This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. On Wikipedia, original research means material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no...
Click to read more »syn-gnomi.blogspot.gr: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC) Tam syn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »The following text is a proposed major reversion of WP:SYN policy. After recent attempts to rewrite Wikipedia OR editorial policy so that it might start...
Click to read more »proposed major redraft of WP:SYN policy. To take part in the ongoing discussion about this proposed redraft, please visit WP:NOR-WP:SYN talk. If you might personally...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! System Syn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »WP:SYN is unclear. According to User:Father Goose: "I've seen people invoke SYN any time a general claim is made about multiple sources, especially primary...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Syn Cole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Sýn (media corporation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC) Your description of SYN FM as a 'non-notable school activity' strongly suggests otherwise. - AmishThrasher...
Click to read more »per WP:SYN (though I admit that WP:SYN argument is close to borderline in this case). Ipsign (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2011 (UTC) I think WP:SYN is unapplicable...
Click to read more »bunch of loosely-connected incidents and makes it seem, in violation of WP:SYN, that there's some sort of media conspiracy against Chávez, when the picture...
Click to read more »big to place on the article's talk page. The charts violate WP:OR and WP:SYN. Charts were discussed on the WP:OR noticeboard, where agreement was reached...
Click to read more »SYN-RCVD stands for SYN received but what is it exactly? A state of what? --178.208.219.151 (talk) 22:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC) SYN-RCVD (fully SYN RECEIVED)...
Click to read more »users Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments Clerk note: IP blocked. Syn 00:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions Syn 00:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »January 2008 (UTC) comment I can't see a delete based on WP:SYN applying here. First, wp:syn isn't a reason to delete nor does it claim to be. It is a reason...
Click to read more »quotes of the offending material. Take extreme care with links to WP:OR, WP:Syn, WP:RS, WP:POV fork, WP:Fringe, WP:Undue, because unsupported links can be...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was delete. StarM 22:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC) SynSUN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »January 2009 (UTC) Delete Per WP:SOAP and WP:SYN. Nick-D (talk) 07:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Delete. Massive WP:SYN violation. While there are some sources...
Click to read more »Per the discussion on the talk page, this article inherently violates WP:SYN, WP:NPOV and WP:OR. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's...
Click to read more »this page. The result was delete. Kurykh 01:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC) BioSyn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »this as "Russian influence operations". There are other issues such as WP:SYN, WP:OR and the like which are still unresolved after a month, and given that...
Click to read more »soulangiana - ( wp g b ) - syn. Magnolia soulangiana Mahonia lomarifolia - ( wp g b ) Modiolastrum lateritium - ( wp g b ) - syn. Malva lasiocarpa [1] [2]...
Click to read more »article falls under WP:OR/WP:SYN at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 32. Because essay is WP:OR/WP:SYN, user page content falls under...
Click to read more »Article is 100% WP:OR or WP:SYN: "This happened in the film, and this is the actual fact". That's the very definition of WP:SYN. It appears this has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as an original research essay that is in clear violation of WP:SYN. I'm not saying that the position is wrong or that it lacks in quality but...
Click to read more »speedily deleted page. It's a flagrant breach of WP:OR and especially WP:SYN, and I feel there are serious NPOV problems, too. No reliable news source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia rule: WP:SYN. Rubikonchik (talk) 11:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC) Just to make sure everybody undrestands correctly, the violation of WP:SYN consists in...
Click to read more »Russavia to cite WP:SYN as a better reasoning to assert WP:OR, but even if he does, there is far less grounds for claims of WP:SYN when it comes to relatively...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete per nom - this is an essay, and also fails WP:OR and WP:SYN Nick-D (talk) 07:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Delete. In present state, fails...
Click to read more »successfully deleted (under PROD) due to it consisting almost entirely of SYN, OR and NEO. This view was shared by multiple users and the deleting admin...
Click to read more »from AfD any more than bad writing requires it. This appears to violate WP:SYN and WP:NOTESSAY. It was created by a WP:SPA (though a benevolent one; see...
Click to read more »push a POV. It contains original research and in particular violates WP:SYN in that it uses sources solely to push a POV. Jersey Devil (talk) 23:08,...
Click to read more »This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violation of WP:SYN. See Talk:Astigiani Wars#Title. There is no such thing as the "Astigiani...
Click to read more »condition", so there is likely also to be original research and a problem with WP:SYN. Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 22:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »vehicles and their fuel efficiency. Fails WP:NOT#STATS. Seems like WP:OR and WP:SYN. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC) Very weak delete...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:ESSAY, WP:SYN, WP:OR. Don't know how this ever passed last time, so I'm putting it up again...
Click to read more »Russavia to cite WP:SYN as a better reasoning to assert WP:OR, but even if he does, there is far less grounds for claims of WP:SYN when it comes to relatively...
Click to read more »01:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC) Delete as a clear violation of WP:NOR and WP:SYN with deliberate factual inaccuracies introduced to push a POV. —SpacemanSpiff...
Click to read more »WP:SYN exists to prevent the creation of these kind of lists? Afasmit (talk) 08:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC) In my opinion that is a problem with how WP:SYN is...
Click to read more »synergeticmaggot to this chat Filll says: syn are you there? Filll says: can yo type? Kim Bruning says: syn helo! Satyam Nayak says: syn!! xavexgoem says: me, sorry...
Click to read more »historical. Resources are a non issue, the page will still be there. — MaggotSyn 19:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Misread. The mission can still be changed at a...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Unreferenced WP:OR, WP:SYN essay, fork of Poles article, written by disruptive [1] WP:SPA. There is...
Click to read more »(UTC) Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments Clerk note: Blocked and tagged. Syn 18:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions Syn 18:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Control Protocol and redirect. (Hey, we already did it to SYN (TCP), and everybody knows that syn/ack kind of belong together) --spazure (contribs) (review)...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Looks like WP:SYN for me: it advocates the idea that "research in the Soviet Union in science...
Click to read more »appears to violate WP:SYN. --Kinu t/c 03:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete Interesting essay, but Wikipedia isn't the place for it ([[WP::SYN]]). Aleta Sing 03:47...
Click to read more »January 2013 (UTC) Keep WP:BAND Criterion#1 is fulfilled by Preston Leader, Syn, Freeza, and Beat Magazine refs. Criterion#11 is fulfilled by "All in Good...
Click to read more »to unseen character. The list is original research, or if you prefer, WP:SYN. It has no place in Wikipedia. YechielMan 16:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »improper speedy was overturned. Article fails WP:OR, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NEO, WP:SYN, WP:NOTDICDEF, and WP:INFO. L0b0t (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Vochysia thyrsoidea - ( wp g b ) Volkameria aculeata - ( wp g b ) Vriesea philippocoburgil - ( wp g b ) - syn. Vriesea philippo-coburgi Wawra - ( wp g b )...
Click to read more »practice of promoting the objectification of women, this article is built on WP:SYN. Some sources list four pageants as the top four, and from that we synthesis...
Click to read more »criteria for various universities. Such would fall foul of WP:OR and/or WP:SYN and he was advised of this. When deletion was proposed he contested this...
Click to read more »April 2007 (UTC) Sigh. You're right. This might be an application of WP:SYN. Each individual phrase can be traced to one or more sources, but combining...
Click to read more »article freely mixes WP:OR and WP:SYN with speculative nonsense. Guy (Help!) 11:14, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Delete as human WP:SYN; the only sources that deal...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete, see WP:SYN. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 02:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Remote Neural Monitoring (edit |...
Click to read more »deletions. GiantSnowman 12:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:SYN. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 12:41, 16 May 2012 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »claims. Comments by other users Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments Clerk note: Both blocked indef. Syn 01:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions...
Click to read more »that focus on this claim. The inclusion of this article in Wikipedia is WP:SYN - by using this original research as the basis of the page, the implication...
Click to read more »They are little more than a device for POV pushers to pile on a load of WP:SYN and WP:OR all under the guise of consensus. Dman727 (talk) 17:02, 28 July...
Click to read more »July 2008 (UTC) I'm still not impressed. It's still all synthesis -- WP:SYN is the reason why I nominated it for deletion in the first place. Vquex (talk)...
Click to read more »top) - Link: www.murberget.se/se-och-goera/inomhus/fasta-utstaellningar/syn-foer-saegen/barnarmar (R/Xmeta/L) 2016-02-22 11:57:28 (UTC): w:de:User:HelgeRieder...
Click to read more »(11) to Cardinal Syn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.mobylgames.com/game/cardinal-syn-cardinal-syn (R/Xmeta/L- removed)...
