within them (see also Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap). Shortcut WP:WHYNWP:WHYN Editors apply notability standards to all subjects to determine whether the...

significance. Sources are not there to build a balanced article (see: WP:WHYN), as they are routine industry coverage and award nomination materials. Does...

substantial article" is "all t[hat] is required by []WHYN." A cursory reading of WHYN reveals that WHYN: (1) doesn't require anything itself but merely explains...

discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:WHYN: insufficient sources to build a full bio; no indications of notability....

to the awards. The awards, however, do not overcome the lack of RS per WP:WHYN. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability. Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:WHYN, WP:SIGCOV and WP:BASIC. Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)...

organisation and directory listings, and are insufficient to meet GNG / BIO per WP:WHYN. The awards do not overcome the lack of RS; please see the recent discussion...

22 October 2017 (UTC) Unscintillating, perhaps you should go and read WP:WHYN, and then read the notability policies again as you clearly don't understand...

article is mostly based off of non-independent sources. Per the guideline WP:WHYN: We require that all articles rely primarily on "third-party" or "independent...

not inherently notable per WP:NHOOPS. Without enough sources, it fails WP:WHYN as we are unable to "... actually write a whole article, rather than half...

find any relevant interviews for him. This subject also does not meet WP:WHYN. Quoting the guideline: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources...

pages undercut my argument sufficiently to change it. In particular, WP:WHYN's discussion of sourcing is persuasive. I can find sources mentioning the...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed so that we can write a fair and...

contribute to that source's significance and therefore the requirements of WP:WHYN. (Or, if you will, the fan fiction Krycek and more specifically the Krycek...

article. No indication of notability at all. Fails WP:NBIO, WP:NACTOR, WP:WHYN, WP:BASIC and WP:SIGCOV. Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:22, 26 October 2019 (UTC)...

SNG pass does not overcome lack of sources, thus this page falls under WP:WHYN. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

subject is not notable; see WP:N. Also relevant: WP:WHYN. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC) WHYN is not a part of the standard, and WP:N doesn't...

coverage about the subject here which can enable us to write an article per WP:WHYN. I am also not particularly convinced by the credits. --Lemongirl942 (talk)...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a reasonably...

encompassed under the Wikipedia Notability Criteria WP:BIO or WP:BLP given WP:WHYN and WP:N (and some instances of WP:SPIP) Steuben (talk) 15:41, 29 November...

him in books[1] that could be used to expand the article on Globish. WP:WHYN says "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about...

factual page beyond a dictionary definition per WP:NOT, WP:NOPAGE and WP:WHYN. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:12, 27 July 2022 (UTC) Keep per 78.26 passes...

Eurovision/Archive 14#On Notability of OGAE Contests (which an editor pointed out WP:WHYN) noted that OGAE events are not notable enough to warrant individual contest...

not enough source material to build a bio article, thus falling under WP:WHYN. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

(talk • contribs) 19:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC) See WP:N for a detailed answer, WP:WHYN specifically. Wikipedia is not a not a collection of indiscriminate information...

actresses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:WHYN -- no meaningful biographical content or RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:12, 14...

lack of significant coverage from multiple, independent sources. Per WP:WHYN, significant coverage is needed "so that we can actually write a whole article...

independent sources. Not enough coverage to write a full article per WP:WHYN.—Bagumba (talk) 08:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

17 May 2022 (UTC) Delete article doesn't meet notability criteria. As WP:WHYN states, "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a reasonably...

WP:OUTCOMES; nothing stands out about this subject to warrant an article per WP:WHYN.K.e.coffman (talk) 04:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC) Delete as only best known...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a reasonably...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a fair and...

any notable roles or anything I can write above a dictionary definition WP:WHYN JA Wikipedia article is an empty credits list dump as well. AngusWOOF (bark...

ex-boyfriend. She had her breasts augmented in May 2005. References AIFD See WP:WHYN. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO either as the two awards listed are both scene...

establishing that the site is a reliable source than for notability. WP:WHYN does a good job of discussing why notability is important; without significant...

connection to the subject. The event fails to pass WP:GNG or WP:EVENT. WP:WHYN states article requires "significant coverage" in reliable sources (that...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing but minor roles; fails WP:NACTOR, WP:WHYN, and WP:SIGCOV. Sk8erPrince (talk) 06:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This...

notability requirement "are not retained as separate articles." WP:FAILN. See WP:WHYN and WP:NOTDIRECTORY for an explanation of why we have this requirement. In...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a fair and...

Unscintillating (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC) Comment -- at issues here is WP:WHYN; the subject lacks reliable & independent sources that would cover it directly...

Eurovision/Archive 14#On Notability of OGAE Contests (which an editor pointed out WP:WHYN) noted that OGAE events are not notable enough to warrant individual articles...

every article should be WP:GNG per WP:WHYN.----Pontificalibus 07:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC) GNG and N (to which WHYN redirects) completely contradict each...

July 1935. Plenty enough sources out there to write a whole article per WP:WHYN----Pontificalibus 09:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Keep per all above. Clearly...

review typically soon become featured article candidates. Shortcut WP:WHYNWP:WHYN Editors apply notability standards to all subjects to determine whether the...

listing which is not an independent source as she apparently works there. WP:WHYN requires more sources and this is particularly true for BLPs. --Lemongirl942...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a reasonably...

support just one sentence. So for this reason, per the first point of WP:WHYN, this topic should be merged into another article (in this case, all relevant...

her brother's page is an example of the goal of a Wikipedia article (WP:WHYN), this fails WP:SIGCOV. A Google news search does not generate enough information...

Rikster2. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Delete Per guideline WP:WHYN, We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

12:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC) Keep. Way too many references in face of WP:WHYN. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 21:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a reasonably...

can easily fulfill the requirements for "more than half a paragraph" of WP:WHYN. Daranios (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Daranios, "The Klingons as Homeric...

WP:GNG with significant coverage in independent reliable source. Thus, WP:WHYN can be met "so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half...

be redirected to List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame. Please see WP:WHYN. Edit #2: The article now contains an additional paragraph, but the sources...

lead, which makes the article fall under the problems in WP:PERMA and WP:WHYN. Yosemiter (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH...

This is WP:TOOSOON. Third party sources are specifically required per WP:WHYN and I am unable to find any at the moment. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:38, 2...

not giving evidence that the topic is notable. Please read WP:GNG and WP:WHYN as to what is actually expected from the sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions)...

WP:NBASKETBALL. No evidence this article can ever be expanded much. Per WP:WHYN: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

Khagrachhari Hill District Development Agency spoke on the occasion." Per WP:WHYN, we have inclusion criteria so that we can actually write a whole biography...

PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010Talk 16:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:WHYN -- no independent reliable sources sufficient to build an article. K.e.coffman...

driven, of which I'm not convinced), do not overcome the lack of RS per WP:WHYN. For closed AfDs on comparable articles, please see: Wikipedia:Articles for...

reviews were not passing mentions, and therefore the topic fullfilling WP:WHYN/WP:GNG. A closer look at sources during the WP:BEFORE search seems warranted...

meet GNG. However, we need multiple sources like this. Per the guideline WP:WHYN: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

don't care about PORNBIO in this case and would !vote delete regardless. WP:WHYN requires that we have enough reliable sources to write an NPOV article about...

(UTC) KEEP Perfectly valid list article as it aids in navigation. See WP:WHYN Dream Focus 15:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC) Keep standard article premise Deathlibrarian...

reporting, and so there is insufficient content to write a full article (WP:WHYN). However, there is a suitable broader article in which the subject can easily...

be met, and I'm convinced that the subject does not meet WP:SIGCOV and WP:WHYN, because the majority of the sources are just mere WP:SELFPUB tweets, with...

without any secondary coverage, there is not enough to write an article per WP:WHYN. So delete. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC) The above discussion...

