Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Vanispamcruftisement (/ˌvænɪˌspæmkrəfˈtaɪzmənt/; sometimes abbreviated as vanispamcruft or VSCA) is a portmanteau neologism comprising several editorial faults which some...
Click to read more »March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as a complete idiotic waste of WP:VSCA space Computerjoe 11:56, 4 March...
Click to read more »tempted to speedy it as CSD A7. WP:VSCA comes to mind here. --kingboyk 08:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as VSCA. --Terence Ong 08:20, 13 March 2006...
Click to read more »16:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Looks like a VSCA, feels like a VSCA, smells like a VSCA. Kimchi.sg 18:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC) Comment: I just...
Click to read more »Delete. WP:VSCA candidate. -- MarcoTolo 16:49, 3 May 2006 (UTC) MarcoTolo - please be specific as to why this article is WP:VSCA. Of the 4 VSCA options,...
Click to read more »as WP:VSCA created by Mibizreji ... his talk page has the same information! --151.200.246.168 09:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Delete both per VSCA, neither...
Click to read more »Google links, and added bonus-article is in all CAPS J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 16:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC) Delete as unverifiable, probable hoax. ~MDD4696...
Click to read more »19:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC) WP:VSCA Non-notable cruft Garglebutt / (talk) 01:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 01:28, 28 February...
Click to read more »possible WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 04:43, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. --Kinu 04:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. --Wingsandsword...
Click to read more »February 2006 (UTC) Delete, reeks of WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 03:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA and indiscriminate collection of information...
Click to read more »March 2006 (UTC) Delete. Hoax or WP:VSCA at best. -- Krash (Talk) 02:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete. NN and VSCA. Eivind 06:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »information on the subject. Peter Grey 05:45, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 05:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Delete. Advertising. Metamagician3000...
Click to read more »potential WP:VSCA. --Kinu 18:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 20:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as nn and possible WP:VSCA. Dustimagic...
Click to read more »diligent user. Delete as WP:VSCA. Kinu 07:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete Spam --PatCheng 07:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA --Wingsandsword 08:27...
Click to read more »Not notable. Sleepyhead 14:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Looks like WP:VSCA. --Kinu 17:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete It's not even finished yet, according...
Click to read more »above --HappyCamper 23:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC) delete as VSCA J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 00:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC) Delete. NeoJustin 00:38, December...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - smells of WP:VSCA and poorly written too --Xorkl000 03:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete: A7. Also WP:VSCA. --Kinu 03:52, 5 February...
Click to read more »admission of WP:VSCA or a lack of notability according to WP:MUSIC. Elkman - (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as likely WP:VSCA and failure of WP:MUSIC...
Click to read more »WP:CORP or WP:VSCA. Although there are hundreds of pages describing small internet-based companies on Wikipedia that appear to be WP:VSCA kswensrud Comment...
Click to read more »ads. ChemGardener 17:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Delete both per nom as WP:VSCA. --Kinu 19:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Looks like ChemGardener removed the...
Click to read more »10:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:VSCA. PJM 12:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable, VSCA. — Saxifrage ✎ 14:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Renesis13 22:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as VSCA. savidan(talk) (e@) 22:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, VSCA, as per others. --Deville (Talk) 01:52, 29...
Click to read more »AFD discussion is needed to make a consesus decision J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 23:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC) Yes, G4 doesn't apply because the current version...
Click to read more »Sounds more like WP:VSCA than an actual accepted anti-phishing technique. --Kinu 19:13, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 01:34, 6 February...
Click to read more »--Khoikhoi 02:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as VSCA. --Terence Ong 02:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA Bucketsofg 02:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC) DeleteJames...
Click to read more »smells of WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 04:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete fails WP:CORP. OhNoitsJamieTalk 06:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA and WP:CORP...
Click to read more »May 2007 (UTC). Delete per WP:VSCA. hmwithtalk 16:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete Per nom and ors. Definatly WP:VSCA. Thewinchester (talk) 05:11, 29...
Click to read more »- words fail me.) Emeraude 14:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. WP:VSCA. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 16:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Strong delete not-notable;...
Click to read more »delete J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 21:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC) or a vehicle for advertising J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 22:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as nearly prototypical WP:VSCA. --Dhartung | Talk 22:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Note that WP:VSCA is an essay, not official Wikipedia policy...
Click to read more »not pass WP:WEB J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 19:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Website does not exist J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 19:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »not sell anything. mgrodzki 2:11, 3 March 2006 (EST) Delete as likely WP:VSCA. Doesn't seem very notable; a true "phenomenon" would do better on the Google...
Click to read more »read like a textbook case of VSCA, and is not notable. Delete. -Fsotrain09 19:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC) Delete, non-notable VSCA. --Coredesat talk 21:59, 28...
Click to read more »Christmas Special?... almost qualifies as CSD {{nonsense}}. J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 22:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Comment: Cleaned it up, whether or not the...
Click to read more »only as WP:VSCA. --Pleather 07:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 08:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC) Delete - WP:VSCA. MER-C 09:00...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete fails WP:CORP, WP:VSCA. ViridaeTalk 04:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC) OK After reading WP:CORP and WP:VSCA I feel sufficently put in my place...
Click to read more »• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Delete WP:VSCA. Also, the nomination was deleted, so I restored it. I tagged a single purpose...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) delete or redirect to userpage you pick J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 16:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC) Uhh, allowing redirects from encyclopedia...
Click to read more »ads. --Daniel Olsen 02:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per above and WP:VSCA. --Storkk 02:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as per nomination, would be...
Click to read more »Talk VSCA 16:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC) comment author has removed AFD tag twice, and changed statements in AFD discussion J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 17:21...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:VSCA. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 13:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Delete- More useless junk. Random info, per WP:VSCA. Retiono Virginian 15:22...
Click to read more »statement of why it is notable. Erechtheus 15:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA. Thε Halo Θ 15:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC) The author of the book is Charif Benhelima...
Click to read more »candidate. (aeropagitica) 06:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VAIN and WP:VSCA. 10 is downright lame, especially when half of them are Wikipedia. Royboycrashfan...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hoax, not verifiable, or possible original research J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 04:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Nonsense. Speedy. GeorgeStepanek\talk 04:56...
Click to read more »Talk VSCA 20:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC) agree that user is a nuiscance, but as far as the article goes it is an essay, delete J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:57...
Click to read more »Google hits. Or, to use the new term: WP:VSCA Wingsandsword 03:48, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA and WP:VAIN. --Kinu 03:56, 8 February 2006...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete for failure to meet WP:CORP. Article also smells of WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »edit of the article. Delete, probable copyvio and seems to fall under WP:VSCA. Stifle 16:43, 31 January 2006 (UTC) This AfD is being relisted to generate...
Click to read more »19:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete WP:VSCA (G11) Danny Lilithborne 22:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Vsca are not speedy criteria; G11 does not cover...
Click to read more »Vanispamcruftisement. Contested prod. MER-C 09:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --151.200.246.168 09:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »Greiner 01:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Strong odour of pork. Delete per WP:VSCA. No sign it passes WP:CORP. Ohconfucius 03:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »November 2007 (UTC) Delete as per nom WP:VSCA -- Dougie WII 15:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA and WP:BIO. Borderline speedy. Stifle (talk)...
Click to read more »change or comment. -- Ben 21:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC) keep If that's WP:VSCA I'd like to see more cruft articles that well written. -Hansonc 21:35, 1...
Click to read more »not meet criteria of WP:CORP Yy-bo 20:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC) Delete - VSCA, unsourced Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 20:57...
Click to read more »Drdisque 17:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC) delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 18:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC) Delete as gamecruft. Stifle 23:17, 16 January...
Click to read more »Sangrail (talk) 01:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - Pure weapons-grade WP:VSCA … "references' appear to be about trivial associations, and not in-depth...
Click to read more »04:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Delete: Per nom. (G-Hits seem unrelated, and VSCA). - Rjd0060 05:40, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Delete:I think everything said...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. NTK 19:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »-Splashtalk 00:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC) Weak Google presence. Likely WP:VSCA as created by an editor with the same name as the author of the game. Delete...
