Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
are not categorised as user template pages themselves. Shortcut WP:UBCRWP:UBCR All userboxes are governed by the civility policy. Userboxes must not include...
Click to read more »organization is a pretty clear WP:UBCR violation. Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR. Sigh. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:27...
Click to read more »Template:UBX/Female chauvinist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:UBCR, Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive. See also Wikipedia...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Goes against WP:UBCR by promoting a highly divisive ideology that has killed hundreds of thousands...
Click to read more »Russian swastika (see The Independent or The Telegraph, for example), while WP:UBCR forbids userboxes that are inflammatory. Wikisaurus (talk) 08:51, 14 March...
Click to read more »result of the discussion was: keep. No consensus that this actually violates UBCR. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC) Template:User dislikes Among Us (edit...
Click to read more »scientology/royajared (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Fails UBCR; attacks a specific religious organization. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply...
Click to read more »User:梦出一切/User Leninism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Fails WP:UBCR, specifically by supporting "violent revolution". Advocating violence in...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violates WP:NONAZIS and WP:UBCR by promoting Stalinism. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply)...
Click to read more »User:Atmleb/Userboxes/terror (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violates WP:UBCR, specifically through advocating for the castration of individuals. Devonian...
Click to read more »this user since most violate WP:UBCR. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 23:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, blatant WP:UBCR violation. — chrs [talk] 20:16,...
Click to read more »this user since most violate WP:UBCR. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 23:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, blatant WP:UBCR violation. — chrs [talk] 20:16,...
Click to read more »User:Lazereon/Userboxes/Blueshirt (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR -- Aunva6talk - contribs 02:46, 17 March 2026 (UTC) Delete: controversial...
Click to read more »Fails WP:UBCR and only use is by a disruptive, community-banned non-contributor. AusLondonder (talk) 22:00, 16 March 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:UBCR. --Schützenpanzer...
Click to read more »User:LightningComplexFire/UBX/NoAnarchy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR violation. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:38, 19 March...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) I think that this may fall under WP:UBCR. Asexuality is a lack of sexual attraction but it's enduring. It's an orientation...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per my literalist reading of WP:UBCR. "Userboxes must not be substantially divisive." It seems pretty divisive...
Click to read more »User:Floralgf/Userboxes/Userbox Name (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR: "Userboxes must not include incivility or personal attacks". This one includes...
Click to read more »Per WP:UBCR and WP:CIV Bestagon ⬡ 12:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:!hate. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR, I suspect...
Click to read more »certain ideologies are "evil" & advocates for their "elimination" violates WP:UBCR & WP:POLEMIC. Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 17:47, 5 June 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »League of Justice (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Fails WP:UBCR. Note that "This noble mission may require the use of arbitrary and extreme...
Click to read more »(UTC) User:Avazina/NO UN (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR says Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or...
Click to read more »divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing”) and WP:UBCR (“Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive”). Toa Nidhiki05 14:20,...
Click to read more »(UTC) User:Avazina/SOB (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR says Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (and redirects per WP:CSD#G8) Blatant WP:UBCR/WP:NONAZIS violations as open support for fascism/fascist ideologies. See...
Click to read more »that are discriminatory towards other editors they may encounter, per WP:UBCR. Some examples of past deletions are an alt-right userbox, a group of alt-right...
Click to read more »(this is its third nomination so far). It is an obvious violation of WP:UBCR, and very inflammatory and divisive. Its message of support for the premiership...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violates WP:UBCR: "Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment...
Click to read more »Fails WP:UBCR and only use is by a disruptive, community-banned non-contributor. AusLondonder (talk) 22:00, 16 March 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:UBCR. --Schützenpanzer...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violates the second bullet of WP:UBCR (Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive). Labeling...
Click to read more »Wikipedia page. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 23:34, 15 March 2026 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:UBCR and only use is by a disruptive, community-banned non-contributor. AusLondonder...