Click to read more »discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Delete OR, SYN Fifelfoo (talk) 14:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Keep and expand. The article...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) At best WP:SYN, at worst WP:NFT. Cannot find any references - the only external reference...
Click to read more »"sensory organs". decltype (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Delete as WP:SYN and WP:OR/off-topic. The writing about vestigial tails and dormant diseases...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#ESSAY. Jujutacular talkcontribs 04:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:SYN. Crafty (talk) 06:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »not the author, I just kicked it out of Generation Z (which is also an OR SYN mess)) Fifelfoo (talk) 07:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »research ("fabled to have a significant amount of native blood" etc) or WP:SYN (none of the cites given actually address the statements being made). Several...
Click to read more »01/01/2009 21:30:11 **SYN Flood to Host** 192.168.2.103, 49530->> 74.125.19.104, 80 (from WAN Outbound) 01/01/2009 21:17:27 **SYN Flood to Host** 192.168...
Click to read more »references doesn't mean it is not OR, but it does seem to go against WP:SYN. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Speedy Move(?) to...
Click to read more »band. Joe Chill (talk) 02:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Delete. Neither can I. Syn 03:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list...
Click to read more »sections on history and effectiveness which do not seem OR/SYN. There is no obvious AfD-type OR/SYN case to me. I agree with Anthony Appleyard's decision to...
Click to read more »concerning the violation of OR.--Aldux 14:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Delete all per WP:SYN. KissL 14:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Delete (per arguments given here. Dahn 14:44...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Fails WP:SYN, cannot find the term in any WP:RS LFaraone 02:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to compare two maps and describe the differences (FWIW, the example at WP:SYN is more an example of poor writing, undue weight, and possibly POV pushing...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Most "keep" opinions do not address the WP:SYN problems of this article, and cannot therefore be taken into account when...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This appears to me to be blatant WP:SYN. The few sources do not establish the content of the article, most of which...
Click to read more »and checkuser comments Blocked. Obvious sock is an obvious sock. – B.hotep •talk• 21:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC) Conclusions Syn 00:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Comment What, well sourced with primary sources, resulting in WP:OS and WP:SYN? And regarding the other secondary sources, I was not familiar with them...
Click to read more »Draft:Legal reasoning (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:SYN y a now-locked sockpuppet. Guy (Help!) 21:39, 13 January 2019 (UTC) We should...
Click to read more »being a violation of 1RR, the edit is also a violation of WP:BLP and WP:SYN. I'll give some brief background just to help make it clear why. During The...
Click to read more »Is the English word SAME cognate with the Greek syn? (as in syntax, symposium, etc) thanks Duomillia (talk) 03:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC) No, but it is...
Click to read more »See Defending yourself against claims. Comments by other users Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments Syn 20:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions...
Click to read more »user as author or co-author, including some as yet unpublished. Redux: WP:SYN and self-promotion. Guy (Help!) 10:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »two users giving reasons to delete. Let this ride out if anything. — MaggotSyn 01:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC) We can just wait for this MfD to close, then correctly...
Click to read more »page of a card game, violating WP:OR, WP:HOWTO, and possibly WP:NOT and WP:SYN Curb Chain (talk) 04:52, 13 April 2013 (UTC) Delete I was unable to find...
Click to read more »ChrisO (talk) 01:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per nomination. WP:OR WP:SYN. X MarX the Spot (talk) 01:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Delete--plenty of reason...
Click to read more »of the word use to support a conclusion - but that is a violation of WP:SYN. Wikipedia cannot rely on articles of this nature that basically say "This...
Click to read more »his regular ISP - and has been editing with a similar theme for a few days now.. --Versageek 02:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Syn 02:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »filtered ftp no-response 22/tcp filtered ssh no-response 80/tcp open http syn-ack ttl 51 |_http-title: ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Delete Agree with nom, it is a coatrack article filled with WP:SYN. LK (talk) 04:25, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Delete CRETOG8(t/c) 04:55, 1 June 2012...
Click to read more »result was delete. Discussion below indicates that the article violates WP:SYN and WP:NPOV. --jonny-mt 14:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Timeline of the future...
Click to read more »not all, of the comparisons made, then the other comparisons should be tagged with {{syn}}, and if not provided then the comparisons should be removed....
Click to read more »delete. MBisanz talk 01:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Part of a walled garden of SYN/OR by Jagged 85 (talk · contribs). See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inventions...
Click to read more »page. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Delete. OR and novel syn lead to a very misleading article. --Procutus (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2008...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Essay, pure WP:OR and WP:SYN violations. RGTraynor 19:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. Ioeth...
Click to read more »so you edit the policy or guideline. ...you point out that WP:OR and WP:SYN actually point to the same policy. ...you mention in your unblock request...
Click to read more »frequency 21:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC) Comment - It doesn't have to be OR and SYN. There is one or two ways to avoid it: Only list those conflicts that has...
Click to read more »notability to sustain an article, seems to be heavily based on WP:OR/WP:SYN and non-reliable sources. Orderinchaos 17:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »(11) to Cardinal Syn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.mobylgames.com/game/cardinal-syn-cardinal-syn (R/Xmeta/L- removed)...
Click to read more »Talk/Contribs 22:45, 15 February 2010 (UTC) Delete This sure feels like wp:or or wp:syn. I see this: $25M grant to MSU for bio-digital evolution center, AP but not...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Entire essay is an original research and WP:SYN violation. None of the sources actually reference the word justifiable insurrection...
Click to read more »views on patents contains a great deal of content that violates WP:OR and WP:SYN. What remains overlaps with content in the Patent article. Article has very...
Click to read more »amount of effort has gone into this article but it is a case of WP:OR / WP:SYN. I would support a new article that chronicled "the most notable lists" of...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC) Delete, appears to be an essay. WP:SYN applies. Nothing to merge anywhere. --Kinu t/c 08:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »g b ) Langsdorffia hypogea - ( wp g b ) Larix x eurolepis - ( wp g b ) - syn. Larix eurolepis Lecythis idation - ( wp g b ) Lecythis usitata - ( wp g...
Click to read more »mainstream research would raise serious WP:WEIGHT problems. See also Syn tag, SYN and implicit conclusions, and Proposed wording for NOR/N. Eubulides (talk)...
Click to read more »last five years. Thenightaway (talk) 00:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC) Delete. WP:SYN concerns here - a grab bag of different uses can't be cobbled together into...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedied by Graeme Bartlett. Syn 13:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Palm ZEN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »Wartenberg 01:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions Clerk note: Closing per above. — Jake Wartenberg 00:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Syn 01:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of its own. Deleting an article for WP:SYN reminds me of cutting off head to get rid of pimple on face, as WP:SYN can only occur with WP:RS. —Preceding...
Click to read more »touch on. Thenightaway (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC) Delete - WP:SYN and few/no sources treating this as a notable/cohesive concept. Neutralitytalk...
Click to read more »December 2008 (UTC) No. This nomination is explicitly on the grounds of WP:SYN – both written out in the nomination and wikilinked, so there's no possible...
Click to read more »Delete, an interesting essay, but Wikipedia is not the place for this per WP:SYN. jorgenev 08:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC) The first part could be covered in Pachuco...
Click to read more »checkuser comments Confirmed. I already nailed 'em before I saw this. --jpgordon::==( o ) 21:09, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions Syn 01:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(View log) Fails WP:SOURCES, has no real-world context and fails WP:OR / WP:SYN -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 15:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »more than original research with one citation to Youtube and another a WP:SYN cite that doesn't mention the topic. Serendipodous 20:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article, in that being unreferenced, it can only be regarded as WP:OR/WP:SYN, and it reads like a WP:SOAPBOX (former oppressor? All of the Ukrainian political...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) This article constitutes an WP:OR and WP:SYN. There are no scholarly researches covering this subject in general, the...
Click to read more »idea that comparing lap times from different sources is a violation of WP:SYN so they created their own identical version without the caveat that the road...
Click to read more »original nomination and per SteveBaker above) and removing all WP:OR and WP:SYN, but I'm afraid it will become blank as a result of such cleaning up; I agree...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Most "keep" opinions do not address the WP:SYN problems of this article, and cannot therefore be taken into account when...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This appears to be WP:SYN. It is basically the work of one user, who has written several closely-related...
Click to read more »The Hindu adding criticism section using non-RS, blogs and insertion of WP:SYN [1], [2]. Both of them called me "lackey of The Hindu Group" in this edit...
