Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Shortcuts WP:WINARSWP:WINARS WP:NOTSOURCEWP:NOTSOURCE WP:WINRSWP:WINRS WP:DCWOWWP:DCWOW...
Click to read more »consider any information to be false but rather Notability is not based on WP:WINRS. Still, I welcome more opinions/assessments than just my own point of view...
Click to read more »is not a big school, but it is certainly NOT a D-list university. Since WINR and several other college radio stations are streaming, people might want...
Click to read more »in my article about how they're incorrect? @Dhoogenkamp:, please see WP:WINRS which will address many of the sources you used in the draft. --CNMall41...
Click to read more »sources (diff diff diff) as well as deliberately ignoring WP:CIRCULAR and WP:WINRS by adding links to other wiki articles, either from this one or from other...
Click to read more »(UTC) To offer my point of view as a counterpoint, my understanding of WP:WINRS are that they are only go so far as to citing in-article sources, not in...
Click to read more »alone one that defines an "official" script and it fails reliability on WP:WINRS. Official when used and supported officially The alternative definition...
Click to read more »that. The Edward VIII article is, strictly, not reliable anyway per WP:WINRS; but especially so as, coincidentally, it was nominated to have its FA-status...
Click to read more »then surely that would automatically make it an unreliable source under WP:WINRS? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Hardly...
Click to read more »is not a big school, but it is certainly NOT a D-list university. Since WINR and several other college radio stations are streaming, people might want...
Click to read more »wingged - 1 winng - 1 winninng - 1 winnng - 1 winnnig - 1 winnning - 1 winrs - 1 winss - 1 wirhdrawn - 1 wirhout - 1 wisespread - 1 withdrawm - 1 withdrewn...
Click to read more »that. The Edward VIII article is, strictly, not reliable anyway per WP:WINRS; but especially so as, coincidentally, it was nominated to have its FA-status...
Click to read more »consider any information to be false but rather Notability is not based on WP:WINRS. Still, I welcome more opinions/assessments than just my own point of view...
Click to read more »capitalized version is more common and used throughout the article" – WP:WINRS), containing no policy-based reasoning ("Sources use the capped version...
Click to read more »@Eucharia Ukwueze Welcome to the Teahouse. This is discussed in the essay at WP:WINRS. The idea is that you should evaluate the sources in our articles and use...
Click to read more »