Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means that people can check that facts or claims correspond to reliable sources. Wikipedia's content is determined...
Click to read more »the PROD, of course... Sandstein 17:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Delete No verfiability or notability. --Porqin 17:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:V....
Click to read more »android79 00:01, 11 October 2005 (UTC) Vanity page; no hits on Google, no verfiability. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:17, 10 October 2005 (UTC) Delete (to keep...
Click to read more »parties, but ultimately, I can't find any establishment of notability or verfiability, so I'm reluctantly placing it here. --Bachrach44 16:24, 10 May 2006...
Click to read more »November 2006 (UTC) Delete thinly disguised link farm, and no sources for verfiability. -- Whpq 15:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC) Delete spam. Nuttah68 13:03, 10...
Click to read more »the debate was DELETE. Articles on rumour and maybe are not up to WP:Verfiability. If someone somewhere has published this speculation in a reliable source...
Click to read more »--james(talk) 13:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Doubt subject meets WP:BIO 500 g-hits. Verfiability problem in that there are no cited sources. :) Dlohcierekim 13:21, 14...
Click to read more »AdelaideRandel 05:01, 4 November 2005 (UTC) Delete as per above. Lack of verfiability & suspected hoax. Eddie.willers 05:29, 4 November 2005 (UTC) Keep I saw...
Click to read more »reason for deletion), the article's subject fails the notability and verfiability criteria. None of the businesses he supposedly founded seem to meet the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Article makes no attempt to establish notability or even verfiability. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 15:12, 12 November 2005 (UTC) Delete per nom and...
Click to read more »through a successful deletion discussion in 2011, right? The notablity and verfiability issues that were mentioned in the first discussion still stand. I found...
Click to read more »no information out there on the man, aren't there some concerns about verfiability? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC) I'm hoping the AfD catches...
Click to read more »science Ko works on, Kappa and the nominator has pointed to lack of verfiability, etc. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC) Delete. I've lived...
Click to read more »With regard to the issues raised: 1) if it lacks sources, source it; 2) verfiability is hardly an issue since there is only one source (so see number 1 again)...
Click to read more »has been a rewrite, but there still is a consensus to delete based on verfiability and notability concerns. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:08, 19 August 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »have covered everything and that the information I have provided is accurate and verfiable. Thanks, Ranamourtada (talk) 09:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »doesn't assert notability and has no reliable 3rd party sourcing for verfiability. Also Wiki is not an advertisement for "Such as YouTube, Myspace, Google...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete, due to verfiability and notability problems. Davewild (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Matthew...
Click to read more »the sources, most of which are in French. I recommend you review WP:Verfiability#Non-English sources (if you haven't already done so) and do what you...
Click to read more »(it is unreferenced, links to myspace, doesn't establish notability or verfiability of the subject, etc.), and perhaps consider the Slow Motion Crash as...
Click to read more »10 albums is immaterial. The essence of notability for a Wikipedia is verfiability not truth. No references have been provided that establish any of the...
Click to read more »of fiction, whether they be books, films, songs, or video games. Thus verfiability in primary and secondary sources is what matters. No one would seriously...
Click to read more »3rd party sources". I've found nothing since to support notability nor verfiability so have to add those to my original reasoning. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:27...
Click to read more »listed, I'd be suspicious of the whole thing. At the very least, fails verfiability. -- Fan-1967 14:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete per above. I tagged...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete due to verfiability and notability concerns. Davewild (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC) JCB...
Click to read more »sorry, but the information here is so far out of encyclopedic format and verfiability, that it would be better off to start over. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 23:00...
Click to read more »July 2006 (UTC) Huh? --mboverload@ 19:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Explicit verfiability trumps vague recollection, I believe he's saying. --Calton | Talk 01:09...
Click to read more »or add to a general list of Bionicle characters due to notability and verfiability as will encyclopedic interest, i.e. per Wikipedia:Five pillars such articles...
Click to read more »research list. I am confident that any notable beach will have ample verfiability to meet WP guidelines.--Mike Cline (talk) 11:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) Self-serving, non-notable band. No verfiability, no sources, violation of WP:NOT (As in Wikipedia is not a crystal ball)...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Delete Very poor for mainspace, and does not follow NPOV or verfiability. All of the article is OR. Consider this line: Croc's World is a 2D platform...
Click to read more »reason for cleanup, not deletion. Deletion only depends on notability/verfiability, not to be confused with as Klausness points out, with verified. GizzaDiscuss...
Click to read more »NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC) Delete -- per failure of verfiability and WP:GNG. Four sentences in Warren Chaney's small hometown newspaper...
Click to read more »a false website?) and a snail-mail address. If you want to check the verfiability, check whether the snail-mail address is faked or not. The article just...
Click to read more »regardless of the behaviour issues the subject fails our notability and verfiability guidelines. Though the article contains lots of "references" they are...
Click to read more »difficult. So, to me, it seems the question here calls for a balance between Verfiability and/or Notability vs Comprehensive and leading resource. And one more...
Click to read more »of the major academic/science electronic resources. I see no signs of verfiability, and the user who posted the information has only provided un-useful...
Click to read more »be non-notable.John Z (talk) 03:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC) Keep - a Verfiable stub providing history & background. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 04:21, 14 September...
Click to read more »policies and guidelines seems to have been made. Seriously lacking in verfiability through reliable 3rd party sourcing (though I did note that it isn't...
Click to read more »station Rapido (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Keep Article has multiple verfiable second party sources, including detailed coverage by Pitchfork Media and...
Click to read more »by Chumbawamba. -- MatthewDBA 16:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC) Delete non verfiable. Abstrakt 19:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Unverified...
Click to read more »mind the number of authors. I found a source that would probably meet Verfiability on google scholar[1]. But it is not a strong paper and significantly...
Click to read more »like I said before, reformatting this article still wouldn't fix the verfiability and notability problems of the subject. This series hasn't been covered...
Click to read more »verifiability can be provided. -- Natalinasmpf 5 July 2005 03:24 (UTC) Comment Verfiable via school site. Whether this makes it notable is another matter. Merge...
Click to read more »it is described as NVH. Definitely more needed to demonstrate it's a verfiable term. gren グレン 19:23, 2 September 2005 (UTC) Keep, but expand muchly (this...
Click to read more »grave. Haikupoet 02:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable, not verfiable, dubious dicdef, slang dicdef, and the only article edited by user "Desmondmorris"...
Click to read more »that? If so, let's do it. Hiding T 10:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Keep per verfiability and real world notability. It appears in a major novel and miniseries...
Click to read more »notability is not the main criterion for having an article but rather verfiability, neutrality, and no original research. This article passes all those...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete nonsense. Nateji77 08:08, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete, nonsense, verfiably false (did not play Vincent Vega in Pulp Fiction), maybe speedy as possible...
Click to read more »(UTC) okay, Delete--Soumyasch 06:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Comment, though verfiable, the guideline, WP:MUSIC/SONG states that " a song is definitely notable...
Click to read more »newspaper which I found here she still appears to fail our notability and verfiability criteria. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Keep - coverage...
Click to read more »December 2014 (UTC) Keep precedent is that almost all railway stations that verfiably do or did exist are notable, given that sources about them are usually...
Click to read more »to start somewhere and some time. It's a small article, and it's not verfiably inaccurate. -Holly_Wight 22:26, 13, August 2005 (EST) That may be, but...
Click to read more »find a few things on "Armando Aceituno" in Google, but nothing which is verfiable or reliable. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 12:17, 11 February...
Click to read more »out to have been a Kennedy assassin or something.The Land Delete, not verfiable. -- DS1953 06:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- JJay 20:14...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Keep. He's notable in North Carolina, the article is NPOV and verfiable. No reason to delete. Ground Zero 18:57, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC) Borderline keep...
Click to read more »verifiable in in RS. The suggestion by 86.17.222.157 is a good one--merge the verfiable bits into the OfficeVision article per WP:PRESERVE and to place the software...
Click to read more »deckertalk 16:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - It would seem that it is verfiable that he was Clarence Clemons manager [1]. However, there is no significant...
Click to read more »promote your own creations. Your comic has to meet the notability and verfiability guidelines to get an article in Wikipedia. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 02:47...
Click to read more »redirecting to Sony music makes no sense given the lack of notability or verfiability within the article, incubating is pointless given there is no sourcing...
Click to read more »result was snowy delete. Person doesn't exist, thus he can't be notable or verfiable with reliable sources. Sr13 05:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC) John Ipswich (edit |...