Click to read more »incomplete listing. Filing for them, to complete it. No opinion on article. Syn 13:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC) The nomination was made by an unregistered user...
Click to read more »isn't even listed it just comes up in the search for approx. two books. Syn 07:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC) Please look carefully, both the books have his...
Click to read more »Russavia to cite WP:SYN as a better reasoning to assert WP:OR, but even if he does, there is far less grounds for claims of WP:SYN when it comes to relatively...
Click to read more »Tanacetum coccineum (Willd.) Grierson [syn.: Chrysanthemum Marschallii Aschers] Tanacetum coccineum (Willd.) Grierson [syn.: Chrysanthemum roseum Web. & Mohr...
Click to read more »unencyclopedic, unreferenced and in my opinion an apparent WP:NOR or WP:SYN violation. In my opinion also reads as a fan page. Hell In A Bucket (talk)...
Click to read more »"liberal arts" sounds similar is mostly a coincidence). In short, WP:MADEUP WP:SYN/WP:OR thing. The topic at hand can be covered just as well in articles like...
Click to read more »by the existing article Translational medicine--which has its own OR and SYN and NPOV & promotional problems, but includes everything from here that might...
Click to read more »significant anti-capitalism elements. Given that, what are the Blatant OR and SYN parts of this article? The major anti-capitalism sources cited address all...
Click to read more »reviewing all the comments, the consensus indicates the POV-fork nature and SYN of the articles prevents their inclusion and that therefore they should be...
Click to read more »contents. It is unsourced, which raises issues about WP:OR and especially WP:SYN, not to mention WP:NPOV. The page makes no sense. The "modern empires" are...
Click to read more »counterterrorism scholarship. The page is a barely readable hodge-podge of WP:SYN violations, bringing a number of organizations together under the umbrella...
Click to read more »of articles published in low-quality journals like this; the rest is WP:SYN/padding. This page is an effort to promote a psych treatment using WP. NOTYET...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article had a loooong WP:SYN section on secretin for autism (spoiler: it doesn't work, but the section...
Click to read more »with this article, including the violations of WP:OR and specifically WP:SYN. The individual statements are correct, no doubt, but they are tied together...
Click to read more »blocked the sock and gave DLA9999 a warning about sockpuppetry. Icestorm815 • Talk 18:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions Syn 18:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »synthetic essay. Aleta Sing 15:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - OR, POV, WP:SYN; the list just rolls on. Merenta (talk) 02:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »potentially WP:POV. Happyme22 (talk) 08:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Delete as WP:SYN per nom. Among the sources, none are dedicated to addressing this topic directly...
Click to read more »Decision on Pseudoscience. Michaelbusch 17:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) delete An WP:SYN collection of various ideas that are like this author's idea of "Thoughtform...
Click to read more »31 October 2007 (UTC) Ridernyc 21:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:SYN and WP:NOT. This is, indeed, getting rather silly. Stifle (talk) 22:55, 31...
Click to read more »Delete I sincerely despair at how we are going to get WP:NOR, especially WP:SYN, into their heads... the key part of this article - "How it distinguishes...
Click to read more »Bufotes balearicus per our early analysis and the confusion is due to a syn. Bufo viridis balearicus [1]. It may be nice to ask for an expert opinion...
Click to read more »The CMD's Most Wanted - WP:NOT#SOAPBOX, WP:NOT#MYSPACE User:WIKISCRIPPS 07/SYN Groups - An extremely detailed listing of Yahoo groups maintained by the...
Click to read more »advance the position that it is a notable phenomena is original research WP:SYN. Habanero-tan (talk) 11:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Comment Is there an article...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) Delete, appears to be an essay which violates WP:NOR and WP:SYN. --Kinu t/c 03:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Delete as Wikipedia is not a soapbox...
Click to read more »This article besides being a case of pov and wp:soap, is also a case of wp:syn. Jayran 03:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC) If the only problem is the quote with...
Click to read more »tonight. — MaggotSyn 16:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC) I doubt there is enough to establish notability. So delete I suppose, for now. — MaggotSyn 03:57, 11 June...
Click to read more »trivial intersection of arbitrary categories with irresolvable problems of WP:SYN and WP:NPOV. Guy (Help!) 13:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Keep: There also...
Click to read more »mention the article subject. This is fine as long as it is consistent with WP:SYN and it does not imply a substantial new conclusion that is not present in...
Click to read more »is purely original research via synthesis. Fails WP:V, WP:N, WP:NOR, WP:SYN. Chardish 02:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Redirect to Super Mario Galaxy: Per...
Click to read more »the cost and being limited to syn adducts Un-parallel. Reworded. Dr Zak 15:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC) stereoarrays: syn selective: [30] and anti selective:...
Click to read more »Scientology book on Google Books. As for your WP:SYN comment, I'm afraid you're misunderstanding what WP:SYN actually says. It prohibits us from "putting...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to be a low quality POV piece, containing WP:SYN synthesis. This topic and its subtopics have much higher quality coverage...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This appears to be WP:SYN. It is basically the work of one user, who has written several closely-related...
Click to read more »(per arguments given here. Dahn 14:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Delete all per WP:SYN. KissL 14:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Keep The phenomenon exists and discussed...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete, per WP:SYN and WP:NOT#INFO. Sean William @ 16:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...
Click to read more »24 February 2008 (UTC) Remote Neural Monitoring - (4956) - Delete, see WP:SYN - archived 10:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Brownfield architecture - (7725)...
Click to read more »an article amounting to an attack page for purposes of WP:CSD 10 (or a WP:SYN violation). Such constructions are not necessarily so, however; for example...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Merge and redirect. Syn.Maggot says he did the merge. I'll redirect the title and keep the history...
Click to read more »16:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Strong delete: Per nom, it is WP:SOAP full of WP:SYN. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Keep - While the...
Click to read more »schoolwork. Mandsford (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Delete - per WP:OR and WP:SYN. Tnxman307 (talk) 15:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »know its a hoax). — MaggotSyn 04:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Update: tagged as G4. One more time and I'm filing a salt. — MaggotSyn 04:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »original synthesis of ideas, which is clearly forbidden by WP:OR and WP:SYN. Quoting the OR policy: Interpretations and syntheses must be attributed...
Click to read more »June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions User warned. Block isn't necessary; closing case. — Jake Wartenberg 18:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC) Syn 00:42, 18 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »half the !votes are for delete, parts of the article seem to violate WP:SYN, and the "popular culture" section mixes past and future indiscriminately...
Click to read more »by the existing article Translational research--which has its own OR and SYN and NPOV & promotional problems, but includes everything from here that might...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:OR, WP:SYN; I don't see anything here that indicates that comparison of Indian online...
Click to read more »Using a simple fact tag also quickly gets rid of OR and SYN problems. More fundamentally, SYN and OR are not acceptable reasons to delete an article....
Click to read more »Magoo (talk) 04:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC) Delete - this seems to refer to a SYN flood (which is notable), but with no sources at all attesting the usage...
Click to read more »10 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - Redundant, and a borderline violation of WP:SYN. —dgiestc 05:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Thewinchester (talk)...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:Syn seems to apply here. Suggestion of merging into Terrorism seems well supported...
Click to read more »there is a link to the declaration of human rights, but that by itself is WP:SYN and WP:OR. Reads like an essay. No independent coverage. Brusegadi 23:10...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESSAY and possibly WP:SYN. --Kinu t/c 02:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC) Delete as it is too much like an essay...
Click to read more »more looks at the article and other people's comments, this is definately SYN and OR, and should be deleted. Angryapathy (talk) 14:50, 18 November 2009...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep Sorting numbers in descending order is not original research. WP:SYN requires some new conclusion be drawn like saying that there are too many...
Click to read more »entirely appropriate for a userpage (see here for more information). — MaggotSyn 16:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Still, a sandbox is more appropriate.--LAAFan 16:41...
Click to read more »of the words. Agricolae (talk) 00:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC) Delete: per WP:SYN --Reference Desker (talk) 04:55, 30 April 2011 (UTC) Delete: per all above...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:OR, WP:SYN. The term "libre services" is a neologism with no notable adoption; references...
Click to read more »multiple Wikipedia policies, including but not limited to WP:BLP, WP:NOR, WP:SYN and WP:V. FCYTravis 05:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Taliban Supporters (edit |...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Violates WP:OR, WP:SYN. roux 17:24, 11 December 2008 (UTC) Delete, no sources or anything given...
Click to read more »(View log) Appears to be a personal essay. Interesting, but fails WP:OR & WP:SYN. I don't think it's salvageable, as there's very little linkage between the...