Click to read more »in question. Jaywalker911 10:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. WP:VSCA was defined for entries like this! --Kinu 22:51, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Advertisement TheRingess 09:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable, WP:VSCA. --Kinu 17:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Ardenn 00:15, 6 February...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:COI, possible WP:VSCA if the article was created on behalf of the Scruggs Katrina Group. Notability...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Speedy delete as WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD;G11 and WP:VSCA. Guy (Help!) 00:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC) DJ Emir (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »verifiable statements and externally links to blog J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 02:31, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Delete as non-notable website, vanity, unverifiable...
Click to read more »Questionable notability. — ERcheck (talk) 22:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA Leuko 04:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Nuttah68 17:25, 26 August...
Click to read more »owner of the label). Wickethewok 19:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 00:14, 23 April 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) VSCA. Appears to be a non-notable person. Many of the, at first glance, more reliable...
Click to read more »WP:MUSIC, WP:VANITY, and WP:VSCA. Homepage on MySpace makes this an obvious delete. Royboycrashfan 00:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC) WP:VSCA is not a policy, and should...
Click to read more »(UTC) New 2D engine. NonNotable. WP is not a crystal ball J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 18:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC) Delete, not notable, vanity Jawz 09:06, 16...
Click to read more »28 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 00:13, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Delete ditto WP:VSCA. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 00:17, 28 February...
Click to read more »(UTC) NN DJ that claims notability, but none verified J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 16:46, 7 January 2006 (UTC) Deelete! per nom. Sceptre (Talk) 16:57, 7...
Click to read more »notability is debatable. As mentioned in nom, there is strong sense of WP:VSCA both in terms of creator of the article and its tone. LeaveSleaves talk 19:10...
Click to read more »(UTC) delete nn vanity Bucketsofg 19:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, WP:VSCA, WP:BIO-failing, useless article. --Kinu t/c 19:38, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »marsh 19:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC) This article apprears to be complete WP:VSCA. the related articles John macbain, John McBain, Didier Breton, Trader.com...
Click to read more »04:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:WEB, reads like poorly written WP:VSCA. WP:NOT a place to talk about how your web forum is the best, especially...
Click to read more »setup that it should be set at before it is removed. - c4smok Delete. Yay WP:VSCA! --Kinu 03:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete I was flagging this for AfD myself...
Click to read more »400 Google hits. --Last Avenue 19:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. An AOL e-mail address? Come on. --Kinu 20:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »00:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC) Delete; non-notable, fails WP:WEB, likely WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 07:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. Insh'allah! RGTraynor 19:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 22:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC) Delete Moe ε 18:05, 12 April 2006...
Click to read more »– (View log) Apparently self-created article violating WP:N, WP:COI, WP:VSCA and WP:MADEUP. Every "source" refers back to author's website. -- Dougie...
Click to read more »Unreferenced, sounds like an ad, questionable notability. Looks like WP:VSCA Dougie WII (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete tagged it as...
Click to read more »--Bugwit grunt / scribbles 00:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as per WP:VSCA. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, ad. Pavel Vozenilek 12:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. Stifle 23:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »logged in to post here about his band and then never came back, thus WP:VSCA. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 23:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Strong delete. No assertion...
Click to read more »article fails WP:SPAM, WP:CORP, WP:VAIN, WP:NOT, WP:OR, WP:REF, WP:WING, WP:VSCA and so forth. WilyD 15:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Delete -- all info copied verbatim...
Click to read more »by founder of company MNewnham 21:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. --Kinu 07:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per Kinu. Stifle 01:45, 5 February...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. Jammo (SM247) 00:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA or else get rid of the adspam. - Richardcavell 02:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nomination. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 17:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOR and WP:VSCA. Stifle 14:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »WP:SPAM. Delete--Richhoncho 11:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC) Delete: nn WP:VSCA. Leuko 12:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per above. MER-C 12:19, 23 September...
Click to read more »January 2006 (UTC) re-tag as {{db-band}} per CSD A7 J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 15:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Delete and maybe move to WP:BJAODN; it's a...
Click to read more »16 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as non-notable clubcruft; at best this is WP:VSCA. Apparently this article was created on 2004-07-28... I'm glad someone finally...
Click to read more »MastCell 21:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC) Delete. This seems to me to border on WP:VSCA. He may be notable in the future, but does not currently seem so. Vassyana...
Click to read more »UltraMagnus (talk) 16:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC) Delete - strong reek of WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 01:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »stars"+gaming yields very few relevant results beyond the first page. Satisfies WP:VSCA per nom. --Kinu 19:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nomination. For self-evident...
Click to read more »to notability. Frank | talk 20:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. Notability not established. Eddie.willers (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2009...
Click to read more »university that it is part of. Dr Zak 17:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA: nothing but trivia, listcruft and conclusory statements. JChap 19:09, 6...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete - Simply a couple of lines of half-arsed non-specific VSCA. Hardly worth the trouble. OBM | blah blah blah 12:41, 25 September 2006...
Click to read more »--BakugekiNZ 04:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC) delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 04:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Delete as nonsense research.Blnguyen 05:20...
Click to read more »user has left wikipedia 18:03 2006-02-05 Delete. Fails WP:BAND, but not WP:VSCA. Probably even WP:Copyvio, but I don't care enough to check. --Kinu 18:40...
Click to read more »notable nor appropriate, adcruft. NTK 19:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 21:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »non-notable software, possible advert RJFJR 20:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA. Eivindspeak! 00:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable software, and...
Click to read more »need another hobby... ---Cathal 15:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. WP:VSCA. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:25...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - advertising. Latinus 22:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA. Stifle 00:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »nothing noteworthy.Voice of AllT|@|ESP 06:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC) Possible WP:VSCA, definitely written as an advertisement. I recommend delete. — FREAK OF NURxTURE...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Speedy delete as WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD;G11 and WP:VSCA. Guy (Help!) 00:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC) DJ Emir (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »demonstrated to WP:BIO or WP:CORP. Additionally, there's a strong smell of WP:VSCA about the article. Eddie.willers (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »-- Capitalistroadster 02:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)" Delete. Smells of WP:VSCA (at least as of this writing. It says it's currently undergoing major changes)...
Click to read more »31 December 2005 (UTC) delete trash on a platter? J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 23:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC) Delete Roisterer 09:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as vanity. --Terence Ong 15:51, 15 March 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA refers, non-notable poet and poetry. (aeropagitica) 16:05, 15 March 2006...
Click to read more »WP:ATHLETE is met Fraudy talk 03:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:VSCA and so tagged. WP is not myspace. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »notable company JulesH 23:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable, WP:VSCA. Should've been {{prod}}ed because it's just that awful. --Kinu 23:31, 4...
Click to read more »| Have your say!!! 05:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per all above and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 05:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete nn. --Siva1979Talk to me...
Click to read more »assertion of notability Chris 07:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - per WP:VSCA. It's most of those - an advertisement, non-notable (a club at a university...
Click to read more »Delete as per above. --Several Times 17:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 00:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Delete ditto. – Someguy0830 (Talk...
Click to read more »firms" tells us nothing. MER-C 09:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Dennette 10:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »for lack of independent third-party verification and strong potential WP:VSCA violation. Eddie.willers (talk) 17:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Relisted to...
Click to read more »(UTC) delete blantant advertisement for NN company J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 04:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC) This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing...
Click to read more »August 2006 (UTC) Delete, no evidence of meeting WP:SOFTWARE, possible WP:VSCA per edit history of article/author. --Kinu t/c 21:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »per nom and fails WP:V -- Whpq 15:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as NN WP:VSCA that fails WP:V --Dennette 11:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »article —— Eagle (ask me for help) 22:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 09:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per all. --Fang Aili...
Click to read more »enough to merit inclusion. Húsönd 19:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. All sources are self-promotion like purevolume. --Dhartung | Talk 23:05...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom --Khoikhoi 08:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 00:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »--Austrian 23:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC) delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 01:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Delete NN self-promo: "I have written this...
Click to read more »or directory listing. Marysunshine 23:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC) Delete - WP:VSCA - Richardcavell 23:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC) Delete per above. Yanksox 23:37...
