This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
coverage for the period to warrant an article. Shortcuts WP:SPORTSEVENTWP:SPORTSEVENT WP:NSPORTSEVENTWP:NSPORTSEVENT Regular season games in professional and...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article(s) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as it largely contains only statistics (in the form of event results)...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) It fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG as they are second-tiered matches which also fails WP:CRICKET...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable event. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Luchuslu (talk) 04:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »editors both arguing to Keep and Delete with the same rationale (i.e. WP:SPORTSEVENT) it is clear that the relevance of this type of event to the guideline...
Click to read more »believe it fails WP:SPORTSEVENT Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Delete - Per above. I agree; it fails WP:SPORTSEVENT in that it lacks reliable...
Click to read more »and the only source links to a list of fight results. This fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and all coverage is WP:ROUTINE. Papaursa (talk) 01:10, 11 April 2013...
Click to read more »lacks "well-sourced prose, not merely a list of stats" to satisfy WP:SPORTSEVENT. TreyGeek (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC) I am also nominating the following...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This particular game fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. There is no coverage by reliable sources except routine coverage. Vanjagenije...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable event. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Luchuslu (talk) 03:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »by anyone. Laurdecl talk 09:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPORTSEVENT. Also looking at some of the individual pages, many of the results have...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Local sports event, does not meet WP:SPORTSEVENT, very limited news coverage (the only ones found by another editor were...
Click to read more »editors both arguing to Keep and Delete with the same rationale (i.e. WP:SPORTSEVENT) it is clear that the relevance of this type of event to the guideline...
Click to read more »editors both arguing to Keep and Delete with the same rationale (i.e. WP:SPORTSEVENT) it is clear that the relevance of this type of event to the guideline...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT with no well-sourced prose; consists only of WP:ROUTINE coverage. LlamaAl...
Click to read more »America1000 00:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Strong Delete - It clearly fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Furthermore, I do not see how this could work as a standalone article...
Click to read more »that this event (the first one for a new MMA organization) passes WP:SPORTSEVENT or any other notability criteria. Jakejr (talk) 22:53, 3 January 2012...
Click to read more »contains very little in the way of well-sourced prose as required by WP:SPORTSEVENT. There appears to be little coverage of the event(s) outside of WP:ROUTINE...
Click to read more »series, where there is no indication that this single game meets WP:SPORTSEVENT, as it is not held as any more notable than any other LCS Game 7. – Muboshgu...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as a motor racing event. Article is really just a results listing LibStar...
Click to read more »editors both arguing to Keep and Delete with the same rationale (i.e. WP:SPORTSEVENT) it is clear that the relevance of this type of event to the guideline...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »matches shows that they aren't notable enough for a Wikipedia article. WP:SPORTSEVENT requires A game that is widely considered by independent reliable sources...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - amateur and semi pro says it all, doesn't it? Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT.--70.80.234.163 (talk) 01:57, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »editors both arguing to Keep and Delete with the same rationale (i.e. WP:SPORTSEVENT) it is clear that the relevance of this type of event to the guideline...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article contents fail WP:SPORTSEVENT in that they lack well-sourced prose discussing the event and do not...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT with no well-sourced prose. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE and article relies...
Click to read more »editors both arguing to Keep and Delete with the same rationale (i.e. WP:SPORTSEVENT) it is clear that the relevance of this type of event to the guideline...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »Unable to find the independent sourcing required to pass WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Contested with I have updated some references and I have noticed thats...
Click to read more »so individual fights will almost certainly not pass WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProElite: Big Guns. Previous...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. czar · · 05:14, 1 May 2013 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG. LlamaAl (talk) 01:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Delete - Fails the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG. List A cricket tours are not recommended as part of the WP:Cricket...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »The linchpin of WP:SPORTSEVENT is not between "series"&"tournament", but between "top league"&"feeder leagues"; the 'WP:SPORTSEVENT' guideline tells us...
Click to read more »passes WP:SPORTSEVENT. Coverage appears to be routine sports reporting. Jakejr (talk) 00:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC) Delete Subject fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and is...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MMAEVENT, WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT, the coverage that this "event" received was totally routine in nature...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) no evidence of meeting WP:SPORTSEVENT. routine fighting event. having notable participants does not mean it's...
Click to read more »it is the world championship. All global contests pass WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. DrStrauss talk 16:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »18:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC) Delete Subject does not appear to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT or have the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG...
Click to read more »Presents: Sengoku 3 World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku 1 all fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. routine non notable sporting results LibStar (talk) 08:33, 19 September...
Click to read more »playing soccer in the conference in 2013. Even so, fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT, which applies as season notability is only for single team articles...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. world championships are notable but this one is regional and gets only...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article seems to fail WP:SPORTSEVENT - no well-sourced prose to assert notability of this regular season game...
Click to read more »December 2011 (UTC) Delete I found nothing to show this event passes WP:SPORTSEVENT. Appears to be another case of routine sports reporting. Jakejr (talk)...
Click to read more »fighting results, with no evidence of long term notability to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT LibStar (talk) 00:09, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Delete both I don't see that any of these events pass WP:SPORTSEVENT. That's why so many of them were deleted when they were individual articles...
Click to read more »Valkyrie another series of non notable sporting results that fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. coverage is all primary sources. LibStar (talk) 00:09, 7 November 2011...
Click to read more »Top End T20 Series) for the same reasons, failure of WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT. a qualifying event for another event with no third party sources. also...
Click to read more »Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPORTSEVENT, which this doesn't seem to meet ("ICC Americas" is at least one or two...
Click to read more »are that this friendly tournament doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Also worth noting that WP:NOTDATABASE states that merely being true...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I am concerned that this does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. This may not even satisfy basic WP:V as there are no sources in the...
Click to read more »series of non notable qualifying events with no coverage to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 11:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC) LibStar (talk) 11:29, 12...
Click to read more »Syed Modi International Badminton Championships and already passes WP:SPORTSEVENT.Stvbastian (talk) 04:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Keep Much like what Stvbastian...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. merely a results listing with no long standing notability. LibStar (talk)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable as per WP:SPORTSEVENT Ad Orientem (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »nonsense. --Kasper2006 (talk) 17:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Delete fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Not covered in mainstream media. LibStar (talk) 03:13, 4 November 2022...
