sentence, compare: Shortcut MOS:SOURCELISTMOS:SOURCELIST Lists, whether they are stand-alone lists (also called list articles) or embedded lists, are encyclopedic...
Click to read more »Short URL w.wiki/4paF ↓ Jump to the list of frequently discussed sources. ↓ This is a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »sources/Perennial sources, a list of frequently discussed sources List of academic databases and search engines List of digital library projects List of online...
Click to read more »SOURCES The following list consists of recommended sources for expanding articles that primarily or exclusively cover musical topics. This list is...
Click to read more »Typically, the source is listed on User:XLinkBot/RevertList and User:XLinkBot/RevertReferencesList. XLinkBot automatically reverts links to the source that are...
Click to read more »society, rather than offering a directory listing or the contents of a sales brochure. In determining the type of source, there are three separate, basic characteristics...
Click to read more »reliable sources, depending on the particular topic (see below: List of suggested sources). There are the general Wikipedia policies: WP:Reliable sources (WP:RS)...
Click to read more »The following list is meant to help you with your own research, by offering links to respectable information sources on the web, available free of charge...
Click to read more »WP:CTTWP:CTT This page contains the following: Issues with sources: this is for tagging issues with sources; they are either inline tags, or message boxes for...
Click to read more »the citation or reference is the list of full references, which provides complete, formatted detail about the source, so that anyone reading the article...
Click to read more »speculative proposals that are not reliable sources for biomedical topics. The Abridged Index Medicus provides a list of 114 selected "core clinical journals"...
Click to read more »respectively. If you are citing a source along with an expert summary, it is helpful to list them together, with the main source first to indicate that it is...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:ACSOWP:ACSO Below is a list of academic works citing Wikipedia as a source. It excludes studies of Wikipedia, and non-academic works such...
Click to read more »a source should not be determined by the list of people (famous or otherwise) that were involved in editing it, especially if the people are listed as...
Click to read more »reliable sources without implying any conclusions derived from improper synthesis. Invariably, articles will quite rightly draw from more than one source. So...
Click to read more »News Plus Wrestling News Source Wrestling Rumors Yardbarker[citation needed] List of professional wrestling magazines List of professional wrestling...
Click to read more »suggestions as a starting point for research. The following list consists of recommended sources for expanding Christian music articles about albums, songs...
Click to read more »An annotated list of sources for food and drink articles. The goal is to help editors find reliable sources of information on food topics. This page is...
Click to read more »WP:Suggested sources – List of specific reliable sources Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - List of commonly discussed sources WP:UPSD, a user...
Click to read more »sources in context! Before posting, check the archives and list of perennial sources for prior discussions. Context is important: supply the source,...
Click to read more »intended as a supplement to the reliable sources noticeboard and perennial sources list, to help page reviewers unfamiliar with a given subject assess notability...
Click to read more »reliability. A list of sources that have been identified by the WP:VG community as reliable appears lower in this page at the Sources list. This list is neither...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable list. These wikis are not notable, and they don't meet WP:SOURCELIST. Some barely even have any edits. ProcrastinatingReader...
Click to read more »required}}, are listed in Template:Link note#See also. Editors at these projects may be able to help you determine whether a given source supports the material...
Click to read more »as "are cited". Therefore, rather than judging a single-source article non-notable and listing it for deletion, please add the template {{onesource}} at...
Click to read more »inclusion in this list does not guarantee that a source meets Wikipedia's sourcing criteria. See also Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Specialized...
Click to read more »(essay; a bullet list of sourcing mistakes) WP:Party and person (essay; distinctions between terms like "tertiary" and "third party") WP:Sources – SWOT analysis...
Click to read more »to List of Marvel Comics characters: B, but I think this violates WP:SOURCELIST. The entry is overall more suited to a wikia. --Killer Moff (talk) 08:47...
Click to read more »WP:NAIJARSWP:NAIJARS Welcome to the Nigerian sources list which is culled from discussions across the community. Curate reliable sources for Nigeria-related information...
Click to read more »If you add an article, please cite both the title and the source. Note that if you're listing an article from a traditional press wire service that ran...
Click to read more »sources listed here can be used for a particular purpose, and this page is not a substitute for understanding Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources....
Click to read more »This is a list of Korea-related sources and community verdicts on whether they are reliable. Sources deemed unreliable on here should generally not be...
Click to read more »suitable as a source for this list? The other sources look fine at first glance. I'll go through in a bit more detail and aim to complete the source review in...
Click to read more »talk:Book sources – For questions and discussion about the Book Sources pages Wikipedia:ISBN – Guidelines for use of ISBNs on Wikipedia List of academic...
Click to read more »develops its own list of useful, reliable sources and a custom search engine. Feel free to audit and improve the list with other reliable sources you can find...
Click to read more »verifiability, citations, reliable sources, living persons, non-free content and what Wikipedia is not) a featured list has the following attributes: Prose...
Click to read more »represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a verifiable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each. Now an important...
Click to read more »Welcome to the Africa Sources List project! The project aims to curate a list of reliable sources for African topics. The Botswana Gazette (https://thegazette...
Click to read more »included in this list if it evaded detection for more than one month or was discussed by reliable sources in the media. Do not list Wikipedia April Fools'...
Click to read more »following templates can be used for articles listed here: *{{Find sources|Article name}} - Adds source search options *{{lagafd|Article name}} - Adds...
Click to read more »Perennial sources list (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination) (Find sources: Google...
Click to read more »Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject This list has numerous unsourced statements. How up-to-date is this anyway? Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:42, 15 August...
