Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
alternative to showing our readers a banner related to donations (see WP:VPPR#Don't run any donation banners until the union-busting is completely ended)...
Click to read more »how would this be accomplished? Cheeseinacan (talk) The Village Pump (WP:VPPR or WP:VPT) is the best place for this sort of question. Tevildo (talk) 22:53...
Click to read more »This page will serve as WP:RFCBEFORE and a draft for a future RFC at WP:VPPR. Normally, SecurePoll elections are created on https://vote.wikimedia.org...
Click to read more »The smaller box is probably done with javascript anyway. Discuss at WP:VPPR. Add a box, on article pages, for readers to point out errors without learning...
Click to read more »Ak-eater06 (talk) 18:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC) Hello, Ak-eater06. I think WP:VPPR would be a good place to start. ColinFine (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for this somewhere, though. If we can't think of a more specific venue, WP:VPPR will work. Enterprisey (talk!) 03:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Hi. Not very familiar...
Click to read more »involved in the "thick" of the portal debates (I have only just read WP:VPPR#Proposal to delete Portal space this morning, having been made aware of it...
Click to read more »you as not such, you have got to pump the brakes. (WP:AGF) Archive 199 of VPPR Robbie Coltrane RFC on Talk:2022 Barbara Walters RFC on Talk:2022 Long-term...
Click to read more »you think this should be clarified, feel free to suggest a change at WP:VPPR or WT:GA / WT:FA. If you believe a certain article is too complicated to...
Click to read more »no way that the group could have been stopped because of the creation of VPPR. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC) (Or maybe you were thinking...
Click to read more »opt-in that the trial can address? — xaosflux Talk 23:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC) VPPR discussion started. Enterprisey (talk!) (formerly APerson) 03:26, 31 May...
Click to read more »tagged as orphans, and removes the tag if it is no longer applicable WP:VPPR#Proposal to move the Orphan tags to the talk page – (successful) proposal...
Click to read more »specifically do you want to change? This may very well not require a full VPPR discussion to make a color tweak. — xaosflux Talk 14:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »be coupled to the fate of the process. I have proposed reviving ADREV at VPPR. If there is consensus against it, I'll happily G7 the template. Regards...
Click to read more »this is to understand. Stop making any changes to reflist formats until the VPPR proposal concludes with consensus in your favor. It's not rocket science...
Click to read more »MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC) Moved from WP:VPPR § What should we do to 2607:fb90::/32 – Enterprisey (talk!) 08:54, 3 August...
Click to read more »links from titles in cite templates (i.e. delinking title) at least until WP:VPPR#Issues raised by Citation bot has reached a conclusion, which may or may...
Click to read more »administrator, which I think is problematic. I'd welcome a discussion at WP:VPPR or some other suitable venue on how to handle requests like this. --Stefan2...
Click to read more »29&dq=%22otto+olsson%22&ei=vP9hR4D6FJnuiQHxgp35Bg&sig=aYSw0gwbmYYmkiNbwHxVPpr_AO. 2007-12-14 02:59:11: User en:Morinao (talk - contribs) to en:Jackson...
Click to read more »myself wherever needed. :) :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 08:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC) WP:VPPR is one possible place, though a separate RfC page in the project space would...
Click to read more »with previous practice. Also, the RfC was advertised on WT:RFA, WP:AN, WP:VPPR, WP:VPP, WP:CENT, and on the watchlist notices (perhaps I've even forgotten...
Click to read more »(and a few others) happen to disagree with me was posted by me to WP:AN, WP:VPPR, WP:CENT and WP:BON. Many editors in that discussion have no problem communicating...
Click to read more »getting enough input on this is important. I have posted it at WP:CENT and WP:VPPR and will also post notices at the bot owners noticeboard. Feel free to drop...
Click to read more »22:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC) A similar suggestion is being discussed at WP:VPPR#Proposal to delete Portal space. Certes (talk) 07:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Is there a place i can read to where they discussed the change? See WP:VPPR#Replace "+" with "add new comment". Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:43, 19 April 2008...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: The RfC this was based on (WP:VPPR#RFC: Citation Style 1 parameter naming convention has been closed again,...
Click to read more »WP:VPPR. Personally I think that this not a good idea, and I suggest that it is dropped now, however, if you wish to continue it then take it to WP:VPPR...
Click to read more »consensus on pages such as WP:VPPR and RFCs, but not many people commented on them. What I could do is list the discussion on VPPR, make it a RFC, and add a...
