Redirect to:
Good indentation makes prolonged discussions easier to read and understand. It might be helpful to think of discussions as reports with numbered/bulleted...
Click to read more »if you know what someone means by "undent". SFB 18:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Do not merge The purpose of {{Undent}} appears to be closer to that of {{Outdent2}}...
Click to read more »December 2008 (UTC) I removed the match.--WillC 01:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC) (undent) I know you don't agree with the removal of that match, but I do feel that...
Click to read more »discussion flowing that I've seen, and I too think it works better than the undent template. GedUK 14:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC) What would be wrong with a...
Click to read more »really make sense historically. --Nlu (talk) 07:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC) (undent) Keep Notable element of ROTK. Ling.Nut 11:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Keep These...
Click to read more »Template:Undent with Template:Outdent2. They are used for the same thing. {{outdent2}} is, seemingly, also more frequently used. Template:Undent should...
Click to read more »Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC) (undent) Fallen apples section has been removed (not by me). I've rewritten the...
Click to read more »available to Wikipedia readers. (Centpacrr (talk) 03:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)) (undent) I just noticed that there is no link on the article to say this article...
Click to read more »getting all of the pages? —Coastergeekperson04's talk@May/08/08 03:02 (undent) Yes, the API doesn't allow more that 500 categories, except for flagged...
Click to read more »the {{nobots}} system. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 12:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC) (undent) whoo hoo! :) CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC) John Bot still...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC) (undent) Keep This phrase is distinguished from creationism and has particular meaning...
Click to read more »People can make up. ——Martinphi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 04:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Undent: A bit of background, As seen at User:Kelly's talk page archive here, [30]...
Click to read more »always appear just for you. Calvin 1998 (t·c) 03:29, 11 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) The question didn't say anything about making it appear just for you. I...
Click to read more »to go back further than 5 edits. Winbots 00:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC) ("undenting") We don't flag bots that deal with vandalism, so the edit rate will have...
Click to read more »(UTC) I agree with the above. LuciferMorgan 14:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC) (undent). I'm done with all four papers & one of my four finals. I'll be finished...
Click to read more »(Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC) (undent) Okay, I will completely drop the debate about this not being a list. I...
Click to read more »rape and other criminal acts. ThuranX (talk) 21:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) *Sigh* perhaps it is... it doesn't alter the fact that my approach is from...
Click to read more »a similar colour palette. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC) (undent) I chose the colours to match as closely as I could the USGS original, bearing...
Click to read more »(t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 16:14, 18 December 2008 (UTC) (undent) WLU you have provided only 2 content diffs. One where Guido removed a cite...
Click to read more »aviation, doesn't meet WP:SPS. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) Ok, another try: Joe Baugher is notable enough to have his own wiki article...
Click to read more »comments to their correct place. Sandstein 19:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC) (undent) In this edit [95] Timidguy again removed top quality references supporting...
Click to read more »The picture needs clarification. Dbfirs 07:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC) (undent) Or perhaps doing some rerendering. Actually, what really would help is...
Click to read more »from being edited. Firsfron of Ronchester 11:24, 9 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) Unfamiliarity??? :-) No, I'm not referring to the GA system preventing...
Click to read more »correct for BrE YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 13:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC) (undent) Support – Another excellent cricket article from YM, which is of similar...
Click to read more »improved quality. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 15:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC) <undent>Sorry but it does not seem like this person is going to seriously edit Wikipedia...
Click to read more »should be recorded as well. Awadewit (talk) 05:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC) (undent) Did anyone bring any chips? I'm a bit hungry. Ling.Nut.Public (talk) 06:27...
Click to read more »you say there aren't any? Gwen Gale (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC) (undent)Ok, not to rehash every thing from scratch and go into a circular debate...
Click to read more »to the WikiProject, GAR, or GAC. IvoShandor 02:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC) (undent) Yeah... I'd feel OK about having a barnstar for a large-ish number of GAs...
Click to read more »into a GA...-- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 01:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC) (undent) No offense taken, I understand your argument. Just one more statement and...
Click to read more »visible, or that I might miss on reading. Medains 10:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC) (undent) Yes... I really do appreciate for your help, and I also want to separate...
Click to read more »extremely unlikely. Regards Buckshot06(prof) 17:47, 7 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) User:Romaioi, do you wish to comment on User:Noclador's description of...
Click to read more »fundamental nature of the poll. ThuranX (talk) 03:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) Thuranx, please read the conversation between me and the anon on the talk...
Click to read more »things to human judgement! Rotational (talk) 05:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC) (undent)I doubt anyone wants to hear this, and it will certainly be ignored by many...
Click to read more »restriction as a consequence of? —Whig (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC) <undent>Whig ALWAYS claims he is under no editing restriction. But he is, and this...
Click to read more »all languages do that.Mephiston999 (talk) 02:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC) (undent) I guess, though it could be explained in a way better fashion in the top...
Click to read more »that's not what I asked.Ferrylodge (talk) 21:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC) (undent)Perhaps it should be mentioned here that Mastcell has requested action from...
Click to read more »right mind will object to. Giano (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC) ((Undent)) Just for the record, can VK please give us what he thinks his current...
Click to read more »same terms as the previous trial. ST47 (talk) 20:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC) (undent) The Bot run approved above was delayed due to a controversy I became aware...
Click to read more »therefore, is in bad faith. RafaelRGarcia (talk) 05:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC) (undent) I was in the process of writing up my own 3RR complaint about RafaelRGarcia...
Click to read more »fundamental nature of the poll. ThuranX (talk) 03:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) Thuranx, please read the conversation between me and the anon on the talk...
Click to read more »please don't delete them. Kristelzorina (talk) 14:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC) (undent) It's a little unlikely that anyone will delete anything. It's much more...
Click to read more »May 2008 (UTC) Is this it? --S.dedalus (talk) 02:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC) <undent><edit conflict>I just posted the number when we conflicted and I believe...
Click to read more »05:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC) WP:RFCU Mr.Z-man 05:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) And apparently, he's thinking of attacking Jimbo Wales' talk. [18] and...
Click to read more »give a valuable lesson. :) --Caspian blue 00:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) Concerns of admin abuse by Nihonjoe I found the not-so-surprising report...
Click to read more »the ban discussion was insufficient. --B 22:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC) <undent>I think this is a bad bad idea. If you unleash this holy terror on us to...
Click to read more »and a bit tariff. LessHeard vanU (talk) 17:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC) (undent)Who would you ask for that? J-ſtanContribsUser page 23:43, 22 December 2007...
Click to read more »amazon.com. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 11:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) This diff shows all the efforts by the editor in question. Among them,...
Click to read more »But that's just me. Equazcion •✗/C • 21:12, 22 Mar 2008 (UTC) (undent)Sometimes I undent. NonvocalScream (talk) 18:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Then the colons...
Click to read more »vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 21:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC) (undent / ec) Much as it pains me, as it is not in the spirit of the project, I...
Click to read more »protect the user talk page. Toddst1 (talk) 20:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC) <undent> This is a bit ridiculous. Angry Christian has been doing yoeman's service...
Click to read more »is to the deletion proposal. Gatoclass (talk) 04:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) Heck, I'll even help you verify. Gladly. But be warned: a list that long...
Click to read more »euphemism for content dispute. -Chunky Rice 20:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC) (undent)I would really like to hear User:davidcannon's take on all this. On the...
Click to read more »under the circumstances. Tonywalton | Talk 15:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) They (User:Iamandrewrice and User:Christine118500) both pass the duck test...
Click to read more »rights. Wikipedia is not EFF. Cool Hand Luke 02:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC) (undent) Honestly, a policy against deep linking sounds like a cash grab to me....
Click to read more »community with no more patience.) —Cesar Tort 04:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC) {undent}WP:SHUN. No need for drama, no need for replies. With no response from the...
Click to read more »you'd do the same too. Cheers! --Dave1185 (talk) 22:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) That's why I asked what was racist. I figured it was something like that...
Click to read more »--Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 02:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC) (undent) Ok, for everyone else, this is a continuation or just following...
Click to read more »deleted - it was moved, so... Ale_Jrbtalk 11:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) OK, I give up. Clearly others disagree with me (and possibly the AfD would...
Click to read more »next reboot. False alarm! --TraceyR (talk) 13:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC) undent Ok, I've reworked the "Fundementals" section, and add a brief history section...
Click to read more »engage in these areas. --Relata refero (disp.) 18:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC) <undent>My reading of this thread, is that Shoemaker is basically pointing out a...
Click to read more »you. It certainly wasn't on me. BabyDweezil 15:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC) (undent) There is no irony, intentional or otherwise. What you call "deprecating...
Click to read more »be done. --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC) (arbitrary undent) Kettle, meet pot. ✎ Peter M Dodge (Talk to Me) 23:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »we could take this to the talk page.--Docg 02:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) Good luck. The website for the current council has pictures, I believe...