Click to read more »WP:NFT. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 14:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per VSCA. Ironholds 13:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC) This AfD nomination was incomplete...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Blantant Advertising for Non Notable Company J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 18:36, 15 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom -- SusanLarson (User Talk, New...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete spam. --Ashenai 15:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 19:09, 21 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »- with 254 hits? Flowerparty■ 22:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. --Kinu 07:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »vanispamish. --Evb-wiki (talk) 03:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 11:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Changing to Strong delete due...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per Daniel. Makemi 04:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, WP:VSCA. Bad ideas 08:03, 16 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »vanispamcruftisment --BigglesTheGreat 13:59, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 19:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Delete It's curious that there...
Click to read more »08:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Non notable Band, Vanity J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 23:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC) Delete per nom. --NaconKantari 23:58, 30...
Click to read more »and advertisement. Bad ideas 01:51, 14 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 00:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:NG, vancarlimospacecraft...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - Advertisement Splat 20:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Kinu 20:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom --kingboyk 21:22, 6 February...
Click to read more »[T]/[C] AfD? 18:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC) delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 18:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC) Keep, 84,300 google hits [1], long list of...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Does not assert the notability of the subject, seems to be WP:VSCA Leuko 01:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC) Delete These are characters from a video...
Click to read more »Delete as per nom. -- Alias Flood 01:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA and WP:BALLS. Stifle (talk) 18:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. However, this was the person's first article, thus suggesting WP:VSCA. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Delete I agree with both...
Click to read more »15:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC) delete WP is not a game guide J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 16:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC) delete Not notable. It looks like an advertisment...
Click to read more »I've ever seen --Deville (Talk) 03:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Delete. Neologism and blatant advertising...
Click to read more »(aeropagitica) 04:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:CORP, like WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 15:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »--Latinus (talk (el:)) 17:26, 3 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Blatant WP:VSCA. --Kinu 08:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »04:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Delete, doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO, possible WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 04:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom --Ageo020 05:05, 24...
Click to read more »promotion. fbb_fan 02:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete. More WP:VSCA by the author of The daily reel. --Dennette 08:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Orphaned AFD, listing now. My vote delete as NN-BIO J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 22:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Delete. Currently a redirect to a userpage...
Click to read more »ads. ChemGardener 17:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Delete both per nom as WP:VSCA. --Kinu 19:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Do not delete biographical info on...
Click to read more »released and google test provides no relevant links J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 15:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. PJM 15:20, 4 January 2006...
Click to read more »WP:BIO J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 04:52, 2 January 2006 (UTC) per disscussion below week keep J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 15:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »being an obscure an non-notable journo, wrt WP:BIO. Also smells a bit of WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »google hits Amcfreely 22:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRUFT and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 22:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC) Delete as per above. -- Grafikm_fr...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete: WP:VSCA. This was prodded and deprodded before wrongly being prodded again. I removed...
Click to read more »Google search gives 94,600 hits but current article is little better than WP:VSCA. -- Mithent 00:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Keep "115-year-old magazine" --Ruby...
Click to read more »as non-notable group really qualifies, but everything else is just a WP:VSCA. Stifle 23:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »consulting firm" is pretty much guaranteed to be a WP:CORP failure and WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 19:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete: vanity/advert. MCB 03:11, 4...
Click to read more »Werdna648T/C\@ 09:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per the excellent WP:NFT and WP:VSCA. Stifle 21:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »September 2006 (UTC) Delete Blatant WP:VSCA. -- Fan-1967 14:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Delete being unashamed WP:VSCA. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 17:35...
Click to read more »your say!!! 01:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOR, WP:COPY, WP:VSCA, and WP:BALLS. Stifle 00:05, 27 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »--B.U. Football For Life|Talk 18:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 16:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »together in 1993...", now they can leave together per above with a dash of WP:VSCA for taste. --Wine Guy Talk 21:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »properly sourced either. PJM 14:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA, along with Pyros by the same author. --72.75.117.73 21:20, 19 September...
Click to read more »as a pseudonym ... not even close to satisfying WP:BIO ... it's just WP:VSCA to draw traffic to their blog. —68.239.79.97 12:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »January 2006 (UTC) delete WP:CORP or WP:NEO both apply J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 01:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC) Keep - Legit slang and should be kept. Relevant...
Click to read more »Unverifiable, Incognito 05:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:V, WP:VSCA, and WP:BALLS at a stretch. Stifle 02:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »delete all These article are all based on MySpace, not reliable sources. WP:VSCA Beeblebrox (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »it is full of spam.Abtract 20:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete - WP:VSCA Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 23:30, 2 October...
Click to read more »6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:MUSIC. Looks more like WP:VSCA. --Kinu 00:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »stuff) 00:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Strong delete Per nom. Article is clearly WP:VSCA from a single purpose WP:COI editor. Thewinchester (talk) 00:35, 4 June 2007...
Click to read more »notability, no verifiability, no external sources except for a MySpace page, WP:VSCA, WP:SPA. Also, I need to figure out how to write a linux script that'll automate...
Click to read more »9 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB, WP:CRUFT, WP:NOT, WP:VAIN, and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 01:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per most of Royboy's list...
Click to read more »1996". —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-05 22:07Z Delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 22:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Looks like they're trying...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete- per nom--Bill 23:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. --Kinu 23:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC) delete. sigh. aa v ^ 23:21, 6 February...
Click to read more »Alexa rank is 334,439. --Kinu 20:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 13:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Delete article seems created just to...
Click to read more »GangstaEB~(penguin logs) 16:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:NN? WP:VAIN? WP:VSCA? Or simply WP:NFT? Definatly delete. Thε Halo Θ 19:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, podvertising. NawlinWiki 14:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA? Thε Halo Θ 14:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC) Delete As per all above. will381796...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. When I started reading the article, I thought it qualified as VSCA; by the time I reached the end, I was sure of it. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 16:08...
Click to read more »Billington (talk • contribs) 01:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA created by owner. --Dennette 02:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Comment: The creating...
Click to read more »15 January 2006 (UTC) delete WP is not a crystal ball J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 18:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC) Delete agree with Jwestbrook -- SusanLarson...
Click to read more »Delete JeremyA 01:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB, WP:VAIN, WP:VSCA, WP:NFT, and WP:SPAM. Royboycrashfan 01:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »Stifle 23:20, 12 January 2006 (UTC) delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 23:24, 12 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Segv11 (talk/contribs) 02:25...
Click to read more »Firefox Extensions. It doesnt need its own article J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 22:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Delete. Not notable. JoaoRicardotalk 05:24...
Click to read more »Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 07:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA. Stifle 16:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »Delete his name too. MiracleMat 09:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Dennette 11:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as a non noatble vainity...
Click to read more »--NaconKantari 21:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC) delete umm no J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 21:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC) Delete, neologism, per nom. -Rebelguys2 22:30...
Click to read more »Flores (Talk) 01:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:NOT, and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 01:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as advert. OhNoitsJamieTalk...
Click to read more »lifted from another source. Artw 01:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per Stifle - CrazyRussian...
Click to read more »also looks like vanity. --Kinu 22:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA, or at least part thereof. Stifle 21:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Delete, spamvertising. NawlinWiki 20:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA. Danny Lilithborne 23:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Celcius 02:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Speedy G4 per the above and A7 per WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 02:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »non-notable forum. JIP | Talk 09:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, smells of WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 09:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete advertising for the website...
Click to read more »11 October 2006 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:BIO and also appears to violate VSCA (creator is Chrisjepson). Daniel Olsen 02:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »No evidence of innovation, reach, significance - fails WP:WEB. Likely WP:VSCA, started by User:Websearcherman, who has no contribs other than this article...
Click to read more »hits by default). Fourohfour 15:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. NN, WP:VSCA. --Kinu 18:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »as nn spammer. Blnguyen 04:03, 13 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per JzG, WP:VSCA. Stifle 23:19, 13 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 16:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Delete. VSCA posterchild. -- MarcoTolo 16:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Angus McLellan...
