Redirect to:
Traxion.gg 1 Ungeek 1 UOL Jogos (Brazil) 1, 2 Uppercut! 1 V Jump (Japan) 1 VGR 1 Video Game Rebirth 1 VideoGames & Computer Entertainment 1 Virtual Console...
Click to read more »the first game, of which 3 are WP:VGRS, with one of the other ones having a print edition so I argue is also a VGRS: "City Bus Simulator 2010 - Test,...
Click to read more »Rolling Stone, Indiegames (considered reliable per WP:VGRS), Hardcore Gamer (considered reliable per WP:VGRS). North America1000 08:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »- a quick skim through sources: GoNintendo is listed as unreliable at WP:VGRS Grinding Down is a wordpress blog, needs replaced I can't tell if "Payton...
Click to read more »creation. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Comment I found one WP:VGRS review: "Stumble Guys, la recensione del furbo clone di Fall Guys". Multiplayer...
Click to read more »rules sheet is a primary source. IGN is listed as generally reliable at WP:VGRS, but it also states that some content on the site should be avoided, as it...
Click to read more »characters and figures were not appropriate on every individual game article. WP:VGRS question – Discussion of new potential reliable sources for video games articles...
Click to read more »video game sources: "Monmusu Quest" – news · books · scholar · images – VGRS · WPVG Talk Find sources: "もんむす・くえすと" Google · Google Books · Google Scholar ·...
Click to read more »coverage is still insufficient to pass WP:GNG. KeenGamer is unreliable per WP:VGRS, and Medium is red-carded unreliable on WP:RSP as a blog-hosting service...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I see exactly two articles on the game in WP:VGRS (that's Destructoid and NintendoLife). This topic does not presently display...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:VGRS search turns up exactly four sources, and those seem to be more about tech...
Click to read more »wccftech (marked as unreliable at VGRS), Zelda Informer (also marked as unreliable at VGRS), Game Kudos (not at VGRS, which appears to be a sign of definite...
Click to read more »(UTC) If we choose to have articles on every game covered/reviewed at WP:VGRS, that's pathetic.Winged Blades Godric 04:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC) Wait, what...
Click to read more »or otherwise not obviously reliable (according to WP:VGRS). The only reference from the VGRS CSE (search) that isn't a false positive is this article...
Click to read more »then there's the incidental coverage at [4] and the passing mentions in a VGRS search. Redirect Vici Gaming to The International (Dota 2). They are best...
Click to read more »during my lunch break. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 16:30, 28 October 2016 (UTC) The VGRS search finds mentions by commenters but not even a passing mention by a website...
Click to read more »00:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Delete I'm finding nothing in either news or WP:VGRS searches. TimothyJosephWood 13:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Delete Unless someone...
Click to read more »TWL) Not sure this hits GNG. None of the sources cited are listed at WP:VGRS, which is never a good sign, and I didn't find anything better on a search...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Delete - Nearly nothing on news or WP:VGRS searches. TimothyJosephWood 18:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »There's also a difference between "not listed at WP:VGRS" and "source is not reliable". WP:VGRS is not intended to be exhaustive, and sometimes common...
Click to read more »an outside contributor (a noted concern at VGRS). Breezy Scroll Not discussed anywhere in WP:RSP or WP:VGRS, list of team members is entirely informal...
Click to read more »significant probably. I don't think it's an RS, but it's listed as so in WP:VGRS, so it's hence a likely RS that is probably SIGCOV. In this case, we have...
Click to read more »Non-notable mobile app. Article written like it's an ad. Modojo is not on WP:VGRS, and the Common Sense Media review is for a totally different game (just...
Click to read more »per WP:VGRS... Liquipedia is WP:UGC, Dexerto should rarely be used for BLPs (WP:DEXERTO), HLTV and GINX are not a reliable source per WP:VGRS, BLAST is...
Click to read more »merged to GameMaker: Studio, which between the two (given the returns in the VGRS search engine) should definitely be notable enough (if that was not immediately...
Click to read more »junk. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC). Coverage is weak in the VGRS custom search. --Izno (talk) 20:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC) Delete - No indication...
Click to read more »Rock, Paper, Shotgun, The Escapist, PC Gamer, and Android Central, all WP:VGRS. Skyshiftertalk 19:40, 22 August 2026 (UTC) Keep the unprose-ified reception...
Click to read more »w:sv:Gornjak (bandyklubb) (diff !top) - Link: cs633317.vk.me/v633317873/105df/kVgrL_wFmrs.jpg (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2016-02-25 13:15:43 (UTC): w:sv:User:2...
Click to read more »is not ready for a separate article given the dearth of sources in the WP:VGRS search [1]. --Izno (talk) 03:13, 1 June 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Appears not to be notable per the VGRS search. Delete. --Izno (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Delete - Checked...
Click to read more »unclear notability. The third-party sources cited are [1] (not listed on WP:VGRS) and [2] (a porn news website). I can't read most other sources, but at a...
Click to read more »11:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC) [1], [2], [3], [4] are all I can find that are WP:VGRS. --Izno (talk) 11:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. North America1000 20:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Delete. The VGRS search turns up... not a lot. --Izno (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. North America1000 15:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Nothing in WP:VGRS. --Izno (talk) 16:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Delete - Lack of significant coverage...
Click to read more »announcement, Polygon announcement, and I didn't see anything else in the WP:VGRS search. Redirect to the 2014 film, maybe? Game exists, and the title is not...
Click to read more »CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Game lacks any coverage in WP:VGRS as in this search. Delete. --Izno (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »sources: "No Gravity" -"The Plague of Mind" – news · books · scholar · images – VGRS · WPVG Talk Comment - It seems the sequel appears more often in sources than...
Click to read more »22:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC) PC Gamer is considered a reliable source at WP:VGRS--Prisencolin (talk) 22:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Keep Significant WP:RS coverage...
Click to read more »on WP:VGRS and WP:RS/PS. In particular: Dexerto is noted as a "tabloid publication" on VGRS TheGamer is noted as a "situational source" on VGRS (see:...
Click to read more »13:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC) TechSpot is in the "Inconclusive" section of VGRS, not the "Unreliable" section. While yeah I'm not happy with the sources...
Click to read more »are 4 full-length, significant, independent, and reliable reviews (per WP:VGRS they are all listed in the RS section). Only 2+ refs is needed to pass WP:NPRODUCT...
Click to read more »a handful of hits at itmedia.co.jp, which is considered reliable per WP:VGRS. SharkD Talk 08:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC) Keep per DGG, many prominent...
Click to read more »Business Insider, so it does not meet the FA "high-quality RS" standard. WP:VGRS lists Softonic as inconclusive on being an RS, so it does not meet the FA...