Click to read more »and sources exist. "never heard of it" is not a good deletion argument. Verfiable sources appear adequate. Dlohcierekim 10:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Prankers...
Click to read more »Delete: That's one good source. But I can't find any other independent, verfiable sources and don't think it meets WP:GNG.Jimsteele9999 (talk) 01:22, 9...
Click to read more »Wrestling. JD[don't talk|email] 15:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC) Delete. Not verfiable, seems to be a hoax/backyard thing. JPD (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nothing to address the issues for which it was deleted (notability and verfiability). I'm not a big fan of rerunning AfDs simply because we can. Besides...
Click to read more »this seems to still lead to problems. I do not think there are enough verfiable secondary sources to sustain this article either. In conclusion, my position...
Click to read more »or add to a general list of Bionicle characters due to notability and verfiability as will encyclopedic interest, i.e. per Wikipedia:Five pillars such articles...
Click to read more »with the mounds and mounds of citations and is practical to group them. Verfiability, I believe, should be no problem here, as the titles reveal the year...
Click to read more »to Delete. AdamBiswanger1 15:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Delete - it needs verfiability which is lacking at this point. If this is addressed, then keep. -- Whpq...
Click to read more »of google evidence doesn't prove a thing. I'd expect this to be easily verfiable by simply having a Londoner Wikipedian check with the theater it was performed...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Keep It exists and its notable, based on the reliable and verfiable sources provided. Alansohn (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination...
Click to read more »mention does not require independent notability for a film, but simply verfiability of why it merited contextual inclusion elsewhere. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q...
Click to read more »have cataloged its use on their personal web sites. Besides the obvious verfiability issues, it seems like trivia, akin to having articles called List of...
Click to read more »four anchors and then say two are empty. One of those statements is not verfiable. Vegaswikian 04:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »are sources, but they aren't good enough (aren't strong, don't pass verfiability) to help this article clear hurtle of WP:GNG.Jimsteele9999 (talk) 01:06...
Click to read more »the (implicit) claim that they organized the Belorussian protests is verfiable, quite noteworthy. Keep.Septentrionalis 21:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »have been delete so to be consistent it should be deleted. Keep, big, verfiable project. Obviously various deals have been done to get it underway so...
Click to read more »under no obligation to improve it. All I know it is notable and has solid verfiable sources while you're only on deletion spree of clearly notable topics...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete as non verfiable. — Xy7 (talk) 19:07, 14 January 2008 19:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Huntington...
Click to read more »pages. Delete -- Graham ☺ | Talk 20:51, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC) Delete unless verfiable. —siroχo 04:19, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC) Delete but BJAODN. The rules still...
Click to read more »Jones together with a explanation of what it is from a verfiable first hand source. Besides a verfiable first hand source, you have the essence of the operation...
Click to read more »WP:PRESERVE. And just in case anyone wants to randomly bring up WP:V, clearly verfiable based on the book from which this character originates. FOARP (talk) 08:14...
Click to read more »concise, and source-supported. --James S. 20:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Keep, verfiable, real information. For great justice. 00:39, 5 April 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC) Keep per Wikipedia:Five pillars, i.e. verfiable information consistent with a specialized encyclopedia on words of which...
Click to read more »accredited it would not need notable because we know students attend and it is verfiable. Without accreditation we need notablity to take that slack.Arbusto 05:22...
Click to read more »be heard on the internet."), I'm quite convinced that there exits no verfiable & reliable proof of the subject's existence, let alone notability. Scientizzle...
Click to read more »to Dungeons & Dragons#Development history. Very poor article with OR, verfiability is also not present. Though the first two sections are decent, so I would...
Click to read more »rename. This is pure speculation. WP:NOT a crystal ball. There is no verfiable information about it. The Labour party one is a little different as Blair...
Click to read more »establishes the criteria? How can this statement be factually accurate and verfiable? --Tabor 23:55, 5 August 2005 (UTC) I will go ahead and removed succesfully...
Click to read more »WP:CORP says. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Keep as a verfiable school providing education to secondary school leaviing certificate. Kudpung...
Click to read more »wiki, the author of the page is an admin from the site. Notability and verfiability has clearly not been established as there is no substantial coverage...
Click to read more »unverifiable. Delete. Meelar (talk) 18:13, July 15, 2005 (UTC) Delete. Non-verfiable, not trace of this group on the web. Brand new and perhaps a vanity. -Willmcw...
Click to read more »useful information regarding sensitive issue. Many references to external verfiable sources like Times of India Tusharkumar101 (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2017...
Click to read more »with those claims. By all means, recreate the article if you can provide verfiable information beyond the definition. VG ☎ 21:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »article uses for sources), and WP:V says that the information must be verfiable and not verified. Needs work, not deletion. Pharmboy (talk) 21:16, 15...
Click to read more »is an acceptable spinoff or sub article according to multiple editors, verfiable word that in a worst case scenario could be merged and redirected without...
Click to read more »the English Wikipedia. I will consider changing my vote, if there are verfiable English references or third-party citations. Otherwise it should be crossed...
Click to read more »help clear this up. If ArThES has received any non-trivial coverage from verfiable sources that meet the reliable sources policy, please include the information...
Click to read more »(speak to me) 05:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC). Keep. Notable location with verfiable information. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:03...
Click to read more »Marshall Chess. May not be notable enough for a stand alone article, but is verfiable and relevant.--PinkBull 15:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Mgm|(talk) 11:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per others, I can't find any verfiable information on this product or the company involved. This further shows...
Click to read more »WP:GNG, but the subgenre exists and is discussed occasionally. With basic verfiability and with hard fantasy being is a plausible search term (50-100 page views...
Click to read more »and an independently compiled discography page which I trust stands as verfiable evidence of the releases that establish notability. Ac@osr 17:16, 10 October...
Click to read more »Just zis Guy you know? 10:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Delete, article is not verfiable, sourced, and appears to constitute a heavy element of original research...
Click to read more »notable but still it doesn't fulfill criteria for deletion. 2. It fulfills verfiability and reliability and a large part of notability criteria. 3. Tens of thousands...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Keep article. All 400 year-old institutions are verfiable and notable. Delete nominator as disruptive single-purpose sock account...
Click to read more »RogueNinjatalk 19:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC) delete per nom. Not notable and no verfiable sources from which to create an entry.--Yankees76 (talk) 01:59, 14 February...
Click to read more »log) Second listing for this office tower. The article does not cite any verfiable claim to notability, but I can tell you that it was designed by same firm...
Click to read more »"may" exist in those languages? The first few difficulties I foresee is verfiability. I'd also like to point out that wikiproject guidelines on notability...
Click to read more »this article for GAR as I believe it fails the "factually accurate and verfiable", "broad in coverage" and "focused" parts of the GA criteria. This article...
Click to read more »myspace page, nothing has been created yet. There are concerns about verfiability and an article about a production company with a single project that...
Click to read more »Vizjim 11:00, 19 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. Some secret societies are verfiable. This one doesn't seem to be. --Ashenai 11:03, 19 September 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »should be getting corrected in the next few days. This would address the verfiability. My question is, should this be a stub instead?tony garcia 14:15, 16...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete - Borderline G12 Speedy as well. Cannot find enough verfiable sources to suggest that this person meets WP:Music. A1octopus 20:59, 10...
Click to read more »Unsuprisingly, there aren't any sources on the article there. Notability and verfiability has clearly not been established, so delete. Otterathome (talk) 20:36...
Click to read more »JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 21:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Keep, because definitely verfiable and Wait, because editors should have more of an opportunity to improve...
Click to read more »independent sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC). Keep - Verfiable Sources - http://ridhwaan.co.za/2013/02/21/sheikh-sayed-haroon-al-azhari/...
Click to read more »or add to a general list of Bionicle characters due to notability and verfiability as will encyclopedic interest, i.e. per Wikipedia:Five pillars such articles...
Click to read more »information was. I can publish this information in order to make it "verfiable". I think it's unjust and unfair to just delete them though. Adam 15:53...
Click to read more »not for wikipedia dr.alf 11:18, 26 October 2005 (UTC) Delete. I see no verfiable connection in this article between the 'symptoms' described and their...
Click to read more »a non-notable neologism, while the article itself has no context nor verfiable sources. --Gavin Collins 08:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. The...
Click to read more »issue on remote math circles[2], which is marginally enough independent verfiability for a few basic facts about the organization in a sentence at University...
Click to read more »these sources, then source them....all of them. Otherwise, they aren't verfiable or reference and are a page of fan cruft made by a sockpuppet. - Neutralhomer...