Click to read more »User:UBX/Emperor foe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR says Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/Alt-right pepe, this fails WP:UBCR. The alt-right is a "grouping of white supremacists, neo-Confederates, neo-Nazis...
Click to read more »watch | logs) This userbox is hostile, divisive, and inflammatory. See WP:UBCR. Instead of showing support for a country (presumably Russia judging by the...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR -- Aunva6talk - contribs 18:15, 12 March 2026 (UTC) Delete Violates WP:UBCR: "Userboxes must not be inflammatory...
Click to read more »User:UBX/Identitarian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:NONAZIS/WP:UBCR, Identitarian movement is described as being "a pan-European nationalist...
Click to read more »man34/AfrikanerHomeland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR and WP:POLEMIC - advocates for racial segregation ~delta (talk • cont) 04:18...
Click to read more »divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing”) and WP:UBCR (“Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive”). Advocacy of fascism does...
Click to read more »page content restrictions (page speedied as G5, twice now). Contravenes WP:UBCR. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. Elli (talk...
Click to read more »giuliano 06:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC) This infobox should be deleted per WP:UBCR for being a political soapbox. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 15:18, 18 September...
Click to read more »cite hasn’t edited since 2012, ergo inactive. The rest is just ignoring WP:UBCR, bringing up unrelated facts (if “Assad is the current president of Syria”...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Advocates for insurrectionary anarchism. This fails WP:UBCR as insurrectionary anarchism is an ideology that promotes domestic terrorism...
Click to read more »Libya (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Obviously fails WP:UBCR, more specifically – "Propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind (commercial...
Click to read more »terrorism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Questionable under WP:UBCR. Previous discussion in 2022 appears to have been closed by an involved non-admin...
Click to read more »( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 00:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC) Keep passes WP:UBCR -- Aunva6talk - contribs 01:16, 31 March 2026 (UTC) Keep per Organhaver....
Click to read more »17:23, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Keep. Does not violate any userbox policy (WP:UBCR) or (to my knowledge) fit any deletion reason. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk...
Click to read more »User:Avazina/BIG MISTAKE (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR says Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or...
Click to read more »Assad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Fails WP:UBCR. Expresses support for a leader known for his authoritarian behavior and...
Click to read more »SCIENCE vs EVOLUTION (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR says Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or...
Click to read more »Template:User Pinochet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR, inflammatory political content (praising far-right dictators) — csc-1 00:21...
Click to read more »angry after seeing that or nominating to delete such stupid userboxes. WP:UBCR: "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive." and "Opinion...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. --Bduke (talk) 04:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR. — csc-1 21:49, 6 May 2021 (UTC) Delete per Arccosecant. EpicPupper (talk)...
Click to read more »| logs) Trivializes an important mental health issue, thus violating WP:UBCR. While at face value this may seem a reasonable sentiment, it's a stereotype...
Click to read more »collegial atmosphere. Herostratus (talk) 03:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR. — csc-1 01:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »disowned. Dronebogus (talk) 11:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Delete violates WP:UBCR ("Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive"). Hut 8.5...
Click to read more »Rand Freeman (talk to me) 16:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC) Delete Violates WP:UBCR: "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive." Created...
Click to read more »User:Antigrandiose/userbox/che (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:UBCR, Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment...
Click to read more »divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing”) and WP:UBCR (“Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive”). Advocacy of fascism does...
Click to read more »userboxes inconsistent with the purposes of a collaborative project, per WP:UBCR. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:24, 22 April 2021 (UTC) Delete Agree...
Click to read more »advocate violence against the "ruling class" (and actively promote it) violate UBCR. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 23:37, 12 May 2021...
Click to read more »4chan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unused userbox WP:UBCR: homophobic slur in the text. Although the characteristic misspelling and...
Click to read more »murder of people they are involved in political disputes with goes against WP:UBCR. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 00:36, 13 May 2021...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Unused userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR and WP:POLEMIC, also see WP:NONAZIS. National Anarchism "advocates racial...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Delete per "userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive“ - WP:UBCR ~~ OxonAlex - talk 20:51, 3 August 2019 (UTC) Delete divisive and might actually...