(Ba–Bm) Unless there is significant coverage to write and article per WP:WHYN, KC doesn't make a soldier automatically notable. A redirect is appropriate...

notability, imo. Mooonswimmer 04:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Delete:From WP:WHYN "We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

from the Los Angeles Times and The Orange County Register). This fails WP:WHYN, which states that we need ample coverage so "that we can actually write...

sources", right? Which I think is the case here, just enough to fullfill WP:WHYN. The fact that it got a not-so-major(?) award in my view is just an additional...

negligible published content to summarize in an article about this album (see WP:WHYN). A track listing is padding (see WP:NOTEVERYTHING #8). Redirect to Reks...

that literally nothing else is available, I will go with a delete per WP:WHYN. There is also no evidence that the subject passes WP:CREATIVE. --Lemongirl942...

article if it is just used, and that's the decisive part according to WP:WHYN. Starting from a section in a character list and expanding from there would...

coverage online and worry this might never be more than a stub per guideline WP:WHYN. However, an WP:IAR argument could be made to complete this otherwise ~99%...

information on a musical group that headlined theatres in the 1930s, per WP:WHYN. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC) Keep as per User:78...

that does *not* guarantee inclusion. Also, if you don't mind reading WP:WHYN: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

previous Miss Supranational AfD, "the pageant is not notable as per WP:GNG. WP:WHYN states article requires "significant coverage" in reliable sources (that...

Fails WP:GNG with lack of multiple sources of significant coverage. Per WP:WHYN, we need enough coverage so a whole article can be written, and multiple...

the subject, per WP:WHYN. In this case, a redirect to a list is appropriate. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC) WHYN is a part of the rationale...

aren't sufficient source to write a biography, nor will there ever be. WP:WHYN explains we require significant coverage"so that we can actually write a...

consider the subject as notable, as I think she fails WP:NACTOR. Also fails WP:WHYN and WP:BIO. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC) Note: This...

Gitmo detainee articles lacked only a single third-party source, as per WP:WHYN #4. Arguably, and I will continue to argue this strenuously, only a crooked...

see how much information is given on the subject. Overall I also find WP:WHYN important, namely why we need SIGCOV: We require "significant coverage" in...

the LA Times coverage is merely routine. It only counts as one source (WP:WHYN, fifth bullet point), but it's an instance of substantial coverage. Innisfree987...

is something else, like how important something is, then go and read WP:WHYN. Dysklyver 19:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC) Comment – An idea is to merge to Cracker...

multiple sources, but nothing substantial to support an article. Per WP:WHYN: We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually...

WP:INDISCRIMINATE. But, since the article does satisfy the list criteria at WP:WHYN, as a navigational list where someone might go to find a bomb to research...

and covers the subject in detail makes the objection moot. WP:GNG and WP:WHYN are clear about this. Yes, having one source is not the greatest (maybe to...

mentioned in a dictionary but which don't have an encyclopedia article. WP:WHYN explains why we need significant coverage in reliable sources in order to...

real question is whether the coverage of his career enough to satisfy WP:WHYN. Some players never get called up but have coverage, and some players could...

in reliable sources that would allow us to write a proper article per WP:WHYN. It seems the Stagecoach Gold article would only ever list this route, whereas...

satisfy GNG. This is literally the only somewhat good coverage I found. Per WP:WHYN, we definitely don't have enough here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:27, 6 October...

available about the subject. Secondary sources are especially required per WP:WHYN for writing an NPOV article, but I don't see any here. The inline reference...

at the 1980 Summer Olympics#Athletics as an alternative to deletion – WP:WHYN and WP:SPORTCRIT both respectively state that "We require the existence of...

[2] [3] Can't write a meaningful article beyond a dictionary definition WP:WHYN AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Delete Lacks secondary...

that the article has no usable sources? We have the following guideline (WP:WHYN): We require that all articles rely primarily on "third-party" or "independent...

more secondary sources we are now in my view beyond the requirements of WP:WHYN. I don't consider the fact that a greater part of those are specialized magazines...

sourcing weighs. There is significant coverage to write an article with per WP:WHYN. The coverage of her works is relevant per WP:ARTIST, at least the ones where...

pass WP:SIGCOV and allow a full article about this school to be written (WP:WHYN). I used an online translator to look through the search results Tedder shared...

support, and sourcing is adequate for notability in consideration of WP:WHYN. Source analysis: The wording "intelligent falling" seems to have originated...

secondary sources in total are enough to fullfill the requirements of WP:WHYN and WP:ALLPLOT. AfD is not cleanup. Daranios (talk) 17:59, 12 November 2022...

no third party sources, it is difficult to write an NPOV article per WP:WHYN. Accordingly, I think I will go with a TNT delete. --Lemongirl942 (talk)...

the whole world.carsten.schipke (talk) 08:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC) See WP:WHYN. We are not attempting to "index the whole world". For one thing, every article...

nfirms-ability-sole-directors-make-decisions I stress the phrasing of WP:WHYN states that "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that...

reception" is sourced (and not to blogs!), and is large enough to fullfill WP:WHYN. So no reason to delete. And while the commentary does still not quite balance...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I fail to see how this actor meets WP:NACTOR, WP:WHYN and WP:GNG. Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC) - User has been...

October 2016 (UTC) Delete -- insufficient sources to build an article. WP:WHYN applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC) Delete as not actually...

is informative about the group, so it is more than a definition, per WP:WHYN. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...

sources, while none is very long, togethere they would allow to fullfill WP:WHYN. No objections against treating the subject within the Mad (magazine) and...

Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC) WP:WHYN Because these requirements are based on major content policies, they apply...

recipients (A); insufficient sources for a stand-alone article: link; see WP:WHYN. WP:SOLDIER itself has been recently modified, and the awarding of the KC...

Esw01407 (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:WHYN. Secondary sources are required and I am unable to find one. Sourcing an...

insufficient to pass WP:GNG and build a policy-compliant article, per WP:WHYN. We need to demonstrate coverage exists now, and only one of the sources...

at the 1988 Summer Olympics#Athletics as an alternative to deletion – WP:WHYN and WP:SPORTCRIT both respectively state that "We require the existence of...

coverage needed to support an article of more than a few sentences per WP:WHYN. Could possibly be a merge to Charismatic Christianity or one of the articles...

secondary sources. WP:WHYN is still a part of WP:N. There is no proof that it has been "rejected as part of the guideline" proper. WP:WHYN is not circular....

the subject in sufficient detail to constitute significant coverage. WP:WHYN explains that signifcant coverage is coverage that enables more than a few...

college website, which says little more than it is named after her.[1] Per WP:WHYN, "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about...

significant independent reliable sources available. Most importantly, it fails WP:WHYN, insofar as I don't think it's possible to write an informative article of...

for this kind of list of articles (notwithstanding what WP:LISTN and WP:WHYN say regarding navigational lists). postdlf (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)...

aren't sufficient source to write a biography, nor will there ever be. WP:WHYN explains we require significant coverage"so that we can actually write a...

see nothing in WP:WHYN that could possibly impugn the notability of this department. (I think it is also worth pointing out that WHYN is at most describing...

not enough available to build a WP:V article substantial enough to meet WP:WHYN. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Delete Does...

blogspot.com, with no indication that it is reliable. Per the guideline WP:WHYN, significant coverage is needed "so that we can actually write a whole article...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a fair and...

Forget notability, we don't even have RS for verifiability. If I go by WP:WHYN, there are literally no independent sources about the subject. While I can...

party coverage means that we cannot really have a standalone article per WP:WHYN. I prefer a redirect here (with history intact). --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:29...

even merit a mention in its block nomination form 2) as both GEOLAND and WP:WHYN make clear, we need sufficient sourcing to write a proper article - a few...

like some of those mentioned by Jclemens can expand this, fullfilling WP:WHYN. E.g. "Salva a la animadora, salva el mundo": una lectura propagandística...

original research. On waiting, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, (See: Wikipedia:WHYN). As an WP:ATD-R, and to prevent a possible "No consensus", I would not argue...

applies. PERMASTUB is not a policy, etc., but the idea behind it comes from WP:WHYN: "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually...

