Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
are left by the readers as sources. For personal or group blogs that are not reliable sources, see § Self-published sources below. To discuss the reliability...
Click to read more »Identifying and using independent sources (also called third-party sources) helps editors build non-promotional articles that fairly portray the subject...
Click to read more »published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (). If no reliable sources can...
Click to read more »secondary sources. Law sources such as books about laws and articles about laws in magazines and academic journals may be reliable sources. Whether a...
Click to read more »WP:CTTWP:CTT This page contains the following: Issues with sources: this is for tagging issues with sources; they are either inline tags, or message boxes for...
Click to read more »also: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) Wikipedia's science articles...
Click to read more »Deprecated sources are highly questionable sources that editors are discouraged from citing in articles, because they fail the reliable sources guideline...
Click to read more »articles – is covered by the general guideline on identifying reliable sources. Ideal sources for biomedical information include: review articles (especially...
Click to read more »WP:ALBUM/SOURCEWP:ALBUM/SOURCE WP:ALBUMS/SOURCESWP:ALBUMS/SOURCES WP:ALBUM/SOURCESWP:ALBUM/SOURCES WP:ALBUMS/SOURCEWP:ALBUMS/SOURCE WP:MUSIC/SOURCEWP:MUSIC/SOURCE...
Click to read more »reliable sources, depending on the particular topic (see below: List of suggested sources). There are the general Wikipedia policies: WP:Reliable sources (WP:RS)...
Click to read more »speaking, tertiary sources (for Wikipedia purposes, as discussed at Wikipedia:No original research § Primary, secondary and tertiary sources, and Wikipedia:Identifying...
Click to read more »wiki/4paF ↓ Jump to the list of frequently discussed sources. ↓ This is a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently...
Click to read more »online versus offline sources. While many editors use online sources, such as websites and online journals, many great sources are only available offline...
Click to read more »are wrong. As long as a Wikipedia article neutrally reflects good sources, the sources cited being biased doesn't matter. Even a bad bias can be a bias...
Click to read more »reliable sources without implying any conclusions derived from improper synthesis. Invariably, articles will quite rightly draw from more than one source. So...
Click to read more »sources in context! Before posting, check the archives and list of perennial sources for prior discussions. Context is important: supply the source,...
Click to read more »generally prefers secondary sources in support of articles. It has a policy distinguishing among primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Dictionaries and glossaries...
Click to read more »them. Verifiable sources may have time restrictions (only accessible between 10am and 4pm in a particular time zone). Verifiable sources may have location...
Click to read more »specific sources at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Shortcut WP:USENETWP:USENET Posts on Usenet are rarely regarded as reliable sources, because...
Click to read more »historical article. Sources that were previously satisfactory, such as reports in the mainstream press, should be replaced by sources from historical scholarship...
Click to read more »Questionable sources are likely to be deleted because they're unlikely to be reliable. Children's sources, adult new reader sources, and abridged large-print...
Click to read more »the source of your words or ideas. In particular, sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged. If reliable sources cannot...
Click to read more »current secondary sources. At most, it tells us that editors of another work (at some probably indeterminate point) assessed different sources and came to a...
Click to read more »reaching an agreement. Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources. In brief, a primary source is one close to...
Click to read more »sources of very low reliability, due weight may be no mention at all. Sources may still have systemic bias problems. If you use only English sources,...
Click to read more »media, traditional sources can be somewhat rare. In addition, the simultaneous development and expansion of Internet-based sources alongside the modern...
Click to read more »This page links to catalogs of libraries, booksellers, and other book sources where you will be able to search for the book by its International Standard...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources. Not suitable for BLPs. See here. Marked "generally unreliable" by WP:RSP Cites other unreliable sources. No proven oversite...
Click to read more »suggestions, and other good sources may exist, so please help to expand this list. Questionable sources or proposals for additional sources may be discussed on...
Click to read more »how you can use these sources. This page deals primarily with the last question: Identifying and correctly using primary sources. The concept of primary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Common knowledge, essay Wikipedia:Independent sources, essay Wikipedia:Verifiability Wikipedia:Citing sources Wikipedia:Don't create hoaxes Wikipedia:Assume...
Click to read more »though can sometimes provide sources. In addition, the simultaneous development and expansion of Internet-based sources alongside the webcomic scene has...
Click to read more »about reliable sources for use by new page reviewers when reviewing new articles. It is intended as a supplement to the reliable sources noticeboard and...
Click to read more »An annotated list of sources for food and drink articles. The goal is to help editors find reliable sources of information on food topics. This page is...
Click to read more »does not guarantee that a source meets Wikipedia's sourcing criteria. See also Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Specialized science and technology...
Click to read more »template displays the "Uses" table cell at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. This template accepts any number of optional unnamed parameters...
Click to read more »Introduction Subject Notability Sources Content End Live Help Chat Source examples Good sources include: Books Newspapers Reputable magazines Academic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Note: You should use the shortcut {{Wikipedia:RSPSTATUS}} or full template path {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »Vaccine Safety Tips Tasks Sources Reports Perennial 805articles 5372domains 3.3%known reliable sources 0.0%flagged sources 96.7%unrated domains Reliability...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Note: You should use the shortcut {{Wikipedia:RSPLAST}} or the full template path {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »lyrics. Fair use allows us to quote short sections from copyrighted primary sources, if relevant to explaining the topic of an article. For instance, we can...
Click to read more »secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Note that it says "sources" plural. Following this guideline, a subject for which only one source can...
Click to read more »Relatively narrow scope of the source. Primary sources are not a good instrument to establish Notability or relevance. Primary sources do not typically have a...
Click to read more »right types of sources first (as explained below), and, if and only if they exist, write only what they verify, citing those sources as you write for...
Click to read more »Notability of reliable sources is the application of Wikipedia's rules on WP:Notability to the WP:Reliable sources which Wikipedia editors cite. This...
Click to read more »this Wikipedia article is to establish and consult South African Media Sources. Queries User:TapticInfo (talk) Deprecated link at archive.today (archived...
Click to read more »allow the use of some unpublished archival materials as sources. The consensus was archival sources are unpublished, so they cannot be used. See WP:PUBLISHED...
Click to read more »not acceptable as sources. These might be useful to read to find more reliable sources of information, but shouldn't be used as sources in citations. They...
Click to read more »published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources. In theory, primary sources may also be used. Reliance on primary sources can lead to...
Click to read more »sources when writing about biomedical information. Many sources that are acceptable for other types of information under Wikipedia's general sourcing...
Click to read more »The following are what are considered reliable sources as per Wikipedia policy. These sources are mainly used in motor racing related articles. A description...
Click to read more »WP:NAIJARSWP:NAIJARS Welcome to the Nigerian sources list which is culled from discussions across the community. Curate reliable sources for Nigeria-related information...
Click to read more »meant to exclude other online sources (such as ESPN.com and CNN.com) that are widely considered to be reliable sources. Editors in the college football...
Click to read more »report from 2016 being used by another editor may actually use reliable sources (published university press books and journal articles) and an objective...
Click to read more »This is a list of Korea-related sources and community verdicts on whether they are reliable. Sources deemed unreliable on here should generally not be...
Click to read more »sources listed here can be used for a particular purpose, and this page is not a substitute for understanding Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources....
Click to read more »written in external sources to write this encyclopedia, yet not all sources are equal. The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Verifiability A secondary source summarizes one or more primary or secondary sources. Secondary sources produced by scholars and published by...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep – There must be plenty of sources. Presumer 01:01, 1 January 2001 (UTC) Keep – You should find sources, instead of deleting it. ItsUpToYou 01:01...
Click to read more »This project page lists suggested sources for coordinates to use in Template:Infobox Color. Geni. English: Photo of a Tube of Mummy Brown in a Coffin...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Note: You should use the shortcut {{Wikipedia:RSPLAST}} or the full template path {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »primary sources. All analyses and interpretive or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary or tertiary source and must...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Note: You should use the shortcut {{Wikipedia:RSPSTATUS}} or full template path {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »for web sites which are not news sources. See also citation templates for more on templates for citing open-source web content in Wikipedia articles...
