Redirect to:
July 2011 (UTC) The code is missing the removal of the (optional) {{userspacedraft}} template on the moved pages. mabdul 19:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC) Approved...
Click to read more »supported by this statement by the denying administrator: "See WP:AFC or WP:USERSPACEDRAFT for your way forward."). Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 10:16, 28 November...
Click to read more »Haraldseth (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) A user has created userspacedrafts about his friends, who will never become notable, violating WP:NOTWEBHOST...
Click to read more »Help:Userspace draft, in order to be consistent with the target of Wikipedia:USERSPACEDRAFT. Thoughts? —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Retarget per...
Click to read more »63 (talk) 07:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC) Support I would like to join. WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 20:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC) Support this would...
Click to read more »{{Userspace}}, {{Userspace Draft}}, {{Userspace Draft article}}, {{Userspace drafts}}, {{Userspace-draft}}, {{Userspacedraft}}, {{Userwip}}, {{WorkInProgress}}...
Click to read more »meet the requirements for Wikipedia. I would suggest creating a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, and then checking with the deleting admin before proceeding (✉→BWilkins←✎)...
Click to read more »horrifically self-promotional. A registered user would be fine creating a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, trying to meet Wikipedia requirements, but they should have it reviewed...
Click to read more »for both of those reasons. Your best choice would be to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT that can conquer all the reasons it was deleted (talk→ BWilkins ←track)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete all delete all the empty categories that contained that userspacedraft. wrong capitalization in this case, extreme ambiguity for "frameworks"...
Click to read more »then decline it) 'shrinking' the old decline messages removing all {{userspacedraft}}, {{userspace draft}}, {{user sandbox}} from the submission cleanup...
Click to read more »significance of the subject.. It may be possible for you to write a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, but it sure cannot be promotional like this one was (talk→ BWilkins ←track)...
Click to read more »did a quick check and found that he was nomming dozens of untouched userspacedrafts for MFD ... some of which had not been touched since 2009. Not sure...
Click to read more »prefix - for example, User:Chzz/test. You can make such pages using WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. I moved the page to just Duane Hopkins. Overall, it looks OK; certainly...
Click to read more »reason". If you have no time to finish it you're best off creating a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. I try to be always friendly to new users, but not when messages like...
Click to read more »should never have been in articlespace. That should have remained a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT until it was ready-to-go, which will take a lot of work. Bad judgement...
Click to read more »comment on the sock issue. It has been suggested that you create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT of the article you wish to create. A simple copy/paste of what's on...
Click to read more »to Student B fixing the formatting; Student A should just head to WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, create a page, write their text there, and save it. Student B could...
Click to read more »fathom how it meets basic requirements to even have been created as a userspacedraft, let alone a live article ... no comment on the behaviours of WJE yet...
Click to read more »- this page is a copyright violation. You are welcome to make a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, but please verify with the deleting admin before moving it to articlespace...
Click to read more »it off. Shouldn't we 'pre-populate' it with a header, similar to {{userspacedraft}}, if it does not exist yet? Chzz ► 00:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for the basic requirements for an article to remain. See WP:AFC or WP:USERSPACEDRAFT for your way forward. Do no try to argue that a basically blank article...
Click to read more »other countrys--Vvven (talk) 16:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC) Userfy to a userspacedraft location -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC) Delete I'm...
Click to read more »changed Experienced user still will be able to move the page; neither the userspacedraft-template nor the move link in the head-row will be removed The backlog...
Click to read more »recommend using the articles for creation process, or writing a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, and having the "article" checked by someone before trying to resubmit...
Click to read more »now to User:PeterLFlomPhD/Gateway School of New York, & tagged as {{userspacedraft}}. You hadn't put it in your sandbox, as you hadn't preceded the title...
Click to read more »significant piece. Are you sure it's not just easier to create a new WP:USERSPACEDRAFT? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC) Thomas James Ball...
Click to read more »should never be created in articlespace, but should have begun as a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or article for creation the panda ɛˢˡ” 11:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Porticor...
Click to read more »supported by this statement by the denying administrator: "See WP:AFC or WP:USERSPACEDRAFT for your way forward."). Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 10:16, 28 November...
Click to read more »are apparent in the article as it was. Perhaps you can generate a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT that is appropriate. I also hope you do not have WP:COI (✉→BWilkins←✎)...
Click to read more »that if you create an account, they will undelete the contents to a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT where you can continue to work on it. That offer still stands, as the...
Click to read more »'Autoluminescent'? Thanking you in anticipation. A registered user can create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, or an unregistered user can start an article for creation (talk→ BWilkins ←track)...
Click to read more »version, and if you choose to try and draft something, use either a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or WP:AFC DP 12:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC) That American Life · ( talk | logs...
Click to read more »this will NOT be undeleted. If someone wishes to use WP:AFC or a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT then start from scratch. That will not be undeleted in any form the...
Click to read more »articles in "live" articlespace. Use the WP:AFC process, or create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. Only functional, sourced, valid articles should be in articlespace...
Click to read more »article to prevent recreation. If you feel that you can create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT that is sourced properly, please do so - but request assistance from...
Click to read more »project in last September/October by placing a submit button on every {{userspacedraft}} and increase the new submissions every day from former ~60 to over...
Click to read more »See WP:PROMO and WP:CORP for vital information. You may attempt a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, and create the article there following guidelines, and ask for it to...
Click to read more »30 October 2012 (UTC) Not done Your best bet would be to make a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or use the articles for creation tool. When it's ready, you can either...
Click to read more »it was deleted in Sep 2011. It may be possible for you create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT but you would need to satisfy the requirements to prove notability -...
Click to read more »should never have been in articlespace. That should have remained a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT until it was ready-to-go, which will take a lot of work. Bad judgement...
Click to read more »the potential article prior to moving it into articlespace. See WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC) File:Adam Elliot...
Click to read more »article reads of a lot of WP:PUFFERY and original research. As a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT is to be temporary, and still belongs to Wikipedia, could you advise...
Click to read more »indeed find suitable sources, please either create a new WP:AFC or a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT the panda ₯’ 23:00, 20 May 2014 (UTC) Proxy Robotics · ( talk | logs...
Click to read more »do not keep pages up for "book reviews to be added" ... was it a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Tyler Bunz · ( talk | logs...
Click to read more »fails to meet encyclopedic requirements. You may wish to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or use the WP:AFC process, however, do not include copyrighted materials...
Click to read more »proceed with re-creating an article such as this - preferably as a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. Indeed, the deleting admin has been excessively helpful in guiding...
Click to read more »wording, and must therefore be deleted. You're welcome to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, but be sure to get some advice before trying to move it back into article...
Click to read more »information would be well out-of-date. You're welcome to create a wP:USERSPACEDRAFT or use the articles for creation process (✉→BWilkins←✎) 17:51, 16 July...
Click to read more »as opposed to an encyclopedic article. You're welcome to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT at some point when reliable sources become available (talk→ BWilkins ←track)...
Click to read more »lead to an immediate speedy deletion. If someone wants to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, and bring it up to a point where it completely meets all requirements...
Click to read more »age, you might be better off creating an article from scratch as a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC) Rambhau Mhalgi Prabodhini...
Click to read more »to deletion, and so forth. You can make such pages with the link WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. You may also find this link useful: Wikipedia:Advice for younger editors...
Click to read more »should never have been in articlespace. That should have remained a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT until it was ready-to-go, which will take a lot of work. Bad judgement...
Click to read more »