Click to read more »code for this; previous discussions include a June 2009 VPPR thread and a a August 2014 VPPR thread; current discussions include a bot request and a bot...
Click to read more »search of a problem. In any case, I suggest that you start a new post at WP:VPPR, where this should have been located in the first place (as I should have...
Click to read more »anyway) to be fairly straightforward, technically. I suggest you post at WP:VPPR (without the first two sentences, and the last sentence, above, which don't...
Click to read more »proposal, not something currently available, you might want to post at WP:VPPR. To keep the suggestion practical - to avoid the problem that ais523 mentioned...
Click to read more »at VPPR WT:MED So that's it from a technical point of view. As to if this sort of change should be going on, please join the discussion at WP:VPPR so...
Click to read more »23:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC) You may want to move this discussion to WP:VPPR, as a proposal. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Is it...
Click to read more »technical aspects to it, it would appear this would be better posted at WP:VPPR than at this page. Yeah, I mean the sister projects like commons. Typically...
Click to read more »userpage for no reason. "This user is interested in RfCs": rather similar VPPR posts which mostly get speedy closed: Ilovemydoodle (rename AFD to VFD),...
Click to read more »(UTC) Like usual, feel free to move this to the idea lab if too early for VPPR. Aasim (talk) 05:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC) CSD proposals should be at WT:CSD...
Click to read more »23:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC) You may want to move this discussion to WP:VPPR, as a proposal. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC) ←I'm...
Click to read more »(UTC) I put the proposal here because this venue was slightly favored over VPPR in the discussion where we closed WP:Gadget/proposals. (The editors in the...
Click to read more »Traditionalist (talk) 17:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC) Last month, I made a proposal at WP:VPPR about gradually enabling VisualEditor alongside the wikitext editor for new...
Click to read more »proposal, not something currently available, you might want to post at WP:VPPR. To keep the suggestion practical - to avoid the problem that ais523 mentioned...
Click to read more »August 2013 (UTC) I've spent a little time searching the archives of the VPPR concerning account registration. Most of today's websites require clicking...
Click to read more »99#RFC, which was the RFC here to overturn the original CENT-listed RFC at VPPR that requested the bolding in the first place? WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:52...
Click to read more »you to place templates where their code is not? There is a discussion on VPPR about infoboxes scaring new editors away from the leads of articles. I am...
Click to read more »"fix" the personal-links section on the top of the page, as described at VPPR. In Vector, the bar at the top stretches across ~1/3 of my screen; more than...
Click to read more »ideas (both technical or non-technical) would be most welcome. Please see WP:VPPR#When GeoCities shuts down, how should we handle links to its sites?. —— Shakescene...
Click to read more »Pump, though. Simply open this section for editing, open another tab for WP:VPPR and add a new section there, then select all of the text in this section...
Click to read more »our family. Yet, here I am, addicted to Wikipedia, replying to a random VPPR. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • C • L) 11:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC) So awareness...
Click to read more »they never heard about it; I've seen a CENT-listed, month-long RFC here at VPPR, with 20+ editors supporting it and nobody opposing it, get overturned because...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Moved to WP:AN § What should we do to 2607:fb90::/32 (moved from VPPR) – Enterprisey (talk!) 08:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC) Whoa, this range is affecting...
Click to read more »VisualEditor, so here's one for all of you: James F. has started a discussion at WP:VPPR about offering VisualEditor to inexperienced editors. All new accounts already...
Click to read more »people complain that you're "hiding" the discussion (or part of it). WP:VPPR may have set a new record last week, when it reached a rather staggering...
Click to read more »problem is that they may have URAA-restored copyright. I have suggested at WP:VPPR#Allow images previously disallowed because of URAA copyright restoration...
Click to read more »alternative to showing our readers a banner related to donations (see WP:VPPR#Don't run any donation banners until the union-busting is completely ended)...
Click to read more »discussion taking place on whether to wrap signatures in markup in progress at VPPR. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC) Is there a process whereby...
Click to read more »that all portals should be deleted. That point is still being debated at VPPR and your argument might be more appropriate there. Certes (talk) 10:41, 19...
Click to read more »community input. A notification to the community has been placed at AN and VPPR --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:22, 31 October 2010 (UTC) As an indicator...
Click to read more »Good ideas, but if you want discussion, it looks like you should post at WP:VPPR instead. And I suggest (a) shortening your post (less elaboration will result...
Click to read more »15:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC) @Dodger67 and Glaisher: You could post to WP:VPPR, but I think WP:VPT might be better. And I fully agree that tab labels should...