Click to read more »notability guideline states that "no fixed number of sources [are] required .... but multiple sources are generally expected" in order to establish notability...
Click to read more »template displays the "Uses" table cell at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. This template accepts any number of optional unnamed parameters...
Click to read more »to deciding which sources are more reliable than others. Please note that this section is not updated on a regular basis, new sources that are deemed reliable...
Click to read more »page is not Wikipedia:Reliable sources or Wikipedia:Citing sources. Wikipedia is increasingly being used as a source in the world press. Articles citing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Deprecated, and the definitions and information within the WP:DAILYMAIL1 and WP:DAILYMAIL2 RfCs (the first source to be...
Click to read more »information between different sources. The content of the subsections is alphabetically organized. Please add free online sources if you know some that are...
Click to read more »COM WP:ALBUM/SOURCES/ABOUT.COMWP:ALBUM/SOURCES/ABOUT.COM WP:MUSIC/ABOUT.COMWP:MUSIC/ABOUT.COM WP:MUSIC/SOURCES/ABOUT.COMWP:MUSIC/SOURCES/ABOUT.COM The...
Click to read more »to omit it entirely. Do not remove the conflicting sources just because they contradict the sources already in the article. Do not choose which one is...
Click to read more »WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249#Threesome WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 256#Is Cosmopolitan a reliable source? WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive...
Click to read more »Tips Tasks Sources Reports Perennial Shortcuts WP:VSAFE/PERENNIALWP:VSAFE/PERENNIAL WP:VSAFE/SWP:VSAFE/S Perennial sources are sources that appear...
Click to read more »cannot be copyrighted, you must cite the source to avoid plagiarism. Generally no, do not copy text from other sources. This usually is both a copyright violation...
Click to read more »WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 182#Breitbart again WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 185#Daily Kos Elections WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive...
Click to read more »viewpoints presented to reliable, published sources. We should strive to use reliable sources, which according to Sources are peer-reviewed journals and books...
Click to read more »you're looking for a source that isn't a journal article, try the Find your Source guide. For books, you can also use Special:BookSources to search by ISBN...
Click to read more »discussed sources; other good sources do exist that are not listed here. You can help to expand this list by starting a discussion about a source on the...
Click to read more »(no-pay, non-subscription/-membership/-login) online English newspaper sources. As a rule, entries on this list access many thousands or millions of newspaper...
Click to read more »media, traditional sources can be somewhat rare. In addition, the simultaneous development and expansion of Internet-based sources alongside the modern...
Click to read more »list of useful, reliable sources and a custom search engine. Feel free to audit and improve the list with other reliable sources you can find. Many articles...
Click to read more »information on creating references and citing sources on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Adding sources via VisualEditor also uses Zotero; see the...
Click to read more »And it is not potentially dubious sources, it is a majority of useless sources, with some potentially good sources inbetween. No, XLinkBot does not suffice...
Click to read more »reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary...
Click to read more »research current events and news stories. It provides links to reliable sources for Wikipedia articles by way of connections to websites in various parts...
Click to read more »are based on reliable published sources. These guidelines supplement the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Reliable sources with specific attention to the...
Click to read more »articles should be based on reliable secondary sources. When writing an article, choosing high-quality sources is critical to ensure: That each statement...
Click to read more »would find it in reliable sources (for example other encyclopedias and reference works, scholarly journals, and major news sources). This makes it easy to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:BLP#Reliable sources[1] Reliable sources Material about living persons must be sourced very carefully. Without reliable third-party sources, it may include...
Click to read more »extraction of information apply. Similar to other types of sources, maps should not be self-published sources, and the reliability of the publisher should be considered...
Click to read more »a collection of sources and external links related to the club. This page is intended to serve as an easy to access list to sources related to Sheffield...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources WP:UPSD - A user-script that detects and highlights unreliable sources Craig Silverman (April 9, 2010)...
Click to read more »reducing PEIS, which is near capacity at the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources page. See full discussion at WT:RSP#Addressing hard template limits...
Click to read more »subjects they know nothing about – but we then treat them as authoritative sources. Be very careful. Otto Middleton is supposedly a black cocker spaniel who...
Click to read more »word" on a source or an issue about sources and often opinion on sources evolves. So feel free to open a new section on Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard...
Click to read more »"Quality of information sources about mental disorders: A comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources". Psychological Medicine...
Click to read more »with blog entries should not normally be used as sources.' from WP:ATT/FAQ: 'Are weblogs reliable sources?' section: In most cases, no. Most weblogs ("blogs")...
Click to read more »structure of the perennial sources list, and explains how to maintain the list as new discussions appear on the reliable sources noticeboard. Any editor...
Click to read more »have to use any source, only which ones we can use. Sources commonly contain minor errors or points where they disagree with other sources, and such real...
Click to read more »Articles related to 24 need sources like any other Wikipedia article. Content must be verifiable. Editors writing articles in the scope of this project...
Click to read more »sometimes recast in other words, e.g. that the sources already cited should be given primacy over all other sources (as if they have been through some kind of...
Click to read more »should keep in mind while using various types of sources for verifying the statements in an article. Sources can be classified in various ways. The most useful...
Click to read more »reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources. Newsmax has been judged not a reliable source, so the...
Click to read more »additional considerations for citing sources. The information is here so as not to distract from content on the main Citing sources project page, which is designed...
Click to read more »not the sourcing is adequate. Editors knowledgeable about WP:RS would be welcome at Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC]. Many sources have been...
Click to read more »primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. But that is just my two cents as I have been digging for any non-primary sources and RS sources trying...
Click to read more »WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 442#allmovie.com now using film descriptions and actor biographies from Wikipedia WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive...
Click to read more »is a primary source, which is in direct conflict with Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources. Those are usually the worst sources you can get for...
Click to read more »source is. WP:V How reliable a source is depends on context. WP:RS Material about living persons available solely in questionable sources or sources of...
Click to read more »reliable source. In cases where the ethno-racial demographics are contested by other reliable sources, discuss both. Seek high quality academic sources discussing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources with the indication "Generally unreliable" Cinadon36 20:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Source: https://www.quebrada...
Click to read more »inability to verify a source, does not make something unverifiable. For example, there are many news sources and scholarly sources which are behind paywalls...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_251#RfC_on_use_of_CoinDesk (2018) Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_273#RfC_–_CoinDesk_as_a_source (2019)...
Click to read more »disputed, or extraordinary claims; or in cases when a source is not available online. In addition, sources that are not readily available to readers because...
Click to read more »Lenta.ru is a source that has been repeatedly discussed at the Reliable sources noticeboard. This page collects and links information about previous discussions...
Click to read more »discussion, he insists that he doesn't need any sources, but that I am the one who needs to look up reliable sources contradicting him, if I want to remove these...
Click to read more »rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.WP:Sources Though we may report the attributed opinions...
Click to read more »source and "tertiary sources are acceptable sources for general facts which are not controversial" (Wikipedia:Primary_Secondary_and_Tertiary_Sources...
Click to read more »how you can use these sources. This page deals only with the first question: identifying and correctly using self-published sources. Shortcut WP:IDSPSWP:IDSPS...
Click to read more »FRINGE sources against mainstream sources, and then conclude that the claim is BIASED but with no prejudice against the reliability of the source. On the...
Click to read more »date sources—blindlynx 15:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC) Yes in the areas where it broadly aligns with other reliable sources. No as a sole source in potentially...
Click to read more »don't know who they are. Not a usable source IMO. You can't expect the reader to go check our sources sources. Why is "Pew Research 2020, cited in World...
Click to read more »information for sourcing articles, whether through online/print sources or members' personal libraries. Articles related to films need sources like any other...
Click to read more »Not all sources are created equal refers to the belief that two contradicting sources should not always be given equal weight on an article or list. If...
Click to read more »WP:GOLDENRULEWP:GOLDENRULE We need significant coverage. We need multiple sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Not: passing mentions...
Click to read more »reliable sources ought to be held to. The reliable sources guideline provides very limited guidance about what threshold of reliability a source must meet...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles (note that this lists templates for both public domain and non-public domain sources) and attribution templates...