Sandstein 06:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC) Keep The found coverage can fullfill WP:WHYN, so this should be kept and improved rather than deleted. Daranios (talk)...

this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:WHYN, the existence of reliable sources is enough; they do not have to be included...

remains. There is enough source material out there now, however, to satisfy WP:WHYN, if someone is willing to write an article from it. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:38...

notable, then we don't have content to summarize to make an article (WP:WHYN). Being referred to in another Wikipedia article is not a basis for notability...

demonstrating notability. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC) Weak keep; per WP:WHYN which explains SIGCOV, "If only a few sentences could be written and supported...

somewhat-useful NPOV and V article can be created for our readers, per WP:WHYN. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

review. Being "mentioned" in the other sources isn't much to go on, per WP:WHYN need "significant coverage". -- Green Cardamom (talk) 19:33, 18 November...

based only on sports statistics is against policy (WP:SPORTCRIT and see WP:WHYN).----Pontificalibus 12:32, 1 April 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

JSTOR · TWL) No notability. JA wiki is also a stub. Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:WHYN and WP:GNG. Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2019 (UTC) - User has been...

fails due to the evident lack of significant coverage. WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:WHYN are clear that we can't base biographies on mere statistics. I have seen...

not enough coverage to be able to write a verifiable NPOV article per WP:WHYN and hence it should be deleted. The musical achievements actually indicate...

total body of sources and depth do pass the spirit of notability (ie WP:WHYN). Smmurphy(Talk) 22:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Keep - he is notable not for...

Necrothesp (talk) 10:13, 29 January 2020 (UTC) What about the first point of WP:WHYN? “If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about...

not one good sources and certainly not enough to write an article per WP:WHYN. Some of these sources are essentially of the form "the Association of Temporary...

information to write more than a paragraph or two on the subject (per WP:WHYN)? Or if the incident, could you explain why you think this information should...

sufficient independent reliable sources to verify it. Keep per WP:ENC and WP:WHYN. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Keep Per Worldbruce and the...

sufficient bio. Even if we kept the article, it would still fail WP:BIO and WP:WHYN. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Firion is an incredibly...

Air Defense Force (as that's what "Air Defense Base" is piped to) per WP:WHYN; despite a technical pass of WP:SOLDIER (which is an essay, BTW, not an SNG)...

aren't sufficient source to write a biography, nor will there ever be. WP:WHYN explains we require significant coverage "so that we can actually write a...

need significant coverage, else this is a permastub. Per the guideline WP:WHYN: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

Delete I don't see enough coverage at the moment to write an article per WP:WHYN. There is some coverage in tech blogs about the products (some are literally...

and in detail. At best, can be deleted & redirected to Elegant Angel; WP:WHYN is applicable. Please also see Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2016_October_9...

there are sufficient reliable third-party sources to write an article per WP:WHYN.--Pontificalibus 08:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC) Delete: Notability is not "very...

WP:TOOSOON and in any case there is not enough coverage about the subject for WP:WHYN. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Comment. This source...

NBASKETBALL because referees generally don't receive significant coverage. Per WP:WHYN: "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually...

and while coverage is often short, I believe collectively there is [[WP:WHYN|enough to write a full article which also fullfills the requirements of WP:NOTPLOT...

aren't sufficient source to write a biography, nor will there ever be. WP:WHYN explains we require significant coverage "so that we can actually write a...

they get an article on Wikipedia. Period. Per the Notability guidelines WP:WHYN: "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about...

this place exists based on reliable secondary sources as required at WP:WHYN, of which there are none, then such an article should not exist. Aviationwikiflight...

notability is not temporary; it is sustained (proven substantial). Somehow, WP:WHYN and WP:NPF explain attempts to limit number of articles about low-profile...

November 2024 (UTC) No comment Keep This is a WP:DISAMBIGUATION page. By WP:WHYN "the general notability criteria [...] do not, however, apply to pages whose...

of articles by him but nothing about him. I am using the rationale at WP:WHYN here that we require reliable sources so that we are able to write an NPOV...

notability, but hometown coverage alone does not suffice to satisfy WP:WHYN's requirement for a breadth of sources sufficient to create a balanced portrayal...

total, I think that's enough to establish notability in accordance with WP:WHYN. Daranios (talk) 16:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC) Looking again I am fine with...

sufficient sources with which to write an article are discovered, per WP:WHYN. ----Pontificalibus 12:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC) it is common to give an exception...

subject is not notable as an author, and there's nothing besides that. Per WP:WHYN, there is no reason to have an article on the subject.K.e.coffman (talk)...

accompanying the additional criteria and with support from the reasoning given in WHYN, the additional criteria like PORNBIO should not be used to find notability...

16 December 2012 (UTC) You won't build an article only from that. Per WP:WHYN, "We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

inclusion guidelines since at least 2008. Please see WP:WHYN for why SIGCOV is required. If you've read WHYN and you still are unhappy, feel free to complain...

valid reason for deletion. // Liftarn (talk) The reasons are listed at WP:WHYN. Long story short, writing a fair and verifiable Wikipedia article is impossible...

Times that may just be enough to write a non-stubby article, fullfilling WP:WHYN. It might also be little enough to merge, and the obvious target would be...

aren't sufficient source to write a biography, nor will there ever be. WP:WHYN explains we require significant coverage "so that we can actually write a...

one source. Much more is needed to actually write a complete article (WP:WHYN). wjematherplease leave a message... 14:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC) Possible...

event is not considered significant coverage. The guideline also says in WP:WHYN: We require the existence of at least one secondary source so that the article...

May 2012 (UTC) Delete. The pageant is not notable yet as per WP:GNG. WP:WHYN states article requires "significant coverage" in reliable sources (that...

sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail, thus falling under WP:WHYN. The award listed is not significant & well known. Many articles created...

sufficient depth of coverage exists to enable us to write an article per WP:WHYN.---Pontificalibus 04:57, 26 April 2021 (UTC) WP:AUD does and that's we use...

our readers would be best served with a redirect to the soundtrack per WP:WHYN. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 23:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...

secondary sources. This claim required at least one additional reliable source. WHYN, which explains the purpose of notability guidelines, states: * We require...

a source, I still feel the coverage is not sufficiently in-depth per WP:WHYN: "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually...

at the 1988 Summer Olympics#Athletics as an alternative to deletion – WP:WHYN and WP:SPORTCRIT both respectively state that "We require the existence of...

(talk · contribs) 08:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC) We do require that. WP:WHYN. Traumnovelle (talk) 08:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC) ...welcome to AfD, where...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't think this actor meets WP:NACTOR, WP:WHYN and WP:GNG. Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:57, 3 November 2019 (UTC) - User has been...

trivial mention - we just need enough details to write an article per WP:WHYN. The size of each publication and the relative proportion of the coverage...

happen when articles get written exclusively from scorecard data, and WP:WHYN. I have rewritten the article and removed the invented narrative. wjematherplease...

have been listed collectively allow to write an article which fullfills WP:WHYN, so I see no benefit for the users of Wikipedia in deleting this article...

that, I know that. What you should be reading is WP:ARTN, WP:NEXIST, WP:WHYN because your reasoning contradicts these important and specific Wikipedia...

significance is discussed in a number of secondary sources. I think WP:GNG/WP:WHYN could be fullfilled with the this article (has just short of a page) and...