Click to read more »article to research the subject. Also the article's contents are not verfiable and the organisation(s) is/are not notable. As such the article in question...
Click to read more »these sources, then source them....all of them. Otherwise, they aren't verfiable or reference and are a page of fan cruft made by a sockpuppet. - Neutralhomer...
Click to read more »find anything but very minor and essentially routine coverage, ie, it verfiably existed. At least one of its productions, Hey Dad..!, was very notable...
Click to read more »the south as far as possible because while it may be feasible, it's not verfiable. Even if Francs2000 is good enough to take the train up to whichever school...
Click to read more »regarded in popular culture" mean? And is "the first American fairy tale" a verfiable/citable claim? ("Some consider it the first American fairy tale" would...
Click to read more »the fails everything test. SkierRMH,08:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Keep, verfiable and interesting. Lovablebeautyme 08:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »of an article. Kurt Weber 23:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC) Delete lacks verfiability other than own website... --redstucco 09:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »immediately obvious where a reference/citation for those are. I think this verfiability aspect is important. I don't doubt the truth is presented by the editors...
Click to read more »WP:COI. Soxred 93 16:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Delete Fails notability and verfiability Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC) Do Not Delete, The Internet...
Click to read more »appear to be sourced from wikipedia. If the claims of this article were verfiable and if there were good references the article would clearly be notable...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Keep -- As per WP:CRYSTALBALL, If The Hindu itself is not a verfiable source, then I guess no source in India is verifiable, we have to delete...
Click to read more »something that did not happen. As with everything else, its notability and verfiability that decide whether we should or should not have an article about a subject...
Click to read more »Delete --Aranda56 00:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC) weak delete certainly verfiable and maintainable (except perhaps in its size), but maybe a WP:POINT about...
Click to read more »these sources, then source them....all of them. Otherwise, they aren't verfiable or reference and are a page of fan cruft made edited by a sockpuppet....
Click to read more »comment above BigDT 17:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Keep - appears to be both verfiable and notable. Why is it being considered for deletion again? --JiFish(Talk/Contrib)...
Click to read more »these sources, then source them....all of them. Otherwise, they aren't verfiable or reference and are a page of fan cruft made by a sockpuppet. - Neutralhomer...
Click to read more »April 2006 (UTC) Delete nn. Wstaffor 23:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC) Keep - verfiable, can be merged if necessary. For great justice. 23:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the chip (produced by Zilog, a 32-bit successor to the Z80, etc.) are verfiable from secondary-source directories like [1]. I haven't been able to find...
Click to read more »from what I know, unless the character himself has been the subject of verfiable non-trivial media coverage the wiki polcies are quite clear on what should...
Click to read more »off readers and editors who contribute to and are interested in this verfiable article. Sincerley, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 20:09, 7 February...
Click to read more »website of his own), I doubtful of any material that would be useful for verfiability, not alone to argue notability. I think the fact that the website that...
Click to read more »month before its official release). So gaining notability + reliable/verfiable/independent sources + WP:NOHARM & written in good faith= keep in some...
Click to read more »entry for Basic Research, the company purported to market this brand, any verfiable material on this page should be included as a subsection on that article...
Click to read more »November 2009 (UTC) No, you aren't reading closely. Did you read any of the verfiable sources I added on the page when I created it? No. Did you read what Least...
Click to read more »trolling. JuJube 23:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Keep if this is actually verfiably from Colbert, because of the large audience of the show and Colbert's...
Click to read more »— brighterorange (talk) 00:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Keep or Merge, as these are verfiable and factual information involving well-known video games, i.e definitely...
Click to read more »added and the games existence and details about the game are clearly verfiable, and notable. 3.) The subject is notable. It may even be more notable...
Click to read more »articles on mayors of other cities, and this information is notable and verfiable. Let this article develop. Kevintoronto 14:58, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC) Keep....
Click to read more »secret society is apparently so successful at being secret it isn't even verfiable, much less notable. Daniel Case 21:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as hoaxy...
Click to read more »BD2412 talk 14:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC) Strong Keep. Contains notable, verfiable (and interesting) information. --BenjaminTsai 15:16, 28 October 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »grown man.--Rmky87 22:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Delete Information not verfiable. CloudNine 12:50, 27 October 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »or add to a general list of Bionicle characters due to notability and verfiability as will encyclopedic interest, i.e. per Wikipedia:Five pillars such articles...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Strong keep this discriminate, encyclopedic, notable, and verfiable information that is indeed covered in numerous game magazines and websites...
Click to read more »deletion/Birmingham Council election, 2008. The article is fully referenced and verfiable to reliable sources including to a page on the BBC website which has always...
Click to read more »be referred back to should a similar event occur in the future and a verfiable, neutral encyclopaedia article (which I think would be possible to write...
Click to read more »what does original research become accepted fact. This was an easily verfiable trend. Second, the name is fitting of something so light-hearted. Let's...
Click to read more »series in history and so thousands of readers will be interested in this verfiable material and will be willing to edit it. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable; no verfiable, reliable sources. Bdb484 (talk) 20:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »non-English, pre-internet, Soviet topics... as long as we at least have verfiability. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:56, 26 September 2012 (UTC) Changed to keep above...
Click to read more »jumble of promo-spam and dishonest referencing masquerading as solid, verfiable content. Stalwart111 05:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Comment: I've cleaned...
Click to read more »these sources, then source them....all of them. Otherwise, they aren't verfiable or reference and are a page of fan cruft made by a sockpuppet. - Neutralhomer...
Click to read more »they don't exist; and the third is Everything2, which is as useless for verfiability purposes as Urban Dictionary which you cited above, which gives a (pretty...
Click to read more »they're not actually referenced. -- samj inout 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Verfiability of the stuff I wrote above is not in question; I had added references...
Click to read more »per Ian Pitchford. Nandesuka 21:13, 4 September 2005 (UTC) Strong Keep verfiable book by a notable author. Klonimus 23:29, 4 September 2005 (UTC) The notability...
Click to read more »Errors on Miller Chill Entry Where to go for WP community discussions on verfiability and sources How do i communicate with an administrator for deleting my...
Click to read more »Trivia - WP:FIVE Corpx 05:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Keep thorough and easily verfiable list that shows major influences on culture of a significant, award-winning/nominatd...
Click to read more »identify it as being suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, and a weak but verfiable defintion to demonstrate that this is, in some way, a culturally significant...
Click to read more »August 2006 (UTC) Keep per olivier. WP:NOT paper and this can provide verfiable, useful information for people who look up Saving Private Ryan. --Daniel...
Click to read more »are a vast number of significant AIDS conspiracy theories and they are verfiable and encyclopedic. This is not to say that the article is currently a good...
Click to read more »these sources, then source them....all of them. Otherwise, they aren't verfiable or reference and are a page of fan cruft made by a sockpuppet. - Neutralhomer...
Click to read more »reduced the article to a bare stub, redacting information which is not verfiable, and adding alternate (and possibly more correct) spellings of names....
Click to read more »true. I have no reason to believe this article is untrue, but unless verfiable sources are provided it will likely be deleted. If as the article claims...
Click to read more »Doceirias (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC) Keep as a discriminate and verfiable list and because the previous nominations was but a few days ago. Best...
Click to read more »so this one should, referencing demonstrates Notability together woth Verfiability the sources are reliable the indiscriminate unsourced pieces were removed...
Click to read more »problem with this article is the nearly complete lack of independent verfiable sources. And indeed the name is common enough to defy plain vanilla Google...
Click to read more »different styles). The important thing is the references are there to aid verfiability. If you use the references I cite (all with page numbers so the task...
Click to read more »t/c 19:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC) Delete Along with the notability and verfiability problems, I find it hard to keep an article of a subject whose defenders...
Click to read more »appears to be accurate and sources appear to be legit. Information includes verfiable clients, information and services. - Second speedy tag removal For article...
Click to read more »MuZemike (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC) Delete fails notability and verfiability, although I have to admit I'm confused by the language in the nomination...
Click to read more »crystal ball, nor is it for things made up. Further, articles must have verfiable content not composed of original research. Don't forget that articles...
Click to read more »encyclopedia gaining new users practically every minute. The article passes verfiability guidelines and has reliable primary sources, which are perfectly fine...
Click to read more »Merridew 13:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Keep. Passes our notability and verfiability requirements. Episode from a notable TV series with notable actors. References...
Click to read more »April 2008 (UTC) Keep per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate, organized, and verfiable). Any concerns can be addressed by Wikipedia:SOFIXIT. Best, --Le Grand...
Click to read more »Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source'. The article has verfiable sources and would need to be cut down to include those items only. WP:FRINGE...