Click to read more »1.5 sources is a term that relates to the use of sources that cannot strictly be categorised as being either primary sources or secondary sources, mostly...
Click to read more »requirement for an article, an article lacking reliable sources should be deleted. No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article. "Keep and improve" is...
Click to read more »The major sources of information of use to Wikipedia are ABC Online, News Limited newspaper websites and SMH/The Age. The distance between cities in Australia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 255#2nd RfC: The Daily Mail --Guy Macon (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Also see: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »— This Gis sources & palettes page aims to collect, list, and describe quickly suitable GIS files available online, but also to provide styles/palettes...
Click to read more »state-operated sources of Venezuela, such as Telesur, are unreliable. Some pro-opposition outlets have also been recognized as sensationalized sources, so their...
Click to read more »articles on facts and verifiable sources. This project will focus on discussing the relevance and the appliance of sources for an article. It is preferable...
Click to read more »reliable sources on a given subject, that consensus of sources should still be what the article appropriately reflects, but that does not make the source itself...
Click to read more »Vaccine Safety Tips Tasks Sources Reports Perennial The following is the bibliography related to vaccines from the National Academy of Sciences...
Click to read more »org WebCitation Reliable independent sources support claims and establish notability per W:GNG. Reliable sources must be verifiable. Most print media...
Click to read more »more sources, or research the sources used by sources, then maybe WP could be imprved as a result, but that is not reason to remove this source. --Andrew...
Click to read more »avoiding sources that trace back to unreliable sources. If you are not sure if the source is reliable then please read WP:IRS or check the reliable source noticeboard...
Click to read more »over-reliance on a particular source or group of like-minded sources? Reviewers should be aware that even the highest-quality sources can be used selectively...
Click to read more »questionable sources may only be used as sources about themselves" -- you are not using Schuman as a source about himself, but as a source on World Scripture...
Click to read more »really a source... it functions more as a publisher of sources, one that specializes in publishing primary sources. As a publisher of primary sources it has...
Click to read more »primary sources (this includes, for example, Plutarch). Inscriptions are also primary sources. Archaeological evidence is also a primary source, but these...
Click to read more »reliable sources intended to inform discussion on the parent page. All editors may add good, useful, reliable and above all pertinent sources here. Any...
Click to read more »a central summary of the source from other reliable sources. This can be useful context for editors choosing which sources to use as well as when discussing...
Click to read more »given in Wikipedia:Cite sources/example style might be helpful. Applying the templates provided by Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles#Citations...
Click to read more »sources in the Ghanaian media landscape. This discussion is intended to be part of a series of discussions assessing the reliability of news sources in...
Click to read more »reliable source: Readers cannot independently verify your identity. Readers cannot independently verify your credentials. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Readers...
Click to read more »Welcome to the Africa Sources List project! The project aims to curate a list of reliable sources for African topics. The Botswana Gazette (https://thegazette...
Click to read more »It is important that sources are chosen and used properly in Wikipedia. References must be reliable sources, used in accordance with the three core content...
Click to read more »Perennial sources list (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination) (Find sources: Google...
Click to read more »the sources of their information, and those sources are valid primary and secondary sources, does that make the site a reliable, secondary source? Cla68...
Click to read more »single source. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Verifiability...
Click to read more »disallow the use of this source in many cases as it reads "Self-published sources should never be used as third-party sources about living persons, even...
Click to read more »better" than the sources, and that therefore these sources must not even be mentioned. The fact that they don't even have a single source rebutting this...
Click to read more »Does the way the source is used complies with WP:NPOV#Undue; is the material corroborated in other sources or it contradicts other sources? Again: there...
Click to read more »not be a reliable source for reviews or establishing notability. It's also listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources#Sources to avoid, which I think...
Click to read more »going on. Secondary sources are not by definition more reliable than primary sources. If a secondary source says that a primary source A is incorrect, that...
Click to read more »or three independent reliable sources to source the material. If one source says that "the other reports...", the sources are not independent. Wait hours...
Click to read more »only source you have. Esn (talk) 22:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC) If however, the information is found in other sources, then just cite the other sources. There...
Click to read more »people are not sources. That's not true. People are sources. If Bill Gates, involved in Microsoft litigation, can't be taken as a source of what the Attorney...
Click to read more »count as reliable sources. I could not find anything in WP:RS, WP:N, WP:CORP that specify that trade journals as not reliable sources. I realize that many...
Click to read more »can configure your wikimail in Special:Preferences. Shared sources: Editors post sources they are willing to share access to at the shared resources...
Click to read more »covered in secondary sources, and most likely if they were to be found in secondary sources, would derive from the primary source anyway.--Wehwalt (talk)...
Click to read more »book or magazine article. If you own one of these sources, feel free to add your name. If a source you own is not on the list, add it to the appropriate...
Click to read more »other sources you have used to write or expand articles. All additions and corrections should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with...
Click to read more »next requirement. Authenticity. Sources must have some evidence of authenticity; we must be reasonably sure that sources are not forgeries or misrepresentations...
Click to read more »If a source is rs, then we do not question its sources. Presumably authors of reliable sources are able to provide judgment in picking sources. However...
Click to read more »asserted that a poor source is better than none. This directly contradicts our philosphy on reliable sources. If we can't find reliable sources for an assertion...
Click to read more »highways. He sources all his information in the logs, but there are no access to the original sources. I do believe that this is a reliable source, but I want...
Click to read more »field, such as academic journals, are excellent sources for facts, they are not always the best sources for or examples of how to present those facts to...
Click to read more »Machinima is intended to serve as a guide to the reliability of various sources that may be used in machinima-related articles. For info on the publisher...
Click to read more »the place, this page provides an overview of known sources (reliable or not) and whether that source may contribute to notability. This table was borrowed...
Click to read more »a space to experiment with editing. You can either edit the source code ("Edit source" tab above) or use VisualEditor (here). Click the "Publish changes"...
Click to read more »secondary source is found, it will be "better" than all the sources that cite older secondary sources. A secondary source that does not cite primary sources, but...
Click to read more »Center Schema-Root.org 13,000 topics, with current headlines from news sources worldwide. Heavily cross-referenced. Al Jazeera (QA) Australian Broadcasting...
Click to read more »is a self published source. It would also be my view that while using the sources he cites would be acceptable as reliable sources, using his site would...
Click to read more »Otherwise I agree with JohnZ that these two "sources" are not sources per se, but means to access the original source. Neither should be "cited" (meaning, when...
Click to read more »example item from that source provides cites of "data from" sources as supporting sources for the material in that item. Your source is owned and operated...
Click to read more »Since this is technically on colonial-era sources, it'd be remiss not to discuss the indigenous sources of this time. Some of these continue to hold...
Click to read more »source of software-related information. The choice of sources should heavily rely on the material they are supposed to support. The primary sources should...
Click to read more »which means the source does not always use proper sourcing or sources to other biased/mixed sources. They may also report well sourced information as well...
Click to read more »previously informed you, Wikipedia is a tertiary source that is built on reliable secondary sources. Primary sources may be used, but only carefully, and whenever...
Click to read more »reference sources to add information to existing articles, create new articles and add to the list of missing topics. Please add references sources to the...
Click to read more »same thing to everyone: ie, none of those Jewish sources are relevant to NT books; Protestant sources won't be relevant for Wisdom or Baruch or the 3rd...
Click to read more »circular references, or deprecated sources) are problematic but used in an acceptable manner (e.g. primary sources about frauds) are misclassified because...
Click to read more »no sources were provided On November 9, User: Navnløs changed "set of beliefs and practices" to "religion." Note: She has not provided any sources to...
Click to read more »Each individual page has a link to source information. The link specifies primary sources plus background sources and references. --Pleasantville (talk)...
Click to read more »Iran and the author cites infoplease.com as the source. Is it reliable enough? I checked other sources; this one says: "Total: Since 1979 over 10,000 people...
Click to read more »reliability of the sources, but I think we can examine whether the sources presented are being quoted correctly (misrepresenting what a source says is a conduct...
Click to read more »cases I used only very new sources (not more than 10 years old) and sources from the early 20th and 19th century. The source from the early 19th century...