Click to read more »08:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC) I'm bowing out now, BTW. I also suggest undenting this whole thing, as John did. SexySeaBass 08:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and taken the article to AfD. SilverserenC 05:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC) <Undent>My two cents: WP:Primary and WP:BLPPRIMARY could usefully be edited to prevent...
Click to read more »wrote a little louder?--Victor9876 (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2009 (UTC) (undent) Victor, could you please explain 1) where the reason is stated in WP:3RR...
Click to read more »WP:NOTADVERTISING. I myself can not. Rgoodermote 00:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC) <undent>Never mind I read more it seems he does want to abide by Wiki Policy. So...
Click to read more »completely if that is what they want.:) --Bobblehead 01:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC) (undent) One point I'll make is it seems like many users want the option of not...
Click to read more »regarding the reported incidents. ThuranX 06:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC) (undent) Here is the related COI section regarding User:Tom Butler, who has been...
Click to read more »Anyway, I hope some of that helps, Hiding Talk 18:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) The actual text of WP:BOLD in Exceptions is: "The Wikipedia community encourages...
Click to read more »you and Astandhope? --Milo H Minderbinder 20:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) editing there at all is stalking me (perhaps you are confused that Girondin=Mastcell)...
Click to read more »regarding Rbj. No one commented. [67] Orangemarlin 06:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC) (Undenting) Here [68] is the last version of that section before it got archived...
Click to read more »be done. --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC) (arbitrary undent) Kettle, meet pot. ✎ Peter M Dodge (Talk to Me) 23:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »problem, but this ain't it.--Tznkai (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC) <undent>I am really not willing to pursue this argument with you Tznkai, I have...
Click to read more »learned the error of his ways. the wub "?!" 17:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC) (undent) There aren't "degrees of insults" we should be using to rank such words...
Click to read more »volunteers, not conscripts.-- Vintei Talk 01:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC) (undent)Yeah, so do I. I think Vintei and I are speaking for all shop owners (there...
Click to read more »don't know about the latter). — neuro(talk) 09:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC) (undent) Was my thoughts as well, so I pointed it out here not completely sure if...
Click to read more »thought you were banned from this topic? Verbal chat 15:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Undent. Providing evidence of previous, extensive, source-based discussion is not...
Click to read more »explanation is clearly out of line"[3].--Berig (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC) (undent) As an uninvolved, non-admin observer I'm trying to see where Berig breached...
Click to read more »who's the problem here. Simon Dodd (talk) 02:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC) (undent)This article definitely could use semi-protection, to stop edit-warring...
Click to read more »who don't feel like reading it all? Aeon Flux 05:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC) (undenting) For present purposes, I don't care if the block was righteous. The issue...
Click to read more »Adler's advice is well informed. Orderinchaos 03:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC) (undent) I hope this admin problem --not the content dispute which is irrelevant...
Click to read more »someone who can. Kafziel Complaint Department 00:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC) <Undent. It seems to me, that if some anon comes along and says they're deleting...
Click to read more »supposed to be helpful. Brilliantine (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC) (Undent) Could we please leave off this subject? There is currently no damage that...
Click to read more »to the talk page. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC) (undent) Deleting against consensus -IS- wrong, but everyone deserves a bad day...
Click to read more »agree with them, probably).Wikidemon (talk) 00:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC) (Undent)In my capacity as an administrator familiar with edits in question, I am...
Click to read more »Probably the WP Bio talk page. –xeno (talk) 18:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC) (undent) It is suggested that there was some subversion of the MOSNUM process. Then...
Click to read more »these articles. Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 04:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC) (Undent) Uninvolved administrators are welcome to get involved, but I intend to...
Click to read more »concern - with other issues. Wildhartlivie (talk) 10:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC) (undent) Not prior to today. I have said it all along. "Date linking (aka "user...
Click to read more »good reason. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 07:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC) (undent) Maybe the articles talk page would be a better place to discuss this. Tiptoety...
Click to read more »annoyed about these things. Thunderer (talk) 20:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC) (Undent)Two notes. One, the relevant article page is protected. Two, the involved...
Click to read more »reason is there to do it? ~ AmeIiorate U T C @ 23:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) I really doubt that Beta needs the help of any external tools at all to...
Click to read more »seriously disrupting its peace. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:19, 20 January 2008 (UTC) (undent) @ B: I would not be averse to shortening the block. I was originally going...
Click to read more »awareness hereafter. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 02:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC) (undent). Thanks. Ling.Nut (talk) 05:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Three-revert rule violation...
Click to read more »into a GA...-- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 01:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC) (undent) No offense taken, I understand your argument. Just one more statement and...
Click to read more »accelerate this up to the next level. Thanks. Wjhonson 05:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Undent. I have posted cogent rebuttal to the most salacious of claims...
Click to read more »applies in this case. John Carter (talk) 18:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC) (UNDENT) Can someone explain in fifty words or less, why topic banning or not topicbanning...
Click to read more »encourage him for new edit wars. --Icykip2005 (talk) 20:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC) (Undent) If he does edit war again, then report him here again. Ed made the right...
Click to read more »with it, they can intervene. Orderinchaos 05:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC) (Undent) I'm all for it. BJAODN is a bunch of crap, and it gets worse with every...
Click to read more »Goodermote. Shapiros10 contact meMy work 14:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC) (ec)(undent)I wish it was Roger. No my name is Robert Edward Goodermote Junior. Last...
Click to read more »clerk here instead. :p Jéské (Blah v-_^v) 05:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC) <undent>{{clerknote}} Why not have him cool down at this page? -Goodshoped 05:20...
Click to read more »approval as I was told by the BAG. --Lemmey talk 08:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC) (undent) If it's really an issue, couldn't you just run the bot under a different...
Click to read more »the subject interesting? Alastairward (talk) 22:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC) (undent) Well I've said my bit already. The game was published in a widely read...
Click to read more »proper way handling the dispute.Vvmundakkal 10:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) I will simply respond by noting Vvmundakkal has complained about this exact...
Click to read more »that'll help him understand. Snowfire51 (talk) 09:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) There are two things that can be done. 1) The user above clearly shows...
Click to read more »bit longer before acting. :) MastCell Talk 03:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC) (undent)This is NOT a new issue. Gni has been warned repeatedly of this, and should...
Click to read more »concern is more for TheslBDie4Dixie (talk) 23:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC) <undent>Get some tea mate. Rgoodermote 23:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC) <ironic reindent>I...
Click to read more »someone's attention. --Calton | Talk 13:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC) (e/c) (undent) For what it's worth, given the fuss, I've spend some time walking backwards...
Click to read more »for several days longer. Carcharoth (talk) 12:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) I'm going to just leave this alone and hope it passes away then. Epthorn...
Click to read more »certainly would come under fair use. Mathmo Talk 09:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC) (Undent) Honestly, taking a moment to divorce the question from the article's subject...
Click to read more »myself about 6 months ago. — Scientizzle 21:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) Actually, this venue is as good as any. If the new version created in the...
Click to read more »or harmful at worst. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 03:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC) (undent)Endorse Holy shit. That's rediculous. This was FAR worse than I suspected...
Click to read more »needs to know, already does. Guy (Help!) 20:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) Sam indef blocked Sw as a vandalism-only account, and then accidentally...
Click to read more »potential FL here. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Undent I'm willing to compromise on the date thing, but I'd like to hear your opinion...
Click to read more »approaching the point for a topic ban or something. -- 05:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) FYI, the comment that started all this edit warring from Corticopia was...
Click to read more »abide by the outcome." — Carl (CBM · talk) 23:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC) <undent> I should just point out that Carl doubtless acted in good faith, assuming...
Click to read more »not for us commonfolk. :) Enigma message 06:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC) ←(undent) NuclearWarfare: Yes, oversight would work, but would not just remove the...
Click to read more »2 November 2007 (UTC) 15. --Eleemosynary 18:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC) (undent)Enough already – both of you. The next person to speak is going to lose...
Click to read more »to make no more edits as Berks105. --Berks105 10:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC) (undent)Be careful when bandying about charges of vandalism. Vandalism is narrowly...
Click to read more »can step forward.--Certified.Gangsta (talk) 06:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) Notified Slashem so he can respond if he wants. Kusma, if you want to talk...
Click to read more »harrassment in your persistence. - Caribbean~H.Q. 21:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) Oh, how I wish someone had informed me about this. Either way, I guess...
Click to read more »[39] is just ridiculous. - Caribbean~H.Q. 08:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) I have engaged Kubura in debate at one of the "affected" RfA's [40] which...
Click to read more »consider mentioning it to AN. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC) (undent) User:Hobartimus posted a comment on my user page so I'm trying to centralize...
Click to read more »immediately is validation of this fact. Arzel (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC) (undent) Why is the report "bogus"? If it's inappropriate, an admin will look at...
Click to read more »of courtesy, I'll block it forever. Duja► 14:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC) (undent) was not blocked with account creation disabled. I've corrected this. SQL(Query...
