Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
presented in list format or embedded in regular prose, these risk becoming trivia magnets, which grow increasingly unwieldy as items are added. If such a...
Click to read more »Articles with trivia sections (refresh) All articles 561 This project deals with trivia sections on articles, and cleaning them up. Many articles on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Trivia is broadly defined as information that is not important. However, since Wikipedia consists of articles, we can be more specific—trivia is information...
Click to read more »Note: It's possible Wikipedia:Trivia covers the ideas which were proposed here. A trivia section can serve a good purpose on a page as a temporary solution...
Click to read more »(UTC) The Beatles trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) The Beatles trivia was nominated for deletion...
Click to read more »base - this is trivia --Doc (?) 00:04, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) Weak keep. At first I was thinking about merging it to EastEnders under a trivia section, like...
Click to read more »contain lists of isolated facts, often grouped into a section labeled "Trivia", "Facts", "Miscellanea", "Other information", "Notes" (not to be confused...
Click to read more »Presidential trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) This article is a collection of trivia. All of the...
Click to read more »page. W.marsh 22:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC) Unencylopedic article about trivia from the reality show, The Amazing Race. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate...
Click to read more »isolated facts, which are often grouped into their own section, labeled "Trivia", "Notes" (not to be confused with "Notes" sections which store footnotes)...
Click to read more »this for the show itself (as implied by the links), or for a page with trivia on the show (as implied by the title of this AfD page)? If it's for the...
Click to read more »"delete" because there's too much trivia on WP already. But there's no getting rid of it, and maybe we could move it into "trivia ghetto" articles... ----Isaac...
Click to read more »deletion/London Underground trivia Articles for deletion/London Underground trivia/2nd Articles for deletion/London Underground trivia (2nd nomination) Articles...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »Fairly important trivia, but too much for main Beatles article. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 00:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 'Important trivia' is a contradiction...
Click to read more »section as "trivia" is incivil, but again, this is not the fault of the template itself. For the purposes of this template, the WP:NOT#TRIVIA policy and...
Click to read more »probably not. It can be argued that the routine inclusion of Family Guy trivia in articles makes Wikipedia more annoying. Readers often come to Wikipedia...
Click to read more »delete. —Xezbeth 07:38, May 6, 2005 (UTC) While there are some interesting trivia facts here, I think they should be merged into the articles on the individual...
Click to read more »Hockey Trivia for Kids is a compilation of three previously published books: Hockey Trivia for Kids, Hockey Trivia for Kids 2, and Hockey Trivia for Kids...
Click to read more »Michigan Wikipedians Trivia Night questions. Our second annual Trivia Night happened on March 14, 2012. Hope you enjoyed the trivia! The underlined portion...
Click to read more »WikiProject Popular Culture aims to preserve "In popular culture" and "Trivia"-type information in Wikipedia in a manner that does not compromise Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC) It's a list of trivia. Delete or Merge with Keane. Geoffrey Spear 00:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »December 2006 (UTC) Metalocalypse trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) List of trivia copied from old version of...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »As a general question, are trivia items of interest? As a specific question, while some would dislike it, is the trivia item in the history of edits...
Click to read more »July 2007 (UTC) Baseball trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) "Trivia" in the name gives it away...
Click to read more »January 2007 (UTC) Ghostbusters Trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) This is a trivia article, without references...
Click to read more »deletion/London Underground trivia Articles for deletion/London Underground trivia/2nd Articles for deletion/London Underground trivia (2nd nomination) Articles...
Click to read more »09:34Z Albuquerque Trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) nn facts, trivia should not have their...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »discussion. The first is that the page ought to be deleted per WP:NOT and WP:TRIVIA. The second is that the page ought to be kept in order to divert unwanted...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »things off is a bad idea--Jiang 05:34, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC) Anyone wanting trivia on Elvis Presley is just going to look at the Elvis Presley page. Delete...
Click to read more »States Presidential trivia (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links) The page is solely a collection of trivia. See WP:TRIVIA. ¿Exir?¡Kamalabadi...
Click to read more »WP:LIST etc... Trivia Information. see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Madonna_trivia060916 and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Keane_trivia--Td6c 16:55...
Click to read more »(UTC) Lists of trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Pointless list of lists of trivia. Fundamentally...
Click to read more »May 2007 (UTC) Delaware trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Trivia articles are to be avoided...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »Delete - Trivia within actual articles is bad enough, let alone articles devoted to trivia. We may as well have a page about Welcome Back Kotter trivia or Tandem...
Click to read more »a trivia article.Realkyhick 09:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Comment How about United States Presidential trivia? If this Philippine Presidential trivia article...
Click to read more »article: Articles for deletion/Kolkata trivia Articles for deletion/Kolkata trivia (2nd nomination) Kolkata trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »(UTC) Lehigh University trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) trivia from a college forked into...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is based on consensus. This trivia is well known in Sting fan circles, and among the more interesting fun trivia relating to the artist. There was...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Iron Maiden trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:TRIVIA by its very concept...
Click to read more »is a petition that will have no direct affect on trivia sections. If they want to change how trivia sections are dealt with, it should be at a relevant...
Click to read more »October 2006 (UTC) Delete If trivia sections are to be avoided in articles, there clearly shouldn't be entire articles for trivia. Dancter 03:22, 21 October...
Click to read more »the posted categories for deletion. There are other articles regarding trivia and quotes in Wikipedia. Merge a small selection and Redirect. This is not...
Click to read more »information about the LU. Besides there are lots of other trivia pages. Most people will argue that trivia information is at least interesting. Simply south 17:33...
Click to read more »This is an archive of older discussions about how much trivia the Wikipedia should contain: September 2003...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Charmed trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Wikipedia isn't a trivia guide. This guideline...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. DS 17:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC) page full of trivia, doesn't need its own page or such Booshakla 02:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »main page. See: Talk:Barry Manilow#Trivia page - Nabla 22:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Barry Manilow/Barry Manilow Trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »Wikiproject Trivia and Popular Culture mostly deals with the deletions of articles that are entirely trivia and popular culture while Wikiproject Trivia Cleanup...
Click to read more »nom Drdisque 00:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. Trivia sections are discouraged, so I suppose trivia articles should be deleted. Stifle (talk) 20:00,...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »change, see this post to WP:TRIVIA; salient quote: "Here is a wikiproject proposal for trivia and a fresh look at trivia policy by the admins. Support...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »contains a trivia section" boxes all over the place. Many authors have used trivia sections on a number of articles and each piece of trivia in the section...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles. Not because it has trivia in the article name: it's due to this just being random trivia and statistics about...
Click to read more »(UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Zealot Trivia Articles for deletion/Zealot Trivia (2nd nomination) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »Space Odyssey trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) WP:TRIVIA, specifically. If we don't allow trivia sections,...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »deletion/B-52 Stratofortress trivia Articles for deletion/B-52 Stratofortress trivia (2nd nomination) B-52 Stratofortress trivia (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »It's worth finally, summarizing what WP:TRIVIA ("Avoid trivia sections") is about. It does not say trivia sections should not exist; rather it advises...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »influences and trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log) Wikipedia isn't a guide to trivia. Editors think...
Click to read more »the fountain of trivia should continue unabated. The new and absurd signs indicating "This is trivia, Wikipedia discourages trivia" should make any seasoned...
Click to read more »for deletion/List of 2001: A Space Odyssey trivia Articles for deletion/List of 2001: A Space Odyssey trivia (2nd nomination) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »WP:TRIVIA discourages the use of trivia sections in articles, this article in its title embraces the fact that the entire article is trivia. WP:TRIVIA does...
Click to read more »Articles for deletion/Pink Floyd trivia/2nd Articles for deletion/Pink Floyd trivia (2nd nomination) Pink Floyd trivia (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »March 2006 (UTC) Delete Trivia is not part of an encyclopedia MadCow257 05:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC) Merge Precedent for trivia has already been established...
Click to read more »of trivia associated with Continental Airlines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) junk trivia page...