Click to read more »its release on Steam). All I can pick out from the sources listed in WP:VGRS are a bunch of announcements: Destructoid: Steam, Greenlight; Hardcoregamer:...
Click to read more »Slide to Play, AppSpy and Common Sense Media which are all reliable in WP:VGRS give Kitchen Carnage a GNG pass. There are also a few more reviews of unrated/situational...
Click to read more »obviously, but it is there. --MASEM (t) 01:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC) Also a keep: WP:VGRS search pops up at least a dozen announcement articles, an interview, and...
Click to read more »12:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Critical Hit is explicitly listed as unreliable at VGRS. SACoronavirus doesn't have an obvious indicator of editorial oversight....
Click to read more »high-quality RS? While comicbook.com is listed as "other reliable" at WP:VGRS, the linked discussion actually calls that source to be on the fringe of...
Click to read more »--Kizor 22:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC) @Kizor Is there a webcomic equivalent of WP:VGRS? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »looks user-generated. This apparently contains some reliable content per WP:VGRS, but the majority of the content on that page is clearly marked as user-generated...
Click to read more »sources used in this one are marked as either unreliable or inconclusive at WP:VGRS, including some used heavily. Needs some significant work to improve the...
Click to read more »February 2023 (UTC) Weak Delete The Hardcore Gaming source is SIGCOV and VGRS, but other than that all I can find is a Japanese review of unknown reliability...
Click to read more »16:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Delete. Cannot prove notability via Google or VGRS search for this recent game. No more than passing mentions as a launch title...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep The 2nd & 3rd sources presented by nominator are reviews from VGRS, here is a third one which is enough for WP:GNG Jumpytoo Talk 06:19, 10 November...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I see only a handful of WP:VGRS: two short reviews from PCGamer and IndieGames, based only on the early access...
Click to read more »of which are not independent of the subject), and HLTV (unreliable per WP:VGRS). A WP:BEFORE search does not find anything of substance either. – Pbrks (t·c)...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff - DELETED) - Link: www.unwomencanada.org/vgr/ (R/Xmeta/L) 1970-01-01 00:00:00 (UTC): q:en:User:KristyHawley (t - c; 1)...
Click to read more »GNG meet? I think so. Gamezebo and RPG Fan have been refed four times. Per VGRS, they are RS per consensus: for Gamezebo, for RPG Fan. So there are four...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC) CinemaBlend has been discussed at RSN and VGRS and found to be generally unreliable. But even if it wasn't, the source is...
Click to read more »more would push it over the line. Rupples (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC) WP:VGRS considers SVG unreliable, and Game Rant unfit for establishing notability...
Click to read more »Broadcaster Influence" by The Esports Observer, which is listed reliable at WP:VGRS. Furthermore, this by Dot Esports could potentially also count as SIGCOV...
Click to read more »currently discussing damaging claims sourced to Dexerto (unreliable per WP:VGRS), Twitter, and Reddit. YIKES. (Note that I just removed it, still doesn't...
Click to read more »but on the other Kotaku and Polygon are clearly reliable sources per WP:VGRS. Sandstein 20:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »possibly count towards notability. The following are all reliable per WP:VGRS: Esports Insider, Venture Beat, and PCGamesN. Also, Esports Advocate is probably...
Click to read more »opposite is true. Almost all statements in the article are attributed to WP:VGRS-compliant sources, which are also not "opinion pieces". For instance, the...
Click to read more »(seemingly) fans, which is not reliable. Please replace with a reliable source. WP:VGRS and WP:RSP is a guide to filtering sources. GeraldWL 06:30, 17 February 2021...
Click to read more »in this specific RPGish or technical meaning: many passing mentions in WP:VGRS, e.g. usage by devs talking about game design [1][2] and in patch notes [3]...
Click to read more »sources are well-established, reputable Australian media outlets; see WP:VGRS for Polygon's reliability. Bridget (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2026 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »I'd classify them as fanzine, but shrug, potato, potato. Considering WP:VGRS, I think they are not worse from many other sources out there. All that said...
Click to read more »staff and has been established to be reliable. As for the listing on WP:VGRS#Inconclusive discussions, I notice that section also lists Behind the Voice...
Click to read more »that source may come from a user, which would render it unreliable per WP:VGRS. This is also about the upcoming game. The 1991 version, which this article...
Click to read more »launches would get a dull writer enough WP notability, while posts about vgr's writing like these - [1], [2] - would (correctly per WP:RS) be disputed...
Click to read more »is a different question. It's also worth noting that WP:RSP links to WP:VGRS#Valnet, which says In general, these sites should not be used to demonstrate...
Click to read more »not pass for reliable sources on WP whether or not they pass through the VGRS talk page. czar 04:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC) Keep Many mentions even using...
Click to read more »(talk - contribs) to ru:Гродно (diff). Links: www.grodno.by/ www.aor.by/ vgr.by. 2008-02-07 10:26:41: User en:91.192.151.1 (talk - contribs) to en:Flash...
Click to read more »Montreal (talk) 20:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC) This article lacks WP:RS and the WP:VGRS custom search engine gets us no further regarding meeting the criteria established...
Click to read more »take a stab at improving this using sources above, assuming they meet WP:VGRS. Note that at current this is a stub that uses mostly unreliabe sources and...
Click to read more »non-noteworthy) from Dot Esports, which has been recently been discussed at WP:VGRS, and the consensus is that it is reliable: Wunder is the player to watch...
Click to read more »Game-Over has no hallmarks of editorial credibility. And I agree with the VGRS conversation that questioned GamersHell's reliability in the first place...
Click to read more »source (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ] T:VGR → Template:Video game reviews (links to redirect • history •...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:VG/RWP:VG/R WP:VGWP:VG WP:VG/REQWP:VG/REQ This page is a list of video game-related topics for which editors have requested articles be created...
Click to read more »Beeble (Dghutt) Category:Captain Tsubasa video games (Nohansen) Template:Cat vgr (SharkD) Cauldron HQ (Elven6) CFL Football '99 (SD3107E) Characters of Crash...
Click to read more »(Dragoljub Kojadinovic) Drake & Josh (video game) (Chewanater) Template:Dts vgr (SharkD) Duckman: The Graphic Adventures of a Private Dick (Dwanyewest) Duke...
Click to read more »ago, no cited source (or the ones listed at MobyGames) seems to be at WP:VGRS. I am afraid this game is not notable. The single award (" The game placed...
Click to read more »Destructoid again. In this case it's being used to support a fact, which VGRS says is okay if the author can be established as reliable. So: how is Jordan...