Click to read more »n-nbb (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unused userbox violating WP:UBCR guideline. —andrybak (talk) 17:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom....
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Unused userboxes Political userboxes; per WP:UBCR, quote Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for propaganda, advocacy, or...
Click to read more »Aquabluetesla (talk) 17:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per BLP issues and WP:UBCR Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:40, 21 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom....
Click to read more »speaks a thousand words, and the design of this user box is far more of a WP:UBCR violation than the actual language. A userbox that just says "this user is...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:PROFRINGE and WP:UBCR - this userbox indicates support of a conspiracy theory. ~delta (talk • cont)...
Click to read more »Template:User fic theory (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:UBCR. Also appears to have been created to make a point. — Rhododendrites talk...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) No incoming links/transclusions, violates WP:UBCR, user also indeff'ed for WP:NOTHERE X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed...
Click to read more »Stalinist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Userbox possibly violates WP:UBCR, as it gives support to a specific historical figure responsible for mass...
Click to read more »that's about it. I do not believe this was made in good faith. Violates WP:UBCR. I could understand a keep !vote, however. This userbox is also pretty old...
Click to read more »While it's not blatantly inflammatory it's still divisive and fails WP:UBCR on that account. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 10:11...
Click to read more »Palestinian liberation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) violates WP:UBCR -- Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive. and Wikipedia...
Click to read more »User:Lazereon/Userboxes/Rexist supporter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR -- Aunva6talk - contribs 18:14, 12 March 2026 (UTC) Delete all userboxes...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Unused userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR and WP:POLEMIC, also see WP:NONAZIS. National Anarchism "advocates racial...
Click to read more »Keep Nothing about saying you want a politician to be president violates WP:UBCR. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 20:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC) Keep: Who cares...
Click to read more »User:Lazereon/Userboxes/Anti-natsoc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR -- Aunva6talk - contribs 18:15, 12 March 2026 (UTC) Comment: Isn't this an...
Click to read more »(she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 09:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:UBCR. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC) Delete Does not meet...
Click to read more »Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 15:51, 16 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive", the same...
Click to read more »| watch | logs) Userbox supporting a fascist dictatorship. Violates WP:UBCR: "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive." Created...
Click to read more »WP:HID -- Aunva6talk - contribs 14:45, 12 March 2026 (UTC) Delete Violates WP:UBCR: "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive." Created...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violates WP:UBCR: "Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment...
Click to read more »was deleted after an RfD. Userboxes that mock medical conditions fail WP:UBCR and should be deleted. We have a lot of editors with OCD, and it can affect...
Click to read more »the userboxes but this one does push the limits and is a violation of WP:UBCR. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 15:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive", the same...
Click to read more »Francis Idol (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unused userbox WP:UBCR Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment...
Click to read more »censorship" in every deletion discussion. Please consider that we reference WP:UBCR and WP:UP#NOT when deciding if it is appropriate to delete a userbox; it's...
Click to read more »Fascist Republican (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violates WP:UBCR either by promoting fascism or by equating Republicans to fascists (maybe...
Click to read more »before these present discussions/etc. I do not believe this violates WP:UBCR. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:00, 24 June 2026...
Click to read more »is inflammatory content regarding a specific country or nationality. WP:UBCR does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: delete. Per WP:UBCR, userboxes may not be "inflammatory or substantially divisive", and the consensus...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC) Keep I don't think this is enough of a WP:UBCR violation to justify deletion. Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:01, 8 April 2022...
Click to read more »23:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC) Delete per my strict interpretation of WP:UBCR. In principle I don’t like the idea of suppressing speech under the reasons...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Unused userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR, WP:POLEMIC, and WP:NONAZIS. See other previous discussions about such userboxes...
Click to read more »Qaddafi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Obvious violation of WP:UBCR, created by a blocked sockpuppeteer. Clearly inflammatory and divisive, as...