Click to read more »result was DELETE. TigerShark (talk) 22:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Mohanlal Trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 20:52, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Just a collection of trivia about the show. I don't think it can possibly be reformated to resemble...
Click to read more »Show was a hit show, but it certainly doesn't need a trivia page. Find a site with all the trivia, and put a link to it on the main That 70's Show page...
Click to read more »Race statistics and trivia, to kind of mirror or parallel, if you will, List of Survivor statistics and trivia. The current trivia page has indeed been...
Click to read more »October 2006 (UTC) A whole article about trivia isn't needed at all. Per WP:TRIVIA, and Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles, this page doesn't...
Click to read more »they can easily find it in the article history... But as we all know, trivia sections... *puts on shades* ...should be made history. YEEEEEEAAAAAAH!...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »September 2007 (UTC) Wikipedia:Trivia sections should be deleted because it explains a pointless polocy. I mean why is trivia so wrong. They can make Wikipedia...
Click to read more »(UTC) The article is a direct contradiction of WP:AVTRIV. I've merged the trivia in the main SG-1 article and thrown some none notable bits out. The article...
Click to read more »Wikipedians for a trivia night at Boxyard RTP food court in Research Triangle Park on Tuesday, October 1, 2024, from 5:30–7:45 pm (come any time; trivia starts at...
Click to read more »quite as strong as The Beatles trivia article also up for deletion but still has some good non-trivial information. "Trivia" just isn't the right word; how...
Click to read more »trivia there is into Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith, then delete.--み使い Mitsukai 16:31, 10 March 2006 (UTC) Comment A lot of these trivia points...
Click to read more »result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC) List of trivia contests (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »BCS Sports Trivia News (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) It is a copy of BCS Sports Trivia. Dreamy 02:12...
Click to read more »marsh 18:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC) List of Pop 100 chart achievements and trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »trivia simply don't belong on Wikipedia. RobJ1981 06:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Keep or Merge with Main Article. Plenty of other pages include trivia,...
Click to read more »kingboyk 23:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC) Trivia articles--Td6c 17:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC) Speedy Keep - All the Trivia articles went through this already...
Click to read more »This seems to have been created by a single purpose account to protest the Trivia Cleanup Project, this project violates WP:POINT and is at cross purposes...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. WjBscribe 09:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC) BCS Sports Trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance...
Click to read more »to the show. Merge relevant bits to the House article. Delete the rest. Trivia is merely a collection of random facts or factoids often of doubtful reliability...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) nn list of trivia, which is discourage on WP. Other lists of trivia have been deleted in the past (Steely Dan), and...
Click to read more »Physchim62 (talk) 13:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC) Wikipedia is not a collection of trivia. Merge all useful contents to Janet Jackson, if any; otherwise, delete....
Click to read more »delete. Sr13 05:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC) List of Survivor statistics and trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »result was delete. --Coredesat 02:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC) List of Events and Trivia on Get This (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »Discussion summarization; Twitter bots tracking government edits; extracting trivia from Wikipedia: A list of recent research publications on various topics...
Click to read more »Procedural. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 08:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Trivia (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! TRIVIA: Voices of Feminism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »27 September 2024 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Fun Trivia [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!...
Click to read more »High EV and good quality Articles in which this image appears Melitaea trivia, List of butterflies of Israel FP category for this image Wikipedia:Featured...
Click to read more »--Coredesat 02:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC) Kapamilya, Deal or No Deal statistics and trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »16 September 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete — Word for word duplicate of Cher#Trivia. --Aaron 02:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Delete - per nom. Clay4president...
Click to read more »--Coredesat 07:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Alright, first off the article has "trivia" in it's name, it's an obvious candidate for violating WP:AVTRIV. The rest...
Click to read more »Merge per TBC. --Richhoncho 17:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Merge, not as a trivia section though. L0b0t 22:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Delete, It has been subsumed...
Click to read more »result was delete. Courcelles 08:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC) Codigo Cube Trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Delete. Waltontalk 19:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Fun Trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC) User:Reywas92/Trivia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Extensive use of user space...
Click to read more »sparse participation. Deor (talk) 10:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC) TimeShift Trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »week, taking four slots. People appeared desperate to bone up on their trivia; checking not only this year's World Cup, but the last one. Even so, they...
Click to read more »(glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Cabela's Outdoor Trivia Challenge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »however, these sections can devolve into indiscriminate collections of trivia or cruft. They should be carefully maintained, as they may attract trivial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles#Check your fiction Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) Wikipedia:Image...
Click to read more »or deleted content." JohnCD (talk) 19:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC) User:The Trivia Man/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violates WP:FAKEARTICLE...
Click to read more »whatever problem there may be. Trivia - Per WP:TRIVIA, trivia is not recommended. Please try to incorporate relevant trivia into the rest of the article...
Click to read more »PictureTrivia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »team) Templatonia national football association does not really exist. (Trivia of the national association) Football in Templatonia (Internal links) (Place...
Click to read more »rather let the opportunity to find trivia (as asked by readership), but with a better way to identify what is not trivia (as defined by the editors). Somehow...
Click to read more »created the suggested Seinfeld trivia caseSeinfeld trivia case. --BDD (talk) 16:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC) Seinfeld trivia → List of Seinfeld minor characters...
Click to read more »especially true when disparate facts are grouped together, such as in a "Trivia" list. An introductory paragraph may help convey its significance. In many...
Click to read more »applies to any issue of personal preference; some editors hate trivia, but what constitutes trivia is a subjective opinion and as things stand there is no concrete...
Click to read more »—ScottyWong— 20:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC) User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Trivia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:NOTWEBHOST - this appears...
Click to read more »first being that not everyone agrees on what constitutes trivia. When someone "deletes trivia", without giving any more specific explanation, it is possible...
Click to read more »deletion/Stanford University in popular culture. A mostly unreferenced collection of trivia - list of works that mention Tulane University. Such a list fails WP:LISTN...
Click to read more »applies to any issue of personal preference; some editors hate trivia, but what constitutes trivia is a subjective opinion and as things stand there's no concrete...
Click to read more »Darktalon Blood saga has a Dragon character named Euphemistus." Trivia Laundromat: Trivia sections are to laundry lists what agar-filled petri dishes are...
Click to read more »to find that they have the most ridiculous trivia. I went through each individual episode, and cut out trivia which could be considered irrelevant or unencyclopedic...
Click to read more »log) appears to be a cover for trivia. incorporate relevant details into the D. B. Cooper article. See Wikipedia:Trivia sections. Aurush kazemini (talk)...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) a trivia fork based on a few mentions of a board game, not notable enough for it's...
Click to read more »Elvis Presley with the comment that the trivia section in that article had gotten out of hand. I agree, and the trivia works no better as an independent article...
Click to read more »subpages) Template:Trivia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Propose merging Template:Reduce trivia with Template:Trivia. These templates...
Click to read more »topics deemed subjectively by Wikipedians to be trivia are inherently non-notable; WP:TRIVIA refers to "Trivia" sections in articles and does not apply here...
Click to read more »(UTC) Oppose The Cast and Awards sections as lists are not so great, the trivia section really needs to go, and the references are generally thin. The article...
Click to read more »LIST. Trivia information is not encyclopedias. see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keane trivia, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cher trivia.--Gaaa 22:11...
Click to read more »that are selected through an informal review process. It is not a general trivia section. The choice of articles is subject to a set of criteria that are...
Click to read more »date-related trivia articles have value or should or should not be available on Wikipedia. The issue is simply whether or not these trivia articles are...
Click to read more »words per hour, more or less. Trivia sections should be kept to a minimum, since the preceding guidelines are paramount. Trivia, if included, should follow...
Click to read more »regard to the effect on the article as a whole. The adding of unsourced trivia to featured articles is a bane that requires constant housekeeping attention...
Click to read more »whatever problem there may be. Trivia - Per WP:TRIVIA, trivia is not recommended. Please try to incorporate relevant trivia into the rest of the article...