Click to read more »Makholm 20:12, 26 May 2006 (UTC) So just because TwoP is more famous, the VGR article is less worthy? Nice priorities there, guys. Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »not blogs and fansites; for a list of reliable video game sources, see WP:VGRS); to meet the "general notability guideline", a subject needs to have in-depth...
Click to read more »listed as inconclusive at VGRS, so it's not gonna be high-quality RS Destructoid is listed as situational by author at VGRS, and so that means Jim Sterling...
Click to read more »think it's the strongest case, but between the four that I listed (from VGRS search), and Linux Dev Center, Switched, and Linux.com, shouldn't we be good...
Click to read more »There are sources posted on the talk page, WP:CSM and Gamezebo which is WP:VGRS. That being said... the second line is copied from the Pocket Gamer source...
Click to read more »don't seem to be reliable; thexboxhub.com is listed as unreliable on WP:VGRS, gamecritix.com looks AI-generated, gaming.net is less obviously unreliable...
Click to read more »article is from their esports section, which is considered reliable per WP:VGRS. I'm unsure what you are considering "unreliable." Why are we considering...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:12, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Yes, GameSpy is reliable according to WP:VGRS. --Izno (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2017 (UTC) As is Game.EXE. I've added a link...
Click to read more »request. This is an old video game and some old sources could be checked at WP:VGRS. wumbolo ^^^ 21:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »01:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Gameranx has been discussed several times at WT:VGRS and it has always been found to be unreliable because it lacks all of the...
Click to read more »stats) T:UAAT:UAA → Template:UAA (links to redirect • history • stats) T:VGR → Template:Video game reviews (links to redirect • history • stats) T:WPAF...
Click to read more »Rock, Paper, Shotgun, The Escapist, PC Gamer, and Android Central, all WP:VGRS. Skyshiftertalk 19:40, 22 August 2026 (UTC) Keep the unprose-ified reception...
Click to read more »nominations). Its name clashes with both Template:Vgr (a redirect with two dozen uses) and, less relevantly, WP:VGR (both of which, however, are more recently...
Click to read more »previous discussion on, and Gaming Target where one person said in 2009 on WP:VGRS was unreliable. The UK Anime review is OK as its an Andy Hanley review per...
Click to read more »if you'd prefer. You can find them and others with a simple search of the VGRS custom Google search linked from the page. You're welcome to deride this...
Click to read more »unfamiliar with this source - is it a high-quality RS? This isn't on WP:VGRS, which tends to make me think this is a fairly obscure source DemiVision...
Click to read more »code=VAL&status=0, (120, 58, 58, 0) www.swire.com.sg/vessel_detail.aspx?code=VGR&status=0, (120, 58, 58, 0) www.swire.com.sg/vessel_detail.aspx?code=VUL&status=0...
Click to read more »necessary, I found this from Kotaku, which is considered reliable by WP:VGRS. Link20XX (talk) 02:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC) FAC uses a higher bar than as...
Click to read more »history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Module:Find sources/links/vgrs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Module:Find sources/links/vgtalk (talk ·...
Click to read more »rationale applies. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC) Delete Per Vgr discussion, per nom, per Hellknowz. -- ferret (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »towards displaying notability. HLTV is not considered a reliable source per WP:VGRS Neox Games is still an interview, so WP:PRIMARY CSGO is not independent Blix...
Click to read more »TWL) Not sure this hits GNG. None of the sources cited are listed at WP:VGRS, which is never a good sign, and I didn't find anything better on a search...
Click to read more »America1000 09:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC) There are dozens of mentions in the VGRS search, and the Guinness Book of World Records citation is interesting. This...
Click to read more »are from before then) HeyUGuys Sources that are listed as unreliable at VGRS and need replaced Neoseeker Nintendo Everything Hog Farm Bacon 04:19, 4 January...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 506#Dark Art WP:RSN/Archive 262#Dexerto WT:VGRS/Archive 25#Dexerto (part 2 - electric boogaloo) WP:RSN/Archive 266#RfC: Dexerto...
Click to read more »other list-based articles are not by Game Rant and by sources deemed RS by VGRS. Any sources of questionable reliability are used to supplement the article...
Click to read more »(UTC) LewdGamer is not a reliable source. Copying my comments from your WT:VGRS thread here: The writers are pseudonymous with no indication of a background...
Click to read more »(Dragoljub Kojadinovic) Drake & Josh (video game) (Chewanater) Template:Dts vgr (SharkD) Duckman: The Graphic Adventures of a Private Dick (Dwanyewest) Duke...
Click to read more »0CXi7HcQ0kNeYeYK-t0IomXQdgnSN4MwpSrlLg_1wo22HkKjT7IewOu41kiacQuXzlLsVG9RfVgrWgR4TxOpPX6TlJnirJ3wuBNI_1iyXgkZyzpvq9qSU9w-r9sYPo2bQIxSg6Kir9-3NMUeT5dN9...
Click to read more »Wolfquack (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC) It's listed as reliable at WP:VGRS. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC) @Hemiauchenia Thanks for...
Click to read more »assessing WP:Due weight. It's also worth noting that WP:RSP links to WP:VGRS#Valnet, which says In general, these sites should not be used to demonstrate...
Click to read more »appears to be sufficiently obscure that VGRS doesn't even cover it, which isn't a great sign, since in my experience VGRS is pretty good. The book is from PediaPress...
Click to read more »paragraph before it?) What makes Shoryuken, Fanbyte, Esports.gg, Kakuchopurei, VGR high-quality reliable sources? (Shoryuken in particular is listed as unreliable...
Click to read more »T:WPTECH → Template:WikiProject Georgia Tech (links to redirect) (stats) T:VGR → Template:VG reviews (links to redirect) (stats) Cross-namespace redirect;...
Click to read more »seem to be missing the second page. Escapist is listed as situational at WP:VGRS, although this may be due to a time frame when they exercised little oversight...
Click to read more »VFZ VGA VGB VGC VGD VGE VGF VGG VGH VGI VGJ VGK VGL VGM VGN VGO VGP VGQ VGR VGS VGT VGU VGV VGW VGX VGY VGZ VHA VHB VHC VHD VHE VHF VHG VHH VHI VHJ VHK...
Click to read more »esports to extent nowadays, and the most reliable ones can be found at WP:VGRS--Prisencolin (talk) 19:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC) User:Blueboar, I would imagine...
Click to read more »NegativeMP1 16:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC) @Celtoi I recommend viewing WP:VGRS to see which sources are considered reliable for video game articles. Thanks...
Click to read more »creation. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Comment I found one WP:VGRS review: "Stumble Guys, la recensione del furbo clone di Fall Guys". Multiplayer...
Click to read more »(UTC) If we choose to have articles on every game covered/reviewed at WP:VGRS, that's pathetic.Winged Blades Godric 04:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC) Wait, what...