Click to read more »Most often, primary sources used in Wikipedia are a form of illustration. They illustrate what reliable secondary and tertiary sources learn about the discussed...
Click to read more »Who/what are their sources? What are the qualifications of their sources? Several questions remain. You are the one who is defending that source. So the way...
Click to read more »HEre[1] they removed the term because aren't primary sources. They also removed these sources with no explanation abd added " a movement which the sociologist...
Click to read more »of a primary source in WP:NOR#cite_note-7. Documents aren't necessarily secondary sources just because they examine other primary sources. For example...
Click to read more »information about films such as Mothra, and notes some sources, but also appears to use self-published sources such as in the article I had previously linked...
Click to read more »reliable source? Collectonian (talk) 05:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Both sources meet the relevant policy's criteria, so they are reliable sources. Still,...
Click to read more »This essay offers a solution: sourced plot summaries. On Wikipedia, editors are not required to use secondary sources for plot summaries per MOS:PLOTSOURCE;...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is grounded in reliable, third-party sources. Webcomics are not such sources. Webcomic characters aren't "noted experts" of the fiction they...
Click to read more »removed sources - my comment there is "It's only supporting technical details that can be confirmed in other sources. It's not the best reliable source, but...
Click to read more »Carpathians . Discuss Participants Articles and images Gallery Trip schedule Sources Contact Kroh, Antoni, Współczesna rzeźba ludowa Karpat Polskich/ Contemporary...
Click to read more »(UTC) I dont need "Islamic sources", Ill use reall sources and in the process of doing so now. For instance, this source describes this story as a "legend"...
Click to read more »considered to be a reliable primary source, although like most historical sources it has its limitations and problems. Other sources may disagree with it, but that...
Click to read more »sources. Wikipedia is a tertiary source. Where a self-published source in an article about itself disagrees with a majority view in reliable sources,...
Click to read more »primary source vs. secondary source. Primary sources can be reliable, but it's good to include secondary sources which interpret the primary source. This...
Click to read more »other reliable sources? If you can find Barrett's quote reported in reliable sources, it should be used over the comments section source. It also needs...
Click to read more »non-reliable sources unless reliable secondary sources cite them. In that case, we would cite the reliable secondary source, not the un-reliable primary source. Jayjg...
Click to read more »a report on people's attitudes to various news sources. In regards to whether people find the source impartial (figures 12.6, 12.9, 12.10, 12.12, 12...
Click to read more »source(s)", can the reported accusation be used in a Wikipedia living person article, or do these normally reliable sources become unusable sources for...
Click to read more »other sources, I'd have no hesitation to use it as a source. If it published information that is disputed by other reliable sources, then both sources can...
Click to read more »considered reliable sources for supposed events that no other reliable sources publish? Specifically, I am taking about this source. The article paints...
Click to read more »amounts to using a primary source in a way that contradicts "non-contemporaneous" sources (a.k.a. evaluative secondary sources that are one step removed...
Click to read more »difficult to find sources with a correct name. All the reliable sources I found call her husband Johannes Ronge. All these articles sources have been removed...
Click to read more »BLP source standards apply to this article, at least in the context that these sources are used, since there seems to be a tendency to these sources to...
Click to read more »Also, Wikipedia:reliable sources#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves (the only cases where a source considered unreliable may...
Click to read more »questionable sources as sources on themselves, and the answer to the second is yes. --Bejnar (talk) 20:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC) Source : Guardian.co...
Click to read more »The source you are disputing is a review article (secondary source) of primary sources. The factual content is all verifiable in the primary sources cited...
Click to read more »reliable published sources. This page provides guidance about how to identify these. The policy pages that discuss the need to use sources are Wikipedia:No...
Click to read more »sources. See DGG's statement below wherein he stated, No source is entirely reliable, almost no source is totally unreliable. The best news sources,...
Click to read more »Is this a "primary source" which ought to be avoided - and use reliable secondary sources in vast preference? It looks like Paul Ryan is having all his...
Click to read more »Scholarly sources are lovely (for scholarly things), but they are not the only sources that actually meet the minimum requirements for a reliable source. WhatamIdoing...
Click to read more »This is a non-exhaustive list of sources usually acceptable sources within typhoon and hurricane season or storm articles, written for editors new to the...
Click to read more »rely on non-existing sources. We rely on sources that exist. Sources that exist state that there is an Allar language. A source instead calls it a dialect...
Click to read more »source, but it can be considered reliable for many issues, and in this case, there are other sources supporting it. Adding those additional sources would...
Click to read more »more) reliable sources conflict, one (or more) of those sources can be demonstrated to be unreliable in this case. For example, one source might specifically...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Reliable sources can cite unreliable sources or no sources at all. It can help establish the reliability of a source if it gets cited, but...
Click to read more »discussion about sources used in the Cordillera de la Ramada article for the heights of various peaks within the range. The particular sources being questioned...
Click to read more »report about filmmaking in 54 African countries, open source for easy quoting! (See / Sources */ at the end of this article for WP attribution to add...
Click to read more »considered a hate and Islamophobic website. (Sources:[1], [2]). I think he violates WP:RS#Extremist_sources, what do you guys think?Bless sins 07:51, 21...
Click to read more »independence of the source will be consequently missing. The removal of these sources would certainly clean many articles from bogey sources; in addition such...
Click to read more »of a musical work. Reliable sources for sheet music include Musicnotes.com and Sheetmusicplus.com. From sheet music sources, editors can deduce much information...
Click to read more »think the sources are ok in this context; the secondary sources obviously use Davner's book, but all information has to come from a primary source at some...
Click to read more »the sources are reliable, and that clearly a lot of others agree. Two of the disputed sources are included on the Wikiproject's reliable source list...
Click to read more »regarding this source. I also have some alternate sources (or additional, if multiple sources would make a difference). These other sources are: http://screenrant...
Click to read more »This page is not Wikipedia:Reliable sources or Wikipedia:Citing sources. Toronto Star, 1 January 2006: "In some parts of Scotland, people celebrate the...
Click to read more »third-party published source for this information; there are an overwhelming number of self-published sources, many of these sources are in (apparently)...
Click to read more »reliable source and whether the sources inserted are considered reliable. We have already substantiated that ExtremeTech and iFixit are reliable sources for...
Click to read more »using non-NPOV sources? By neutrally presenting all sides of the issue, citing sources with different viewpoints (giving each source its due weight)...
Click to read more »See WP:Link rot for more detailed information about archiving sources. Archiving a source is generally helpful, but remember that it's not mandatory. Editors...
Click to read more »reliable source about that well known baseball player, not a single document have been shown by any of the sources cited. Should any of the sources be used...
Click to read more »scaddistrict.com source. Sources like that. The IP is adding any and everything to the article in the hopes of saving it, when the quality sources on this topic...
Click to read more »what degree are Polemic and Apologetic sources considered "Reliable Sources"? In particular: Secular press sources will gladly publish cherry-picking, one-sided...
Click to read more »interpretation with a primary source document (the picture). Citations must be to reliable sources, and reliable sources must have material that directly...
Click to read more »Jewish; and no other sources are readily available to support the book's claim—I'm quite sure the book does not cite its own sources. User:Epeefleche claims...
Click to read more »whether SBM is a self published source. Note that under wikipedia policy self published sources (SPS) and reliable sources (RS) are not mutually exclusive...
Click to read more »secondary sources, and per WP:BLPPRIMARY (which is under a section about reliable sources within WP:BLP) "Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources.....
Click to read more »primary sources. Secondary sources are not necessarily independent or third-party sources." The newspaper article you cited is a secondary source. Both...
Click to read more »over low-quality sources. For non-peer reviewed sources such as newspapers, there is a very real danger that an otherwise reliable source will skimp its...
Click to read more »principle is documented at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Deprecated_sources. Now see the definition of a source at WP:SOURCEDEF; it is not limited to publishing...
Click to read more »policy articles about the suitability of sources for editing article content, for example, the reliability of sources and the verifiability of content. These...
Click to read more »On the page WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, a common classification is "No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply" (also sometimes...
Click to read more »perfect source that you would prescribe on hand. They are often limited by the sources that are available to them, which is why online sources may be favored...
