Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means that people can check that facts or claims correspond to reliable sources. Wikipedia's content is determined...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Reflexive Human...
Click to read more »found one non-selfpublished source. Doesn't appear to be notable. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:15, 4 January 2019 (UTC) How many non-selfpublished sources does...
Click to read more »Article was written by one of the newspapers staff. [1]. Fails WP:SELFPUBLISHed and WP:GNG. Ben Ben (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Delete No evidence...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Goldilocks Mission...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, ad for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Guardmount (edit |...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, ad for selfpublished book (Lulu.com). NawlinWiki (talk) 02:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Sole...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete a7, selfpublished book, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 18:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Prophet" "Pete Macias". -Elmer Clark 05:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC) Delete, selfpublished book. NawlinWiki 13:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC) Delete — per all above...
Click to read more »page. The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising for unfinished, selfpublished book series, article written by (of course) books' author-to-be. NawlinWiki...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, ad for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC) The Vril Codex...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) nn, selfpublished (follow the publisher link), notability tagged for two years Kintetsubuffalo...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11 (ad for selfpublished book), a7 (author nonnotable), WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:29, 28...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete a7, selfpublished book, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 18:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WP:GNG, a gsearch brings up nothing useable, it appears to have been selfpublished and released just a few days ago, so this article is probably here for...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, part of advertising for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC) All African Alliance...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No sources except selfpublished that this is notable Finn Rindahl (talk) 23:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »notability, either in article or on Amazon page, which shows it as a selfpublished book with negligible sales. -Nat Gertler (talk) 00:38, 16 April 2013...
Click to read more »notable but this seems highly promotional. Sources are numerous but selfpublished or press releases. Editor may have COI. Triwbe (talk) 21:54, 3 June...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Selfpublished author and anti-child abuse advocate; doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO...
Click to read more »Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Delete, non-notable...
Click to read more »on coola this book contains a stamp list (oh, crap!), no, wait, its selfpublished (whew!!:)). Coolabahapple (talk) Delete - How can we verify, no RS available...
Click to read more »source is on a statement near the bottom of the article. Said source is selfpublished. There are no other sources showing the notability of the person. –...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete a7, author of a selfpublished book, which is not an assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:42...
Click to read more »sources I find about this individual, but not by this individual, are WP:SELFPUBLISHED or otherwise unreliable. Z. Patterson (talk) 04:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11 as advertising for selfpublished book (note that book does not appear on Amazon or Google Books search)...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) insignificant secondary coverage, all selfpublished, neologism, dubious notability Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:22, 21 July...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unverified, not notable--selfpublished books by a non-notable author. Really, DB-A9 should apply to books as...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nonnotable selfpublished poet. Only references are to blogs, book selling websites, and mirrors...
Click to read more »Non-notable. Renee (talk) 14:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »assertion of notability) and g11 (using Wikipedia to advertise her selfpublished book). NawlinWiki 02:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Chelsea DeVries (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »all the pages on specific books), advertising for article creator's selfpublished books. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC) The Xenton Chronicles...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Selfpublished children's book, does not appear notable. Sources are all apparently...
Click to read more »Google search and moved it here. Nonnotable children's book, seems to be selfpublished, available only at bookstores in the US South, 226 unique Ghits NawlinWiki...
Click to read more »source feel free to correct the tags to {{refimproveBLP}} and either {{Selfpublished}} or {{Primary Sources}} as appropriate. Or better still add wp:reliable...
Click to read more »asserted. Clubmarx (talk) 16:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC) Delete nonnotable selfpublished (if published at all) book. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:44, 23 August 2009...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, promotion for selfpublished or nonpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »indication of notability (I can read Dutch). "The doctor is in" was selfpublished according to (in English) medialab (scroll down in the "details" iframe)...
Click to read more »nonnotable "national expert" (in branding and marketing.) His "book" is a selfpublished e-book described on the page as "available free" for downloading.E.M...
Click to read more »currently uses self-published sources. We can delete this unless new non-selfpublished sources come to light. --sunstar nettalk 16:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC) Merge...
Click to read more »creator. An eBook that does not meet WP:NBOOK criteria, appears WP:SELFPUBLISHED, and article is somewhat promotional in tone with no references to reliable...
Click to read more »standards. A google search turns up some social networking, and other selfpublished stuff, but not much in the way of in-depth coverage. Also nominating...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, references provided do not work or are selfpublished and do not meet WP:RS --Eng. M.Bandara-Talk 00:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability (being a selfpublished author is not such an assertion). NawlinWiki (talk) 15:50, 10 January...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, ad for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Brooding (Heartland...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) nn selfpublished album, no independent coverage Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:56, 3 March...
Click to read more »ER 06:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Delete nonnotable author of nonnotable selfpublished book. NawlinWiki 14:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Delete nonnotable and spam...
Click to read more »reliable either. Grsz11 16:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author ("Exposure Publishing" is a selfpublish imprint). NawlinWiki...
Click to read more »— LinguistAtLarge • Talk 14:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Delete The information...
Click to read more »WP:MUSICBIO. This is probably the only WP:RS used, but the rest are WP:SELFPUBLISHed. Not enough sources to meet GNG or MUSICBIO. Also, why does an article...
Click to read more »believe this person fails WP:ARTIST. Written like an advert with a selfpublished link. Maybe re-create article when he is more established? Gbawden (talk)...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was Speedy delete, WP:SNOW, unpublished or selfpublished work, no references. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC) CrElyan...
Click to read more »14 May 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom. Article is entirely sourced to WP:SELFPUBLISHED WP:PRIMARY sources, and it doesn't look like there's anything better...
Click to read more »WP:BIO. --andrewI20Talk 06:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author. NawlinWiki 21:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Keep, one of the most...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Based largely on WP:SELFPUBLISHED sources such as blogs and social media. Fails WP:SIGCOV. A suitable...
Click to read more »Despite all the citations, he's essentially the nonnotable author of a selfpublished (Booksurge) book. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »unlikely to be RS: bjjheroes.com/about clealy self-identifies as a WP:SELFPUBLISHed fan site. jiujitsutimes.com says they have an ABOUT US page, but it...
Click to read more »guess it should be kept, but if not delete since sources now are all selfpublished. SefBau : msg 06:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Essentially all these publications are selfpublished. The reviews seems to be routine noticex in Whats On and the like. DGG...
Click to read more »existing ideas of Vertical farming. Most sources in the article are selfpublished, either directly (the company website) or indirectly (mynewsdesk.com...
Click to read more »library holdings on Worldcat - adesh katariya, books appear to all be selfpublished/print on demand, not necessarily a problem in itself, but have been...
Click to read more »Wikipedia for any length of time and an article cannot be based only on selfpublished sources. Guest9999 (talk) 02:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC) ?Delete maybe...
Click to read more »article, let them. This is not a WP article. All his books appear be selfpublished btw, looking at an Amazon author search. He does seem to exist, per...
Click to read more »Wiley's page has one reference from a reliable source that is not selfpublished or Resume like. This one reference does not establish notability. Spent...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Keep - Though the article about the newspaper article has selfpublished sources but it should be kept the reason is the newspaper is regional...
Click to read more »mention of the show on Kent Online. The current sources are all WP:SELFPUBLISHED or not independent of the subject. In an attempt to pursue WP:ATD I...
Click to read more »relatively new theory and is still in research." External links are to selfpublished sources, or sites that don't mention line theory or Shukla. Nishant...
Click to read more »The worst thing about the article is that the references are all WP:SELFPUBlished. Since the band is notable, I'm assuming this can be cleaned up with...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Selfpublished author of dubious notability, does clearly not pass WP:AUTHOR. Any real...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Only press, or routine or selfpublished sources can be found. No really good reliable sourcing. Jazzbanditto...
Click to read more »sign of notability found. His "famous quote" has 3 Google hits, all selfpublished by him. PrimeHunter 02:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Delete although he...
Click to read more »School Band Directors. Alfred Music. pp. 7–. ISBN 978-1-4574-6101-9. is selfpublished, so it won't count, but Sondra Wieland Howe (7 November 2013). Women...
Click to read more »improving though. Ravage Metal (talk) 06:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC) WP:SELFPUBLISHED - those are her own words about herself Geschichte (talk) 09:19, 11...
Click to read more »UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished book, local news coverage isn't very significant. NawlinWiki (talk)...