Click to read more »I'll look at the new ones. Still qualifying that I am relying heavily on WP:VGRS. What makes https://mantan-web.jp a reliable source? Has Siliconera improved...
Click to read more »vfz vga vgb vgc vgd vge vgf vgg vgh vgi vgj vgk vgl vgm vgn vgo vgp vgq vgr vgs vgt vgu vgv vgw vgx vgy vgz vha vhb vhc vhd vhe vhf vhg vhh vhi vhj vhk...
Click to read more »Since then, the subject has received far more significant coverage from WP:VGRS. SSTflyer 14:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC) Keep and comment We're talking about...
Click to read more »non-noteworthy) from Dot Esports, which has been recently been discussed at WP:VGRS, and the consensus is that it is reliable: Wunder is the player to watch...
Click to read more »video game sources: "Monmusu Quest" – news · books · scholar · images – VGRS · WPVG Talk Find sources: "もんむす・くえすと" Google · Google Books · Google Scholar ·...
Click to read more »htm (166, 1452, 1, -3) europeandcis.undp.org/uploads/public/file/rbec_web/vgr/chapter1.1.pdf (166, 63, 1, 1) edition.cnn.com/2004/world/europe/04/14/eu...
Click to read more »to such sources in the AfD discussion. I searched for sources on the WP:VGRS search engine and Google News, and the most in-depth coverage I could find...
Click to read more »author Done. What makes New Gamer Network high-quality RS? Not listed at WP:VGRS, and the credentials listed in their About section are all about playing...
Click to read more »a handful of hits at itmedia.co.jp, which is considered reliable per WP:VGRS. SharkD Talk 08:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC) Keep per DGG, many prominent...
Click to read more »There's also a difference between "not listed at WP:VGRS" and "source is not reliable". WP:VGRS is not intended to be exhaustive, and sometimes common...
Click to read more »significant probably. I don't think it's an RS, but it's listed as so in WP:VGRS, so it's hence a likely RS that is probably SIGCOV. In this case, we have...
Click to read more »T:HAT) — 12 pageviews T:R_from→Template:R template index — 3 pageviews T:VGR→Template:Video game reviews — 12 pageviews T:WPAF→Template:WP Artemis Fowl...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC) CinemaBlend has been discussed at RSN and VGRS and found to be generally unreliable. But even if it wasn't, the source is...
Click to read more »rules sheet is a primary source. IGN is listed as generally reliable at WP:VGRS, but it also states that some content on the site should be avoided, as it...
Click to read more »during my lunch break. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 16:30, 28 October 2016 (UTC) The VGRS search finds mentions by commenters but not even a passing mention by a website...
Click to read more »request. This is an old video game and some old sources could be checked at WP:VGRS. wumbolo ^^^ 21:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »roma/ (108, 2448, 1, 1) europeandcis.undp.org/uploads/public/file/rbec_web/vgr/chapter1.1.pdf (108, 18, 1, 1) www.perepis2002.ru/ct/html/tom_04_01.htm (108...
Click to read more »I'm assuming we are discussing the articles that @Why? I Ask: listed. The VGR source is about Korb, and doesn't mention a song in specific. Same goes for...
Click to read more »I'd classify them as fanzine, but shrug, potato, potato. Considering WP:VGRS, I think they are not worse from many other sources out there. All that said...
Click to read more »(UTC) LewdGamer is not a reliable source. Copying my comments from your WT:VGRS thread here: The writers are pseudonymous with no indication of a background...
Click to read more »that source may come from a user, which would render it unreliable per WP:VGRS. This is also about the upcoming game. The 1991 version, which this article...
Click to read more »or otherwise not obviously reliable (according to WP:VGRS). The only reference from the VGRS CSE (search) that isn't a false positive is this article...
Click to read more »merged to GameMaker: Studio, which between the two (given the returns in the VGRS search engine) should definitely be notable enough (if that was not immediately...
Click to read more »criptions++%2B+%22turkey+mountain%22&source=bl&ots=s9kw_d7jmk&sig=3FKXy0nVgrM6dbRI3Y_-GFbAvGs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PIceUPqIOqGe0QXV-ICgDQ&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBA Needs...
Click to read more »then there's the incidental coverage at [38] and the passing mentions in a VGRS search. Redirect Vici Gaming to The International (Dota 2). They are best...
Click to read more »Montreal (talk) 20:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC) This article lacks WP:RS and the WP:VGRS custom search engine gets us no further regarding meeting the criteria established...
Click to read more »announcement, Polygon announcement, and I didn't see anything else in the WP:VGRS search. Redirect to the 2014 film, maybe? Game exists, and the title is not...
Click to read more »11:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC) [1], [2], [3], [4] are all I can find that are WP:VGRS. --Izno (talk) 11:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »not pass for reliable sources on WP whether or not they pass through the VGRS talk page. czar 04:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC) Keep Many mentions even using...
Click to read more »Rolling Stone, Indiegames (considered reliable per WP:VGRS), Hardcore Gamer (considered reliable per WP:VGRS). North America1000 08:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »--Kizor 22:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC) @Kizor Is there a webcomic equivalent of WP:VGRS? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »00:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Delete I'm finding nothing in either news or WP:VGRS searches. TimothyJosephWood 13:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Delete Unless someone...
Click to read more »sources: "No Gravity" -"The Plague of Mind" – news · books · scholar · images – VGRS · WPVG Talk Comment - It seems the sequel appears more often in sources than...
Click to read more »but on the other Kotaku and Polygon are clearly reliable sources per WP:VGRS. Sandstein 20:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC) Trap Adventure 2 (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »Broadcaster Influence" by The Esports Observer, which is listed reliable at WP:VGRS. Furthermore, this by Dot Esports could potentially also count as SIGCOV...
Click to read more »America1000 09:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC) There are dozens of mentions in the VGRS search, and the Guinness Book of World Records citation is interesting. This...
Click to read more »unclear notability. The third-party sources cited are [61] (not listed on WP:VGRS) and [62] (a porn news website). I can't read most other sources, but at...
Click to read more »been determined to be a reliable source for video game articles as per WP:VGRS. It is only one of the dozens of other reliable sources such as Verge, Kotaku...
Click to read more »was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC) Template:Cat vgr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) No articles use this and...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:VGRS search turns up exactly four sources, and those seem to be more about tech...
Click to read more »Riker count? He was in TNG and VGR (thanks to Q) and his clone was in DS9. Adam Bishop 16:17, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC) What is VGR? I don't know of any characters...