Click to read more »Using diacritics (or national alphabet) in the name of the article (2006) Trivia is what Wikipedia does best (2007) Image:User.gif: unintended bias? (2008)...
Click to read more »questions for the panel through the chat! We will also have some NYC wiki trivia you can participate in, with confectionery prizes. Wikimedia NYC on Youtube...
Click to read more »interesting, I'm not sure the prose is brilliant. It degenerates into a list and trivia by the end of the article, including a ridiculous section on the dead Norton...
Click to read more »information into Adagio for Strings or any other article. It's a laundry list/trivia dump in its own article and no more worthwhile cluttering any other article...
Click to read more »general trivia section" ... but this eight-year-old set has nothing to do with new or expanded articles, so its only effect is as a WP:TRIVIA section...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) The article is mostly contain trivia and WP is not a place to throw up trivia collections like this. Also there is no sources provided...
Click to read more »outlines or plot summaries, which are subject to editorial control). The trivia and goofs sections that are based on user submissions. The recommendations...
Click to read more »Tulane University in popular culture. A mostly unreferenced collection of trivia - list of works that mention Johns Hopkins University. Such a list fails...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) fancruft and trivia Aurush kazeminitalk 05:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Delete Unencyclopedic and...
Click to read more »above. Trivia may be appropriate under some circumstances. A list of random trivia isn't. -- Seed 2.0 00:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Delete Trivia. --Mardavich...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Trivia collection, consisting of a bunch of bare-name uses. Adds no understanding...
Click to read more »WP:OC#TRIVIA This is a list of things related to a specific event, however this knowledge is merely trivia and serves no real purpose (other than trivia value)...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Pure trivia, and a violation of WP:FIVE - This has become to place to document the use...
Click to read more »is for an older version. I would recommend merging and/or deleting the trivia section. - Tutmosis 21:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC) LILVOKA doesn't seem to...
Click to read more »discussion. Coverage and factuality: 7 Good coverage. Lots of information and trivia. Writing style: 7 Writing style seems to be correct. Structure: 7 The structure...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Avoid template creep Wikipedia:Citation overkill Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trivia sections) MOS:UNLINKDATES Wikipedia:Not everything needs a navbox...
Click to read more »Another WP:TRIVIA list...somehow mixed together with an in popular culture article Bulldog123 05:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC) Delete list of WP:TRIVIA and could...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) This article is pure trivia and is just a place to shove pieces of trivia that don't have a place in the main article(s). The...
Click to read more »that are of fleeting interest. There is no discrimination between lists of trivia that an unspecified group of people may find compelling, and genuine knowledge...
Click to read more »– (View log) This article also contains a trivia list which is unreferenced once again. Delete per WP:TRIVIA and WP:V JForget 23:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) List of MusicMaximum Hot 100 Chart Achievements and Trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete - another laundry list trivia dump of a loosely associated items which have nothing in common beyond the...
Click to read more »of trivia. --Haemo 04:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC) Delete as indiscriminate trivia. VanTucky (talk) 04:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC) Delete indiscriminate trivia. Oysterguitarist...
Click to read more »01:40, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Template:Trivia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) I've only seen one "Trivia" header in the past couple years...
Click to read more »was, and I quote, "since idiots seem inclined to continuously readd pop trivia to ENCYCLOPEDIA ARTICLES... this will be protected until said time the parties...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) New article; it's literally just a list of trivia forked from a trivia section in Street Fighter. No indication is made as to why this...
Click to read more »trivia dump on its own and would be no better cluttering up any other articles. Otto4711 17:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:FIVE - Not a trivia collection...
Click to read more »Programming Language(s): C Function Summary: This bot adds the {{trivia}} tag under Trivia sections to articles which don't already have the tag. Edit period(s)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Copyrights Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) Wikipedia:Manual of Style Wikipedia:Trivia sections Violation of certain rules, such as copyright, is grounds for immediate...
Click to read more »taking place? Demolition Man (film) ... Repeated removal of item in section trivia. Namely entry describing screen shot of person 'Scott Peterson'. Who's involved...
Click to read more »Records Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2017 February 2 Movie Trivia Talking to the camera Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2017...
Click to read more »which is not specifically about the show. Lacks notability, is primarily trivia type content, and does not meet WP:FICTION requirements. Relevant and important...
Click to read more »templates {{trivia}} and {{trivia small}} to identify and categorize articles with trivia sections; there's even a handy bot that sorts the trivia tags into...
Click to read more »run-of-the-mill failure of WP:IPC, WP:GNG, WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:TRIVIA. Only three references, so most of this is WP:OR. Lead states it wants to...
Click to read more »the middle ages to today; that is to say, an indiscriminate collection of trivia loosely related to imps. --Haemo 00:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Comment IMPossible...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Useless trivia/gossip. Not encyclopedic in the least. — JFG talk 09:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »trivia. Biggspowd 21:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom; mostly unreferenced or poorly referenced trivia. If kept, rename to "John Lennon trivia."...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Wikipedia discourages trivia section, this whole article is a trivia section. None of it seems to be of any encyclopedic...
Click to read more »WP:FIVE ("Wikipedia is not a trivia collection") and WP:NOT#IINFO. Eyrian 16:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:FIVE as trivia. Useight 18:33, 2 August...
Click to read more »Coverage and factuality: 4 Basically just a plot summary with occasional trivia. Some discussion of awards toward the end. No real insight into the movie's...
Click to read more »deletion/Tulane University in popular culture. A mostly unreferenced collection of trivia aka list of works that mention Yale University. Such a list fails WP:LISTN...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) It does not include a prohibition on trivia collections It says that Wikipedia is not a trivia collection. And so it should not be--it can, however...
Click to read more »writing or unnecessary trivia. Speaking of trivia, the section on "Television, music, and film appearances" looks like a WP:TRIVIA list. Probably this should...
Click to read more »name "== Trivia ==" and place the tag directly underneath the trivia header. Skips the page if any {{Trivia}} variant is found. I see that {{Trivia}} is only...
Click to read more »it's just a list of loosely associated facts (ie, trivia). The best way to gauge if it's a list of trivia? See how many of its entries falls into the format...
Click to read more »words per hour, more or less. Trivia sections should be kept to a minimum, since the preceding guidelines are paramount. Trivia, if included, should follow...
Click to read more »internet internet including these: The Buffy and Angel Trivia Guide - INVALUABLE for Buffy trivia (though beware that registered users submit information...
Click to read more »mainly of unferenced and lenghty trivia info of which some can be merged to Gilgamesh article. Delete per WP:TRIVIA and WP:V --JForget 23:34, 12 July...
Click to read more »like this are just dumping grounds, to help the main article be "clean" of trivia. If any are notable: put them in the main article and keep an eye on the...
Click to read more »tccsdnew 12:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC) Too much trivia - almost everything in the article seems to be basically trivia, about what chart positions her singles...
Click to read more »(Marvel Comics) article (see the talk page) because it was trivia. An article only about trivia is not notable and the one reference for this entire article...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Unacceptable trivia collection (WP:FIVE: "Wikipedia is not a trivia collection"), far overshadowed by the main article...
Click to read more »Let's stop prioritizing trivia already. (And to pre-empt your comment about trivia being a "personal opinion": so is "not trivia". The point being that...
Click to read more »trivial list of... well... trivia. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 12:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - Trivia collection, WP:5 - Every...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a huge list of trivia. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »encyclopedia value. The vast majority of it is either original research or mere trivia, neither of which should be presented on Wikipedia. The Enchanted article...
Click to read more »topics and trivia dump. Otto4711 21:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Comment: The current content of this article is unsourced and loosely-associated trivia. However...
Click to read more »introduction cleanup Wikipedia articles in need of updating Articles with trivia sections Proposed deletion Articles with a promotional tone Articles lacking...
Click to read more »article that violates WP:IPC, WP:GNG, WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:TRIVIA. The short prose section is poorly referenced and has WP:OR issues, and...
Click to read more »log) Another instance of a ridiculous self-aggrandizing, purposeless WP:TRIVIA list. There is no greater relationship between these songs; they are no...