Click to read more »someone else in what to write. Consultants are listed for some children's (and perhaps adult new reader) sources, but the role of the consultants is often...
Click to read more »reliable, secondary sources. If an article lacks secondary sources that reasonably demonstrate its importance, it may be listed for deletion. Peer-reviewed...
Click to read more »They aren’t. Mccapra (talk) 07:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC) Please see WP:SOURCELIST; this is precisely why Wikipedia is not reliable. Regards, --Goldsztajn...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:List of citogenesis incidents Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Self-references to avoid Wikipedia:Verifiability § Wikipedia and sources that mirror...
Click to read more »the source for that example set of primary, secondary, and tertiary color names. List of Crayola crayon colors A wikipedia article is never a source; this...
Click to read more »second one: when I use this source its for titles from the past which the info is published in a book. If ROH publishes a list for the reigns, this is unnecessary...
Click to read more »this list or if you know of another user who has, please feel free to update the list accordingly but make sure you provide a viable reference source (such...
Click to read more »Inclusion in lists contained within articles should be determined by WP:SOURCELIST, in that the entries must have the same importance to the subject as would...
Click to read more »be added as sourced prose." Finally, WP:SOURCELIST reminds that core Wikipedia guidelines, especially "verifiability (through good sources in the item's...
Click to read more »as primary sources and review articles as secondary sources. Book reviews may be found listed under separate sections within a news source or might be...
Click to read more »or opinions do not belong. Below is a list of Eurovision-related websites that provide Eurovision news. This list can be reviewed at any given time to...
Click to read more »recent changes to guideline pages. List of policies and guidelines – a list of the principal policies and guidelines. List of policies – a comprehensive descriptive...
Click to read more »in-depth references". It's a good idea to check the list of "perennial sources" to see if a source is listed as "deprecated", "banned", or otherwise found to...
Click to read more »help to expand this list by starting a discussion about a source on the talk page. Note: There is no guarantee that sources listed here can be used for...
Click to read more »structure of the perennial sources list, and explains how to maintain the list as new discussions appear on the reliable sources noticeboard. Any editor...
Click to read more »WP:NLIST and WP:Sourcelist is explicitly said that Veriafibility and adequate references are required for every element of the list. It is also required...
Click to read more »These are some Frequently Asked Questions about Wikipedia's guidelines on sourcing for medical content, manual of style for medicine-related articles, and...
Click to read more »is only one named source for the entire list/article. I find it hard to believe that all this information came from just one source. Colin°Talk 09:39...
Click to read more »a featured list. The list is not comprehensive, the Novels/Manga and Radio Drama sections need more work. There is a huge lack of source citations. Kariteh...
Click to read more »of "reliable" sources through circular reporting. This is a list of some well-documented cases in which Wikipedia has been the source. To count as an...
Click to read more »not acceptable as sources. These might be useful to read to find more reliable sources of information, but shouldn't be used as sources in citations. They...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »reliable as sources on music-related articles. This list arose out of a consensus regarding which About.com critics can be considered a reliable source. Generally...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »online databases listed below include free full text. If you're looking for a source that isn't a journal article, try the Find your Source guide. For books...
Click to read more »Sources WikiProject COVID-19: Sources NewsQ Vaccine Safety Resource List Vaccine Safety Net MDWiki Images Data Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources...
Click to read more »recent changes to policy pages. List of policies and guidelines – a list of principal policies and guidelines. List of guidelines – a comprehensive descriptive...
Click to read more »a reference citation includes wikilinks to the relevant article for the source, such as The New York Times, rather than The New York Times. For a citation...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »complete) only then remove it from the list. The list was compiled from the following sources though no source was used in toto: Episode Guide Tv.com...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »Cashew is not a botanical nut but it is on the list, peanut is a culinary nut, but it isn't. Separation by source (probably the best way to go with all culinary...
Click to read more »subject of debate. This page, the vaccine safety perennial sources list, works to assess sources specifically in the context of their reliability for information...
Click to read more »military history Bibliography of Canadian military history List of primary and secondary sources on the Cold War Bibliography of Colditz Castle Bibliography...
Click to read more »identify: Is this source self-published or not? (If so, then see Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published sources.) Is this source independent or third-party...
Click to read more »nature of what exactly constitutes an unreliable source, as well as imperfect matching algorithms, the list may feature publications and publishers which...
Click to read more »22:02, 4 August 2005 (UTC) Unmaintainable list: there can be thousands, or even tens of thousands of open source software packages. minghong 07:41, 24 July...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »WP:FENSWP:FENS This is a list of text-searchable, free to access (no-pay, non-subscription/-membership/-login) online English newspaper sources. As a rule, entries...
Click to read more »(glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! List of 18th – early 19th century sources on Souli and Souliotes (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a mirror of public domain or other primary source material. In Wikipedia articles, quotes of any original texts being discussed should...
Click to read more »independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines, and other guidelines on appropriate stand-alone lists. The entirety of the list does not need to be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's interface beyond the options available in preferences. This is a list of available scripts, with a description and a button to install them. User...
Click to read more »significance of coverage within a particular source. For example, many sports figures are routinely listed in match reports in passing in newspaper articles...
Click to read more »the <ref> tags as follows: <ref>{{cite book|author=...}}</ref> See full list of citation templates at Wikipedia:Citation templates. For other templates...
Click to read more »to search the talk page archives before starting a new topic. Most sources listed here cover the comics industry in general, but happen to come up often...