Click to read more »Amsterdam another sprawling series of fighting results that fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. those wanting keep must provide evidence of third party coverage. LibStar...
Click to read more »Delete all - Fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. LlamaAl (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Delete All - Not notable enough to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT requirements. El3ctr1csheepz...
Click to read more »World Tournament Open K-1 World Grand Prix 2005 in Seoul all fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »Basically, the events are non-notable failing WP:GNG, WP:ROUTINE, WP:SPORTSEVENT and possibly more. TreyGeek (talk) 01:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC) I am also...
Click to read more »TWL) List of non-notable events is non-notable (fails WP:ROUTINE, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG). Precendent includes Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MMAEVENT, WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT, the coverage that this "event" received was totally routine in nature...
Click to read more »editors both arguing to Keep and Delete with the same rationale (i.e. WP:SPORTSEVENT) it is clear that the relevance of this type of event to the guideline...
Click to read more »upcoming 2017 tournaments. I can't find much evidence these meet WP:SPORTSEVENT (which I think are the relevant notability criteria), unless these count...
Click to read more »editors both arguing to Keep and Delete with the same rationale (i.e. WP:SPORTSEVENT) it is clear that the relevance of this type of event to the guideline...
Click to read more »Fails WP:GNG as well as any topical notability guidelines such as WP:SPORTSEVENT. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »--TreyGeek (talk) 00:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Delete Article fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:ROUTINE. There's no indication of notability. Astudent0 (talk)...
Click to read more »have this level of coverage. In short, no evidence that WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT are met as far as my searches are going. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:27...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. There was a discussion on the talk page about why this was an article...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »2000 Another useless series of qualifying results that do not meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 14:20, 15 October 2011 (UTC) LibStar (talk) 14:20, 15...
Click to read more »contains virtually nothing in the way of "well-sourced prose" to satisfy WP:SPORTSEVENT and cites no references at all. In looking for references I'm finding...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. Single reference is to a score page. WP:BEFORE only turned up short...
Click to read more »This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate...
Click to read more »another useless series of non notable qualifying results that fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. no long term notability 13 years later. LibStar (talk) 05:40, 14 October...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »20 March 2012 (UTC) Delete fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 05:51, 26 March 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPORTSEVENT. Entire page is a copyvio of this source...
Click to read more »editors both arguing to Keep and Delete with the same rationale (i.e. WP:SPORTSEVENT) it is clear that the relevance of this type of event to the guideline...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. having notable participants isn't good enough. no third party coverage...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. merely an events listing. and all participants non notable. also nominating:...
Click to read more »accomplishment for the team, but does not mean the game itself meets WP:SPORTSEVENT. The current article is mostly a list of the previous matches leading...
Click to read more »Chisinau Another useless series of fighting qualifying results that fail WP:SPORTSEVENT for lack of third party coverage. Most competitors are non notable. LibStar...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, WP:EVENT, and WP:SPORTSEVENT as there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting...
Click to read more »Alkmaar another series of non notable qualifying results that fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. no evidence of third party coverage or enduring notability to meet WP:PERSISTENCE...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This article does not credibly assert notability as a WP:SPORTSEVENT; it's a "Youth championship" qualifier series. As a WP:EVENT, it similarly...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »the only event this organization has promoted and it fails to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. Astudent0 (talk) 19:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC) ONE Fighting Championship:...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Its claim to notability is that it is the first homecoming football...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. International tournaments from two second tier teams are not notable...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV per nom. Vestrian24Bio 09:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC) Delete. These games are not...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »two championship fights (which I would argue make this notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT) and the steroid controversy, you can make a good argument for this event...
Click to read more »brothers, which is possible, this will always stand out as the first. WP:SPORTSEVENT states Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose, not...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable match. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Delete all Events fail WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:ROUTINE. Astudent0 (talk) 20:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »following related pages because they also give no indication of meeting WP:SPORTSEVENT. Shark Fights 13 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »Badminton Championships - can't see how this would pass WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »staying but this 2021–22 article should be deleted for failing WP:GNG, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:V. All of the sources cited are just the exact same press releases...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »unblocked editors. I think the issues arguing for deletion are WP:EVENT/WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:ROUTINE. Jakejr (talk) 00:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Let's see how...
Click to read more »regular season college football games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »previous AfD, participants supported deletion based on WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT. However, the "delete" arguments did not analyze the sources mentioned...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, WP:EVENT, and WP:SPORTSEVENT as there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting...
Click to read more »sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting...
Click to read more »Editor Overdrive (talk) 17:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Not according to WP:SPORTSEVENT. This is just routine sports coverage. Astudent0 (talk) 19:00, 21 November...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This article does not credibly assert notability as a WP:SPORTSEVENT; it's a "Youth championship" qualifier series. As a WP:EVENT, it similarly...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Just a results listing. Almost all the sources are primary from the...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »Fails WP:GNG for lack of available independent sources. Also fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as far as I can tell.- MrX 18:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC) - MrX 18:32, 20...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »contains simple fight announcements and thus fails WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT. There is nothing to suggest that the event will have any lasting effects...
Click to read more »significant coverage for any of these events and they all seem to fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. Papaursa (talk) 06:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Delete all per nom. Wikipedia...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. No lasting notability for either team. Fails basic WP:SPORTSEVENT. Friendlies would not count for items 1 to 3, and item 4 states A game...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Delete - Individual sports event which falls short of WP:SPORTSEVENT. And WP:GNG. Per nom and others, this was just an otherwise fairly ROTM...
Click to read more »for deletion of all these articles, per not meeting the criteria at WP:SPORTSEVENT. North America1000 20:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Athletics at the 2015...
Click to read more »newspapers.com, but none of the "extensive coverage" required by WP:SPORTSEVENT which would justify a standalone article. Hatman31 (talk) 15:29, 30 November...
Click to read more »qualifying results with no evidence of third party coverage to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 00:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »of this game. Mtking (edits) 04:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC) Keep per WP:SPORTSEVENT: "College bowl games" are "inherently notable". Clarityfiend (talk) 04:54...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »not even an independent source anyway. No evidence of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT as with many other junior matches that have had articles created recently...
Click to read more »result was delete. There is a consensus that this match does not meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 09:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC) Uruguay...
Click to read more »unlikely search term. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 14:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC) Delete Agree with WP:SPORTSEVENT about not needing redirect. Add...