Click to read more »label, all current and former members are redlinked, sources are either selfpublished or not WP:RS. Terrillja talk 18:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC) Weak delete...
Click to read more »appear to meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG. Presented sources are mostly WP:SELFPUBLISHED. Google searches yield nothing substantial. Hitro talk 10:11, 5 December...
Click to read more »Curbed (itself a real estate blog). Other sources are themselves WP:SELFPUBLISHED blogs or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS of the subject. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:13...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Notability (numbers), WP:MADEUP. Only reference is to a preprint selfpublished (see [1]) by Heitor Baldo four days before article was created by User:Heitorb...
Click to read more »to be Hank Harrison has editwarred to insert information regarding a selfpublished polygraphh test result into his biography[1][2], the biography of Harrison...
Click to read more »at all, and the Kickstarter source is unacceptable because it's WP:SELFPUBLISHED. The film doesn't seem to have received significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »adding Reliable sources. All references are from networking sites and selfpublished source. SefBau : msg 08:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »mention at Limavady reserve team (few players mentioned). There is a selfpublished claim at [2]. No reliable source and non-notable. PrimeHunter 15:51...
Click to read more »even mention the subject of the article at all. The only ref is WP:SELFPUBLISHED. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:27, 3 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Per nom and WP:BK at 2.1.2 JodyB 12:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Selfpublished book, no indication of notability. NawlinWiki 14:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »line or its affiliates and therefore lack independence. One is a WP:SELFPUBLISHED tourism website that is not reliable. Only the Time Out articles is...
Click to read more »could be counted as such. Fanzines seem to largely fall into the WP:SELFPUBLISHED category of non-reliable sources. Case in point, Abyss was published...
Click to read more »(talk/contribs) 20:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable and likely selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Not Notable...
Click to read more »director and chief curator, as far as I can see. Music label is also selfpublished. Linked websites are mostly his websites. Wikigrund (talk) 13:35, 4...
Click to read more »23:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC) how is mandband-arhicve.com reliable? its a selfpublished source.68.151.25.115 (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »truncated, not advertising, but sourced only from the subject's webpage. Selfpublished sources can be used, but not as the basis for the article. I searched...
Click to read more »appointment and his publications are in fringe areas of linguistics and most selfpublished. The three reviews supplied as sources are unfavorable (one calls his...
Click to read more »usually create articles about an address of a mayor. Other refs are WP:SELFPUBLISHED sources. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:26, 3 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »09:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC) Seems you're right. Most references are selfpublished. I suggest for deletion. SefBau : msg 13:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »The Gateway Press book The Maxeys of Virginia is indeed both (a) WP:SELFPUBLISHED ("Published for the author by Gateway Press Inc." says the copyright...
Click to read more »the source) in reliable and non-reliable sources. The subject is now "selfpublished", but I am not sure if the subject is notable enough as a writer to...
Click to read more »same but no WP:GNG-qualifying sources. Meanwhile, his books are WP:SELFPUBLISHED (Palmetto Publishing, CreateSpace, others, and his sole academic paper...
Click to read more »17:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC) Comment, nom is incorrect about book being selfpublished, lark is an imprint of Sterling Publishing which in turn is part of...
Click to read more »Indian Private company filled with Press releases/announcements or selfpublished resources, WP:MILL. Lack of significant coverage with in-depth information...
Click to read more »book from History Press is in 4 libraries total on worldcat. this + a selfpublished book about what a local society, with references only to local papers...
Click to read more »find substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Mentions in selfpublished books notwithstanding. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Browserbased game with no assertion of notability. Relies entirely on selfpublished sources. The article lacks coverage by multiple reliable sources independent...
Click to read more »editors remain unconvinced. Because the news clippings are hosted on a SELFPUBLISHed site as images, personally I think that at least some of them could...
Click to read more »There's significant coverage here, but it's a blog and appears to be WP:SELFPUBLISHED. I also reviewed the discussion in the no-consensus 2006 and 2007 AfDs...
Click to read more »20:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Delete: Six of the nine references are WP:SELFPUBLISHED. The Grahasanket Magazine sources do not look reliable, and in any case...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sources are either unreliable/selfpublished, not enough for notability, or only mention Wayne Dupree in passing...
Click to read more »15:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC) I'm confused by this reasoning. There are selfpublished albums, aren't there? And aren't albums defined by the number of songs...
Click to read more »187.66.162 (talk) 14:23, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Entsweb.co.uk is a WP:SELFPUBLISHed site, and is therefore not a WP:Reliable source. Invitrovanitas (talk)...
Click to read more »Delete: Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:RS. The article is primarily based on selfpublished sources. deadwikipedian (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Delete too...
Click to read more »{{BLPunsourced}} {{BLP sources}} Other tags: {{BLP primary sources}} {{BLP selfpublished}} {{BLP sources section}} {{BLP unsourced section}} Wikipedia Gender...
Click to read more »either. Michitaro (talk) 11:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC) Seeing as it is a selfpublished book and a failed crowdfunded project it is possible that it won't be...
Click to read more »removed because the information has also some other sources. I used the selfpublished sources so that they do not support any controversial information. Only...
Click to read more »the DOS article, though there may not be any as all the sources are selfpublished. . dave souza,duplicate !vote removed by Jerry talk 18:03, 13 September...
Click to read more »journals (albeit of notable organizations) and even his bio-ref is selfpublished and cites or clone this here WP article. The other claim is a book with...
Click to read more »question, we have the germ of an good article here- examining their selfpublished material and comparing that with properly WP:RS article it looks as...
Click to read more »format as the other references, adding yet another in a set of itunes selfpublished e-books written by the subject of the article, and updating all of the...
Click to read more »(webzine). chicagostagereview.com is a self published websites, but per WP:SELFPUBLISHED which states "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) I don't know of any notability criteria regarding number of selfpublished books in libraries, and if there were I really don't think 74 would...
Click to read more »non notable author. The book claimed to be a best seller is actually selfpublished, and has a total of 6 copies in worldcat libraries. The scientific publications...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This looks like promotional information for series of the selfpublished books. All references lead to the self published materials. Arthistorian1977...
Click to read more »of course, hosts companies' press releases on the web and, per wp:SELFPUBLISHED, companies' press releases are considered reliable about such indiv...
Click to read more »sources -- WP:BIO talks about "independent sources" in several contexts. Selfpublished sources are not considered independent from the subject, and claims...
Click to read more »and linux-magazin.de) mention only Arcavias. The rest are all either selfpublished or indiscriminate software listings. There is also a set of links under...
Click to read more »about the rest, even if probably a couple of the other websites are not selfpublished/blog sites. In my opinion it is not so few coverage, considering metalcore...
Click to read more »weighted very much for any subject GitHub profile, could be used per WP:SELFPUBLISHED for information but since anyone can can have one, not a sign of notability...
Click to read more »Many of the sources recently added to the page are unreliable/ WP:SELFPUBLISHED.4meter4 (talk) 16:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Delete as all of the sources...
Click to read more »search on Google yields nothing but their own website and a number of selfpublished sources such as Twitter and Youtube. In other words nothing that makes...
Click to read more »moved to [3], and the Pitchfork article to [4]. Neither of these is selfpublished, nor is AMG. There is thus significant coverage of the album, and even...
Click to read more »1550, composition of the city of Aintab. Cited references include WP:SELFPUBLISHED maps such as this which ironically also fails verification. As of this...
Click to read more »is more WP:DUE. Does it "deserve" being mentioned on the topic? If selfpublished almost certainly no. If it is written about in-depth in reliable sources...
Click to read more »the article on town in which it was located. The website is also WP:SELFPUBLISHED by a local high school. Doesn't seem particularly reliable as a source...
Click to read more »squared away). The problem now is that the 2012 source seems to be a WP:SELFPUBLISHed e-book. Icewhiz (talk) 16:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC) It's a problem now...
Click to read more »is what's been given above - directory entries (not significant) and selfpublished material (not independent). Guest9999 (talk) 15:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »just a blog). ASTIG😎🙃 13:09, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Source 2 is a WP:SELFPUBLISHED blog. Source 3 is a promo for a music event that has a single WP:TRIVIALMENTION...
Click to read more »ordinarily reliable source used in the footnotes, the rest seem to be selfpublished comments on the panel and its work. So, notability is a question. pcarbon...
Click to read more »support for some pieces and added some additional information from non-selfpublished sources (these do not show up in standard searches -- you need to go...