Click to read more »As its name implies, the To-do list on an article's talk page shows the list of improvements suggested for the article. It is created and formatted using...
Click to read more »page. The list was removed 03:03, 7 May 2008. This list uses only one source... The Forbes List. While Forbes is definitely a reliable source... no featured...
Click to read more »various streaming platforms and airplay tracked by Radiomonitor. List of news sources that can be used but be alert Biznews - Conservative orientation...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »the original source supported the material in the Wikipedia article. A comprehensive list of web archive sites can be found at Wikipedia:List of web archives...
Click to read more »academic papers using Wikipedia as a source, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia as an academic source, and the bibliography links listed at the bottom of this page. For...
Click to read more »The following is a list of article ideas that show up repeatedly in Articles for deletion (AfD). Please think twice before creating an article about any...
Click to read more »copyright laws. When uploading the image to Wikipedia or Commons, list all sources used on the file description page. Maps are used not only in geography...
Click to read more »comprehensive list of policies and guidelines. For a quick overview, see Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; for descriptive directories see Wikipedia:List of policies...
Click to read more »as a source like: List of top international men's football goal scorers by country, List of Lebanon international footballers, Benjamin Mendy, List of Republic...
Click to read more »page is to provide a list of links that can be used to research current events and news stories. It provides links to reliable sources for Wikipedia articles...
Click to read more »but useful source from the same clearing-house as above The Sports Network – another incomplete but useful source defunct Naturally, this list is not meant...
Click to read more »summarize source information contained elsewhere in the article, and is therefore not properly sourced. Geraldk 18:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC) De-list Comparing...
Click to read more »compile a list of the numbers of players in each boundary, that would be very helpful! – PeeJay 18:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC) Comments on sourcing Personally...
Click to read more »reliable source. This site gives all the info required, but for a vastly reduced subset of the names in this list. Therefore, I could support the list if restricted...
Click to read more »a reliable source can be found. Once each article undergoes reviews of each of the three above elements, a stable revision should be listed in the last...
Click to read more »a collection of sources and external links related to the club. This page is intended to serve as an easy to access list to sources related to Sheffield...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »and a source review support. I've made some changes to this list, to be more in line with List of chief ministers of Karnataka, a featured list. I think...
Click to read more »featured list removal because it uses marketing material, self-published sources (everything2.com, at least, not sure about some of the others) and sources that...
Click to read more »nomination) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Same as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Philadelphia...
Click to read more »specific citations), simply list Solie but I really think a redundant print source would be nice to at least keep listed in the article. Staxringold talkcontribs...
Click to read more »2008 and 2013 releases. General source only covers 2008 episodes, not anything past then. No attempt made to clean up list during FLRC. Dana boomer (talk)...
Click to read more »Earthh (talk) 19:05, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Support A fully detailed list and nicely sourced. Well done! Simon (talk) 13:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC) Comments...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list because... I feel it meets the criteria. This list was once an FL under the CZW World Heavyweight Championship. Bad sourcing and prose...
Click to read more »whether or not sources are needed and what exactly needs to be sourced whether or not geography features should be included on the list, with the alternative...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »is a list of all pages in the 'Infobox' pseudo-namespace, excluding subpages. Redirected and deleted templates should be removed from this list. Deprecated...
Click to read more »scope of a blacklist listing. If an unreliable source is blacklisted, the community doesn't lose as much as if a reliable source is blacklisted. The community...
Click to read more »clubs and/or on English web pages. These are the names that shd be used in List of dog breeds and as the name for breed articles, unless the group decides...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »the list, and have made a small correction. Rest seems fine to me, and I support this list for promotion as a Featured list. Any comments or a source review...
Click to read more »by the source. Other than that option, there is no reason to include the names in the list, that the source questions, just because that source decided...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »here. Gauging whether a source is reliable or not is often difficult in the area of films. The following is a list of sources that have been established...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »Constitution itself, plus another source). A list of 187 items should use Template:Compact TOC for ease of searching, as in List of municipalities in Arkansas...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »instances where there's no strong sources that support the change and MSW3/the IUCN don't support it. I put it in the first list mostly as a reader guide to...
Click to read more »(but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present. 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content...
Click to read more »intact, I'm no longer sure that the list meets FL standards. George Ho (talk) 22:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Sourcing for the lead is bad and I'm not sure...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »to list one source 383 times in the list 3rd Supreme People's Assembly? I would also add that adding for instance 9 refs in one column on the list 8th...
Click to read more »more reliable sources do you need above ESPNcricinfo? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC) I've done some tidying on this list now; mostly...
Click to read more »organised list. Arguably flawless. Well done! Simon (talk) 08:32, 2 May 2016 (UTC) Source review There is no logic to the order of the sources list: it should...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list because i think it's ready and contains all information that could be found, correctly sourced. Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS]...
Click to read more »notable entries in this list. No reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a directory. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC) List of breweries in Iowa...
Click to read more »This is a list of existing policies that can be used either to support a deletion proposal (prod) or nomination, or in an attempt to prevent deletion in...
Click to read more »Genera List", a classic outside Wikipedia means? Because what I see is someone's personal hobby site, and I'm confused how that's a reliable source; I see...
Click to read more »sources, or that section is simply removed, something needs to be done. Jamesx12345 (talk) 21:16, 25 June 2013 (UTC) It used to be a pretty good list...
Click to read more »(UTC) I agree, the article could use much better sourcing, not to mention it is a combination of a list and a regular article. Sure it uses good grammer...