Click to read more »was "Yes, Death!" They weren't the best of people to say the least... WP:UBCR requires Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive. This one clearly...
Click to read more »| watch | logs) Userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR, WP:POLEMIC, and WP:NONAZIS. See other previous discussions about such userboxes...
Click to read more »template seems to be uncivil, inflammatory, or substantially divisive, see WP:UBCR. This is certainly not a humorous template. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 21:51,...
Click to read more »Adding Machine/Imagfriend (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR. Not remotely a civil userbox. Dismissing God as an "imaginary friend" is...
Click to read more »(UTC) User:Avazina/PETA 2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR says Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda, advocacy, or...
Click to read more »benefit to keeping both. Userboxes are usually left alone unless they fail WP:UBCR, and this is nowhere near failing that guideline. Chess enjoyer (talk) 21:55...
Click to read more »I who had the wrong meaning, therefore this could be in violation of WP:UBCR. Adam9007 (talk) 23:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Keep - I have long held that...
Click to read more »things. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC) Delete as inflammatory...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom Andre🚐 02:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:UBCR this userbox is purely inflammatory and serves no beneficial purpose other...
Click to read more »genocides. Vanilla Wizard 💙 23:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC) Delete all per WP:UBCR Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive and Wikipedia...
Click to read more »/Userboxes/Incest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) See WP:UBCR. I would say that this is "inflammatory or substantially divisive". Incest...
Click to read more »to contain content which is "inflammatory or substantially divisive" (WP:UBCR). This userbox is advocating that the UK attempt to annex a large number...
Click to read more »template promoting a terrorist organization, which obviously violates WP:UBCR; only use is creator who is blocked anyway. Dronebogus (talk) 06:25, 2 May...
Click to read more »miss it if it's deleted. Having said that, I don't see how this violates WP:UBCR. I understand that, per NOTWEBHOST, The focus of user pages should not be...
Click to read more »such userboxes. GoodDay (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR, considering the main purpose of the Groyper movement is to be inflammatory...
Click to read more »more about the criteria? Vanilla Wizard 💙 00:46, 27 March 2022 (UTC) WP:UBCR and WP:UPNOT. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion and you will see entries...
Click to read more »substantially divisive and appears to advocate the Lost Cause narrative. Per WP:UBCR, this advocacy is unwarranted, especially given how inflammatory (intentionally...
Click to read more »User:UBX/Huge mistake (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC...
Click to read more »userboxes, redundancy doesn't exactly matter, and I don't see anything in WP:UBCR that applies. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:57...
Click to read more »April 2022 (UTC) Delete - Yeah, okay. This is pretty much as explicitly WP:UBCR as it gets.--WaltCip-(talk) 13:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Delete - We don't...
Click to read more »humanity", so not any reason to delete based on that. To me, nothing violates WP:UBCR either. This isn't trying to recruit anyone, and all the userboxes in Category:Political...
Click to read more »User:Katangais/Userboxes/Ian Smith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR violation, inflammatory — csc-1 23:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC) Hello, I'm genuinely...
Click to read more »Hussein (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Clearcut violation of WP:UBCR. Obviously divisive and not conducive to building an encyclopedia. —pythoncoder...
Click to read more »Диктатор/Userboxes/Antiliberal user (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR violations that have no place on a collaborative project. — csc-1 20:49,...
Click to read more »scope of PROD. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 04:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:UBCR --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 23:29, 18 March 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:NONAZIS. It's...
Click to read more »experienced the (still-ongoing) plague. It's well within the limits of WP:UBCR, and while it may not be being actively used, that's not a compelling policy-based...
Click to read more »myself/fascist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Gross violation of WP:UBCR. Choucas 🐦⬛ 20:41, 9 June 2026 (UTC) Comment @I can't find some userboxes...
Click to read more »encyclopedia. This is exactly the sort of thing WP:NOTGAME advises against. Per WP:UBCR, userboxes must not be inflammatory. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2024...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) This is an explicit call to violence. WP:UBCR does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC...