Click to read more »various media. A simple trivia collection, not permitted per WP:FIVE. --Eyrian 18:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Strong delete as a list of trivia, unsourced and unmaintainable...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Trivia collection, amounting to little more than "Judas's name is often used to...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) POV fork, trivia page, clearly unencyclopedic, clearly POV and WP:FRINGE article name. Senior...
Click to read more »Lists espeicially Trivia list are Definitely not Encyclopedic Sawblade05 22:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Delete as per listcruft trivia. I would have said...
Click to read more »general trivia section" ... but this eight-year-old set has nothing to do with new or expanded articles, so its only effect is as a WP:TRIVIA section...
Click to read more »and the list deleted. It is just an unmaintainable, unreferenced list of trivia. - Zeibura (Talk) 23:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per Nom On Wikipedia did...
Click to read more »list The "trivia" section should be reduced as much as possible, preferably by incorporating the material elsewhere in the article. If it's trivia, it's by...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) A meaningless collection of WP:TRIVIA about Aleister Crowley. This should be deleted as an article bound to be...
Click to read more »Delete - Why Michael Jackson? The bottom line is that this is trivia for the sake of trivia. Carrite (talk) 01:43, 17 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »again, the point is not even about trivia and its relation to wikipedia in general, but about using trivia and trivia in an attempt to validate a topic...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Miscellaneous WP:TRIVIA largely unsourced for the the names are not significantly notable. - CHAMPION...
Click to read more »removing non-notable examples of things no one needs explained. Convert trivia sections into freakin' brilliant prose. Shorten plot synopses. Identify...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#DIR Jay32183 23:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - this is a laundry list of trivia all loosely related to Behemoth. For instance: "Behemoth" is a huge AS (Arms...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Per WP:FIVE, wikipeida is not a trivia collection. This article is just full of trivia. Wikipedia should not be the place to document every...
Click to read more »start a new wikiproject for trivia and popular culture references. I know the official policy is to incorporate the trivia sections into the main text...
Click to read more »do anything that {{trivia}} doesn't do. PC78 23:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Keep trivia talk, it's ugly compared to the new Trivia template, but has the...
Click to read more »collection of trivia; see also WP:POPCULTURE. I see no room for improvement of this article. --B. Wolterding 11:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Delete, trivia. >Radiant<...
Click to read more »article that violates WP:IPC, WP:GNG, WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:TRIVIA. It has a bit of a prose, suggesting there is something to be said about...
Click to read more »log) not really a huge list of trivia like the other "IPC" articles, but basically an overblown hodgepodge of trivia and cruft about times he has appeared...
Click to read more »general trivia section" ... but this over ten-year-old set has nothing to do with new or expanded articles, so its only effect is as a WP:TRIVIA section...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) First, it's trivia and a violation of WP:IINFO. (Plus, the respective article already has a...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete This article is a trivia section. "miscellany" is another word for trivia, see Wikipedia:TRIVIA: "A number of articles contain lists...
Click to read more »person's "trivia" is another person's bit of DYK for the Main Page. The guideline Wikipedia:Trivia sections is about trivia sections, not trivia in general...
Click to read more »This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Full article is a "trivia section". Has no regular section. Georgia guy (talk) 23:36, 24 March 2008...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) giant trivia fork, just a long list of times various parts of 2001 have been parodied...
Click to read more »fancruft and WP:V.--ZayZayEM 01:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP is not a trivia colletion Corpx 01:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC) Rename obviously a list and not...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced list of trivia, failing WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:GNG. ansh666 01:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Discussion summarization; Twitter bots tracking government edits; extracting trivia from Wikipedia In the media Google's Ideological Echo Chamber; What makes...
Click to read more »PictureTrivia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »Delete Pure trivia. No encyclopedic merit. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC) Delete. Needless trivia. Ajf773 (talk)...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:TRIVIA: This is a trivial association. "Exoskeleton" is not a genre or storytelling...
Click to read more »per minute Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Add {{trivia}} to trivia sections with over 512 bytes of info, I read over Android's BRFA and...
Click to read more »Indiscriminate, trivia, loosely associated topics, etc. Resolute 04:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Delete as this couldn't even be in Pulp Fiction (film) per WP:TRIVIA.--...
Click to read more »(UTC) There is agreement on the article to split, in line with WP:Handling trivia and Wikipedia:"In popular culture" articles. Wapondaponda (talk) 19:54,...
Click to read more »general trivia section" ... but this overwhelmingly ancient set has nothing to do with new or expanded articles, so its only effect is as a WP:TRIVIA section...
Click to read more »separate list page just for this trivia. Mattximus (talk) 16:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC) What are you guys defining as trivia? This is a pretty compact list...
Click to read more »course by definition, trivia is trivial is a triviality. Note that I do not say it is anything more than trivia, but as trivia it is interesting. I won't...
Click to read more »at death" and "Academy Award winner/nominee") which is also statistical trivia. Unsourced WP:OR. The article is a deeply confusing series of tables and...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Unsourced trivia (WP:RS, WP:N, WP:TRIVIA that was created without attribution and still has all the problems...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is WP:TRIVIA plain and simple. It is WP:OR that can quickly be deduced from looking at...
Click to read more »computer lab room 4041 - all are welcome. March 14, 2012 - MWiki 2nd Annual Trivia Night! Answers can be found here. May 1, 2011 - The 2011-2012 Editing Challenge...
Click to read more »obscure villages, railway stations, little known bugs, and entertainment trivia. Praemonitus (talk) 22:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC) It is only a small sample...
Click to read more »is referenced, parodied, mentioned or alluded to. It is trivia and Wikipedia is not a trivia repository. The "influenced by" section is particularly egregious...
Click to read more »to the second). Trivia. Delete. Terrapin 20:54, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC) Delete. Trivia -67.42.143.188 22:16, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC) Delete. Trivia and unverifiable...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced trivia (possibly in violation of the original research policy); Wikipedia is not...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Another pure WP:TRIVIA page that has no notability on its own. Any of actual significance belong...
Click to read more »stated by other Wikipedians, the "Trivia" and "Cultural References" sections are poor. All the info within the trivia section needs to be incorporated...
Click to read more »trivial list of... well... trivia. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 12:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - Trivia collection, WP:5 - Every...
Click to read more »not a trivia collection". --Eyrian 22:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Comment Isn't Five Pillars more of an overview of policy than actual policy? The trivia link...
Click to read more »whatever problem there may be. Trivia - Per WP:TRIVIA, trivia is not recommended. Please try to incorporate relevant trivia into the rest of the article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms Wikipedia:Trivia sections Jimbo Wales on trivia See WP:IDONTLIKEIT Fancruft Listcruft Call a spade a spade...
Click to read more »deal with bloated trivia sections in articles is to purge them, not to split them out into whole new "articles" with nothing but trivia. Guy (Help!) 15:02...
Click to read more »Delete: it's a mere trivia. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 08:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Take a moment to read the trivia guideline you linked...
Click to read more »popular culture section might also fail criteria 3b, going into excessive trivia based on questionable sources (1, 2, and The Daily Mirror are not WP:RS...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Trivia list of things that barely use more than the name and a vague hellish association...
Click to read more »an unspecified period). The bulk of the article is made up of a list of trivia, little of which is of any interest to anyone but a hardcore Yankovic fan...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) A page of WP:TRIVIA about Leprechauns. Nothing worth merging back to Leprechaun in my opinion...
Click to read more »Cultural References here (if any) ==Trivia/Goofs== *List Trivia/Goofs Here (if any) <!--Please try to incorporate trivia into the rest of the article instead...
Click to read more »trivia...it is indeed trivial, and may not be worth keeping. — jdorje (talk) 03:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC) It is generally frowned upon to put trivia...
Click to read more »separate list page just for this trivia. Mattximus (talk) 16:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC) What are you guys defining as trivia? This is a pretty compact list...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Trivia without analysis, often sharing little more than the name with the myth...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Indiscriminate collection of trivia. Lacks any kind of useful or sourced analysis. --Eyrian 18:06, 25 July 2007...