Click to read more »indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »sources, but some journals have a reputation for bias or unreliability. QuackWatch has a list of non-recommended periodicals, however, a short list of...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list because it is a complete, sourced list of all songs by a notable musician, and provides a valuable source of information for anyone...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »to add a citation to every NOCs, as they were all come from a same source, so list at "general". And I also feel this filmography case have more excuse...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »you couldn't find sources for, can be listed in the talk page, so that other editors would look for sources as well and update the list accordingly.--Cheetah...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list because It is important in the lists of historical monuments and has sufficient and reliable sources POS78 (talk) 13:59, 1...
Click to read more »means that people can check that facts or claims correspond to reliable sources. Wikipedia's content is determined by published information rather than...
Click to read more »the basic (and unsourced) list in the biography, has been brought into line with MOS requirements, and is now fully sourced throughout. - SchroCat (talk)...
Click to read more »leaked onto the internet in September 2013" The list goes on. Its full of speculation, poorly sourced and possibly synthesised material, no navigational...
Click to read more »considered as one. If we look at the RSSSF source on January 2018, we can see that those championships are not listed. But by February 2018, during the time...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »spelled out. Table looks good, sorts well etc. Sources look legit to me too. @Miyagawa: - Overall a good list, very few issues jumped out at me. MPJ-US 02:00...
Click to read more »featured list because I have created the article, it is comprehensive in the history of Memphis head football coaches, and has a lead that is well-sourced. PCN02WPS...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »in over a decade. The sourcelist is comprised of the browser game's site and other host sites with no reliable secondary sources or evidence of actual...
Click to read more »the book appearing on the NYT Bestseller list. The list itself is a perfectly and self-evidently reliable source for the books that appear on it. Whether...
Click to read more »featured list because I have re-edited this list completely, as I added the infobox and uploaded pictures. I added all of the proper citations and sources, and...
Click to read more »am nominating this for featured list because i have been working on improving the article, its formatting, sourcing, prose etc and i believe that it...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »participants. If you wish, you can add your user name at the top of the list of participants below. To receive the Guild's regular newsletters and updates...
Click to read more »external source. part done - added to date listed, but not changed reference number "In addition to being Grade I listed Pontypridd" - Comma after listed "1791-95"...
Click to read more »Below is a list of documents that have cited Wikipedia as a source and are of general interest to Wikipedians, but don't fall into one of the other categories...
Click to read more »to that source? I agree that the intro could do with a couple more refs, but that's no reason to declassify a clearly notable and useful list Jimfbleak...
Click to read more »source – list of academic works citing Wikipedia as a source. Help:Find sources – a place that helps access reliable sources. Wikipedia:Book sources –...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »placed the {{primary sources}} tag and raised concerns about article quality on the talk page. I am nominating this for featured list removal because......
Click to read more »modified it, sourced it, illustrated it, hopefully it's close to featured. Thanks to the community as ever for time and effort spent reviewing the list. Cheers...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »coverage. We need multiple sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Not: passing mentions, directory listings, government records, or the...
Click to read more »18:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC) Support on sources Source review This FLC is listed at the FLC page as needing a source review so here goes: Ref 1 (The prize...
Click to read more »"www.lupinencyclopedia.com" would be considered a reliable source. Starts "This is a list..." which we don't do any more. En-dashes need to be used throughout...
Click to read more »other list. Please give me feedback to anything I've might have missed. --Threeohsix (talk) 12:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Comments (includes source review...
Click to read more »(but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present. 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content...
Click to read more »referenced in the subjects article, it will do no harm to add the source to this list as well. My objection stands. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 23:22, 16 February...
Click to read more »list because it has been written and formatted according to the precedent set by previous featured lists of American colleges and universities: List of...
Click to read more »would find it in reliable sources (for example other encyclopedias and reference works, scholarly journals, and major news sources). This makes it easy to...
Click to read more »link. Can another reliable source be found? In the Other Chart Songs section the collaboration with Elton John is listed as Non Album Song → removed...
Click to read more »they are secondary sources, I would prefer more primarly sources. Primary sources are preferable. From my experience in "Featured list candidates" in general...
Click to read more »(but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present. 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content...
Click to read more »blacklist/About Special:Log/spamblacklist MediaWiki:Bad image list Wikipedia:Deprecated sources Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored Wikipedia:Link rot/URL...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »that a list with much of its writing copied from a public domain source shouldn't be made featured. An article of similar closeness to a PD source would...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »appear in your list but not in the source. Furthermore, the source states that Queen Latifa was a presenter, but she is not included in your list. Finally,...
Click to read more »not published in a reliable source how can it be "major"? Only in regards to Wikipedia of course. The criteria for the list are 1: Person has a Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Support. Fourth list Formula One nomination's post Driver's, Driver's Champions and Contructor's Champions. Another Formula One list clearly and concise...
Click to read more »for featured list because I believe it meets the FL criteria. I've made sure that only the most reliable sources are used in this list, and it is modeled...
Click to read more »this list is overall well done, and I'm quite impressed with your work on it. However, there are several source issues remained. Some sources are not...
Click to read more »the correctness and comprehensiveness of the list. Due to technical problems about 200 additional source (individual entries in the UGC deemed university...
Click to read more »the use of the BCG as a reliable source, I should first point out that I have used it in other featured lists (see List of Peep Show episodes) and they...
Click to read more »changes in the model of my recent List of counties in Washington FL, including updating populations, replacing the sources you noted with a better one for...
Click to read more »refs could be centred. For book sources, maintain consistency in dates. Some only have a year. Also they should be listed in alphabetical order of the author's...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »second National Film Award nomination. I feel its a well written and well sourced list worthy of promotion. As always, all the constructive comments and feedbacks...