Click to read more »One of Diastereomer#Syn_/_anti or Descriptor_(chemistry)#syn,_anti would seem to be a more accurate target. After this RfD, syn isomer should probably...
Click to read more »only 04:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC) Delete completely untrue; WP:OR; WP:SYN. Doesn't even qualify as a dictionary definition as it is not a gesture and...
Click to read more »garnered quite some media attention over the years, but it takes a lot of WP:SYN to construct a biography from that. No secondary sources found that cover...
Click to read more »from the Maui News. Flunks WP:BIO and WP:NOT#NEWS. Article is full of WP:SYN, and puffed by a poster that has nothing to do with Burke. Salting of the...
Click to read more »Rose is syn. of Senna durangensis, "C. durangensis" of other authors is Senna pilosior Cassia leptocarpa (wd | gwp gwe g | in it p powo) - syn. of Senna...
Click to read more »tagged. If I'm not around, please close this case when the bot is back up. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Syn 19:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »redirect to RfD and two templates to TfD following this transclusion. — MaggotSyn 12:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Comment. I'd also like to nominate Template:User...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Whole article is WP:SYN. Steve (talk) 20:46, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Delete and redirect, per nomination...
Click to read more »of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. http://syn.org.au/get-cereal-mondays-season-3/ http://syn.org.au/review-groovin-moo-2017/ Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »WP:ONEEVENT; no independent notability. Appears to be largely WP:OR and WP:SYN. Possible merge with Bantam (military), if there's independently useful content...
Click to read more »19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom and the subject wants it that way. Syn 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately...
Click to read more »and the topic is notable, this article is an unholy mix of WP:HOWTO, WP:SYN and advertorial. It's been flagged as needing a complete rewrite for over...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) blatant WP:OR/WP:SYN, inherent lack of WP:RS, failed WP:GNG. The whole article is based on two...
Click to read more »It is to be left open until then, with no further comments. Thank you. Syn 01:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Clerk note: Please see this for ArbCom's decision...
Click to read more »origin reflects nationality) is irrelevent and unsourced original research WP:SYN and needs to be removed. -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is page is essentially WP:SYN and promoting the work of one lab -- a mini-review assembling primary sources...
Click to read more »21:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Delete - not a hoax. The unreliable sources and SYN/OR violations has to go. QuackGuru (talk) 21:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »is appropriate, no? — MaggotSyn 04:27, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Struck out because I now understand what you mean. :) — MaggotSyn 04:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »neither a disambiguation page nor a proper article. To me, it looks like a WP:SYN to create an impression of a continuing, hundred-year long war (compare {{Campaignbox...
Click to read more »that the accounts are related. — Jake Wartenberg 16:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Clerk note: All blocked, no tagging. Syn 21:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Conclusions...
Click to read more »Thump25 (talk · contribs)) No sources other than self-promoting ones, WP:SYN ideas about why it's such a hotbed of accomplished and good-looking talent...
Click to read more »assuredly a POV essay on the subject, has some sources but amount to WP:SYN and thus original research. Arkyan • (talk) 15:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(View log) Tagged since October 2008 for multiple issues, fails WP:OR and WP:SYN. Adamantios (talk) 10:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Strong Keep as primary sources...
Click to read more »article needs to be rewritten from scratch anyway to address WP:SPS and WP:SYN, so absent a complete rewrite WP:TNT seems appropriate. 59.149.124.29 (talk)...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC) I agree with the nomination that WP:SYN appears to be a problem with this article, but I'm not sure that deletion...
Click to read more »Delete as nom 5-sentence article completely about unverifiable longevity OR/SYN. Sources are unreliable GRG (2) and OHB, and one unlinked Guardian article...
Click to read more »"coverup"/"pattern of activity" would appear to be a violation of WP:OR / WP:SYN. The use of "scandal" in the title also seems problematic with WP:NPOV, although...
Click to read more »article. Mandsford (talk) 01:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC) Delete: Article is WP:SYN. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »CD and I'm sure there is a history here that might only be in dead trees. Syn 22:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list...
Click to read more »nominating related To W.H., where the references are just about entirely WP:SYN. THF (talk) 13:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »describe individual parts of the puzzle and then assembling them via WP:SYN. The Anome (talk) 07:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Keep - that the article's...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Borderline WP:SYN. Should probably be merged with, and/or redirect to, Beliefs and practices...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Keep as withdrawn. — MaggotSyn 06:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Political...
Click to read more »cited. Fixer1234 02:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC) Comment - Yeah, WP:NOR and WP:SYN do not seem to be problems.Brusegadi 02:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »of WP:SYN on the side. Horologium talk - contrib 03:37, 19 May 2007 (UTC) Comment: Which parts are WP:NPOV and WP:OR with a huge serving of WP:SYN on the...
Click to read more »to address POV (turning the article from my original WP:POV essay into WP:SYN). A clear and consistent definition is lacking, though I didn't fully realise...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. OR and in particular a SYN violation. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 21:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC) Delete SYN violation. Spatulli (talk) 22:28,...
Click to read more »seems to be the best option. Doge120 12:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:SYN. Not encyclopedic. It might be possible to clean up the POV and send parts...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A personal essay with non-trivial WP:SYN. Guy (Help!) 08:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Tal Brenev (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev Delete. Original SYN. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC). Delete per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) It also may be possible that some people are unaware of the WP:SYN portion of WP:NOR. The OR is a question of synthesis. Even if every single...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This academic essay clearly violates WP:SYN. It does not merely describe Stanley Deetz' theory, (but offers an evaluation...
Click to read more »"sophophilia" (as "sopho-" is the combining form), but that doesn't exist either.WP:SYN for the personal reflection on philosophy. After I proposed deletion for...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Dustitalk to me 16:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:SYN, WP:V and WP:N. AnteaterZot (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Strong Delete...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff - DELETED) - Link: www.printernational.co.uk/syn_leather.htm (R/Xmeta/L) Displayed all 1 additions....
Click to read more »com/ss/customer-reviews/0709167482/ref=cm_cr_dp_syn_footer?_encoding=UTF8&k=Pimpernel%20Gold&ref_=cm_cr_dp_syn_footer&showViewpoints=1 ? http://www.amazon...
Click to read more »hockey teams itself. I doubt the article can be ever expanded without WP:SYN or something like that. Blacklake (talk) 14:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »Original research mhking (talk) 21:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Delete, going on WP:SYN. We aren't a repository for essays such as this. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr...
Click to read more »article was massively padded with a) general content about phobias; 2) OR/SYN; 3) content based on sources that were about anxiety not phobia, some of...
Click to read more »Blatant copyright infringement: of http://www.beatificvisionthemovie.com/syn.html) — Becksguy (talk) 05:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Beatific Vision (2008...
Click to read more »cited sources are unverifiable; article appears to be in whole or part WP:SYN; content of article is non-notable per WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:09...
Click to read more »Helosia brasiliensis - ( wp g b ) - spelling error Helosis brasiliensis is a syn of Helosis cayennensis var. cayennensis Herreria salsaparrilha - ( wp g b...
Click to read more »draw more attention to the articles so they can be improved? :) — MaggotSyn 02:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Keep per Gazimoff. Re-nominate it if and when it...
Click to read more »delete--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Delete, a distinct whiff of WP:SYN and WP:COI. Guy (Help!) 15:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Delete. There is already...
Click to read more »and that confirms a show called chimcam will be aired. Appears to by WP:SYN, and Non notable. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Oppose...
Click to read more »subject, but absolutely nothing here qualifies as such. Issues of OR and SYN, but mainly just a confused mess of random vaguely relevant statements. Redirected...
Click to read more »Delete, WP:OR, Essay, POV, etc. Since I believe that all good WP articles are SYN I shan't specially accuse it of that, though it certainly is. Totally unencyclopedic...
Click to read more »describe a solution. --Dhartung | Talk 21:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:SYN. Stifle (talk) 14:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »High School websites than here. Also, this topic is very close to being WP:SYN (synthesis). Steve Quinn (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »criticism of the individual claims (which is mostly true already), while the WP:SYN would be eliminated by the non-RS conspiracy theorists. If it was stated...
Click to read more »essay. A probable assertion but still in clear violation of WP:V and WP:SYN. NeoFreak 21:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Delete. OR. Who the heck is "Police...