Click to read more »First; Dothan is the town in which the tournament is located). Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. —SW— express 15:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »TWL) Poorly-sourced article about an amateur sporting event. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NOTSTATS. - MrX 16:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »publicized and hyped, since these games are fairly rare. And according to WP:SPORTSEVENT, which states that Articles about notable games should have well-sourced...
Click to read more »Kabaddi Cup" and "Canada Kabaddi Cup" in my searches. Potentially fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG. Would have redirected to Canada World Kabaddi Cup but, oddly...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. No third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 01:40, 7 December 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »of one contender in one semi-reliable soure (a local paper). Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as no depth or duration of coverage. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) blatantly fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. dubious notability of an under 21 event. LibStar (talk) 08:52, 13 November...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Recreated again after an Afd deletion on this previously. Abishe (talk)...
Click to read more »sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting...
Click to read more »significant coverage, only a link to a broken video. Unless evidence of WP:SPORTSEVENT or WP:GNG can be provided, the article must be deleted. Spiderone(Talk...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. While this game was something of an upset and it got a little more coverage...
Click to read more »competition. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 09:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC) Delete fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. This article is a waste of space. LibStar (talk) 12:32, 24 October 2011...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. this is an under 20 competition for ice hockey which is amateur and...
Click to read more »season. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 23:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPORTSEVENT. Maybe redirect (but no sourced content worth merging) to 2007 ASA Midwest...
Click to read more »Stuartyeates (talk) 02:36, 15 October 2011 (UTC) delete clearly fails WP:SPORTSEVENT . LibStar (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not seem to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT or WP:GNG. Much the same as 1998 Cyprus International Tournament, which...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unremarkable event. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Merging with the main article could also be a possibility. Sportsfan...
Click to read more »don't mention me) 06:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Keep. Meets WP:GNG, meets WP:SPORTSEVENT. Due to its historical significance, it's almost certain that it would...
Click to read more »no lasting coverage to satisfy WP:SPORTSEVENT. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 12:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC) WP:SPORTSEVENT is primarily referring to sports leagues...
Click to read more »14 January 2012 (UTC) Delete Routine sports coverage that fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Papaursa (talk) 17:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »consensus has shown these type of articles are not notable and fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2011 (UTC) Delete Regional MMA promotions...
Click to read more »best.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC) Delete fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as the article lacks "well sourced prose" and is "merely a list of stats"...
Click to read more »release) fails to establish any significance of this routine game per WP:SPORTSEVENT. Everything here that's worth including can be (and already is) mentioned...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. International tournaments from two second tier teams are not notable...
Click to read more »entries and miscellaneous minor sites. This article fails WP:GNG & WP:SPORTSEVENT. Enfcer (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2011 (UTC) Delete. Same reasons as...
Click to read more »19:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Delete definitely bottom tier, Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 11:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable as above...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT; searches of the Montenegrin name are not returning any useful results...
Click to read more »is not a stat book. Even notable articles about sports topics (per WP:SPORTSEVENT) should have well-sourced prose, not merely a list of stats. This has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. This is strictly a local event without any SIGCOV on its own. Rogermx...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Supported by no reliable sources. BullDawg2021 (talk) 20:24, 16 March...
Click to read more »August 2011 (UTC) *Merge to David Cone. The game itself seems to fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. The information is better suited to the player's individual page. PaintedCarpet...
Click to read more »sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. There is no direct and in-depth WP:SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 11:56...
Click to read more »than the routine coverage every sporting event gets; fails WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT Mtking (edits) 20:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »October 2012 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, WP:EVENT, and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Qworty (talk) 00:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Keep, and expand to include...
Click to read more »Stalwart111 (talk) 04:01, 15 October 2012 (UTC) Delete - fails Wikipedia:SPORTSEVENT. --Mentoz86 (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »supports notability (i.e. nothing is said about this specifically on WP:SPORTSEVENT). However, it does say this about what a notable series or game is: A...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. No coverage in third party sources. Also nominating: FIBA South America...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MMAEVENT, WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT, the coverage that this "event" received was totally routine in nature...
Click to read more »Papaursa (talk) 18:46, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 15:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:SPORTSEVENT. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- Joaquin008...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unremarkable event. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Merging with the main article could also be a possibility. Sportsfan...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT, nothing in gnews [1] LibStar (talk) 06:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. not even sure if this is even a national competition. in any case no...
Click to read more »Unremarkable event. The article also relies on one reference. Also fails WP:SPORTSEVENT Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC) The guideline is talking...
Click to read more »but the original reason still stands: Appears to fail WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT. I have been unable to locate significant reliable source coverage to...
Click to read more »local coverage [1] [2] but lacks the coverage required for WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Also nominating: 2018 Duhallow Junior A Hurling Championship (edit |...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT; coverage presented in the article and that found in a search is little...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT in the clause "game that is widely considered by independent reliable...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unremarkable event. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Merging with the main article could also be a possibility. Sportsfan...
Click to read more »Night Football. PAVA11 (talk) 01:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT (Was trying to find this previously but couldn't at the time.) PAVA11...
Click to read more »such as basketball. Also barely anything in Google News. WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT do not appear to be met. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:18, 12 August 2021...
Click to read more »with nom. The coverage I see doesn't show this event is notable (see WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:ROUTINE). Astudent0 (talk) 23:47, 20 August 2012 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »result was Delete - As has been discussed below, the article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »consider a merge instead, which is actually recommended as a course by WP:SPORTSEVENT. I'm not sure what to do with the earlier ones. Should we delete or merge...
Click to read more »standalone articles for UFC events at which titles are defended, per WP:SPORTSEVENT, since they determine the champion of a top league, which I consider...
Click to read more »Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2012 (UTC) delete fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 14:46, 4 February 2012 (UTC) Delete per nominator. No...
Click to read more »functionally meaning its enduring notability is in question per WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Despite large quantity of sources for the result, coverage is routine...
Click to read more »regular season college football games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »another sprawling series of kickboxing results that fails WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT. those voting keep all must show evidence of third party coverage for...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT for lack of third party coverage. Only primary sources provided. LibStar...
Click to read more »in professional and college leagues are not inherently notable." WP:SPORTSEVENT Alans1977 (talk) 01:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC) Comment Since nominating the...
