This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
influence over Hong Kong post-2020. 1 Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) WP:SPLC 📌 2025 +21 2025 The Southern Poverty Law Center is considered generally...
Click to read more »fringe science are represented in Wikipedia. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) recently reported on the "Wikipedia wars" in which they say fringe views...
Click to read more »Propose deleting Category:Organizations designated as hate groups by the SPLC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: I think...
Click to read more »policy. Some editors have questioned the reliability of the SPLC on non-United States topics. SPLC classifications should not automatically be included in...
Click to read more »an external link to the main SPLC article. Instaurare (talk) 01:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Keep – The groups on the SPLC's list are often brought up by...
Click to read more »478#Question about Hatewatch and the SPLC for WP:RFCBEFORE. Please also see this search for discussions involving SPLC. TarnishedPathtalk 11:12, 24 May 2025...
Click to read more »was part of campaign spin, and never attested by any other study than the SPLC's admittedly anecdotal evidence. Ephemeral notability + attack page = Delete...
Click to read more »herself with the sole exception of the SPLC citation — and the problem with the SPLC reference isn't that the SPLC are "hatemongers" (which is not a claim...
Click to read more »group. I would rather not be sidetracked into a discussion of whether the SPLC is reliable on other topics. That discussion may be worth having, but this...
Click to read more »discussing SPLC's list). Chen 2006 (SPLC and ADL are authoritative sources for identifying domestic extremists and hate groups") Perry 2001 (SPLC provides...
Click to read more »reporter prior to this position; he did not found the SPLC, and is simply someone who presents SPLC information to the nation and the world. The article's...
Click to read more »the SPLC does not seem laughable. TFD (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC) Using the SPLC as a source in a discussion about the reliability of the SPLC as...
Click to read more »Conservative Flagged on SPLC "Hatewatch" List. King of Fearmongers. Hateful speech on hate groups. SPLC Won’t Label Antifa a Hate Group: To the SPLC, targeting conservatives...
Click to read more »evidence has been presented that the church is notable, other than it being on SPLC's hit hate list. I don't think it is. Actions of a church member are not relevant...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I only see coverage from advocacy groups (ADL and SPLC) and advocacy press (antifascistnews.net) which seem insufficient for controversial...
Click to read more »reason to mention the SPLC in line or even to use the SPLC as a source. We wouldn't write for example, "According to the SPLC, "Elizabeth Warren is a...
Click to read more »just don't like the SPLC. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Delete Whatever the merits and bonafides of the SPLC, this is categorisation...
Click to read more »No its all POV, SPLC Hates "Hate Groups" thus this mean of course one can spin it into a dozen bad directions. Its one thing to SPLC say group "A" is...
Click to read more »Minnesota Twin Cities area. Article is here purely as a coatrack to cover it's SPLC "hate group" listing. Belchfire-TALK 03:12, 9 September 2012 (UTC) Strong...
Click to read more »August 29 and all his edits have been to SPLC and other users' talkpages. LuckyWikipedian's first edit to SPLC was adding a section about a gunman who...
Click to read more »came from the SPLC website, with the other ref from the Associated Press (MSNBC) - a copy of which I found on NBC [4]. Only the multiple SPLC refs and the...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete – Other than a couple of news stories and the 5 year old SPLC listing, there is nothing notable about this defunct organization. – S. Rich...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was redirect to Mises Caucus. The SPLC source is roughly acceptable and the Reason video is of rather high quality...
Click to read more »designated by SPLC, has grown by 8%." feminist (talk) 01:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC) Your comment is objectively false. SPLC is NOT reliable. SPLC lost a very...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Failed PROD, but I believe this is worth discussing. Yes, SPLC, ADL, and other advocacy groups cover this in-depth and are reliable sources...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Comment. SPLC gives a fair amount of coverage to the theory here; other reliable coverage...
Click to read more »reliable source that reports on Rightpedia in depth, aside from the two SPLC articles which are equally, if not more about Wikipedia/WMF's policies. This...
Click to read more »significantly satisfy WP:UNDUE. The SPLC may be respected on many matters, but they also have received criticism. The SPLC's reputation has come from dealing...
Click to read more »substitute of the SPLC. Consensus seems to also show that we should not label every group that is classified as a hate group by the SPLC in the lead, if...
Click to read more »The SPLC is the antithesis of a reliable source for anything, and its use to support that anyone is notable I will question long and hard. The SPLC engages...
Click to read more »mentions in the old books are short encyclopedia pieces of dubious quality. SPLC doesn't appear to mention it, only shows photos. Only ref of any substance...
Click to read more »classification on its website, but the SPLC has its own definition, limited to racist neo-pagan groups. The SPLC's definition also seems to be the one used...
Click to read more »ask language questions here. Should you write "SPLC is an organization that opposes bigotry" or "The SPLC is an organization that opposes bigotry"? TIA...
Click to read more »Talk:SPLC regarding the status of Hatewatch and whether it constitutes a different level of reliability than that of the SPLC. WP:SPLC describes the SPLC as...
Click to read more »January 2018 (UTC) Strong delete This reminds me of the rubbish spewed by the SPLC in their fear mongering campaigns, totally ignoring size and impact and real...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This topic is currently sourced only to primary sources. Even the SPLC source only quotes Pierce's essay on the subject. Whilst there are plenty...
Click to read more »registrar. This is what the articles from the SPLC, Seattle Times (local company), Vice, BBC are about. The SPLC has a single article on the company, zero...
Click to read more »The SPLC is certainly a reliable source for whom the SPLC classifies as hate groups. The real issue is WP:WEIGHT - how important is it that the SPLC has...
Click to read more »basis for a section on his views and as evidence for notability: Salon, SPLC, Raw Story, Washington Spectator (that one republished in Newsweek). I wouldn't...
Click to read more »The Barnes Review Volume 9 from 2003, but since they are described by the SPLC as "one of the most virulent anti-Semitic organizations around" and "dedicated...
