Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
redirect from M-185. Shortcuts WP:QUALIFIERWP:QUALIFIER WP:TITLEDABWP:TITLEDAB It is not always possible to use the exact title that may be desired for...
Click to read more »policy - specifically WP:TITLEDAB at WP:AT (a policy), to which WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (a guideline) specifically defers. WP:TITLEDAB states: ... [a] title may...
Click to read more »In case the secondary topic is already mentioned in its own title (WP:TITLEDAB), one can avoid repeating the topic by typing {{redirect-distinguish|REDIRECT|ARTICLE...
Click to read more »probably won't do a full review, but here's a few random comments: Per WP:TITLEDAB, I suggest moving this to Brooklyn Dodgers 1, Boston Braves 1 Brooklyn...
Click to read more »from other subjects with the same proper name. Maybe something like: {{#titledab:Foo Bar (film)}} → "(film)" {{#titlenormal:Foo Bar (film)}} → "Foo Bar"...
Click to read more »Knowledge Graph, which doesn't make sense and directly contradicts WP:TITLEDAB. The purpose of the RM was to rectify this and move the unnecessarily disambiguated...
Click to read more »policy I've ever heard of, and it would have unacceptable results. Per WP:TITLEDAB, article titles should be unambiguous, unless there is a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC...
Click to read more »move its contents to Wikipedia:Edit tags (currently a redirect) per WP:TITLEDAB and WP:CONCISE. The proposed dab listings can be culled from the hatnotes...
Click to read more »07:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom. Glaring violation of WP:TITLEDAB. Carguychris (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC) delete. it's irredeemably...
Click to read more »–Gluonz talk contribs 02:25, 24 May 2026 (UTC) As it is a subsection of WP:TITLEDAB, that is the disambiguation policy section, of course it does not specify...
Click to read more »broadcaster was accurate, we would only use broadcaster per WP:NCPDAB and WP:TITLEDAB. There's no need for additional disambiguation/precision like sports, there's...
Click to read more »doing this by adding a parenthesised qualifier to the title is against WP:TITLEDAB, since it would not be distinguishing from any other existing article....
Click to read more »article should simply be moved to remove the unnecessary qualifier per WP:TITLEDAB (only as much detail as is necessary to distinguish one topic from another...
Click to read more »which makes this a {{r from alternative disambiguation}}, per Wikipedia:TITLEDAB. - Eureka Lott 18:13, 20 January 2026 (UTC) This is not an alternative...
Click to read more »because arguments in favor of a move had the support of WP:CONCISE, WP:TITLEDAB, WP:OVERPRECISE, WP:CONSISTENT, and other PAGs that unquestionably prefer...
Click to read more »doing this by adding a parenthesised qualifier to the title is against WP:TITLEDAB, since it would not be distinguishing from any other existing article....
Click to read more »an obvious rationale for completely discounting the people opposing. WP:TITLEDAB is policy; if a local consensus at the article were to determine that "List...
Click to read more »without moving regardless of how many of the participants support it. Per WP:TITLEDAB: It is not always possible to use the exact title that may be desired for...
Click to read more »The relevant policies are in WP:TITLE, specifically WP:COMMONNAME and WP:TITLEDAB. Off the top of my head, if the church is customarily known as "St Peter's...
Click to read more »July 2025 (UTC) Hello, @Pmckay2126. It's called a disambiguator - see WP:TITLEDAB. Where there are several articles about things (or people) with the same...
Click to read more »probably won't do a full review, but here's a few random comments: Per WP:TITLEDAB, I suggest moving this to Brooklyn Dodgers 1, Boston Braves 1 Brooklyn...
Click to read more »for a start, titles shouldn't contain unnecessary disambiguators (see WP:TITLEDAB). Also, mass change at the level of tens of articles should be discussed...
Click to read more »