Click to read more »informative list. Thanks! ~ HAL333 04:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC) Support — But consider archiving sources (WP:PLRT)...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »the present article, a simple list of the current governors of Indian states. It is well written and impeccably sourced; any concerns will be taken care...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »with the single. Other charted songs are not sourced. Candyo32 04:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC) Support de-listing speedy removal, discogs are supposed be exemplory...
Click to read more »This is a list of flaws of WP:RS, written by User:Phil Sandifer. As requested, an inventory of the flaws in this page. I hope you will see that the flaws...
Click to read more »satisfactory explanation, and if possible a source which seems to support this. The fact that they're not listed is an indication, but I've seen nothing which...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk...
Click to read more »Delist - So much sourcing issues this page has. Shame since its an interesting list. GamerPro64 01:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Delist - Sourcing issues as well...
Click to read more »of what is the score column. You could add to the goals list the cap number, using this source. Why is a goals-per-year table nested under a section titled...
Click to read more »information from AniList may be marginally more reliable than what is often found on MyAnimeList. Nonetheless, AniList is still a tertiary source, and cannot...
Click to read more »the word "pioneer" should be sourced The † and ‡ notes should be sourced The list itself is hardly sourced. Is it sourced by an "external link"? It should...
Click to read more »Speedy delist per nominator. I was the one who redirected the list as a result of lack of sources that confirm the seasons' organizations.Tintor2 (talk) 01:14...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »Mattel would be a bad source when the material at hand is about types of careers Barbie has been portrayed as having (I do think "List of careers Barbie has...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »criteria/threshold for the shorter set of entries that are listed. Perhaps some commodities source could indicate the top beans by sale volume, for example...
Click to read more »observe that in List of Grade I listed buildings in Greater Manchester the entries from English Heritage are all listed seperately. Another source of serious...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »in the table. The rest of the buildings in the list are not ranked in North Carolina in their sources, though, so I will add this link to the general...
Click to read more »(but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present. 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content...
Click to read more »(but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present. 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content...
Click to read more »for the main list, I have reformatted the list, and have added various sources for all the vice presidents. If the structure and sourcing appears fine...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »no, unless the source already uses a compatible license (such as CC BY-SA), or you donate the source. A free license makes the source available for anyone...
Click to read more »source which was used for the building of the list. Individual entries, especially the dates of change and reasons given for changing, were sourced from...
Click to read more »the list. I believe this list now meets all six featured list criteria. I have used Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences as the primary source for...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »Inclusion in lists contained within articles should be determined by WP:SOURCELIST, in that the entries must have the same importance to the subject as would...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »excludes articles from FL for sourcing reasons? Cheers, Pokerplayer513 (talk) 02:53, 8 March 2019 (UTC) The featured list criteria state that all FLs must...
Click to read more »box per MOS, and there are several sources of questionable provenance, as well as some deadlinks. Shockingly, this list is also tagged as being "incomplete"...
Click to read more »text-source integrity, although I suppose the footnotes on distribution do provide this One reviewer sort of brought that up for the previous list (but...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »resolved/clarified; list meets WP:WIAFL.--Truco 503 15:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Sources look good...
Click to read more »could be candidates for removal (see List of Carolina Panthers first-round draft picks, which has similar sourcing issues). I have recently done work on...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »that whole list is sourced with ESPNcricinfo match reports. No credible source discusses it as a set or group which is required so this list, in fact,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard which has a search box for a complete listing of your topic discussed there. Therefore this list is better for use...
Click to read more »this list's formatting, but there are some major gaps in sourcing, and it does not appear to cover all awards the show received. Therefore, the list currently...
Click to read more »was no source listed on the column. Great work on the list! DanielleTH (Say hi!) 15:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC) It's been two weeks since a source review,...
Click to read more »end to source the list, the current standard is that citations should be placed in the body of the article. If a source is used for the entire list, it can...
Click to read more »page. The list was not promoted 05:45, 31 January 2008. I am renominating this article because I have updated the links and I have sourced more of the...
Click to read more »doubts about the reliability of the site. The only option now is to source the list individually, from the f1 website and some books that I have. There...
Click to read more »as that in the list already, there's no need do so. Unrelated to above, I should point out that this is most likely not a reliable source. Again, thanks...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list because it is comprehensive with sources for each individual entry in addition to general sources, explains the relationship...
Click to read more »"haunting" still needs a source (directly after the statement would be ideal). As for proposed, I did check the other list of tallest building pages...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) I am nominating this for featured list because the list contains a well sourced and informative list of international cricket centuries by Steve...
Click to read more »at the moment. Harrias talk 08:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Delist A poorly-sourced list. HĐ (talk) 10:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Closing note: Delisting this article;...
Click to read more »subpages listed a total of 730 mirrors and forks of Wikipedia. Using these mirrors and forks on Wikipedia Copies of Wikipedia are not reliable sources and...
Click to read more »became famous. To me, a list should be a single source that branches off to other sources of information, as opposed to a single source that includes as much...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »as usual, but as a short list that's part of a series, I think it's fine to promote without waiting another few weeks. Source review passed, promoting...
Click to read more »was discussed in secondary sources, but notability wasn't necessarily demonstrated. I feel as if the issues at this list echo the ones at 300 stolen...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »incomplete and some entries are lacking sources. Players who have not played in a fully professional league listed below may meet Wikipedia's General notability...