Click to read more »to tell me what position I am trying to advance, your citation of WP:SELFPUBLISHED was particularly odd.[1] It says, "Self-published material may, in some...
Click to read more »and it would only be reliable if Beau Hindman meets the criteria for selfpublished sources. According to his own website he also did reviews for Ablegamers...
Click to read more »11:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Comment To clarify: The festschrift is not selfpublished, it is published by Accordia Research Institute (University of London)...
Click to read more »reputation for fact checking and accuracy or that if it is treated as WP:SELFPUBLISHED, how are the authors subject-matter-experts? For the Dawn piece- Moreover...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Keep a 20 year old published comic, judged as a webcomic. Selfpublished doesn't hold it when it makes it to (Australian) real-life stores. They...
Click to read more »website is a blog hosting platform that would be subject to WP:BLOG/WP:SELFPUBLISHED. It would therefor be unreliable. We'll see what editors have to say...
Click to read more »q=+Colville) Both unit histories and the PDF document are WP:SELFPUBLISHED sources, and are not usable towards notability, and The London Gazette...
Click to read more »everyone", and http://www.plime.com/ has a "Submit a link". It looks like a selfpublished reference to me. PrimeHunter 00:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Delete — per...
Click to read more »Occurrences of the 35 Julian Easter dates is sourced to what is I guess a selfpublished personal website of a mathematician, and another source is "timeanddate...
Click to read more »notability. I would consider a chapter in one of the non-wikiderived, non-selfpublished, non-pay-per-print books of https://www.google.com/webhp?q=micronations&hl=en...
Click to read more »does not cover it. It is far too close to being WP:Primary and also selfpublished. I know a single editor gets to decide whether a post goes online but...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as original research, or as advertising for the author's selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC) Statement retracted...
Click to read more »including Purnell), most, but not all, of the article's sources are selfpublished sources, have also found these that discuss the model: "Comparison of...
Click to read more »papers and it appears the article is largely original research and selfpublished. jps (talk) 21:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC) NOTE Please see the related deletion...
Click to read more »August 2016 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Republishers. The linked books are selfpublished via Lulu (company). PrimeHunter (talk) 22:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »Albums are self released. He lacks charting, sales, major award. His selfpublished book lacks reviews. Nothing notable in this advert. duffbeerforme (talk)...
Click to read more »Killebrew. Alex (talk) 16:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Yes, but it is selfpublished and if it was that good, wouldn't you use it as a source? I'm seeing...
Click to read more »read. 95.90.183.207 (talk) 20:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC) And all were selfpublished. 95.90.127.86 (talk) 10:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC) Delete does not meetWP:NARTIST...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) After removing selfpublished and misinterpreted sources there are no sources left. -- CFCF 🍌 (email)...
Click to read more »but to tighten it to specifically exclude four websites composed of selfpublished data: Facebook, Myspace, LinkedIn and Utube. I think that would be simple...
Click to read more »Setting aside the fact that the source is your own blog, so WP:SELFPUBLISHED, there is no consensus on what awards make a company notable (again...
Click to read more »walking around videoing a market is not reliable coverage, it is a SELFPUBLISHED source and so unequivocally not reliable or an indicator of notability...
Click to read more »in group exhibits there. I also looked for book reviews of his non-selfpublished books without success. Jahaza (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Hardly convincing, and again, clearly not WP:INDEPENDENT of the WP:SELFPUBLISHed autobiography. I'm not going to bother translating the 2 foreign sources...
Click to read more »Moulding 19:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Delete all, nonnotable author, selfpublished books, all self-promotion. NawlinWiki 19:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »feels problematic in a BLP sense to include a video that verges on selfpublished and makes such claims. I would have removed the video, but two editors...
Click to read more »and steer the discussion back on track. [32] attempted presenting WP:SELFPUBLISHED in clearer terms [33] 3rd party defense of editing bugapi took issue...
Click to read more »same with Hitohiro Saito: this page has two references: his website (selfpublished) and Aikido Journal (one article), nevertheless on that page editors...
Click to read more »individual festival articles are referenced only with WP:PRIMARY, WP:SELFPUBLISHED sources - festival's own website - I looked outside. I see nothing in...
Click to read more »making policy-based arguments here, so I will. The Morris booklet is WP:SELFPUBLISHED and all the Life-boat citations are to WP:TRADES and all are ineligible...
Click to read more »☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 22:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC) Weak keep per WP:SELFPUBLISHED. Weak because one could simply use {{self-published inline}} for citations...
Click to read more »on WP, see WP:NEUTRAL and WP:FLOWERY. Your source [5] may have been selfpublished, see WP:SPS, and may be problematic because of that. If you have WP:COPYPASTEd...
Click to read more »Mewar Residency, volume 2 (1908) offers a single reference. The WP:SELFPUBLISHED Medieval History of Rajasthan, which, even if reliable, gives a single...
Click to read more »give independent details about him. The link of playstation blog is selfpublished. The Bandcamp reference is his own website where he is selling his work...
Click to read more »Delete; like so many articles in the Sarkarverse, it's effectively a selfpublished book, the content relies on primary sources (ie. the book itself), there's...
Click to read more »because of its use in science. Since the only proposed table uses a WP:SELFPUBlished website as its one and only source for the values, it is still very...
Click to read more »worst being to use {{Unreferenced}} when they mean {{refimprove}} or {{selfpublished}}. It is rarely constructive to tell a newbie that an article with a...
Click to read more »reference to your book. Muzilon (talk) 07:18, 23 March 2019 (UTC) Adding selfpublished stuff like this is a little iffy, but probably no great harm will come...
Click to read more »is per the guideline WP:NFCI#10. The Wiki unseen image is a recent selfpublished monochrome artwork by a netizen, it is not per guideline "close substitute"...
Click to read more »sources}} → {{BLP primary sources}} {{Blp selfpub}}, {{BLP selfpub}}, {{BLP selfpublished}}, {{BLP Self-published}}, {{Blp self-published}} → {{BLP self-published}}...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) These pictures are screenshots from software, they are not selfpublished. This is against copyright. Maybe they should be deleted. What is the...
Click to read more »Hobit (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC) The one's I've seen are selfpublished blogs, the ones listed aren't exactly shitting tiffany cufflinks, either...
Click to read more »numerous times with conjectured statements along with non reliable and selfpublished sources that don't fit Wikipedia's Neutral point of view. — Preceding...
Click to read more »ball (the article says it is not happening so it is not), and being a selfpublished source (1UP is owned by UGO Entertainment and is listed as a reliable...
Click to read more »Repeatedly adding attack content to article primarily source by wp:selfpublished sources. i.e. twitter and blog. Jim1138 (talk) 07:33, 2 December 2017...
Click to read more »ISBN 978-1-4993-6557-3. Kaspar, Johann Z. Die Zoransky Familie. ISBN 0692213872.) are selfpublished and the ISBN numbers do not suit the year of publication. --GDEA (talk)...
Click to read more »21 November 2013 (UTC) As mentioned above Freighters of Manitowoc is selfpublished through AuthorHouse and not a reliable source. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:08...
Click to read more »Two days ago I removed a link that User:Dking posted to his personal, selfpublished website.[5] Dking has a history of violations of WP:LINKSPAM (cleanup...
Click to read more »Unlikely search. Article itself is extremely fringe based upon selfpublished work. Doug Weller talk 07:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »published? Ruslik_Zero 15:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC) If your book is selfpublished, see WP:SELFPUB and WP:CITESELF. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:30, 2...
Click to read more »per arguments that were written in discussion. It was not based on selfpublished source as he falsely wrote, but it was based on Antiwar.com and arguments...
Click to read more »no have the backing of any authoritative body. It is effectively WP:SELFPUBLISHED. I can find no evidence from any other source supporting this name for...
Click to read more »single source for the purposes of notability. What about the use of Selfpublished Sources and Blogs as Review material they're not accepted anywhere else...
Click to read more »it- it was a bit raw and looked as we were discussing a non-notable selfpublished author- it has changed in style and content since then, and the fact...
Click to read more »articles on reliable third party sources, instead of using primary selfpublished or questionable sources to build large articles on subjects that, judging...
Click to read more »specific diff by an account with a confirmed owner, and cite the diff as a selfpublished expert source per WP:SELFPUBLISH. I don't know whether we have a specific...