Click to read more »Anville 15:14, 14 November 2005 (UTC) Delete per nom and Anville... DoG as syn for OR... heh. KillerChihuahua 15:30, 14 November 2005 (UTC) Delete OR. Edwardian...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is blatant WP:SYN. The term "Bernoulli space" is rarely used - Google finds only a hundred...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:Or and WP:SYN. No theory of such name seems to exist (see also here), the article is rather...
Click to read more »Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:V and WP:SYN. No redirect necessary - there is no way "possible crisis in western publishing"...
Click to read more »definition of original research. Ravenswing 18:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC) See WP:SYN. Unfortunately, based on my experience, this policy is not always enforced...
Click to read more »deleted content was not an exact copy. No comment on this article just yet. Syn 23:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Delete as a neologism and dictionary definition...
Click to read more »given apparently disparate datasets. Whether or not having it violates WP:SYN et al. The second issue needs to be resolved before it's even worth considering...
Click to read more »ports (no-response) PORT STATE SERVICE REASON VERSION 1001/tcp open rtsp syn-ack ttl 53 |_rtsp-methods: ERROR: Script execution failed (use -d to debug)...
Click to read more »article and that no article could be written without violating WP:OR and WP:SYN. (This survived a deletion attempt in 2005, which can be found on talk, but...
Click to read more »February 2010 (UTC) Weak keep and scrub. Article is full of WP:PUFF and WP:SYN, and needs a lot of clean-up, but appears to be notable and easily sourced...
Click to read more »real, but the lineage to Sigurd Ring is either original research, or WP:SYN, or from an outdated book. The other thing is that no academic historian...
Click to read more »"grotesque" WP:SYN article at Putinism basically is - and I say grotesque because the editor [who is currently blocked] who added most of the SYN himself said...
Click to read more »your best bet is to just report the IPs to WP:AIV in the future. Icestorm815 • Talk 16:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions Syn 00:32, 18 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »June 9 X polysomy Ecoregions Main Battle Tank Cardiac arrests Is syn-Propanethial-S-oxide stable enough for it to be stored for some time at room...
Click to read more »page, as per Xxanthippe. Content has issues with WP:UNDUE, WP:OR, and WP:SYN, but contains some material that would be worth merging into the parent article...
Click to read more »(View log) Well-written essay, but that's what it is; it fails WP:NOR and WP:SYN as being original research, something the creator himself admits on the article's...
Click to read more »Gonzonoir (talk) 10:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Delete as OR and SYN, and not very accurate SYN at that, written because nobody would accept this nonsense in...
Click to read more »author objected. Toddst1 (talk) 08:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Delete. per WP:SYN. Daa89563 (talk) 10:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Delete per Daa89563. There...
Click to read more »several language articles recently created by Nanshu that is a violation of WP:SYN and includes information that contradicts other articles on Wikipedia and...
Click to read more »Speakers and roundtable discussions I would like to have a discussion about WP:SYN and WP:V; additional details can be found on this user subpage. --RoyGoldsmith...
Click to read more »is this a synthesis of? --T-rex 02:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC) A reading of WP:SYN might help clarify the question here. B.Wind (talk) 04:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:SYN. A Parliamentary system does not automatically establish the official existence...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:POVFORK, personal essay, WP:SYN from the title on down. Guy (Help!) 10:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 13:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Makers and Takers (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »is most probably WP:SYN. It was recently reduced to an empty shell, due to removal of material considered against policies of WP:SYN, WP:NOR and WP:POV...
Click to read more »Delete While interesting, and probably important, this seems more like WP:SYN and WP:OR. The Occupy movement already has plenty of articles here, as does...
Click to read more »means that the record should now be complete", which is a violation of WP:SYN. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 05:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC) Delete. OR and O SYN. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC). Delete For obvious reasons...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Incoherent article; WP:SYN; WP:NEOLOGISM Curb Chain (talk) 07:08, 11 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »content based on them is strung together to make an argument. In WP this is WP:SYN. The original article appeared to me to be an effort to use WP to publicize...
Click to read more »a list is not a violation of WP:SYN. Or you would consider a list like the one in Vampire films a violation of WP:SYN only because there's no reputable...
Click to read more »HowardBGolden (talk) 16:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Delete Textbook case of WP:SYN. Sailsbystars (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Also, the first time...
Click to read more »commented here. --Krelnik (talk) 17:50, 24 July 2015 (UTC) Delete as WP:SYN and complete bollocks. Guy (Help!) 21:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC) Delete. I'm...
Click to read more »this page. The result was No consensus which defaults to keep. — MaggotSyn 00:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Reports...
Click to read more »edit wars through the posting of material in clear violation of WP:OR, WP:SYN, and WP:NPOV, adamantly refusing in every case any consensual re-working...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 16:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Improvision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Keep as withdrawn. — MaggotSyn 11:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Nikolai Markovitch (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »Delete, WP:NOT a free webhost. Nakon 03:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:SYN and WP:OR X Marx The Spot (talk) 03:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Delete another...
Click to read more »2004-12-03. Wales, Jimmy. "Original research", 2004-12-06. Kock, N., Jung, Y., & Syn, T. (2016). Wikipedia and e-Collaboration Research: Opportunities and Challenges...
Click to read more »Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrior777 (talk • contribs) Delete per WP:SYN. --JN466 15:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC) Mixed - This could be a good article...
Click to read more »As criteria for celebrity is indeed arbitrary, this list becomes WP:OR/WP:SYN (subjective debatable criteria is WP:OR, as I can choose different criteria...
Click to read more »of state assembly bill and actual signage Is there a word for people who syn flood IRL Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2013 October 31...
Click to read more »one or two lines could be merged but this looks like very obvious WP:OR#SYN Eleland 14:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Redirect to Angst, as that's what I believe...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 13:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Robert Parry (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »cover, inferring such things on Wikipedia often runs afoul of WP:OR and WP:SYN. The reader doesn't really need to see this particular book cover to understand...
Click to read more »encyclopedic. Carlossuarez46 19:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC) Delete, mostly per WP:SYN. The subject is somewhat arbitrary and thus unencyclopedic: "hanging in NDH"...
Click to read more »comparisons regarding subjects which others have only looked individually has WP:SYN issues. This article attempts a comparative look at how religions view creation...
Click to read more »04:01, 15 April 2017 (UTC) delete -there is pure WP:OR here as well as WP:SYN - the real topic of this article essay appears to be "Why coal mining is...
Click to read more »page is redundant to WP:STUB and Category:Stub categories. Delete. — MaggotSyn 10:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Weakish delete per nom. An example might well be...
Click to read more »11:35:15 AM] Filll says: syn are you there? [4/20/2008 11:35:18 AM] Filll says: can yo type? [4/20/2008 11:35:26 AM] Kim Bruning says: syn helo! [4/20/2008 11:35:33...
Click to read more »TheGracefulSlick (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Delete. Looks like WP:SYN. This is not a commonly accepted classification of anything, and not a useful...
Click to read more »Co-nomination by weburiedoursecretsinthegarden SynergeticMaggot (let's call him Syn, ok?) is an incredibly established editor here of the English Wikipedia....
Click to read more »this page must go. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:18, 19 June 2012 (UTC) Delete WP:SYN poster child. --BDD (talk) 20:29, 19 June 2012 (UTC) Delete - fails the rules...
Click to read more »support from the critical literature. As it stands, a mix of WP:OR and WP:SYN.KD Tries Again (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)KD Tries Again Comment...
Click to read more »somehow relate to the article text, but if they do, it is still obviously WP:SYN. It would require a total and complete rewrite of this article for it to...
Click to read more »and weasel word assertions in itself (the definition appears to be a WP:SYN paraphrase, phrases such as "an area of constant change", "digital... performance...
Click to read more »doesn't meet GNG either. —МандичкаYO 😜 15:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:SYN of material which is not directly about the subject.--Antigng (talk) 10:36...
Click to read more »(Talk) 03:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:SYN. Of note, notability does not have to do with "what one person finds interesting...
Click to read more »edu/areas/reich/syntheses/Strychnine-Woodward-syn.htm, http://www.chem.wisc.edu/areas/reich/syntheses/Strychnine-Overman-syn.htm, http://www.chem.wisc...
Click to read more »--Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:36, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Delete - same OR/SYN problems as the other articles in this series. LadyofShalott 04:57, 5 September...
Click to read more »this page. The result of the debate was Speedied by Gwen Gale as G7 — MaggotSyn 23:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC) I created this page and have little motivation...
Click to read more »Kock but prior to the paper in which the term was coined, which would be WP:SYN). The vast majority of the substantive content is drawn directly from Kock's...