Click to read more »deciding of the World Championship since 1960, it's essentially trivia and duplicated trivia at that. --Falcadore (talk) 03:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC) All of...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)– (View log) Delete as per WP:Trivia. Apparently I have to do this myself since the nominator of the article...
Click to read more »content is unencyclopedic trivia. "prod" tag previously removed without justification. Hqb 06:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Delete the trivia and keep everything else...
Click to read more »If "trivia" was genuinely singular, then it would have a plural of its own, "trivias". Looie496 (talk) 16:57, 7 July 2015 (UTC) As a word, "trivia" is...
Click to read more »needs more. Goldfritha 00:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Also, some of the trivia is -- not trivia. Work it into text. Goldfritha 00:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »with bloated trivia sections in articles is to prune them, not to sp[lit them out into whole new "articles" comprised of nothing but trivia, especially...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Unacceptable trivia, per WP:FIVE (or WP:NOT#IINFO if you prefer). Eyrian 18:49, 1 August 2007...
Click to read more »March 2010 (UTC) Delete - trivia. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 01:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC) Delete - Trivia. Eklipse (talk) 07:55, 13 March...
Click to read more »How do users make this article an FA? Are the trivia portions necessary? Real96 19:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC) The article seems great! Lots of refs Covers...
Click to read more »crackberry.com/mobileqs-trivia-game-updated-adding-more-expansion-packs http://crackberry.com/challenge-your-mind-mobileqs-trivia-game-50-copies-be-won...
Click to read more »character information from the game article from which it comes mixed with trivia. It is therefore duplicative and unnnotable on its own and should be deleted...
Click to read more »be created discussing these. Please, please, please no trivia sections. See Wikipedia:Trivia and Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD as guidelines continue...
Click to read more »decided that if something qualifies as "trivia" then no serious person wants to find out about it. But knowing the trivia about a subject aids in a holistic...
Click to read more »Mohamed Ouda - 1,112 EdSaperia - 1,109 Sky Harbor - 1,069 Saileshpat - 1,010 (Trivia: 4,620 voted "neutral" in support of Peteforsyth who had withdrawn shortly...
Click to read more »useful. Trivia is interesting, but certainly does not belong here. the_undertow talk 22:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC) Delete as another list of trivia with little...
Click to read more »"Pam's Replacement" "Gettysburg" "Mrs. California" "Christmas Wishes" "Trivia" "Pool Party" "Jury Duty" "Special Project" "Tallahassee" "After Hours"...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) This is likely an incomplete list but it is only trivia for the most part which WP is NOT and it is also a stub and unsourced. Most...
Click to read more »"include trivia" either. And I don't like the word "trivia" which I think prejudges the issue. But it may be impossible to avoid it. "WP:Trivia in articles"...
Click to read more »beyond trivia. Pascal.Tesson 23:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Someone please create WikiTrivia, and we could transwiki all of these nonsense trivia pages...
Click to read more »does not deal with "lists of trivia". That particular section of policy is quite specific on what it covers, and trivia lists are not part of it. In fact...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Unacceptable trivia collection, per WP:FIVE and WP:NOT#IINFO. Since the Triangle is fundamentally...
Click to read more »information is trivial, and essentially trivia. It violates WP:TRIVIA, WP:AVTRIV (what with being essentially a trivia section in disguise as an article)....
Click to read more »March 2010 (UTC) Delete - even if the trivia is integrated into the article, WP:TRIVIA discourages sections of trivia. Thus the redirect would be misleading...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Trivia list. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 01:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »The bigger problem though is that I feel that this just a trivia article (see WP:TRIVIA). I have not heard of this concept before, and while I think...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Trivia collection, composed of bare-mention references. Gives no further understanding...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete - another laundry list trivia dump directory of random examples of Indian martial arts or weaponry or...
Click to read more »a guideline, and the community can overrule it. It's not a trivia section as per WP:TRIVIA because the items listed forms a logical group. The article...
Click to read more »fails WP:NOT#DIR Jay32183 20:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Delete, indiscriminate trivia collection per WP:FIVE. --Eyrian 20:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Delete. Grab-bag...
Click to read more »Kicking222 13:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Delete A dozen non-notable, unreferenced trivia facts do not add up to a legitimate article. -- Kicking222 13:39, 5 August...
Click to read more »WP:TRIVIA "This guideline does not suggest removing trivia sections" --W.marsh 19:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC) WP:V suggests removing unsourced trivia, though...
Click to read more »integrity is very low in the section, in addition to it containing lots of trivia. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC) Could you tag...
Click to read more »around this particular set of lists, but my initial reaction is they are WP:TRIVIA. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »regarding WP:TRIVIA. TRIVIA doesn't apply because it is about trivia sections in articles, and (as indicated at the end of the intro) not whether trivia belongs...
Click to read more »list of... well... trivia. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 12:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Strong delete bad trivia. Like Otto says,...
Click to read more »cannot stand alone as it is merely made up of (mainly unsourced) passing trivia. I have tried to find secondary sources on this topic, and I failed. There's...
Click to read more »Delete per WP is not a trivia collection or a directory Corpx 01:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC) Delete wikipedia is not the place for trivia. Oysterguitarist 03:00...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC) Delete as trivia. The length of song titles on one particular chart does seem a bit indiscriminate...
Click to read more »and WP:TRIVIA and many more.--JForget 02:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC) Keep does not violate WP:NOT, as the only advice that policy gives on trivia is to...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This seems to be a collection of trivia about the appearance of leather gloves in fiction, as satirized in this...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log) Delete as hopeless trivia. Tagged earlier for importance but it's so clearly unimportant why wait...
Click to read more »"clean up" did not happen and the article remains another laundry list trivia dump directory of loosely associated topics. Otto4711 13:45, 29 July 2007...
Click to read more »WP:IPC/MOS:POPCULTURE ("Sections with lists of miscellaneous information such as "trivia" sections should be avoided"), i.e. pretty random and mostly unreferenced...
Click to read more »articles User:Uncle G/Cargo cult encyclopaedia article writing WP:SPAMBAIT WP:TRIVIA WP:SYNTHESIS WP:WEIGHT Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists) Wikipedia:Fringe...
Click to read more »basically every natural phenomenon, and it would end up as the same list of trivia. --Haemo 04:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC) Keep this useful and interesting collection...
Click to read more »guidelines and like: as an 'in popular culture' article, WP:IPC and MOS:POPCULT/TRIVIA, as a list, WP:NLIST and WP:SALAT, as a potential topic, WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE...
Click to read more »Ianblair23 (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC) Delete per nom. Article is WP:TRIVIA. Jack | talk page 04:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC) Delete. Non-professional sports...
Click to read more »hand. Some of these should be mentioned in Legion (demon), most are just trivia. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »articles that violate WP:IPC, WP:GNG, WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:TRIVIA, this time we have the Tower of London. The important difference this time...
Click to read more »progress}} {{Self-contradictory articles progress}} {{Splitting progress}} {{Trivia progress}} {{Unreferenced BLP progress}} {{Use British English Oxford spelling...
Click to read more »Who point, if its there), and it's against WP:TRIVIA anyway. Will (talk) 21:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC) WP:TRIVIA says to get rid of lists and to source references...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Excessive trivia that is of importance only to a small population of enthusiastic fans and...
Click to read more »delete as A combination of OR and trivia. Mangoe (talk) 01:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC) Delete - Combines pure WP:OR and trivia. Hansen SebastianTalk 04:49, 11...
Click to read more »each other and nothing about the real world. Oppose merging any of this trivia into any other article. Otto4711 12:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Delete, loosely...
Click to read more »guidelines and like: as an 'in popular culture' article, WP:IPC and MOS:POPCULT/TRIVIA, as a list, WP:NLIST and WP:SALAT, as a potential topic, WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE...
Click to read more »reliable sources as significant in its particular field. References that cite trivia do not fulfill this requirement. See following section for more information...
