This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
userbox) instead of creating a category group. Shortcut WP:USERCATYESWP:USERCATYES Quite simply, a user category is appropriate if it has the capacity to...
Click to read more »20 August 2020 (UTC) Comment, potential grounds for deletion are WP:USERCATYES and WP:NOTSOCIAL (3rd bullet point). Before making up my mind I would...
Click to read more »subpages that are draft versions of articles. Shortcut WP:USERCATYESWP:USERCATYES Quite simply, a user category is appropriate if it has the capacity to...
Click to read more »John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC) It falls under WP:USERCATYES, an established Wikipedia policy, as a user category that groups similar...
Click to read more »people think they are not included in anything in WP:USERCATYES and so should not be allowed. USERCATYES does not attempt to be all inclusive ("Some examples")...
Click to read more »between the two. I feel like this category follows the guidelines at WP:USERCATYES, "Categories which group users by knowledge or understanding of a topic"...
Click to read more »right now. Vanilla Wizard 💙 19:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:USERCATYES. In my opinion this category is totally fine per Appropriate types of...
Click to read more »certain user categories are frequently kept at CfD despite failing WP:USERCATYES and meeting WP:USERCATNO (the purpose of user categories is to categorise...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: This user category fails WP:USERCATYES. This category belongs to the type of Inappropriate types of user categories#Categories...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) Weak keep deleted I find nothing here that is promoted by WP:USERCATYES, and find the arguments that WP:USERCATNO applies somewhat but not conclusively...
Click to read more »RevelationDirect (talk) 01:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC) On balance, the guidelines at WP:USERCATYES expand on the requisite goal of collaboration in saying: "Quite simply...
Click to read more »important and widespread enough to be properly handled via an RfC to amend WP:USERCATYES and WP:USERCATNO, and spell out whether categories such as Category:Queer...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) Weak keep deleted I find nothing here that is promoted by WP:USERCATYES, and find the arguments that WP:USERCATNO applies somewhat but not conclusively...
Click to read more »important and widespread enough to be properly handled via an RfC to amend WP:USERCATYES and WP:USERCATNO, and spell out whether categories such as Category:Queer...
Click to read more »