Click to read more »WordNet (r) 2.0 : conversion n 1: an event that results in a transformation [syn: transition, changeover] ... 9: the act of changing from one use or function...
Click to read more »justifiedGnevin (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:NOR, WP:SYN and WP:NOT. That the article may be getting "too big" is an aesthetic consideration...
Click to read more »Clasping bellflower = Clasping bell-flower - Triodanis perfoliata - ( wp g b ) syn. Specularia perfoliata and Legouzia perfoliata Cod-head - ( wp g b ) Common...
Click to read more »individual sources on the subject. That's not what we mean by WP:SYN -- the prohibited WP:SYN is our drawing factual conclusions where the authors of the works...
Click to read more »Delete since it's an essay. It's underreferenced and contaons some OR and SYN. Majoreditor (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Delete, original research...
Click to read more »Auto-generated every hour. Editor interaction utility All are interested in adding SYN (#1 in X countries, worldwide hit, etc.) to a limited number of songs (and...
Click to read more »some random preferences for candidates. The article almost feels like WP:SYN in that some of these things have come up in biographies but haven't been...
Click to read more »Plead Your Case 20:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Clerk note: Block was extended. Syn 20:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself...
Click to read more »proper timeline would be acceptable, but this fails WP:NPOV, WP:FRINGE and WP:SYN. Guy (Help!) 22:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »for deletion at approximately one year after activity has stopped. — MaggotSyn 23:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC) ahh he has been around for nearly 4 years, he ain't...
Click to read more »also. -- Luke (Talk) 16:47, 26 November 2011 (UTC) Delete, obvious WP:OR/WP:SYN, wholly unnecessary POV fork of John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 05:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC) Kepahiang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »composite resonator, Quantum Gravitational Resonator are pure WP:OR and WP:SYN; they don't exist outside of wikipedia (plus maybe fringe sources). The article...
Click to read more »unsourced, there is nothing suitable to be merged. It violates WP:OR, WP:SYN, WP:V and probably WP:COATRACK and WP:LISTCRUFT, as well. To demonstrate...
Click to read more »ahead. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC) Delete as WP:OR and WP:SYN. --BDD (talk) 23:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC) Delete as OR and OSYN. Xxanthippe...
Click to read more »articles in the future. Dahn 14:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Delete all per WP:SYN. KissL 14:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Strong keep - well-sourced description of...
Click to read more »the original issue and is trying to divert it by claiming WP:Fringe and WP:SYN. user:SpacemanSpiff ignores my explanations to these and continues to argue...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Keep per the consensus and snow. — MaggotSyn 12:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Ultimate...
Click to read more »and RS shortcuts redirected to the reliable sources section of ATT; and WP:SYN redirected to the synthesis section of ATT. This enabled editors to continue...
Click to read more »no sources specifically covering this topic. It is ether OR:FORK or OR:SYN. Largely unsourced. Wikidas© Delete or merge remaining sourced material (not...
Click to read more »but mostly we are looking at a big WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NPOV, WP:OR and WP:SYN violation. AlexTiefling (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Addendum - It transpires...
Click to read more »– Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Syn 21:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Keep per partial withdraw and rewrite. — MaggotSyn 09:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Headlong (Ings novel) (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »(per arguments given here. Dahn 14:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Delete all per WP:SYN. KissL 14:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Keep The phenomenon exists and discussed...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 00:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Heresiarch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »the attribution to Titian. The article in fact looks like a synthesis WP:SYN to prove "a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources", that...
Click to read more »vs. Kong that was reverted due to being unsourced and in violation of WP:SYN and WP:FAN [1]. It is not Lance Reddick's final film. Godzilla vs. Kong was...
Click to read more »and understand its significance is sort of an image-type of WP:OR and WP:SYN. This might be fine for a freely-licensed/PD image or even per fair use,...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 11:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Suzan Sabancı Dinçer (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »apologist), opinion piece, in contravention of WP:OR, WP:POV, WP:BLP and WP:SYN amongst others. Clearly, if retained, a more balanced piece is needed. However...
Click to read more »about supposed European influences on necoconservatism, and violates OR, SYN. We would need to show that there is a body of literature about this subject...
Click to read more »able to read the sources, one has to come with specific pointers for the SYN accusation. Quotes from sources seem to agree with the article. DeVerm (talk)...
Click to read more »userboxes created by this user is: User:The Ministry of Truth/Userboxes/Anarcho Syn User:The Ministry of Truth/Userboxes/Bad Faith User:The Ministry of...
Click to read more »have a lot of OR Delete it certainly seems like original research or WP:SYN. The quote is verifiable. The information about slavery is verifiable. but...
Click to read more »from providing no more information than the main article, it contains WP:SYN. For instance the North Korea part. No military operations were ever conducted...
Click to read more »lifestyle bullshit thing. However, I have also removed great globs of WP:SYN from the article and most of the references there still don't actually talk...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 13:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC) Pulverised fuel firing (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »see a possible violation of Wikipedia:No original research, perhaps in WP:SYN. Shalom Hello 16:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC) Delete I don't know how possible...
Click to read more »edit Articles edit Images Image:SYN LOGO1.jpg (history · last edit) from [1]. Nomination completed by DumbBOT 12:41, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Image:Ashley...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff - DELETED) - Link: www.printernational.co.uk/syn_leather.htm (R/Xmeta/L) Displayed 1 additions out of 1 total. For more info...
Click to read more »journalist and writer Truten Zhivopisets Polar Star (Decembrist journal) Syn otechestva Mikhail Katkov Russkoye Bogatstvo Russkaya Starina Voskhod (magazine)...
Click to read more »relying on WP:RS which presents the entire history is verging on WP:NOR and WP:SYN since there are hundreds of events that could be included in the "timeline"...
Click to read more »Africa group. That is what WP policy tells us." – Shamir is suggesting WP:SYN says this Oct 15: "All that is being done is reflecting the position of the...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Article is full of WP:OR and WP:SYN. I see no way to fix the article to avoid that, so I have to conclude that...
Click to read more »page. The result was Speedy keep per snow and quick consensus. — MaggotSyn 11:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Roller Coaster (video game) (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 05:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Pure...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced WP:SYN by sock of prolific sockpuppeteer user:Lawmander, whose MO is idiosyncratic...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violates WP:NPOV/WP:BIAS and WP:SYN. Anglophone users may be very prevalent on the internet, but it isn't inherently...
Click to read more »Comment - Did you see that there is already an ongoing discussion about WP:SYN? Could you please address these concerns in detail. ...It looks to me like...
Click to read more »edit Images Image:SYN LOGO1.jpg (history · last edit) from [1]. Nomination completed by DumbBOT 12:41, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Image:Ashley Tesoro ep.jpg...
Click to read more »properly support the term. I have to conclude this is a neologism or WP:SYN. Guy (Help!) 13:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »information. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:SYN. Not denying that it's useful information, but this is the wrong place for...
Click to read more »Requested by – Syn 00:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Clerk note: RFCU added based on PMDrives comment below. No comment on case. Recused. Syn 00:19, 15 July 2009...
Click to read more »tribunal. The connection of the tribunal with the project it ruled on is SYN in and of itself. Collect (talk) 10:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC) Title of article...
Click to read more »this editor try this way. In addition to these points, the article is a WP:SYN at best, a quick glance at the sources reveal that they are outdated and...
Click to read more »14:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC) Delete unless sourced reliably. As is this is WP:SYN and guesswork. --Dhartung | Talk 01:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC) Keep per IAR,...
Click to read more »- Saying these concepts are related is a stretch, and a violation of WP:SYN. Until a reputable source writes an account of suicide booths throughout...
Click to read more »Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC) Delete - WP:OR / WP:SYN. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC) Delete -- Article as it...
Click to read more »on either. RGTraynor 15:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:OR and WP:SYN by a country mile. Swing Low, Sweet Chariot a British patriotic song (seemingly...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was Keep. Speedy-d is not applicable. — MaggotSyn 15:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Bearforce 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »better sourcing any article here article is going to crash badly against OR/SYN or other policies. The current state of the article, and history versions...
Click to read more »StopForumSpam) 2016-11-20 06:59:39 (UTC): w:si:User:Chan Koder (t - c; 12) to w:si:SynKoda Community (diff !top) - Link: www.synkoda.com (R/Xmeta/L- still there)...
Click to read more »13 October 2013 (UTC) Delete per violetriga. It's a dicdef by way of WP:SYN. --BDD (talk) 16:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a work of WP:SYN about which there is basically one source, available full text here, which...