Click to read more »user involved is adding Myspace which is already proven to be a WP:SELFPUBLISHED source with the discussions on the reliable sources noticeboard (see...
Click to read more »acceptable, but they still need to pass WP:RS. A book published (WP:SELFPUBLISHed?) by a family tends to run afoul of the WP:GNG requirement of indepdence...
Click to read more »my own disputes over that before, for some reason people think that selfpublished sources can never be used. The first set is worse. There is a clear...
Click to read more »there's no sources that disagree, you may "get away" with using something selfpublished (like Facebook or Twitter) per WP:SELFSOURCE. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)...
Click to read more »retirement ran a website http://www.savingjews.org/ which was also WP:SELFPUBLISHed as a book or e-book (publishing house listed as A. Poray), 7 refs in...
Click to read more »same argument when re-adding this [264]. At least that time it was not selfpublished (Thomas Nelson (publisher)) and the author is apparently notable Hank...
Click to read more »Carmarck opinion as exceptional specialist on something by linking to some selfpublished text from him, I can't see the OR here. also, counting is not or Shaddim...
Click to read more »of coverage this issue had in international media, resorting to WP:SELFPUBLISHed web sites is quite a fishy practice. "Discrimination against the origin...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable selfpublished leaflet by semi-notable racialist organization. No coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »on sources that mix fact with fiction so freely. Come back with non-selfpublished WP:RS Tijfo098 (talk) 07:29, 26 September 2012 (UTC) Comment. For those...
Click to read more »November 2021 (UTC) (edit conflict) The website appears to be a WP:SELFPUBLISHed resource, with an anonymous editorial team (i.e. the contact email is...
Click to read more »now-blocked sockpuppet. He invented these massacre names based off his own selfpublished document which he REFSPAMmed everywhere. Each alleged event got redirects...
Click to read more »impressed if the first citation at the Weedon Bec article had not been WP:SELFPUBLISHed [I have deleted the sentence, it was redundant in the article anyway]...
Click to read more »that the group was important. The Lady Liberty Book and site are WP:SELFPUBLISHed (therefore not reliable): The author's Linked-in page says that Beaver's...
Click to read more »intern? In an article such a claim would require a reliable source and a selfpublished blog would not be accepted. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:31, 22 September 2008...
Click to read more »found one non-selfpublished source. Doesn't appear to be notable. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:15, 4 January 2019 (UTC) How many non-selfpublished sources does...
Click to read more »uncontroversial stuff, like birthdate and place of birth, can be sourced to selfpublished (by the subject) sources, like an official webpage, Facebook etc. More...
Click to read more »rliable because some of them carrying ISBN. None of the sources are selfpublished. The publishers include the University of Kerala, Carmel International...
Click to read more »also note that as a WP:BLP we shouldn't be building articles from WP:SELFPUBLISHED primary materials. We do in fact need WP:SECONDARY materials to be BLP...
Click to read more »to citing all groups and then to the removal of a large number of wp:SELFPUBLISHED sects, as anyone can claim they have created a “sect”. This seams to...
Click to read more »if it were an autobiography - cf the relevant section of WP:BLP on selfpublished sources for a BLP: "These provisions do not apply to subjects' autobiographies...
Click to read more »(UTC) However, this [6] might add to notability. I don´t think it´s selfpublished. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC) Being referred to...
Click to read more »does that not help, the magazine isn't an RS and Calvet's own book is selfpublished.[5] Every source that mentions Kharsag Tablets so far is fringe, quite...
Click to read more »WP:NEO. Odyssey Online Brandeis and Odyssey Online Penn State: a WP:SELFPUBLISHED source and thus unreliable. (According to its website, "Join Odyssey...
Click to read more »EKWALS, being EU-funded, selfpublishes about its project partners, including Cerisdi, there's no addition to the selfpublished qualification to be found...
Click to read more »CESNUR's editorial board. I don't think this rises above the level of a WP:SELFPUBLISHED article, and so it really doesn't make a dent in terms of notability...
Click to read more »not get this fundamental principle changed. And there are millions of selfpublished websites. Wikipedia is not the place to duplicate the Internet or advertise...
Click to read more »etc, could be ok, but try to avoid if possible. HOWEVER, something selfpublished never helps with WP:N, but I read you to say that the article already...
Click to read more »some of the references given in the article may indeed come under WP Selfpublished sources, others pass as WP:Reliable Sources of course. ~~ Phoe talk...
Click to read more »member or their record label or an official page for the band then it's selfpublished rather than user generated and is probably acceptable for uncontroversial...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Nonnotable young selfpublished poet. Only references are to blogs. NawlinWiki 14:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »questions: Is www.indianautographs.com a reliable source? It seems to be a selfpublished. Secondly, are these signatures truly public domain? If yes to both...
Click to read more »to tell me what position I am trying to advance, your citation of WP:SELFPUBLISHED was particularly odd.[4] It says, "Self-published material may, in some...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sources are either unreliable/selfpublished, not enough for notability, or only mention Wayne Dupree in passing...
Click to read more »coming from which source, at least one of which is not reliable Other selfpublished websites are still in use: Thunder and Lightings, in several other places...
Click to read more »for the link, that's another page which seems to be entirely based on selfpublished Christians in Science website pages which are giving me 404 not found...
Click to read more »that the organisation "appeared in" are from Lulu Press, which is a WP:SELFPUBLISHed source, and is not RS. The section "Criticism" is not about the organisation...
Click to read more »has a single (selfpublished) Google hit [1] outside Wikipedia, and "Shushi Massacres" only has 4 [2] (at least 3 of them selfpublished), so none of the...
Click to read more »Delete: Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:RS. The article is primarily based on selfpublished sources. deadwikipedian (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Delete too...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC) Comment: There already exists WP:SELFPUBLISHED; and "self-serving" means alot of different things, and other things...
Click to read more »rating and content warnings. This is neither WP:UGC nor is it truly a WP:SELFPUBLISHED blug, as it has a editorial and review staff (listed only by first name)...
Click to read more »nonnotable "national expert" (in branding and marketing.) His "book" is a selfpublished e-book described on the page as "available free" for downloading.E.M...
Click to read more »Per nom and WP:BK at 2.1.2 JodyB 12:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Selfpublished book, no indication of notability. NawlinWiki 14:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »aren't selfpublished. There's some disagreement on exactly what constitutes a selfpublished sources, but that government websites are selfpublished seems...
Click to read more »towards the works being "well known"), all/most books appear to have been selfpublished (nothing wrong with that but may not bode well for reviews), and there...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Keep a 20 year old published comic, judged as a webcomic. Selfpublished doesn't hold it when it makes it to (Australian) real-life stores. They...
Click to read more »11:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC) The 7 first books in your gbooks link are selfpublished, how does it support NAUTHOR? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:09, 16 February...
Click to read more »authors selfpublished work as general reliable in all cases. A Biologist who has published works from reliable sources is not a reliable selfpublished source...
Click to read more »11:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC) The 7 first books in your gbooks link are selfpublished, how does it support NAUTHOR? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:09, 16 February...
Click to read more »sources, to modify the two sections above it that restrict the usage of selfpublished or questionable sources. ( I note this section is being modified and...
Click to read more »help. Try using other WP:RS than your book, and if your book is WP:SELFPUBLISHED, don't use it as a source at all. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:21, 5...
Click to read more »truncated, not advertising, but sourced only from the subject's webpage. Selfpublished sources can be used, but not as the basis for the article. I searched...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete a7, selfpublished book, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 18:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia for any length of time and an article cannot be based only on selfpublished sources. Guest9999 (talk) 02:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC) ?Delete maybe...
Click to read more »starting point for you. Are your books WP:SELFPUBLISHED? We have something of a reluctance to use selfpublished sources, though context matters. Gråbergs...
Click to read more »Browserbased game with no assertion of notability. Relies entirely on selfpublished sources. The article lacks coverage by multiple reliable sources independent...
Click to read more »discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author, no reliable sources to show notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:01...
Click to read more »(talk/contribs) 20:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable and likely selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Not Notable...
Click to read more »the DOS article, though there may not be any as all the sources are selfpublished. . dave souza,duplicate !vote removed by Jerry talk 18:03, 13 September...
Click to read more »Moulding 19:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Delete all, nonnotable author, selfpublished books, all self-promotion. NawlinWiki 19:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »assertion of notability) and g11 (using Wikipedia to advertise her selfpublished book). NawlinWiki 02:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Chelsea DeVries (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable selfpublished leaflet by semi-notable racialist organization. No coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »currently uses self-published sources. We can delete this unless new non-selfpublished sources come to light. --sunstar nettalk 16:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC) Merge...