Click to read more »--Latinus (talk (el:)) 16:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as blatant WP:VSCA. --Kinu 08:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »Advertisement, vanity. nn. Delete Ardenn 06:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. WP:VSCA. Content here is not worth merging back into the ABS-CBN article. --Kinu...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:VSCA article on non-notable band, fails WP:N. No sources, fails WP:V. It's very...
Click to read more »15 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as non-notable, WP:MUSIC-failing, and WP:VSCA-ousness. Same goes for the vanity "mad f0t0sh0p p1cz0r" of themselves. --Kinu...
Click to read more »non-notable "warez" site. Weregerbil 18:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA from "a guy who is currently 16." --Kinu 18:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »00:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Strong delete, non-notable podcast, reeks of WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 00:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Strong delete Part of the Warcraft...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom Hello32020 19:31, 20 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --141.156.232.179 22:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »as WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:RS, and (because of the single-purpose account) WP:VSCA. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 18:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. JohnCD...
Click to read more »Ong 16:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:V, WP:BIO, and probably WP:VSCA based on the prominently displayed blog link. --Kinu t/c 21:53, 13 March...
Click to read more »Michael Enslow Project - Mgm|(talk) 08:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Dennette 09:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete - per my nom. Victoriagirl...
Click to read more »that pass WP:CORP get more than 8 relevant Google results. Seems like WP:VSCA for their website and blog. --Kinu t/c 07:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »encyclopedia here. Pavel Vozenilek 23:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 16:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Delete: nn advertising. --Hetar 07:57...
Click to read more »advertising. User:Zoe|(talk) 17:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:BALLS and WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 00:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, adcruft. ekedolphin 21:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Wikipedia is not a free webhost. Probably a copyvio. Stifle (talk) 00:49...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. --Ardenn 06:20, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, smells of WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 10:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete nn Prodego talk 15:10...
Click to read more »proposes that the game will be a game, but not yet J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 02:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs)...
Click to read more »per nom. Non-notable software company with non-notable software; likely WP:VSCA. --Kinu 20:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Magdela 21:51, 15 February...
Click to read more »vanity. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-05 22:11Z Delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 22:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Delete "The company will launch in 2006"....
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete - spam. BTLizard 11:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA indeed. Pascal.Tesson 18:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »chirps) 04:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Delete, self-sourced autobiography, WP:VSCA tendencies. No attribution of notability to independent sources. --Dhartung...
Click to read more »zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA fits perfectly. Stifle 16:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »--Nishkid64 23:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete per nom. This is WP:VSCA. Danny Lilithborne 23:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Comment There also exists...
Click to read more »Biruitorul Talk 17:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Blatant autobiography, WP:VSCA. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete as biography...
Click to read more »29 December 2005 (UTC) delete Photo Blogger, NN J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete as nn-bio; tagged as such...
Click to read more »September 2006 (UTC) Non-Notable software company. Fails WP:CORP and WP:VSCA that fails WP:V. Article was deprodded by author. Michael Greiner 03:59,...
Click to read more »user, after adding content. Fuzzie 03:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 03:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per Rob joshbuddytalk 04:16...
Click to read more »WP:SOFTWARE, in other words, and lack of sources suggests WP:OR if not outright WP:VSCA. Just zis Guy you know? 12:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Delete as non-notable....
Click to read more »article meets definition of vanispamcruftisement J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 21:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »- vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 12:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Delete, yes WP:VSCA applies well here. Budgiekiller 13:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Keep, the person...
Click to read more »--Khoikhoi 17:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB, WP:CRUFT, and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 02:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »article is advertising posted by the company's founder, and generally WP:VSCA-ish. Ryanjunk 17:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Surely the important thing is...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete just a shell now, but potential to become full blown WP:VSCA. Love that the link to Red Herring goes to a page which contains "a type...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Ardenn 07:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 10:11, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete VanityAdCruftTastic ++Deiz...
Click to read more »??? ??? 05:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:CORP, WP:SPAM, and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 06:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, nn company, spam. --Terence...
Click to read more »services on Wikipedia. dcandeto 03:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA.Eivind 04:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, advert, good Prod candidate --...
Click to read more »Mandsford 13:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO, WP:COI, and WP:VSCA. STORMTRACKER 94 13:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO TonyBallioni...
Click to read more »13 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't seem too notable, and reeks of WP:VSCA. --Kinu 05:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Why do the kind of people who...
Click to read more »for reasons given. - Triviaa 20:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)— Delete as WP:VSCA --72.75.117.73 22:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »--lightdarkness (talk) 20:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 00:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC) Delete nn.Blnguyen 02:55, 16 February...
Click to read more »techno-gibberish. dbtfztalk 01:30, 16 April 2006 (UTC) delete textbook WP:VSCA material. Pete.Hurd 04:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC) Note, anon IP blanked this...
Click to read more »Evidence Two WP:SPA accounts, both with similar names to the person in the WP:VSCA article they have been editing, Steve Golieb . The second one popped up right...
Click to read more »"Werkplace" PS2pcGAMER (talk) 05:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 05:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC) Delete content and redirect...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete nn. mikka (t) 18:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. This information belongs on the group's own website, not Wikipedia. Stifle...
Click to read more »a publisher of original thought or original research J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC) Delete OR Just zis Guy you know? 21:30, 17 May...
Click to read more »notable, so delete. FairHair 17:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as NN WP:VSCA --Dennette 04:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete - per Dlyons493. Zaxem 05:06...
Click to read more »myspace page MNewnham 21:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, somewhere around WP:VSCA. Stifle 01:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Mangojuice 17:48, 8...
Click to read more »Delete. Per above. UncleFloyd 03:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. This information belongs on the group's own website. Stifle 22:15, 20 February...
Click to read more »--Tetsuya-san (talk : contribs) 15:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA that violates WP:V as well. --Dennette 10:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC. The MySpace link leads me to believe it's WP:VSCA as well. --Kinu t/c 06:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as nn-band, vanispamcrutisment...
Click to read more »prod, he disappeared and didn't bother. Thus, the article remains as WP:VSCA and still fails WP:V. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »stated in article talk page, as well as failing WP:SOFTWARE and being WP:VSCA. CraigF 00:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Delete until it's a mature beta at...
Click to read more »mistagged as PD-self. - Mgm|(talk) 10:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Delete: per WP:VSCA. Nothing but an ad, no assertion of notability, no reason to stay. --Daniel...
Click to read more »FreplySpang (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:WEB, WP:VSCA, and WP:NOT. Royboycrashfan 05:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Comment or redirect...
Click to read more »December 2005 (UTC) delete per everything listed above J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 21:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC) Delete per nom. ParkerHiggins ( talk contribs...
Click to read more »credibility. The problem of this page is that the age of the company begs WP:VSCA contestation. I truly believe they are a valid subject for a counterculture...
Click to read more »pure adspam. - Richardcavell 02:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Dennette 02:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete advertisement. Zephyr2k 02:45...
Click to read more »Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. Sandstein 16:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as vanispamcruftisment. --Terence...
Click to read more »chudasama"; most are weblogs or self-referential. Fails WP:BIO. Reads like WP:VSCA. --Kinu 18:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete — Per Kinu. — Bill W...
Click to read more »Capital)? Ruby 05:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as non-notable and WP:VSCA. --Kinu 05:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fagstein 06:23, 9 February...
Click to read more »Detroit area, and have one self-released album. Also, the article reads like VSCA. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 15:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - it looks like...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Under 300 Googles, with Wikipedia top of the list. I spy WP:VSCA. Just zis Guy you know? 00:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC) Delete NN. Looks like...
Click to read more »guidelines the podcasting project is using. Leaves just a tiny bit of a VSCA after-taste (or is that my OJ? ;). Seed 2.0 20:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »PORNOSTAR of the history.--K4zem 22:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA - User:Victoria Lanz is just trying to promote herself. --72.75.117.73 22:38...
Click to read more »December 2005 (UTC) delete as vanispamcruftisement J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 21:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC) Delete: WP:VSCA. No reliable sources given for verification. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:59, 23...
Click to read more »not. I can't even find any sources that say they're a leader. Delete as WP:VSCA. Fan-1967 20:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- MarcoTolo 22:34...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC) delete - WilliamH, you can just refer to WP:VSCA if you feel "vanispamcruftisement" is too big. :-) AllGloryToTheHypnotoad...