Click to read more »Just a results listing and a list of non notable athletes. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »indicates a failure to meet both WP:EVENT and by similar reasoning WP:SPORTSEVENT as well as WP:ROUTINE. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:40, 4 May 2012...
Click to read more »and fail WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Mdtemp (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC) Keep all per WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT as these are major events...
Click to read more »of then-current F1 drivers, all but one of whom are notable. Per WP:SPORTSEVENT some games and series are inherently notable, which I am sure includes...
Click to read more »Delete: If you're looking for an applicable guideline, Hergilei, try WP:SPORTSEVENT. All the sources are primary, there's no evidence this event meets the...
Click to read more »not find any indepth coverage in third party sources to meet GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 00:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC) Delete: not notable.Nocturnal781...
Click to read more »significance and no major titles were awarded--thus failing WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT. I am also nominating the following related page because it hasn't happened...
Click to read more »highest international level and almost no significant coverage. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT Ajf773 (talk) 11:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as the only coverage I can find is WP:ROUTINE fight announcements and...
Click to read more »3 April 2021 (UTC) Delete - on evidence available, does not meet WP:SPORTSEVENT or WP:GNG Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) clearly fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and no long standing notability to meet WP:EVENT. Those wanting to keep...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unremarkable event. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Merging with the main article could also be a possibility. Sportsfan...
Click to read more »Has received very limited coverage, mostly in lesser sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. - MrX 19:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and more generally WP:EVENT. a non notable fighting event only covered...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT in the clause "game that is widely considered by independent reliable...
Click to read more »how this "High School holiday basketball tournament" meets GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 00:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Olympic basketball team#Nigeria. Lacks the enduring notability to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT, with mostly WP:ROUTINE coverage. Moreover per WP:N: "This is not a guarantee...
Click to read more »We should only have articles on sports events that meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:32, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. - MrX 11:49, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Keep - Does not fail sportsevent as it is an ongoing season, not a single...
Click to read more »SCHOOL sports rivalry that fails the specific notability guidelines of WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NRIVALRY, as well as the general notability guidelines of WP:GNG...
Click to read more »Commonwealth Youth Games. No independent notability under WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »none of the teams have any notability WP:NOTINHERETED. Does not pass WP:SPORTSEVENT Ajf773 (talk) 09:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT for lack of significant independent coverage in reliable sources. - MrX...
Click to read more »WP:ROUTINE coverage and nowhere near enough to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT to any degree. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »championship. Smartyllama (talk) 01:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC) Delete all per WP:SPORTSEVENT. Individual notability per country is not inhereted just because the...
Click to read more »SCHOOL sports rivalry. Fails the specific notability guidelines of WP:SPORTSEVENT, as well as the general notability guidelines of WP:GNG. As editors who...
Click to read more »event. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC) Delete all. WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NOTINHERETED. Ajf773 (talk) 08:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »fails WP:FUTURE, a whole range of WP notability guidelines (WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT). It is currently only sourced to either to UFC's own...
Click to read more »This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate...
Click to read more »Like the other K-1 stuff. Doesn't meet WP:GNG (good sources), or WP:SPORTSEVENT (particular importance) MadCow257 (talk) 23:27, 16 August 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »7 January 2017 (UTC) Delete Entire group as no notability under WP:SPORTSEVENT or under WP:GNG. Note: I also nominated the navbox template for these...
Click to read more »The event articles are merely listing of fight results, failing WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:ROUTINE. Papaursa (talk) 04:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Has received very limited coverage, mostly in lesser sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. - MrX 19:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This article does not credibly assert notability as a WP:SPORTSEVENT; it's a U-16 qualifier series. As a WP:EVENT, it similarly appears to...
Click to read more »II K-1 World Grand Prix 2006 in Sapporo here we go again. all fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. mere qualifying events. LibStar (talk) 23:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »23:30, 1 November 2011 (UTC) Delete all None of these event pass WP:SPORTSEVENT. Astudent0 (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2011 (UTC) Delete all I agree with...
Click to read more »Australia. Vestrian24Bio 03:32, 7 March 2025 (UTC) *Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. WP:NOTINHERITED applies to people not sports events. LibStar (talk)...
Click to read more »notability. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 17:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Delete fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 11:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »is no evidence of notability here. Fails WP:GNG and looks to fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC) Well, so this is...
Click to read more »coverage. Even a plain google search just reveals primary sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 05:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT, the only source older than than 24 hrs after the event is an unofficial...
Click to read more »another useless of sporting results with no third party coverage. fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »significant coverage from independent sources. Does not appear to pass WP:SPORTSEVENT or WP:GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:26, 28 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:N, no WP:SIGCOV for GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT // Timothy :: talk 00:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Delete No cited sources...
Click to read more »and tabloid journalism are not sufficient basis for an article." WP:SPORTSEVENT - I won't copy the whole thing in, but read it And thank you for digging...
Click to read more »useless series of results of events to qualify for other events. fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. those wanting to keep must show evidence of third party coverage. LibStar...
Click to read more »6 March 2014 (UTC) Weak Delete The article doesn't seem to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT or WP:NRIVALRY. But that is mostly a lack of sources, not inherent non-notability...
Click to read more »Has received very limited coverage, mostly in lesser sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. - MrX 18:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »regular season college football games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »coverage from independent sources, so does not look to pass WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. Would have given this a PROD but creator has a history of contesting...
Click to read more »hasn't happened yet and there's nothing to show this event satisfies WP:SPORTSEVENT or that the coverage is (or will be) anything but WP:ROUTINE. Papaursa...
Click to read more »notability for this particular edition of the tournament to pass WP:SPORTSEVENT or the wider WP:GNG. One issue with a merge that I would also have is...
Click to read more »way. Fenix down (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - per WP:SPORTSEVENT (and possibly some other policy) - an individual match is usually not...
Click to read more »a results listing with only sources being primary. Fails GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 03:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Has received very limited coverage, mostly in lesser sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. - MrX 19:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. I was only able to find a single independent source. - MrX 10:59, 30...
Click to read more »actually happened) fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate...
Click to read more »independent and reliable sources. No real claim to passing either WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:43, 28 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »by other articles. Govvy (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC) Per WP:SPORTSEVENT, every World Cup match is not inherently notable without significant...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. no evidence of third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 09:56, 11 October...
Click to read more »World Tournament 2006 Shoot Boxing World Tournament 2008 All fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. Those wanting to keep must show long standing coverage. LibStar (talk)...