Click to read more »watch | logs) This userbox is hostile, divisive, and inflammatory. See WP:UBCR. Instead of showing support for a country (presumably Russia judging by the...
Click to read more »User:Yndtbt/LGBT not Q (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Mildly fails WP:UBCR point 2; userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive. The...
Click to read more »userboxes may not be "inflammatory or substantially divisive" per WP:UBCR. However, in this case the discussion did not converge on whether this particular...
Click to read more »is highly inflammatory, to say the least. This should be deleted per WP:UBCR banning substantially divisive userboxes. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply...
Click to read more »wars and battles. The box does not violate any userbox prohibitions at WP:UBCR, but this deletion nomination runs afoul of WP:NOTCENSORED. - Ahunt (talk)...
Click to read more »Antifa, but an endorsement of political violence. Per WP:POLEMIC and WP:UBCR, this is not really conductive for building an encyclopedia and I don’t find...
Click to read more »userboxes/SanerWorldNoReligion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:UBCR... "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive"; and this...
Click to read more »(UTC) User:BZPN/LGBT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) see WP:UBCR and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/onemanonewoman 4th nomination...
Click to read more »December 2021 (UTC) Keep. I do not believe that this userbox violates WP:UBCR, so I cannot support deleting it, regardless of how some people might feel...
Click to read more »qualifies as "substantially divisive" and therefore must be deleted per WP:UBCR. —ScottyWong— 20:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC) User:Gnosandes/userboxes/Stalinist (edit...
Click to read more »obviously disruptive. ―Susmuffin Talk 04:25, 28 May 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR. — csc-1 02:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. Extraordinary Writ (talk)...
Click to read more »User:UBX/Anti-Neurodiversity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) violates WP:UBCR "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive" and WP:POLEMIC...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Obviously inflammatory and divisive, this userbox violates WP:UBCR by essentially endorsing neo-Confederate opposition to the removal of Confederate...
Click to read more »blocked and TPA blocked former editor's personal Userboxes page. These violate UBCR, as they target and attack users with these dietary restrictions in a vulgar...
Click to read more »Arenghtqru888 (talk) 10:32, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Userbox & related policies like WP:UBCR and WP:UPNOT kind of go hand-in-hand with "(user) supports [terrorist/inhumane...
Click to read more »userbox inconsistent with the purposes of a collaborative project, per WP:UBCR. So-and-so "is harmful" went here. Unless it is the purpose to encourage...
Click to read more »ds/Userboxes/doug (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) per WP:UBCR etc, this box serves no encyclopedic purpose JayCubby 21:05, 14 May 2026...
Click to read more »(draft)s. Gaelan 💬✏️ 16:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC) Thanks, Gaelan. Delete as WP:UBCR "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive." or "Wikipedia is not an...
Click to read more »Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:UP and WP:UBCR. Promoting political causes in userspace is counterproductive to the goals...
Click to read more »userpage was just made today (and is the user's only edit), it may violate WP:UBCR as being substantially divisive. Royz-vi Tsibele (talk) 03:43, 5 July 2026...
Click to read more »22:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC) Keep I like the optimism. Well within Wikipedia:UBCR as the event is highly likely to ocour. Not excessive, not bringing the encyclopaedia...
Click to read more »theory, breaching the "inflammatory or substantially divisive" part of WP:UBCR. If it was moved to another title and the icon was replaced I'd support keeping...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs)Userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR, WP:POLEMIC, and WP:NONAZIS. See other previous discussions about such userboxes...
Click to read more »User:MQDuck/userboxes/Right To Resist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC...
Click to read more »same-sex marriage - violate the guideline on userbox content restrictions (WP:UBCR) because they are "inflammatory or divisive" and "propaganda [or] advocacy"...
Click to read more »11 March 2019 (UTC) Delete with fire - per WP:NOPLATFORMing nazis and WP:UBCR "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive". People who choose to display...