Click to read more »behaviour you think offensive Nishidani (talk) 20:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) @ Nickhh - Your reaction to a compliment I paid you -- I consider the ability...
Click to read more »there's not a lot much more we can do. Keegantalk 20:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC) (undent) most of the TKE stuff is because Wikileaks has posted their manual. ThuranX...
Click to read more »songs-related deletion discussions. —TexasAndroid (talk) 15:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC) (undent) I Feel this article should stay as it is and shouldnt be redirected to...
Click to read more »button is especially hidden either. Mr.Z-man 06:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) I hate to throw a red herring out here but isn't anyone concerned about...
Click to read more »parameter that can be used. Carcharoth (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC) (undent) For the record: I'm the one who blanked User talk:EliasAlucard's talk page...
Click to read more »blocked for a while... Igor Berger (talk) 07:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC) (undent) OK I un-redirected my talk. Nothing to se here. Move along. :-) Later!...
Click to read more »hours, something's wrong again. Pinball22 00:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC) (Undent) I saw the "Give It" banner on... my watchlist, IIRC. Only that one time...
Click to read more »banned for he's still been doing. 2 lines of K303 12:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC) (undent)Everyone makes mistakes. Beam 12:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Some people drop...
Click to read more »within my rights to make the edits. EarlyBird 19:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC) (undent) I have just removed EarlyBird from WP:AIV as I noticed this discussion...
Click to read more »anything I did there. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 11:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC) (Undent) NO it's not. There were two issues here. Your edits against Elonka's relatives'...
Click to read more »example of canvassing. -- SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 21:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC) (undent)Since some opinions have been expressed, I might as well say I also consider...
Click to read more »fundamental nature of the poll. ThuranX (talk) 03:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) Thuranx, please read the conversation between me and the anon on the talk...
Click to read more »anything worse. Georgewilliamherbert 03:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC) <---undent So, are you saying that you see the point about the apparent lack of a preventative...
Click to read more »or block is in order. GtstrickyTalk or C 01:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) I've notified the user that a rename is required, and will give him some...
Click to read more »discussion of future sanctions. --Rocksanddirt 17:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC) (undent) As another uninvolved (except only for supporting Elonka's RfA) nonadmin...
Click to read more »gave a reason in that scenario. Enigma message 23:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC) <undent "Must you try to seek publicity from every single minor threat on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »joke about it like this. 70.243.80.195 (talk) 11:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC) (undent)Since some opinions have been expressed, I might as well say I also consider...
Click to read more »conservative bias is laughable. Horologium (talk) 17:55, 20 July 2008 (UTC) (Undent) Ugly stuff, gentlemen. What I see here is an entire thread based on a "denunciation"...
Click to read more »complaints elsewhere. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 04:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC) (Undent) Lucky for SWATjester there were enough cases to make that fit. Elias, YOu...
Click to read more »probably would have said fuck it, you know? Dina 05:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC) (Undent) Nah, I'm with Dina on this one. Welcome messages are kind of cool - they...
Click to read more »really, given their record. Orderinchaos 14:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) Why are we even considering anything short of a full ban? Did any single...
Click to read more »to discuss these issues? — xDanielx T/C 02:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC) (undent) I'm not aware that being a DeleteElf is a reason for being blocked. Wikipedia:Disruptive...
Click to read more »sources for the AS topic. David D. (Talk) 08:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC) <undent>I am one of the 'orrible editors who threatened Sitadel. Though actually...
Click to read more »negative or positive.Turtlescrubber (talk) 04:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC) (undent)The reason I came here is because duplicative material should not be jammed...
Click to read more »He's still around. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 11:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) Since we've gone almost a day without comment, could someone other than...
Click to read more »back to the topic now? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC) (Undent) Overall, if the net effect of a given user is more crap than good, indefinite...
Click to read more »to excluding on purpose. (LAz17 (talk) 03:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)). (undent) Ummm...I'm hoping that someone else can take a look at this thread as it...
Click to read more »move on to productive pursuits.--Epeefleche 23:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC) (Undent) That's an interesting, but ultimately stale, rehash of all that was said...
Click to read more »╟─TreasuryTag►Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster─╢ 14:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC) (Undent) "This should be obvious to a semi-lobotomised chimpanzee let alone to anyone...
Click to read more »counseling might be in order. Tvoz |talk 00:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC) <undent>Maybe all he needs is a little directing and guidance. Tiptoety talk 00:22...
Click to read more »concern to some extent.--71.247.123.9 (talk) 09:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC) (undent)the item for tomorrow reads "The discovery of a bed of dinosaur fossils...
Click to read more »confirms that the tour date did exist. CrowzRSA 22:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC) (undent) ok let me put it this way, for the Kill the Industry tour, the dates it...
Click to read more »eboard%2FIncidents&action=historysubmit&diff=410616434&oldid=410615794 {undent}(Edit Conflict) Thank you, Editor:Horologium For infoming me about this...
Click to read more »not say if you guess. --alidoostzadeh (talk) 22:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC) <-undent: There is no need to repeat the arguments ad nauseum. Links to copyright...
Click to read more »scrutiny is required. --Relata refero (disp.) 05:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC) <undent>People over and over have said that the standard methods work fine, that...
Click to read more »achieved their goal. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 07:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC) (Undent) - I have sent an e-mail to the user telling them that there are some extra...
Click to read more »understandably difficult to understand. Equazcion •✗/C • 17:14, 8 Mar 2008 (UTC) (undent) But are we sure it is purposeful disruption? Or is it maybe just a user...
Click to read more »an all out war on editing.. Cowman109Talk 06:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC) (undent) Bluntly, what about it? 'Just followin orders' isn't really ever a great...
Click to read more »comment on this phenomenon. 65.46.253.42 (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC) (undent) Actually the discussion I linked is from several months before that, but...
Click to read more »recusal request? Best wishes, DurovaCharge! 17:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC) (undent) Um, maybe the best way to deal with any perceived issues of bias on my...
Click to read more »encyclopaedic fashion, as it were." Balloonman 16:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC) (undent) No less than three dedicated editors of this article have explicitly stated...
Click to read more »Arbuthnot family clear – see here. – iridescent 13:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC) (undent)The big deal part COI issue is discussed above, but my concern is mostly...
Click to read more »in the articles themselves! — kwami (talk) 13:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC) (undent) I think what would be fair is for Kwami to remove all the hyphens from...
Click to read more »mis-stated that in my closing.--chaser (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Undent. Which sources? I took the ones that were reliable from here and embedded...
Click to read more »(t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 12:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Undent. Reviewing JPH's talk page, I hadn't remembered for my above comment but...
Click to read more »story called common sense. Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC) (Undent) This is my read on the situation. Don't be a dick. If someone is being...
Click to read more »(less so) here... cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC) (undent) LHVU explains it quite succinctly. The point of NLT is to avoid editors...
Click to read more »objection to writing articles to policy? PRtalk 10:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC) (undent)The whole WP:SELFPUB argument is moot, by the way - the discussion had gone...
Click to read more »all this has been explained. Guy (Help!) 22:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC) [← Undent ←] Guy, Relisting less than 24 hours after protection was refused, with...
Click to read more »myself, I want this over. TheAE talk/sign 21:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC) <undent> American Eagle, you can end your problems very quickly. Just follow WP:V...
Click to read more »Ferrylodge is a matter of record.) SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 18:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC) (undent)I've stricken the comment in question at my personal talk page. It was not...
Click to read more »chance. Till then? No. SirFozzie (talk) 11:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC) (Undent) Sorry, but the troll accusation isn't something that I can leave unchallenged...
Click to read more »century archaeologists. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC) <undent> It wasn't my intention to drag a content dispute here, and I ask all participants...
Click to read more »version, looks better. Doug Weller (talk) 16:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC) (Undent) Having read the article, it appears to be about a line of toys that don't...
Click to read more »pattern of behavior. — Sizzle Flambé (☎/✍) 17:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC) (undent) Support community ban of Bharatveer. The evidence collected in WP:Requests...
Click to read more »of wikipedia clear as day. Locewtus (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC) (undent) Try a Google search for 'active thermitic material' and wikipedia. You...
Click to read more »artists from this website. Rgoodermote 21:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC) (undent)I am perfectly fine with Krista continuing to edit. I have left a rather...
Click to read more »appear is also worthwhile. EdJohnston (talk) 03:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) sorry for the lateness of my reply. I guess I am looking for some sort...
Click to read more »person in the context. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:58, 22 August 2008 (UTC) {undent) I initially thought this was from the recent crash, but these are old crashes...
Click to read more »own ANI filing ... :-) (talk→ BMW ←track) 18:06, 6 January 2009 (UTC) (undent)Serait une première pour moi. Rgoodermote 18:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Szlevi (talk ·...
Click to read more »of an opposing point of view. Guy (Help!) 17:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC) (undent) I think Vassyana should recuse herself from this discussion given her abuse...