Click to read more »no reliable sources, OR, violates WP:TRIVIA. Corvus cornix 01:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Delete, no merge - trivia, cruft, nonsense, whatever your favorite...
Click to read more »peevishness. Trivia dragged out and placed into a standalone article is still trivia, and as such is embraced by the spirit of WP:TRIVIA. Eusebeus (talk)...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Similar to trivia sections Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. See Wikipedia:Trivia sectionsCs california (talk)...
Click to read more »Canuckian89. And the nomination's complaint that this is "trivial...trivia... WP:TRIVIA" is both mistaken and opinionated contrary to policy WP:NPOV. Andrew🐉(talk)...
Click to read more »useful, but they are ultimately of little or no academic encyclopedic value. Trivia should be saved for sites such as www.imdb.com, or, if pertinent in some...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) This list is the epitome of trivia. It collects a number of factoids that have no significance whatsoever to...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Unreferenced plot summary and trivia. I realize that lists are more or less a compromise for non-notable topics...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A non encyclopedic collection of trivia. Significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:47, 31 August...
Click to read more »and the intro kept me interested. Moving some of the intro information to trivia prevents the reader from getting bored from reading a long introduction...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Contentless WP:TRIVIA, WP:LISTCRUFT. Not a directory WP:NOT. Bulldog123 (talk) 22:28, 12 September...
Click to read more »policy that forbids excessive listings of statistics) and WP:Manual of Style/Trivia sections. Wikipedia:Featured lists Portal:Contents/Lists Lists of topics...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTABILITY; completely unmanageable - should include, for starters...
Click to read more »Is not a trivia collection. I definitely see this article as a collection of trivia. Indexing what's mentioned in a song's lyrics is trivia. Corpx 02:26...
Click to read more »potentially notable topic that is sadly just a mostly unreferenced list of trivia in the TV trope like style (even IF sources exist, which I couldn't confirm...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Trivia, lot of references to IMDb which is unreliable Indagate (talk) 15:25, 28...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject...
Click to read more »First, this level of detail is rather off the deep end when it comes to trivia. (Though it would be great content if somebody starts Where in the Wiki...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) - (View log) Why do we need articles on such trivia? Drat (Talk) 23:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC) We don't. It's not encyclopedic...
Click to read more »list fails the very basics of our WP:FIVE pillars as loosely associated trivia, and despite being nominated for deletion previously, continues to fail...
Click to read more »of unrelated trivia. Doesn't belong in Antimatter, either. --Calton | Talk 13:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:FIVE - Not a trivia collection. Not...
Click to read more »Link: www.purpleslinky.com/trivia/history/five-famous-diamonds.202723. * Links added in this diff: www.purpleslinky.com/trivia/history/five-famous-diamonds...
Click to read more »Oppose merging the trivia into any other article. Otto4711 12:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC) Delete, mixed original research and trivia. --Eyrian 13:17, 25 July...
Click to read more »trivial list of... well... trivia. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 12:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - Trivia collection, WP:5 - Every...
Click to read more »own article. This "we need a trivia dump" mentaility is what's led to this mess in the first place. Every time a trivia or "in popular culture" section...
Click to read more »Class criteria A neutral, well-written well-referenced article, without trivia that cannot be integrated. No major cleanup tags (see Category:Article message...
Click to read more »WP:TNTing. Unlike most such lists aka poorly unreferenced collection of trivia in the form list of works that mention MIT, this has big chunks of prose...
Click to read more »,but I got rid of a trivia section before. I think you must mean the Outside of Star Wars section I moved most of the old trivia section into it if it...
Click to read more »directory. Will (talk) 16:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - Mostly uncited trivia. Oli Filth 17:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Note: I recalled seeing this article...
Click to read more »baseball players, whether a subject is left-handed or right-handed is pure trivia, and not at all something these men are prominently noted for. Snuggums...
Click to read more »unreferenced list of trivia. Fails - take your pick, multiple choice answers allowed: WP:IPC, WP:GNG, WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:TRIVIA, WP:OR, WP:V.....
Click to read more »show. It is inherently original research and consists of nothing but fan trivia. Reyk YO! 08:13, 7 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Wikipedia is not a collection of unsourced trivia items. MER-C 09:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Merge This needs to be merged...
Click to read more »collection of information and a directory of loosely-associated pieces of trivia. Article seeks to capture any mention of TPIR, Bob Barker, something that...
Click to read more »this kind of list). --Eyrian 20:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Delete as per WP:TRIVIA. No sources, OR, nothing but a list of disjointed references. Corvus cornix...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Copyrights Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) Wikipedia:Manual of Style Wikipedia:Trivia sections Violation of certain rules, such as copyright, is grounds for immediate...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was delete as listcruft and trivia. Daniel Case 02:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Tanuki in popular culture (edit |...
Click to read more »22:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC) Second nomination. Cruft. Essentially just a trivia page. Any actually useful information should be moved to the Samurai Jack...
Click to read more »list of WP:TRIVIA with no discernible evidence of notability." Yaksar (let's chat) 00:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC) Delete as pointless trivia. Carrite (talk)...
Click to read more »deletion that I find the weakest is the Trivia claim. WP in WP:HTRIVIA states the following in its first sentence: Trivia is broadly defined as information...
Click to read more »popular culture type articles contains a lenghty of unsourced trivia material Delete per WP:TRIVIA and WP:V--JForget 23:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Merge relevant...
Click to read more »a general trivia section" ... but this decade-old set has nothing to do with new or expanded articles, so its only effect is as a WP:TRIVIA section. Portals...
Click to read more »(US game show). It would completely unbalance the article and enormous trivia sections are to be avoided. Otto4711 20:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete, created contrary to WP:TRIVIA, no apparent effort to make it anything other than an OR trivia dump, no sources relevant to the subject...
Click to read more »WP:LISTCRUFT, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:TRIVIA, This article consists of nothing but an indiscriminate list of irrelevant trivia rather than what an article or...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Irrelevant trivia collection. Doesn't even bother with an intro. --Eyrian 14:50, 26 July 2007...
Click to read more »Everything else listed here is superfluous, unsourced, WP:INDISCRIMINATE trivia that does not need to be covered on Wikipedia. There is nothing showing...
Click to read more »trivial list of... well... trivia. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 12:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - Trivia collection, WP:5 - Every...
Click to read more »Delete: Per WP:TRIVIA. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 09:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC) Comment: WP:TRIVIA does not apply here, as it refers to trivia sections within...
Click to read more »seems to me that it could never be anything other than a collection of trivia. Which is why I would argue it should go. Maybe there are bits that could...
Click to read more »per WP:TRIVIA.-- aBSuRDiST -T J C- 04:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Delete Per WP:FIVE and others. Crazysuit 05:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Delete pure trivia - WP:FIVE...
Click to read more »TWL) I question the utility of this list. It is essentially an expanded trivia item - "which animal has the most bones?" - that currently is set up as...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Trivia collection, often consisting of name-only references. Unacceptable per WP:FIVE...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:IPC, these lists of indiscriminate trivia are supposed to be well sourced. This one isn't. Being spun off like this...
Click to read more »per WP is not a trivia collection in WP:FIVE Corpx 06:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC) Keep. Quite frankly, I fail to see why this is simply trivia. The fact that...
Click to read more »guidelines and like: as an 'in popular culture' article, WP:IPC and MOS:POPCULT/TRIVIA, as a list, WP:NLIST and WP:SALAT, as a potential topic, WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE...
Click to read more »opinion on the inclusion of the trivia about the shared birthdate, and a summary of Vincent's behavior's here On adding trivia to the main body of an article...
Click to read more »man5 23:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC) Object, Still has a stub section and a trivia section, so not quite there yet. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 15:04, 12 December...
Click to read more »regarding stand-alone lists, indiscriminate collections of information, trivia and the general notability guideline. The vast majority of the examples...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:TRIVIA, WP:OR. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:55, 3 November 2011 (UTC) Delete as trivial...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) A meaningless collection of WP:TRIVIA about The Picture of Dorian Gray. This should be deleted as an article bound...