Click to read more »paragraph in an article Sandstein 07:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Keep Verfiability is such B.S. We can't verify who killed JFK. That doesn't restrict us...
Click to read more »Dan 18:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. No sources. No sign of verfiable notability. IrishGuy talk 23:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC) one minor correction...
Click to read more »D'Andre is lauded for his efforts by the ACLU. I'm sure the ACLU is a verfiable source. Please help me fix this if there's anyway it can be fixed. Zodiac01...
Click to read more »Even if this is a culturally significant categorization, there is no verfiable evidence in the form of citations or a externally soourced defintion to...
Click to read more »Delete per nom, DGG. Eusebeus (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Keep as verfiable and sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des...
Click to read more »July 2007 (UTC) Delete hoax. Jon513 10:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Delete No verfiable sources; the ones listed are a misrepresentation and a smokescreen for...
Click to read more »these sources, then source them....all of them. Otherwise, they aren't verfiable or reference and are a page of fan cruft made by a sockpuppet. - Neutralhomer...
Click to read more »or add to a general list of Bionicle characters due to notability and verfiability as will encyclopedic interest, i.e. per Wikipedia:Five pillars such articles...
Click to read more »May 2008 (UTC) Keep per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate, organized, and verfiable list concerning subject from notable franchise). WP:FICT lacks consensus...
Click to read more »brisket recipe is an article and it is sourced with some great independent, verfiable sources, and then Bill Clinton tries it and loves it and tells CNN he...
Click to read more »compilation album that exists in the real world with notable music and that is verfiable. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:05, 29 March 2008...
Click to read more »" which I don't think it is. -D. Wu 05:36, 12 August 2005 (UTC) Keep, verfiable. Kappa 08:33, 12 August 2005 (UTC) Keep per Starblind. The "crystal ball"...
Click to read more »AKRadeckiSpeaketh 14:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) Because so long as it is verfiable and editors and readers believe it belongs here, the paperless encyclopedia...
Click to read more »where notability failed to become an accepted reason for deletion. It is verfiable -- the information comes from the PEI government. It is not vanity. The...
Click to read more »13 April 2006 (UTC) Delete. Yup, it's about verifiablility not truth. Verfiability from reliable sources, unlike the web forums cited in this article. So...
Click to read more »remains that there is a happy balance to be made between readibility and verfiability. I have never, not once ever, in any situation ever even once seen someone...
Click to read more »written by S Mann is just using the term or is about the term. The term is verfiable but the widespread use of the term is questionable as most literature...
Click to read more »the fact that it's only present at one university. The information is verfiable (the proposal is on the University's site, and it should be mentioned...
Click to read more »(UTC) No-one would search for these things, and there is generally no verfiable informational available about them, so the question of whether they need...
Click to read more »articles revised by ignorant editors. On the other end of the spectrum, Verfiability policies can be a double edged sword and lead to the wiki being outdated...
Click to read more »community. --- The Bethling(Talk) 04:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Merge (same) Verfiability, original research, and reliability concerns are ungrounded due to readily...
Click to read more »shouldn't. --Edcolins 08:46, May 29, 2005 (UTC) Easily passes external verfiability thresholds, obvious keep. Pcb21| Pete 12:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC) Keep based...
Click to read more »03:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC) It applies to everything on Wikipedia. Verfiability is the threshold, but thing (and people) must also be notable to be included...
Click to read more »reliable citations. Happyme22 (talk) 06:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Delete unless verfiable sources added. Also, DGG put it quite well in the previous AFD. Dlohcierekim...
Click to read more »notable character that appears in a recognizable film and novel with easily verfiable information. Moreover, the article includes some out-of universe information...
Click to read more »fails notability thresholds per WP:GNG. With no sourcing, there is no verfiable material in the Wikipedia sense of the word, so alternatives to deletion...
Click to read more »Borden, etc.). Though largely unverified at present, this is obviously verfiable, and AFD is not for articles that can be cleaned up. I don't get how this...
Click to read more »GameOgre? --Eyrian 16:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Notability is a guideline, but verfiability is policy, and there just does not seem to be any reliable sources to...
Click to read more »article on this person should not exist in the future if there is enough verfiable information to spin off from genetic fingerprinting. Jkelly 04:14, 28...
Click to read more »subject matter is 1. Notable (read wp:n to see what that means) and 2. Verfiable (wp:v) using 3. Reliable sources.(wp:rs). Most of the other issues can...
Click to read more »article to research the subject. Also the article's contents are not verfiable and the organisation(s) is/are not notable. As such the article in question...
Click to read more »(UTC) then perhaps Smeelgova will heed the message that the article needs verfiable references and will go get them for us. Can't we assume good faith? That's...
Click to read more »March 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete as re-creation of deleted material, unless verfiable sources can be provided to argue for inclusion. — Rebelguys2 talk 06:36...
Click to read more »is an article.Merkinsmum 12:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Comment It meets verfiable via the post-gazette link. The notability is the question. Is there something...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Comment that is all speculation on your part though. It's not verfiable Ydam 12:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC) Delete All the content is taken from other...
Click to read more »in a far better position to make a judgement. The references are not verfiable according to policy, myspace pages are 'self published' as are most web...
Click to read more »due to the nature of bullein boards, this information doesn't suit the verfiability piece.) Now if the names came from a verifiable news site, such as AVN...
Click to read more »per nom. JohnCD (talk) 16:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC) Keep all per being verfiable information of notable topics. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho...
Click to read more »RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Delete as not providing any verfiable information about the book itself, supported by reliable sources that...
Click to read more »only on what he personally believes is true or "fictional" and not on verfiability. E.g. He argued finally with this: *I believe key facts were verified...
Click to read more »end the madness and delete this article, merging any meager scraps of verfiable fact (if there are any to be found) into E. W. Dijkstra. -- Rangek 02:48...
Click to read more »distrubtion.Someone just keeps taking the links down straight away that are verfiable.You have no right to intefere with a studios film or anna wilding's work...
Click to read more »paper encyclopedia. The article is relatively neutral in tone, and is verfiable and referenced. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »archives. Somebody who can read Swedish could probably make the case for verfiable 3rd party coverage based on Google news. -- Whpq 16:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »our notability guidelines by having plenty of google hits indicating verfiability and popularity, which are key elements of notability. Consistent per...
Click to read more »notable and recognizable topic that is encyclopedic to editors, easily verfiable, has editors willing to work on the article, and is not original research...
Click to read more »main page is too long, and I feel the lyrics are important - and now verfiable from a trusted source (the school website) Dpatri 22:05, 29 August 2006...
Click to read more »criteria listed at Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers. There is no verfiable independent coverage on this actor. The Wikipedia article has a history...
Click to read more »kept because WP:ILIKEIT, and the claim that the article violates the verfiability policy is singularly disingenuous. WP:GNG is a guideline, not a policy...
Click to read more »and child sexual abuse. The article as it is now has been cut down to verfiable material. There may be some culturally relevant songs here, but this list...
Click to read more »clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC) What we mean by reliable and verfiable sources is something official, like a statement from her record company...
Click to read more »little relation on whether or not we should keep it. It's a school with verfiable NPOV facts referenced and no matter how the article is written that does...
Click to read more »a peek at the inclusion guidlines at WP:MUSIC and if you can find any verfiable source that meets those guidelines, I'll be happy to withdraw the nomination...
Click to read more »point out where the couple of unreferenced examples I pointed out are verfiable. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 11:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC) One entry into Rambo's...
Click to read more »paragraph of the article is WP:OR combined with WP:POV. It's claim is not verfiable. The table itself adds nothing that is not already deducible from FIFA...
Click to read more »on a specific element of a specific game. It is, however, notable and verfiable through reliable secondary sources. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho...
Click to read more »personal attacks and come up with proof that this band exists from a verfiable source. If you have no proof and continue these personal attacks, you...
Click to read more »are linked back to secondary sources. None of the inconsistencies are verfiable in their current form and I doubt they will be til someone starts their...
Click to read more »mainstream reliable coverage you shouldn't expect it to pass WP:GNG or WP:VERFIABILITY Hell in a Bucket (talk) 23:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia has a...
Click to read more »nomination), User:CyberAnth/AfD/Original Research of Wanker and non Verfiability of claims, and the failure thereof, may have something to do with this...
Click to read more »notable and recognizable topic that is encyclopedic to editors, easily verfiable, has editors willing to work on the article, and is not original research...
Click to read more »Consistent with specialized encyclopedia as covered by our first pillar. Verfiable and not original research as it does not advance a thesis. Sincerely,...