Cup match is a rare accomplishment, but I just don't see this passing WP:WHYN. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC) @78.26, FWIW, I'm...

delete !voters who also noted relevant statements such as WP:NRVE and WP:WHYN, statements that have not been disagreed with, which is especially concerning...

school with passing mentions/quotes by the subject. Per WP:NOPAGE and WP:WHYN there shouldn't be a separate page for the subject. --Lemongirl942 (talk)...

content policies, applies to all articles to ensure Wikipedia credibility. WP:WHYN Morganmyrmo (talk) 05:30, 30 March 2012 (UTC) Comment - Incidental coverage...

easily provide enough material to write a full article, i.e. fullfilling WP:WHYN. There are also many more mentions in other secondary sources, though I have...

mean it is needed to be subjected to deletion. Read WP:ARTN, WP:NEXIST, WP:WHYN. and on It's the type of coverage that gives vocal thanks to God when talking...

stand-alone bio article; see WP:WHYN. It's a "delete" for me in this case. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC) WHYN is not a part of the standard...

also consider the stated goals of the notability criteria described in WP:WHYN, which among them the goal is to not have articles which can never extend...

is not the significant coverage that GNG requires. Per the guideline WP:WHYN: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

article. It currently fits WP:NOTDICTIONARY is a pseudo biography, and per WP:WHYN should not have an article. A search produced the Wikimedia image file (used...

reach. The notability guidelines were written to help diminish abuse (WP:WHYN), particularly in self-promotion. I don't see that problem here. I see this...

article if it is just used, and that's the decisive part according to WP:WHYN. Starting from a section in a character list and expanding from there would...

see enough secondary coverage here to be able to write an article per WP:WHYN. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:43, 8 November 2016 (UTC) The above discussion...

worldwide press coverage and just don't go away; they therefore meet WP:WHYN. Mariepr (talk) 04:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC) Comment The present project is...

assertions are at all vague as you are saying. As Daranios have noted, quoting WP:WHYN, there is adequate material to write a short article here. Haleth (talk)...

singular way. That is a failure of WP:BIO. Article on its own also fails WP:WHYN. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC) Automated comment: This...

from independent, reliable sources to write a substantial article per WP:WHYN. The article is mostly composed of redundant seasonal stat lines and a resume...

(UTC) Delete - Thanks for the useful and civil discussion. Unfortunately, WP:WHYN is persuasive here. There is not adequate reliable coverage to write a verifiable...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a reasonably...

just to move the infobox... Landpin (talk) 20:56, 16 August 2025 (UTC) WP:WHYN says We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can...

..", I was referring to Mr. Guye's rationale, which is backed up by WP:WHYN, that an article of only a few sentences does not qualify for a separate...

opinion, but notability is actually related to sourceablity, read down to WP:WHYN for useful explanation. 4. per WP:ATD, articles with insufficient available...

what is now already in the article shows that secondary sources beat WP:WHYN, without even using all of them, or using them fully. Daranios (talk) 14:11...

of the subject is missing and there is no need to have an article per WP:WHYN. I also think this is WP:TOOSOON. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:36, 27 October...

broader notability and satisfy the “balanced” account requirement in WP:WHYN. Somewhat like (but less severely than) the campus newspaper of a subject’s...

seem to be any particular social, cultural or historical significance. WP:WHYN specifically requires that we have enough third party sources so as to be...

establish enough material and commentary to fulfill the requirements of WP:WHYN and WP:ALLPLOT, and therefore establish notability. Daranios (talk) 07:20...

There is also no inherent notability in just being an ambassador. Per WP:WHYN for a standalone article, we specifically require coverage in reliable secondary...

Thanks, Sandstein 11:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC) Delete per Bakazaka. Also WP:WHYN explains that significant coverage is required so that we can write an article...

have standard criteria for creating a standalone article; see WP:GNG and WP:WHYN. This article also fails to meet WP:OR. HurricaneEdgar 05:17, 17 April 2026...

providing sufficient reliable coverage to develop a balanced account per WP:WHYN, we should not have an entry--not about any subject really but most especially...

isn't much cricket or badminton coverage in the US. Per the guideline WP:WHYN: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

some indication of what is important but we only have that single source WP:WHYN WP:INHERITORG notability isn't inherited from the bombing event coincidentally...

supplement to WP:N, has absolutely no bearing on a disambiguation page. Per WP:WHYN, (notability guidelines) "do not, however, apply to pages whose primary purpose...

biography cannot be written based merely off of the subject's own quotes. Per WP:WHYN, significant coverage is needed "so that we can actually write a whole article...

Per GNG: "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention". Per WP:WHYN: "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually...

discusses the subject in depth, to be able to build a bio? Please see WP:WHYN, as no RS sources have been presented at this AfD, apart from assertions...

information in the world for a full article on this (see the first point of WP:WHYN). Ibadibam (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC) Comment - There are two monthly...

sources"). This is a 2006 unsourced BLP that could have been BLP-prodded. WP:WHYN states: Editors apply notability standards to all subjects to determine whether...

coverage about the subject. None of this is useful for notability per WP:WHYN. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC) Keep - If we started...

full article which fullfills the requirements of both WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WHYN. Therefore notability is established and there is no reason for deletion...

coverage of the college found nothing. No coverage, no article. See FAILN; cf. WHYN. Rebbing 11:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Delete notability not established. Article...

WP:BEFORE search) together can provide enough commentary to fullfill WP:WHYN and WP:NOTPLOT. Much of the commentary is related to the relationship with...

answered what I saw in here. Yes, and it exists in other discussions. See WP;WHYN "Because these requirements are based on major content policies, they apply...

either. On top of that, I also think this subject also does not meet WP:WHYN. Quoting the guideline: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources...

Question to me is, does that add up to significant coverage and satisfy WP:WHYN, or does it basically exemplify the dangers of a pseudobio? (Reminds me of...

enough to warrant her own article. Fails WP:NACTOR. Severe failure of WP:WHYN as well. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 06:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC) Sk8erPrince (talk)...

Brazilian journal, thus fullfilling the minimum requirements of WP:GNG/WP:WHYN after all. And there are more shorter mentions in various sources, like The...

still be a non-stubby article which also fullfills WP:NOTPLOT. Therefore, WP:WHYN and thus WP:N is fullfilled. It is not relevant with regard to notability...

commentary fullfilling WP:NOTPLOT which will be long enough to fullfil WP:WHYN and therefore WP:GNG. Daranios (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC) Keep Per others...

secondary sources independent of the subject to pass WP:GNG/WP:BASIC. Per WP:WHYN, we need such coverage in order to create a whole article without policy...

unsure about that. Fortguy (talk) 08:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC) Delete Per WP:WHYN there aren't enough sources to support an article.--Pontificalibus 09:08...

paragraph could be written besides plot summary, thus a merge is appropriate (WP:WHYN). Besides that, I note that the book/film comparison is entirely unsourced...

in large part to ensure that there is enough material for an article (WP:WHYN). Here, the article even as it stands (the insane festival list aside) does...

analysis of hacker group Anonymous in a source like [7]. As explained in WP:WHYN, without significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, we can't...

evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. Per WP:GNG, WP:WHYN and WP:EVENTCRIT, we would need significant secondary coverage and/or in-depth...

independent of the subject in order to write an article that complies with policy (WHYN). wjematherplease leave a message... 10:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC) Relisted...

more have been found. Thus fullfills the basic requirements of WP:GNG/WP:WHYN, so I see no reason for and no benefit in deletion. Daranios (talk) 11:01...

2020 (UTC) After adding information for the brand new WHYN-HD2/W247DL ("97.3 The Beat") to the WHYN-FM article, I've noticed that the Infobox now doesn't...

is to allow Wikipedians to write a whole article about a subject, per WP:WHYN, and if we cannot prove there is in-depth coverage about the company (not...

many "unreliable" sources stating the very same in unison. To mention WP:WHYN: With a reliable source there should be enough information available to write...

the article about the founder. Nnev66 (talk) 17:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC) WP:WHYN states We require multiple sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced...

few sentences supported only by statistics, and both WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:WHYN make it clear that this unacceptable.----Pontificalibus 11:34, 1 April 2021...