Click to read more »broken is not against WP:R? - Neparis (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC) (undent) I'm guessing that popups is set to "Automatically fix links to bypass redirects...
Click to read more »administrators have said not so much. Grsz11 21:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC) (undent) It looks fine from the OTRS end of things. It's ticket 2009101410052623...
Click to read more »makes the job too easy. HalfShadow (talk) 17:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC) [undent] The block was because I told an admin my account was compromised. I had...
Click to read more »Corvus, complain to Jimbo.--Tznkai (talk) 06:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC) (Undent) I wish our rules permitted me to block every user with distasteful opinions...
Click to read more »FRINGE applying in the slightest.- Mgm|(talk) 09:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC) (undent) Back to the issue: The actions are disruptive. I have made it as linked/clear...
Click to read more »respond at length about any topic.--scuro (talk) 10:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC) (undent) Edit count as requested on the ADHD talk page: Scuro (648) Jmh649 (373)...
Click to read more »admins willing to do it. -- Fyslee / talk 18:27, 25 November 2007 (UTC) (undent) Being an admin is a position of responsibility and trust, and public scrutiny...
Click to read more »better, and it is. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC) (undent) To whom it may concern: Malcolm Schosha received this warning from DGG...
Click to read more »other people.) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:51, 17 March 2011 (UTC) (Undent)Removing the phrase "pro-choice activist" was EXTREMELY CLEARLY a revert...
Click to read more »–BMRR (talk) 22:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC) Oppose the ban. Also I suggest undenting the votes; they are more-or-less harmless. Bwrs (talk) 23:45, 17 August...
Click to read more »this persistent vandal. --Kralizec! (talk) 23:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC) )undent( I concur... The rangeblocks, if they really ARE only this guy, should be...
Click to read more »for the world? —Remember the dot (talk) 00:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) Copyright violations are a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. Copyright owners...
Click to read more »and that's all this is, really. Black Kite 23:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC) (undent) If you want it in the main article, then I am perfectly fine with that...
Click to read more »statement supposed to mean?") Viriditas (talk) 12:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC) (undent) I should note that "administrative warnings" do not carry any more weight...
Click to read more »any even superficial detail. --Rodgarton 15:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC) {undent} As a friendly suggestion, perhaps if you were to respond concisely and...
Click to read more »source that says it, yet. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC) {undent} It appears that a reliable source has been found and the article has been...
Click to read more »under active sanctions. 66.127.52.47 (talk) 06:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC) (undent) I do think we should go through the trouble. If ROTA is the this guy, then...
Click to read more »hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 05:16, 27 September 2009 (UTC) (undent) Allow me to summarize both of the disputes. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk ·...
Click to read more »is wider than my own. TripEricson (talk) 14:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC) (undent) COI has nothing to do with profit or gain. If I write a book ranking Facial...
Click to read more »pipe."[9] talk about a buzzkill... --Ludwigs2 02:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC) (undent)Ludwigs2 how would you like to see the source used? Doc James (talk · contribs...
Click to read more »pressing the button all morning. Courcelles (talk) 16:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC) (undent)I'm for it (already proposed it earlier too). The editor has too long a...
Click to read more »should only be a last resort--Cailil talk 21:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC) (undent)A more concise phrasing might be: Topic bans should be used to prevent disruption...
Click to read more »information on this here. FCSundae ∨☃ (talk) 04:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC) (undent) Sure, I will go with 7,000 :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:39, 12 March 2010...
Click to read more »something like the status quo before. --doncram 13:48, 29 July 2011 (UTC) (undent) Isn't this what Wikipedia:Requested moves is for, and don't the regular...
Click to read more »they'd deal with it better? JoeSmack Talk 03:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC) (undent) Oooh..."Specious" and "Spurious"...I'm impressed by your vocabulary! lol...
Click to read more »for input are just too much.Cptnono (talk) 17:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC) {Undent}Verbal has been editing entirely appropriately at this page. There are some...
Click to read more »of the Star trek analogy.--Mark Miller (talk) 02:07, 29 May 2014 (UTC) (undent) Responding to the claims that the "old" issues with this editor are now...
Click to read more »its cited sources? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC) (undent) Strenuous Oppose for starters as per 1(b). It kinda spills over into 1(c)...
Click to read more »mommy out of the issue. . Off2riorob (talk) 02:10, 24 October 2011 (UTC) (undent) I was actually talking about your comment, but... whatever. Whoever started...
Click to read more »arbitration/Instantnood 3. Uncle G (talk) 19:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) Just my random two cents: why in [bleep!] should we eschew correctness...
Click to read more »this to other venues.--Mkativerata (talk) 22:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC) (undent) It seems like we have a group of people using Wikipedia Review to solicit...
Click to read more »a purely commercial view. Pedro : Chat 19:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC) (undent) My own personal opinion is that I am fine with the concept of professional...
Click to read more »you should hold onto. 71.63.91.68 (talk) 05:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC) <undent>Humour is one thing Sarsaparilla, but what exactly is your (very advisedly...
Click to read more »seems to be leading to. Equazcion •✗/C • 05:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) If you look at Wikipedia:User access levels#Table, you'll see that it's...
Click to read more »rather...startled. :p --Silversmith Hewwo 02:21, 3 November 2009 (UTC) [undent] Ahh, I see. Lots of identical bunnies. Ah well, if you get any other bunnies...
Click to read more »confirms that the tour date did exist. CrowzRSA 22:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC) (undent) ok let me put it this way, for the Kill the Industry tour, the dates it...
Click to read more »songs) I had added them in. σмgнgσмg(talk) 01:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC) (Undent)Well then why are there still a ton of blank cells in the other charted...
Click to read more »disagree! Funny that, isn't it? Rehevkor ✉ 03:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC) {undent}You're of course free to "disagree." But it doesn't fail WP:MUSIC, it doesn't...
Click to read more »upload scans of photographs. ;-) llywrch (talk) 21:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC) (undent) While we're on this subject, you want to know what I find upsetting? I...
Click to read more »something like that. Regards, Nsk92 (talk) 22:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC) <undent> It might be good to canvas editors and particularly legally trained editors...
Click to read more »all languages do that.Mephiston999 (talk) 02:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC) (undent) I guess, though it could be explained in a way better fashion in the top...
Click to read more »some agreement here. Regards, --RexxS (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC) [Undent] According to the page you link, we do not need header cell to have an accessible...
Click to read more »ASAP/As soon as possible. Bidgee (talk) 10:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC) (undent) Wouldn't it be nice to have a sysadmin or two in.. I dunno... Asia maybe...
Click to read more »potential FL here. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Undent I'm willing to compromise on the date thing, but I'd like to hear your opinion...
Click to read more »of the Muhammad Ali Dynasty. Geraldk (talk) 17:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC) (undent)Geraldk, take a look at it now and see if you want me to add anything else...
Click to read more »an acceptable compromise? Drewcifer (talk) 08:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC) (undent) No, I don't think it has anything to do with the filmographies, nor does...
Click to read more »that she is extremely thorough. Geometry guy 20:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC) (undent, sort of) Hi Veesicle! I can definitely understand your frustration with...
Click to read more »File:ID - Flores.PNG instead. DrKiernan (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC) (undent) Hi all, it looks like this has sort of settled down recently. Jan has already...
Click to read more »does, so I don't want to give up just yet. –MT 06:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC) <undent> ...Say someone drops by and makes a great proposal here, and then leaves...
Click to read more »what the page ought to say. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:11, 21 May 2010 (UTC) (undent) Just as a strawpollesque question, who here would support a guideline on...
Click to read more »website, much less Wikipedia. Wikidemo (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC) (undent) There is a guideline about signing your posts on talk pages: WP:SIGNATURE...
Click to read more »signing off on each flagging. --24.193.107.205 06:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) The issue of false positives is important. Certainly if a large majority...
Click to read more »that would be huge. -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC) (undent) Well, grin. I guess I show my age. It was during a time when folks didn't...
Click to read more »should your comments just be ignored? Chees it 17:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) I'd say "elegantly phrased for your very first post to Wikipedia", but...
Click to read more »want to try and build an OS from :D Happy‑melon 12:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC) (undent) HM:Then you have BlooP but not FlooP --Thinboy00 @242, i.e. 04:49, 23 June...
Click to read more »provide personal info. --SB_Johnny | talk 23:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC) (undent) Returning to the question at hand - unregistered users could create pages...
Click to read more »that we could easily avoid. Phil Sandifer 13:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC) (undent) You know, the simplest solution to this would be to just add a "What's...
Click to read more »entitled to make a redirect. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 08:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC) (undent) The only justification needed for a redirect is utility, that is if it...
Click to read more »pronounciations). Any thoughts?Camelbinky (talk) 03:40, 18 October 2009 (UTC) (undent) Fact: There is no one system of pronunciation that works perfectly for...
Click to read more »relevant topics. ... Misty Willows talk 08:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC) (Undent) the primary virtue of the current policy is the simplicity. It avoids arguments...