Click to read more »refusal to accept Venezuelan media sources as reliable while unquestioningly accepting American and British news sources as reliable is, in fact, a massive...
Click to read more »source has some kind of bias. If we insisted that reliable sources have no bias, we'd have no sources left. What we require instead is that sources be...
Click to read more »These are not the only academic sources making this claim and I in no way misrepresented the sources in the edit. A source is given in the revert claiming...
Click to read more »sources simply because the sources are celebrity sources or gossip sources (not that I disagree with replacing a celebrity source or a gossip source with...
Click to read more »and keeps removing the fact and the sources from the article. Any thoughts? Also, once this is here are sources like for example: The Soviet Union dismissed...
Click to read more »from many sources. And are the sources they take content from all reliable? Most places that source things to them, do mention the original source they are...
Click to read more »be to unreliable sources (the AOL chat might be my favorite) or to sources that don't actually discuss the claims that this source is being used to report...
Click to read more »not make a source unreliable. It only makes it biased. Wikipedia does not require sources to be unbiased. Articles should be neutral. Sources need to be...
Click to read more »reliable sources for the proposition that she was thin. They are however reliable sources for the negative results of the test, which sources described...
Click to read more »that this is a tertiary source - Tertiary sources such as compendia, encyclopedias, textbooks, and other summarizing sources may be used to give overviews...
Click to read more »October 2009 (UTC) It is a primary source and secondary sources are better. Note that there are a lot of secondary sources about Ford, so there is no reason...
Click to read more »much that isn't so.” Wikipedia requires reliable sources. Wikipedia only reports what those sources say. Wikipedia has many different kinds of editors...
Click to read more »our policies on questionable sources (note the footnote about conflicts of interest) and on using such sources as sources for statements about themselves...
Click to read more »sources. But because an item in a source is 'wrong' doesn't mean it isn't verifiable or that the source should be considered unreliable. All sources can...
Click to read more »IPCS would be considered an overriding source. I’m unable to find your other sources. The fact that some sources were unable to find earlier references...
Click to read more »non-English sources. If you have two sources that are of equivalent stature then you'd pick the English one. But here I'd rather have the Italian source, especially...
Click to read more »Sources with a reputation for reliability frequently use anonymous sources or otherwise do not name every single expert cited in their work. Source confidentiality...
Click to read more »secondary, and tertiary sources. Use of primary sources should always conform to the No original research policy. However, primary sources describing genetic...
Click to read more »argument in WP and sourcing it to the brief, that is a serious problem. Briefs should not be used as sources. Decisions are the primary sources from court cases...
Click to read more »reporting from some or all of the sources, and you should edit accordingly. If one editor is not familiar with some sources, another editor who is can edit...
Click to read more »sources or else we'd have to just paraphrase all parts of all sources. But in practice totally removing all mention of a reliable and notable source is...
Click to read more »sources don't meet the set Wikipedia standards. Various sources like Youtube and other web sources were used to question references. The first source...
Click to read more »me. If it's iffy, toss it. There's no source quota that forces us to use bad sources just to use more sources.—Preceding unsigned comment added by DreamGuy...
Click to read more »unreliable. Reliability of a source is not dependent on whether or not a source is partisan. Per WP:NPOV#Bias in sources, "reliable sources are not required to...
Click to read more »academic source; I just didn't add one yet. Instead, I added your sources diff. So, what's your point, when I myself add your preferred sources? Joshua...
Click to read more »here. You ask me to read WP:SOURCE even though that policy is about sources as used within articles rather than sources presented in talk page arguments...
Click to read more »Primary sources are distinguished from secondary sources, which cite, comment on, or build upon primary sources. To be a secondary source it must be...
Click to read more »There are plenty of sources for the IDF being cruel, but this doesn't seem like a realistic claim. I looked for other sources to back up this and other...
Click to read more »reliable source? For some background, there are other (primary) sources from Wolfe himself verifying this information, but third-party secondary sources are...
Click to read more »hobbyists. It should be replaced by citations to reliable sources (including primary sources) where possible, and removed otherwise. Someguy1221 (talk)...
Click to read more »by reliable sources. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:51, 10 April 2021 (UTC) The sources in question are these: That's a lot of high-quality sources, covering a...
Click to read more »6 May 2012 (UTC) If no other sources have noted this, you are staying true to the sources not mentioning it. this source gives you 21 million views about...
Click to read more »while a similar source provides another, we cannot determine which is correct. But if we use academic sources, they will provide sources, such as a CDC...
Click to read more »On its own, finding that a source claimed to be an expert source disagrees with other sources claimed to be expert sources, is nothing unusual, so it...
Click to read more »The Ottawa Citizen is a reliable source for news however please note WP guidelines for reliable sources: Some sources may be considered reliable for statements...
Click to read more »of the source comes into question. Regarding anonymous sources, WP:BLP says: Be wary of sources ... that attribute material to anonymous sources. Wariness...
Click to read more »events as sources, providing that there's video evidence of said events. Note that I'm not asking about using videos of events as sources. Rather, I'm...
Click to read more »of sources. "According to X, Y - source, X saying Y". If it's not covered by other sources then it's WP:UNDUE. If it is covered by other sources then...
Click to read more »Likely citogenetic; use ISNI's sources where appropriate, if the example link is indicative. The ISNI lists its sources at the bottom of the page, hyperlinked...
Click to read more »is available at www.wrightmusic.net here. It cites no sources, none of his articles cite sources, and the article seems rather personal. I'll also note...
Click to read more »of the source is further borne out by the fact that a host of other reliable sources have published the same thing. A handful of these sources are listed...
Click to read more »removed sources because they were unreliable (self-published and user-generated) and a second editor restored them because they were the only sources and...
Click to read more »can't find secondary sources for all of these. I do confess that most of the content I have here are sourced from primary sources. I'm not really into...
Click to read more »about sources: WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD "Primary sources can be reliable, and they can be used. Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source, such...
Click to read more »as a source? -- Rico 20:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC) I think that what he was trying to argue is that reliable sources can show that other sources are reliable...
Click to read more »source is more than merely reporting the same things actual reliable sources report. It also means having a sound reputation among reliable sources and...
Click to read more »its sources in the footnote and if this source in not RS I will start using those sources from footnote but problem is because and these sources ie informations...
Click to read more »quoting from the source. Moreover, there is an abundance of English sources available. Why resort to non-English sources? The use of such sources nullifies transparency...
Click to read more »is not a reliable source. He occasionally writes in reliable sources. When his opinions are notable, they will be in reliable sources. Daniel Pipes is...
Click to read more »WikiProject Arena Football League Reliable Sources guidelines aim to define what does and does not constitute a reliable source in the world of arena football teams...
Click to read more »Israel Palestine Collaboration/Links to reliable sources discussions For discussion of specific sources which have been judged for reliability, and verified...
Click to read more »you should have no problem finding another source -- one that Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources lists as being "Generally reliable in its areas...
Click to read more »Times are both reliable sources. It remains however, how the sources are being used to interpret the findings in the primary source. This reliability question...
Click to read more »especially if the only current sources are press releases, or to wait until the story is picked up by reliable news sources. WP:CRYSTAL applies, if the announced...
Click to read more »including that some sources are reliable sources for some facts but not for others, but it would still be useful to be able to say that Source X is generally...
Click to read more »reliable source? It may not be the best source, and if we have better sources contradicting it, then of course we can dsicount it; but sources from 1910...
Click to read more »primary self-published source. Normally we only include self-published sources for uncontroversial statements, and secondary sources are always preferred...
Click to read more »it like an WP:RS inline source. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC) Authors of secondary sources use sources that often don't meet reliability...
Click to read more »because it comes from an anonymous source. We depend on reliable sources to evaluate the credibility of less well-known sources for us. --Jc3s5h (talk) 22:15...
Click to read more »considered reliable sources. -- œ™ 02:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC) Those are quite extraordinary claims backed up only by semi-reliable sources. If it was for...
Click to read more »in reliable sources; in those cases the theses may also be looked upon as being reliable. I'd have to read the report and see what sources are cited for...