Bangladeshi films of 1972, as an alternative to deletion, and considering WP:WHYN's advice: "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources...

should be about the estate itself. The reasons for this are given at WP:WHYN - we need this in order to be able to write a balanced article. So even if...

at the 1956 Summer Olympics#Athletics as an alternative to deletion – WP:WHYN and WP:SPORTCRIT both respectively state that "We require the existence of...

seeking it. Sammyrice (talk) 23:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC) It doesn't. See WP:WHYN (and other relevant policies and guidelines); only adequate sources can confer...

constitute notability. They are all basically… 'This is what the project is.' WP:WHYN This is reflected by the lack of depth in this article, which is essentially...

program, along the same lines. Passes GNG and the spirit behind it at WP:WHYN: we have plenty of sources to write a substantial, balanced encyclopedia...

(UTC) WP:BURO even if your assertion was true, but ... WP:NOTPLOT and WP:WHYN clearly observe that if the only content we can source is plot details, we...

(UTC) Keep SF Signal does appear in a number of secondary sources. And WP:WHYN tells us that WP:GNG is in place "so that we can actually write a whole article...

covered so that more than "half a paragraph or a definition of that topic" (WP:WHYN) could be written. If you're so intend on proving the topic is notable, then...

aren't sufficient source to write a biography, nor will there ever be. WP:WHYN explains we require significant coverage"so that we can actually write a...

together are enough to write a non-stubby article, therefore fullfilling WP:WHYN. WP:ITSNOTABLE is thus no longer an issue. If that's not considered enough...

delete or redirect to Smoker. Fails both WP:BIO (even with expansion) and WP:WHYN. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC) Automated comment: This...

to the images of his numerous arrests that he has had over the years. WP:WHYN, which states the reasons for the notability guidelines, is confirmed at...

fails these two basic requirements. Those who disagree may wish to read WP:WHYN. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC) 100% agreed with Kobe. I...

can supplement that. So we have a full article, therefore fulfilling WP:WHYN. Furthermore there are several Bell of Lost Souls web articles dealing fully...

event is not considered significant coverage. The guideline also says in WP:WHYN: We require the existence of at least one secondary source so that the article...

notice. Thanks, Lourdes 08:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC) Comment. One reads at WP:WHYN: "We require the existence of at least one secondary source so that the article...

not [...] posting indiscriminate collections of information. (shortcut WP:WHYN). The formulation of this page is the very definition of WP:INDISCRIMINATE...

significant coverage in reliable sources is necessary is explained at WP:WHYN. And I think it goes without saying that "I assume sources exist" isn't a...

character represents in the series to fullfill the requirements of both WP:WHYN and WP:NOTPLOT. The nomination reads a lot like it was considering only the...

discusses the subject itself and I have to regrettably put a delete here per WHYN. Nothing much in any books either nor in any of the newspaper archives I...

independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a reasonably...

recently toured London. (Sure there are news articles about it, but See WP:WHYN and WP:SPIP.) But the problem is that there are two separate pearls. Are...

Greek music in the United States. Whether you can build an article per WP:WHYN I have no comment on. The reliable sources I have access to (Sutton, Spottswood)...

(talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. See WP:WHYN for why we require indepth coverage to have an article, and Lucky Patcher...

doesn't say that anything above 1kb can't be merged. Don't forget that WP:WHYN explicitly states that "We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources...

with you on GNG requiring mulitple sources - see the fifth bullet in WP:WHYN, which starts "We require multiple sources so that...". --FyzixFighter (talk)...

the article.--79.183.203.120 (talk) 18:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC) Per WP:WHYN you need at a bare minimum 2 significant references, three is preferred,...

collectively contain enough material to fullfill the requirements of both WP:WHYN and WP:ALLPLOT, so these are problems that can be solved by normal editing...

where it says "find sources". Landpin (talk) 06:34, 14 August 2025 (UTC) wp:WHYN says "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can...

article if it is just used, and that's the decisive part according to WP:WHYN. Starting from a section in a character list and expanding from there would...

definition of that topic" and more than "a few sentences", fullfilling WP:WHYN as well as WP:NPLOT. That's enough for me. Or, approaching it from the other...

look back at the intent rather than the letter, which is spelled out in WP:WHYN: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

article if it is just used, and that's the decisive part according to WP:WHYN. Starting from a section in a character list and expanding from there would...

to Zambia at the 1964 Summer Olympics as an alternative to deletion – WP:WHYN and WP:SPORTCRIT both respectively state that "We require the existence of...

generally don't consider SB Nation reliable. Also consider guideline WP:WHYN: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

presented above are merely passing mentions and do not meet SIGCOV. Per WP:WHYN: "We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

Additional points: Can significant coverage be attained from only one source? WP:WHYN talks about reliable sources so I'd expect wider coverage for this album...

sourced; if kept, it would have to be trimmed down to a sentence or two.) WP:WHYN says "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about...

secondary sources a full article can be written, which fullfils both WP:WHYN and WP:NOTPLOT. E.g. The Gothic World of Anne Rice and Joss Whedon Vs. the...

aircraft." Aviationwikiflight (talk) 02:43, 11 April 2026 (UTC) Comment – WP:WHYN requires that all articles cite at least one secondary source to comply with...

merging it into something like 'list of internet phenomena' or delete. WP:WHYN requires significant coverage so as to write an encyclopedic article, not...

Lanka to the United Nations Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Per WP:WHYN, we require coverage to have an article. In this case, we don't have enough...

analysis from those sources - which in the end allow to fullfill both WP:WHYN and WP:ALLPLOT. Daranios (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Keep per Daranios's...

within the scope of our topic here, and so those four easily fulfill WP:WHYN. And they've come up in only a rather brief WP:BEFORE search. And as Sergecross73...

@LjL: The notability requirements are like that for good reasons, see WP:WHYN. Without good substantial sources, it's really not possible to write a neutral...

balanced, full-page article can't actually be written about Shah, and per WP:WHYN, a reliably-sourced full article is the goal. Shah's films Je Bho Ramrai...

of ~12 pages provide ample material upon which to base an article per WP:WHYN. The topic is therefore notable as defined by the WP:GNG and that's that...

are from The Daily Democrat, and independent newspaper. This fulfills WP:WHYN, which notes "We require the existence of at least one secondary source so...

view, which is more than "half a paragraph" or "only a few sentences" (WP:WHYN). There are now about ten paragraphs directly supported by multiple reliable...

by the mere fact that it exists, it is notable I would ask you to read WP:WHYN. Notability here is not inherited - see WP:ITSA - we need evidence. TheMagikCow...

Might not be the most talented baseball player at this time, but meets WP:WHYN in that a neutral, whole article can be written, and it's already beyond...

of stock characters. Now, it would no longer fit there, and fullfills WP:WHYN quite clearly in my view. (It also should be part of the process to look...

is little to no reliable secondary coverage to base an article on per WP:WHYN. I also consider this a WP:TOOSOON case. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:17, 18...

a notable topic sufficient for a stand alone article - see WP:NRV and WP:WHYN. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 01:58, 3 September 2016 (UTC) And, in your above post...

reception section as a basis for a non-stubby article, thus fullfilling WP:WHYN. The Paste article dedicates 2+ paragraphs to Volo, so that's not a passing...

source material to build a balanced article and thus this falls under WP:WHYN. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC) Keep. Worlds oldest man...

is accordinly removed, are we able to create a worthwhile article per WP:WHYN? I think this should be re-listed and discussion focused on these questions...

2021 (UTC) An interview is still not independent of the subject. Look up WP:WHYN: "We require that all articles rely primarily on "third-party" or "independent...

sourced reception section, there seem to be enough sources to fullfill WP:WHYN. Daranios (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC) *Delete Lets look at the sources...

insufficient to pass WP:GNG and build a policy-compliant article, per WP:WHYN. wjematherplease leave a message... 10:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC) I think there's...

fullfils WP:NOTPLOT and has enough based on secondary source to fullfil WP:WHYN, i.e. a notable topic. That said, I am not fundamentally opposed to a merge...

what should be done with them. WP:N doesn't apply to the user namespace (WP:WHYN), and I've addressed why the possible conflict of interest doesn't matter...

(9th nomination) for an example). The essential reason for coverage is WP:WHYN that we should be able to write a good article on the subject and this significant...