Click to read more »fasciculata var. fasciculata (wd | gwp gwe g | in it p powo) {{ITIS|ID=566216}} / syn. Cassia fasciculata = sleepingplant Partridge pea (wd | gwp gwe g | in it...
Click to read more »Reply You are exactly right. If you read Wikipedia:Reliable Sources and WP:SYN you will see that application of mathematics is not a reliable source, it...
Click to read more »doesn't have a place here. Appears to be a violation of WP:NOR and or WP:SYN. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC) I am fine with deletion...
Click to read more »apartment bombings but the article creator has undone this. There is also WP:SYN/WP:OR issues here. It also needs to be mentioned that Russian apartment bombings...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 00:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Evalyn Parry (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »about the subject. It therefore appears to fail WP:V and perhaps WP:OR/WP:SYN, but perhaps others may have better luck here. Tim Song (talk) 18:00, 21...
Click to read more »edit a disparate selection of quotations, as this is clearly WP:OR and WP:SYN. The author who created this, attempted to insert this content into Falkland...
Click to read more »term of "racism." Lihaas (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Delete WP:OR/WP:SYN, plain and simple. On this basis, whether the individual organisations named...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Keep as withdrawn. — MaggotSyn 05:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Gusainji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »Falls short of anything reliable in the way of sources. Vaguely hedges on WP:SYN - but if anything it just smells a wee bit like it. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr...
Click to read more »a poorly-written article with POV issues and potential violations of WP:SYN. It may be possible to salvage with either a re-write or a combination re-write...
Click to read more »sources discussing software called "SymSyn", but that appears to be completely unrelated software–the SymSyn discussed by reliable sources is software...
Click to read more »essays/theses made by students for their doctorate degree. See for example, WP:SYN, wp:NOTHOWTO, WP:NOTESSAY Timeswantedred (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)—...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 00:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC) DJ Clay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 13:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC) Declaration of Calton Hill (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »of the latter two sources, or irrelevant. Even ignoring the COATRACK and SYN issues, this article is unsourceable. -kotra (talk) 18:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »trivia. TheLetterM (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Delete nothing but WP:SYN. -Verdatum (talk) 21:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 'delete Unless evidence of...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Delete The whole thing smacks of WP:SYN, and the topic itself is just a freak interaction between copycat crimes...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 12:58, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Maino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »WP:SOAP, WP:SYN, WP:NPOV, WP:COATRACK... the acronym list goes on and on.. ITAQALLAH 12:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:SOAP and WP:SYN. Otolemur...
Click to read more »article appears to be packed with original descriptions WP:OR and synthesis WP:SYN. Also it seems to be full of material not clearly pertaining to the topic...
Click to read more »result of the debate was Speedy closed. Mistaken venue. No worries. — MaggotSyn 11:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Only edits seem to be about how Ash and Baby V...
Click to read more »peacebuilding" article. Ovinus (talk) 21:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC) Delete - SYN, no substantial coverage. Neutralitytalk 04:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Merge...
Click to read more »pertaining to merging or redirecting can conclude on articles talk page. — MaggotSyn 11:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Sausage bun (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete searching revealed no hitsactually there are hits;WP:OR;WP:SYN;no referencesCurb Chain (talk) 11:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Speedy keep per consensus, snow and iar. — MaggotSyn 13:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC) List of Eyeshield 21 characters (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »20:19:44 (UTC): User Devongallant t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (40) to Draft:Syn Studio (edit | [[:|talk]] | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top)...
Click to read more »differences in the two parent articles. Present content wholly fails WP:SYN and WP:NOTESSAY. Someone not using his real name (talk) 02:07, 22 January...
Click to read more »16 June 2009 (UTC) Conclusions Clerk note: All accounts blocked and tagged. — Jake Wartenberg 18:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC) Syn 00:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WP:GNG; article that was moved here from draft version was huge load of WP:SYN, wrapping anybody associated with systems biology (like Leroy Hood) or personalized...
Click to read more »it deleted, and just saying delete doesn't count as an argument. — MaggotSyn 13:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC) MyHammer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »TWL) This article was mainly written by three WP:SPAs and it reads as WP:SYN, pretty blatantly so. The sources do not discuss the subject as such, and...
Click to read more »even mention fetishism. This is highly evident of WP:NOR, especially WP:SYN. Tutelary (talk) 12:39, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Keep, good deal of reference...
Click to read more »can't synthesize anything new except the arrangement as explained at WP:SYN. Msnicki (talk) 00:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Delete. We have an article on Digital...
Click to read more »consensus is established. Text supported by cites is asserted to be WP:OR and WP:SYN. I would like the discussion to consider all relevant opinions in the literature...
Click to read more »somehow relate to the article text, but if they do, it is still obviously WP:SYN. It would require a total and complete rewrite of this article for it to...
Click to read more »one on this? Borock (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Yup, textbook WP:SYN. Brings together a disparate collection of relations between cult-like groups...
Click to read more »or other sources brought in purely via WP:SYN. So fails GNG looking at MEDRS sources, and is PROMO and SYN. Jytdog (talk) 16:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Keep. Ineligible for speedy and the copyvio has been taken care of. — MaggotSyn 11:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Africa Rice Center (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more » The result was Keep. Note that WP:WAX is not a reason to keep. — MaggotSyn 07:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Madonna as gay icon (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »—Tom Morris (talk) 00:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Strong Delete Violates WP:SYN, lacks reliable sourcing. As pointed out by the nominator, what constitutes...
Click to read more »misleading, thats also WP:OR and WP:SYN. [76] I point out an edit is contrary to WP:WEIGHT, thats also WP:OR and WP:SYN. [77] I raised the matter in talk...
Click to read more »merged). Not eligible for speedy deletion, as such, discounted. — MaggotSyn 13:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Sr Rajarajeswari Peetam (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »keep. Suggest discussing the merge on the talk page, or being bold. — MaggotSyn 16:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Rod (Avenue Q) (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »are slightly too dynamic for a rangeblock, I've left them alone. Icestorm815 • Talk 19:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC) Conclusions Syn 19:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Keep as withdrawn. — MaggotSyn 09:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC) The Rape of the A*P*E* (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »don't think OR would reject that (again, I'm just spitballing on what OR and SYn say). Any naive set of operations can probably be done (see the vairous lists...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:RS and WP:SYN. WCityMike (talk) 02:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC) Delete - no notability PianoDan...
Click to read more ». Do these actually fall under this WP:SAL or is this article rather WP:SYN?174.3.125.23 (talk) 12:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »of the argument, which was not the main concern; the two concerns were WP:SYN and WP:OR. The deletes gave detailed reasons why this article failed to meet...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 09:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC) My New Haircut (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »roster even exists. Feedback 15:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC) Delete lots of WP:SYN and WP:CRYSTAL going on here. Borders on WP:HOAX as it seems a regular GFW...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 00:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC) A viuvinha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) FORK of War on Drugs, with liberal doses of WP:SYN. I would suggest merging to War on Drugs, but after the non-NPOV language...
Click to read more »note: Not actionable at this time. Please resubmit if disruption continues. — Jake Wartenberg 23:59, 20 June 2009 (UTC) Syn 01:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 00:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Strings (Unix) (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »merge, if you are still interested, on the subject and targets talk. — MaggotSyn 05:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Evidence of Inequity (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »TWL) Massively and systematically biased article. Too many issues POV,OR,SYN,NPOV, see below Soewinhan (talk) 23:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC) Strong delete...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Keep as withdrawn. — MaggotSyn 15:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Syntyche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »The article is an unsalvageable mess of POV, irrelevant information and WP:SYN from a single (blocked) user. Kolbasz (talk) 19:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Keep as withdrawn. — MaggotSyn 12:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Coconut (project) (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »My objection was RS, not SYN, although I can’t overlook what you yourself imply here -- namely that your comparison was SYN and OR of the very sort you...
Click to read more »bibliomaniac15 03:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC) I just made that same mistake. — MaggotSyn 09:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC) What ever delete it. Not too bothered in all fairness...
Click to read more »Obviously time was put into this article, but it appears to be based on WP:SYN from primary sources. Unless it can be demonstrated from third-party sources...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. Personal essay and OR/SYN. McWomble (talk) 06:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. There are a whole lot...
Click to read more »16:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC) Delete; it's just WP:OR/WP:SYN (It was a very long list of OR/SYN, and would presumably return to that state in future). Even...
Click to read more »Dowling (talk) 08:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Delete It's an essay, and all WP:SYN. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 12:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Delete Per...