Click to read more »stuff) 22:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC) could you maybe produce some reliable, Verfiable source that asserts some claim to this stuff? And don't give us your crocodile...
Click to read more »the US House that were not elected (see WP:OUTCOMES). Also some of the verfiable material could be added to the page about the election. --Enos733 (talk)...
Click to read more »not have to do all the work on the article. If I point out Wikipedia's verfiability policy and other users refuse to follow it, their work may be removed...
Click to read more »If you find User:CyberAnth/AfD/Original Research of Wanker and non Verfiability of claims which I wrote for an AfD for Wanker to be a mere whine, I am...
Click to read more »are RS and are the more convincing refs in that they at least allow a verfiable, decently written reception section. At the other hand, none seem to directly...
Click to read more »more about wikipedia ettiquette, as well as the principle of truth vs verfiability. I think a soft ban of users from the Barrett related pages would be...
Click to read more »recent appearance in a rockumentary about Shkodra - all of these are verfiable sources. Probably should check out refs to the band again not in this...
Click to read more »these articles should be here. No substantial claim to notability, not verfiable, potential vanity page and no sources. Only source that got provided to...
Click to read more »and actresses of any variety are some of the most reliable sources for verfiable information. Currently the article passes both WP:RS and WP:V with flying...
Click to read more »@Legacypac:: a strong suggestion out here. You might have already read WP:Verfiability and WP:OR. Please read them again, especially WP:Exceptional. Please...
Click to read more »234.41 (talk) 12:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Keep all of this discriminate, verfiable, and notable material that appears both on multiple notable shows and...
Click to read more »only claim of notablility is a relationship to a notable person, any verfiable information should be appropriately presented in the article about that...
Click to read more »There is no way this is going to survive the VfD unless you include verfiable information that Richard Hanson has actually done something noteworthy...
Click to read more »source is not reverting someone elses edit, but is cleaning the article. Verfiability is the very core of Wiki and should trump disruptive accusations to protect...
Click to read more »difficult. So, to me, it seems the question here calls for a balance between Verfiability and/or Notability vs Comprehensive and leading resource. And one more...
Click to read more »research when it comes to lists, but not to articles? Every topic must be verfiable, whether it is a list or an article - hearsay that the topic can be verified...
Click to read more »this whole RfC on behalf of BQZip01, as well as the reliability and verfiability of any of the claims made within the article which seem to come from...
Click to read more »been pointed out several times, the burden of proof is on you to show us verfiable sources, not for us to prove otherwise. --khaosworks 16:16, May 26, 2005...
Click to read more »nor a publisher of "facts." Our mission is to publish knowledge that is verfiable by reliable sources, and this includes notable scientific theories. The...
Click to read more »features. Again, you cannot remove or modify sourced material as per WP:Verfiability. I have addressed your tone issue and added further sources." 10:30,...
Click to read more »"this term is a load of bollocks"). If this is improvable where is the verfiable support going to come from? In what way? The more I look into it - it...
Click to read more »alienate editors/readers who are interested in this stuff so long as it is verfiable and concerns a major television show? --164.107.222.23 19:10, 27 June...
Click to read more »individually notable, jut verifiable a masonic organiztions. to be notable, just verfiable. DGG (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Keep. I wasn't going to wade in...
Click to read more »games, a cartoon, two films, etc. Notable to humans in the real world and verfiable. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 17:16, 3 February...
Click to read more »taken place there on the article since nomination, there is now enough verfiable information in the article for it to be valid. Davewild 21:11, 7 July...
Click to read more »--Tom Edwards 15:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC) Actually I did. The only verfiable source is one quoted sentence on a forum followed by a plethora of fan...
Click to read more »re-reading the articles in question it becomes clear that there IS NO verfiable content in these articles whatsoever. Too many "weasly words" (Appears...
Click to read more »found in a few months. WP:V states that the threshold for inclusion is verfiability, not truth. If the "very notable" assertion were sourced so it could...
Click to read more »an unencyclopedic essay. Severa (!!!) 04:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC) KEEP verfiable sources, vague interpretation of "original research". content is under-nourished...
Click to read more »addition of, for example, people, theories etc. This article contains more verfiable encyclopaedic content than that. Mcewan (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2013...
Click to read more »(t) 03:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Keep per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate, verfiable, and organized). Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 03:40...
Click to read more »example, [1]), sufficient sources come up to demonstrate notability, verfiability, and provide out of universe context. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le...
Click to read more »will be a small section to respond only to issues of BLP, copyright, verfiability, civility, and other major Wikipedia concerns. This will not be used...
Click to read more »msg me 18:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC) I'm very focussed on sourcing, verfiability is the one core quality which brought me to contribute and valuing WP...
Click to read more »prevent any poor descriptions irrespective of whether the information is verfiable or not. I have recently been added to the rollback list so this should...
Click to read more »warring when there isn't a clear answer, but this was a matter where verfiably correct information was being reverted and like I said above, incorrect...
Click to read more »Sahaj Marg/Shri Ram Chandra Mission was the availability of reliable and verfiable secondary sources. Despite repeated requests by multiple editors here...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Except that my editing is supported by verfiable sources and seeks to follow neutral point of view. You would do well to...
Click to read more »by doing so? The group simply is not encyclopedic because it has not verfiable sources, so no point in mentioning it at all. Also, Squeak was not edit...
Click to read more »misrepresenting the facts. I said the information is being checked for verfiability here [[109]], and I placed the notice here [[110]]. Less than 24 hours...
Click to read more »important to note that since the nomination RS which support the notablility/verfiability have been added, including Ruddy, Austin J. (6 February 2018). "Renovating...
Click to read more »This user is incessantly adding in original research and claiming it as verfiable, and when new edits are added that don't fit with, or contradict his interpretation...
Click to read more »dispute is apparently over the correctness of sources and plagiarism and verfiability. In my opinion as a "innocent bystander", this is growing out of control...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Also just because something exists doesn't make it notable verfiable proof has to be shown. WP:ITEXISTS Dwanyewest (talk) 18:53, 22 February...
Click to read more »experience. Certainly very few people get summarily blocked for OR or verfiability issues, at least on a first offence, whereas egregious BLP violation...
Click to read more »("Springfield") or a somehow otherwise generic sense and that quote is verfiable, do we add the place to the list? At the end of the day, it just seems...
Click to read more »which this doesn't. And WP:IAR cannot possibly be invoked to overturn verfiability in this case, which is a cornerstone of writing an encyclopaedia. This...
Click to read more »and other major organizations, they decide to use it as it publishes verfiable information. Again we have come to a conclusion about Tamilnet in this...
Click to read more »is Peter just above, here is a later diff showing what he claims is "verfiable fact" was, in fact, not: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...
Click to read more »cleric with a fabricated attiibution to a Zionist, and also making a verfiably false claim about a book by Theodore Herzl. That is, I was adding to the...
Click to read more »name for Kingdom of Hungary. This is stated in virtually all reliable, verfiable sources and historical maps including Britannica 2009 and Encarta. Rjecina...
Click to read more »desired to restrict List of best-selling books to those for which there are verfiable sales figures, which mostly means books in copyright for which the publishers...
Click to read more »you've argued a bunch of AfDs that take the format, "This organisation has verfiably distributed over a billion dollars in aid money throughout Africa but...
Click to read more »that further denigrates the importance of our core content policies of Verfiability & No Original Research ? Is the understanding of & compliance with those...
Click to read more »arguments about how it's notable because of it's growth, and not offering any verfiable evidence on this religious movement's notability. Not sure if the lack...
Click to read more »policies as best as I can but am a little muddled on how to include more verfiable sources when in my opinion the article is loaded with sources. Lizzie656...
Click to read more »personally support the deletion of Influx Magazine as per GNG, but the verfiability and reliability of the sourced information is not dependent on the notability...
Click to read more »contribs) 19:56, 22 November 2012 (UTC) Gallura, Wikipedia operates on verfiability, not truth. What we need are reliable, independent, secondary sources...
Click to read more »personally support the deletion of Influx Magazine as per GNG, but the verfiability and reliability of the sourced information is not dependent on the notability...
Click to read more »you just say it's reliable without carrying the burden of proving the verfiability. Those things aside, I would like to know how you suddenly jumped into...
Click to read more »okay. By the way, I also noticed it here. My post was more about the verfiability issues and that it seems that there is an anti-Korean agenda behind these...
Click to read more »alternative595, that explains this. Yesterday you flagged the page for lack of verfiable sources, and posted same above here in response to me. Your flag was immedately...