Click to read more »looks user-generated. This apparently contains some reliable content per WP:VGRS, but the majority of the content on that page is clearly marked as user-generated...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. North America1000 20:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Delete. The VGRS search turns up... not a lot. --Izno (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Delete - Nearly nothing on news or WP:VGRS searches. TimothyJosephWood 18:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. North America1000 15:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Nothing in WP:VGRS. --Izno (talk) 16:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Delete - Lack of significant coverage...
Click to read more »take a stab at improving this using sources above, assuming they meet WP:VGRS. Note that at current this is a stub that uses mostly unreliabe sources and...
Click to read more »its release on Steam). All I can pick out from the sources listed in WP:VGRS are a bunch of announcements: Destructoid: Steam, Greenlight; Hardcoregamer:...
Click to read more »currently discussing damaging claims sourced to Dexerto (unreliable per WP:VGRS), Twitter, and Reddit. YIKES. (Note that I just removed it, still doesn't...
Click to read more »01:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Gameranx has been discussed several times at WT:VGRS and it has always been found to be unreliable because it lacks all of the...
Click to read more »GNG meet? I think so. Gamezebo and RPG Fan have been refed four times. Per VGRS, they are RS per consensus: for Gamezebo, for RPG Fan. So there are four...
Click to read more »CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Appears not to be notable per the VGRS search. Delete. --Izno (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Delete - Checked...
Click to read more »not blogs and fansites; for a list of reliable video game sources, see WP:VGRS); to meet the "general notability guideline", a subject needs to have in-depth...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I see exactly two articles on the game in WP:VGRS (that's Destructoid and NintendoLife). This topic does not presently display...
Click to read more »junk. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC). Coverage is weak in the VGRS custom search. --Izno (talk) 20:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC) Delete - No indication...
Click to read more »obviously, but it is there. --MASEM (t) 01:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC) Also a keep: WP:VGRS search pops up at least a dozen announcement articles, an interview, and...
Click to read more »been determined to be a reliable source for video game articles as per WP:VGRS. It is only one of the dozens of other reliable sources such as Verge, Kotaku...
Click to read more »are 4 full-length, significant, independent, and reliable reviews (per WP:VGRS they are all listed in the RS section). Only 2+ refs is needed to pass WP:NPRODUCT...
Click to read more »22:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC) PC Gamer is considered a reliable source at WP:VGRS--Prisencolin (talk) 22:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Keep Significant WP:RS coverage...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:12, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Yes, GameSpy is reliable according to WP:VGRS. --Izno (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2017 (UTC) As is Game.EXE. I've added a link...
Click to read more »to such sources in the AfD discussion. I searched for sources on the WP:VGRS search engine and Google News, and the most in-depth coverage I could find...
Click to read more »13:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC) TechSpot is in the "Inconclusive" section of VGRS, not the "Unreliable" section. While yeah I'm not happy with the sources...
Click to read more »Game-Over has no hallmarks of editorial credibility. And I agree with the VGRS conversation that questioned GamersHell's reliability in the first place...
Click to read more »12:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Critical Hit is explicitly listed as unreliable at VGRS. SACoronavirus doesn't have an obvious indicator of editorial oversight....
Click to read more »if you'd prefer. You can find them and others with a simple search of the VGRS custom Google search linked from the page. You're welcome to deride this...
Click to read more »staff and has been established to be reliable. As for the listing on WP:VGRS#Inconclusive discussions, I notice that section also lists Behind the Voice...
Click to read more »launches would get a dull writer enough WP notability, while posts about vgr's writing like these - [13], [14] - would (correctly per WP:RS) be disputed...
Click to read more »Slide to Play, AppSpy and Common Sense Media which are all reliable in WP:VGRS give Kitchen Carnage a GNG pass. There are also a few more reviews of unrated/situational...
Click to read more »is not ready for a separate article given the dearth of sources in the WP:VGRS search [10]. --Izno (talk) 03:13, 1 June 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »opposite is true. Almost all statements in the article are attributed to WP:VGRS-compliant sources, which are also not "opinion pieces". For instance, the...
Click to read more »reliable source is the Nintendo Life article, which is reputable per WP:VGRS. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Berman (4th nomination), which...
Click to read more »think it's the strongest case, but between the four that I listed (from VGRS search), and Linux Dev Center, Switched, and Linux.com, shouldn't we be good...
Click to read more »CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Game lacks any coverage in WP:VGRS as in this search. Delete. --Izno (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »VickKiang (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC) If they're listed as an RS at WP:VGRS, they should be usable for board game articles as well. Mlb96 (talk) 22:54...
Click to read more »Non-notable mobile app. Article written like it's an ad. Modojo is not on WP:VGRS, and the Common Sense Media review is for a totally different game (just...
Click to read more »VFZ VGA VGB VGC VGD VGE VGF VGG VGH VGI VGJ VGK VGL VGM VGN VGO VGP VGQ VGR VGS VGT VGU VGV VGW VGX VGY VGZ VHA VHB VHC VHD VHE VHF VHG VHH VHI VHJ VHK...
Click to read more »TigraanClick here to contact me 17:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC) Yeah... WP:VGRS custom search don't look hopeful. But no. There is no such template, because...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I see only a handful of WP:VGRS: two short reviews from PCGamer and IndieGames, based only on the early access...
Click to read more »criptions++%2B+%22turkey+mountain%22&source=bl&ots=s9kw_d7jmk&sig=3FKXy0nVgrM6dbRI3Y_-GFbAvGs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PIceUPqIOqGe0QXV-ICgDQ&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBA Needs...
Click to read more »Since then, the subject has received far more significant coverage from WP:VGRS. SSTflyer 14:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC) Keep and comment We're talking about...
Click to read more »16:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Delete. Cannot prove notability via Google or VGRS search for this recent game. No more than passing mentions as a launch title...
Click to read more »wccftech (marked as unreliable at VGRS), Zelda Informer (also marked as unreliable at VGRS), Game Kudos (not at VGRS, which appears to be a sign of definite...
Click to read more »author Done. What makes New Gamer Network high-quality RS? Not listed at WP:VGRS, and the credentials listed in their About section are all about playing...
Click to read more »August 2015 (UTC) Responded at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#WP:VGRS_question. Easier to keep discussion in one place. – czar 16:04, 31 August...
Click to read more »see!—S Marshall T/C 11:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC) This was discussed at WP:VGRS and Talk:League of Legends Pro League.--Prisencolin (talk) 19:51, 29 August...
Click to read more »the first game, of which 3 are WP:VGRS, with one of the other ones having a print edition so I argue is also a VGRS: "City Bus Simulator 2010 - Test,...
Click to read more »the sources here, neither Gaming Respawn nor Player One are listed at WP:VGRS, Supertext is the blog of a commerical copywriting company, and the University...