Click to read more »04:08, 11 July 2008 (UTC) IronDuke 01:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:SYN violation. If this article is a response to another article, it is an example...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) Delete. Essay material and WP:OR / WP:SYN territory; needs WP:TNT. WP has individual quality articles on many of the...
Click to read more »Keep as no one other than the nominator recommends it for deletion. — MaggotSyn 10:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Creation Records discography (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »version was given in an earlier edit - [2]), nor does it make it SYN (there are SYN element in the article but not this). It just happens that "go woke...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 23:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC) Christian Jimenez (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »the sources he deleted are WP:FRINGE, or that citing such sources is WP:SYN. Csloat provided no valid arguments at the talk page to justify his actions...
Click to read more »e s e a r c h 22:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Delete, classic inherent WP:SYN. Previous articles like this one have been mercilessly deleted; see Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 09:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Kristin Rossum (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep. — MaggotSyn 00:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Yale Child Study Center (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »Kurbatov, could you please enlighten me on your terminology: what do these syn, otets, muzh, zhenikh, sledovatel etc. mean? --VLu (talk) 06:56, 20 March...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SYN, WP:PROFRINGE, lack of WP:MEDRS and (in particular) excessive reliance on...
Click to read more »nixeagle 03:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/SynBot for the original task request, just changing bots to one operated by me...
Click to read more »Xenophrenic. Syn 03:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Archiving. ~fl 11:49, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Based on Xenophrenic's edit summary I have purposely left this here. Syn 23:36...
Click to read more »material, but it's hard to rewrite parts of it without straying into WP:SYN of WP:OR territory. It's best I think to let this lapse for now unless anyone...
Click to read more »subject of therianthropy. That leaves us with a pretty clear-cut case of WP:SYN. I'm not certain that any of this info can be merged anywhere, either. Arkyan...
Click to read more »"title": "User:FleurieElizabeth" }, { "title": "User:Flood of SYNs" }, { "title": "User:Flurhs" }, { "title": "User:Funandtrvl"...
Click to read more »(anti-semetic) Not written from NPOV (and unrepairably so) Fails WP:OR and/or WP:SYN I don't think anybody would claim that the article is not well sourced, or...
Click to read more »whose subject is scientific publications by people under 20, and it fails WP:SYN as in most cases the information on the list is synthesized from separate...
Click to read more »may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,— MaggotSyn 00:08, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Delete fails WP:ATHLETE, sources are weak. Blackngold29...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Keep as withdrawn. — MaggotSyn 11:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Federer versus Nadal (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »not the page contains a snippet of writing that might be a violation of WP:SYN, that guideline, as well as the rest of WP:OR says that all material added...
Click to read more »about Pakistan and Bangladesh, seems like it violates WP:OR (specifically WP:SYN) in most cases, unless the sources actually characterize the sentiment in...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Comment from nominator: I've spent some time trying to remove WP:SYN from this article, but the more I worked on it, the more I realized that...
Click to read more »discuss all of this, it should not be in WP. That whole section is a work of SYN as well. No section should be built this way - we summarize what secondary...
Click to read more »Delete lack of secondary sources. fails WP:GNG. current article is a WP:SYN of primary sources. -Atmoz (talk) 20:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »muslims, and links a particular form of killing to them. As such, it is SYN. Per the slate article, "Is there any significance to beheading in Islam...
Click to read more »Even if we could do all those things, this article would still violate WP:SYN. Grover cleveland (talk) 21:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC) Of course at the margins...
Click to read more »by relevant literature. Árpád 14:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Delete all per WP:SYN. KissL 14:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Delete (per arguments given here. Dahn 14:45...
Click to read more »viewpoints as best I could as WP:FRINGE, and addressing issues through WP:OR, WP:SYN, WP:V and WP:RS. But as always, when an editor has a "pet" POV, compromise...
Click to read more »ceptable-criterion-delete It's an essay, nothing else to it. Violates WP:SYN, WP:V, WP:OR. Is an original idea trying to pass off as a notable topic....
Click to read more »delete OR essay. Bucketload of sources do not prevent this from bbeing WP:SYN. No WP:RS to establish WP:N Pete.Hurd 02:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Delete - OR...
Click to read more »detail how it doesn't exist (read the whole section titled Validity). — MaggotSyn 05:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC) Delete, Sourced to a fansite, which fails to meet...
Click to read more »work that is being blown up here as WP:PROMO. Most of the article is WP:SYN and WP:CRYSTALBALL. Jytdog (talk) 21:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Thanks for...
Click to read more »may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,— MaggotSyn 00:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. Blackngold29 05:22, 10 July 2008...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2010 October 6 The Further Adventures of Dr Syn - music 80s song Sting "We Work the Black Seam" Communards video jim conroy...
Click to read more »August 2010 (UTC) Delete. The very premise of the article violates both WP:SYN and WP:OR right off the bat. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is blatant WP:SYN, virtually the entire thing is primary sourced to Bible passages and the...
Click to read more »possibly do in an RfA. We're here for the candidate, not the nom. — MaggotSyn 08:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC) I wouldn't say it's "the worst thing you could...
Click to read more »consensus is emerging that this genealogical stuff is a violation of WP:SYN and nationalistacally oriented.--Aldux (talk) 20:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »was delete. Concerns about not meeting WP:GNG, and violating WP:OR and WP:SYN have not been adequately refuted. A convincing set of reliable sources on...
Click to read more »relevant arguments here are the somewhat dubious nature of the sources, and the SYN in conflating the events of the entire period. They're connected, because...
Click to read more »at best a WP:POVFORK of involuntary commitment and at worst a massive WP:SYN violation. The author was looking to get a scientology source whitelisted...
Click to read more »states "Poslední Lucemburk po meči byl zřejmě Jiří Lucemburský, nemanželský syn markraběte Prokopa, který zemřel jako benediktinský mnich v klášteře v Monte...
Click to read more »significant rewrite to comply with policy, especially WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:SYN. Even if this could be rewritten, the deletion rationale in the 2nd discussion...
Click to read more »support the statement. The only reference I can find to color in that Org. Syn. article is: "After about half the bromine has been added, the liquid assumes...
Click to read more »several Jerusalem Post articles behind subscription wall. Article has some WP:SYN problems, but that's a reason for repair, rather than deletion. THF (talk)...
Click to read more »specifically of the subject. The entire article is therefore based on WP:OR and WP:SYN. — X96lee15 (talk) 03:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Delete While being true, it really...
Click to read more »his other articles) in Italian and French. Fails WP:V, WP:N, WP:OR and WP:SYN. Ravenswing 01:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Delete Per WP:RS, WP:N, WP:V, WP:OR...
Click to read more »not be aware of the reasons by which we have articles for places. — MaggotSyn 11:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Falevai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »into articles on the economy of Tanzania, but this looks like a mix of WP:SYN and redundant content on (e.g.) Tanzania's political system. $THING in $COUNTRY...
Click to read more »euchre variations, violating WP:OR, WP:HOWTO, and, WP:NOT, and possibly WP:SYN Curb Chain (talk) 04:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC) Keep Many books about card games...
Click to read more »and WP:SOAP (and quite likely, if a closer look was given, WP:OR and WP:SYN).- Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 22:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »result of the debate was Closed. Improper forum. List article at AfD. — MaggotSyn 13:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC) userpage contains only commercial/advertising content...
Click to read more »this page. The result of the debate was Keep as already blanked. — MaggotSyn 23:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia is not a social networking site. § Lights...
Click to read more »topic this article fails our criteria for inclusion through WP:OR and WP:SYN and probably a couple of others I haven't learned yet. Jasynnash2 (talk)...
Click to read more »(wd | gwp gwe g | in it p powo) syn. Gomphrena sericantha [10] [11] Pfaffia sericea (wd | gwp gwe g | in it p powo) syn. Gomphrena sericea [12] [13] [14]...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete, seems a clear nationalistic agenda and a violation of WP:SYN.--Aldux (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Delete since subject fails WP:NWEB and WP:GNG. The poisonous aromas of WP:SYN and WP:COATRACK permeate the premises. -The Gnome (talk) 13:06, 8 July 2018...
Click to read more »"Akademiker ändrar syn på Wikipedia", Helsingborgs Dagblad (in Swedish), May 11, 2008, retrieved 2008-05-11.[dead link] "Akademiker ändrar syn på Wikipedia"...
Click to read more »they can be supported with references, but even then it still violates WP:SYN. -FrankTobia (talk) 19:56, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Comment Probably belongs in shortened...
Click to read more »