Click to read more »enough wiki editors who know that GoogleHits & Co can also mean a lot of selfpublished WP:NOT junk, especially in fiction and popular culture topics. I also...
Click to read more »Boswell Sisters and is currently used as a reference in that article. WP:SELFPUBLISHED is the link to the relevant policy. Unless these authors are musicologists...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete a7, author of a selfpublished book, which is not an assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:42...
Click to read more »because of its use in science. Since the only proposed table uses a WP:SELFPUBlished website as its one and only source for the values, it is still very...
Click to read more »UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished book, local news coverage isn't very significant. NawlinWiki (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's standards, which are very stringent, Lewdgamer would be a WP:SELFPUBLISHed source. Often, if something is not from an established and widely-recognized...
Click to read more »and linux-magazin.de) mention only Arcavias. The rest are all either selfpublished or indiscriminate software listings. There is also a set of links under...
Click to read more »sign of notability found. His "famous quote" has 3 Google hits, all selfpublished by him. PrimeHunter 02:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Delete although he...
Click to read more »The worst thing about the article is that the references are all WP:SELFPUBlished. Since the band is notable, I'm assuming this can be cleaned up with...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Selfpublished author and anti-child abuse advocate; doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO...
Click to read more »acceptable, but they still need to pass WP:RS. A book published (WP:SELFPUBLISHed?) by a family tends to run afoul of the WP:GNG requirement of indepdence...
Click to read more »if it were an autobiography - cf the relevant section of WP:BLP on selfpublished sources for a BLP: "These provisions do not apply to subjects' autobiographies...
Click to read more »editors and readers can find them somewhere and check what they say. A selfpublished source, for example on the subject's own website, can be used in limited...
Click to read more »might be "known for". --Orland (talk) 09:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. Selfpublished author and nothing else that shows notability can be verified.Sjö (talk)...
Click to read more »article. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC) I did find a selfpublished book on the topic, [1], it's not impossible that reliable sources may...
Click to read more »It's not considered a reliable source because it's a single author's selfpublished work. If he'd published it as a book through one of the publish-on-demand...
Click to read more »Non-notable. Renee (talk) 14:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »rliable because some of them carrying ISBN. None of the sources are selfpublished. The publishers include the University of Kerala, Carmel International...
Click to read more »label, all current and former members are redlinked, sources are either selfpublished or not WP:RS. Terrillja talk 18:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC) Weak delete...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD) Nonnotable young selfpublished poet. Only references are to blogs. NawlinWiki 14:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WP:GNG, a gsearch brings up nothing useable, it appears to have been selfpublished and released just a few days ago, so this article is probably here for...
Click to read more »Article was written by one of the newspapers staff. [3]. Fails WP:SELFPUBLISHed and WP:GNG. Ben Ben (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Delete No evidence...
Click to read more »Patch. Twitter drama. From Patch "Community Member/Neighbor" so WP:SELFPUBLISHED. NYT. Passing mention of a tweet and response to followup questions....
Click to read more »some of the references given in the article may indeed come under WP Selfpublished sources, others pass as WP:Reliable Sources of course. ~~ Phoe talk...
Click to read more »(UTC) However, this [12] might add to notability. I don´t think it´s selfpublished. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC) Being referred to...
Click to read more »article or list." The sources in Draft:Siege of Ragnarok 25 look like selfpublished blogs, forums, and YouTube videos. Bloodbath of B-R5RB has many indpendent...
Click to read more »other languages can be used, see WP:NOENG. This generally excludes selfpublished sources, social media etc, but for example a good newspaper in any language...
Click to read more »missionary books[17] - certain not an independent party. They are "selfpublished" from a Christian pov which is against anything not (their brand of...
Click to read more »search on Google yields nothing but their own website and a number of selfpublished sources such as Twitter and Youtube. In other words nothing that makes...
Click to read more »ordinarily reliable source used in the footnotes, the rest seem to be selfpublished comments on the panel and its work. So, notability is a question. pcarbon...
Click to read more »at all, and the Kickstarter source is unacceptable because it's WP:SELFPUBLISHED. The film doesn't seem to have received significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »— LinguistAtLarge • Talk 14:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Delete The information...
Click to read more »individual festival articles are referenced only with WP:PRIMARY, WP:SELFPUBLISHED sources - festival's own website - I looked outside. I see nothing in...
Click to read more »Editor-In-Chief of kivodaily. Guess what that means? It means Dillon Kivo SELFPUBLISHed the content on his his personal website. However one of the key criteria...
Click to read more »notability. I would consider a chapter in one of the non-wikiderived, non-selfpublished, non-pay-per-print books of https://www.google.com/webhp?q=micronations&hl=en...
Click to read more »non notable author. The book claimed to be a best seller is actually selfpublished, and has a total of 6 copies in worldcat libraries. The scientific publications...
Click to read more »question, we have the germ of an good article here- examining their selfpublished material and comparing that with properly WP:RS article it looks as...
Click to read more »relatively new theory and is still in research." External links are to selfpublished sources, or sites that don't mention line theory or Shukla. Nishant...
Click to read more »bring in higher quality independent secondary sources and to take out selfpublished sources that were not even truly being used as citations. Kevin Gorman...
Click to read more »Despite all the citations, he's essentially the nonnotable author of a selfpublished (Booksurge) book. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »indication of notability (I can read Dutch). "The doctor is in" was selfpublished according to (in English) medialab (scroll down in the "details" iframe)...
Click to read more »could be counted as such. Fanzines seem to largely fall into the WP:SELFPUBLISHED category of non-reliable sources. Case in point, Abyss was published...
Click to read more »the source) in reliable and non-reliable sources. The subject is now "selfpublished", but I am not sure if the subject is notable enough as a writer to...
Click to read more »appointment and his publications are in fringe areas of linguistics and most selfpublished. The three reviews supplied as sources are unfavorable (one calls his...
Click to read more »It's not considered a reliable source because it's a single author's selfpublished work. If he'd published it as a book through one of the publish-on-demand...
Click to read more »papers and it appears the article is largely original research and selfpublished. jps (talk) 21:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC) NOTE Please see the related deletion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) After removing selfpublished and misinterpreted sources there are no sources left. -- CFCF 🍌 (email)...
Click to read more »for the link, that's another page which seems to be entirely based on selfpublished Christians in Science website pages which are giving me 404 not found...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Reflexive Human...
Click to read more »School Band Directors. Alfred Music. pp. 7–. ISBN 978-1-4574-6101-9. is selfpublished, so it won't count, but Sondra Wieland Howe (7 November 2013). Women...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was Speedy delete, WP:SNOW, unpublished or selfpublished work, no references. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC) CrElyan...
Click to read more »does not cover it. It is far too close to being WP:Primary and also selfpublished. I know a single editor gets to decide whether a post goes online but...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) insignificant secondary coverage, all selfpublished, neologism, dubious notability Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:22, 21 July...
Click to read more »publisher=IUniverse to an article an it will trigger MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-selfpublished in bright red. But it is quite amusing that Feeney writes as a statement...
Click to read more »notable but this seems highly promotional. Sources are numerous but selfpublished or press releases. Editor may have COI. Triwbe (talk) 21:54, 3 June...
Click to read more »23:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC) how is mandband-arhicve.com reliable? its a selfpublished source.68.151.25.115 (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »was copies of press releases that wouldn't be enough as those are WP:SELFPUBLISHed. But as long as the laptop has been subject to critical review, that's...
Click to read more »that the organisation "appeared in" are from Lulu Press, which is a WP:SELFPUBLISHed source, and is not RS. The section "Criticism" is not about the organisation...
Click to read more »reliable either. Grsz11 16:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author ("Exposure Publishing" is a selfpublish imprint). NawlinWiki...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, ad for selfpublished book (Lulu.com). NawlinWiki (talk) 02:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Sole...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, ad for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC) The Vril Codex...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as original research, or as advertising for the author's selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC) Statement retracted...
Click to read more »Albums are self released. He lacks charting, sales, major award. His selfpublished book lacks reviews. Nothing notable in this advert. duffbeerforme (talk)...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, promotion for selfpublished or nonpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »legislative documents. They are not independent. www.crwflags.com is a WP:SELFPUBLISHED commercial website that sells flags. It's not reliable. vexilologia...