Click to read more »fighting the "post-fact universe" by discrediting years of research by SPLC who found that AIM is right-wing biased. Anarcho-authoritarian (talk) 18:20...
Click to read more »UPI, The Nation, and MSNBC are certainly mainstream. Calling the ADL and SPLC "racist orgainzations" is a bit much. The article is well-sourced and reasonably...
Click to read more »January 2018 (UTC) delete I'm not convinced that simply getting listed by the SPLC is enough notoriety, and while appears that Phelps's book has a better claim...
Click to read more »Delaware-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Delete the SPLC is not a realible source. They are notorious for engaging in inflamatory...
Click to read more »The SPLC is a political advocacy group that has been often discredited. Its use on the UDC page is inappropriate and should be removed. Further discussion...
Click to read more »not to publicize the SPLC's listings. Mangoe (talk) 03:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC) I'm not working or interested in promoting SPLC, however, they do seem...
Click to read more »notability. Together with the details on his life and work provided by the SPLC which enable us to source an article, descriptors like "popular" in RS publications...
Click to read more »$GROUP is a hate group,<ref>SPLC page calling $GROUP a hate group</ref> WRONG: SPLC classifies $GROUP as a hate group,<ref>SPLC page calling $GROUP a hate...
Click to read more »from the "Southern Poverty Law Center" (SPLC), followed by several paragraphs criticizing the SPLC. The SPLC called the Mises institute "Neo Confederate"...
Click to read more »articles at ABC News, the NY Daily News, the Telegraph, the ADL and the SPLC, among others. We may not like them, but they're notable. Station1 (talk)...
Click to read more »called Lancaster Unity. --Dezidor (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC) If the SPLC's outrageously false allegations against me are to be included, then it is...
Click to read more »specific monitor org is not reliable, or significant, unlike the ADL or SPLC or w/e), or passing mentions. The only reliable source here that actually...
Click to read more »case, WP:BLP1E Sources 1, 5, 9, 13, 20, 21, 22 - not sigcov Sources 4, 24 - SPLC (sigcov but usually not usable without attribution and therefore cannot count...
Click to read more »Jason from nyc (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC) The only source is the SPLC which is a reliable source (several discussions on this, all agree that it...
Click to read more »Anti-Hate Network, an NGO supported by the Canadian government and by the SPLC. As the nominator states, he also received significant coverage for the Twitter...
Click to read more »[39], another claim that a Confederacy-related article is a "subpage of the SPLC (southern poverty law center)". [40], [41], issuing sock puppet warnings...
Click to read more »Various neo-Confederate organizations are designated as hate groups by the SPLC, while the Confederate battle flag is designated as a hate symbol by the...
Click to read more »speaking for the SPLC.[7] He's made other posts on the subject on the SPLC site.[8][9] The Good Men Project thinks he was speaking for the SPLC in that article...
Click to read more »an external link to the main SPLC article. Instaurare (talk) 01:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Keep – The groups on the SPLC's list are often brought up by...
Click to read more »presently has three primary sources and a drop-in advertisement for the SPLC. The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do...
Click to read more »support a biographical article, save an attack piece about him from the SPLC. Thargor Orlando (talk) 21:20, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) says, "We monitor hate groups and other extremists throughout the United States and expose their activities to the...
Click to read more »2 December 2019 (UTC) Delete I have to admit I am sick and tired of the SPLC being treated as a reliable source, when it throws around the label of "hate"...
Click to read more »[[1]][[2]][[3]] where they removed critical reliable sources such as the SPLC from the article. Now, a new and previously uninvolved unregistered user...
Click to read more »supporting the reason and not just labeled "Hate Group" because SPLC says they are. But if SPLC states the reason(s) and that can be verified, then I don't...
Click to read more »surprised there isn't more. Mercer is mentioned in this article from the SPLC and this article from Slate, and this one from the Baffler. If the article...
Click to read more »since late 2012 and I couldn't find any substantial coverage of it. The SPLC wrote about it in 2001, describing it as a "tiny" group with a website. Stormfront...
Click to read more »their Telegram, Bitchute, and Instagram profiles, along with a listing at SPLC: https://www.splcenter.org/states/texas . This does not establish notability...
Click to read more »organization is not notable, 2) Liberal Blogs are not reliable sources. 3) SPLC is not a reliable source, they call all conservative organizations hate groups...
Click to read more »trivial mentions that don't pass "significant." SPLC has identified it as a hate group, but I don't think SPLC sources alone can hold up an article. I also...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Just another racist website. This one is mentioned by the SPLC, but that seems to be their greatest claim to fame. Drmies (talk) 04:38,...
Click to read more »reliable secondary sources. There is some note of him on the ADL [1] [2] and SPLC websites [3] [4], but these are not the best RS and there is still minimal...
Click to read more »(UTC) The SPLC smears political opponents with the racism charge far too often for my liking. Unless this particular allegation by the SPLC has been picked...
Click to read more »the SPLC lists them as a hate group they do not provide any information about them. TFD (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC) Delete trivial mention by SPLC. Not...
Click to read more »8 November 2006 (UTC) Keep. A further indication of notability is that SPLC thinks he's worth denouncing. JamesMLane t c 08:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »some obscure websites. The only secondary sources are two brief mentions in SPLC articles. Google News and Proquest news archive have nothing on him. Based...
Click to read more »have an historian that contradicts the SPLC and the ADL, then I'd not likely ascribe much WP:DUE weight to the SPLC / ADL history while still retaining that...
Click to read more »group, SPLC, is described in glowingly positive terms like "non-profit Southern Poverty Law Center". This article also largely uses the SPLC as a source...
Click to read more »such as 6 and 7 are very solid. There are also several articles from the SPLC here. Overall, passes GNG. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »in-depth coverage we look for. Being noted as a purveyor of hate by ADL and SPLC is not sufficient grounds for notability. I found nothing on Newspapers.com...