Click to read more »December 2017 (UTC) Wouldn't that be WP:VPPR#RfC: Three Strikes Rule for AfC submissions and reviews? The VPP and VPPR redirect to their own respective pages...
Click to read more »People feel like they've done their part by posting their opinion to WP:VPPR, but that really doesn't accomplish much; it's more like slacktivism. Tisane...
Click to read more »note there saying that enabling/disabling such feature can be done at WP:VPPR. Pinging Shearonink, BlackcurrantTea, and Lugnuts to this thread. George...
Click to read more »Day-of-the-Year could be set up fairly easily. You might want to post at WP:VPPR, making a proposal that someone set this up. Personally, I think it would...
Click to read more »of comment. If you have a concrete proposal, you might want to post at WP:VPPR. Or you could look at the "Maps" topic in the Editor's index; for example...
Click to read more »nevertheless Serten (talk) 20:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC) I am moving this to here from VPPR after it got reverted there ···Vanischenu (mc/talk) 13:36, 21 March 2014...
Click to read more »this, if I get around to it. ― Qwerfjkltalk 06:12, 20 May 2022 (UTC) See WP:VPPR#Preserve at Wikidata?. As I said there, there doesn't have to be any bureaucracy...
Click to read more »is missing or invalid. Certes (talk) 15:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC) See WP:VPPR#Preserve at Wikidata?. As I said there, there doesn't have to be any bureaucracy...
Click to read more »editors on select articles soon, and maybe on every article eventually; a VPPR discussion will be opened about that once there's enough feedback here. Enterprisey (talk...
Click to read more »questions about the UI is at the Village Pump, Lightbluerain: either WP:VPPR or WP:VPT. --ColinFine (talk) 18:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC) @Lightbluerain:...
Click to read more »question I have: where would it be most appropriate for the RfC to reside — on VPPR or as its own page? (I plan to link to it from WP:CENT either way.) It'd...
Click to read more »This will probability require wider discussion. May I suggest posting at WP:VPPR? If no-one objects, or confronts, let me know. --Mdann52talk to me! 06:10...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Speedy keep: well-established; WP:VPR/WP:VPPR is the shortcut for proposals. Per Xaosflux. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:36...
Click to read more »suppose a third alternative for discussing such a proposal would be at WP:VPPR. But really - the table of contents, plus avoiding long sections (and long...
Click to read more »xaosflux Talk 12:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC) I've opened a discussion at VPPR. Thank you all very much for the input. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:25, 18 September...
Click to read more »multiple templates everywhere, best start at some place like WP:RFC or WP:VPPR. JamieS93 13:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Delete - It should be clear in the lead...
Click to read more »Enterprisey (talk!) (formerly APerson) 03:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC) See also this VPPR thread started during the BRFA at a BAG member's request. Enterprisey (talk...
Click to read more »access levels on other websites I've seen. ViperSnake151, why don't you try VPPR? APerson (talk!) 13:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC) ViperSnake151, you might want...
Click to read more »reply, thx 21:49, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Could we make a statement on WP:VPPR to that effect? See my concerns here: https://wikimania2014.wikimedia...
Click to read more »place is. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC) Moved from WP:VPPR I have been through Category:All articles with too few wikilinks and I think...
Click to read more »Thanks for this. CT55555 (talk) 14:56, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Moved from WP:VPPR Ping specific user groups, for example: @Administrators (pings a random administrator...
Click to read more »Richard001 (talk) 09:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC) I have brought it up at WP:VPPR, though it doesn't seem there will be any objection to such a bot's existence...
Click to read more »04:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC) This may be of interest for you as well: Wikipedia:VPPR#Being_able_to_edit_your_edit_summaries --Species8473 (talk) 06:00, 19 June...
Click to read more »sources (from RFCs or RSN discussions). This sounds like a discussion for WP:VPPR though and might need some preparation (I think I'll float the idea to see...
Click to read more »getting enough input on this is important. I have posted it at WP:CENT, WP:VPPR and WP:AN. Feel free to drop notes at other places. I have included this...
Click to read more »know/Gibraltar-related DYKs, or so I thought. If inadequate, can we centralize it in WP:VPPR? --George Ho (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Done. I, JethroBT drop...
Click to read more »Rjensen (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2013 (UTC) Per a conversation at WP:VPPR, Wikipedia:EducationProgram extension now exists. Feel free to improve/discuss...