Click to read more »guess it should be kept, but if not delete since sources now are all selfpublished. SefBau : msg 06:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »journals (albeit of notable organizations) and even his bio-ref is selfpublished and cites or clone this here WP article. The other claim is a book with...
Click to read more »and not on the actual website? You removed Medium sources which are selfpublished but fall under the expert clause that dictates they are acceptable if...
Click to read more »11:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Comment To clarify: The festschrift is not selfpublished, it is published by Accordia Research Institute (University of London)...
Click to read more »reputation for fact checking and accuracy or that if it is treated as WP:SELFPUBLISHED, how are the authors subject-matter-experts? For the Dawn piece- Moreover...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Goldilocks Mission...
Click to read more »book from History Press is in 4 libraries total on worldcat. this + a selfpublished book about what a local society, with references only to local papers...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Selfpublished children's book, does not appear notable. Sources are all apparently...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, ad for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Brooding (Heartland...
Click to read more »"Apostolic Johannite Church." All of the rest of the sources are blogs or selfpublished or don't mention the "Apostolic johannite church" beyond in passing...
Click to read more »187.66.162 (talk) 14:23, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Entsweb.co.uk is a WP:SELFPUBLISHed site, and is therefore not a WP:Reliable source. Invitrovanitas (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Notability (numbers), WP:MADEUP. Only reference is to a preprint selfpublished (see [5]) by Heitor Baldo four days before article was created by User:Heitorb...
Click to read more »Usable, apart from the usual decent secondary sources, is something selfpublished (WP:BLPSELFPUB), like subjects website or (confirmed) social media....
Click to read more »moved to [4], and the Pitchfork article to [5]. Neither of these is selfpublished, nor is AMG. There is thus significant coverage of the album, and even...
Click to read more »at all, one source doesn't say what you're citing it for, and one is selfpublished (on Scribd) by a Sarkar follower. They certainly make the article look...
Click to read more »is what's been given above - directory entries (not significant) and selfpublished material (not independent). Guest9999 (talk) 15:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Setting aside the fact that the source is your own blog, so WP:SELFPUBLISHED, there is no consensus on what awards make a company notable (again...
Click to read more »and it would only be reliable if Beau Hindman meets the criteria for selfpublished sources. According to his own website he also did reviews for Ablegamers...
Click to read more »Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Delete, non-notable...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) I don't know of any notability criteria regarding number of selfpublished books in libraries, and if there were I really don't think 74 would...
Click to read more »same with Hitohiro Saito: this page has two references: his website (selfpublished) and Aikido Journal (one article), nevertheless on that page editors...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No sources except selfpublished that this is notable Finn Rindahl (talk) 23:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, part of advertising for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC) All African Alliance...
Click to read more »is referenced as a self published source by a user [64] yet is the selfpublished source or wiki policy page point out self as an individual or does it...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11, ad for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Guardmount (edit |...
Click to read more »single source for the purposes of notability. What about the use of Selfpublished Sources and Blogs as Review material they're not accepted anywhere else...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) nn, selfpublished (follow the publisher link), notability tagged for two years Kintetsubuffalo...
Click to read more »sources -- WP:BIO talks about "independent sources" in several contexts. Selfpublished sources are not considered independent from the subject, and claims...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's standards, which are very stringent, Lewdgamer would be a WP:SELFPUBLISHed source. Often, if something is not from an established and widely-recognized...
Click to read more »150 (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2019 (UTC) This book [1]? AFAICT, it's selfpublished, so basically, you don't, see WP:SPS. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:06...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This looks like promotional information for series of the selfpublished books. All references lead to the self published materials. Arthistorian1977...
Click to read more »author http://profiles.yahoo.com/mistercoke44 should be allowed as a selfpublished reference. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Why is the...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Keep - Though the article about the newspaper article has selfpublished sources but it should be kept the reason is the newspaper is regional...
Click to read more »CESNUR's editorial board. I don't think this rises above the level of a WP:SELFPUBLISHED article, and so it really doesn't make a dent in terms of notability...
Click to read more »"Apostolic Johannite Church." All of the rest of the sources are blogs or selfpublished or don't mention the "Apostolic johannite church" beyond in passing...
Click to read more »towards the works being "well known"), all/most books appear to have been selfpublished (nothing wrong with that but may not bode well for reviews), and there...
Click to read more »editors remain unconvinced. Because the news clippings are hosted on a SELFPUBLISHed site as images, personally I think that at least some of them could...
Click to read more »this is clearly verifiable: Here it is!. WP:V allows the citation of selfpublished sources about themselves.Grace Note 03:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Weak keep...
Click to read more »either. Michitaro (talk) 11:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC) Seeing as it is a selfpublished book and a failed crowdfunded project it is possible that it won't be...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Selfpublished author of dubious notability, does clearly not pass WP:AUTHOR. Any real...
Click to read more »page. The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising for unfinished, selfpublished book series, article written by (of course) books' author-to-be. NawlinWiki...
Click to read more »standards. A google search turns up some social networking, and other selfpublished stuff, but not much in the way of in-depth coverage. Also nominating...
Click to read more »unlikely to be RS: bjjheroes.com/about clealy self-identifies as a WP:SELFPUBLISHed fan site. jiujitsutimes.com says they have an ABOUT US page, but it...
Click to read more »notability, either in article or on Amazon page, which shows it as a selfpublished book with negligible sales. -Nat Gertler (talk) 00:38, 16 April 2013...
Click to read more »15:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC) I'm confused by this reasoning. There are selfpublished albums, aren't there? And aren't albums defined by the number of songs...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nonnotable selfpublished poet. Only references are to blogs, book selling websites, and mirrors...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) It should be noted that both creationist reviews are WP:SELFPUBlished, so really don't do anything to add to WP:GNG. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:12...
Click to read more »creator. An eBook that does not meet WP:NBOOK criteria, appears WP:SELFPUBLISHED, and article is somewhat promotional in tone with no references to reliable...
Click to read more »Delete; like so many articles in the Sarkarverse, it's effectively a selfpublished book, the content relies on primary sources (ie. the book itself), there's...
Click to read more »Hardly convincing, and again, clearly not WP:INDEPENDENT of the WP:SELFPUBLISHed autobiography. I'm not going to bother translating the 2 foreign sources...
Click to read more »asserted. Clubmarx (talk) 16:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC) Delete nonnotable selfpublished (if published at all) book. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:44, 23 August 2009...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11 (ad for selfpublished book), a7 (author nonnotable), WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:29, 28...
Click to read more »cover page lists only an author, no editor, indicating it is all but WP:SELFPUBLISHED. Chetsford (talk) 04:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC) Looks reliable-enough...
Click to read more »book from History Press is in 4 libraries total on worldcat. this + a selfpublished book about what a local society, with references only to local papers...
Click to read more »Wikipedia article. The article in Wikipedia on JWASM may be under WP:SELFPUBLISHED. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:08, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Magioladitis, you...
Click to read more »article of 2. 4) i don't know the website: outpersonals.com but it is selfpublished so not usable. 5) it is not about the subject which is not even mentioned...
Click to read more »all the pages on specific books), advertising for article creator's selfpublished books. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC) The Xenton Chronicles...
Click to read more »(webzine). chicagostagereview.com is a self published websites, but per WP:SELFPUBLISHED which states "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable...
Click to read more »about the rest, even if probably a couple of the other websites are not selfpublished/blog sites. In my opinion it is not so few coverage, considering metalcore...
Click to read more »17:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC) Comment, nom is incorrect about book being selfpublished, lark is an imprint of Sterling Publishing which in turn is part of...
Click to read more »image could be considered as a credible one, when it is hosted on a WP:SELFPUBLISHED site and the named title has no sources? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions...
Click to read more »on coola this book contains a stamp list (oh, crap!), no, wait, its selfpublished (whew!!:)). Coolabahapple (talk) Delete - How can we verify, no RS available...
Click to read more »ISBN 978-1-4993-6557-3. Kaspar, Johann Z. Die Zoransky Familie. ISBN 0692213872.) are selfpublished and the ISBN numbers do not suit the year of publication. --GDEA (talk)...
Click to read more »on sources that mix fact with fiction so freely. Come back with non-selfpublished WP:RS Tijfo098 (talk) 07:29, 26 September 2012 (UTC) Comment. For those...