Click to read more »wrong with Beijing example, anyway? NVO (talk) 22:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC) (undent) To respond to an earlier question, Wikipedia:Requested templates is the...
Click to read more »WLU (talk) Wikipedia's rulessimple/complex 02:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC) (undent) Sometimes I wonder how much better Wikipedia could be if all the millions...
Click to read more »--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC) (undent) Good. A couple of the rows are long, but that can't really be helped. Awards...
Click to read more »best time to add the template.--Rockfang (talk) 02:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) Because it's an unnecessary edit. If the page currently has a prod template...
Click to read more »when the reports are updated. Jack forbes (talk) 19:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC) (undent) I hope are readers do not come here for the "Truth". Nothing is ever so...
Click to read more »still don't agree with it. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC) (undent)I created 2 of the articles and I will make some more tomorrow. I also submitted...
Click to read more »farmers. (Source: Wikipedia.org) ..Gnangarra 13:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC) (undent). Ok then. :-) Fixed a couple links. Your fifth link is broken, please fix...
Click to read more »assuming it's still current. -Malkinann (talk) 05:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC) (Undent) Very clearly, images not required at GA. Will look at other details now...
Click to read more »not set off by commas. --Sfmammamia (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) Semantics. Can you provide published examples from respected authors not...
Click to read more »Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 02:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) Depending on what operating system your computer runs, you may be able...
Click to read more »an emergency update? Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 15:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) Twinkle worked for my cruel master: see [3] and [4]. Hmm, should there...
Click to read more »2A02:C7D:BF19:F700:FC9E:D9E8:590E:B99F (talk) 18:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC) (undent) I really hate all those ^%&^% colons and pound signs. They always throw...
Click to read more »my head for a while. PrimeHunter2 (talk) 00:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC) (undent) Okay, testing shows I get a blank page and a 500 Internal Server Error...
Click to read more »NFL Championship Game (Super Bowl).--Truco 03:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC) (undent) Are you under the impression that coaches can win the award? Otherwise...
Click to read more »the best course of action. –Drilnoth (T • C) 01:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC) (undent) How about this? The licensing is a little complicated, since it really...
Click to read more »what the OP was thinking. Celarnor Talk to me 21:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) If we had an infinite number of editors, or an infinite amount of time...
Click to read more »stone-throwing. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) There's a large difference between a profanity-laden tirade in which one...
Click to read more »at this time. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 21:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC) (undent)Some explicit pics have "a verifiable educational rationale" in articles...
Click to read more »have been addressed. Bruce Campbell (talk) 16:55, 12 October 2012 (UTC) (undent): Indeed, now clear - it's another in the personality-rights boat, but that...
Click to read more »most entries a useless one-liner. NVO (talk) 03:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) Absolutely agree with some of your statement. I think though that that...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) So how do we find out? JohnnyMrNinja 04:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) I suggest starting a discussion on the talk page of WP:CAT, and perhaps...
Click to read more »start MediaWiki development on the side. Lupo 06:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC) (undent) An alternative would be to post this at Wikipedia:Bot requests. While getting...
Click to read more »as noted above in response. Deamon138 (talk) 14:08, 6 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) at any rate, there appears to be no consensus to return this to the guideline...
Click to read more »brace on a separate ;ine under the code it closes, then undent the next line. Other people undent the closing brace. If we're going to work on the code...
Click to read more »not politically. --Splarka (rant) 07:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC) (arbitrary undent) I just got a database locked notice while deleting stuff at CAT:CSD, and...
Click to read more »all, but thanks for the heads up--Andy Chat c 20:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC) undent. If anyone like me finds the Cacycle/wikiWatch script runs too long, an...
Click to read more »reliable sources exist. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC) (undent) Wow, Malcolm Schosha, you've picked a real tricky case as an example! I've...
Click to read more »talk 18:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC) Merge with different template Template:Undent which is much closer in expected use; something like |1=arrow. --Izno (talk)...
Click to read more »interesting stuff. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 07:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC) (Undent, same topic)... BTW, we don't use any other components of air besides oxygen...
Click to read more »part is removed X days later? LessHeard vanU 15:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC) (undent) Look at it this way. If a statement is uncontroversial, unlikely to be...
Click to read more »button to see additional messages. Mike Dillon 17:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC) (undent)Hi Mike, the message says (when I double click on the icon and hit show...
Click to read more »to MediaWiki's Bugzilla. Gary King (talk) 17:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC) (undent) Why not just use the HTTP referer to determine where the viewer came from...
Click to read more »helpful by far. THANK YOU AGAIN. Rumpsenate (talk) 00:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC) (undent). By external diff tool, I mean you can use any tool that compares two pieces...
Click to read more »(talk) — 18:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC) Can't remember template name for undenting I really am going out but haven't got there yet. Nice job Edokter. You're...
Click to read more »be taxing on WP, then I'd oppose. LaraLoveT/C 04:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC) (undent)I've recently come across this template ({{Talkback}}): Hello, Village pump...
Click to read more »Masséna's manoeuvres. may be clearer. Kirill 22:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC) [undent]Yes, that's a good idea. This one hasn't been copy-edited yet, but Battle...
Click to read more »increase the PageRank of websites. Tra (Talk) 17:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) True, but user pages still can show up relatively far up. For example,...
Click to read more »with the American one. Nm. Deamon138 (talk) 20:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC) <undent> IMDb has a spell-checker and it works just fine. Wikipedia needs one, there...
Click to read more »applying it to citations? Choor monster (talk) 19:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC) Undent. Responding to all: No, in toto. Those above clearly believe WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT...
Click to read more »regular-editing variety. John the Apostate 23:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC) (undent) You're sort of missing the point of WP:ATT if you write the article and...
Click to read more »naturally as an unforeseen consequence. EconomistBR 04:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC) [undent]I think that the discussion that prompted this section is at Wikipedia talk:Notability...
Click to read more »danger might arise, I think. Mattisse (Talk) 02:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC) <undent> The other thing is, 3RR is, as they say, "an electric fence not an entitlement"...
Click to read more »a similar colour palette. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC) (undent) I chose the colours to match as closely as I could the USGS original, bearing...
Click to read more »spell that way. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC) (undent) I'm not here. You didn't see me here, and I didn't say or do anything here...
Click to read more »wasn't notable in the past. --GoHuskies9904 (talk) 22:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC) undent:Okay, that wasn't an attack. Just a question. And no I will not go through...
Click to read more »photographs for Olympic athletes? Colin°Talk 15:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC) (undent, re to Colin) no, I don't think so. We do have publicity FPs (off the top...
Click to read more »template-limits. --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC) undent: I have already provided the obvious work around for the COVID cases, which...
Click to read more »banned as disruptive). Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC) (undent) I think the point of all of this discussion (and many others that I've...
Click to read more »coverage exist for this one? Edison (talk) 04:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC) (undent) This really isn't the best place to discuss whether or not Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »that civility is bad. --Iantresman (talk) 20:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC) (undent) I'm thinking we should delist WP:CIVIL as a pillar if no one actually expects...
Click to read more »the article, happy holidays! Apterygial 07:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC) (undent)I left one note above, but other than that I'm ready to support. Surprising...
Click to read more »binding for the text — because it could be ancillary to the image. (The {{Undent}} template does not suffice here.) — JamesEG (talk) 03:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article i have seen in years. Moxy (talk) 08:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC) [undent]Comment - The "Ethnoburb vs. Chinatown" article provided as a "reference"...
Click to read more »queries, as they say). --Midnightdreary (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC) (undent) My (very slightly different) version of the lede is temporarily in my user...
Click to read more »a purely commercial view. Pedro : Chat 19:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC) (undent) My own personal opinion is that I am fine with the concept of professional...
Click to read more »listen to your opinions). WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC) (Undent)Jayron, you said above: "The person who wins should always be the person...
Click to read more »would like to join that discussion. Kelly hi! 21:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC) <undent>See this entry in the casebook at Commons. Basically, murals are considered...
Click to read more »rather...startled. :p --Silversmith Hewwo 02:21, 3 November 2009 (UTC) [undent] Ahh, I see. Lots of identical bunnies. Ah well, if you get any other bunnies...
Click to read more »think there's anything pending. Chick Bowen 14:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC) (undent) If you believe the issues to be resolved, please ping the editors who have...
Click to read more »standard question from now on. User:Dorftrottel 01:00, February 14, 2008 <Undent> I checked Dorftrottel's talk page very carefully before not thanking him...
Click to read more »almost all of them). Giants2008 (17-14) 17:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC) (undent) Two problems here: First, you took the remarks too personally. I don't...
Click to read more »list and checking it again. Someguy1221 (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC) (undent) I too wish for a simple way to copy and paste wikilinks in one step. For...
Click to read more »satisfy what you're asking for. --Moni3 (talk) 13:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC) (undent) I suggest something like the ff: Rumors circulated that French women warmly...