Click to read more »page. Done: Clarified the link. Lazman321 (talk) 01:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC) WP:VGRS says that Kotaku is reliable post-2010. There is a single 2010 cite to Kotaku...
Click to read more »result; same for 'WPAF', 'WPProp', 'WP Proposals' and 'R from'. Searching for 'VGR', the template redirect appears as the fourth result. A search for 'P2' turns...
Click to read more »example AnandTech (RSN discussion) or Bit-Tech (listed as reliable on WP:VGRS) for computer hardware) but I contend it's generally usable for its reviews...
Click to read more »normally consider this as unreliable but given that another participant in the VGRS discussion found some WP:USEBYOTHERS there might be more in Italian, so I'm...
Click to read more »redirect to Minecraft. 86.150.18.203 (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Any WP:VGRS discussing this game in depth? The deletion was a few months ago so it's...
Click to read more »(Vemgo-Mabas), ven (Venda), veo (Ventureño), vep (Veps), ver (Mom Jango), vgr (Vaghri), vgt (Flemish Sign, Vlaamse Gebarentaal), vic (Virgin Islands Creole...
Click to read more »Beetstra T C 13:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Sources listed as reliable on WP:VGRS and WP:A/S should be added as well. I'm currently compiling a list of potential...
Click to read more »consoles TfDed by Masem was closed; discussion 12 Oct 2011 – Template:Cat vgr TfDed by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars was closed; discussion 19 Nov 2011 –...
Click to read more »appears to be sufficiently obscure that VGRS doesn't even cover it, which isn't a great sign, since in my experience VGRS is pretty good. The book is from PediaPress...
Click to read more »Farm Talk 16:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC) GamersHell is listed as unreliable at WP:VGRS Replaced Be consistent with formatting. For instance, US Gamer vs USgamer...
Click to read more »|title= (help) Note – There is currently a discussion on this topic at WT:VGRS#Dexerto (part 2 - electric boogaloo). — Pbrks (talk) 15:04, 3 September 2021...
Click to read more »coming pleas,! i hope that i a answer from you back My Number is[removed] Vgr Michael Baumann —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.249.173.98 (talk)...
Click to read more »Where does #49 speak of a satellite studio? Usual caveat about relying on WP:VGRS. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC) Hi @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Joe...
Click to read more »November 2024 (UTC) Going to throw the major caveat that I am relying on WP:VGRS rather heavily here. I see that TheGamer is flagged as reliable only after...
Click to read more »redirect to Minecraft. 86.150.18.203 (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Any WP:VGRS discussing this game in depth? The deletion was a few months ago so it's...
Click to read more »0BU3vZANMNJwhCM8y5pitMt-7HN4Jb93O195udagbYRanZBgCBkQFmyIAP-N6tCXUlTqe8LVqVgrFbIlvPaV8vyeY3ItNWxpkNE64rDveWdDa3zVvuiWw_1ZiY2zs609EESY4NZ_1DiAzd-uYtzCm...
Click to read more »Veddah [ved], Mabas [vem], Venda [ven], Veps [vep], Mom Jango [ver], Vaghri [vgr], Lesser Antillean Creole English [vib], Vidunda [vid], Vietnamese [vie]...
Click to read more »reliable source for what WB said and what his followers believe. 2. The VGR/WBEA site is controlled by Billy-Paul & Joseph Branham who Weaver & Harrell...
Click to read more »Veddah [ved], Mabas [vem], Venda [ven], Veps [vep], Mom Jango [ver], Vaghri [vgr], Lesser Antillean Creole English [vib], Vidunda [vid], Vietnamese [vie]...
Click to read more »[eze] Vaagri Booli [vaa], Vafsi [vaf], Vaghat-Ya-Bijim-Legeri [bij], Vaghri [vgr], Vaghua [tva], Vagla [vag], Vai [vai], Vaiphei [vap], Vale [vae], Valencian...
Click to read more »Golden Record - Cover (NASA -> PD)) 15:19 Nov 5, 2002 Eloquence uploaded "VgrCover.jpg" (Explanation of the Voyager Golden Record Cover by NASA -> PD)...
Click to read more »Everything else seems reliable but note that I have to rely extensively on WP:VGRS since I don't know most of these sauces. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:30, 22 July...
Click to read more »other list-based articles are not by Game Rant and by sources deemed RS by VGRS. Any sources of questionable reliability are used to supplement the article...
Click to read more »assesment table, including a misapplication of the Kotaku source. Again, the VGRS says News posts from Kotaku between 2010 and 2022 are considered reliable...
Click to read more »high-quality RS? While comicbook.com is listed as "other reliable" at WP:VGRS, the linked discussion actually calls that source to be on the fringe of...
Click to read more »listed as inconclusive at VGRS, so it's not gonna be high-quality RS Destructoid is listed as situational by author at VGRS, and so that means Jim Sterling...
Click to read more »- I'm not a huge fan of citing a Valnet publication (TheGamer) for FAC. VGRS notes that it's "generally reliable" for "news posts and original content"...
Click to read more »Vaal-Orange vafs1240 [vaf] Vafsi vagh1247 [bij] Vaghat-Ya-Bijim-Legeri vagh1246 [vgr] Vaghri vagh1249 [tva] Vaghua vagl1239 [vag] Vagla vaii1241 [vai] Vai vaip1239...
Click to read more »must qualify my review with the observation that I'll heavily rely on WP:VGRS for lack of subject-matter knowledge. It seems like most sources are reliable...
Click to read more »result; same for 'WPAF', 'WPProp', 'WP Proposals' and 'R from'. Searching for 'VGR', the template redirect appears as the fourth result. A search for 'P2' turns...
Click to read more »@Novem Linguae, the maintainer of Cite Highlighter. I am active at the WT:VGRS board, where I both partake in discussions and also post about sources. For...
Click to read more »Makholm 20:12, 26 May 2006 (UTC) So just because TwoP is more famous, the VGR article is less worthy? Nice priorities there, guys. Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »VFZ VGA VGB VGC VGD VGE VGF VGG VGH VGI VGJ VGK VGL VGM VGN VGO VGP VGQ VGR VGS VGT VGU VGV VGW VGX VGY VGZ VHA VHB VHC VHD VHE VHF VHG VHH VHI VHJ VHK...
Click to read more »19:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Hardcore Gamer is viewed as sorta unreliable in WP:VGRS. Is Danny O'Dwyer and Crossley, Rob part of the GameSpot staff? What's "Abstraction...
Click to read more »Venetian [vec], Veddah [ved], Venda [ven], Veps [vep], Vere [ver], Vaghri [vgr], Lesser Antillean Creole English [vib], Vidunda [vid], Vietnamese [vie]...