Click to read more »talk 15:10, 19 July 2018 (UTC). Delete Just one example of problems, the SPLC is a fundraising racket that seeks to inflate both the threat and extent...
Click to read more »days of press, so it doesn't qualify as sustained coverage. Knowing the SPLC is taking it seriously is some indication we may see more coverage in the...
Click to read more »65#self-published? WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 232#Is an SPLC report a reliable source for List of Confederate monuments and memorials...
Click to read more »for their politics than their music (including mentions by the ADL [1] and SPLC [2]). So I'd contend that the notability of the band is as much a function...
Click to read more »co-author of The South Was Right!: these books, these news stories, this SPLC report. But I think this collection of dead-enders can be adequately mentioned...
Click to read more »that has not had significant coverage in the press or in reliable sources. SPLC only is quoting someone using it and does not have substantial coverage of...
Click to read more »SPLC says group X is an anti-gay hate group. (SPLC): that groups are generally called (anti-gay) "hate groups" because of X, Y, and Z to produce SPLC...
Click to read more »(UTC) What appeared to be duplicate links to the SPLC and the SRI were actually links to two separate SPLC and SRI articles, respectively; this seems legit...
Click to read more »sentences contain a reference to him. He's not mention as an aside in the SPLC piece. A candidate is not only notable if they win a major office, as per...
Click to read more »Egregious WP:POVFORK. This is not a category of hate group used by the SPLC, so there would need to be some extraordinary sourcing treating this as a...
Click to read more »SPLC has no editorial control makes absolutely no sense. The SPLC is the one who will get sued for libel, should they libel anyone because the SPLC has...
Click to read more »--SalmanZ (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC) Delete considering that the SPLC has been exposed as a high pressure marketing scheme and has been accused...
Click to read more »also, in the case of extremely fringey hate groups, i would argue that splc studies should count as reliable sources. they are often the first to discover...
Click to read more »Dictionary: #1, #2 TheSmokingGun.com: #1 Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC): #1, #2, #3 SPLC's "Intelligence Report": #1 SourceWatch: #1 Robert Spencer on Islam:...
Click to read more »notoriety during the last riots,this group has already been identified by the SPLC, and his activities doesnt seem that decrease, and could be generator of...
Click to read more »incure prejudice, and lead to shootings of innocent people just like the SPLC hate maps. It is time we stopped allowing liberals to lie about other people...
Click to read more »Indiana's Putnamville Correctional Facility that was investigated[3]. The SPLC is the only source I can find that suggests there is a "Brotherhood" in other...
Click to read more »00:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Weak keep. It did get some coverage by the SPLC ([1], [2]) and similar organizations[3], and it seems to important amongst...
Click to read more »people who might not take on SPLC and its millions might decide to take on Wikipedia for its systematic use of this source. SPLC is similiar to FrontPage...
Click to read more »much on primary sources and sources published by Rhodes. Then there is the SPLC, which is basically a fund-raising racket, that is in no way a reliable source...
Click to read more »about white supremacists.Amyzex (talk) 18:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC) That's the SPLC's job, and I fully support them in it. But it's not our role to create a special...
Click to read more »leftwing sites or by organizations that seek out to identify hate groups (SPLC). If there is wide coverage by numerous reliable sources, it's far far from...
Click to read more »enough for a short article specifically dealing with "Joel's Army", but the SPLC source doesn't say anything about "Kingdom Now theology". MastCell Talk 20:12...
Click to read more »responding to the SPLC attacks on the LVMI [157] - Willmcw deletes criticism of SPLC, adds criticism of LVMI [158] - Willmcw adds more pro-SPLC stuff Also please...
Click to read more »enemies and article does not include sympathetic sources. Some sources like SPLC are inherently unreliable as sources for facts but can be used as sources...
Click to read more »independent reliable sources. The only significant coverage is from the SPLC, here:[1] The article also links to articles from the Washington Post and...
Click to read more »on the Daily Stormer website and that's all the "evidence" the SPLC needed. And the SPLC vigorously stood by its claim for a full year[66], ignoring all...
Click to read more »Other articles edited show similar themes, including SPLC (Faithful Word Baptist Church is an SPLC target) [9], notice of discussion on BLPN [10], question...
Click to read more »book. Moreover, the role of the SPLC and the role of Wikipedia aren't necessarily one and the same; for example, the SPLC might not feel obligated to adhere...
Click to read more »He must not be a very important racist, since I couldn't find him on the SPLC's website. How sad for him--that would have increased his notability somewhat...
Click to read more »20:49, 14 January 2011 (UTC) Delete. He's one of many right-wingers that the SPLC doesn't like (and probably with good cause) but I can't see how he's notable...
Click to read more »discussing the subject in detail, Black supremacy is not. Other the the SPLC, there is little indepth coverage of the subject. Senegambianamestudy (talk)...
Click to read more »one I kept was one that mentioned it was listed as a patriot group by the SPLC, which in itself doesn't extend notability. It's a trivial source, nothing...
Click to read more »accurate picture.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:08, 30 April 2011 (UTC) There was an SPLC Intelligence Report article explicitly about this, and the C-Span source...
Click to read more »138 (talk) 02:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC). Some organization like the ACLU or SPLC might have stats like that about judges. FWIW I was surprised at the notion...
Click to read more »blogs (e.g. DailyKos) or organizations that identify hate groups (e.g. ADL, SPLC). These sources only mention the website in brief blog posts or in off-hand...
Click to read more »Carl, and the London Conference on Intelligence article exists as well (the SPLC source relates to this). The only independent thing here is the OKCupid controversy...
Click to read more »political shift in countries where the majority of the site’s users live." The SPLC cited the article 'Race and intelligence' as an example of the alt-right...