Click to read more »enough from established WP:RS to show a clear passing of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT, which requires more than just routine announcements of the event. I...
Click to read more »governing body" and "has little organization", and I cannot see that WP:SPORTSEVENT is met. I'm sure it is great fun for everybody involved, but of the many...
Click to read more »Germany another useless sprawling series of sports results that fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. no evidence of long term notability after 10 years. LibStar (talk) 07:43...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) blatantly fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. when you have U-17 teams competing you can guarantee no notability....
Click to read more »that are actually independent of the EAFF to show that WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT are met. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »delete the organization It's clear the event fails WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT. There may well be reliable sources in that mess of google hits for the...
Click to read more »SCHOOL sports rivalry. Fails the specific notability guidelines of WP:SPORTSEVENT, as well as the general notability guidelines of WP:GNG. As any editor...
Click to read more »convinced that cricket internationals in general somehow are exempt from WP:SPORTSEVENT because they are organised with two or three matches in a row usually...
Click to read more »Paralympiakos (talk) 20:11, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Delete as per WP:SPORTSEVENT. The current state of the article is that it does not "have well-sourced...
Click to read more »of them in independent sources. No indication of passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. Even most senior finals don't warrant articles of their own so I don't...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article doesn't appear to comply with WP:SPORTSEVENT. The one and only source that it does have doesn't even verify the content...
Click to read more »07:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC) Delete all None of these events meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. Mdtemp (talk) 17:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Keep I found a notability guideline for single games at WP:SPORTSEVENT, and this match seems to be between 2 champions (the champion of the...
Click to read more »sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting...
Click to read more »WP:ROUTINE coverage, fails to establish any significance of this game per WP:SPORTSEVENT. Everything here that's worth including should be summarized at Texas...
Click to read more »notability. // Timothy :: talk 18:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC) Delete fails WP:SPORTSEVENT based on Timothy's excellent analysis above. LibStar (talk) 01:26, 31...
Click to read more »results listing. Only coverage seems to be in Perthnow. but fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 03:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »2011 Green Property Mens Irish Open – Doubles - fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC) I've decided to give...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Just a results listing based on primary sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 04:20, 23 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »regular season college football games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete Individual games are inherently not notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT. No WP:SUSTAINED coverage. No content to merge, as it's primarily WP:OR...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An inter school cricket competition that fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Similar AfD is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPA Cup (2nd nomination)...
Click to read more »independent. Therefore this article fails WP:GNG and doesn't pass WP:SPORTSEVENT. I'm happy with a general redirect if a good target is found. SportingFlyer...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and SPORTSEVENT. Article is basically a score card. The Redlinks in this article shows...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »Has received very limited coverage, mostly in lesser sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. - MrX 18:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »sources and give no reasons why the events are notable, clearly failing WP:SPORTSEVENT. Jakejr (talk) 18:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC) Delete None of the articles...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »another non notable series of fighting qualifying results that fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. keep voters must provide evidence of third party coverage. LibStar (talk)...
Click to read more »Caribbean. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. A competition of 4 non notable teams. LibStar (talk) 04:04, 25 July...
Click to read more »05:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC) Delete. This appears to clearly fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. The relevant criteria states that notable games should be widely considered...
Click to read more »regular season college football games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must satisfy the general notability guidelines...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as a non notable individual event. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2012...
Click to read more »coverage. Even a plain google search just reveals primary sources. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »considered by independent reliable sources to be notable, and fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »that the "Mens National League Division 1" meets WP:GNG, WP:NORG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. There is almost zero coverage of the league at all. And the very little...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT, Just a results listings of an under 16 competition. No appropriate redirect...
Click to read more »Thanks, -- Dane talk 07:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC) Keep All. Passes WP:SPORTSEVENT. Junior world championship by BWF is certainly a notable sports event...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete it gets some coverage but predominantly local. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Having notable winners helps with notability, which there are none....
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. the world under 17s may be notable but a regional competition not so...
Click to read more »events, updated through 2021. I don't know how people have interpreted WP:SPORTSEVENT, but my first impression is that this is a really lonely article, and...
Click to read more »in professional and college leagues are not inherently notable." WP:SPORTSEVENT Alans1977 (talk) 09:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC) Comment can nominees please...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »article. Franco98silva (talk) 21:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. The other years' events should be deleted too. LibStar (talk) 03:06...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Sources do not provide independent WP:SIGCOV. Unable to locate sources...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. The CNN link would be reliable but links to the general CNN travel website...
Click to read more »series of qualifying results with no third party coverage to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC) LibStar Note: This debate...
Click to read more »regular season college football games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT for "Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose, not...
Click to read more »fails WP:GNG. Vestrian24Bio 16:16, 23 August 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 02:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC) Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, the article is about Israel's failed qualification campaign, not their...
Click to read more »success in the tournament made big news and definitely meets WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. - GalatzTalk 13:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »suggestion is to delete the article for failing WP:V, WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »as it only happened yesterday. If this does somehow pass WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT and qualifies for a stand-alone article, then it should be moved to 2026...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »youth tournament which do not establish notability. Does not pass WP:SPORTSEVENT. New source assessment to follow. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:48, 20...
Click to read more »season Geschichte (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 23:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC) Not opposed to a redirect...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT, no third party coverage and is basically a results listing. Also nominating...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as it's not the final series (or single game when there is not a series)...
Click to read more »notability, almost all participants are non notable. no way meets WP:SPORTSEVENT... in fact women's kickboxing gets next to nil third party coverage....
Click to read more »sport events are notable, these aren't. Can you cite reasons? Per WP:SPORTSEVENT "consider developing the topic in the existing article first until it...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This MMA event fails WP:MMAEVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT, the coverage it has received is routine in nature (consisting of the...
Click to read more »then the article should be deleted or redirected to another article. WP:SPORTSEVENT also goes on to say that news coverage should be extensive (e.g., outside...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This article does not credibly assert notability as a WP:SPORTSEVENT; it's a "Youth championship" qualifier series. As a WP:EVENT, it similarly...
Click to read more »summary within the existing Florida–LSU football rivalry article. Per WP:SPORTSEVENT, "[r]egular season games in professional and college leagues are not...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NOTSTATS, as far as I can tell. No evidence of notability beyond...