Click to read more »specify this is not the only source I use, we also use published sources for this article. As I said I'm aware online sources have to be used with caution...
Click to read more »determine whether or not a source is reliable under the WP !rules. Reliable sources, to put it very briefly, are sources with a good reputation that...
Click to read more »than those "reliable" sources. We don't include crap sourced to fake news sources, even if some other "non-fake" news sources do. But that doesn't matter;...
Click to read more »classify this source as non-reliable. If they mention their sources for specific data somewhere on their website, it's better to use those sources as citations...
Click to read more »cite these as a primary source. Care should be taken when handling primary sources; we have to insure that secondary sources exist to demonstrate weight...
Click to read more »blog sources to make a political statement, causing significant undue weight issues anyway. All the points can be made using reliable, non-blog sources. The...
Click to read more »according to "Self-published ... sources as sources on themselves", within Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. (It would be most unreasonable to...
Click to read more »American newspapers, news sources and other U.S. government, media and NGO sources. Only one source is from an Azerbaijani source - an article by Dr. Paul...
Click to read more »non-government sources; for assessing their independence, see WP:NZNGS. The following is a non-exhaustive list of government sources required to use...
Click to read more »this if we had no other source, but we do not have to use it if there are other good sources, and if there are better sources, for example more recent...
Click to read more »topic or the source, but generally speaking, newspapers are considered reliable sources. WP:CIRCULAR says that we shouldn't use sources that present material...
Click to read more »the above sources are "primary news sources" and not reliable enough to make this statement as written above. I understand that these sources are not as...
Click to read more »the source. Taher would have to explicitly say that the other sources are wrong for you to use it as a reference to prove that the other sources are wrong...
Click to read more »Jstor.org is a place that hosts sources. It is not a source but a resource for finding sources (like Google). What sources did you find there to cite? alislam...
Click to read more »These are links and sources that may help this taskforce develop. Feel free to add your own....
Click to read more »reliable source, and that I do not see written in these sources. Debresser (talk) 22:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC) When reliable sources cite a source, and do...
Click to read more »basis that the provided sources are political opinions by left-wing or Jewish websites and non facts.. The referred texts are sources 14-17. Can you please...
Click to read more »Azerbaijan Province etc. ( [1]) Source: http://www.azeri.dk/en/articles/summay_of_azerbaijan_history.pdf This is a paper without sources. I think this paper was...
Click to read more »sources" (second part of the table). If we are to accept that the authors of the two sources in question here were using another information source different...
Click to read more »discouraged for this type of data when other sources are available; relying on published secondary sources is preferred to using primary census data. However...
Click to read more »people had with these sources was that they assumed I was the author, which is incorrect, and I can happily substantiate via IRL sources, as well as my communication...
Click to read more »nations. Identifying reliable sources in historical areas that are contentious topics is complicated because the sources and their authors reflect national...
Click to read more »sources other than Emporis and primary sources such as the building's developer. In this case, then, you would say that Emporis is a reliable source?...
Click to read more »other source that could a WP:COPYVIO--Shrike (talk) 11:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Maps should cite their sources, usually there are too many sources involved...
Click to read more »absolutely unacceptable for sourcing? An article that cites fake sources is worse than an article that cites no sources at all. --Florian Blaschke (talk)...
Click to read more »depreciation for *every* mainland news source besides Xinhua. The other government sources are worse and the “independent” sources don’t exist for our purposes...
Click to read more »dispute about reliable sources is that one source is biased and so another source should be given preference. The bias in sources argument is one way to...
Click to read more »view, as to bias in sources: A common argument in a dispute about reliable sources is that one source is biased and so another source should be given preference...
Click to read more »cited sources above, and the essays they are referencing are not the sources being disputed in that Rape/Germany article. Nothing in these cited sources say...
Click to read more »filmibeat.com and tollywood.net as sources for articles related to films. I would like to know whether these sources are reliable,if not please add those...
Click to read more »Primary sources are distinguished from secondary sources, which cite, comment on, or build upon primary sources, though the distinction is not a sharp one....
Click to read more »for citing sources is to make sure that no mistakenly believes that an article is the author's own work, we might as well not cite sources, because no...
Click to read more »displays the "Alexa rankings" table cell at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. The template only accepts numbered parameters. Odd-numbered parameters...
Click to read more »argument: i.e. that sources need editorial oversight to qualify as reliable sources. IP appears to seek an exemption from this, as the source is highly relevant...
Click to read more »secondary sources good sources for the content listed below? Source: Youth Connection charter set to fire teachers, union cries foul Source: Chicago Charter...
Click to read more »say they are impeccable as sources. --Relata refero (disp.) 08:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Religious sources are reliable sources for religious viewpoints,...
Click to read more »I want Wikipedia to create NDTV as a reliable source here Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. --2409:4061:2D46:D1C1:2968:8E8B:BE20:71BF (talk)...
Click to read more »reliable source. The general rule is this: a reliable source does not have to cite its sources at all. Therefore, we do not dismiss sources simply because...
Click to read more »reliable sources and a brief description How?: Just click edit source, and compose the request as follows (please don't use Wikipedia articles as sources): [[Mark...
Click to read more »are based on reputable sources that the site's editors can check for accuracy, then Wikipedia should find and cite those sources, not this website. High-quality...
Click to read more »principal source for why the sites are on the list, so these sources are not "new" sources. It would be akin to trying to claim that a source that primarily...
Click to read more »All sources in the sourced version specifically and clearly mention six-star rank. None of the "sources" in the unsourced version are reliable sources. DrKiernan...
Click to read more »things - whether a source is reliable and whether a source is being spammed. Sources which pass all the requirements of reliable sources can still be spammed...
Click to read more »sources, for the same reasons given above.--79.7.78.58 (talk) 13:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 1. Sources. The book or web page being used as the source...
Click to read more »self-published source, and admissible as per Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves:...
Click to read more »not primarily be sourced to popular sources or "primary" scientific sources. If there's already a secondary (ie: journal article) source then sometimes...
Click to read more »reliable source. As for witnesses in trials, we don't allow use of court documents like transcripts as sources because they are primary sources, but if...
Click to read more »a self-published source that fails WP:RS. If there are obvious secondary sources that cite his blog then they can be used as sources, but this is a primary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:MILMOS#SOURCES starts essentially we referred to reliable sources, which ultimately brings us here again to answer the question whether a particular source can...
Click to read more »reliable independent secondary sources" – This is not true. You can WP:USEPRIMARY sources. You can use non-WP:Independent sources (e.g., nearly every article...
Click to read more »primary and secondary sources are available, one should cite both. While primary sources are more "accurate", secondary sources provide more context and...
Click to read more »citing reliable sources. Confirm that these sources support the content, then use them directly.", which means, the external reliable source (not Wikidata)...
Click to read more »to source the information that establishes the subject's real-world notability to independent, third-party sources. Reliance on independent sources ensures...
Click to read more »used sources that I consider unacceptable per WP:RS. Its use of these sources can be seen in this edit. They are both online sources. The first source can...
Click to read more »there are plenty of sources calling them hate groups, and we should use those sources instead of the SPLC. If the SPLC is the only source, then the "hate...
Click to read more »WP:WPBFSWP:WPBFS This page offers a list of suggested sources for articles relating to the Bahá'í Faith. The sources below are classified according to their type:...
Click to read more »controversy is poorly sourced, includes unverified statements (unreliable sources of Times of India which mentions as "sources in BJP"; name of no big...
Click to read more »seen someone try to invalidate a source by doing peer review on its sources. In every context I have been in where sources were questioned and someone tried...
Click to read more »"Serious reliable sources always qualify info that comes from TF" to "serious reliable sources always qualify info that comes from [any source]" and you...
Click to read more »primary source to a war that he was involved in, Wikipedia's guideline allows us to use primary sources with caution. The use of primary sources are often...
Click to read more »sources together because they both appear on Alex Saab’s page. An editor has placed an unreliable source tag against a number of statements sourced to...
Click to read more »primary sources. Nothing to do with Wikipedia here -- one good reason why we are chary of using primary sources. I'd say al-Jazeera is a reliable source, but...