Click to read more »the scope of CfD? Fram (talk) 09:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC) Note: now at WP:VPPR#Cleaning up NA-class categories. Fram (talk) 15:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »04:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Relist and notify at WT:WikiProject Template and WP:VPPR. More input is needed, even though I started to use {{subst:<anything>}}...
Click to read more »probably need to show some substantial consensus. I suggest a discussion at WP:VPPR. Prodego talk 04:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC) Yeah, that option was somewhat tongue...
Click to read more »Template:Further. Maiō T. proposed redirecting {{Category more}} to {{Further}} at VPPR, but the discussion was closed as it wasn't the appropriate venue. This was...
Click to read more »it must be pre-approved and possibly require community input through WP:VPPR/WikiProjects. A repetition of this is no good for anyone. --92.6.200.56 (talk)...
Click to read more »something? (If everyone here likes it, I'll make a new subsection and notify VPPR/VPT.) Interface administrators may edit a user script if it can be improved...
Click to read more »more support than just at this page to move this to disallow. I suggest WP:VPPR. — xaosflux Talk 12:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC) So, @Xaosflux:, I took your...
Click to read more »here shall close it as "no consensus to delete" as not substitute for WP:VPPR. --George Ho (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Done closed as Keep, but discussion...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC) James F. has started a discussion at WP:VPPR about offering VisualEditor to inexperienced editors. The "gradual deployment...
Click to read more »(UTC) Quick note: James F (the product manager) started a discussion over at VPPR about VisualEditor. Dinner's calling. I'll be back in a few hours. Whatamidoing...
Click to read more »04:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Relist and notify at WT:WikiProject Template and WP:VPPR. More input is needed, even though I started to use {{subst:<anything>}}...
Click to read more »the script. — SamX [talk · contribs] 04:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC) I'd say WP:VPPR or WP:VPT. Nardog (talk) 04:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC) Thanks, I've posted a link...
Click to read more »March 2017 (UTC) The best location for a discussion like that is probably WP:VPPR. VisualEditor can't "indent" replies, and it's relatively slow to load large...
Click to read more »Completed - (Initiated 1789 days ago on 25 September 2021) While this RfC hasn't run for 30 days yet, it may be time for a close. The last comment was...
Click to read more »--MASEM (t) 17:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC) I have raised a policy proposal at WP:VPPR#Allow images previously disallowed because of URAA copyright restoration...
Click to read more »I love interacting with people, so I usually hang out at WP:VPT and WP:VPPR. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page 11:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »This sounds like a proposal, or a policy-related question. Please see WP:VPPR for the former, and WP:VPP for the latter. You may also note that we have...
Click to read more »(UTC) Since this idea seems to be enjoying broad support, I will start a WP:VPPR discussion in early October, bearing mind the suggestions here. I support...
Click to read more »quality assessments added to it, following a unanimously supported RfC at VPPR, adding VIT assessments alongside shouldn't be difficult). —CX Zoom[he/him]...
Click to read more »Comment: I have left notifications of this RFC at WT:AT, WT:NCGN, WP:VPP and WP:VPPR. Refer to Special:Diff/1311378375, Special:Diff/1311378433, Special:Diff/1311378469...
Click to read more »03:00, 30 June 2026 (UTC) I definitely agree on this taking place at WP:VPPR. From this discussion, I just don't think it is possible that another placement...
Click to read more »be seen as a "precedent" that unprotection requests need to be debated at VPPR; the proper steps remain going first to the admin's talk page, then to WP:RFUP...
Click to read more »made any difference in practice. The most recent three edits they made to VPPR were in August 2025, January 2025, and July 2022. See also Wikipedia:You...
Click to read more »this. I personally jump straight to my watchlist articles, random article, VPPR, RFCs, and AFDs whenever I'm editing. I don't use the content portals as...
Click to read more »Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 22:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Could launch an RFC at WP:VPPR with question "What should we do with WP:RA?" and options A do nothing, B...
Click to read more »WP:PROPOSAL, notifications should be made to WT:AT, WT:NCGN, WP:VPP or WP:VPPR, and other relevant WikiProjects. Pinging @TarnishedPath so that those notifications...
Click to read more »WP:PROPOSAL, notifications should be made to WT:AT, WT:NCGN, WP:VPP or WP:VPPR and that this RFC should go for at least another 30 days after those notifications...
Click to read more »be seen as a "precedent" that unprotection requests need to be debated at VPPR; the proper steps remain going first to the admin's talk page, then to WP:RFUP...