Click to read more »there are ones in the article which may be a little past WP:ROUTINE. WP:SPORTSEVENT says The final series (or single game when there is not a series) determining...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »major as those at List of people banned or suspended by the NBA. Per WP:SPORTSEVENT, a single game is generally not notable. As a single event, this fails...
Click to read more »seasons do not. Aspirex (talk) 22:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. All the sources provided are primary. Need significant coverage in third...
Click to read more »Keep As the FInals of a major tournament, they satisfy WP:NFOOTY and WP:SPORTSEVENT even if they were cancelled. See also 1946 FIFA World Cup, which was...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This article does not credibly assert notability as a WP:SPORTSEVENT; it's a "Youth championship" qualifier series. As an WP:EVENT, it similarly...
Click to read more »Thanks, asilvering (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 05:08, 26 June 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:SPORTSEVENT: "games should be extraordinary and have a lasting impact on the sport"...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This article does not credibly assert notability as a WP:SPORTSEVENT; it's a "Youth championship" qualifier series. As an WP:EVENT, it similarly...
Click to read more »fails WP:FUTURE, a whole range of WP notability guidelines (WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT). It is currently only sourced to either to UFC's own...
Click to read more »to show these events have anything but WP:ROUTINE coverage or pass WP:SPORTSEVENT. Mdtemp (talk) 14:58, 26 July 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Thanks, asilvering (talk) 01:23, 20 June 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 05:09, 26 June 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »2025 Games of the Small States of Europe, otherwise I think it fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Smallangryplanet (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC) Keep Per WP:SPORTSEVENT, this is headlined by a championship contest at the highest level of...
Click to read more »pre-season match that doesn't appear to have enough coverage to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »(edits) 21:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC) This is not routine coverage. See WP:SPORTSEVENT. These were broadcast nationwide to millions in prime time (again, TBS...
Click to read more »times in 70 years. Second, the series is not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT because it is not a championship, bowl game or all-star game, nor does...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »routine fight results and lacks well-sourced prose as requested by WP:SPORTSEVENT to discuss the notability of the event. --TreyGeek (talk) 16:07, 19 May...
Click to read more »SCHOOL sports rivalry that fails the specific notability guidelines of WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NRIVALRY, as well as the general notability guidelines of WP:GNG...
Click to read more »Pesky (talk …stalk!) 11:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC) DeleteMerge per WP:SPORTSEVENT, WP:ROUTINE and also per WP:NSPORTS#Individual seasons which says "Wikipedia...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Could not find any third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 4 May...
Click to read more »regular season college football games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. International tournaments from two second tier teams are not notable...
Click to read more »Clearly no need for a separate article; the relevant guideline is WP:SPORTSEVENT. I say delete rather than merge this because it seems like most if not...
Click to read more »regular season college football games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must satisfy the general notability guidelines...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) as per WP:SPORTSEVENT. WP:SPORTSEVENT deems the final series to determine the top champion of a top...
Click to read more »functionally meaning its enduring notability is in question per WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT. The notability of this event appears to be tied to the largest defeat...
Click to read more »fail. The article contains no well-sourced prose, as requested by WP:SPORTSEVENT, and contains only routine fight results. --TreyGeek (talk) 16:13, 19...
Click to read more »there already is a brief synopsis of this game. Further, this fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as it's not the final game, it was part of the final series, and there...
Click to read more »article on a set of friendly matches that makes no claim to passing WP:SPORTSEVENT and has no evidence of meeting WP:GNG. When this was draftified, this...
Click to read more »itself. Professional competition at the highest level that meets WP:SPORTSEVENT is considered notable. For example, the K-1 World Grand Prix is notable...
Click to read more »a lot of the sources used were from routine coverage of the game (WP:SPORTSEVENT), which doesn't show notability. Responding to your comment about records...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT, all but 1 of the supplied sources are primary from the event organiser...
Click to read more »redirect to League of Legends Championship Pacific (LCP) per WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. This tournament is a qualifier for a promotion series to a primary league...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP:NOTSTATS and WP:CFORK, and, judging by the lack of sources, WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT as well. But you're oversimplifying the consensus as well. It really...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC) Keep As par WP:GNG, WP:MMAEVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:EVENT. Both events meet these policies an for the SFL 1 page to...
Click to read more »or WTA -- so it does not meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 16:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC) Per Wikipedia:SPORTSEVENT#Tennis, if there was some tennis player...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any...
Click to read more »WP:GNG. The article contains no well-sourced prose, as requested by WP:SPORTSEVENT, and contains only routine coverage of fight results. --TreyGeek (talk)...
Click to read more »Peter Rehse (talk) 03:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC) strong delete all fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 05:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC) Delete all Pretty much per...
Click to read more »lack significant coverage and fall under WP:ROUTINE. They also fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. With better sources the articles on the organizations might be salvageable...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT. The page is unsourced, the "tournament" is a minor invitational friendlies...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »topic actually should not have a stand-alone article". 2. WP:NSPORTS/WP:SPORTSEVENT: "Regular season games in professional and college leagues are not inherently...
Click to read more »with a lot of stats, referenced to a primary source. Appears to fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. - MrX 20:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Keep - What about: 2001 Gelsor Open...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This regular season game is not notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT. There at least a couple dozen games of similar stature every season...
Click to read more »discussions. Vestrian24Bio 10:56, 2 November 2025 (UTC) Delete both Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT for lack of third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2025...
Click to read more »teams' seasons like The Comeback playoff game. On the other hand, per WP:SPORTSEVENT, individual games can have articles if they're mentioned outside of routine...
Click to read more »assertions that the series has "significant coverage". If you refer to WP:SPORTSEVENT, under bullet point No. 4 it makes reference to determining notability...
Click to read more »may be so, but, unfortunately, the article still needs to satisfy WP:SPORTSEVENT. Regards, RJH (talk) 18:37, 1 August 2011 (UTC) Why is the information...
Click to read more »received world-wide coverage is clearly notable and I would argue meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. -- KTC (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2012 (UTC) Note - I would argue the multiple...
Click to read more »notable MMA event, no lasting historical significance, fails WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, WP:MMAEVENT, WP:ROUTINE Mtking (edits) 10:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:31, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Delete - the proper policy here is WP:SPORTSEVENT as WP:NSEASONS is only for teams and not competitions, and it fails this...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »FuriouslySerene (talk) 00:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Delete all per WP:SPORTSEVENT. Events not at elite level (school level particularly) are generally...