Click to read more »if you think it's useful. jimfbleak (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) I'm not the bird guy here :-) I defer to your wisdom, as always. :-) I...
Click to read more »did anything wrong. Anythingyouwant (talk) 13:37, 11 August 2012 (UTC) (Undent)These are the Bruning reversion instances that I'm pointing to: this by...
Click to read more »that the user is a sockpuppet.--Yolgnu (talk) 09:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) - Another thought has crossed my mind. After having checked up on things...
Click to read more »more, which would be a Good Thing, no? Willow 10:45, 27 July 2007 (UTC) (undent) Comment: In response to Willow's comments, we added a new super-top-level...
Click to read more »summarizes material elsewhere. Geometry guy 20:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) I made some more substantive edits in an attempt to address the concerns...
Click to read more »isn't appropriate for an AfD. — xDanielxTalk 03:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC) <undent>Comment I'm echoing Fred Hsu - the page as is, is bogus, and all the references...
Click to read more »what-have-you in Britain. Deepmath (talk) 00:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC) (undent) I'm honestly not sure what part of my attitude makes me seem like a criminal...
Click to read more »Rules" right next to that. TommyKirchhoff (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC) (undent) I think it vitally important to recognize the traffic Athletics (overview)...
Click to read more »photographs for Olympic athletes? Colin°Talk 15:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC) (undent, re to Colin) no, I don't think so. We do have publicity FPs (off the top...
Click to read more »pointing me to that page. -Severa (!!!) 19:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC) (undent)FYI, I am not going to respond to Severa here. For discussion of the Harris...
Click to read more »Vanity Fair piece) -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 11:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC) (undent) Yes, but the DN interviewer is the one who called it "killing" and that...
Click to read more »consider this concern resolved. Kelly hi! 21:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC) (undenting a bit) Yes, Silverman gives the artist's name... it's been there since...
Click to read more »what made you think I did. --Chealer (talk) 04:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC) <undent>Let me expand on my reasoning a bit more here. (1) Of course many men, and...
Click to read more »all of these meet WP:BIO. Johnbod (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) It is anachronistic to apply the definition of a 21st century artist to...
Click to read more »so I need to go home.. Ling.Nut (talk) 14:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC) (undent). OK. :-) I guess the underlying point of some of my stuff above was simply...
Click to read more »'buggy browsers' mean IE, or what? Algebraist 04:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC) (undent): No... not really. It sort of happens a bit in all browsers, I suspect...
Click to read more »this one in the past. -Marcusmax(speak) 23:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC) (undent)Fair enough and I trust your faith 100% in your statement, but I think that...
Click to read more »should feel free to archive. --Deskana (talk) 22:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC) (undent) Added one more suspect sock that came up in discussion today. Before this...
Click to read more »encyclopedia) but it'll work for now. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC) (UNDENT) Ok, all Britannica references are removed. I also added some new sources...
Click to read more »divisive? Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 16:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC) (undent) Hey, the crusades were justified via Christianity. Same deal.. abuse of...
Click to read more »June 2008 (UTC) Thanks. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC) (undent) Now at AfD. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC) All are deleted...
Click to read more »any of them are reliable sources though. Corpx 07:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC) (undent) Reliability seems to be an issue with that search, however I did provide...
Click to read more »it pretty easy to spot copyvios. - Sorfane 14:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) I know it would be more work, but it sounds like one way to handle this...
Click to read more »expanding is no hurry. --Apoc2400 (talk) 16:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC) (undent) The original discussion was about the page Wikipedia:Requests for expansion...
Click to read more »WHO says it... --Jayron32|talk|contribs 18:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) One more thing I thought of. It is by NO MEANS required, but you may want...
Click to read more »all of these meet WP:BIO. Johnbod (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) It is anachronistic to apply the definition of a 21st century artist to...
Click to read more »has done something wrong, and is therefore libellous. Harry the Dog WOOF (undent) You have based your line of argument on very shaky ground. This young lady...
Click to read more »rule violation. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 21:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC) (undent)As a point of information, please note that Checkuser has determined that...
Click to read more »something from your experiences. Davidlud (talk) 04:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) If you are interested in the impact of requiring logins for creating new...
Click to read more »should probably be restored. -- Quiddity (talk) 21:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC) (undent) 1. I'll doublecheck OCP at your insistence. I had recalled that more sourcing...
Click to read more »Thanks for all of your help. --Banime (talk) 14:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) Excellent. First, I am not an expert on MILHIST's process: but, this type...
Click to read more »splitting last, not first. Phil Sandifer (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC) (undent) Kww, I think a good way to view the argument is this: let's say we have...
Click to read more »disagree! Funny that, isn't it? Rehevkor ✉ 03:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC) {undent}You're of course free to "disagree." But it doesn't fail WP:MUSIC, it doesn't...
Click to read more »above kind of comments being made. --Barberio 11:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) When you point to what you consider a problem, would you mind using a diff...
Click to read more »"tools for the arsenal." --69.226.103.13 (talk) 19:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC) (undent, to answer a few). CR, calling it a "tool" is probably much better. Still...
Click to read more »Thank you in advance.Smallman12q (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC) (undent) Basically, fair use isn't good enough for living people. Specifically,...
Click to read more »requirements we put on all the other? Trebor 20:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Undent* Red Herring argument. Who is saying it's exempt? Not I said the duck. However...
Click to read more »been said that she is a valuable source? Fram 21:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Undent. Oh I understand it quite clearly, as it's been discussed ad absurdum in...
Click to read more »songs-related deletion discussions. —TexasAndroid (talk) 15:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC) (undent) I Feel this article should stay as it is and shouldnt be redirected to...
Click to read more »really make sense historically. --Nlu (talk) 07:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC) (undent) Keep Notable element of ROTK. Ling.Nut 11:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Keep These...
Click to read more »comments on it) reeks of it. --Matt Lewis (talk) 01:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC) [UNDENT]You're still hung up on the idea that the purpose of the article is to prove...
Click to read more »sourced article. Fences and windows (talk) 01:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Comment (undent) Can you point to a reliable source that describes his work as a psychic...
Click to read more »just us three involved editors. Equazcion •✗/C • 08:23, 10 Apr 2008 (UTC) (undent)I'm also not going to continue this for now, and let other editors comment...
Click to read more »Mormons and non-Mormons alike. Reswobslc 03:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC) (undent) The POV of Mormons is not more important simply because the article in...
Click to read more »its course.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC) (undent)Ok, there are accusations of bias and stalking going on here, both of which...
Click to read more »example and let all see what to do here.--יודל 00:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC) (undent) Gladly. Nearly 60,000 GHITS. Deleted six times. Over 86k GHITS. Deleted...
Click to read more »raised. As I did before. ++Lar: t/c 01:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC) (We should undent soon if there is much more of this.) I didn't say that I found your comments...
Click to read more »interested in knowing about. --98.217.14.211 (talk) 16:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC) (undent) Thank you to the above, as for downgrading PHP, I tried that, however it's...
Click to read more »its course.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC) (undent)Ok, there are accusations of bias and stalking going on here, both of which...
Click to read more »example and let all see what to do here.--יודל 00:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC) (undent) Gladly. Nearly 60,000 GHITS. Deleted six times. Over 86k GHITS. Deleted...
Click to read more »definitions used in that guideline. ArakunemTalk 20:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC) {Undent} I am afraid I disagree. From what little I can see past the pay-walls the...
Click to read more »and then wait a few seconds. --Splarka (rant) 10:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) Thanks! I tested it out on a couple articles, and it seems to do a great...
Click to read more »Tri-Cities either. -Pete (talk) Done -Pete (talk) 17:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) Had to delve into the Google cache for some reason, but: Tri-Cities [1]...
Click to read more »users left! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC) (undent) To the original poster: the pages linked under WP:EIW#Dispute detail Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »article i have seen in years. Moxy (talk) 08:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC) [undent]Comment - The "Ethnoburb vs. Chinatown" article provided as a "reference"...
Click to read more »some does relate to the article. I'm fine with you collapsing back to the undent 8 comments before yours though, the one by Rod that starts "If only you'd...
Click to read more »it hard to understand your position. Wrad 17:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC) (undent) Well, where should I start? There really isn't any need for name-calling...
Click to read more »disagree with it? -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 17:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) It's a skewed biased guideline because only two or three people were part...
Click to read more »be exempted from those guidelines? --Phirazo 04:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC) (undent) Please do not utilize strawmen. I am not arguing in favor of all and any...
Click to read more »wasn't notable in the past. --GoHuskies9904 (talk) 22:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC) undent:Okay, that wasn't an attack. Just a question. And no I will not go through...
Click to read more »growl if I'm wrong please. Drmies (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC) [Undent] Comment: Well, Mr. Davi, you say that your blog "clearly meats" (sic.)...
Click to read more »citations to show that this is the case.Slp1 03:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC) (undent) One factor to consider is exactly what the book is being used as a source...