Click to read more »summary statements about facts have to be sourced in/from independently verfiable data. Spotter 1 (talk) 03:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC) Oh, please. Now you're...
Click to read more »Tyrant As a Young Man by Brigitte Hamann - she says that there is no verfiable evidence that Hitler was an antisemite in Vienna and notes that Hitler...
Click to read more »true information" - "True information" is not what Wikipedia is about. Verfiable information is. The standard of inclusion on Wikipedia is verifiability...
Click to read more »the article is here. Notice how the article is poorly written with few verfiable sources, unformatted references and original research. I edited the article...
Click to read more »wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. In order for information to be verfiable, it must be published in a reliable source first and it is extremely difficult...
Click to read more »its type, so keep it if there is a way of expanding this article with verfiable data. --Aqua 04:10, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an...
Click to read more »would suggest the Colonel has no such information to support this view, verfiable or otherwise. Lets just stick to the subject in hand. --Gavin Collins...
Click to read more »people to go there from here. In fact, personally, I think we need more verfiability in general, not less, so it is very unlikely for me to go there and contribute...
Click to read more »can be found pronto - David Gerard 18:05, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC) No vote. Verfiability doesn't seem an issue, and street performers seem like potentially valid...
Click to read more »Spider-Man V released in 2015" would be a crystal ball event, but this is verfiable.23skidoo 17:00, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete: It is unverifiable. All the...
Click to read more »articles that meet Wikipedia stadards, such as WP:Notability and WP:Verfiability, before there is any need for a navigational box, Sadads (talk) 15:31...
Click to read more »the site are to outside articles and all information in the listing is verfiable. Might be the only Wiki entry that has my personal friggin email in it...
Click to read more »familiarize yoursel with the following Wikepedia policies on Consensus, verfiability and NPOV 1.Wikipedia works by building consensus. Consensus is an inherent...
Click to read more »list fails WP:LISTCRIT—the criteria is clearly articulated and easily verfiable through reliable sources. LISTCRIT only requires inline citations when...
Click to read more »22:12, 13 April 2011 (UTC) Delete - seems pretty clearly not to be a verfiable concept, Sadads (talk) 22:31, 13 April 2011 (UTC) Delete- pretty clearly...
Click to read more »to familiar with all of the source material, I do know that there is verfiable content. If given some time I would be able to dig up the necessary sources...
Click to read more »worldwide use and understanding, adding Phoon with an absolutely certain and verfiable origin (and not WP:BOLLOCKS as erroneously asserted above), and widespread...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. Yes, nice for the sources to be added, but simply as long as verfiability is possible, the presumtption is not rebutted. If an article states "Acor...
Click to read more »incomprehensible. What does it have to do with whether the subject of the article is verfiably notable? Khabs 17:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Keep asserts notability and...
Click to read more »licenses aren't compatible. Stifle (talk) 23:51, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Keep - Verfiable, precedent set by other route articles. -- Synapse 10:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »informational purposes only. Ariele 23:08, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) If it is NPOV and verfiable, then what does it matter what was going on the mind of the person who...
Click to read more »Dlohcierekim 03:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC) Delete. If they can't give us verfiable sources, forget it. Daniel Case 04:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC) Delete non...
Click to read more »knowledge available, which I think is a good sign that it is not notable or verfiable enough for WP. Delete, or stub-ify. --Fastfission 00:50, 12 July 2006...
Click to read more »submission has been rejected twice, but the article is well supported by verfiable sources. I could use more specific advice about how I can improve the...
Click to read more »noted by the accredited media, and it is prefered to source from these verfiable reports. You may mean that they provide unique opinions, which I do not...
Click to read more »truth. So we should not have this article right now until it becomes verfiable with reliable sources.- Wolfkeeper 14:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC) Merge any...
Click to read more »simple way for you to save your article - you need to provide sources from verfiable third-party media (such as a newspaper, magazine) that talks about your...
Click to read more »Delete - In addition the above arguments about conflict of interest, and verfiability/reliability of sources - we also need to consider that Wiki policy is...
Click to read more »is not myspace, it is an encyclopedia whose core principles include verfiability. Lack of verifiability should not missing word inserted later. be treated...
Click to read more »enough in themselves to have an article, subject to usual rules about verfiability, reliable sources etc. See WP:SHIPS. I though we only had the internet...
Click to read more »notable.Ramsquire 19:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Keep. This is list is verfiable. Because of the nature of O'Reily's show I think that this article does...
Click to read more »and WP:V. See User:CyberAnth/AfD/Original Research of Wanker and non Verfiability_of_claims for proof of violation of WP:WINAD, WP:OR, and WP:V. Non-improvability...
Click to read more »verifiability a speedy deletion criterion? In other words, how much do we value verfiability?, How important is it to Wikipedia? How important is it to you? Steve...
Click to read more »research, because it does not offer any kind of original thesis. It presents verfiable information relevant to a noteworthy film series in a straightforward...
Click to read more »it destroy the purpose of Wikipedia? The purpose of this is to write a verfiable encyclopedia. This reasearch and writing has nothing to do with who are...
Click to read more »--Doug Weller (talk) 15:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Keep per notability and verfiability and consistency with a specialized encyclopedia on Honorverse. Delete...
Click to read more »Onus as applying to new additions, removals, and modifications? WP:V § Verfiability does not guarantee inclusion would remain virtually unchanged. 04:29...
Click to read more »enough coverage anyway for us to write a reasonable length article, fully verfiable and NPOV, which is the purpose of notability imo, rather than just counting...
Click to read more »merge target for any of the content here, which appears to largely be verfiable. Aviation incidents are generally noted somewhere on Wikipedia whether...
Click to read more »"NOTABILITY" applies only to whether an assertion has significant coverage in verfiable sources, not to whether or not it is true. Wikipedia regards all editors...
Click to read more »unsuitable as not having no sources is not a deletion reason overall as only verfiability (of somekind) is required. Vandalism, POV, etc are suitable reasons for...
Click to read more »would ask then that you immediately strike your comment until there is a verfiable source. Such a comment would be removed from an article under our biographies...
Click to read more »shouldn't start this way apart from the obvious: Attribute points of view to verfiable sources when there is a dispute. What needs to be attributed when there...
Click to read more »you think a ebay listing which is a mirror of wikipedia content is a verfiable source, we've (well you) have got a problem. You have not provided any...
Click to read more »08:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Keep: I don't see how an argument for verfiability can be made when EGM (one of the largest video gaming magazines) has...
Click to read more »expertise will want to populate a past project history going as far back as verfiable human history allows. Thanks for your openness to new ideas. Will Juntunen...
Click to read more »well-organized, and contains both references and external links that demonstrate verfiability and the existence of reliable secondary sources about the topic. Improve...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Strong keep per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate, organized, verfiable, notable, and encyclopedic list). Consistent per First pillar with an...
Click to read more »featured article. The Cassell's reference is certainly enough to fulful verfiability requirements for the notion, irrespective of whether it actually occurrs...
Click to read more »that, where there is a total absence of any coverage at all, there is no verfiable evidence that a settlement is notable, nor is there any rationale for...
Click to read more »interpret your first sentence. Of course the templates state a (true, verfiable) fact, but a template that'd say "This is an article about a clown." would...
Click to read more »you mean sources rather than links, they are published accounts and are verfiable (that you personally can't or won't verify them is not an acceptable reason)...
Click to read more »factual claims based on precognition and clairvoyance affect the policy of verfiability? These are important questions!!! Martial Law has the foresight to ask...
Click to read more »cited and not a single source that is not verfiable? If you think that the sources are not reliable or not verfiable, the can you explain how? the "Bureaucracy...
Click to read more »Consistent with a specialized encyclopedia on Sonic the Hedgehog. Easily verfiable. Does not fail game guide as it is not a how to. Delete rationales tend...
Click to read more »shouldn't be making content decisions here, beyond notability and possible verfiability. Merge/Redirect, properly, is a recommendation to editors that they do...
Click to read more »been released on any other medium beyond Wikipedia, thus there is no verfiable proof that this is the official cover. Dancefloor royalty (talk) 14:09...
Click to read more »these sources, then source them....all of them. Otherwise, they aren't verfiable or reference and are a page of fan cruft made by a sockpuppet. - Neutralhomer...
Click to read more »history (most significantly more) so it is very likely that there are verfiable sources related to them that are hard to find (there is a simmlar logic...
Click to read more »my research. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 21:08, 19 August 2011 (UTC) Keep Verfiable works meets WP:GNG AND WP:CREATIVE. Some even up on Funny or Die [1]....