Click to read more »reliable coverage. Pascal.Tesson 04:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - NN, WP:VSCA. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 14:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable. NawlinWiki...
Click to read more »band vanity, MMORPG guilds, and CS clans, not for WP J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 23:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC) Delete, non-notable. Evil Eye 00:32, 2 January...
Click to read more »- Starblind 01:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VAIN, WP:NOT, and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 01:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC) Speedy tagged - no assertion of...
Click to read more »advertise for them.kle0012 | 16:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 16:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »Foundry (electronics) and delete the other. Fails WP:BAND, and probably WP:VSCA (now that is a helpful essay). ShadowHalo 01:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »nomination). Drat (Talk) 04:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 04:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. The article could...
Click to read more »vanicruftisement. Martijn Hoekstra 15:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:VSCA -- Dougie WII 16:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. Here be non-notable musician...
Click to read more »seems to be vanity piece. Emeraude 12:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:VSCA, plus WP:OR, and WP:NPOV. Definitely vanity. Delete. Cool BlueLight my Fire...
Click to read more »biography. —Quarl (talk) 2006-08-06 09:27Z Delete WP:NN. I'm temped to say WP:VSCA, but I'm not sure. Thε Halo Θ 12:51, 6 August 2006 (UTC) Delete — Non-notable...
Click to read more »minus the AFD template, it's blatant spam, it's NN, it's a little bit of WP:VSCA. TrackerTV 01:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:CORP. alphaChimp laudare...
Click to read more »Advertisement. Delete —Brim 23:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. More than likely WP:VSCA. Creator of article has no other contributions. --Kinu 23:10, 8 February...
Click to read more »subject, so clear case of WP:COI. The whole article is also 100% pure WP:VSCA with no references to WP:ARTIST. Eddie.willers (talk) 20:46, 31 October 2009...
Click to read more »GTBacchus(talk) 07:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, non-notable group, also reeks of WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 07:32, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete JuggleCruft - Oscar Arias 07:42...
Click to read more »above. ProhibitOnions 20:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, non-notable, WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 18:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »per Kinu Ruby 05:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Not well written and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 10:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom Prodego talk...
Click to read more »ranking [1] --TBC??? ??? ??? 02:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB, WP:VSCA, and WP:SPAM. Royboycrashfan 02:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, very much...
Click to read more »someone's video game clan--PatCheng 07:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. Just like every other video game clan. --Kinu 07:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA; poor sourcing and nothing substantial or independent found upon Gsearch...
Click to read more »a publisher of original thought or original research J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:50, 17 May 2006 (UTC) Delete original research and identified as such...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete spam Dlyons493 Talk 10:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Danny Lilithborne 20:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- zzuuzz...
Click to read more »vanispamcruftisement. Just zis Guy you know? 09:12, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Delete VSCA indeed. Kimchi.sg 10:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. --Coredesat 19:24...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:VSCA. Strays somewhat away from the subjects of its title. Note also the "my father"...
Click to read more »I cannot find any information that would add notability. And also the WP:VSCA problems noted by others above. Accounting4Taste:talk 18:12, 28 December...
Click to read more »Delete NN, possible vanity. Paddles 16:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 21:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC) Comment - This is reposted content...
Click to read more »non-notable company advert.--Isotope23 21:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA of an otherwise non-notable company. "We have offices"... should read, "We...
Click to read more »--B. Wolterding 15:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC) delete per nom, WP:SPA making WP:VSCA that fails WP:N and WP:V. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 15:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »deleted for violating copyright? Anyway, this article fails WP:N, WP:AUTO, WP:VSCA, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 17:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete WP:COI, WP:N.--John Lake 23:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. This is WP:VSCA, except by a musician instead of a company. --Seattle Skier (talk) 00:42...
Click to read more »WP is not a game site Amcfreely 06:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. --Kinu 07:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete Ample prescedent for deletion...
Click to read more »[email protected]. Ohconfucius 09:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Dennette 11:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete No notability established...
Click to read more »{chat} 17:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC) NN website community J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 01:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Deltabeignet 01:42, 19 January...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete per Sjakkalle CASE 01:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC) Delete. WP:VSCA. -- Krash (Talk) 14:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as self-rubbing. The website...
Click to read more »Werdna648T/C\@ 10:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Delete advert. Possible WP:VSCA. Stifle 16:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »cast+credits. Oscarthecat (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Delete as amdramcruft WP:VSCA. Pah! Eddie.willers (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »exist, other than in a user profile on neoseeker J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 00:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC) Delete. It looks meaningless to me. Catherine...
Click to read more »haver 09:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete Please! WP:OR, WP:NOT, WP:VSCA. Thε Halo Θ 11:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per above. -- zzuuzz (talk)...
Click to read more »the subject is notable under WP:ATHLETE, there is more than a whiff of WP:VSCA about this when one considers that his team-mates are all redlinked. The...
Click to read more »not Alexa rankable, obviously, since it's hosted on Blogspot. Likely WP:VSCA, as author is User:Brendonconnelly. Weak Google presence; most results are...
Click to read more »NeoJustin 18:03, December 31, 2005 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFT, WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:VSCA, and WP:BALLS. Stifle 13:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »self-promotion. --Stormie 14:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Delete. Not notable, WP:VSCA, promo piece. Mr Stephen 19:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Delete. A very new publication...
Click to read more »-wizzard2k (C•T•D) 03:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Delete Per nom and wizzard2k. WP:VSCA, Crystalballery and does not meet the web notability guidelines. Thewinchester...
Click to read more »been inserting linkspam for this website in various other articles. Pure WP:VSCA. -- Fan-1967 18:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Delete Speedily with prejudice...
Click to read more »January 2006 (UTC) Guilds for online MMORPG, delete J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 04:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC) Comment- Actually, they are guilds in a single...
Click to read more »July 2010 (UTC) Strong Delete - should have been speedied - 100% pure WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 13:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »July 2006 (UTC) Self-promotional spam for a web hosting company. Fails WP:VSCA -- Netsnipe (Talk) 05:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Obvious delete - per nom...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. Avi 20:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as per WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 20:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, does not appear to meet...
Click to read more »23:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, non-notable, unencyclopedic blogcruft/VSCA. --Kinu t/c 00:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC) Delete nn. Eivind 02:45, 9 March 2006...
Click to read more »it climbs enough Dlyons493 Talk 20:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. --Dennette 23:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete without Prejudice per Uucp...
Click to read more »NawlinWiki 17:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC) Delete should be one of the examples of WP:VSCA — MrDolomite | Talk 03:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per above. Pruneautalk...
Click to read more »Delete per nom; fails WP:WEB --TBC??? ??? ??? 01:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC) WP:VSCA as it is. Delete. Royboycrashfan 01:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Is ok you can...
Click to read more »mark the difference between an article and an advertiseement. I call WP:VSCA. User's other edits include adding Relenta to some other articles and creating...
Click to read more »discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Strong delete WP:VSCA — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 09:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »WP:WEB, "202 registered users" per the site (er, forum) itself. Possible WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 05:30, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Delete - non-notable. Possible nonsense...
Click to read more »advertising. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 04:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per above--TBC??? ??? ?...
Click to read more »appropatie for WP Regan123 13:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - listcruft, WP:VSCA. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 13:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Delete- Inapropriate, useless...
Click to read more »Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 05:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete Delete as WP:VSCA, just another *cruft article about a non-notable organisation that does not...
Click to read more »and movies. article created and nominated for deletion J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 03:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC) This is an AMAZING song from Pink Floyd's Momentary...
Click to read more »Martins and Odeiomate. Ohconfucius 06:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA that fails WP:V. Claims his 104 year old father impregnated his 85 year old...
Click to read more »I am bringing here. JChap 19:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Burn at the stake. WP:VSCA and WP:OR. Sandstein 19:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC) LOL - this seems rather logical...
Click to read more »The result was Keep. KrakatoaKatie 08:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC) Delete: WP:VSCA. No reliable sources given for verification. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:42, 23...