Click to read more »repressive bodies have of anti-capitalist networks." It appears to violate WP:UBCR to have a userbox that promotes an entity that seeks to firebomb police cruisers...
Click to read more »WP:USERPAGE. --bonadea contributions talk 08:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Keep — No WP:UBCR or WP:UPNOT violations. — csc-1 13:29, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Keep - Is there...
Click to read more »frivolous MfD Clearly not uncivil, inflammatory, or substantially divisive (WP:UBCR). No reasonable Wikipedia editor is going to be sent into a fit of rage by...
Click to read more »Ratnahastin (talk) 11:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC) The relevant policy is WP:UBCR. This says "Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: propaganda, advocacy...
Click to read more »User:UBX/Alt-right pepe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Fails WP:UBCR. The alt-right is a "grouping of white supremacists, neo-Confederates, neo-Nazis...
Click to read more »Keep The word "violent" was removed, which I believe is good enough for WP:UBCR. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 20:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC) Keep. I am not...
Click to read more »obviously not an attack page. Also not polemic enough per NOTADVOCACY or UBCR to cause major disruption. Politrukki (talk) 21:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »User:Yilangren/Userboxes/radfem (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC...
Click to read more »User:Libertyville/USCongress (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC...
Click to read more »Template:User hate CCP (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR and WP:POLEMIC. Divisive userbox. Broc (talk) 08:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more ») 16:38, 30 March 2026 (UTC) Delete. This particular userbox isn't a WP:UBCR violation, but per SmokeyJoe this examination of them all to find a boundary...
Click to read more »User:Wumbolo/Userbox Trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:UBCR prohibits substantially divisive user-boxes. Used in only one user-page,...
Click to read more »parent projects to absorb) and the userbox (I'm not comfortable with deleting UBCR-compliant WikiProject UBXs). But other than that, this project needs to go...
Click to read more »will not comment on this, but it sounds plausible enough to consider per WP:UBCR. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Comment. This template...
Click to read more »as automatically violating the civility or personal attack sections of WP:UBCR. You could easily argue the same thing about fetal rights. However, I would...
Click to read more »good, actually. If you want a guideline which supports deletion, try WP:UBCR, but I don't need a PAG to explain why this is a terrible thing to host anywhere...
Click to read more »all such userboxes could be WP:5P1 (WP:NOTSOAPBOX) + WP:5P2 (WP:NPOV) + WP:UBCR (quote, emphasis mine: Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for propaganda...
Click to read more »John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 21:35, 3 August 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:UBCR divisive. Can't imagine any scenario where this userbox aids collaboration...
Click to read more »dictators. It is in my opinion obvious that these boxes egregiously violate WP:UBCR, because there is no way any of these could not be considered "inflammatory...
Click to read more »would be fine if it didn't equate the EU to communism). Both violate WP:UBCR. The other two are statements of political opinions which are fairly common...
Click to read more »April 2022 (UTC) Support deletion per above, based on my reading of WP:UBCR's restrictions on propaganda and advocacy it is completely unacceptable for...
Click to read more »consistent with the relevant guidelines for deleting userboxes, specifically WP:UBCR and WP:UP#NOT. See Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: Propaganda...
Click to read more »templates already? I bet a majority of them fall into WP:UP#POLEMIC and WP:UBCR in some way shape or form. These deletions threaten Wikipedia's stance on...
Click to read more »Fails WP:UBCR with its unambiguous reference to straight pride. Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC) Delete I think this breaks WP:UBCR; it's clearly...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Delete WP:NORACISTS. This userbox is a definite violation of WP:UBCR. Some people might feel intimidated by this. Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:35...
Click to read more »as the Geometry Dash logo) are not allowed to be used in userboxes per WP:UBCR. KomradeKalashnikov (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Oh, okay. Thank you...
Click to read more »images), and some other topics of hot debatable topics to contradict WP:UBCR, but that's an opinion of content, not a violation of policies. If something...