Click to read more »better source for this number. Mattximus (talk) 19:00, 28 August 2017 (UTC) It's impossible to do source the number of buildings in the lead in any "List of...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »champion list, JennyOz (talk) 11:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC) PresN this looks good to go...? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Source review...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »relatively well-sourced. Sourcing is an even bigger problem for categories, because you can't just source one list, but must source every article in...
Click to read more »are many dead links, so it is difficult to assess what the sources are saying. This list may have benefited from a current peer review to address this...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »Still a Featured List Remove. This list gives provisional figures of population of districts from the Census 2001. Either update it with final tally available...
Click to read more »increasingly-obscure sci-fi/fantasy award lists. This time around we have a list where the wiki source text is longer than all of the winners combined: the Dwarf Stars...
Click to read more »inclusion criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating...
Click to read more »helpful IP user while I was in the midst of rewriting the list. I do not know what the source is exactly, since the title of the article is not given....
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »simply "List of Valkyries" (keeping current name as redirect)? The current list is both a list of name meanings and list of orignal sources, so if there...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »navigation between seasons, references its episode list sources by seasons and is simply a very complete list. Michaelas10 (T|C) 12:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list removal because: None of the sources show any of the stats listed, which include games, goals, records etc. Stats for players...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »from? Playing positions. Again, where are these sourced from? Redlinks. About a third of the players listed are redlinks, which IMO is rather more than "a...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »not in WB 2013 list etc. Others...!? (65) Syria is not anywhere in that source. The WB13 source goes Namibia then Mauritius. The list has "Guernsey +...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »following link displays subpages of this page: Special:PrefixIndex Pages listed are source reliability landing pages, part of a demo of one approach to dealing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Citing sources. Starting the lead "This is a list... " is deprecated. See other current featured lists for professional ways to introduce the list. The...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »scope of the list. 4) That it is easy navigated. 5a) Does not have visual appeal. I do agree that it is 3) Comprehensive (but needs more sourcing) 5b) Has...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »18:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC) I am nominating this for featured list because it is a well-sourced list on a church of controversy, and notability. Me-123567-Me...
Click to read more »per above) A fine, well-sourced list.—indopug (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Support. Well-written and well-sourced list, it meets the criteria.--Carioca...
Click to read more »population size, and just by viewing the list alone will familiarize yourself with a lot of the names. The data is all sourced to latest census figures and I believe...
Click to read more »from having to re-litigate those sources over and over. The list is not exclusive, and a source does not need to be listed to be considered EITHER reliable...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »sources that list more? I'd be more than happy to include them if so. I'll do some more searching to see if I can find any more that reliable sources...
Click to read more »Filmography of actor Ajay Devgan. Here is the complete list of films done in his career. with enough sources and context. D'SuperHero (talk) 12:52, 1 December...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list removal because it's another 2008 list that doesn't meet current standards. Major issues with sourcing as many of the awards...
Click to read more »criteria for a featured list. This list is thoroughly sourced and cited and meets all content and style requirements for a featured list similar in quality...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »Playlists listed (perhaps the thing most comparable to an album, for a YouTuber). That way it can be condensed, and still reliably sourced. This can be...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »source. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is...
Click to read more »I went through this list and feels that it meets the criteria. Warhol13 21:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Support Very nice. :-) My only concern is the large gap...
Click to read more »citing sources or exactly defining criteria for inclusion, the list basically fails WP:NPOV. If there were some sort of source which also listed basic...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! List of sources for John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »editor, publisher etc as part of the list? ;Sources Is the "Science Fiction Awards Database" a Reliable source?? That's all the issues I have seen, overall...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »promotion as it has a source review and comments. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Thanks. I'll do a review of the list in due course. The Rambling...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »source this page when it got it's 'Featured List' status, [3], link to 'List of' at the time it was given 'Featured List' status. It is the only list...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »these roads and sites on them? Or just listings in tourism guides? "the most national byways of any state." Source?? Looking at the maps on the three program...
Click to read more »I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria. Sources have been added to the list, and the tables have been formatted...
Click to read more »blends in elements from the list and the history. The list does have sources, so once the entries that are only sourced to reliable or insigificant coverage...
Click to read more »list itself was not compiled from any one source. Like I said in the nomination, during all of the research that I did in order to compose the list,...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »dynamic list must have inline citations for each entry. It just isn't maintainable or easily verifiable without them. For each you need a source that confirms...
Click to read more »having them before the contents? There is also a list of external links in addition to the hard copy source. - RachelBrown 12:42, 2 November 2005 (UTC) I'm...
Click to read more »part on the MBFC listings. What we can't do is add text to articles based on that listing. We can't add, "MBFC rates CNN as an X source". Springee (talk)...
Click to read more »a generally reliable source, and an influential one according to its SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), available at its SJR page. List of people (academics...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »which I found out about while starting to work on the Gloucs list (EN's website, our source, has it in the wrong AoS). Because each map is given a specific...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »North and the main Whig candidate in the South are listed in the table below. – why those two? The source emphasized that they were two major candidates of...
Click to read more »emphasizes that this list relies too much on a single second-party source. If this list would be instead expanded along the lines of List of non-marine molluscs...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »This is a log of featured lists from Wikipedia:Featured list candidates, with the most recent at the top. Discussions about unsuccessful nominations are...
Click to read more »reliabls source? This list definitely needs to include {{Dynamic list}}. Avoid bolding the name of the list in the lead when the name of the list is a phrase...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »1/201712/1/2023Featured ListsFeatured ArticlesFeatured List and Featured Article counts Source data Percent of articlesDate00.020.040.060.080.10...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »book source and many "refs" are just urls. It clearly no longer deserves the star. – zmbro (talk) 02:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC) Remove. This list has slipped...