Click to read more »guidelines, with consensus, in WP:RS? bsrboy (talk) 12:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC) (undent)Comment I challenge that this is not a WP:RS, since the source is the BBC...
Click to read more »don't already know myself. Awadewit | talk 05:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC) (Undent) I'm not sure I agree with most of your suggestions for section headings...
Click to read more »an encyclopedia. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC) (undent)If the primary concern here is "protecting the innocent" then we should...
Click to read more »for visiting the article.Ferrylodge (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC) (undent) The stuff I put in the footnote simply said, "The authors of the study...
Click to read more »how you verify citations. ScienceApe (talk) 02:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC) (undent) I know quite well all of this. My entire point is that the only independent...
Click to read more »on this particular topic). --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 06:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Undent - I agree it's a very interesting policy/editor question. In the two cases...
Click to read more »June 2007 (UTC) Yes. Exactly. MastCell Talk 16:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC) (undent)As a note, I could have attempted to hide it, if I wanted to. I chose not...
Click to read more »of the Muhammad Ali Dynasty. Geraldk (talk) 17:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC) (undent)Geraldk, take a look at it now and see if you want me to add anything else...
Click to read more »sourced article. Fences and windows (talk) 01:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Comment (undent) Can you point to a reliable source that describes his work as a psychic...
Click to read more »showed they know better now. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:47, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) Why do you care if your user log shows some blocks? I.e., what specifically...
Click to read more »disagree with it? -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 17:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) It's a skewed biased guideline because only two or three people were part...
Click to read more »considered the "highest level". Mosmof (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC) (undent for readability) I think the way I am reading WP:ATH is the most clear-cut...
Click to read more »point to where this is stated? Quadzilla99 02:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC) (undent) Oops, I was half wrong. :-) Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment...
Click to read more »the fair use image. Done Happyme22 (talk) 16:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC) (undent)Why doesn't the toolbox at the top right of this page include spell check...
Click to read more »than one fixed size for all users. --Ideogram 18:44, 22 April 2007 (UTC) (undent) Thanks, I didn't. :-) I was looking into all the ins and outs of images...
Click to read more »some does relate to the article. I'm fine with you collapsing back to the undent 8 comments before yours though, the one by Rod that starts "If only you'd...
Click to read more »anyone who cares to).Bali ultimate (talk) 04:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC) (Undent) To address a single issue: The "letter to the editor from the same source...
Click to read more »for your feedback. Best, -- twelsht (talk) 20:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) I feel a need to point out that the opposed reviewer has not responded...
Click to read more »the subject interesting? Alastairward (talk) 22:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC) (undent) Well I've said my bit already. The game was published in a widely read...
Click to read more »that decision. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC) (undent) It doesn't deserve to languish in GAC for a month. If one of y'all would...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC) (undent) Keep This phrase is distinguished from creationism and has particular meaning...
Click to read more »course. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 20:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC) (Undent) I have moved the Lovesey pdf lecture to the external links section, it...
Click to read more »coverage exist for this one? Edison (talk) 04:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC) (undent) This really isn't the best place to discuss whether or not Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »based on a hunch? —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) You're rewording my statement. Not opposition, not a hunch. Leaning opposition...
Click to read more »reliability of the Bruin. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 00:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC) (undent)I've a question. Apparently what I felt was a violation of NPOV wasn't in...
Click to read more »article a quick read.Anythingyouwant (talk) 21:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC) (Undent)Okay, I know you have been waiting in suspense for my comments. :-) I'll...
Click to read more »entitled to make a redirect. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 08:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC) (undent) The only justification needed for a redirect is utility, that is if it...
Click to read more »letter of your username.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) I agree with Franamax about the Help desk. I have never seen another technical...
Click to read more »luck sorting it out. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC) (undent) One day I'm gonna be off-wiki for a couple weeks, come back, and some self-anointed...
Click to read more »new information to write about). —David Levy 06:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC) (undent) Those are all valid points, but why privilege the passing one type of super-notable...
Click to read more »intended to goad you... ;-) Ðiliff «» (Talk) 16:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC) [undent] How dare you use evidence and my own words against me, that insults me...
Click to read more »WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 20:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Undent. I've done considerable trimming - the page was rife with original research...
Click to read more »Rules" right next to that. TommyKirchhoff (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC) (undent) I think it vitally important to recognize the traffic Athletics (overview)...
Click to read more »how you verify citations. ScienceApe (talk) 02:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC) (undent) I know quite well all of this. My entire point is that the only independent...
Click to read more »that's awesome! Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 16:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) I know, this may be pointless, as this BRFA appears to have dropped off...
Click to read more »holding up the verifiability. --TrollHistorian 21:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) Not knowing this area of publishing, I ask you seriously if you think everything...
Click to read more »not by bluster or threats. Brianboulton (talk) 21:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC) (UNDENT) I didn't see this discussion earlier as I posted notes on the talk pages...
Click to read more »the original request. Thanks, Verbal chat 17:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC) (undent) Food Chemical News appears to be a reliable source in the ordinary sense...
Click to read more »article somewhere locally. -- Arvind (talk) 23:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC) (undent)Blueboar, the issue is not so much that the stuff on the site is 'unsourced'...
Click to read more »already well-elaborated? SparsityProblem 23:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC) (undent)It is painfully obvious (to me at least) that this CFD will be closed as...
Click to read more »religiosity. My post was awkward. ៛ Bielle (talk) 01:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC) (undent) I agree that correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation, and that...
Click to read more »technology start-up.</ref> --JayHenry (talk) 01:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) I moved the "Available data" up to the history section. I'd think some...
Click to read more »about 5 or 10 years from now? MastCell Talk 03:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC) (undent) I think there are two truly legitimate keep rationales that I've seen....
Click to read more »a long while. Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC) (undent) How are things coming on this? Do those editors who supported the FAR still...
Click to read more »experts, you can bet. --Relata refero (disp.) 15:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) We can't crack down hard enough on groups like this. I'd support immediate...
Click to read more »Probably shouldn't be in the lede. THF (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC) (Undent) I was able to find a few sources making the claim that were not just the...
Click to read more »creation per these diaries. --MASEM (t) 18:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC) (undent) Aha! The new paragraphs give me much more confidence that the article meets...
Click to read more »with links to the subpages. —teb728 t c 09:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) There might be a similar problem with Economy of the United States, which...
Click to read more »isn't appropriate for an AfD. — xDanielxTalk 03:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC) <undent>Comment I'm echoing Fred Hsu - the page as is, is bogus, and all the references...
Click to read more »and abusive puppetmaster. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 21:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) CC, there are reasons that CU's are carefully chosen, I'd imagine that...
Click to read more »consensus to have it turned on, right now. Chzz ► 01:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC) (undent) And there is no 2/3 consensus to have it turned off. Thus here we are....
Click to read more »uk/dna/h2g2/A218882 —— Shakescene (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC) (undent) I mostly tend to translate "altum" as lofty since that's the way the root...
Click to read more »all around today! — BQZip01 — talk 20:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC) (partial undent)The statements on the page when it came to MfD made it hard to AGF, it stated...
Click to read more »definitions used in that guideline. ArakunemTalk 20:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC) {Undent} I am afraid I disagree. From what little I can see past the pay-walls the...
Click to read more »songs) I had added them in. σмgнgσмg(talk) 01:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC) (Undent)Well then why are there still a ton of blank cells in the other charted...
Click to read more »than split infinitives. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 15:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC) (undent) Anyway, back to whom. :) How appropriate in spoken English? Lazulilasher...
Click to read more »specificly applied for logos. Martijn Hoekstra 17:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC) (undent) Let's not forget to mention the page: Wikipedia:Why was my article deleted...
Click to read more »to include East Kildonan. – ukexpat (talk) 16:53, 22 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates compares the various...
Click to read more »as well as in the article. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC) (undent)I have fixed both and added another source. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation...
Click to read more »around, however, thank goodness.Griswaldo (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC) Undent. How do people think about the following summary of the discussion? Although...
Click to read more »be good to make separate edits. SPhilbrickT 23:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC) (undent) Are you thinking about the three revert rule? --Teratornis (talk) 02:43...
Click to read more »can the editors fix that? Awadewit | talk 01:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC) (undent) I noticed that you checked off your concerns on Talk, both the factual...
Click to read more »A big regret, sorry about that. Lradrama 19:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC) (undent)Geez, there but for the grace of God, etc. . . If that's all it takes to...
Click to read more »growl if I'm wrong please. Drmies (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC) [Undent] Comment: Well, Mr. Davi, you say that your blog "clearly meats" (sic.)...
Click to read more »holding up the verifiability. --TrollHistorian 21:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC) (undent) Not knowing this area of publishing, I ask you seriously if you think everything...
Click to read more »it out. Thank you! --HappyInGeneral (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2009 (UTC) (undent) I got a response from wsj.com: "Wall Street Journal Online subscribers...
Click to read more »respond to civil counter-arguments. Geo Swan 23:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC) (undent} You are free to choose which of my arguments warrant a response. If I make...