Click to read more »per nom. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 18:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, VSCA. Daniel Case 19:52, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Its description doesn't...
Click to read more »07:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC) Delete; fails WP:WEB, forumcruft, likely WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 08:00, 25 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, non-notable website. If...
Click to read more »a barnstar) 17:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:WEB, likely WP:VSCA since it includes the obligatory "1337 p0st3rz" list. --Kinu t/c 21:30, 10...
Click to read more »sources for this. Most edits were by WP:SPAs and numbered IPs, so it's also WP:VSCA. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:MUSIC. Borderline...
Click to read more »The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC) Delete: WP:VSCA. No reliable sources given for verification. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:40, 23...
Click to read more »balls•strikes 02:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:CORP, looks like WP:VSCA. Not sure of speedy status, though. --Kinu t/c 02:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WP:GNG & WP:BIO --RrburkeekrubrR 13:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC) Delete - WP:VSCA, WP:COI - it's all been said before. - Richard Cavell (talk) 13:43, 9 January...
Click to read more »editing this article. Bucketsofg 15:12, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 23:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 05:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete Delete as WP:VSCA, just another *cruft article about a non-notable organisation that does not...
Click to read more »24 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB, WP:CRUFT, WP:VAIN, WP:SPAM, and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 03:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Delete non-notable. --Siva1979Talk...
Click to read more »--lightdarkness (talk) 01:20, 28 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 01:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC) Delete Spam. Bige1977 01:27, 28...
Click to read more »Delete. Non-notable web company with Alexa rank of 114,806; reeks of WP:VSCA. --Kinu 23:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Spammy. No Guru 00:10, 9 February...
Click to read more »it as part of their legal name, but not advertised J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 16:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive...
Click to read more »Oreo man 20:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Delete as Conancruft (or more likely WP:VSCA). Created and primarily edited by a handful of IPs, suggesting WP:COI issues...
Click to read more »Delete. Not notable, except maybe for local or cruft interest; reeks of WP:VSCA. --Kinu 03:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Ruby 04:00, 5 February...
Click to read more »14:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG … pure WP:VSCA. Happy Editing! — 72.75.57.223 (talk · contribs) 23:35, 14 July 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »instead of just links I have to agree with the nomination and will add WP:VSCA as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Strong delete per...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article's style appears to be WP:VSCA, a promotion of an unremarkable organization. References are not cited. Actually...
Click to read more »small business. — Indi [ talk ] 21:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. The company's website (Alexa: 4,591,364) doesn't make it seem too notable...
Click to read more »of speedy A1 by rather less than the article pushes the boundaries of WP:VSCA. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 20:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC) More advertising...
Click to read more »article, advert, delete. Fourohfour 16:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC) Delete. WP:VSCA. -- Krash (Talk) 16:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC) Delete. Ad, vanity, wp:web. Many...
Click to read more »Strategy Planet. The article definitely needs to be rewritten to remove the VSCA feeling I got when looking at it. If it can't be redone, then nuke it. Torinir...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Delete & Salt. Clear case of WP:COI and WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 01:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Delete. I found this article...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete as vanity. Fan1967 18:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, WP:VSCA for the WP:BIO-failing founder of a WP:WEB-failing site. --Kinu t/c 18:59...
Click to read more »AFD disscussion from taking place on KMC - Comic Forums J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 14:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Delete Possibly speediable as nearly empty, but...
Click to read more »Delete Vanity. --Aking 20:42, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as non-notable WP:VSCA. --Kinu 20:51, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Delete - evident autobiographical/advertisement/vanity...
Click to read more »11 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:WEB and is likely in violation of WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 06:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as nn website. --Terence Ong...
Click to read more »band isn't notable. Average Earthman 23:15, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA and failing WP:MUSIC. --Kinu t/c 23:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »a publisher of original thought or original research J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC) Delete OR Just zis Guy you know? 21:30, 17 May...
Click to read more »unsigned comment was added by 61.68.210.149 (talk • contribs) . Delete per WP:VSCA and so on. Stifle 09:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »anivayamspayuftcrayisementyay. Royal Blue T/C 02:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 04:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, per WP:WEB. Bad...
Click to read more »(AFD tag was removed by Samaster1991 (talk • contribs) )J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Delete as nn. Sue Anne 21:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »18:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Delete both as WP:SPAM, obvious non-notable, WP:VSCA crystal ballery. --Kinu t/c 20:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Delete both, unknown...
Click to read more »05:51, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB, WP:VAIN, WP:SPAM, and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 06:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Delete please per Roy & TBC. StarryEyes...
Click to read more »same editor). Phil | Talk 06:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC) Delete Textbook WP:VSCA. Danny Lilithborne 06:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per above. MER-C...
Click to read more »Starblind 01:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC) delete per WP:MUSIC WP:N WP:RS WP:OR WP:VSCA. There are actually no third-party sources, only promo sites for the band...
Click to read more »player with the same name. yandman 15:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Delete. WP:VSCA. WTF is a 'slammaster', anyway? The Crying Orc 16:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete per above. Funnybunny 03:24, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:VSCA, fails WP:WEB. Royboycrashfan 03:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete as...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, spam. Sandstein 11:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC) Delete both WP:VSCA. Also fails WP:WEB. Thε Halo Θ 11:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »good bout of vanity. - Mgm|(talk) 08:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Dennette 09:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete - per my nom. Victoriagirl...
Click to read more »08:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, Alexa rank of 90,209. This screams WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 09:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nomination, non-notable...
Click to read more »finality. Xoloz 16:55, 8 September 2006 (UTC) I smell pork. Delete per WP:VSCA. Appears to be posted by the company personnel, so arguably consent for reproduction...
Click to read more »(UTC) delete good old fashioned vanispamcruftisement J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 23:57, 31 December 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »a publisher of original thought or original research J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC) Delete OR Just zis Guy you know? 21:30, 17 May...
Click to read more »for failure to abide by WP:MUSIC and for being an obvious violation of WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 14:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Delete a myspace page and...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete for failure to meet WP:MUSIC and bearing a stagnant whiff of WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 02:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »thereof. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 02:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as VSCA. Also, several of the "Japanese-based styles" purported in the article are...
Click to read more »me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Delete Blatant WP:VSCA by a fan that lacks WP:RS to satisfy either WP:BIO or even WP:GNG. Happy...
Click to read more »Gazpacho and nom. Michael Greiner 01:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Dennette 11:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »was removed without comment. --Hetar 01:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. Brian G. Crawford 01:30, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Metamagician3000...
Click to read more »This article fails all those, as well as being suspiciously close to WP:VSCA. I'll also assert it fails WP:N. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 17:47, 15 November...
Click to read more »10 July 2006 (UTC) Delete, non-notable, WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 03:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Only a small handful of submissions and frankly...
Click to read more »confer notability. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA Ohconfucius ¡digame! 08:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Delete. In order to meet...
Click to read more »Delete. Failure to establish notability wrt WP:BIO; suspect this is also WP:VSCA and hence there is also WP:COI between subject & author. Eddie.willers (talk)...
Click to read more »written. discospinster 01:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB, WP:VSCA, and WP:SPAM. Royboycrashfan 01:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Delete Non-notable...
Click to read more »single-purpose account with a name similar to the artist. Fails WP:N, WP:VSCA, WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:RS. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 17:39, 15 November 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »was prompted by concerns about copyright violation (and the text read like VSCA as well). Wafulz has deleted the copyrighted text. Therefore the reason for...
Click to read more »been deleted as CSD A7 x 2. Doing AFD to reach consensus J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 07:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete and have reapplied your tag for...
Click to read more »Delete, spamvertisement. Catamorphism 03:04, 25 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 03:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- Ned Scott 03:50...
Click to read more »17:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC) Delete. Obvious instance of WP:NFP and of WP:VSCA. Venicemenace 18:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »May 2007 (UTC) Delete as promotional material. (Not quite bad enough for VSCA, though.) The article was created by Earthling plus (talk · contribs), whose...
Click to read more »speedy candidate. Paddles TC 14:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete per WP:VSCA. Just misses a speedy, though. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 10:04, 22 July 2006...