Click to read more »Since i already add some references its already meet WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Now you talk about unencyclopedic and bordering on advertisement. I...
Click to read more »2012 in UFC events. The article contains no prose as requested by WP:SPORTSEVENT. It lacks diverse sources citing no non-MMA sources. The article pretty...
Click to read more »season college football kickoff games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must generally satisfy the general notability...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »TWL) A local competition which does not appear to pass WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSEVENT. I'm more than happy to be proved wrong here but a BEFORE search didn't...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »TWL) One sentence, one source article with a lot of stats. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. The content can be summarized on the main article. - MrX 11:46, 1 August...
Click to read more »the established practice, see Dirtlawyer1 and others' discussion of WP:SPORTSEVENT and related policies at the following similar AfDs (all closed as delete):...
Click to read more »This is a just results listing of very minor teams playing. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. No mainstream coverage. LibStar (talk) 06:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »inherently notable, and must satisfy the specific notability guidelines of WP:SPORTSEVENT, WP:EVENT or WP:GNG. In all events, a subjective "highlights" game list...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:SPORTSEVENT, individual games are generally better "in an existing article on a broader...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 Spanish Figure Skating Championships. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Also nominating: 2002 Spanish Figure Skating Championships 2001 Spanish...
Click to read more »sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate what if any...
Click to read more »Championships 2007 German Finals qualifying events for other events. all fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. no significant coverage to establish WP:PERSISTENCE. LibStar (talk)...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC) Delete all all fail WP:ORG and WP:SPORTSEVENT . LibStar (talk) 13:33, 16 October 2011 (UTC) Keep the company article...
Click to read more »and game summary – the main page is welcome to include that! (see WP:SPORTSEVENT) While Pelé scored a hat trick, he has his own article that mentions...
Click to read more »Baseball Championship. No indication of notability. Fails to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT, WP:GNG. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »criteria and policies (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER WP:MMAEVENT, WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT), with the event not due for another two months, the coverage is totally...
Click to read more »functionally meaning its enduring notability is in question per WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Per the commentary: the actual result itself is in dispute due to poor...
Click to read more »were to delete; most arguments invoked the notability guidelines at WP:SPORTSEVENT, which says that "regular season games in professional and college leagues...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Can't find anything that would allow for a passing of WP:SPORTSEVENT or WP:GNG. Google News and ProQuest returned nothing at all. A normal...
Click to read more »routine coverage of that bout. There is no prose as requested by WP:SPORTSEVENT discussing why this event, and its single bout, is/will be notable. --TreyGeek...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:SPORTSEVENT, individual games are not inherently notable and must generally satisfy...
Click to read more »fails WP:FUTURE, a whole range of WP notability guidelines (WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT). It is currently only sourced to either to UFC's own...
Click to read more »fails WP:FUTURE, a whole range of WP notability guidelines (WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT). It is currently only sourced to either to UFC's own...
Click to read more »sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting...
Click to read more »list. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 00:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 13:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC) Delete: Regular season games...
Click to read more »redirected to 2000 Rugby League World Cup qualifying but reverted. As per WP:SPORTSEVENT: Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose, not merely...
Click to read more »fails the WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:MMAEVENT, WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT notability guidelines, the coverage that this "event" received is totally...
Click to read more »all of those arguments are invalid. - We do have a policy on this, WP:SPORTSEVENT, which is in line with what those requesting these articles be deleted...
Click to read more »01:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC) Delete The topic doesn't seem to match WP:SPORTSEVENT. It clearly states that student competitions are not considered noteworthy...
Click to read more »TWL) Poorly-sourced article about an amateur sporting event. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NOTSTATS. - MrX 15:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »League final of course. Fram (talk) 16:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Delete - WP:SPORTSEVENT allows that finals are almost certainly notable but this strongly implies...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article fails WP:SPORTSEVENTS, most specifically because it is not A game that is widely considered...
Click to read more »Svartner (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2026 (UTC) Redirect – per Reywas92 and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Publicwalrus (talk) 21:34, 5 July 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as "Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose, not...
Click to read more »notable person Any applicable claim listed at WP:EVENTCRITERIA or WP:SPORTSEVENT Even if the article does not contain a claim of significance or importance...
Click to read more »January 2017 (UTC) Delete all. All non-notable sporting events per WP:SPORTSEVENT. Ajf773 (talk) 02:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC) Closing admin should note...
Click to read more »countries and the number of seasons have been played. That's why WP:SPORTSEVENT exists, because wikipedia is not the back page of your local newspaper...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). These articles fail WP:SPORTSEVENT as they are not the final game/series (e.g. a Super Bowl) and there is...
Click to read more »non-MMA media/websites as sources. Thus far the article is failing WP:SPORTSEVENT in that it doesn't have much in the way of "well sourced prose" which...
Click to read more »are league seasons articles not a team seasons ones, so please see WP:SPORTSEVENT not WP:NSEASONS. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC) per...
Click to read more »sources. 194.50.51.252 (talk) 17:27, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Delete. WP:SPORTSEVENT requires that the game is "widely considered by independent reliable...
Click to read more »identical !vote on the first AFD - the relevant guideline here is WP:SPORTSEVENT, while WP:NSEASONS also applies. Both ask for "well-sourced prose" of...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Entirely sourced by primary sources. This is a junior competition of...
Click to read more »WP:SPORTSEVENT"); and Atudent0 ("Delete all This is not a vote and no valid reasons have yet been given for keeping, but WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT are...
Click to read more »May 2026 (UTC) The correctly notability guideline for this would be WP:SPORTSEVENT, and I think your criteria is generally fine for applying to the second...
Click to read more »Sarayuna (talk • contribs) 09:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NOTSTATS. - MrX 12:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC) Keep: Meets notability as per WP:SPORTSEVENT since a title is on the line ("Some games or series are inherently notable...
Click to read more »fight results. There is really no well-sourced prose, as requested by WP:SPORTSEVENT, to establish why this event is/was notable. Appears there may be non-MMA...
Click to read more »had. --Hmich176 (talk) 11:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Delete as per WP:SPORTSEVENT as the article contains virtually no well-sourced prose and is largely...