Click to read more »precedence in this AfD, particularly as it relates to RS and acceptance of selfpublished, etc. The BLP subject of this AfD is an academic; therefore PROF is...
Click to read more »existing ideas of Vertical farming. Most sources in the article are selfpublished, either directly (the company website) or indirectly (mynewsdesk.com...
Click to read more »14 May 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom. Article is entirely sourced to WP:SELFPUBLISHED WP:PRIMARY sources, and it doesn't look like there's anything better...
Click to read more »believe this person fails WP:ARTIST. Written like an advert with a selfpublished link. Maybe re-create article when he is more established? Gbawden (talk)...
Click to read more »Indian Private company filled with Press releases/announcements or selfpublished resources, WP:MILL. Lack of significant coverage with in-depth information...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unverified, not notable--selfpublished books by a non-notable author. Really, DB-A9 should apply to books as...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was Speedy delete g11 as advertising for selfpublished book (note that book does not appear on Amazon or Google Books search)...
Click to read more »find substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Mentions in selfpublished books notwithstanding. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Published by Xlibris Corporation, an unreliable WP:SELFPUBLISHED source. Given you lack experience on AfDs, I would inform you that experienced...
Click to read more »library holdings on Worldcat - adesh katariya, books appear to all be selfpublished/print on demand, not necessarily a problem in itself, but have been...
Click to read more »adding Reliable sources. All references are from networking sites and selfpublished source. SefBau : msg 08:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »Special:Diff/940950768 by Sangdeboeuf, who stated that "Psychology Today blogs are WP:SELFPUBLISHED sources – not generally reliable for factual claims". A previous RSN...
Click to read more »Hobit (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC) The one's I've seen are selfpublished blogs, the ones listed aren't exactly shitting tiffany cufflinks, either...
Click to read more »September 2011 (UTC) The paper is not a reliable source, it is clearly selfpublished and have comparable authority to a blog post.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:39,...
Click to read more »and statistical data (although I do have my doubts due to it being WP:SELFPUBLISHED). My issue with using it for this, though, is that the authors of CFDW...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, references provided do not work or are selfpublished and do not meet WP:RS --Eng. M.Bandara-Talk 00:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Petersen (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC) No kim it is not, it is selfpublished, it is as you say pure opinion, and of course no editorial control,...
Click to read more »of course, hosts companies' press releases on the web and, per wp:SELFPUBLISHED, companies' press releases are considered reliable about such indiv...
Click to read more »at all, one source doesn't say what you're citing it for, and one is selfpublished (on Scribd) by a Sarkar follower. They certainly make the article look...
Click to read more »mention of the show on Kent Online. The current sources are all WP:SELFPUBLISHED or not independent of the subject. In an attempt to pursue WP:ATD I...
Click to read more »that the group was important. The Lady Liberty Book and site are WP:SELFPUBLISHed (therefore not reliable): The author's Linked-in page says that Beaver's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia article. The article in Wikipedia on JWASM may be under WP:SELFPUBLISHED. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:08, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Magioladitis, you...
Click to read more »article of 2. 4) i don't know the website: outpersonals.com but it is selfpublished so not usable. 5) it is not about the subject which is not even mentioned...
Click to read more »was copies of press releases that wouldn't be enough as those are WP:SELFPUBLISHed. But as long as the laptop has been subject to critical review, that's...
Click to read more »sourcing requirements - certainly more than can be passed with a single WP:SELFPUBLISHed source. --Aquillion (talk) 17:48, 7 November 2018 (UTC) The Web page...
Click to read more »original research. The website travel-around-japan.com is clearly WP:SELFPUBLISHED, as seen here, and so also does not meet WP:RS. The second paragraph...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) nn selfpublished album, no independent coverage Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:56, 3 March...
Click to read more »acceptable. B)Editor uploads screenshot to commons/Wikipedia to verify selfpublished claim of X - not acceptable. If it has been deleted, its fails WP:V...
Click to read more »16:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Sho-shin. Owner is named Robert Cole, seems a selfpublished site. There is a Robert E. Cole, who wrote some books about the Japanese...
Click to read more »09:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC) Seems you're right. Most references are selfpublished. I suggest for deletion. SefBau : msg 13:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »might be "known for". --Orland (talk) 09:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. Selfpublished author and nothing else that shows notability can be verified.Sjö (talk)...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Essentially all these publications are selfpublished. The reviews seems to be routine noticex in Whats On and the like. DGG...
Click to read more »Wiley's page has one reference from a reliable source that is not selfpublished or Resume like. This one reference does not establish notability. Spent...
Click to read more »sources are fine, you can´t continue claiming them unreliable, obscure,selfpublished, etc. There are more sources available about the game, but for some...
Click to read more »site is nothing more than a blog and thus the article itself remains selfpublished under WP:SPS. If evidence is presented that the site provides any kind...
Click to read more »content (ala Indymedia). If that is the case, it should be treated as WP:SELFPUBLISHED. See: Hong Kong In-Media is the most influential independent online...
Click to read more »does that not help, the magazine isn't an RS and Calvet's own book is selfpublished.[15] Every source that mentions Kharsag Tablets so far is fringe, quite...
Click to read more »subject of the articles) and as an external link (advertising, not a selfpublished work by a recognized authority). How is it defensible to include it...
Click to read more »(UTC) AnApple47, welcome to the Teahouse! Based on [2] it seems a bit selfpublished, then again, it doesn't seem like very controversial info. In this particular...
Click to read more »WP:MUSICBIO. This is probably the only WP:RS used, but the rest are WP:SELFPUBLISHed. Not enough sources to meet GNG or MUSICBIO. Also, why does an article...
Click to read more »support for some pieces and added some additional information from non-selfpublished sources (these do not show up in standard searches -- you need to go...
Click to read more »17 July 2019 (UTC) I concur with Icewhiz´s opinion in linked AfD: selfpublished source written by someone who is not renowned expert in the field is...
Click to read more »with you doing so. Lmical, all the sources you mention are still WP:SELFPUBLISHED, official websites have no editor and no editorial process, anyone can...
Click to read more »squared away). The problem now is that the 2012 source seems to be a WP:SELFPUBLISHed e-book. Icewhiz (talk) 16:27, 17 July 2019 (UTC) It's a problem now...
Click to read more »The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability (being a selfpublished author is not such an assertion). NawlinWiki (talk) 15:50, 10 January...
Click to read more »Podiaebba (talk) 16:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC) We should not treat Parry's (selfpublished) site as a reliable source. bobrayner (talk) 23:13, 11 November 2013...
Click to read more »21 November 2013 (UTC) As mentioned above Freighters of Manitowoc is selfpublished through AuthorHouse and not a reliable source. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:08...
Click to read more »including Purnell), most, but not all, of the article's sources are selfpublished sources, have also found these that discuss the model: "Comparison of...
Click to read more »recognizing online social websites such as FB as an acceptable source per WP:SELFPUBLISHED. What has stirred my curiosity of late is how material published on...
Click to read more »of its article. That would only appear to be a reliable souce as a selfpublished primary source of libertanian thought. . . dave souza, talk 15:07, 13...
Click to read more »Published by Xlibris Corporation, an unreliable WP:SELFPUBLISHED source. Given you lack experience on AfDs, I would inform you that experienced...
Click to read more »this is clearly verifiable: Here it is!. WP:V allows the citation of selfpublished sources about themselves.Grace Note 03:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Weak keep...
Click to read more »Cordless Larry (talk) 18:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC) I'd agree that it's selfpublished, and am curious why there's pressure to use inadequate sources like...
Click to read more »June 2019 (UTC) Quora is very clearly not a Reliable Source. It's all SELFPUBLISHED. Anything posted there may or may not be true, and you need a proper...
Click to read more »Justice007 (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC) This apparently WP:SELFPUBLISHed web site is used to include certain juicy details in those articles...
Click to read more »second source is not significant coverage, and your third source is WP:SELFPUBLISHED. guninvalid (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2025 (UTC) Hello, @Outsidetable6856...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) It should be noted that both creationist reviews are WP:SELFPUBlished, so really don't do anything to add to WP:GNG. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:12...
Click to read more »environmental degradation, are incalculable This appears to me to be a selfpublished opinion site and does not seem to meet the criteria of wp:rs mark nutley...
Click to read more »some of the content has no editorial review at all (being effectively selfpublished by the "editor"), and some of the content is pretty clearly paid content...