Click to read more »scholarly sources for this topic, so there is no need to use self-published sources. Sixth, Penbat (talk · contribs) has continued to add material sourced to...
Click to read more »WP:Identifying reliable sources Source reliability falls on a spectrum: highly reliable sources, clearly unreliable sources, and many in the middle....
Click to read more »Clement as a source: I'd rather have an expert weight the sources and create a framework. The majority of the sources are published - primary sources are mainly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Verifiability, such sources are essentially columns and should be used with caution. Per Wikipedia:Reliable sources, such source are rarely reliable for...
Click to read more »WP:SELFSOURCE itself says... "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, especially in articles about...
Click to read more »reliable source even though it does not meet the definition of a reliable source set out in that policy. Sources either are reliable sources or they are...
Click to read more »up on sources, but while we often make generalizations about sources, sources aren't the focus in these discussions. Claims are. If the source is reliable...
Click to read more »redskin=bloody scalp/skin: we have the primary sources (e.g. Suzan Harjo), who have been referred to in secondary sources (e.g. the Slate and the ICT articles above)...
Click to read more »Neither is it the case the source has been singled out, we have multiple restrictions on sources per the perennial sources list that's linked in guidelines...
Click to read more »that it isn't a reliable source, unless there are other sources to confirm it as reliable. To quote from WP:Reliable Sources (the relevant section being...
Click to read more »Primary Sources Age of Exploration American History Primary Sources Articles of Confederation and Const. Convention American History Primary Sources Clash...
Click to read more »Wikipedia_talk:Identifying_reliable_sources#Is_there_a_list_of_unreliable_sources.3F. It includes one example, with links, of a source I did not previously know...
Click to read more »dominion within the British Empire Thanks! We have a source. Two sources. Two contemporary sources, if we regard the Anglo-Irish Treaty as contemporary...
Click to read more »popular press for medical statements, use peer-reviewed secondary sources over primary sources. The single biggest problem occurring in medical articles I've...
Click to read more »writing neutrally from given sources. All too often, I've seen assertions that sources shouldn't be used because the source or its authors have a POV. As...
Click to read more »in similar cases, we allow WP:BIASED sources, and we allow sources that sometimes make mistakes; but when a source has a clear, overriding bias that seems...
Click to read more »là: Is a newspaper article a primary source?; Primary and Secondary Sources: A Research Guide, Primary sources include: ... newspaper reports "from the...
Click to read more »source being discussed was a god collection of primary sources. Primary sources are not banned but should be limited in use. These types of sources will...
Click to read more »to Edit-a-thons Dance Brussels/Intro Go to Edit-a-thons Dance Brussels/Sources Go to Edit-a-thons Dance Brussels/Expand existing articles (ENG) Go to...
Click to read more »uncontroversial content that easily can be sourced by other sources (quick googling provides reliables sources right away). So don't waste time on pointless...
Click to read more »as a source to verify a words etymology - where other sources are available from linguistic experts. If there are no dissenting or better sources available...
Click to read more »a list of sources commonly used in ice hockey–related articles. Inclusion on this list is not an inherent indication of reliability. Sources which have...
Click to read more »the appearance of a new source would not undo the decision made on the sources reviewed at the DRN. You agreed to: "if new sources pro or con are developed...
Click to read more »reliable secondary sources. Citations of closed campaigns might be usable as primary sources when used to supplement reliable secondary sources, but those cases...
Click to read more »4-option RfC for source reliability would allow for WP:BIASED sources to also be WP:GREL, which is in line with the reliable sources guideline. The current...
Click to read more »chamber of cable news, and the internet sources that are connected to them. If you can find neutral scholarly sources, that's a better bet for reliability...
Click to read more »presumably the sources it cites can be used to confirm the results of more recent research (and, if needed, any sources the source's sources cite). Someone's...
Click to read more »contributor pointed out that sources support the wording. I would like to look into whether the sources qualify as reliable sources. The first one I am looking...
Click to read more »concern. Sources are allowed to do OR, and reliable sources should do OR. It is just Wikipedia editors who are not to. The failure to cite precise source details...
Click to read more »of sources used here. Details are included into the linked discussion. I've addressed several guys listed here asking them to confirm the sources. But...
Click to read more »quarterly) report that provides an overview of the use of self-published sources across Wikipedia projects, as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia reliability...
Click to read more »the only source at the time using the Harvard referencing, and all substantial additional edits (where I have added information with sources) have been...
Click to read more »gives detailed advice on sources to support content about biomedical information in the Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) ("MEDRS") guideline...
Click to read more »field, secondary sources may include textbooks, review articles, and peer-reviewed articles publishing original research. Secondary sources are best used...
Click to read more »me the peer reviewed sources that criticize it. There is no noticeboard for independence of sources, and on top of that the sources are independent because...
Click to read more »reliable sources FAQ: "Are there sources that are "always reliable" or sources that are "always unreliable"? No. The reliability of a source is entirely...
Click to read more »reliable sources about that movement. Indeed, our sourcing policies generally emphasize the use of secondary sources and of independent sources. The fact...
Click to read more »considered a reliable source) with WP:ABOUTSELF (which is a restrictive exemption granted to all questionable sources and self-published sources). — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »source – list of academic works citing Wikipedia as a source. Help:Find sources – a place that helps access reliable sources. Wikipedia:Book sources –...
Click to read more »secondary source that references various primary Reliable Sources, then what in Wikipedia's rules could possibly prevent those primary sources from being...
Click to read more »list is un-sourced. could you add your sources here?Happydaise (talk) 05:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC) It seems to me like the issue is that sources support...
Click to read more »a reliable source". OK - so what is a reliable source? From WP:SELFSOURCE, "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »published sources. These policies mean that Wikipedians are highly vulnerable to accusations of plagiarism because we must stick closely to sources, but not...
Click to read more »reliable (primary) source for The Zeitgeist Movement? For example, as a reliable (primary) source (used in support of reliable secondary sources) for some of...
Click to read more »"secondary source" and "third party". "Secondary" does not necessarily mean "independent" or "uninvolved". Most independent sources are not secondary sources. Primary...
Click to read more »This page lists sources which have been assessed reliable for use in IRC articles, and the reasoning for them. See Talk for discussion of the processes...
Click to read more »"They're reliable sources, so they're reliable sources about phil. sci." ignores the role of context in determining whether a source is reliable. I am...
Click to read more »I wouldn't mind sources like Ars Technica being used to cite noncontroversial information, but I have a suspicion that this source and several other "tech...
Click to read more »BBC is a reliable source. We neither prefer primary sources, nor do we require the secondary sources we use to say what primary sources they have used....
Click to read more »unsourced or poorly sourced; (2) is a conjectural interpretation of a source; (3) relies on self-published sources, or relies on sources that fail in some...
Click to read more »reliable source than Nature, sure, but that does not make any of these sources inherently/completely unreliable. One must simply use multiple sources, especially...
Click to read more »refer to WP:RS for Wikipedia's official stance. Some sources are more reliable than others. Sources that are more reliable are preferred over those that...
Click to read more »not being reliable sources since they all have their partisans on this website. Why is it just UK media sources - that is sources from a country that...
Click to read more »reliable sources. The evidence presented by Snooganssnoogans shows that Bellingcat is frequently used by other reliable sources. The site's open-source intelligence...
Click to read more »reliable sources does not give it credibility, as those sources implicitly admit that it lacks credibility. Indeed, this particular source starts out...
Click to read more »This a list of links relevant to the project that can be used as sources or for research. History of the monarchy The official website of Her Majesty...
Click to read more »questionable. Questionable sources should only be used as sources of material on themselves. That means not using a questionable source for facts about the movie...
Click to read more »2012}}</ref><ref name=motherjones/><ref name=Forbes/> Are the first two sources "reliable sources" in the context of a BLP? My belief is that opinion articles named...
Click to read more »WP:MILMOS#SOURCES which governs the acceptability of sources in the article in question. Fifelfoo (talk) 03:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC) This source is clearly...
Click to read more »February. There are no sources yet which contradict the sources of Linda McQuaig nor Doug Saunders. If you can find such a source, I would be happy to rest...