Click to read more »I'm not sure this list serves any encyclopaedic purpose other than being trivia driven. Megan1967 19:50, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) Keep, per my copied-and-pasted...
Click to read more »Programming Language(s): C Function Summary: The bot will add 'place=top' to trivia tags at the top of the article. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily,...
Click to read more »footnotes, this fails WP:IPC, WP:OR, WP:GNG, WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:TRIVIA as well as WP:V. And to repeat myself, we already have a properly written...
Click to read more »Beyond seeking money from investors, how does HQ Trivia make money? I am unclear how the business model is sustainable because it seems like all they do...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2016 March 7 Steve Shutt Movie Trivia Movie Trivia Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2016 March 8 The...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles#Check your fiction Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) Wikipedia:Image...
Click to read more »deletion seem more consistent with policy in this case. In addition to NOT and TRIVIA, the article's poor focus condemns it to an irredeemable hodgepodge of original...
Click to read more »bad WP:TRIVIA Bulldog123 04:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:TRIVIA and unreferenced. ~ Wikihermit 04:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:TRIVIA. Oysterguitarist...
Click to read more »information, Wikipedia is not a directory of loosely-associated topics and trivia sections are to be avoided either within articles or as free-standing articles...
Click to read more »14:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Delete and Oppose Merge. It isn't close to trivia. It is trivia and shouldn't be merged. -- Whpq (talk) 16:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »logs | views) - (View log) Delete trivia. This article, which needs serious cleanup and verification, is crufty trivia that serves little purpose. Wryspy...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete -- indiscriminate laundry list of trivia. --Haemo 06:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Delete/Merge - Trivia collection - WP:FIVE Corpx 06:25, 24 July 2007...
Click to read more »the lists of both, her tattoos and the general trivia, comparable to articles like this: Madonna trivia. --Sloan21 14:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Please see...
Click to read more »jpg. AZ t 01:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC) Object. Mostly uncited, contains a trivia section, sections should be reordered to WP:GTL, reference formatting is...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Unacceptable trivia collection (WP:FIVE), adding nothing to the reader's understanding of the...
Click to read more »in the first paragraph, and the remaining two thirds of the article is trivia that doesn't need to be merged anyway. Black Kite 20:24, 18 November 2008...
Click to read more »– (View log) It's a mess of original research and unnecessary/pointless trivia with absolutely no sources--SUIT양복 18:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - Looks...
Click to read more »policy/guidelines, quote the actual page. Also keep in mind WP:TRIVIA which states "What makes a section "trivia", regardless of its name, is that it contains a disorganized...
Click to read more »term pretentious). As for saying that well-sourced trivia is "still trivia"- everything is trivia to someone. One person might consider 19th century US...
Click to read more »however, allow this section to become a long list of trivia. See below. Trivia Lists of trivia should be avoided; important information contained in...
Click to read more »be changed to ==Biography==. Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts...
Click to read more »- Trivia collection Corpx 17:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DIR and WP:FIVE. Otto4711 17:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete per Trivia Sawblade05...
Click to read more »marsh 17:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC) Well, I don't really like the Trivia section, or any Trivia seciton for that matter. Either rename it or find a way to incorporate...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Unacceptable trivia collection (WP:FIVE), often only referring to a single sin. A popular cultural...
Click to read more »article as relist. My opinion is weak delete, considering that this is a trivia list and per precedent. Sr13 07:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Comment I was the...
Click to read more »log) Textbook case of WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOT#DIR. Bulldog123 17:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Weak deleteWeak keep. It may be WP:TRIVIA, but at least this one would...
Click to read more »fiction, though. Geogre 14:40, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC) Delete - there's trivia and then there's trivia. This is the kind that doesn't belong. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:37, 16...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Excessive pop culture trivia - original research, and I don't think that a highly niche list of a trait...
Click to read more »Nothing pops up to show this matters in the slightest, beyond being a boring trivia fact. moluɐɯ 21:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC) Delete or rename List of U.S...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A list that is full of overdetailed trivia, verging on WP:NOT. To be fair I am not proposing that we chuck the article's...
Click to read more »Stephenb (Talk) 21:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC) Delete "Some trivia could be removed", it's all trivia. L0b0t (talk) 22:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC) Keep Completely...
Click to read more »of interest to the average reader of the music article. It should not be trivia. Coins, notes, stamps etc. in general circulation are more likely to meet...
Click to read more »Badger Drink (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC) Delete. Seems like trivia to me, and trivia that has it's own page. [mad pierrot][t c] 06:32, 16 July 2009...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Only notable as a very long answer to a trivia question. Power~enwiki (talk) 03:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »unsourced trivia article, with no pretentions of being an article. We already have Garuda (disambiguation). This is a list of very minor trivia, mostly...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Trivia collection, adding nothing to an understanding of modern perceptions. Unacceptable...
Click to read more »team started going to trivia at the Chapter House in Ithaca, NY after practices using CCCP as their team name. The CCCP trivia team repeatedly achieved...
Click to read more »variety of {{fact}} tags. Lead is insufficient (two sentences). Bloated trivia section ("In Marvel's Transformers comics continuity, Optimus Prime's personality...
Click to read more »seems clear-cut. A list of songs about telephones would probably be random trivia anyway. But as the talk page says, most of these songs aren't even about...
Click to read more »guidelines and like: as an 'in popular culture' article, WP:IPC and MOS:POPCULT/TRIVIA, as a list, WP:NLIST and WP:SALAT, as a potential topic, WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per WP:TRIVIA. This is a completely trivial list based on perceived language skills. How...
Click to read more »appalled by the lack of context. The "plot summary" is two sentences. The trivia section is longer than the plot summary. There are no less than four five...
Click to read more »entirely unconstructive and pointless – in policy terms, it is indiscriminate trivia. A list of computer programs whose names are offensive to the disabled is...
Click to read more »Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Delete. Just trivia. Sgroupace (talk) 11:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Delete - Mindless "cool pic...
Click to read more »topics deemed subjectively by Wikipedians to be trivia are inherently non-notable; WP:TRIVIA refers to "Trivia" sections in articles and does not apply here...
Click to read more »17 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. Pure collection of trivia. Zero Kitsune (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Trivia is encyclopedic. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des...
Click to read more »recently-deleted List of Firefly slang words. 2) This is trivia. It is all trivia about the same thing, but it is trivia nonetheless. 3) The fact that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS...
Click to read more »although that editor really should know by now that lists of unsourced trivia are not particularly welcome on Wikipedia. Otto4711 (talk) 02:50, 3 January...
Click to read more »guidelines and like: as an 'in popular culture' article, WP:IPC and MOS:POPCULT/TRIVIA, as a list, WP:NLIST and WP:SALAT, as a potential topic, WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE...
Click to read more »May 2007 (UTC) Delete as utter trivia. Mangoe 13:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC) Delete articles which only consist of a trivia section. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:52, 4...
Click to read more »what I consider trivia and not. 1. Articles about playmate autograph signing, trivia. 2. Articles about playmate appearances, trivia. 3. Articles about...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is nothing but a collection of trivia. The utter lack of reliable sources strongly suggests that compiling information...
Click to read more »work on this article; but as for now, object. As of now, it is listy, has trivia sections, few footnotes, improper licensing, etc. Not quite Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »result was keep. Adequate sourcing is present. With regard to WP:TRIVIA, from WP:TRIVIA#What this guideline is not: "This guideline does not suggest the...
Click to read more »however, allow this section to become a long list of trivia. See below. Trivia Lists of trivia should be avoided; the information contained in such a...
Click to read more »Thealternate claimant trivia bit and the name section should be cited Too much direct quotations in regard to the lenght of the article. Trivia could be easily...
Click to read more »that articles like this should never be created, but rather the problem of trivia should be addressed within an article like Anne Frank, without creating...