Click to read more »accusing others of antisemitism (which is funny when it comes to these recent SPLC efforts). Oh, you thought Mikemikev, maybe? Seems different to me. Drmies...
Click to read more »for example) or only mention her in passing. She has a profile with the SPLC, but that's not a newspiece. I don't know much about the Independent Political...
Click to read more »reconsidered my vote and wish to change it, for the reason which follows. The SPLC is now being quoted as a reputable source on the Jason Kessler page, to ensure...
Click to read more »August 2022 (UTC) SPLC is an RS for hate groups, but not "as an advocacy group, the SPLC is a biased and opinionated source." Has SPLC designated ALEC as...
Click to read more »constitutes a NPOV. Theredproject (talk) 20:48, 18 July 2015 (UTC) No. The SPLC blog posting is not an "NPOV." It is an attack on Aardweg. In effect, you...
Click to read more »8 August 2013 (UTC) I have serious doubts about the SPLC in this area. Wiki’s article on the SPLC shows their history fighting self-avowed white racists...
Click to read more »in the unique classification system of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), where it roughly corresponds to racially segregated neopaganism of a particular...
Click to read more »page. NONE of you have countered the UNITED STATES COURT CASE REJECTING SPLC's reliability." 02:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 884506881 by...
Click to read more »any RS coverage of this organization (besides from groups like the ADL and SPLC that systematically collect hate groups, whether they are notable or not)...
Click to read more »use of SPLC, although I see how this got to this noticeboard, [[24]] is arguing it's a BLP issue because of the naming of Paul Cameron by SPLC in relationship...
Click to read more »fringe science are represented in Wikipedia. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) recently reported on the "Wikipedia wars" in which they say fringe views...
Click to read more »mentions the SPLC Very suspicious. John Reaves 18:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC) I don't understand, what's very suspicious about mentioning the SPLC and what...
Click to read more »that suggest material written by SPLC employees, edited by SPLC employees, approved by SPLC employees and posted on SPLC's website is somehow not self-published...
Click to read more »there's a unified black supremacy movement. Unaffiliated sources such as SPLC have used the term to describe the beliefs of groups such as the New Black...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Keep Sources about the 2002 controversy [5] [6] - I find that SPLC is a WP:RS. Sources on the the satirical flyer [7] [8] (less substantive...
Click to read more »just like the SPLC, is a RS for their actions. Why do you say they are not a neutral source? Are you also going to be OK saying the SPLC has a leftist...
Click to read more »an area of notoriety for SPLC. Major left and left leaning outlets have said the following about SPLC: Politico said of SPLC: “becoming more of a partisan...
Click to read more »now, due to the fact that the views he endorses are the kind of views the SPLC and ADL (as well as most people) find repugnant. Another red flag is that...
Click to read more »lead. Tactics include trying to discredit the SPLC, digging up ancient isolated references that label the SPLC as liberal etc. After a lengthy discussion...
Click to read more »such as Remnant Press, an obscure outfit classified as a hate group by the SPLC. The 3 refs in the article at present are to bio pages at the respective...
Click to read more »name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC) File:SPLC Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RaphaelQS...
Click to read more »in Front Page magazine. I'm willing to bet that it may be dealt with by SPLC or ADL, too. More research to follow. Jclemens (talk) 20:33, 1 July 2008...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Getting this up to snuff is going to be difficult, but with the SPLC and the New Yorker running stories on it it's at least as notable as your...
Click to read more »Poverty Law Center for taking interest in someone so inconsequential as Roosh. SPLC itself is not a third party source but a primary source. 68.5.176.101 (talk)...
Click to read more »Delete. After further searching, all RS coverage appears to come from the SPLC's listing of this group. Nothing of any depth found. Citations in the article...
Click to read more »high school censorship in California, Nebraska win 2023 Courage Award. The SPLC is clearly biased. The award is a bit self-serving and I don't think really...
Click to read more »and unique category of this classification does. I am surprised why the SPLC reference, number 12, was classified as unreliable, this stikes me as a solid...
Click to read more »by the SPLC that you are referring to. There are only two claims we are including: 1) the SPLC labels you a white supremicist and 2) the SPLC claims that...
Click to read more »would belong on SPLC Talk. Finally, I never said Spotfixer's first-ever edit was on SPLC (though I did refer to the first edit he made at SPLC). I've struck...
Click to read more »was too rough), then we could deal with it at that point. Others, such as SPLC have made their opinions known already. Ufwuct (talk) 14:13, 13 August 2012...
Click to read more »Some advocacy orgs can pass WP:RS (per WP:BIASED), in particular the WP:SPLC, which does briefly mention Doyle... but it's fair to doubt that the ones...
Click to read more »WP:RS). The two sources that look reasonable at first glance, profam and SPLC are just mentions that the subject is attending a conference. -- RoySmith...
Click to read more »statements (you don't have to use the SPLC article directly) to establish that the media has looked to the SPLC and the SPLC has this to say about Carlson, making...
Click to read more »neither helpful nor determinative when discussing a subject's notability. The SPLC's notability is unquestioned so any "controversy" is also not remotely relevant...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC) Also, worth noting, a publication of the SPLC describes Marshner's book "Cultural Conservatism" as "the script for what...
Click to read more »He's frequently on national cable news. The SPLC is not. So, he's more mainstream than the SPLC. Again, the SPLC is to social work what Robert Tilton is to...
Click to read more »Question: Is SPLC work product still used by the FBI? I think I read that the FBI were no longer relying on SPLC data. I don't like or trust the SPLC myself...
Click to read more »report that Dothan, Ala. police planted drugs on young black men [2] AL.com – SPLC retracts tweet linking to story about police officers planting drugs on black...
Click to read more »know the ordinary meaning of words like publisher or editor. Otherwise, the SPLC are obviously a highly reliable publisher of sources on racism and extremism...
Click to read more »edit warring, there are no BLP violations. It's an article ABOUT the SPLC, and the SPLC is a well respected organization and used in many media outlets, even...