Click to read more »2kSRzsT6q7N2qbNW91oAB52gfl8VR26FY1agaGuktytOgJfALvSdPHna+9k4PqqDGs5SZ4k6mVGrJ2pnZb07dagKlOqIBzAiDobRB8JleZMXupWb15qS003ltwe06XSZ8Yt+JelDtFlGk6pV7DWgu...
Click to read more »should be removed from the article. Alexandra IDV, I have Game Crate, however VGRS rates it Situational, so I'm kinda anxious bout citing this. If unreliable...
Click to read more »Done - I'm still not 100% confident that this is clearly notable, but the VGRS search does return quite a few okay looking results, at least for such an...
Click to read more »NegativeMP1 16:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC) @Celtoi I recommend viewing WP:VGRS to see which sources are considered reliable for video game articles. Thanks...
Click to read more »Vemgo-Mabas, [ven] Venda, [veo] Ventureño, [vep] Veps, [ver] Mom Jango, [vgr] Vaghri, [vgt] Flemish Sign Language, [vgt] Vlaamse Gebarentaal, [vic] Virgin...
Click to read more »TheGamer already, and as the article was posted after August 2020 it meets the VGRS point that "News posts and original content after August 2020 are considered...
Click to read more »normally consider this as unreliable but given that another participant in the VGRS discussion found some WP:USEBYOTHERS there might be more in Italian, so I'm...
Click to read more »Masem who requested for its addition when I conversed with them. See this VGRS thread too. -t Reviewers were bored by the repeated navigation & Polygon's...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) As with all videogame articles, I'll be relying heavily on WP:VGRS. What makes The 64dream, Dengeki Nintendo 64 and Gamejin reliable sources...
Click to read more »spotchecking was done above. I'll disclaim that I am relying heavily on WP:VGRS for the sources now: Are Chris Carter and Andriessen, CJ from Destructoid...
Click to read more »makes this a reliable source? Otherwise it looks like we are working with WP:VGRS sauces so the usual caveat about that list applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk)...
Click to read more »Reliable per WP:VGRS. ✔ Yes "ENA Dream BBQ: How Long to Beat". GameRant. 2025-03-29. Retrieved 2025-03-31. ~ Situational per WP:VGRS. ? Unknown This table...
Click to read more »(249, -1, X, X R/X/L) europeandcis.undp.org/uploads/public/File/rbec_web/vgr/chapter1.1.pdf (249, 79, 1, 1 R/X/L) www.edrc.ro/docs/docs/Romii_din_Romania...
Click to read more »User_Trams_WikiProject (links) Template:User_Trams_WikiProject (exists?) No 1451 T:VGR (links) Template:Video_game_reviews (exists?) No 1452 WPSurrey_Award (links)...
Click to read more »de/hh/gesamt/Verf_HA.htm#Verf_HA_rahmen (2221, 40, 3, 0 R/X/L) www.vgrdl.de/Arbeitskreis_VGR/tbls/tab.asp?lang=de-DE&tbl=tab01 (2221, 68, 1, 0 R/X/L) www.statistik-portal...
Click to read more »Rock, Paper, Shotgun, The Escapist, PC Gamer, and Android Central, all WP:VGRS. Skyshiftertalk 19:40, 22 August 2026 (UTC) Keep the unprose-ified reception...
Click to read more »Destructoid again. In this case it's being used to support a fact, which VGRS says is okay if the author can be established as reliable. So: how is Jordan...
Click to read more »- a quick skim through sources: GoNintendo is listed as unreliable at WP:VGRS Grinding Down is a wordpress blog, needs replaced I can't tell if "Payton...
Click to read more »main characters are, well, cats. Not SIGCOV. 4. 1UP.com. Reliable per WP:VGRS, coverage is significant. 7. The archive link appears to be hijacked, and...
Click to read more »vfz vga vgb vgc vgd vge vgf vgg vgh vgi vgj vgk vgl vgm vgn vgo vgp vgq vgr vgs vgt vgu vgv vgw vgx vgy vgz vha vhb vhc vhd vhe vhf vhg vhh vhi vhj vhk...
Click to read more »sources used in this one are marked as either unreliable or inconclusive at WP:VGRS, including some used heavily. Needs some significant work to improve the...
Click to read more »seem to be missing the second page. Escapist is listed as situational at WP:VGRS, although this may be due to a time frame when they exercised little oversight...
Click to read more »Beda, Bedda, Vaedda, Veddha, Weddo vel Veluwe ven Cevenda ver Kobo, Verre vgr Bavri, Salavta, Vaghri Koli vgt VGT vid Chividunda, Kividunda vie Annamese...
Click to read more »on WP:VGRS and WP:RS/PS. In particular: Dexerto is noted as a "tabloid publication" on VGRS TheGamer is noted as a "situational source" on VGRS (see:...
Click to read more »22:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC) PC Gamer is considered a reliable source at WP:VGRS--Prisencolin (talk) 22:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Keep Significant WP:RS coverage...
Click to read more »Igromania. Archived from the original on 2021-01-22. Retrieved 2021-03-23. WP:VGRS#Non-English Kowtows to Among Us ✘ No Paez (2020-11-19). "Among Us new map...
Click to read more »consensus, and time is probably too short to start a full discussion over at VGRS. I think I'll courtesy ping @Zxcvbnm for a second opinion here. If all checks...
Click to read more »more would push it over the line. Rupples (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC) WP:VGRS considers SVG unreliable, and Game Rant unfit for establishing notability...
Click to read more »Business Insider, so it does not meet the FA "high-quality RS" standard. WP:VGRS lists Softonic as inconclusive on being an RS, so it does not meet the FA...
Click to read more »from the original on 2015-02-03. Retrieved March 15, 2026. Press release WP:VGRS ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing...
Click to read more »are from before then) HeyUGuys Sources that are listed as unreliable at VGRS and need replaced Neoseeker Nintendo Everything Hog Farm Bacon 04:19, 4 January...
Click to read more »main characters are, well, cats. Not SIGCOV. 4. 1UP.com. Reliable per WP:VGRS, coverage is significant. 7. The archive link appears to be hijacked, and...
Click to read more »an outside contributor (a noted concern at VGRS). Breezy Scroll Not discussed anywhere in WP:RSP or WP:VGRS, list of team members is entirely informal...
Click to read more »[vafs1240], Vaghat-Ya-Bijim-Legeri language [bij] - [vagh1247], Vaghri language [vgr] - [vagh1246], Vaghua language [tva] - [vagh1249], Vagla language [vag] -...
Click to read more »in Roblox Dress To Impress". The Escapist. Retrieved October 26, 2025. WP:VGRS, not written between October 2017 – July 2018 see above source ✘ No Vincent...