09:15, 31 August 2019 (UTC) Delete all These are not biographies. Per WP:WHYN "we require significant coverage in reliable sources so that we can actually...

November 2024 (UTC) The main point of requiring topics to be notable, per WP:WHYN, is to ensure that editors create articles that comply with major content...

sources that the article is required to be Wikipedia:Based upon (see also, WP:WHYN). Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC) Dear editors, I have added...

certainly not always be mentioned there). This stub is a prime example of WP:WHYN, and it fails comprehensively. In cases such as these, barely meeting the...

(UTC) Yeah need information to write an encyclopedia article with per WP:WHYN, beyond database type facts of what actor played what character. -- Green...

are at least as follows: WP:SUSTAINED WP:GNG WP:SIGCOV WP:NRV WP:NRVE WP:WHYN I'm interested in your contention about wiki definition of ad hominem argumentation...

article if it is just used, and that's the decisive part according to WP:WHYN. Starting from a section in a character list and expanding from there would...

matter of opinion, you are just reading it wrong. Lower on the page under WP:WHYN, it states, straight up, We require "significant coverage". Continuing to...

significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. (See WP:WHYN). That clearly isn't happening here. Wikipedia is the sum of all human knowledge...

significant coverage", as shown in the amount of reception fullfilling WP:WHYN. In addition, The Best of Star Wars Insider Volume 4, p. 23, Myth, Media...

any significant coverage, which we need in order to write an article (per WHYN). Without it, we have a one sentence directory/statistical listing stub that...

there is simply enough content for a stand-alone article as described in WP:WHYN. Daranios (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC) Keep as an AfD outcome per Daranios's...

not un-sourceable. SportingFlyer T·C 20:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC) Per WP:WHYN: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

passing mentions. Enough to pass the WP:GNG, and fulfill the purpose of WP:WHYN. Namely, the sources from Yahoo, Kotaku and IGN. And beyond that, there's...

WP:NCREATIVE. Orlando Davis (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC) Under the section WP:WHYN of the general Notability guideline there is a sentence that says ...multiple...

by a potential article about this topic; see the first bullet point at WP:WHYN. Apparently cockblocking has never received substantial, in-depth coverage...

demonstrate the the subject satisfies inclusion critera per WP:NRV - and WP:WHYN explains why this is so. As a BLP, according to WP:BLP, it must adhere strictly...

in Dungeons & Dragons. But I think it's not really a problem to beat WP:WHYN when using the sources discussed so far (and expect there are more out there)...

notability both in the colloquially sense, and, more importantly, for WP:WHYN: if this musician had been covered in smaller papers in, say, Illinois, Texas...

together with a reasonably-size description = plot-summary, fullfilling WP:WHYN should not be a problem. Finding more sources is always good, but I did not...

to secondary sources, nowhere near the WP:STUB threshold. That's what WP:WHYN demands, and therefore notability is established. Transporting over all content...

substantial article" is "all t[hat] is required by []WHYN." A cursory reading of WHYN reveals that WHYN: (1) doesn't require anything itself but merely explains...

out the unreferenced (i.e. based on primary sources) parts. That's what WP:WHYN requires in that regard. Daranios (talk) 08:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Which...

notability criteria exists so we can write a whole article about a subject - WP:WHYN. I do not believe it is our job to determine whether the subject did something...

more substantial, based on independent secondary RS, which is of course WP:WHYN in the first place. Moreover, there's more to add that I have not yet, with...

book, and contain enough material to write an article about the book (WP:WHYN). Although the sources contain the narrative "bad boy writes book", they...

not exist in a vacuum, and were created for a specific purpose. Read WP:WHYN. They are not there simply to create hurdles for hurdles sack. They are designed...

notability requirement "are not retained as separate articles." WP:FAILN. See WP:WHYN for an explanation of why this is. In this case, there is virtually no qualifying...

enough of commentary in total to support a full article in the vein of WP:WHYN. And yes, all of this could be partitioned among the individual relevant...

Milowent: the general reasons for the notability requirement are specified on WP:WHYN. Beyond that, I think the notability requirement is necessary to make Wikipedia...

the coverage, we need some context to be able to write an article per WP:WHYN. Of course, there are also specific notability guidelines, but we can't mix...

Lankhmar. Can anyone else? One relevant question with regard to notability/WP:WHYN here would be if the gods of Lankhmar should be considered a subtopic contributing...

with a reception section, which is short, but beyond stub length. So WP:WHYN is fulfilled, no need for deletion. The additional sources can be used to...

ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 07:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Weak Keep per WP:WHYN and doesn't fall under WP:NOT. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:11, 14 April...

sizable grant and the sufficient material to write a complete entry—per WP:WHYN. Innisfree987 (talk) 03:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC) Very weak keep. As nom...

and the lone game he played in, and little about Jones. The guideline WP:WHYN seems relevant: We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so...

that rank! -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:WHYN. The reason why we have our notability guidelines is that we are able to...

she meets GNG, and we can write a decent size article to meet guideline WP:WHYN. This should not set a precedent for every sportspersons' spouse or parent...

significant coverage that goes beyond a "definition of the topic" per WP:WHYN (ie plot summary). GNG is not met. Given how most of them only replace primary...

accusations about the quality of education offered at the school. However, WP:WHYN says: "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources...

when discounting sources which do not confer notability, which means WP:WHYN is fullfilled, which means that notability is established. Thanks to the...

merely plot summaries (which don't qualify as significant coverage per WP:WHYN) for a few entries. Agree with nominator as to why such lists are not needed...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article breaches WP:WHYN: "We require the existence of at least one secondary source so that the article...

'multiple' means 'two and in'. This is turning the guideline on its head. WP:WHYN explains further why the current coverage of the subject is insufficient...

FAQ. So together in my view there is plenty enough material to fullfill WP:WHYN. Daranios (talk) 10:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC) @Daranios Not bad. I'll ping...

mean not less than two independent, reliable sources. Technically, per WP:WHYN, "We require the existence of at least one secondary source," note that it...

this was not a mere short-term interest; by the requirements reiterated in WHYN; and by the obvious intent of NEXIST as simply a directive to potential AfD...

as those provide the most objective evidence of notability", and per WP:WHYN, "We require the existence of at least one secondary source so that the article...

subject-specific notability guideline (SNG). Also, the principle for WP:WHYN's requirement for SIGCOV is so we can actually write a whole article, rather...

[additional criteria] does not guarantee that a subject should be included."); cf. WHYN. Ultimately, the notability requirement isn't about whether or not someone...

After further study of of WP:NACADEMIC , WP:PROF#C1 and in particular WP:WHYN I’ve come to concur, within the bounds of these guidelines the article doesn’t...

obituaries cited by James500, on inspection, meet the requirements of WP:WHYN - just enough information from reliable secondary sources to write an article...

balance plot summary are enough to write an article which both fullfils WP:WHYN and WP:NOTPLOT. Reception still would not be very long, though, so it may...

while they might not be enough on their own to build the article (per WP:WHYN), I would argue they are when supplementing the aforementioned sources. MoonJet...

verifiable thoughts. It's in no way WP:SPIP and adequately satisfies WP:WHYN. Regards.DEOL [[User:Adeoluakintunde|Adeoluakintunde]] ([[User talk:Adeoluakintunde|talk]])...

of Wikipedia. In looking through the reasons for notability policies WP:WHYN, I can tick all the boxes: *"significant coverage" so that we can actually...

these sources as being adequate to satisfy the notability requirements. (WP:WHYN) Traumnovelle (talk) 06:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Delete; I agree with Traumnovelle's...

veteran. To make either WP:BLP1E or WP:BIO1E applicable (or WP:PAGEDECIDE/WP:WHYN/WP:FAILN if neither), this article should be preferably redirected to Survivor:...

criteria] does not guarantee that a subject should be included."); NRVE; cf. WHYN. The closest thing to a qualifying source is the Fleshbot piece, but a single...

that joke as recommended reading in a couple old textbooks still fails WP:WHYN as that is not very significant IMHO, there are literally thousands of hand...