Click to read more »not the source of the reliability. Per Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Definition_of_a_source: "The word "source" when citing sources on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »policies: WP:SOURCE allows the use of primary sources in certain conditions that are met here. WP:HISTRS allows the use of primary sources when used in...
Click to read more »is not the best source for this. We have better sources like The Guardian, The Independent, and The Hill, and equal-or-worse sources like People, The...
Click to read more »technically, claims from news sources are not exactly a good counter against academic sources. If Olson is a bad source, then there ought to be other...
Click to read more »expertise tells you that a source is wrong is to find corrections or sources that point out the error; if no such sources exist, then it's possible that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_58#FitzPatrick_.26_Reynolds.2C_False_Profits, Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_58#Quoting_an_RS_source_citing_non-RS_sources...
Click to read more »start would be the red links on wikipedia:News sources. This will help us to maintain NPOV in our news sources. Cable News Network (CNN) (US) MSNBC (US) FOX...
Click to read more »This can easily sourced to much stronger sources than Pipes or McCarthy, and I don't think either of these sources is preferable source where others exist:...
Click to read more »"containing analysis and commentary" a notable source when not referred to by independent sources, and a reliable source for I-P related topics that it be used...
Click to read more »self-published source, and admissible as per Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves:...
Click to read more »This page is not Wikipedia:Reliable sources or Wikipedia:Citing sources. Broadsword and the Beast was cited in a feature story in The A.V. Club titled...
Click to read more »from primary sources, secondary sources that present the same material are preferred", Large blocks of material based purely on primary sources should be...
Click to read more »subject-matter expert or a reliable source. If his view is repeated by reliable sources, then use those reliable sources. Whether someone has an article on...
Click to read more »"independent" source. This is also seen in WP:Independent sources, for example. To determine notability, it is worthwhile to look for independent sources which...
Click to read more »are all primary sources, but some editors believe that the newspaper report—the least accurate of these sources—is a secondary source and therefore automatically...
Click to read more »guidance note along the lines of: Biased / opinionated sources should not be used as primary sources but may be cited where (a) the author is a noted expert...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deprecated sources#Acceptable uses of deprecated sources states that "Deprecated sources can normally be cited as a primary source when the source itself...
Click to read more »secondary sources, as required by WP. Secondary sources means, you can cite a statement made elsewhere, in a reliable, verifiable, authoritative source. This...
Click to read more »reliable they are as academic sources. If a thesis has been cited by other academic sources, it may be a reliable source, but generally speaking, they...
Click to read more »a quote where multiple sources (but not reliable sources on quote attribution) claim that a famous person said it, no source has bothered to say it is...
Click to read more »Primary sources in classical studies include all the literary, inscriptional, and archaeological evidence from the ancient world. Ancient literary sources such...
Click to read more »reliable sources. This is my first FAC so I'm not quite sure what to do. Can anybody help me with this process? The two sources are; a reliable source? Trade...
Click to read more »that there are other sources that give a different date of birth/death (sources that are considered more reliable than the SPS source), then I would go with...
Click to read more »Hello and welcome to the sources list for the Greater Manchester WikiProject. If you believe you have a helpful reliable source that can help the project...
Click to read more »60#Sourcewatch WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 75#Sourcewatch WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 214#Is SourceWatch a reliable source under the Exceptions...
Click to read more »sources do! So why would anybody ever use them as a source! Peta.org would fail to be called a "reliable source" under the Wikipedia reliable sources...
Click to read more »meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable source. Like text sources, media sources must be produced by a reliable third-party and be properly...
Click to read more »infinity. That "all" or "most" sources say this appears to go beyond the sources provided and needs additional sourcing. @Objective300: I thought you were...
Click to read more »directly from a primary source (the study itself) rather than secondary sources as would be preferable. What reliable secondary sources do discuss, and describe...
Click to read more »How could a primary source consistent with the conclusive MEDRS secondary sources be inferior to inconclusive secondary sources? EllenCT (talk) 20:11...
Click to read more »given area or topic tagged as unsourced or needing more sources for verification, though sources can be added to any article with unsourced claims needing...
Click to read more »and more sources. There are lots of sources on Del. Now, there are certain parts of the article in which I've sourced with lots of sources. Some of his...
Click to read more »secondary source that references various primary Reliable Sources, then what in Wikipedia's rules could possibly prevent those primary sources from being...
Click to read more »should be in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. When I joined Wikipedia, I used to refer this list for every source I use, just to make sure that...
Click to read more »quite clear. But, if we have numerous expert sources (note that I keep saying "expert sources" meaning sources with a good reputation who specialize in the...
Click to read more »of the sources Wetrace cited are simply speculating, and there is no consensus regarding the addition of such items. There are other sources which dispute...
Click to read more »This page is not Wikipedia:Reliable sources or Wikipedia:Citing sources. Terdiman, Daniel. "To delete Wikipedia entry or not to delete?" CNET News.com...
Click to read more »involve many primary and secondary sources, especially when those sources contradict each other." It seem that this source is used exactly for that purpose...
Click to read more »factual source in academic literature and reliable news sources. This particular report has been widely cited as factual by many different news sources.[24][25][26]...
Click to read more »of open-source development. The open-source model, or collaborative development from multiple independent sources, generates an increasingly more diverse...
Click to read more »reliable source, the figures in this section have references to reliable sources. Note that 100,000 is the ceiling figure among the reliable sources. By only...
Click to read more »because scholarly sources state that Iraq and the MEK were involved in all these operations. In response Idealigic has pointed to some sources that mention...
Click to read more »source. Here's a diff, before and after. Reason given seems to be WP:Linkfarm. On the other hand sources were given even if they were primary sources...
Click to read more »deprecated sources more leniently than merely bad sources. Your proposal literally protects a deprecated source more than it does a mediocre source, and that...
Click to read more »WP:Verifiability, WP:Identifying reliable sources, and WP:No original research § Primary, secondary and tertiary sources. As of 2020,[update] the points below...
Click to read more »them, are primary sources and not secondary sources. As such we are to use them with extreme caution if at all. The secondary source that discusses them...
Click to read more »while Cryptome is not a good source,it may lead to good sources. Though without further corroboration unnamed sources may be too little to meet WP:DUE...
Click to read more »to find better sources. However, it would probably be best to avoid sources that don't discuss Murray in detail. By that I mean a source that says, "some...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_365#Dozens_of_scraper-plagiarism_websites - original discussion Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_357#Fr24_News...
Click to read more »control to be considered a reliable source. Journalists and academics use all kinds of data sources, including sources that would be considered unreliable...
Click to read more »that these sources should be admissible, because a few authors of books published through O'Reilley Media suggested these as good sources in their opinion...
Click to read more »(and captions) as reliable source for content. I agree with some of the others that Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources is probably not the best...
Click to read more »The source appears to be a reliable source only for the opinions of the subject of Arin Hanson. Secondary sources are preferred, by primary sources are...
Click to read more »(UTC) I wouldn't call NYT "the most reliable of reliable sources". We tend to rate scholarly sources higher than journalism. (t · c) buidhe 03:52, 31 December...
Click to read more »Tripadvisor as a source. I understand that this source should be included in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources as an unreliable source, as the site...
Click to read more »pointed out that adult sources might be considered in context to what is being sourced, the editor requests me to qualify the sources as authoritative and...
Click to read more »source to make this conclusion' . Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Questionable_and_self-published_sources allows use of self published sources...
Click to read more »org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_220#Daily_Mail_RfC and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#2nd_RfC:_The_Daily_Mail...
Click to read more »The Wikipedia SourceWatch is a new project designed to find unreliable sources cited by Wikipedia. The SourceWatch's creator presents a brief history...
Click to read more »The relevant part of Wikipedia:Reliable sources is Self-published sources: "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by...
Click to read more »secondary sources report on this monograph. The question is whether the original monograph or the secondary sources is the more reliable source for the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable source examples Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight WP:Suggested sources – List of specific reliable sources Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »should be listed as an unreliable source on the list found at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Sources. In this article published by the website...
Click to read more »assessment of sources, as if we are all just expressing our opinions without relying at all on reliable sources and what they say about said source. In conclusion...
Click to read more »