Click to read more »been discussed in the New York Times, has other sources such as the ADL and SPLC. JoshuaZ 17:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC) Comment - Is there some sort of general...
Click to read more »That is one of the places I thought to look for a reference. For example, SPLC does not arrange its extensive content on hate crimes in a classification...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep. Significant coverage in Seattle Times, HuffPost, Wired, Vice, SPLC, New York Times, Associated Press, Ars Technica, The Verge. These sources...
Click to read more »criticisms of the SPLC in the SPLC article. A few more facts are in order. The Family Research Council has been labeled as a hate group by the SPLC. It promotes...
Click to read more »y_Law_Center#cite_note-109 In addition, the SPLC works with the FBI: 'The FBI has partnered with the SPLC "to establish rapport, share information, address...
Click to read more »disputed "Demar/SPLC" item Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [102] Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Demar/SPLC discussion Comments:...
Click to read more »certainly fall under the racist/hate category, and are listed as such by the SPLC. I really think that such views shouldn't be tolerated here, and I am sure...
Click to read more »the SPLC published a list of "anti-Muslim extremists", including British activist Maajid Nawaz and ex-Muslim activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali. The SPLC said...
Click to read more »Richard Lynn quote from the SPLC on "phasing out" populations, a quote that vdMerwe and SPLC could easily check, as SPLC lists the source (Lynn was explaining...
Click to read more »have different estimates of how many people attended the Sharpton rally (SPLC says a few dozen, MF says about 250). The "small group" of pro-Forrest...
Click to read more »non-surveyed evaluation of importance) that were only cited to SPLC were attributed. The only time SPLC was cited alone and not attributed was for the factual...
Click to read more »language. The New York Times calls them fascists. We have sourcing from the SPLC calling them a hate group and sourcing documenting them praising Hitler during...
Click to read more »"Undid revision 799354205 by Sro23 (talk)I am soliciting comments about SPLC and the methods used by other editors on this article." 05:10, 7 September...
Click to read more »the reliability of the SPLC and RSN also declared fairly unanimously that articles of the SPLC are the the voice of the SPLC and not the author, (with...
Click to read more »used to characterise SPLC, not the SPLC's claims, so that again is not WP:OR - it may be superfluous, but it isn't WP:OR. SPLC have characterised some...
Click to read more »reports on CAIR and SPLC accusing and says alt-right linked to WN. If numerous RSs" 13:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC) "/* Personal life */ splc does not cite ex...
Click to read more »article; instead, I actually removed it from the SPLC article because it was unsourced--please see the SPLC article history. In the second case, my addition...
Click to read more »sentence to the History section of the article on the SPLC. The sentence I wanted to include is: The SPLC maintains a blog entitled Hatewatch: Keeping an eye...
Click to read more »already. Two newspapers from his area discussing him, and Mother Jones and the SPLC discussing him in the context of someone else, and for an edgy remark he...
Click to read more »listed on the SPLC's list of White Power bands, with no other sources, I'd agree that she wouldn't be notable. But the fact that SPLC thinks she's a...
Click to read more »CNN source is Niewert or the SPLC mentioned? Darkness Shines (talk) 06:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC) Where is 'Niewert or the SPLC mentioned' in the sentence...
Click to read more »supremacist is not a good thing, and we can leave the "monitoring" to the SPLC and other noble ventures. There is no "notability": there is only popularity...
Click to read more »to [19] both concern Ravinsky) to ones made by Badmintonhist in 2012. On SPLC, Motsebboh's edits and arguments are almost exactly the same as those made...
Click to read more »petition signatories knew it would be used for a pro-FRC/anti-SPLC ad. It was shortly after the SPLC had labeled the FRC as haters. Any record of any of any...
Click to read more »happening towards non-minorities". Good job boys, you did it. Now go defend the SPLC for being a reliable source for defending this kind of narrative. 71.197...
Click to read more »authoritative source]". (It appears that the Canadian Anti-Hate Network is an SPLC-equivalent for Canada, but I don't know if they publish a formal hate-group...
Click to read more »2013, the SPLC named the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) as a "virulently anti-gay" organization. Professor Mike Adams criticized the SPLC because "Their...
Click to read more »case are now readily available from neutral sites around the Web (not just SPLC or Patriot sites). This should help clear up the NPOV problems. 95% of the...
Click to read more »SPLC in an attempt to disprove reliability of a source is merely an "appeal to authority", which in itself is a logical fallacy. The ADL and the SPLC...
Click to read more »such as Minor Threat, Propagandhi, the Dead Kennedys and Bad Religion. The SPLC, while a respectable organization, has an interest in portraying the existence...
Click to read more »to use the SPLC for slanderous statements against Molyneux, but not for other factually important things. (Also, when I mentioned the SPLC as a source...
Click to read more »[200] in the lead which was supported by the SPLC in the article body. SCDarrow's fixation on the SPLC commentary about the men's rights movement took...
Click to read more »live persons. The reliable sources says about using SPLC "Take care to ensure that content from the SPLC constitutes due weight in the article and conforms...
Click to read more »seem to mean that we cannot cite eminently reliable expert sources (e.g., SPLC) in BLPs when no editor would raise a reasonable objection. ElKevbo (talk)...
Click to read more »local Roanoke newspaper article ([4]) is about him, sort of, as well as SPLC Intelligence report (but then, they cover just about every racist group in...
Click to read more »discussion about the Category:Organisations designated as hate groups by the SPLC. The SPLC is widely recognised as a reliable academic source: https://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »information about the organization and add promotional information), to SPLC (to add poorly sourced negative information after they labeled CFAM a hate...
Click to read more »available to them. The first is to get a consensus on the talk page that the SPLC is unreliable and the information should be removed, and the second is to...
Click to read more »says that the SPLC or the ADL put the group on a list, rather than citing their own publications directly. If you see someone citing SPLC's own publications...