Click to read more »Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC) See also the discussions listed at VGRS Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources#Unreliable_sources. Hemiauchenia...
Click to read more »Sariel Xilo (talk) 04:38, 20 April 2026 (UTC) Comment originally made at WT:VGRS; see additional new comment below. Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:33, 20 April 2026...
Click to read more »is a different question. It's also worth noting that WP:RSP links to WP:VGRS#Valnet, which says In general, these sites should not be used to demonstrate...
Click to read more »February 2023 (UTC) Weak Delete The Hardcore Gaming source is SIGCOV and VGRS, but other than that all I can find is a Japanese review of unknown reliability...
Click to read more »in this specific RPGish or technical meaning: many passing mentions in WP:VGRS, e.g. usage by devs talking about game design [12][13] and in patch notes...
Click to read more »[vafs1240], Vaghat-Ya-Bijim-Legeri language [bij] - [vagh1247], Vaghri language [vgr] - [vagh1246], Vaghua language [tva] - [vagh1249], Vagla language [vag] -...
Click to read more »multi/ddg Unknown OSTI Unknown J.League manager Unknown Find sources multi/vgrs Unknown MusicBrainz label Unknown Cite NSRW Unknown Find sources multi/wrs...
Click to read more »I'm assuming we are discussing the articles that @Why? I Ask: listed. The VGR source is about Korb, and doesn't mention a song in specific. Same goes for...
Click to read more »per WP:VGRS... Liquipedia is WP:UGC, Dexerto should rarely be used for BLPs (WP:DEXERTO), HLTV and GINX are not a reliable source per WP:VGRS, BLAST is...
Click to read more »reviewing a GAN and amoung the sources used is a Kotaku review from 2023. The WP:VGRS says that Kotaku from 2023 onwards is on a case by case basis. I looked at...
Click to read more »article is from their esports section, which is considered reliable per WP:VGRS. I'm unsure what you are considering "unreliable." Why are we considering...
Click to read more »assesment table, including a misapplication of the Kotaku source. Again, the VGRS says News posts from Kotaku between 2010 and 2022 are considered reliable...
Click to read more »sources are well-established, reputable Australian media outlets; see WP:VGRS for Polygon's reliability. Bridget (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2026 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC) Seems to be listed as inconclusive on WP:VGRS - nathanielcwm (talk) 02:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC) I dread finding Wccftech sources...
Click to read more »I'll look at the new ones. Still qualifying that I am relying heavily on WP:VGRS. What makes https://mantan-web.jp a reliable source? Has Siliconera improved...
Click to read more »assessing WP:Due weight. It's also worth noting that WP:RSP links to WP:VGRS#Valnet, which says In general, these sites should not be used to demonstrate...
Click to read more »don't seem to be reliable; thexboxhub.com is listed as unreliable on WP:VGRS, gamecritix.com looks AI-generated, gaming.net is less obviously unreliable...
Click to read more »of which are not independent of the subject), and HLTV (unreliable per WP:VGRS). A WP:BEFORE search does not find anything of substance either. – Pbrks (t·c)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep The 2nd & 3rd sources presented by nominator are reviews from VGRS, here is a third one which is enough for WP:GNG Jumpytoo Talk 06:19, 10 November...
Click to read more »previous discussion on, and Gaming Target where one person said in 2009 on WP:VGRS was unreliable. The UK Anime review is OK as its an Andy Hanley review per...
Click to read more »Rock, Paper, Shotgun, The Escapist, PC Gamer, and Android Central, all WP:VGRS. Skyshiftertalk 19:40, 22 August 2026 (UTC) Keep the unprose-ified reception...
Click to read more »ago, no cited source (or the ones listed at MobyGames) seems to be at WP:VGRS. I am afraid this game is not notable. The single award (" The game placed...
Click to read more »spotchecking was done above. I'll disclaim that I am relying heavily on WP:VGRS for the sources now: Are Chris Carter and Andriessen, CJ from Destructoid...
Click to read more »Everything else seems reliable but note that I have to rely extensively on WP:VGRS since I don't know most of these sauces. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:30, 22 July...
Click to read more »the sources here, neither Gaming Respawn nor Player One are listed at WP:VGRS, Supertext is the blog of a commerical copywriting company, and the University...
Click to read more »towards displaying notability. HLTV is not considered a reliable source per WP:VGRS Neox Games is still an interview, so WP:PRIMARY CSGO is not independent Blix...
Click to read more »reliable source is the Nintendo Life article, which is reputable per WP:VGRS. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Berman (4th nomination), which...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hello @Ertizoel. Good and bad sources for videögames are listed at WP:VGRS. You should avoid sourcing unreliäble ones except in extraordinary circumstances...
Click to read more »possibly count towards notability. The following are all reliable per WP:VGRS: Esports Insider, Venture Beat, and PCGamesN. Also, Esports Advocate is probably...
Click to read more »There are sources posted on the talk page, WP:CSM and Gamezebo which is WP:VGRS. That being said... the second line is copied from the Pocket Gamer source...
Click to read more »Where does #49 speak of a satellite studio? Usual caveat about relying on WP:VGRS. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC) Hi @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Joe...
Click to read more »unfamiliar with this source - is it a high-quality RS? This isn't on WP:VGRS, which tends to make me think this is a fairly obscure source DemiVision...
Click to read more »claimed were "authoritative sources"[310] demonstrably weren't according to WP:VGRS[311]), that certainly now feel designed to try and bait me into making a...
Click to read more »- I'm not a huge fan of citing a Valnet publication (TheGamer) for FAC. VGRS notes that it's "generally reliable" for "news posts and original content"...
Click to read more »November 2024 (UTC) Going to throw the major caveat that I am relying on WP:VGRS rather heavily here. I see that TheGamer is flagged as reliable only after...
Click to read more »TheGamer already, and as the article was posted after August 2020 it meets the VGRS point that "News posts and original content after August 2020 are considered...
Click to read more »must qualify my review with the observation that I'll heavily rely on WP:VGRS for lack of subject-matter knowledge. It seems like most sources are reliable...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) As with all videogame articles, I'll be relying heavily on WP:VGRS. What makes The 64dream, Dengeki Nintendo 64 and Gamejin reliable sources...
Click to read more »consensus, and time is probably too short to start a full discussion over at VGRS. I think I'll courtesy ping @Zxcvbnm for a second opinion here. If all checks...
Click to read more »19:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Hardcore Gamer is viewed as sorta unreliable in WP:VGRS. Is Danny O'Dwyer and Crossley, Rob part of the GameSpot staff? What's "Abstraction...
Click to read more »makes this a reliable source? Otherwise it looks like we are working with WP:VGRS sauces so the usual caveat about that list applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk)...
Click to read more »