Click to read more »January 2006 (UTC) WP is not a free hosting provider. J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 05:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT. Dbtfz 05:11, 19 January...
Click to read more »novel is still red-linked. JeffW 05:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. I can't imagine people searching for "Naa" looking for this. ;)Royboycrashfan...
Click to read more »to comixPedia. - Hahnchen 23:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as per WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 00:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, first time I've seen...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, this is what WP:NEO was written for, with an icky WP:COI/WP:VSCA topping. (See Thump25 (talk · contribs)) No sources other than self-promoting...
Click to read more »CharacterZero 03:44, 21 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:VAIN, WP:NOT, and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 03:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom and RoyBoy. Joe...
Click to read more »| Talk 07:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC) The Emperor Has Deleted Clothes - VSCA. Need I say more? Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options...
Click to read more »Bio, mostly a legal brief and link to external site J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 21:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC) NB This "article" had already been speedy...
Click to read more »this title in the 1980s. 23skidoo 13:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Dennette 03:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete Per WP:WEB Michael Billington...
Click to read more »--lightdarkness 17:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:BALLS and WP:VSCA. Stifle 16:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »solely for the purpose of self-promotion, and has all the hallmarks of WP:VSCA. Additionally, the previous nomination noted potential WP:COI issues arising...
Click to read more »Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 04:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete Delete as WP:VSCA, just another *cruft article about a non-notable organisation that does not...
Click to read more »Nigel (Talk) 12:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Shades of WP:VSCA. OBM | blah blah blah 12:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Delete Smells like a...
Click to read more »silly editing of it. -- Curps 01:41, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as per WP:VSCA. Royal Blue T/C 02:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete as A7. Fails...
Click to read more »the Wikipedia project, is the owner of the site as well, which implies WP:VSCA at work here. --Kinu t/c 00:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per Kinu. Nukefactory...
Click to read more »somehow a precedent for keeping this because WP:VSCA survived an MfD is more of an argument that WP:VSCA should be nominated for deletion again as well...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Delete - fails to meet WP:N and reeks of WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »quite a Speedy Delete, does assert some notabiliy J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 23:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC) First of all, Merrium-Webster has no definition...
Click to read more »the band's own website. Edited by SPAs, fails WP:OR and WP:V, obvious WP:VSCA, and so on. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Delete NN...
Click to read more »Bobby1011 04:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC) Reply to comment by nominator: See WP:VSCA. Daniel Case 04:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC) Comment I've honestly never heared...
Click to read more »Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 21:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. ColourBurst 00:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC) AFD relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »apparently added by company members and article reads like a brochure, failing WP:VSCA Article introduces Neologism WP:NEO Article was added prior to an exhibition...
Click to read more »Adambro (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC) Delete as pure, homespun, WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 14:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC) Delete: I can't find significant...
Click to read more »--Kilo-Lima 16:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC) delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 21:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC) Keep — Non-notable to you maybe, but this...
Click to read more »Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 05:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete Delete as WP:VSCA, just another *cruft article about a non-notable organisation that does not...
Click to read more »23:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT a crystal ball and likely WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 01:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:50...
Click to read more »website. -- RHaworth 01:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 02:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC) Delete I agree with the proposer...
Click to read more »attempt to self promote another of their wesites and should be deleted. See WP:VSCA 10:34, 17 March 2006 The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the...
Click to read more »說嗎? 15:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Unlikely to be notable, appears to be WP:VSCA. If kept, split and disambig. Stifle (talk) 23:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC) Weak...
Click to read more »unreferenced article appears to run counter to WP:WEB, WP:V, WP:NOT, WP:VSCA, and probably almost every other Wikipedia policy, guideline, and essay....
Click to read more »2 be not deleted? ElGeko 04:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per MER-C, VSCA all the way. The Rambling Man 14:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom...
Click to read more »doktorb wordsdeeds 18:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per above and perhaps WP:VSCA. I see no guideline which says local stations are notable. --Wine Guy Talk...
Click to read more »Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 04:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete Per nom as WP:VSCA. Another non-notable organisation which doesn't meet the policy and has a...
Click to read more »landed a Number 1 spot on the charts. already created J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 05:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC) the winneconne school system in winneconne...
Click to read more »good at it. Fan 02:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Blatant WP:VSCA of the bloggy variety. If your website is hosted at freewebs.com, I'm going...
Click to read more »and there is a NPOV issue. Jakken 00:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. WP:VSCA. --Kinu 01:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as vanispamcruftisement. Who...
Click to read more »BaseballBaby 10:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Delete - violates WP:NN and WP:VSCA ... should also AfD Robert Bechtle by the same author for the same reasons...
Click to read more »Fails every basis for inclusion we appeal to: WP:WEB, WP:NN, WP:NFT, WP:VSCA, etc., and probably WP:VAIN--Fuhghettaboutit 01:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »unsigned comment added by 200.122.153.34 (talk • contribs) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 23:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Keep I think it's fine. Real organization...
Click to read more »think some random Blogspot blog meets WP:WEB. I'd venture to guess it's WP:VSCA as well. --Kinu t/c 07:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC) Dont delete, he's actually...
Click to read more »the highly original subject matter of it's songs. Ian Roure Delete as WP:VSCA and failing WP:V --Dennette 10:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC) I think there should...
Click to read more »Kamalabadi 01:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as blatant advertisement. WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 01:40, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Delete nn Where (talk) 02:06,...
Click to read more »reviews? I personally vote delete because the article was originally WP:VSCA written by a WP:SPA, though I've cleaned it up; however, I'm open to have...
Click to read more »AFD template has been removed several times by author J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 05:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Speedy and send to Wiki-Hell! Jamyskis Whisper...
Click to read more »non-notable; contested by editors. Delete as non-notable club, and as WP:VSCA-magnet for its members, apparently. Kinu t/c 05:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Comment:...
Click to read more »address. I vote delete. Jaxal1 16:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. --Aaron 17:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per Aaron. Jabencarsey 04:12...
Click to read more »some sort of inside joke.--Nick Y. 22:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC) Delete - WP:VSCA - Richardcavell 22:45, 25 May 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete per Stubblyhead Zero...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. If this is their website, then this meets the criteria for WP:VSCA. --Kinu 05:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete, vanispamcruftisement. Royboycrashfan...
Click to read more »Speedy Delete and Salt Per nom and ors. It's bad enough the article is WP:VSCA, but having already been deleted twice before... it needs to be dealt with...
Click to read more »Delete - non notable Tawker 02:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA and WP:NFT. Pretty much seals the deal on non-notability if your webspace...
Click to read more »doesn't list him as an officer. Doesn't satisfactorily meet WP:BIO. Also WP:VSCA, as page was created by the subject, User:Keithrhodes. Delete with optional...
Click to read more »the secret of notability is to have reliable sources write about you. WP:VSCA in every way. --Dhartung | Talk 20:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »failure of WP:BIO and WP:GNG, I detect a strong whiff of WP:PEACOCK and WP:VSCA. There is also the issue of the potential for WP:COI through the initial...
Click to read more »a publisher of original thought or original research J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC) Delete. This is an essay.--Esprit15d 20:47, 17...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy Delete 216.141.226.190 12:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA, protect the deleted page if necessary. Make sure to get rid of all incoming...
Click to read more »Delete. Spamvertisement. Mystache 16:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. The Forbes article is a directory listing, and heavens knows how many "best...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:02, 13 February 2006 (UTC) Delete Yet another reason to mention WP:VSCA. Makemi 06:34, 13 February 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete We need a speedy category...
Click to read more »delete this article. Herostratus 03:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC) delete per WP:VSCA. Non notable. Generic, non registerable phrase and concept dressed up as...
Click to read more »let's see: WP:single-purpose account, WP:EDITWAR, WP:BK, WP:BIO, WP:RS, WP:VSCA, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:AUTO, WP:COI, WP:SNOW. Qworty (talk) 09:43, 6 June 2008...
Click to read more »Delete - Totally lacking WP:RS to support WP:BAND or even WP:GNG … pure WP:VSCA. Happy Editing! — 70.21.12.213 (talk · contribs) 01:37, 17 September 2011...