Click to read more »press (diff - undo) - Link: www.wpfc.org/. * Links added in this diff: www.splc.org/ (462, 56, 1, 1) www.wpfc.org/ (462, 10, 1, 1) www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3...
Click to read more »the SPLC listing, without which we have an organization of roughly the same prominence as a local PTA. It's already been established that a SPLC listing...
Click to read more »indictment alleges that SPLC deceived banks about the purposes of payments. For that reason, I propose that we probably should not cite SPLC's accounting department...
Click to read more »(+92) . . Southern Poverty Law Center (Explain specifically why the SPLC labels the FRC a hate group.) 08:50, 2 May 2017 (diff | hist) . . (-267)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:FRINGE group, and did not represent Wikipedia:FRINGE#Reliable_sources. The SPLC is an unreliable source, and attempts to associate the subject of the sentence...
Click to read more »it because of the SPLC "hate group" debate. There is still nothing there which justifies the inclusion other than it's on the SPLC list. — Arthur Rubin...
Click to read more »♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 02:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Being mentioned by SPLC also does not constitute nontrivial coverage, and in fact the guidline syays...
Click to read more »was WP:DUEWEIGHT in the article? We often include information for SPLC because the SPLC is itself widely covered by independent sources. If HNH is literally...
Click to read more »registrar. This is what the articles from the SPLC, Seattle Times (local company), Vice, BBC are about. The SPLC has a single article on the company, zero...
Click to read more »the SPLC but not any specific criticism of the SPLC's treatment of FAIR -- in fact it appears that the Harper's writer actually agrees with the SPLC's criticism...
Click to read more »made at SPLC that they hate. After I added a one-sentence, NPOV edit to SPLC, “In a 2010 book-length issue of exposés devoted entirely to the SPLC, the journal...
Click to read more »if the selection pressures on these traits were sufficiently strong. The SPLC is also guilty of being a bit too eager to dismiss such hypotheses (and,...
Click to read more »indeed ascribe this chiefly to Jews and Belarusians, however hs is per the SPLC "a long history of right-wing activism and controversy surrounding anti-Semitism"...
Click to read more »7 May 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 895959573 by Bilorv (talk) Again, the SPLC does not have MGTOW on their list of hate groups. You are putting words into...
Click to read more »And the Hill's coverage was an opinion piece by a representative of an SPLC-designated hate group. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »discussing SPLC's list). Chen 2006 (SPLC and ADL are authoritative sources for identifying domestic extremists and hate groups") Perry 2001 (SPLC provides...
Click to read more »24 January 2009 (UTC) An anon IP editor made this edit to assert that the SPLC has created "Westboro Baptist Church" as a new category of hate group. When...
Click to read more »identifying and combating anti-Semitism (civil rights organizations like ADL and SPLC come to mind). This new category would provide for a factually-accurate categorization...
Click to read more »become truly notable within militia social circles, but only AFTER the ADL, SPLC and Homeland Security gave them free publicity (My inside sources explain...
Click to read more »right movement that it discusses as well as the opinion of the article. The SPLC is a well-regarded group that I would compare in stature to the EFF or the...
Click to read more »group listings */ more about terrorist attack on Family Research Council, SPLC labelling dissenting political groups "hate groups"") 2. 15:54, 8 March 2013...
Click to read more »contentious in nature, requiring substantially stronger sourcing that the SPLC blogs. I find it reprehensible to try using incidents of this nature to score...
Click to read more »include 14 reverts related to the SPLC as a source, an edit to the SPLC article itself, and an edit unrelated to the SPLC. Necessary for newer users: A diff...
Click to read more »different contexts. One person so named has caught the attention of the SPLC and other organisation concerned with people who expound anti-Semitic views...
Click to read more »Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) from the same sentence, calling it a "POV term"[131]. Willmcw removes "leftist" from SPLC[132] and reinserts "neo-confederate"...
Click to read more »Kuhlmeier (diff). Links: www.post-gazette.com/pg/06085/675560-58.stm www.splc.org/newsflash_archives.asp?id=1171&year=2006 www.palmbeachpost...
Click to read more »with citations to the SPLC and ADL? I'm fine with that. MilesMoney (talk) 16:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC) We already use the SPLC and ADL. We should examine...
Click to read more »been described by the SPLC (and elsewhere) as part of the "manosphere". Wikipedia considers the SPLC a reliable source. The SPLC has described the manosphere...
Click to read more »Lara❤Love 16:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Let me get this straight - the ADL and the SPLC consider this racist, but you see no problem creating a ubox which states...
Click to read more »(UTC) "Re-removed "white supremacist views" statements - comments by the SPLC require attribution to them, and Data & Society presumably do too, if we're...
Click to read more »pages of a Google search for this string didn't bring up anything about the SPLC, so this doesn't seem to have any sort of real usage. Hog Farm (talk) 20:01...
Click to read more »include all LGBT articles and all articles concerning SPLC or organizations listed as hate groups by SPLC. Belchfire-TALK 05:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC) Yes...
Click to read more »That is just malarky. That second word is a word used by the likes of the SPLC and other fraud organizations to delegitimaize those they disagree with politically...
Click to read more »disrepute. The first one says "only on Wikipedia" (when, in fact, the ADL and SPLC both consider "white pride" to be racist). Admins are held to a higher standard...
Click to read more »journal/book sources that describe him and his work. That's in addition to the two SPLC sources and the seven other references I recently added. There are now around...
Click to read more »there is mainstream right wing criticism of the SPLC or (2) there is Matt Barber's criticism of the SPLC or (3) nothing. So when you weigh in, try and weigh...
Click to read more »University (diff). Links: www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,301314,00.html www.splc.org/newsflash.asp?id=1655&year. 2007-12-12 04:13:36: User en:Brianga (talk...