Click to read more »Tks, KAVBEAR. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 19:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC) (undent) Sigismund I the Old, king of Poland, and his second wife Bona Sforza were...
Click to read more »notice the inconsistencies. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC) (undent) They look fine to me. But I don't see any examples to check. Maury (talk)...
Click to read more »Seems good now. Trial away :) Martinp23 21:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) If there was a restriction on the types of CSDs it could do, I think it...
Click to read more »lending credence to a flawed argument. Trusilver 16:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC) (undent) I personally would hold that ubx accountable in an RFA. That kind of "all...
Click to read more »sources. I beg your pardon. --Laser brain (talk) 20:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) No offense taken! Maury (talk) 20:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Comment. I found...
Click to read more »to a different article. Brianboulton (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC) (undent) Support. That was my last reservation: I was wondering if some modern consequences...
Click to read more »but your prognosis does not look good. TNXMan 22:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC) (undent) Wikipedia makes the Real World obsolete, and the sooner everyone realizes...
Click to read more »Spain's railroad network! JonCatalan (talk) 21:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC) (undent) You see? Aren't you glad I asked? Maury (talk) 11:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »things would be appreciated. Montanabw(talk) 22:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC) (undent) You should start by reading WP:PROJGUIDE, but cleaning up a disastrous...
Click to read more »powered cars. --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 18:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC) Undent - thank you, excellent answers as always :) 213.161.190.228 (talk) 07:20...
Click to read more »citation at least per paragraph. Drewcifer 02:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC) (undent) Maury, two things: First and foremost, I'm OK with this article as GA....
Click to read more »We're saying its not a snowjob. Atropos 22:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC) (undent) Yes, everyone agrees it's not WP:SNOW. On the other hand, I've not seen...
Click to read more »one of the Guides like Mignot. Johnbod (talk) 01:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC) (undent) hi johnbod, thanks for taking the time and replying. I was busy real-world...
Click to read more »local libraries. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 16:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC) (undent) Strictly speaking, the teacher's original claim has an incorrect connotation...
Click to read more »"journalist" in their evidence. John Vandenberg (chat) 12:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC) <undent> I've only looked at the Picard affair, in which Cla68 says he was commenting...
Click to read more »not used in the East.--Shantavira|feed me 07:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC) (undent) That's Thai pronunciation, which may not be similar (Thai is Sanskrit-influenced...
Click to read more »rule violation. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 21:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC) (undent)As a point of information, please note that Checkuser has determined that...
Click to read more »have not changed their names. SDY (talk) 23:40, 20 October 2009 (UTC) (undent) As a side note, there is a cemetery and memorial for the Oise-Aisne campaign...
Click to read more »an acceptable compromise? Drewcifer (talk) 08:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC) (undent) No, I don't think it has anything to do with the filmographies, nor does...
Click to read more »considered the "highest level". Mosmof (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC) (undent for readability) I think the way I am reading WP:ATH is the most clear-cut...
Click to read more »tried to make an encyclopedia, actually). —Giggy 00:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC) <undent>As Jimbo has pointed out (where I can't remember) adminship has become a...
Click to read more »single-point-of-failure might miss, etc. Alai 02:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC) (undent) I'm not saying that going back to the board style is perfect, but it would...
Click to read more »is the one I've got [2] DuncanHill (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC) undent Yes, looks like it's much better value. Seems the SSD ones are aimed a bit...
Click to read more »won't over-simplify a complex task. Anomie⚔ 03:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC) (undent), okay, some sample code: Once again, I haven't actually tested this code...
Click to read more »appears that policy agrees with me. IvoShandor 09:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC) (undent) Kinda sorta. IvoShandor 09:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC) I think you are misreading...
Click to read more »Or the other way round. Fainites barleyscribs 22:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC) (undent) Oppose this. It is "something to live down to" rather than "something to...
Click to read more »be a good time to start. Daniel Case (talk) 17:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC) (undent) Firstly, thank you for addressing the images with licensing issues; that...
Click to read more »about 5 or 10 years from now? MastCell Talk 03:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC) (undent) I think there are two truly legitimate keep rationales that I've seen....
Click to read more »transformations together? --Tango (talk) 01:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) Would you find it easier to geometrically interpret the mean of two vectors...
Click to read more »NFCC#8, which it doesn't. MickMacNee (talk) 19:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) Whatever, I'm not going to war over it. I've emailed the club in an attempt...
Click to read more »the wikisearch program can grasp. --Kjoonlee 17:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC) (undent)Now that the Wikimedia Foundation has some money, maybe Wikipedia will finally...
Click to read more »articles to look the same? Wasted Time R (talk) 02:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC) (undent)I have not made up my mind, and was interested in hearing what others might...
Click to read more »few navboxes (e.g., FOXP2). Boghog2 (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC) (undent) You might find something useful under: WP:EIW#Querie. For example, I wonder...
Click to read more »work on the article.[2] SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC) (undent)BoP, following up on what Sandy said: because FAR is supposed to be a place...
Click to read more »dismissed in the article. --Insider201283 (talk) 14:22, 4 May 2010 (UTC) (undent) You said "email the UK." We're in a dispute because you previously asked...
Click to read more »man!" Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 08:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC) (undent) Perhaps when teenagers grow up, and have to write things to a standard...
Click to read more »forte is programming :) —— Eagle101Need help? 01:37, 18 March 2008 (UTC) (undent) I would say take a look here. If ever you find two tags from different...
Click to read more »sub-sub-(etc)-categories as well. Thanks! shoy 02:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC) (undent) Pretty much every higher-level programming language either has native support...
Click to read more »Kansas Turnpike. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC) (undent) It seems to me then that to satisfy JC's objection and remove his opposition...
Click to read more »the first para into two!!! --TraceyR (talk) 22:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC) (Undent) No, if a number is in a quote then it stays unconverted, don't think there...
Click to read more »pretending not to be able to understand. --Jayron32 15:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC) <undent> "That the Two Kingdoms of Scotland and England shall upon the first day...
Click to read more »a particular scale. Edith Sirius Lee (talk) 16:04, 30 July 2010 (UTC) (undent) Have started a RfC here [37] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:04...
Click to read more »them responsibly... Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 04:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC) (undent) Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles may be useful to get some general context...
Click to read more »of the biographical information. Shii (tock) 20:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC) (undent) I downloaded some articles about Basho from JSTOR. Email me if you want...
Click to read more »contrary to policy. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC) (Undent reply to Septentrionalis and Johnbod) Okay I've read over your arguments...
Click to read more »as established by the source? SageRad (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC) Undent, science is generally an RS, though not neccessarily every opinion piece...
Click to read more »entropy to run its course. SpinningSpark 22:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC) (undent)However original you all think you have been . . . YouTube was there first...
Click to read more »will likely be a couple of months.) Kelly hi! 20:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC) <undent> Apparently this is the permission e-mail, which only re-affirms the noncommercial...
Click to read more »spell that way. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC) (undent) I'm not here. You didn't see me here, and I didn't say or do anything here...
Click to read more »automatically forced one into existence. BrainyBabe 09:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC) (undent) Wikimedia software isn't programmed to do that (I'm not sure where you...
Click to read more »comments on it) reeks of it. --Matt Lewis (talk) 01:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC) [UNDENT]You're still hung up on the idea that the purpose of the article is to prove...
Click to read more »characterization of the incident. HG | Talk 13:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) hey, I clearly interpreted this as "take yourself and your 'drama' off...
Click to read more »going to say that. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC) (undent) If you want to add links to all your user subpages and their talk pages...
Click to read more »insignificant part of their lives. Kane5187 (talk) 06:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC) [undent] There are definitely large category trees that don't fit in well with the...
Click to read more »a great admirer of Lane's.--Wehwalt (talk) 17:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC) (undent). Good. To be honest, I think the newspapers are just repeating fluff that...
Click to read more »possible or even likely outcome. Orderinchaos 05:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC) Undent. I'd say exchanges like this User_talk:Katie1971#Adoption, User_talk:RyRy5#Adoption_3...
Click to read more »etc. is all available. — BQZip01 — talk 01:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC) (undent) On a stretch here, but: Army websites would use Official Military Photos...
Click to read more »Thanks for being so patient. Graham Colm Talk 17:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC) (Undent) It has been standard practice for quite awhile to place the gameplay section...
Click to read more »tightening up the lead - cheers. --Merbabu (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC) (undent) Mangojuice, I believe you are mistaken about the purpose of the lead; it...
Click to read more »(journalist) than here. Mathsci (talk) 03:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC) (partial undent) It appears Dbachmann merged the Tyr (journal) article into Michael Moynihan...
Click to read more »here, the closure was wrong. ShoesssS Talk 02:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC) (undent) Thing is, as has been pointed out previously, AFDs are there to create...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Image use policy. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC) (undent) To comment further on the possibility of recovering your user name, if...
Click to read more »