Click to read more »| links | watch | logs) Glorifies violent ideologue and falls afoul of UBCR. Note that "Alexander Berkman" was an anarchist who attempted to assassinate...
Click to read more »deletion on the grounds that they violate the guideline restrictions in WP:UBCR. Boxes advocating support for same sex marriage were pointedly not included...
Click to read more »ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC) ProcrastinatingReader, WP:UBCR, which I was just coming back to add to my rationale, says Userboxes must...
Click to read more »were deleted because the community reached a consensus that they violate WP:UBCR, which states: Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive...
Click to read more »means depends on who you ask. Levivich (talk) 04:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC) WP:UBCR: "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive". Are you...
Click to read more »userboxes related to politics be explicitly forbidden and deleted? See WP:UBCR and Wikipedia:Userboxes/Politics. --Pudeo (talk) 16:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »This userbox is substantially divisive and aggressively political. Per WP:UBCR, this hyper-accusatory political stance is unwarranted and inflammatory....
Click to read more »that. As for the userboxes, some of them are needlessly divisive per WP:UBCR and should probably be removed. However, you should raise your concern with...
Click to read more »stray from that purpose. In sum, there's no specific guidance beyond WP:UBCR and WP:UPNOT at the moment, so if you think something violates those policies...
Click to read more »like don’t read” doesn’t fly on WP; we have this thing called Wikipedia:UBCR Dronebogus (talk) 07:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Also, I have had userboxes...
Click to read more »created the userbox in the first place. I know that many editors ignore WP:UBCR, but that userbox was not just simply controversial. It was inflammatory...
Click to read more »Since the iNat logo is copyrighted, it can't be used in a userbox per WP:UBCR. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC) Hey. I have an idea...
Click to read more »viewpoints and the synthesis of diverse information. Is it even allowed? WP:UBCR clearly states "Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for... Propaganda,...
Click to read more »Personally, my view is that these userboxes stand in clear violation of WP:UBCR, while the categories violate WP:User categories#Inappropriate types of user...
Click to read more »similar userbox for antifa[7] that was eventually removed on the ground of WP:UBCR, WP:POLEMIC and other policies, also this user(Queerly Bohemian) was using...
Click to read more »frankly offensive nomination statement. Userbox miserably fails both WP:UBCR and WP:UBDIVISIVE, our two most relevant guidelines here. No matter your...
Click to read more »would likely be brought up in an RfA. Indeed, I think they might fail WP:UBCR and could (should?) be deleted. SilkTork (talk) 09:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »on this one, but I imagine the conversation would be based mostly on WP:UBCR and whether this is "substantially divisive" (perhaps broadening out into...
Click to read more »Whether or not BLP applies to userboxes, those are both innappropriate per WP:UBCR: Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive. and Wikipedia...
Click to read more »consider the possibility that such a userbox contravenes WP:UP#PROMO and WP:UBCR, because it could be construed as "advocacy" or "promotion of [a] viewpoint...
Click to read more »was rigged and erroneous," a fringe theory. It made me wonder whether WP:UBCR should include "fringe theories" in the parenthetic list "Wikipedia is not...
Click to read more »years ago without further discussion (there is a strong argument from WP:UBCR). Katzrockso (talk) 01:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC) That was the discussion...
Click to read more »substantially divisive" is not allowed in userboxes, per the guideline at WP:UBCR. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 22:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC) That describes userboxes...
Click to read more »for what can be included in userboxes, including some restrictions: see WP:UBCR. I assume that all other-language Wikipedias have their own rules and to...
Click to read more »the Teahouse! No, you may not use non-free images in a userbox - see WP:UBCR for details. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »fruit, and I've removed it as divisive and attacking other editors per WP:UBCR; there is a very long history at MFD of nuking these. I would vigorously...
Click to read more »resentful masses. - on their user page, among others, that flagrantly violate WP:UBCR #2 as well as WP:HID, and may warrant attention from the community. I'm surprised...
Click to read more »