This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
avoided in titles; see § Article title format above. Shortcut WP:TITLETMWP:TITLETM Article titles follow standard English text formatting in the case of trademarks...
Click to read more »label? Resolving article title policy conflicts between MOS:TM, MOS:CT, WP:TITLETM, WP:RS, and WP:COMMONNAME A condition for "deliberate" branding of trademarks...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC) Article title also appears to violate WP:TITLETM. The spelling with the trademark is not demonstrably the most common usage...
Click to read more »for article titles WP:TITLES is against all capitals. Specifically, WP:TITLETM states "Items in full or partial uppercase (such as Invader ZIM) should...
Click to read more »I can't find any specific policy against using "™" in a page title. WP:TITLETM doesn't prohibit it, MOS:TM says "Do not use the ™ and ® symbols, or similar...
Click to read more »f_Style/Trademarks#RFC_to_resolve_conflict_between_MOS:TM.2C_MOS:CT_WP:TITLETM_WP:RS_WP:COMMONNAME Gaijin42 (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC) I urge...
Click to read more »clarification to avoid interpretational conflict between MOS:TM and WP:TITLETM. Abstract: A recurrent interpretational confusion suggests we need a clarification...
Click to read more »Eagleash (talk) 01:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC) No, this should not be done. WP:TITLETM says "Article titles follow standard English text formatting in the case...
Click to read more »policy. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC) @Mz7: it was a WP:TITLETM question on a stylization, where policy prefers standard English unless...
Click to read more »and Overturners to the application of WP:TITLETM is also fluff. Such a rigid and unyielding adherence to TITLETM as their rationale fundamentally ignores...
Click to read more »label? Resolving article title policy conflicts between MOS:TM, MOS:CT, WP:TITLETM, WP:RS, and WP:COMMONNAME A condition for "deliberate" branding of trademarks...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC) Article title also appears to violate WP:TITLETM. The spelling with the trademark is not demonstrably the most common usage...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC) Article title also appears to violate WP:TITLETM. The spelling with the trademark is not demonstrably the most common usage...
Click to read more »of Style/Trademarks#RFC to resolve conflict between MOS:TM, MOS:CT WP:TITLETM WP:RS WP:COMMONNAME (initiated 7 February 2014)? The discussion is listed...
Click to read more »may be that the disambiguated name should be Spades (software). See WP:TITLETM and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:10...
Click to read more »referring to? WP:V and WP:TITLETM? I commented on both of those. There's no problem of verifiability with Deadmaus, and WP:TITLETM defers to MOS:TM, which...
Click to read more »uninvolved editor here, but it looks to me like editors are also overlooking WP:TITLETM, which says article titles should usually follow standard English forms...
Click to read more »f_Style/Trademarks#RFC_to_resolve_conflict_between_MOS:TM.2C_MOS:CT_WP:TITLETM_WP:RS_WP:COMMONNAME Gaijin42 (talk) 16:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC) ChrisGualtieri...
Click to read more »were about. The first, because the actually correct interpretation of WP:TITLETM is (and only is) to not do spelling substitutions, so "Deadmaus" would...
Click to read more »November 2023 (UTC) Endorse - consensus not to move was clear and based on WP:TITLETM. estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC) Endorse This is a regurgitation...
Click to read more »stylings that we actively try to avoid as described by WP:AT (including WP:TITLETM and WP:LOWERCASE), MOS:CAPS (including MOS:ALLCAPS, MOS:GAMECAPS, MOS:THECAPS...
Click to read more »wrong, though! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) Per WP:TITLETM it seems to be the usual COMMONNAME reasoning that applies. Gråbergs Gråa...
Click to read more »