Click to read more »21:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC) Delete all all unreferenced and fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 09:38, 27 December 2024 (UTC) Delete one source is not...
Click to read more »Seanstrain3001. Individual games can be notable. The relevant guidelines are WP:SPORTSEVENT, WP:NEWSEVENT, and WP:GNG. WP:NOTNEWS emphasizes that being newsworthy...
Click to read more »understand why you are applying WP:NSEASONS to this, this comes under WP:SPORTSEVENT, also is the competition competitive or friendly, and where does it sit...
Click to read more »This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate that there...
Click to read more »prose discussing the notable aspects of the event as requested by WP:SPORTSEVENT. The article currently cites only a single non-MMA related source which...
Click to read more »future UFC events were deleted. Also the article currently fails WP:SPORTSEVENT due to its lack of well-sourced prose; it has practically no prose. I...
Click to read more »notability under the more specific game notability guidelines of WP:SPORTSEVENT, nor does it appear to satisfy the applicable guidelines of WP:NEVENT...
Click to read more »Presents: Sengoku 3 World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku 1 all fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. routine non notable sporting results. LibStar (talk) 05:59, 28 September...
Click to read more »considered by independent reliable sources to be notable, and passes WP:SPORTSEVENT. --Mentoz86 (talk) 08:59, 18 October 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability per WP:SPORTSEVENT or WP:GNG. I moved the first unreferenced version to draft yesterday...
Click to read more »the tournament, it's worth a merge. Creatively interpreting that WP:SPORTSEVENT applies to esports, which seems to import a high standard: [individual]...
Click to read more »article. However, Glendale we have a problem. Have a look here: >WP:SPORTSEVENT<. Just looking at the article briefly, you might be able to meet notability...
Click to read more »strong (or even correct) vote but the picture painted by WP:NGAELIC, WP:SPORTSEVENT and Wikipedia:Notability (sports) is all so confusing that any sports...
Click to read more »case of WP:CONTENTFORK. Furthermore, these standalone pages fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:SIGCOV to satisfy WP:GNG. An earlier attempt to redirect these...
Click to read more »based on the general and specific notability guidelines - WP:N and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Have you read them and what do you think? --hippo43 (talk) 14:40, 13...
Click to read more »pre-season friendly match gets. Better coverage may well exist in Bengali. WP:SPORTSEVENT is quite a high bar for notability with the guideline stating that news...
Click to read more »fails WP:FUTURE, a whole range of WP notability guidelines (WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT). It is currently only sourced to either to UFC's own...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. While an extraordinary scoreline given the circumstances in my (admittedly...
Click to read more »itself. Professional competition at the highest level that meets WP:SPORTSEVENT is considered notable. Local Lethwei competitions or amateur competitions...
Click to read more »fails WP:FUTURE, a whole range of WP notability guidelines (WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT). It is currently only sourced to either to UFC's own...
Click to read more »including college bowl games, have a presumption of notability per WP:SPORTSEVENT. Regular season games do not. Yes, regular season games may be notable...
Click to read more »fail of WP:GNG. The article lacks well-sourced prose as requested by WP:SPORTSEVENT to discuss why the event is notable. It contains only routine fight card...
Click to read more »event fails a whole range of WP notability guidelines (WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT). It is currently only sourced to either to UFC's own...
Click to read more »deletion by other editors, I'm just making a formal nomination. It fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as it's not the final series (or single game when there is not a series)...
Click to read more »topic actually should not have a stand-alone article". 2. WP:NSPORTS/WP:SPORTSEVENT: "Regular season games in professional and college leagues are not inherently...
Click to read more »I) argued with WP:SIGCOV or WP:NOTMIRROR. In the AFDs I also found WP:SPORTSEVENT which says: Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose...
Click to read more »and tabloid journalism are not sufficient basis for an article." WP:SPORTSEVENT - I won't copy the whole thing in, but read it And thank you for digging...
Click to read more »notability requirements of both WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT. In assessing whether this event meets WP:SPORTSEVENT it is useful to note that a UFC card...
Click to read more »substantial press coverage. SportingFlyer talk 04:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC) WP:SPORTSEVENT is the SNG I was looking for, and this doesn't come close to meeting...
Click to read more »news reporting. The guideline for notability of sporting matches is WP:SPORTSEVENT. That doesn't mention cricket but the examples given imply that ordinary...
Click to read more »SCHOOL sports rivalry that fails the specific notability guidelines of WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NRIVALRY, as well as the general notability guidelines of WP:GNG...
Click to read more »20 July 2025 (UTC) Keep - unambiguously meets GNG, not to mention WP:SPORTSEVENT. —Rutebega (talk) 18:18, 20 July 2025 (UTC) I'm not a tennis fan, but...
Click to read more »season football games, see Dirtlawyer1 and others' discussion of WP:SPORTSEVENT and related policies at the following similar AfDs (all closed as delete):...
Click to read more »LibStar (talk) 23:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC) Delete All. Topics fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. These preliminary events are not inherently notable as sports events...
Click to read more »are both excessive detail for an event that doesn't in itself pass WP:SPORTSEVENT. No opposition to selectively merging a couple of sentences, maybe, but...
Click to read more »the article with the rest of the season rather than separately: per WP:SPORTSEVENT, "consider developing the topic in the existing article first until it...
Click to read more »19:00, 10 September 2025 (UTC) Keep it is not a stretch to apply WP:SPORTSEVENT, as both NFC and AFC Championship games determine the winner of a major...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT for "Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose, not...
Click to read more »Delete The article appears to simply be WP:ROUTINE coverage of an MMA WP:SPORTSEVENT, contains only stats and fight results and practically no prose to make...
Click to read more »WP:Notability (sports) has little historical perspective (although WP:SPORTSEVENT does seem to be met) and that WP:NFOOTY restricts itself to personalities...
Click to read more »Harry Maguire scored an own goal, and England won. Water is wet. WP:SPORTSEVENT, in particular "For a game or series that is already covered as a subtopic...
Click to read more »each individual event has to meet notability criteria and as per WP:SPORTSEVENT "For a games or series that is already covered as a subtopic in another...
Click to read more »clearly lasting. SportingFlyer T·C 10:59, 25 January 2026 (UTC) As per WP:SPORTSEVENT: "Although a game or series may be notable, it may sometimes be better...
Click to read more »