May 2009 and an average of the readership stats Henrik's excellent gizmo for the first...
Click to read more »Grief Blur Occupations Wikipedia Purchase Manager, police officer, businessman, writer Organization(s) WPM, WPS Height 6.8 ft 4 in (217 cm) Children 1.5...
Click to read more »wou wov wow wox woy woz wpa wpb wpc wpd wpe wpf wpg wph wpi wpj wpk wpl wpm wpn wpo wpp wpq wpr wps wpt wpu wpv wpw wpx wpy wpz wqa wqb wqc wqd wqe wqf...
Click to read more »HelpfulCandy007 Saint Gayane Church Fighton21 Little Ethiopia, Los Angeles Jude WPM Miami Modern architecture Kokordilos67 Akhaltsikhe Flyingcat03 Katie Wheeler...
Click to read more »enough comments to close the discussion, so I'll post a notification on WT:WPM.--SilverMatsu (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2026 (UTC) This is a content concern first...
Click to read more »16:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC) I have opened a related discussion at WT:WPM#Should Algebra be reverted to the version of 21 Decembre 2023?. D.Lazard...
Click to read more »articles. Nonmetal is ~4,300 words long, and at a fast reading speed of 160 wpm, would take 27 minutes to read. That alone should give the FAC coordinators...
Click to read more »(exists?) No 3099 P:MISS (links) Portal:Mississippi (exists?) No 3100 P:WPMS (links) Portal:Mississippi (exists?) No 3101 P:PMS (links) Portal:Mississippi...
Click to read more »article, we will still have to delete the thing. If listing the new AfD at WP:WPM is considered one-sided, how about we post a notice at WP:AN and WP:VPP as...
Click to read more »member of the WikiProject Medieval England linked pages {{Template:User WPMS}} This user is a member of the Medieval Scotland WikiProject. linked pages...
Click to read more »This page contains material that is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. Shortcut Help:WPMHelp:WPM...
Click to read more »zWrTrZtFbTxzJFzhw5RnbG7HrzDk9 TgfOAXchCG8FVtlZT3lK743FRg4z4VbP906o04aez0qWPmO7IFReLiIJzg7n bqcnc5zXM1y+bUFEcVmkCCTj2m4ye4i+J693JPjt5VIJ8KCBwVxhSsot5vUP...
Click to read more »article to take over an hour to read at 250 wpm or for the 269 kb John McCain to take almost an hour? (At 250 wpm it would take 45 minutes to read Huey Long...
Click to read more »discussion. Tension arises between user @Radlrb with multiple users in WP:WPM, regarding the article 1234 (number), and numerous discussions about how...
Click to read more »talk page of the "Bring radical" article, and the math wikiproject at WT:WPM. It would be wise for someone to read all the prior debate and summarize...
Click to read more »purchase btw MGM officials will give you a slip of paper you will present to WPM at the One Montgomery Tower in San Francisco, the WMF's headquarters. Upon...
Click to read more »page of the involved article, or, if several articles are concerned, on WT:WPM, the talk page of the Wikiproject Mathematics. D.Lazard (talk) 14:39, 29...
Click to read more »Staraction (talk · contribs) 02:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC) I have notified WT:WPM again. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC) Delete Agree with the...
Click to read more »laptops if all goes well at Wikimania. We are also starting a small MDWiki:WPM:Community tech team to work on community wishes. We are happy to have others...
Click to read more »would not exhibit them a lot here. I hope this could be the next FL of WP:WPM, and it could be the first FL of sister WikiProject, WP:3TOPE. Anyone, including...
Click to read more »02:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC) Seems like a good idea to bring it up at WT:WPM, where you might find editors who know something about the subject. 173.79...
Click to read more »topic of MathWorld whether they are reliable or not has been discussed in WT:WPM, and many articles are relying on it, especially in the external links. See...
Click to read more »exhibition and the problem of arranging images had already been discussed in WT:WPM. Also, many related articles on those tables, I suppose, does not have any...
Click to read more »editor in this content dispute, I have requested additional input at WT:WPM. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 11:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC) Please do not call other...
Click to read more »version, established through proper discussion. Take to WP:AfC, and ping WT:WPM if you want a new article here." Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: Diffs...
Click to read more »July 2025 (UTC) Delete as non-notable. I think WP:OR may also apply. cf. WT:WPM/Archive/2024/Dec § Draft:Codenominator Function. The concept seems to have...
Click to read more »clean it up is—blindlynx 13:38, 5 June 2026 (UTC) you might also post to WT:WPM ~2026-28744-62 (talk) 01:20, 6 June 2026 (UTC) My first intuition is that...
Click to read more »want we could try to get some more involvement from other editors at WT:WPM or a similar place. –jacobolus (t) 17:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC) How exactly...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC) Delete. I was unsure before, but the WT:WPM discussion convinced me that this is original research. No reliable sources...
Click to read more »not. My phone is a phone, end stop. I am a touch typist and type over 100 wpm on a Spanish keyboard configured for English. When did you start editing...
Click to read more »With respect to summary style videos, am in support of the use of MDWiki:WPM:VideoWiki style videos, which are supportable by reliable sources and collaboratively...
Click to read more »invertible for k > n {\displaystyle k>n} . For the previous discussion, see WT:WPM#Weak n-category where all morphisms of a certain dimension or higher are...
Click to read more »WP:WL Help:Watchlist WP:Wikilawyering 2017-07-15 2006-03-24 1 7 1 7 Help:WPM WP:WPM Help:Buying Wikipedia/Wikipedia Purchase Management WP:WikiProject Mathematics...
Click to read more »as it is inactive for a long time? No response ever since I asked in WP:WPM. Also, I see that this WikiProject do not have the template box for assessing...
Click to read more »maybe bend on this one specifically, but not on the GNG thing in general. 4) WPM 2019 - I disagree that this is WP:MILL. WP:MILL doesn't apply to sources...
Click to read more »they were going to run. This changed, and they only provided a sample on WPM. In order to ensure that enough comment has been received that consensus...
Click to read more »talk:WikiProject History of Science. I have to run but I'll open a discussion on WPM when I get a chance. –jacobolus (t) 20:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC) Those were...
Click to read more »the question over at WP:ANI. — Maile (talk) 01:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC) WT:WPM is more likely to get a better response from people competent to read the...
Click to read more »16:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC) I have opened a related discussion at WT:WPM#Should Algebra be reverted to the version of 21 Decembre 2023?. D.Lazard...
Click to read more »you want more eyeballs, it's more useful to ask for help somewhere like WT:WPM where the participants are knowledgeable and interested about mathematics...
Click to read more »Automobiles 8 WPChina WikiProject China 8 WPLATVIA WikiProject Latvia 8 WPMS WikiProject Motorsport 8 WPPOLAND WikiProject Poland 8 WPRocketry WikiProject...
Click to read more »Science (but sadly the project seems to be in standby). I will also ask the WP:WPM for a review. Regliste (talk) 11:20, 14 December 2025 (UTC) There seems to...
Click to read more »