Click to read more »(speak to me) 05:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC). Keep. Notable location with verfiable information. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:03...
Click to read more »Merridew 13:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Keep. Passes our notability and verfiability requirements. Episode from a notable TV series with notable actors. References...
Click to read more »whatever they wanted into text in an article on an African subject? With no verfiability safeguard? And if the shield of "this is an African country subject,...
Click to read more »information can be verified. But again, what you're arguing for is that verfiability somehow equates to notability, and that just isn't the case. Can you...
Click to read more »and maintaining Wikipedia and so we most keep this useful, interesting, verfiable, and encyclopedic article. Happy Easter! --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho...
Click to read more »and we are here to uphold those policies. If you can bring independent, verfiable, secondary (or tertiary) sources into the article that assert the notability...
Click to read more »Junior High one. As there, WP gains nothing by deleting this factual, verfiable article about something of substance, and loses a little. I assume those...
Click to read more »it's not policy ("You may have noticed that the Wikipedia policy on Verfiability puts this the other way round – "verifiability, not truth" –..."). This...
Click to read more »like I said before, reformatting this article still wouldn't fix the verfiability and notability problems of the subject. This series hasn't been covered...
Click to read more »this article still violates all Wikipedia pillars, including Wikipedia:Verfiability (especially Self-published sources, since the main source of the article...
Click to read more »should redirect, there's no reason to delete as well, especially for a verfiable article that represents unoriginal research. Best, --Le Grand Roi des...
Click to read more »internal links? Eluchil404 10:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC) Strong Keep This is verfiable, and the article has been here since 2004, many editors have contributed...
Click to read more »fifth sources come from gaming magazine GamePro. The character is also verfiable through many others as confirmed by Google Books and Google News. As today...
Click to read more »source) is just routine coverage (especially in combination with the verfiable coverage of him being a 2x Olympian). --Enos733 (talk) 15:44, 29 October...
Click to read more »regardless of the behaviour issues the subject fails our notability and verfiability guidelines. Though the article contains lots of "references" they are...
Click to read more »content should be able to stand on its own merits regarding notability and verfiability. Peet Ern (talk) 07:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC) Support Per HiDrNick...
Click to read more »the Professorial Fellowships, I felt it uneccessary to cite obviously verfiable figures like the two nobel laureates, I've added one for Walter Raleigh's...
Click to read more »so this one should, referencing demonstrates Notability together woth Verfiability the sources are reliable the indiscriminate unsourced pieces were removed...
Click to read more »Government issued statistics, however there are certain issues with verfiability due to the paywall? --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:24, 16 December 2010...
Click to read more »paragraph in an article Sandstein 07:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Keep Verfiability is such B.S. We can't verify who killed JFK. That doesn't restrict us...
Click to read more »series in history and so thousands of readers will be interested in this verfiable material and will be willing to edit it. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho...
Click to read more »or add to a general list of Bionicle characters due to notability and verfiability as will encyclopedic interest, i.e. per Wikipedia:Five pillars such articles...
Click to read more »The fact that it has already been demonstrated that this person meets verfiability and notability requirements already shows that the article should not...
Click to read more »February 2007 (UTC) Delete POV fork and some original research. Anything verfiable can be added to the main Apollo Hoax page. Teiresias84 12:18, 8 February...
Click to read more »write a proper Wikipedia article, research must be done. There are 0 verfiable facts about this place, because it is a plan, not a place. Hence it fails...
Click to read more »could use a better lead, but this article is very well referenced (i.e. verfiable) and definely discriminate. And even in a worse case scenario with some...
Click to read more »these sources, then source them....all of them. Otherwise, they aren't verfiable or reference and are a page of fan cruft made by a sockpuppet. - Neutralhomer...
Click to read more »professor. Unlike, say, Internet memes, there are no pressing concerns of verfiability for American academics and I had no reason to interpret the consensus...
Click to read more »is not notable, and thus the article must be deleted. Do not confuse verfiability with notability; that is what the Keep voters seem to keep doing. Ong...
Click to read more »something Now by extension we can say verifiability means something is verfiable, or able to be verified, or, by definition, able to be proven. Hmm......
Click to read more »simple way for you to save your article - you need to provide sources from verfiable third-party media (such as a newspaper, magazine) that talks about your...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC) But it isn't original research and is verfiable. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 15:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »-GTBacchus(talk) 01:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC) Yes, notability is not the problem, verfiability is, the folks that want to keep it have yet to show how it meets WP:V...
Click to read more »be referred back to should a similar event occur in the future and a verfiable, neutral encyclopaedia article (which I think would be possible to write...
Click to read more »incomprehensible. What does it have to do with whether the subject of the article is verfiably notable? Khabs 17:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Keep asserts notability and...
Click to read more »is an article.Merkinsmum 12:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Comment It meets verfiable via the post-gazette link. The notability is the question. Is there something...
Click to read more »information was. I can publish this information in order to make it "verfiable". I think it's unjust and unfair to just delete them though. Adam 15:53...
Click to read more »18:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC) Keep as has real world significance and is verfiable. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 00:57, 17 March 2008...
Click to read more »to do something individually to make them notable and it needs to be Verfiable from a Reliable source. Am I the only one that thinks that a "notability...
Click to read more »(it is unreferenced, links to myspace, doesn't establish notability or verfiability of the subject, etc.), and perhaps consider the Slow Motion Crash as...
Click to read more »event(s) in which these moves appear. By definition it doesn't get any more verfiable than that for works of fiction. -- Y|yukichigai (ramble argue check) 22:33...
Click to read more »treated as such. -Amarkov blahedits 05:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Keep Verfiable and notable RaveenS 13:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Keep I'm not a proponent...
Click to read more »reason for deletion), the article's subject fails the notability and verfiability criteria. None of the businesses he supposedly founded seem to meet the...
Click to read more »further comment on why this would be wrong to delete. The school passes the verfiable test, and I really don't believe that we can't find anything notable for...
Click to read more »that? If so, let's do it. Hiding T 10:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Keep per verfiability and real world notability. It appears in a major novel and miniseries...
Click to read more »difficult. So, to me, it seems the question here calls for a balance between Verfiability and/or Notability vs Comprehensive and leading resource. And one more...
Click to read more »nor a publisher of "facts." Our mission is to publish knowledge that is verfiable by reliable sources, and this includes notable scientific theories. The...
Click to read more »write a proper Wikipedia article, research must be done. There are 0 verfiable facts about this place, because it is a plan, not a place. Hence it fails...
Click to read more »in a far better position to make a judgement. The references are not verfiable according to policy, myspace pages are 'self published' as are most web...
Click to read more »matter. The article clearly, obviously, meets the required standards of verfiability and factuality. Notability is not even a "official" reason for deletion...
Click to read more »nothing to address the issues for which it was deleted (notability and verfiability). I'm not a big fan of rerunning AfDs simply because we can. Besides...
Click to read more »notability? The multiple non-trivial independent media mentions, the verfiable information, the Reliable sources. What I think we have here is an advert...
Click to read more »Trivia - WP:FIVE Corpx 05:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Keep thorough and easily verfiable list that shows major influences on culture of a significant, award-winning/nominatd...
Click to read more »03:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC) It applies to everything on Wikipedia. Verfiability is the threshold, but thing (and people) must also be notable to be included...
Click to read more »games, a cartoon, two films, etc. Notable to humans in the real world and verfiable. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 17:16, 3 February...
Click to read more »to stand by as an obviously improveable article concerning something verfiable through dozens of reliable sources with unquestionable real world notability...
Click to read more »a non-notable neologism, while the article itself has no context nor verfiable sources. --Gavin Collins 08:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. The...
Click to read more »from my bank account, and write an article about it, it would be 100% verfiable (because of the recipt). It wouldn't, of course, be notable. Every birth...
Click to read more »community. --- The Bethling(Talk) 04:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Merge (same) Verfiability, original research, and reliability concerns are ungrounded due to readily...
Click to read more »and maintaining Wikipedia and so we most keep this useful, interesting, verfiable, and encyclopedic article. Happy Easter! --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho...
Click to read more »July 2007 (UTC) Delete hoax. Jon513 10:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Delete No verfiable sources; the ones listed are a misrepresentation and a smokescreen for...
Click to read more »to develop its own film production infrastructure. That notable and WP:Verfiable fact need not have been expanded into a 3000 word article in the New York...
Click to read more »considered the greatest ever to avoid POV issues. Don't ask me to do the verfiability bit. Pcb21| Pete 14:51, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) Yes, if we have a list of (what...