I for that matter). That could add up to an entry that diverges from WP:WHYN's important guidance that multiple secondary sources are necessary "so that...

of editorial judgment and after considering WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE and WP:WHYN) it appears to me that the available sourcing isn't consistent with what...

also fullfils WP:ALLPLOT, which means this is notable in accordance with WP:WHYN after all. As discussed above none of these commentaries is very long, but...

these constitute the "significant coverage" required by WP:GNG. (See WP:WHYN for details.) I cannot find evidence to prove that this computer program...

a person with significant accomplishments. Because the conditions of WP:WHYN are met, I believe this encyclopedia is more comprehensive when this topic...

only presumes notability of Paralympic medal winners. Per the guideline WP:WHYN: We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually...

find any relevant interviews for him. This subject also does not meet WP:WHYN. Quoting the guideline: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources...

guidelines. But at the end of the day, the reason for those guidelines--WP:WHYN--is to make sure we're providing readers with a reliable account. And I have...

situation as well. No material to build a functional bio article; see WP:WHYN. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC) There is plenty of reliable...

nobody has argued it meets either. And this article is a stub no less. Per WP:WHYN guideline: "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that...

sources have already been severely criticized in the article talk page. Per WP:WHYN, "We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually...

any significant coverage, which we need in order to write an article (per WHYN). Without it, we have a two sentence directory/statistical listing stub that...

deletion/Palestinian local elections, 2012, which was kept. I base my opinion mainly on WP:WHYN, which requires third-party sources so it is possible to write a fair and...

deleted. One reason Wikipedia has notability criterion, as explained at WP:WHYN: We require that all articles rely primarily on "third-party" or "independent...

(which is partly what the notability criteria are there to ensure: cf. WP:WHYN). But since in this case sufficient sources have been found and you've added...

01:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC) Delete or merge with LGBT#Criticism_of_the_term. WP:WHYN: If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about...

significant way, thus fullfilling the minimum requirements of WP:GNG and WP:WHYN. There are also many secondary sources which comment on the character in...

policy. BMK (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC) BMK, I point you to WP:WHYN; you already seem familiar with the GNG part of N, but please note; "Editors...

February 2017 (UTC) Perhaps it would be good for some editors to be aware of WP:WHYN as well. We know these bracelets are important to whichever denominations...

Collectively the sourced content seems to fullfill the requirements of WP:GNG/WP:WHYN. Being a "fascinating, complex character" and "a beloved character" don't...

same article until it has been peer reviewed and expanded enough to meet WP:WHYN. Sk8erPrince (talk) 01:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Page has been deleted by...

information in reliable secondary sources, I am going for a delete. Per WP:WHYN there is simply not enough information available on which to base an article...

and conception section this constitutes a non-stubby article fulfilling WP:WHYN, which is further rounded out by the other sections. So I see neither a policy-based...

argument against WP:SIGCOV, which is explicitly why that policy exists. See WP:WHYN. AlexEng(TALK) 12:51, 5 January 2022 (UTC) For a start the argument you're...

spare right now. If that means this gets deleted again, so be it. I think WP:WHYN is worth bearing in mind. We're trying to avoid something that Wikipedia...

does not need to be the main topic of the source material. Another part, WP:WHYN, mentions that We require the existence of at least one secondary source...

single source, 300 words or prose, etc. My own interpretation relies on WP:WHYN: We have "significant coverage" when we have enough coverage to write a decent...

reliable, independent sources. He doesn't meet WP:NBASKETBALL either. Per WP:WHYN, significant coverage is needed "so that we can actually write a whole article...

WP:SIGCOV to provide more than a brief description of the neighbourhood. WP:WHYN states "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we...

alone article on Wikipeida. To see why we have this criteria please see WP:WHYN. I see that you wrote, "Even if there were no other sources (which is not...

reliable sources, without which one would not be able to meet WP:COPO, hence WP:WHYN. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC) NFRINGE applies to theories,...

your definition, he would pass WP:N. My argument is primarily based on WP:WHYN, which is relevant reading and explains how the WP:N policy is based on WP:V...

From these sources, you can derive only a few sentences of content. Per WP:WHYN, this is not enough to show notability. Now its true that a lot of cartoon...

alone article on Wikipeida. To see why we have this criteria please see WP:WHYN. I see that you wrote, "Even if there were no other sources (which is not...

as I think she fails WP:NACTOR. Also fails WP:WHYN and WP:BIO.................... WP:NACTOR, and WP:WHYN both are under notability issues while WP:BIO...

English-speaking world should have its own English Wikipedia article? WP:WHYN states "Editors apply notability standards to all subjects to determine whether...

of articles by him but nothing about him. I am using the rationale at WP:WHYN here that we require reliable sources so that we are able to write an NPOV...

actor's article *should not* be a permastub; that violates WP:WHYN. Furthermore, WP:WHYN is an actual policy, while Wikipedia:Permastub is just an essay...

from the nominated article was pasted over by the nominator. I also find WP:WHYN important, namely why we need SIGCOV: We require "significant coverage" in...

reliable sources do not consider the topic noteworthy, neither do we. WP:WHYN has good answers as to why we have these policies in place. People who want...

example of an article about an organization is Seacology. Contrast it and WP:WHYN with the reliable and independent information available about Cyclingworks...

as "significant coverage" going beyond "a definition of that topic" (WP:WHYN). Source 8 contains nothing "more than a trivial mention", indeed, a single...

of the station from which to build an article so this fails GNG (see also WHYN); the substantive coverage in the sources is mostly of the line. As it stands...

know, it's a close call. Haukur (talk) 13:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC) per WP:WHYN "We require multiple sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced article...

can and been created, not just a definition, per the first bullet in WP:WHYN, and merging the topic into another subject does not appear viable. Furthermore...

that editors create articles that comply with major content policies" (WP:WHYN). On what do we base the content of an article if all we have is verification...

treatment in secondary sources to write an article that can fullfill WP:WHYN and WP:ALLPLOT, I think having such an article is just fine and in keeping...

we just don't have enough here to justify the separate article. From WP:WHYN, "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about...

(UTC) Keep: As per above. Zhang 18:22, 11 April 2026 (UTC) Comment – WP:WHYN requires that all articles cite at least one secondary source to comply with...

don't see enough RS at the moment to be able to write an article per WP:WHYN nor enough significant coverage to pass GNG. Should someone be able to later...

"sourceable". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC) WHYN is not as such a part of the guideline.  Historically, it is an idea rejected...

major content policies, including WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:NOT. See WP:WHYN. Fame or importance has nothing to do with notability.--Antigng (talk) 02:35...

from the Los Angeles Times and The Orange County Register). This fails WP:WHYN, which states that we need ample coverage so "that we can actually write...

stub, ergo this topic fulfills the requirements of notability WP:GNG/WP:WHYN. Additionally, while the BLAR claims that trying to find sources has proven...

relevant portion of WP:N to understand this distinction are WP:NRV and WP:WHYN. I'll grant you that the current lead of the policy could be drafted better...

is commendable. But, please, see WP:GNG for guidelines on notability. WP:WHYN explains why those policies exist and WP:RELIABLE explains what valid sources...

shouldn't be all plot. Jclemens (talk) 04:55, 16 April 2025 (UTC) From a WP:WHYN perspective it is to some extent a moot point whether sources that solely...