Click to read more »(View log) Article essentially contains trivia-like information that are not sourced. Delete per WP:V and WP:TRIVIA --JForget 23:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »unsourceable trivia (IMDB and some blogs are not reliable sources).--70.80.234.196 (talk) 04:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC) Delete - This is a trivia list. If there...
Click to read more »log) Again, Wikipedia is not a place to throw a trivia collection list like that. Delete per trivia cruft--JForget 23:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Delete,...
Click to read more »(UTC) Game trivia, delete. Gazpacho 13:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) Merge per WP:FICT. Radiant_* 15:18, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC) Delete, minor game trivia, Wikipedia...
Click to read more »actually seems to be trying to be an encyclopedia article, and not a list of trivia. So, I guess I would be saying "trim and merge all". --Haemo 21:30, 25 July...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List of unsourced trivia that violates WP:EPISODE and WP:IINFO. See similar AFDs for lists of game...
Click to read more »park itself, rather than just advertisements, would add to the article. Trivia sections are also bad form. The points there should either be merged elsewhere...
Click to read more »only the movie/book/game itself, so it's an indiscriminate collection of trivia. And not to mention the original research ("oh look, I saw this EMP missile...
Click to read more »doubt that there will be a flury of activity to fill this article with trivia, though. Thryduulf 23:48, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete. Obvious advert for a...
Click to read more »expecting Radiant to archive all of these deleted trivia articles on his/her computer to restore when WikiTrivia is created! ;) Keep. Despite the trivial, it...
Click to read more »delete. Between the original research issue and the fact that this list is trivia, the consensus is for deletion. Courcelles 22:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »take your pick from WP:IPC, WP:GNG, WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:TRIVIA. Also WP:V, given much of it is unreferenced. The list includes plenty of...
Click to read more »listed it. --Iamunknown 04:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Mostly unsourced trivia. Resolute 05:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Some of the nicknames are unsourced...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mostly unsourced string of trivia, bordering on WP:SYNTH, WP:OR, and WP:CRUFT. Particularly noteworthy achievements...
Click to read more »of trivia. A similar article on Around The Horn was previously deleted. Dannycali 21:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC) Delete I haven't seen so much trivia in...
Click to read more »that the list is "trivial" but that's not really a policy or guideline (WP:TRIVIA is but from the discussion it's not clear that it would actually apply)...
Click to read more »things: -Burn the Trivia section, then spit on its corpse. Sorry to be so brusque, but this article will not reach FA with a Trivia section. -An article...
Click to read more »These may be considered WP:LISTCRUFT by failing to meet WP:IINFO and WP:TRIVIA. The most significant accolades are already found in the awards and nominations...
Click to read more »16:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC) Delete as trivia. --FateClub 16:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC) That is clutching at straws; WP:TRIVIA is an essay. Please explain what...
Click to read more »describing them, including everything relevant and leaving out all the everyday trivia that is not really necessary to understand the context. You have to use...
Click to read more »Otto4711 05:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC) Delete (again) because this is purely a trivia collection. The content of the article was the focus of the last AFD and...
Click to read more »I am not sure whether the right solution is deletion or to remove the trivia and see what is left. I note that the vast majority of the edits are by...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete, looks like trivia. Anything worth keeping can be merged into main article. It's just going to be a trivia magnet otherwise. --Belovedfreak...
Click to read more »death" and "former political office holder") which are also statistical trivia and which fail to cite a single source, thus mot meeting either of WP:V...
Click to read more »exists because someone thought astronaut trivia "cool". It is based on no reliable sources, as nobody but trivia space websites have published such lists...
Click to read more »loosely associated by the passing mention of The Lion King. It is essentially trivia, which should be avoided. Much of the content in the article is based on...
Click to read more »2004 (UTC) Delete - trivia - Andre Engels 15:10, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) Keep. Trivia, sure, but what's unencyclopedic about trivia? Trivia is in the eye of the...
Click to read more »articles#Education. --4.253.37.16 15:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC) One more comment The "trivia" section probably shouldn't exist to become a featured article and if it...
Click to read more »issues were raises in this, including whether it met WP:LISTN, WP:TRIVIA, whether TRIVIA was relevant for determining the actual retention of content, along...
Click to read more »requirements and can not stand alone outside of the main article. Much of it is trivia information or self-sourcing. Some info could possibly be merged into the...
Click to read more »list article) if they are of encyclopedic interest, not indiscriminate trivia. These guidelines do not supersede the general notability guideline (WP:GNG)...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) nn trivia fancruft that was forked off a main article. Much of it is pure OR and speculation...
Click to read more »October 2008 (UTC) Delete our articles aren't meant to be collections of trivia. This is altogether unencyclopedic: can you imagine Britannica ever including...
Click to read more »disagree on the trivia section, and I wouldn't be terribly sorry to see it go. (I've worked over several other articles to merge their Trivia lists into other...
Click to read more »of trivia to any other article. Otto4711 14:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:ATRIV was made for a reason. Delete this along with all the other trivia articles...
Click to read more »who spotted it. This list of trivia tells us nothing about the building, nothing about the fiction that contains the trivia, nothing about their interrelationship...
Click to read more »block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) The Trivia Man (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Convincing argument that this violates WP:TRIVIA and WP:OR. Liz Read! Talk! 03:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Delete - both as non-notable trivia. Fenix down (talk) 11:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC) Delete - total trivia. If a celebrity's devotion to a club...
Click to read more »completely unsourced article and nothing more than a collection of Star Trek trivia. It belongs on Memory Alpha, not here. There have been two prior AFDs. The...
Click to read more »this. As it stands, the list is barely sourced and full of WP:OR and WP:TRIVIA lists and does not even contain a full list of Popes and their age. Vladimir...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Collection of random trivia about Jeopardy!. The Jeopardy! article has an abbreviated "popular culture"...
Click to read more »fancruft, unlikely to expand significantly, only linked together based on trivia — Irk Come in for a drink! 05:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Delete, shouldn't be...
Click to read more »should be in the Issac Newton article. As for WP:Trivia, this doesn't quite fall into this category. Trivia "should be avoided" and "is better presented in...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) trivia fork, violates WP:NOT of indiscriminate trivial info. A rash of "in popular...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. This is nothing more than a trivia section presented as a stand alone article. Delete all trivia. What is the point? SilkTork 20:54, 5 August...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Excessive pop culture trivia - article relies heavily on unreliable sources such as IMDB, WhoSampled...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnecessary piece of list of trivia that is no different from all these retro lists that come and goes here...
Click to read more »established beyond her exceptional longevity. The article consists solely of trivia about oldest people who came before or after her. We have tables for this...
Click to read more »of fiction, often directly as opposed to tangentally. Some of the micro-trivia could usefully be stripped, though.ELIMINATORJR 22:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »log) More laundry-list trivia. Unacceptable per WP:FIVE. Eyrian 21:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Delete as a pure laundry list of trivia, totally unreferenced...
Click to read more »Oppose: 1) Poor lead, not detailing much about the series at all; 2) The trivia section is the only part that is well referenced. I've not looked much further...
Click to read more »to quote WP:N here. For reasons grounded in reality, it's a magnet for trivia, and I doubt that any references or notability can be presented. Charles...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Interesting, yes, but essentially trivia. Besides, it's arbitrary: Who decides what should be included on the list...
Click to read more »little or no real world relevance. Consists entirely of plot fragments and trivia. Corporation Cart (talk) 12:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »comparisons to how each individual author portrayed Poison Ivy. Additionally, the trivia section needs swift addressing. Integrate noteworthy info into appropriate...
Click to read more »being overwhelmed by trivia" is not a good reason to create a new article, the proper solution IMO is simply to trim the amount of trivia so that it doesn't...
Click to read more »notable in it's own right. However, on the delete side, they mention WP:TRIVIA, which is a guideline and not a policy (though personally, I think it a...
Click to read more »imagine this info having any use besides mere trivia... and not even the fun/interesting kind of trivia either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:18, Mar...
Click to read more »it "trivia". There's no trivia here in the sense of lists of random information or tangentially-related facts. It's a stretch to apply WP:TRIVIA to this...
Click to read more »