Click to read more »problem. We already get complaints that MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-selfpublished is confusing, and it only lists five sources. This one will have ten...
Click to read more »at Talk:Aquatic ape hypothesis regarding the possible inclusion of a selfpublished e-book in the article. The book is one of a few works published about...
Click to read more »27 January 2019 (UTC) Strengthening MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-selfpublished might help. The icon can be changed to File:Information orange.svg or...
Click to read more »(UTC) Brunch is a South Korean blogging service, unreliable per WP:SELFPUBLISHED. seefooddiet (talk) 06:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC) I am here sending you...
Click to read more »Zion. [14] Now, I think this would quite clearly be unreliable as WP:SELFPUBLISHED, but the source is actually very much used in article space: indymedia...
Click to read more »discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Delete, nonnotable selfpublished author, no reliable sources to show notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:01...
Click to read more »22:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC) If a paper is only in arXiv then it's selfpublished with no peer review and unsuitable as reference for Wikipedia, except...
Click to read more »wrong statements have been made here; the book "Blood brothers" is not "selfpublished" (a remarkable claim for a book which has been translated to 20 languages)...
Click to read more »doing well it cannot be a reliable source under current policy. Any selfpublished source is inadmissible as a reliable source for any other statement...
Click to read more »and not on the actual website? You removed Medium sources which are selfpublished but fall under the expert clause that dictates they are acceptable if...
Click to read more »a fact? Of course not. They're not academic, not peer-reviewed, and selfpublished agenda activist biased organization, with no neutrality. Our most comprehensive...
Click to read more »intercourse". Itsmejudith (talk) 22:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC) It's WP:SELFPUBLISHed material. The main author Gary Wilson's credentials do not bring him...
Click to read more »publishes in an unreliable source, then the source would be considered WP:SELFPUBLISHED.VR talk 18:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC) That is a WP:SYNTH assumption;...
Click to read more »don't think CGP Grey videos are unusable as sources. YouTube is WP:SELFPUBLISHed; being considered an expert sufficient to pass that policy requires...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) I have fixed the google link for you. This is clearly a selfpublished source and falls under WP:SPS. This policy says: "Self-published material...
Click to read more »precedence in this AfD, particularly as it relates to RS and acceptance of selfpublished, etc. The BLP subject of this AfD is an academic; therefore PROF is...
Click to read more »Editor-In-Chief of kivodaily. Guess what that means? It means Dillon Kivo SELFPUBLISHed the content on his his personal website. However one of the key criteria...
Click to read more »Retrieved November 13, 2016. Generally this type of source fails rs as selfpublished, unless the writer is an expert who has had his or her work on the same...
Click to read more »awards but the article still needs some better sourcing. Blogs and selfpublished material are not reliable. To me at least its clearer what this should...
Click to read more »need to be third party if they're used to establish notability, but selfpublished sources can be used for non-contentious material as long as the article...
Click to read more »with you are "involved" A bunch of us do not agree that mlmwatch is selfpublished Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC) So Icerate...
Click to read more »no other edits outside this topic. Endorse deletion The book is WP:SELFPUBlished by a member of Aset ka, see this forum discussion[48], so it's not an...
Click to read more »(UTC) (no relation ;->) Yeah, nice. But the papers are not relevant. Selfpublished, not peer reviewed. Thus not good enough science to include. --Soyweiser...
Click to read more »rather than through a conference proceedings which would be a non-selfpublished source. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC) The first page...
Click to read more »mainstream media outlets, YouTube videos aren't reliable sources per WP:SELFPUBLISHED. seefooddiet (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC) Keep. The sources...
Click to read more »Christian missionary books[8] - certain not an independent party. They are "selfpublished" from a Christian pov which is against anything not (their brand of...
Click to read more »published by AuthorHouse, which is a vanity press and thus it's a WP:SELFPUBLISHED source and not reliable. English Wikipedia does not condemn almost all...
Click to read more »Slatersteven (talk) 18:51, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Wholly Unreliable WP:SELFPUBLISHed Copaganda, site is full of conspiracy theories and Misinformation related...
Click to read more »in terms of selfpublished, that will help us avoid the contradiction of allowing a source to be both selfpublished and not selfpublished. Once one form...
Click to read more »31 October 2018 (UTC) @JzG: Perhaps MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-selfpublished should let good-faith editors know which sources tripped the filter...
Click to read more »anything to support that, all this works I can find on Google books are selfpublished and a Google search didn't turn up anything, but there might be something...
Click to read more »dozen at least, click here to see.[1] You can also list his non-WP:SELFPUBLISHED books, but it is usually best to find at least one or two book-reviews...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV of the topic. The report by Vollan is a WP:PRIMARY and WP:SELFPUBLISHED source by an NGO (and NGO reports are notoriously unreliable as they...
Click to read more »reliable sources? Hcobb (talk) 02:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC) I think WP:SELFPUBLISHED applies here. It's clear that it's a press release commissioned by the...
Click to read more »glance it's expert opinion by Beate Liepert which appears to meet rs for selfpublished sources. Rather off topic, if you want to keep trying please take it...
Click to read more »24 May 2026 (UTC) I personally don't believe this is selfpublished, but if it was selfpublished information is held to a different standard. See WP:SPS...
Click to read more »March 2015 (UTC) @Rhoark: Thank you for your response. According to WP:SELFPUBLISHED, the characteristic feature of self-published sources that makes them...
Click to read more »need to be third party if they're used to establish notability, but selfpublished sources can be used for non-contentious material as long as the article...
Click to read more »read the official policy at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Selfpublished material by the subject can be used as source in some cases, but your...
Click to read more »that information can be found to verify a fact in a source that is not selfpublished. There are literally thousands of books written about the Catholic Church...
Click to read more »insinuating a living person engaged in all kinds of malfeasance, and is selfpublished. If a reputable news agency picks it up, perhaps we can link to the...
Click to read more »notable. -Arch dude (talk) 15:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC) The book also looks selfpublished. The Amazon page says "Publisher: Datum Books", but a Google search...
Click to read more »editorial process that confirms facts. This Wordpress site is a WP:SELFPUBLISHed source, and to be considered reliable, the author has to be an established...
Click to read more »00:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC). Further, the article cites an unreliable WP:SELFPUBLISHed sources in the Nicolai article and the Zwettler self-published book...
Click to read more »Patch. Twitter drama. From Patch "Community Member/Neighbor" so WP:SELFPUBLISHED. NYT. Passing mention of a tweet and response to followup questions....
Click to read more »while the BLPSELFPUB and BLPSPS sections are only about whether a selfpublished source can be used in an article about the living person who self-published...
Click to read more »or isn't selfpublished. There's agreement that if a person can write and publish without any intermediate then that's definitely selfpublished, the opposite...
Click to read more »Google search and moved it here. Nonnotable children's book, seems to be selfpublished, available only at bookstores in the US South, 226 unique Ghits NawlinWiki...
Click to read more »copyright for the image used in the article, and who keeps removing selfpublished and coi tags from the article. Could others please look it over? A lot...
Click to read more »the biography in addition. So I would strongly suggest to include the selfpublished references regarding academic qualifications, include the alternative...
Click to read more »the authors of the article Henry Doctorsky[8] is disputed along with (selfpublished) IUniverse ;-) book After the Absolute: Real Life Adventures with a...
Click to read more »trimming now. Much of the article is based on this; an autobiography selfpublished on a Turkish website which looks rather like Scribd. bobrayner (talk)...
Click to read more »information. As to whether it's selfpublished, reading the about us is confusing. I think the website started as selfpublished, as a way for the owner to publish...
Click to read more »irrelevant detail in depth, but that's just uncritical coverage by WP:SELFPUBlished non-independient sources. Per Kesh: the admin took into account those...
Click to read more »author and publisher are still the same person, so it is still being selfpublished, even if Barrett seeks advice on some articles. - Bilby (talk) 20:03...
Click to read more »(UTC) Option 2 because Marc is a topic expert but his website is WP:SELFPUBLISHed so considerations for that apply.--Droid I am (talk) 09:11, 6 October...
Click to read more »user involved is adding Myspace which is already proven to be a WP:SELFPUBLISHED source with the discussions on the reliable sources noticeboard (see...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:52, 24 April 2013 (UTC) We have to be very careful about using selfpublished sources for content in articles - usually it's a no, but there are exceptions...
Click to read more »