Click to read more »this article remained for 8 years when it is speediable? Reads almost as WP:VSCA but I don't think it is vanity. - Richard Cavell (talk) 13:30, 9 January...
Click to read more »deletion, advertizing is not one of the WP:CSD. Delete, meanwhile, per WP:VSCA. Stifle 23:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC) This would have been an obvious keep given...
Click to read more »(UTC) It's unlikely, but check out WP:CORP and the relevant links from WP:VSCA. Leave me a message on my talk page if you want specific help.--Chaser T...
Click to read more »advertisement and quasi-vanity. Bucketsofg 14:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle 23:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Keep. Good nomination, but I don't see...
Click to read more »{{prod}} tag. Article is a advertisement for website. J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 01:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC) Merge content with Hispanic Business Inc., where...
Click to read more »end, the article is fine. Ac@osr 09:11, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 22:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Keep - simply needs cleaning up...
Click to read more »WP:VANITY refers. (aeropagitica) 16:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete both as WP:VSCA (as blatantly indicated above) and the former as not meeting WP:BIO as well...
Click to read more »more than one outlet, but their own website says it's the only one ... WP:VSCA, pure and simple. —72.75.73.158 (talk · contribs) 22:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »that fails WP:CORP.--Jersey Devil 06:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA. Fails WP:CORP. Thε Halo Θ 11:19, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete per...
Click to read more »notable, conflict of interest (self-written), advertising. (basically WP:VSCA) Dougie WII 06:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Keep The radio station was first...
Click to read more »it's acceptable. f(x)=ax2+bx+c 17:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA, along with equally NN Larry Lucio. --141.156.232.179 21:55, 21 September...
Click to read more »? ??? ??? 04:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VAIN, WP:NOT, and WP:VSCA. Letters from the editors? Come on. Royboycrashfan 04:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »advertisement. King of Hearts | (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Delete: nn, WP:VSCA. --Kinu 00:24, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Comment Was speedied against policy...
Click to read more »delete as above. NawlinWiki 13:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete, blatant WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 14:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk...
Click to read more »May 2006 (UTC) Delete spam --Nick Y. 00:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Stifle (talk) 20:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC) Keep - The company was written up...
Click to read more »freeloaders. Get 'em off our encyclo.! Camillus (talk) Delete. Non-notable, WP:VSCA. --Kinu 01:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. Advertisement. EdGl 01:37, 5...
Click to read more »advertising. Bongomatic 06:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC) Delete (see below) total WP:VSCA Beeblebrox (talk) 06:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »pretty much heating pads. Kevin_b_er 07:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:VSCA, apply directly to the forehead. Danny Lilithborne 07:44, 22 August 2006...
Click to read more »deletions. -- Garrie 05:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - NN MySpace band. WP:VSCA. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 14:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC) "Upfunk Creek features the...
Click to read more »and editing Suze Orman to add another link to TrustedID. Both articles are VSCA and should be deleted. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 02:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete advert Avi 21:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA and WP:V. Stifle 19:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »websites? I think not. - Hahnchen 23:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as per WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 00:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as nom. -- Mithent 00:47...
Click to read more »blonde girl is pretty, though. Eivind 10:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, vsca. Alexa is hot, tho. Chris Chan.talk.contribs 15:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »like bandspam. Seriously, it doesn't even try to be encyclopedic. It's WP:VSCA and fails WP:RS. Almost qualifies under CSD:G11. Also, unfortunately, because...
Click to read more »--HubHikari 20:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC) fixed afd nomination J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 20:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC) Delete Not sure about the OR call, but sufficiently...
Click to read more »(❝?!❞) 19:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC) delete - I may be prejudiced against WP:VSCA originating from WP:SPAs. However, the original author did post on the talk...
Click to read more »Uncyclopedia, folks. -- Scientizzle 00:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA and WP:NOT. Royboycrashfan 00:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Delete per above. Optionally...
Click to read more »academics. Guy (Help!) 19:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC) Delete: It's classic WP:VSCA. JzG is dead-on in spotting the Guardian article as just being churnalism...
Click to read more »article just doesn't cut it. WilyD 12:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP:VSCA --Dennette 04:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as above. Nickieee 00:18...
Click to read more »09:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, does not meet WP:SOFTWARE, likely WP:VSCA; WP:SNOW applies. --Kinu t/c 07:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as non-notable...
Click to read more »a billboard. --Elkman - (talk) 05:04, 30 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 06:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC) Delete, vanispamcruftisment. --Terence...
Click to read more »07:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per every listing here J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 15:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per Jake's mom (I mean, per nom). OhNoitsJamieTalk...
Click to read more »as well. Spinach Dip 22:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. NN WP:VSCA. - Crockspot 00:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Delete No evidence of notability...
Click to read more »no reliable sources to back up claims, I could go on but i'll label it WP:VSCA and be done. Thewinchester (talk) 13:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC) I am inclined...
Click to read more »Can't find any evidence of notability. On a side note, I didn't even know WP:VSCA existed o.O --Scottie theNerd 18:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Heh, though I'm not...
Click to read more »self-published book with zero secondary or tertiary sources. A possible WP:VSCA. LeaveSleaves 17:24, 4 January 2009 (UTC) ""Save"" The editors of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »(UTC) Non notable website, with coveted 1 google link J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 16:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC) This is my website, and if you follow the...
Click to read more »notablility, this is a perfect storm of non-notability. Also, potential WP:VSCA per the lengthy description of the entire storyline and links to every single...
Click to read more »--kingboyk 01:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Delete Vanity site J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 01:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Delete. I would say the MUSH itself might be...
Click to read more »killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA, that is WP:NOTGUIDE, lack of independent reliable secondary sources and...
Click to read more »7 August 2006 (UTC) Redirect to Vehicle identification number. Utter WP:VSCA crap. I don't even get what this is about, some sort of biometric ID process...
Click to read more »Vozenilek 19:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as non-notable, forumcrufty WP:VSCA. I chuckled at the list of regular readers and participants, though... as...
Click to read more »company --TBC??? ??? ??? 01:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:CORP and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan 02:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. --Siva1979Talk...
Click to read more »above me. Danny Lilithborne 02:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VSCA. Non-notable religion mad up to sell energy drink. Even the follower above...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) strong delete. Utterly fails eveything. Blatant promospam. WP:VSCA. I tried editing the article to try to make it masquerade as encyclopedic...
Click to read more »(T | C) 04:22, 2 January 2006 (UTC) delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 04:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC) Comment - Hi JHMM13 and Jwestbrook. We wrote...
Click to read more »Firefox, which tells me it won't validate as W3C HTML J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 22:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC) Mets or who ever you are, it does not say register...
Click to read more »nomination. --Wingsandsword 03:59, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as likely WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 05:45, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 08:18...
Click to read more »• contribs) 01:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete This is just WP:VSCA copied from User:The Daily Reel's page ... should also AfD Jamie Patricof...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Reasons the page should be deleted: WP:VSCA and WP:NPOV. As an aside, Kleinenberg isn't notable enough to be listed in...
Click to read more »game for deletion. --Xrblsnggt 04:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Delete. Pure WP:VSCA. How ironic that a company "best known for antispam technology" is spamming...
Click to read more »content from another article (also under afd) and reeking strongly of WP:VSCA. Eddie.willers (talk) 02:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC) As I said on the Sexy Backs...
Click to read more »recreation of a normal article on the evangelist. This stuff is pure WP:VSCA - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 14:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Delete - Essentially...
Click to read more »Smells like original research but not absolutely sure J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 00:54, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Delete nn crank. Ashibaka tock 02:15, 19 January...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) delete per WP:LIVING and lack of WP:RS. Also, it's blatant WP:VSCA; is there a speedy criterion for deleting spam? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:24...
Click to read more »user page" tag Deizio 22:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC) Delete -- NN business, WP:VSCA, though possibly minus the C. But I wouldn't argue the point. Haikupoet 04:37...
Click to read more »RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 02:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:VSCA. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Artw 14:46...
Click to read more »"popular". Lankiveil 13:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC). Delete Per nom and ors as WP:VSCA. Thewinchester (talk) 22:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Redirect to Meshel Laurie/...
Click to read more »