Click to read more »GameOgre? --Eyrian 16:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Notability is a guideline, but verfiability is policy, and there just does not seem to be any reliable sources to...
Click to read more »Delete per nom, DGG. Eusebeus (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Keep as verfiable and sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete as non verfiable. — Xy7 (talk) 19:07, 14 January 2008 19:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Huntington...
Click to read more »reason for cleanup, not deletion. Deletion only depends on notability/verfiability, not to be confused with as Klausness points out, with verified. GizzaDiscuss...
Click to read more »AfD) Second listing for this office tower. The article does not cite any verfiable claim to notability, but I can tell you that it was designed by same firm...
Click to read more »would ask then that you immediately strike your comment until there is a verfiable source. Such a comment would be removed from an article under our biographies...
Click to read more »the show's ongoing popularity readers will be interested in this easily verfiable list and editors will be willing to improve it. Best, --Le Grand Roi des...
Click to read more »recent appearance in a rockumentary about Shkodra - all of these are verfiable sources. Probably should check out refs to the band again not in this...
Click to read more »written word of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, what would you accept as a verfiable external source for WIKI entires on American military operations? Timharwoodx...
Click to read more »off readers and editors who contribute to and are interested in this verfiable article. Sincerley, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 20:09, 7 February...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Strong keep this discriminate, encyclopedic, notable, and verfiable information that is indeed covered in numerous game magazines and websites...
Click to read more »internet, perhaps, but lacking the multiple independent reliable and verfiable sources needed to satisfy Wikipedia standards. Edison 17:08, 16 February...
Click to read more »considering that the show exists on TV and on DVD much of its is very much so verfiable. Regards, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 23:23, 8 March 2008...
Click to read more »deletion, as this is a notable aspect of a major game series backed by verfiable sources. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 03:22, 17 March...
Click to read more »details on bra size. -- JJay 01:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC) Delete, non verfiable and also what sets the bar for "large breasted"?Gateman1997 00:03, 14...
Click to read more »example, [1]), sufficient sources come up to demonstrate notability, verfiability, and provide out of universe context. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le...
Click to read more »newspaper which I found here she still appears to fail our notability and verfiability criteria. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Keep - coverage...
Click to read more »shouldn't be making content decisions here, beyond notability and possible verfiability. Merge/Redirect, properly, is a recommendation to editors that they do...
Click to read more »doesn't assert notability and has no reliable 3rd party sourcing for verfiability. Also Wiki is not an advertisement for "Such as YouTube, Myspace, Google...
Click to read more »May 2008 (UTC) Strong keep all per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate and verfiable list associated with notable franchise; title even says "major" in it)...
Click to read more »individually notable, jut verifiable a masonic organiztions. to be notable, just verfiable. DGG (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Keep. I wasn't going to wade in...
Click to read more »article uses for sources), and WP:V says that the information must be verfiable and not verified. Needs work, not deletion. Pharmboy (talk) 21:16, 15...
Click to read more »is not myspace, it is an encyclopedia whose core principles include verfiability. Lack of verifiability should not missing word inserted later. be treated...
Click to read more »Wikipedia articles since other Wikis may not have the same rules on verfiability, neutrality.. Also we should improve articles rather than get rid of...
Click to read more »notability is not the main criterion for having an article but rather verfiability, neutrality, and no original research. This article passes all those...
Click to read more »added and the games existence and details about the game are clearly verfiable, and notable. 3.) The subject is notable. It may even be more notable...
Click to read more »have cataloged its use on their personal web sites. Besides the obvious verfiability issues, it seems like trivia, akin to having articles called List of...
Click to read more »subject matter is 1. Notable (read wp:n to see what that means) and 2. Verfiable (wp:v) using 3. Reliable sources.(wp:rs). Most of the other issues can...
Click to read more »Mgm|(talk) 11:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per others, I can't find any verfiable information on this product or the company involved. This further shows...
Click to read more »3rd party sources". I've found nothing since to support notability nor verfiability so have to add those to my original reasoning. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:27...
Click to read more »is an acceptable spinoff or sub article according to multiple editors, verfiable word that in a worst case scenario could be merged and redirected without...
Click to read more »— brighterorange (talk) 00:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Keep or Merge, as these are verfiable and factual information involving well-known video games, i.e definitely...
Click to read more »doesn't assert notability and has no reliable 3rd party sourcing for verfiability. Also Wiki is not an advertisement for "Such as YouTube, Myspace, Google...
Click to read more »article further. If nothing else, we have established notability and verfiability, i.e. enough to "save" the article. Now we just need to make it even...
Click to read more »Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source'. The article has verfiable sources and would need to be cut down to include those items only. WP:FRINGE...
Click to read more »will learn about it via deletion debate. However, unless there's been a verfiable third-party source writing about it, it's non-notable for web content...
Click to read more »present on both the Abyss and iRogue pages fail to satisfy the request for verfiable information about UltraRogue itself. I take responsibility for letting...
Click to read more »taken place there on the article since nomination, there is now enough verfiable information in the article for it to be valid. Davewild 21:11, 7 July...
Click to read more »archives. Somebody who can read Swedish could probably make the case for verfiable 3rd party coverage based on Google news. -- Whpq 16:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »encyclopedia gaining new users practically every minute. The article passes verfiability guidelines and has reliable primary sources, which are perfectly fine...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. (Wikipedia:Verifiability) What is verfiable is that Sherman has alleged that Bush said this. The Washington Monthly...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC) Keep per Wikipedia:Five pillars, i.e. verfiable information consistent with a specialized encyclopedia on words of which...
Click to read more »stuff) 22:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC) could you maybe produce some reliable, Verfiable source that asserts some claim to this stuff? And don't give us your crocodile...
Click to read more »these articles should be here. No substantial claim to notability, not verfiable, potential vanity page and no sources. Only source that got provided to...
Click to read more »or add to a general list of Bionicle characters due to notability and verfiability as will encyclopedic interest, i.e. per Wikipedia:Five pillars such articles...
Click to read more »have no issues thats 14 references more then enough for notability, verfiability. Where as deletion based on analysis about whether it works using science...
Click to read more »--Doug Weller (talk) 15:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Keep per notability and verfiability and consistency with a specialized encyclopedia on Honorverse. Delete...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete - Borderline G12 Speedy as well. Cannot find enough verfiable sources to suggest that this person meets WP:Music. A1octopus 20:59, 10...
Click to read more »this seems to still lead to problems. I do not think there are enough verfiable secondary sources to sustain this article either. In conclusion, my position...
Click to read more »Borden, etc.). Though largely unverified at present, this is obviously verfiable, and AFD is not for articles that can be cleaned up. I don't get how this...
Click to read more »promote your own creations. Your comic has to meet the notability and verfiability guidelines to get an article in Wikipedia. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 02:47...
Click to read more »MuZemike (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC) Delete fails notability and verfiability, although I have to admit I'm confused by the language in the nomination...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Strong keep per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate, organized, verfiable, notable, and encyclopedic list). Consistent per First pillar with an...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Keep article. All 400 year-old institutions are verfiable and notable. Delete nominator as disruptive single-purpose sock account...
Click to read more »about a topic from a notable franchise that meets are notability and verfiability guidelines and plicies. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho...
Click to read more »WP:COI. Soxred 93 16:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Delete Fails notability and verfiability Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC) Do Not Delete, The Internet...
Click to read more »the English Wikipedia. I will consider changing my vote, if there are verfiable English references or third-party citations. Otherwise it should be crossed...
Click to read more »Mooveeguy (talk) 21:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Keep per notability and verfiability. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 00:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »criteria listed at Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers. There is no verfiable independent coverage on this actor. The Wikipedia article has a history...
Click to read more »this article still violates all Wikipedia pillars, including Wikipedia:Verfiability (especially Self-published sources, since the main source of the article...
Click to read more »appear to be sourced from wikipedia. If the claims of this article were verfiable and if there were good references the article would clearly be notable...
Click to read more »wikipedian just made up. And even in the context used here, they are verfiable. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 20:17...
Click to read more »wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. In order for information to be verfiable, it must be published in a reliable source first and it is extremely difficult...
Click to read more »to mention that, in the case of the article's subject-matter not being verfiable, it seems that only the claim of supporting a "theoretical maximum sampling...
Click to read more »you think a ebay listing which is a mirror of wikipedia content is a verfiable source, we've (well you) have got a problem. You have not provided any...
Click to read more »234.41 (talk) 12:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Keep all of this discriminate, verfiable, and notable material that appears both on multiple notable shows and...
Click to read more »