Click to read more »but as to your heat/light comment, the SPLC page to which I had added the BIAS tag because it looked like an SPLC advertisement turned out to be --- an...
Click to read more »content ESPECIALLY to a non-public figure. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is an American non-profit legal organization, whose stated purpose is to...
Click to read more »to the SPLC for a reliable source. Is this concordant with Wikipedia policy? As to the definition of a "hate" group, is that defined by the SPLC? Is the...
Click to read more »03:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Keep notable for the federal court decision, see SPLC Seraphim System (talk) 05:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »KillerChihuahua?!? 19:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC) On a related note, I'd hesitate to use SPLC as a sole source. I share their general politics, but they have been criticized...
Click to read more »WP:GREL. TarnishedPathtalk 00:43, 27 January 2026 (UTC) As reliable as the SPLC is, so Option 1. This does not make their opinions automatically due weight...
Click to read more »October 2016 (UTC) to 15:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 15:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC) "SPLC is not a reliable source" 15:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC) "remove unreliable...
Click to read more »become truly notable within militia social circles, but only AFTER the ADL, SPLC and Homeland Security gave them free publicity (My inside sources explain...
Click to read more »about PUAs, MRAs, internet trolls, standup comedians, and feminists. And the SPLC report is primarily about men's rights activists, not MGTOW, and also only...
Click to read more »statements should be included with attribution as other similar groups (like SPLC for hate groups), to keep it out of wikivoice. Which leaves us with journalism...
Click to read more »have indeed by described this way, by the SPLC. The multiple discussion threads always end the same way: the SPLC material is supported by consensus. The...
Click to read more »However, if you run down their staff - staff - you'll get Kenneth O'Keefe (see SPLC), Gilad Atzmon (see HopeNotHate), and quite a few other red flags. They are...
Click to read more »the deletion of Category:Organizations designated as hate groups by the SPLC here. I discovered this morning that User:StAnselm had struck out all edits...
Click to read more »you stay away from BLPs. StAnselm (talk) 05:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC) The SPLC and ADL both say they run a hate group. I don't think that acknowledging...
Click to read more »reporting today that the SPLC has allegedly funded certain RW extremist groups, it may be appropriate to revisit the SPLC's use as a source for topics...
Click to read more »December 2020. Brendan, Brendan Joel (7 June 2018). "PragerU's Influence". SPLC Southern Poverty Law Center. Archived from the original on 12 December 2020...
Click to read more »combative account and one sock". Referred to an attributed quote of the SPLC (an esteemed source for such matters) as defamatory in the SPI filing. Repeated...
Click to read more »and far-right. The SPLC also dislikes both antisemites and islamophobes, I think my opinion is quite similar to that of the SPLC. [31] (((The Quixotic...
Click to read more »denials. All ABC does is quote SPLC. If you wanted to break that off and buttress the use of SPLC as a source to say what SPLC says, that would be fine. As...
Click to read more »the SPLC exclusively. Would you still support requiring attribution to the SPLC for pure facts? So the above would become According to the SPLC, Strom...
Click to read more »trolling.--Isotope23 17:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC) Is this something about the SPLC? I can't read what was there, but see this. Corvus cornix 21:31, 9 February...
Click to read more »changing "racist" to "racialist") and removal of critical information from the SPLC is what swayed me, and the throwing stones to hide his hands doesn't help...
Click to read more »allegations regarding Steve Bannon's co-conspirator in the Wall fraud scheme "SPLC is not a reliable source, but an opponent in the cultural war" all kinds...
Click to read more »(UTC) A discussion which includes the assessment of the reliability of the SPLC as a source of reference for Wikipedia article lead paragraphs is taking...
Click to read more »as a sort of behavioral problem. I don't see it. Or to take another, the SPLC page. Srich32977 has made steady and objective improvements, some of which...
Click to read more »past few weeks since he was encouraged to "enjoy the battle" [91] at the SPLC article by another tendentious editor. When it spilled over to two previous...
Click to read more »Salon, Salon twice, Breitbart, Daily Kos, Daily Beast, Washington Post, SPLC, and The New York Times, but no indication of lasting significance. That...
Click to read more »secondary sources like the SPLC is exactly what establishes notability. --Parabolist (talk) 04:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC) Delete SPLC is not sufficiently reliable...
Click to read more »Patriot groups define themselves as opposed to the 'New World Order'. The SPLC cited reference did indeed include the phrase "or advocate or adhere to extreme...
Click to read more »Dougweller (talk · contribs) really objects to is that the material shows up the SPLC to have lied in its report which the article quotes directly before the material...
Click to read more »Geller contains opinionated material supported by politically biased sources (SPLC and Huffington Post). Judicious edits were made to remove the opinionated...
Click to read more »characteristics across three races instead of two. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has described VDARE as a hate group. (cite from Southern Poverty Law Center)...
Click to read more »up sensationalist editorialization" 04:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC) "Clarified SPLC mission" 04:53, 7 June 2015 (UTC) "cleaned" 04:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC) "clean"...
Click to read more »the SPLC is quoted as saying that Kemp "left South Africa because he testified in the trials of Janusz Waluś and Clive Derby-Lewis." The SPLC has absolutely...
Click to read more »January 2020 (UTC) I removed the citation to an apology for a (deleted) SPLC article which mentions Rania Khalek because the piece, and the responses...
Click to read more »the attack to the SPLC hate designation is a small minority view, but it's repeated by the Washington Post Magazine [130] and the SPLC itself [131] among...
Click to read more »or its founder, John Tanton, and nothing favorable is said about Dees or SPLC, even if sourced. I haven't mastered how to make diffs yet or I would provide...
Click to read more »(by the way, there are also numerous RSes attesting to that, including the SPLC who monitors his blog). Honestly, Deleet needs an indef, considering that...
Click to read more »more flattering to Ngo. Go further back and you see block reverts of the SPLC,[276][277] Daily Beast,[278] Columbia Journalism Review,[279] The Guardian...