WP:SIGCOV in the sense of providing enough info to write an article. From WP:WHYN, the requirement for SIGCOV is practical, we can actually write a whole article...

aspects of the character by various secondary sources, thus fulfilling WP:WHYN/notability requirements. We have a not-so-short article with lots of non-plot...

notability. Maybe I'm misinterpreting its intent, but WP:N's sections WP:GNG, WP:WHYN, and WP:SPIP lead me to the that conclusion. "We require that all articles...

there articles certainly shouldn't be deleted outright. However, the WP:WHYN section of WP:N also makes it clear that significant coverage is required...

hundreds of people who don't even arguably meet the GNG, and I think WP:WHYN explains why that's a poor idea. Tongchangya thus doesn't meet NPOL, and...

fails these two basic requirements. Those who disagree may wish to read WP:WHYN. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC) 100% agreed with Kobe. I...

make it clear that significant coverage in reliable sources is needed. WP:WHYN explains why we can't have an article consisting of a few sentences based...

essentially a WP:PSEUDO. The reason for our notability guidelines is WP:WHYN -so that we can write a good article about the subject without violating...

first place as you are asserting? In any event, I invite you to read the WP:WHYN section, specifically, the whole point of significant coverage: We require...

when we can write a decent one, and not have articles when we can't. WP:WHYN explains the goal. If you can write decent encyclopedia articles, with >50%...

actually want this. Fundamentally, what we need for any article (see WP:WHYN) is an independent reliable source about the subject. University websites...

Considering a one or two line mention as a significant coverage is a mockery of WP:WHYN. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Weak keep per WP:HEY...

This is WP:TOOSOON. Third party sources are specifically required per WP:WHYN and I am unable to find any at the moment. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:38, 2...

recepetion section to balance plot summary even if that is not very long. So WP:WHYN is fullfilled and I see no reason for merge or even deletion. I also wonder...

article. No indication of notability at all. Fails WP:NBIO, WP:NACTOR, WP:WHYN, WP:BASIC and WP:SIGCOV. Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:22, 26 October 2019 (UTC)...

WP:IINFO apply? When doesn't it? What is the motivation of the policy? (cf. WP:WHYN) Does anyone have a clear idea of that? If we have some way to agree to that...

PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010Talk 16:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:WHYN -- no independent reliable sources sufficient to build an article. K.e.coffman...

more than 43kB and 1,600 words certainly appears to prima facie satisfy WP:WHYN ("we can actually write a whole article" that is more than half a paragraph...

(talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. See WP:WHYN for why we require indepth coverage to have an article, and Lucky Patcher...

because there are other aspects of WP:N not addressed in NSPORT, such as WP:WHYN, that should be taken into consideration. --GoneIn60 (talk) 20:20, 4 February...

significance. Sources are not there to build a balanced article (see: WP:WHYN), as they are routine industry coverage and award nomination materials. Does...

writeup is very brief. None of this is significant coverage. If we go by WP:WHYN, there is clearly not enough sources for us to be able to write a proper...

can easily fulfill the requirements for "more than half a paragraph" of WP:WHYN. Daranios (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Daranios, "The Klingons as Homeric...

subject, but what we have in my view is enough to fullfill WP:ALLPLOT, WP:WHYN and therefore WP:GNG. And it's enough in volume that this seems better as...

MAJOR WP:RECENTISM problem. This is an article about a historic ship. Per WP:WHYN: We require the existence of at least one secondary source so that the article...

delete !voters who also noted relevant statements such as WP:NRVE and WP:WHYN, statements that have not been disagreed with, which is especially concerning...

every article should be WP:GNG per WP:WHYN.----Pontificalibus 07:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC) GNG and N (to which WHYN redirects) completely contradict each...

accompanying the additional criteria and with support from the reasoning given in WHYN, the additional criteria like PORNBIO should not be used to find notability...

subject by the source must be considered." WP:ORGDEPTH. As stated in WP:WHYN, "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually...

notability requirement "are not retained as separate articles." WP:FAILN. See WP:WHYN for an explanation of why this is. In this case, there is virtually no qualifying...

not enough coverage to be able to write a verifiable NPOV article per WP:WHYN and hence it should be deleted. The musical achievements actually indicate...

secondary sources. WP:WHYN is still a part of WP:N. There is no proof that it has been "rejected as part of the guideline" proper. WP:WHYN is not circular....

constitute notability. They are all basically… 'This is what the project is.' WP:WHYN This is reflected by the lack of depth in this article, which is essentially...

22 October 2017 (UTC) Unscintillating, perhaps you should go and read WP:WHYN, and then read the notability policies again as you clearly don't understand...

..", I was referring to Mr. Guye's rationale, which is backed up by WP:WHYN, that an article of only a few sentences does not qualify for a separate...

convince me that this is a notable astronaut. It seems to me all the WP:WHYN concerns are met. We can write a whole article and not just a stub. We know...

birth is unknown. A technical SNG pass does not guarantee an article; see WP:WHYN. Minimum sourcing should be met; BLPs deserve better than this article. Moreover...

or two of encyclopedic, relevant, properly-sourced -content: compare WP:WHYN's admonition that "[w]e require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources...

doesn't say that anything above 1kb can't be merged. Don't forget that WP:WHYN explicitly states that "We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources...

should be about the estate itself. The reasons for this are given at WP:WHYN - we need this in order to be able to write a balanced article. So even if...

see nothing in WP:WHYN that could possibly impugn the notability of this department. (I think it is also worth pointing out that WHYN is at most describing...

either. -- Ollie231213 (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC) Merge per WP:WHYN (see footnote 1). If a larger article provides better context and maintainability...

and covers the subject in detail makes the objection moot. WP:GNG and WP:WHYN are clear about this. Yes, having one source is not the greatest (maybe to...

lead, which makes the article fall under the problems in WP:PERMA and WP:WHYN. Yosemiter (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH...

@LjL: The notability requirements are like that for good reasons, see WP:WHYN. Without good substantial sources, it's really not possible to write a neutral...

and in detail. At best, can be deleted & redirected to Elegant Angel; WP:WHYN is applicable. Please also see Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2016_October_9...

is the only reason why it fails to establish such criteria (WP:GNG or WP:WHYN which clarifies this right in the first point) but nothing better demonstrates...

enough material for more than "half a paragraph". Therefore they fullfill WP:WHYN, as well as WP:NBIO, even if they are individually short: "If the depth of...

the subject, per WP:WHYN. In this case, a redirect to a list is appropriate. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC) WHYN is a part of the rationale...

to the images of his numerous arrests that he has had over the years. WP:WHYN, which states the reasons for the notability guidelines, is confirmed at...

WVTC Jack FM KTAR-FM KTXZ KTZR (AM) CKIC-FM KNHC WEDC KBLX-FM KNWZ KPFA WHYN (AM) WJIT WKFS WKXQ (defunct) WQOP 4RGK Juice 107.2 KPET Talksport WECK WSDM...

satisfy GNG. This is literally the only somewhat good coverage I found. Per WP:WHYN, we definitely don't have enough here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:27, 6 October...

that "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view". The guideline WP:WHYN further states: We require that all articles rely primarily on "third-party"...

anything even close to satisfying the goal of balanced coverage described at WP:WHYN. (For clarity: I make this remark with regard to the GNG case, because I...

there are sufficient reliable third-party sources to write an article per WP:WHYN.--Pontificalibus 08:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC) Delete: Notability is not "very...

can't actually write a decent encyclopedia article. This article fails WP:WHYN: it is not a subject about which enough verifiable information can be found...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I fail to see how this actor meets WP:NACTOR, WP:WHYN and WP:GNG. Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC) - User has been...

sourced; if kept, it would have to be trimmed down to a sentence or two.) WP:WHYN says "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about...

the 2001 Central American Games#Women as an alternative to deletion – WP:WHYN and WP:SPORTCRIT both respectively state that "We require the existence of...

not enough source material to build a bio article, thus falling under WP:WHYN. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

reception and significance only adds up to a few sentences-long article, per WP:WHYN, it's mergeable. Could you please point to a specific page number for Stars...

no third party sources, it is difficult to write an NPOV article per WP:WHYN. Accordingly, I think I will go with a TNT delete. --Lemongirl942 (talk)...

insufficient to pass WP:GNG and build a policy-compliant article, per WP:WHYN. We need to demonstrate coverage exists now, and only one of the sources...

notability is not temporary; it is sustained (proven substantial). Somehow, WP:WHYN and WP:NPF explain attempts to limit number of articles about low-profile...