Click to read more »generals in the history of the United States Army are listed, with birth and death year, source of commision, date of promotion to 4 star rank, assignments...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »book source, they didn't seem that accurate? And I can't make heads or tails out of the individual articles. I wasn't sure if the episode list template...
Click to read more »13:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC) This list lacks sources. Something needs fixing, either the list itself or the source requirement (item 1c) as it pertains...
Click to read more »the Chicago BBWAA (from the Vaas source article). However those awards are NOT listed on the official MLB website list, so I have not included them (since...
Click to read more »Useful list, carefully annotated with lots of references. I'll leave it to the subject area experts to comment on how comprehensive it is. --MarkSweep (call...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk...
Click to read more »articles about international football. I think it's sourced enough for it to be considered for featured list. —Chrisportelli (talk) 13:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »same source, normally we shorten all of those citations, and list the full citation in list below the footnotes. Some style guides for print sources (Chicago)...
Click to read more »articles as your source. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 13:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Sorry, let me be more clear. I didn't want to clutter up the List of vegetable oils...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »anyone with greater familiarity with the subject or the list. Do you have access to the sources, in fact? BencherliteTalk 22:27, 26 September 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »support, 0 oppose. Promote. Juhachi 11:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC) The list is well sourced and is modelled after the lists of WWE and Intercontinental champions...
Click to read more »note Done Final (but most important of all) note - the source for the entire table is listed as the 2005 edition of the Book of British Hit Singles,...
Click to read more »unreferenced. This comes from the same source as the junior ministers list. It simply highlighted who was in the cabinet in the list, which makes life easier for...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »actors until that source I described is released. That makes sense. I'm fine with leaving it; I can see by the history that this list is actively updated...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list because it is a massive, comprehensive, well-written, fully-sourced and up-to-date list of all the original, high-end...
Click to read more »fact-checking process. How can the list be reliable if the source is not reliable? I don't think that this should be a featured list.==Mouse Pad of Doom 17:35...
Click to read more »links and I support keeping the list as featured. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Looks like the sources can be fixed. Example, here is...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »in the source used for the list; or (b) modify and extend the name for consistent presentation within our list. I favour the former when a source is consistent...
Click to read more »from reliable sources). So while you can piece together a list through various refs, there is no definitive source that proves the list is 100% complete...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment AdjustShift, list all of the entries that you have a problem with, and I'll find full rationales (and sources for them). -- Scorpion0422...
Click to read more »resolved/clarified; list meets WP:WIAFL.--Truco 503 15:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC) Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC) Sources look good...
Click to read more »all sources are created equal refers to the belief that two contradicting sources should not always be given equal weight on an article or list. If reasonable...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list because I believe have the article fulfilled the FL Criteria. Every Century is sourced. Good looking lead Price Zero|talk...
Click to read more »difficult to source. (Guyinblack25 talk 15:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)) I usually read media lists as for listing only notable media, not fringe sources and strategy...
Click to read more »(UTC) I am nominating this for featured list because this is a short but comprehensive and well-sourced list. HĐ (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Support...
Click to read more »@Pamzeis: can you please finish this source review. I think it would be cool if this could be the Featured List on the main page on May 4th (for May the...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the every single criteria. Also, I believe it to be well sourced and clear. After much tweaking...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »about this list, but I think that demotion is no longer necessary at this time. Goodraise 07:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC) Hmm, I'll check the sourcing and stuff...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »wrestling sources do not fall in the Reliable source category while all the printed sources do, I've not yet found many reliable online sources that list title...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »This list is modeled cloesly after two successful Mexican municipality nominations Colima and Aguascalientes, keeping similar format and sourcing. I believe...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »this list—it’s really well-formatted and pretty judiciously sourced. The sole comments I have right now are about the Twitter and YouTube sources—so that's...
Click to read more »19 February 2021 (UTC) I am nominating this for featured list because it is well-sourced and organized. I've used other FL discographies; like Meghan...
Click to read more »The Rambling Man (talk) 06:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC) Source review passed. As a note- the ESPY list series seems to be inconsistent in whether it titles...
Click to read more »would be better for navigation. Again, not a necessity, the list is great and well sourced :) LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC) Hi Lady, It's...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »proposal, please list it here. The RFC During the FAC for Hopkins School, the issue of the use of unpublished archival materials as sources on Wikipedia came...
Click to read more »additions have been made. On the surface the listing may still look polished but when you check the cited sources more closely that are meant to support the...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comments The list is overcrowded with Images, get rid of the three below the infobox. IMDB is not considered a reliable source. Delink United States...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources. In theory, primary sources may also be used. Reliance on primary sources can lead to...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »these affect rather the article should exist, but the list is also in terrible shape (only 1 source, no info on the actual events, etc.) TJ Spyke 19:19...
Click to read more »of interest. A list of some sources of professional reviews is available at WP:ALBUM/SOURCES. Lists can be considered as another source of reviews as to...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk...
Click to read more »wonder if, instead of de-listing, cleaning up and sourcing, then re-listing - maybe we can just skip all that? Clean it up and source it? Same with the other...
Click to read more »Nergaal, non-worrysome issues. This list seems to be in good condition and the lead seems to cover everything, well-sourced and all. Gloss • talk 02:25, 7...
Click to read more »in reliable sources. NorthAmerica1000 22:11, 18 April 2014 (UTC) The list makes no point of defining why a toothpaste would make the list, and why it...