Click to read more »provided guidance that I should notify WT:AT, WT:NCGN, and WP:VPP or WP:VPPR of the RFC and allow it to run another 30 days. Notifications were left at...
Click to read more »level-2 headings rather than level 3. That also implies I won't copy this to VPPr, but the RfCs would instead be on a separate page. I don't have a strong...
Click to read more »volume in The Lord of the Rings. For comparison, this page is presently 70K, VPPR is 263K, VPIL is 100K, and VPM is 20K. WP:SIZESPLIT suggests 30K to 50K,...
Click to read more »{{red}} template. isaacl (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC) Not an issue for VPPR. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC) The following discussion...
Click to read more »Chipmunkdavis, Keivan.f, and GoodDay: all participants in the previous VPPR discussion. Fram (talk) 09:56, 2 December 2025 (UTC) Support B. Fram (talk)...
Click to read more »might be proposed elsewhere? Or is this just an idea brainstorm page for VPPR? Awesome Aasim 19:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC) See the long history of Hikaru...
Click to read more »moved once, we might as well stick with it here. The downside to choosing VPPR over VPIL, of course, is that we can all weight in with "* Oppose" votes...
Click to read more »RFC on whether navigation pages should be allowed to exist. I guess at WP:VPPR, or at Wikipedia talk:Navigation pages but with notification to many other...
Click to read more »their time devising a plan, and then we oppose it once they bring it to WP:VPPR. I guess they have received enough feedback and can look through the archives...
Click to read more »proposal is extremely unlikely to succeed or even make it to the RfC-at-VPPR phase, if only because it's either too drastic a change (it isn't!) or because...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) Hmmmm – maybe that might be needed. If you end up taking it to VPPR, I'd probably back it. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 18:26, 12 September...
Click to read more »—Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:51, 3 November 2024 (UTC) See WP:VPPR#RfC: Extended confirmed pending changes (PCECP). Awesome Aasim 19:58, 5 November...
Click to read more »Hoping to get initial reactions here + new ideas before proposing it at WP:VPPr. The medical articles mostly suffered from vandalism, in terms of reason...
Click to read more »and what the right board is. I think the right board might be an RFC at WP:VPPR. The text of the RFC could be something like Due to credible threats of attempting...
Click to read more »you should publicise this on WP:VPT because I doubt people interested in VPPR care much about the code implementation of things as long as those things...
Click to read more »be seen as a "precedent" that unprotection requests need to be debated at VPPR; the proper steps remain going first to the admin's talk page, then to WP:RFUP...
Click to read more »—Cryptic 21:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC) Yuck. Also, this should probably be at VPPR or VPWMF. Cremastra (u — c) 21:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC) @EBlackorby-WMF But...
Click to read more »right place. Mast303 (talk) 18:50, 7 March 2025 (UTC) Hello @Mast303. WP:VPPR sounds like the place you're looking for, though I really recommend going...
Click to read more »Trialpears (talk) 12:28, 13 February 2026 (UTC) I did a spot check on VPPR's contents over the last ~6 months. At any given point in time, there are...
Click to read more »w.wiki/VPP leads to a user page on ar.wiki (a user with 52 edits) w.wiki/VPPR does not exist. w.wiki/VPWMF does not exist. w.wiki/VPM leads to Electronic...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:42, 21 June 2026 (UTC) @DuncanHill and Izno: Posting this at WP:VPPR now. BD2412 T 21:48, 21 June 2026 (UTC) There is a Harv error: duplicate...
Click to read more »13:46, 28 December 2025 (UTC) I'd like to use this at the top of WP:VPP, WP:VPPR, and WP:VPIL, once per page at the top, e.g.: {{#ifexpr:{{PAGESIZE:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|R}}...
Click to read more »MusikAnimal talk 15:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC) I have started a discussion at VPPR. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC) Related to Wikipedia:Miscellany...
Click to read more »| watch | logs) Append this to the proposals at the bottom of the list. VPPR is AC protected indefinitely. Remove GS/UKU This active sanction has been...
Click to read more »GS/Michael Jackson. 135.180.61.27 (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC) WP:VPPR is now the place for making these sorts of proposals (see WP:GS#Community...
Click to read more »mentorship if they have to re-add themself all the time. This may warrant a VPPR thread before proceeding, just floating some ideas here. —CX Zoom[he/him]...
Click to read more »came accross an RfC at Colleen Ballinger after seeing a post by Nemov at WP:VPPR, asking for more participation. The RfC is loctaed here: Talk:Colleen Ballinger#Infobox...
Click to read more »