Click to read more »table of documents used in legal proceedings that have cited Wikipedia as a source. This may also include important regulatory or administrative government...
Click to read more »second, because the vast majority of sources sort Le Guin's works as I had done in the non-table version of this list; as in, first by series/setting, then...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »todo list and on the WP:FG things you can do, thanks for the review.--Pedro J. the rookie 00:40, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Comments A few sourcing issues:...
Click to read more »And it's a direct rip-off of the source, but HEY that's kind of what a list is, isn't it? Whenever we make a "list of what's happening in the world"...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »list should include more secondary sources for the descriptions of the fugitives, rather than relying on a primary source such as the FBI. The list seems...
Click to read more »this for featured list because I feel the list meets the criteria and provides a sourced and well-written listing of it's award list. All kind of comments...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »personal experience, it can be really annoying to have to re-source a featured article or list years down the road because of dead links. I changed the alt...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »:)-- KRIMUK90 ✉ 03:40, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Support. Excellent and well-sourced list. --Carioca (talk) 19:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC) Support Nice work as usual...
Click to read more »example the rationales on List of South Park episodes. Also if you scanned the covers or took the pictures then you are the source yourself, and that fact...
Click to read more »written, well sourced and has neutral point of view. However, i encountered a few minor issues in this particular list which i am listing below and i expect...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »reason of showing different sources and opinions. Llull 14:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Prune/merge as per Resolute. The List of wars series gives an example...
Click to read more »the co-ords in the map source If you want the Open Street map to work, you would have to include the coords in the table. See List of plantations in North...
Click to read more »stand-alone list only if there are reliable sources dealing with the list as a topic, as with Baird's Manual of American College Fraternities supporting List of...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »well sourced list. Ruslik_Zero 19:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC) Support. All issues resolved. Parutakupiu (talk) Comment If you would like to move the list to...
Click to read more »The choice is a list of six models for 1999 or the list of 21 that resulted from this edit based on the source in question. The list is believably reliable...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »(UTC) I believe the sources are inadequate and that this list no longer means FL standards. Source 1 is outdated and the source for the airdates is linked...
Click to read more »(UTC) List of nicknames of pro wrestlers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) (Find sources: Google...
Click to read more »page. Follow the technical instructions at the bottom of the list (hidden in article source, you will need to be in edit mode to see) Optional: Sign your...
Click to read more »to break the UK Top 40" – break into? The list Capitalisation: pray examine your conscience and your sources: What Difference Does It Make? How Soon Is...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »(UTC) Tables/listed content/sources check out fine.--TRUCO 15:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Support - problems fixed to meet the Featured list criteria.--TRUCO...
Click to read more »are "most important"? No source is listed for that determination and the only source doesn't make any determination of its listed composers by style (and...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »source for this and then put it in the list. Delete the list from Flag of Norway. Otherwise the existence of a separate page for the very same list may...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »every released title on the list. MuZemike (talk) 20:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC) Question — the only source for the list of cancelled games are on Planet...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »Padukone's biography to featured status, I am nominating a fully-sourced and well-written listing of her film and music video appearances. As usual, look forward...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »reliable sources". What evidence is there that anyone cares who is number one on the Social 50? That's what is keeping this from being a featured list in my...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »Dabomb87 (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC) Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC) Support Excellent list! Very informative lead and a great...
Click to read more »Latvia, Poland and Hungary" - need a source for it reaching number 1 in those countries given that they aren't listed in the table That's it for now.......
Click to read more »Below is a small list of academic conference papers citing Wikipedia as a source. Tunsch, Thomas: Museum Documentation and Wikipedia.de: Possibilities...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:LCIWP:LCI This is a list of Wikipedia articles deemed controversial because they are constantly re-edited in a circular manner, or are otherwise...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »The source for this is CCM, where you can see the note "* = de-listed player" at the bottom. Yes, you are correct in interpreting that players listed "-2007"...
Click to read more »nominating this for featured list because over the past couple of months I have done alot of work on improving sourcing, formatting, content etc for the...
Click to read more »(UTC) I am nominating this for featured list because the article has clear inclusion criterias, is well-sourced, and was modelled after other similar football...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »not blogs. And the reason why Been Waiting director isnt listed because I couldn't find a source of who directed the video but I will still keep on looking...
Click to read more »Municipalities of Colima, as a template for this list, keeping similar format and sourcing. I believe it meets featured list requirements but I am very open to any...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »a list of episodes for an animated television series. It is complete in content, with concise episodes summaries. All material is properly-sourced. Second...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »for the episode list source, see List of Stargate SG-1 episodes. Section introductions or graphs. Maybe a spoiler-free version of the list. Michaelas10 (Talk)...
Click to read more »information about the hall, and all information in the table is sourced to reliable references. This list mirrors the format of other Featured Lists, such as NWA...
Click to read more »On what basis is this judgement made? This "list" needs a complete reconception and much better sources to be "featured".Musikfabrik 22:09, 14 August...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »When the blog posting provides a simple list of tourist attractions in a given area, it is a tertiary source for its subject matter. The relationship...
Click to read more »Jackets list, it has a very small lead, and a very small amount of references (which are listed in a bad format). The lead needs expansion and sources, the...
Click to read more »what is in the source, because there are so many different ways of counting and listing Georgia governors that once I found the source, which is the closest...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »comments, but as far as I can see this list is an excellent candidate that deserves FL status. Great sourcing, can't really ask for more information on...
Click to read more »featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates...
Click to read more »