Click to read more »attempting to skew the article from neutrality. Politically opposed to the SPLC, which they feel is a left-wing otganization, they jumped on the issue of...
Click to read more »org, archive.is and webcitation.org and 4chan have conspired to edit the SPLC page (I am not sure to what end, it just seems they were talking about it...
Click to read more »given to two other people, and is irrelevant to the allegation made by the SPLC against Kemp. The sentences handed out to other people belong in their Wiki...
Click to read more »more flattering to Ngo. Go further back and you see block reverts of the SPLC,[349][350] Daily Beast,[351] Columbia Journalism Review,[352] The Guardian...
Click to read more »a secondary source reporting that the SPLC has said this", which doesn't make sense if we agree that the SPLC's opinion is automatically worth including...
Click to read more »been an ongoing effort to build consensus between editors on key disputes (SPLC, Tanton's role, "range of think tanks") on Talk, in which you haven't participated...
Click to read more »comments that seem to be about using SPLC as a source in other articles. [19] [20] As we do not mention CIS in the SPLC article what article are you talking...
Click to read more »I don't usually deal with SPLC sources in the areas I tend to edit, but I don't see much similarity between SBM and the SPLC iether. SBM appears to be...
Click to read more »talkpage thread, there is a recent archived discussion about criticism of the SPLC's finances). The contested info oddly enough appears on his user page. The...
Click to read more »January 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1001571661 by NedFausa (talk) You cite splc as a source...that’s as authoritative as using the dailybeast as a fact citation...
Click to read more »his at Oscar Wilde. At Talk:Irish slaves myth he wrote "the idea that the SPLC, a far-left partisan organisation that in addition to spreading deliberate...
Click to read more »organization website", ie the SPLC. SunCrow objected at Talk:Alan Sears#Citation to SPLC Website arguing that the SPLC is " an advocacy group whose ideology...
Click to read more »reporter prior to this position; he did not found the SPLC, and is simply someone who presents SPLC information to the nation and the world. The article's...
Click to read more »plainly evidence in the amount of sourcing, or for example the title of the SPLC article "'No-Go Zones': The Myth That Just Won't Quit".[7] or the article...
Click to read more »Crownjewel has told me straight up what type of source he will accept. The SPLC probably wont classify Mexica as a hate group, but he doesn't want to hear...
Click to read more »kept getting thicker. (Edit by VPN and interested in American politics and SPLC and philosophy and keep extremely weird hours and personalize disputes and...
Click to read more »notability. Together with the details on his life and work provided by the SPLC which enable us to source an article, descriptors like "popular" in RS publications...
Click to read more »misogynists", right? Mens rights activism was specifically identified by the SPLC as a hate group. It is not controversial to suggest that hate groups like...
Click to read more »No vandalism found, only a good faith actions by an uninvolved admin to fix a problem. Fortunately for RC, I'm not big on boomerangs. Dennis Brown - 2¢...
Click to read more »Minnesota Twin Cities area. Article is here purely as a coatrack to cover it's SPLC "hate group" listing." – MrX 16:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC) Comment I find it...
Click to read more »FRC article despite its notability as proven by the recent shooting. The SPLC listing you hid way down until it became advantageous to bring it up to the...
Click to read more »them look like a Muslim advocacy group run entirely by Muslims, but the SPLC (arguably the premier authority on hate groups in America) gives a different...
Click to read more »WP:RSN#American Mercury et al GBH refers to the "Antigentile activists groups ADL / SPLC". As for the specific complaint about altering other editors' comments, I...
Click to read more »POV pushing [34] Giving spurious reasons as to why the SPLC would not be reliable for a relatively uncontroversial claim. [35] Different...
Click to read more »18:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC) [3] who cares about years of research by the SPLC, the all-knowing MjolnirPants knows this is not a right-wing biased source...
Click to read more »— Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 12:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC) Of these, I think the SPLC and the TNR are fine to keep in. Some of them are valid removals, usage of...
Click to read more »anti-abortion group look bad. Also, as has been well documented with the SPLC, they label many groups as hate groups who have no connection to violence...
Click to read more »(but left it in the content) and trimmed a rather wordy citation of why the SPLC issued its classification, but left the classification and its sources standing...
Click to read more »change the !vote I made in the AfD. Sadly, anti-Semites mentioned by the SPLC and/or the ADL are a dime a dozen. XOR'easter (talk) 22:03, 14 July 2019...
Click to read more »(UTC) Um... The article suggests that Nation of Islam is a hate group by the SPLC. Plus, that's mostly African American. What about people of European descent...
Click to read more »commenting on? The fact that the WBC is classified as a hate group by the SPLC is clearly cited, even if it's not obvious already that this is a hate campaign...
Click to read more »generally reliable. Attribution may be necessary. Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) [805], generally reliable. As an advocacy group, the Southern Poverty Law...
Click to read more »(Amy D'orio) and whiney control-freak Jews ("Teaching Tolerance" being a SPLC front). The latter organisation in particular moan about everything and anything...
Click to read more »lead should mention the controversy about the hate-group listing by the SPLC. It was originally added after a long discussion before it was removed after...
Click to read more »here: http://american3rdposition.com/?page_id=195. In addition the bias from SPLC and ADL against pro-white organizations is well known. Slaja (talk) 00:44...
Click to read more »”" Donald Trump’s Visit to Poland Further Emboldens Far-Right Elements, SPLC, 17 July 2017, quote:"Chodakiewicz’s far-right beliefs have not only centered...
Click to read more »ethnicity or a nationality, and then the edits you show above about whether the SPLC is a Jewish source (which I always imagined it was atheist). I'd say the...
Click to read more »the criteria. So Category:Organizations designated as hate groups by the SPLC was deleted (rightly IMO) at CFD 2014 April 12. However, it still seems to...
Click to read more »with the correct publisher. However, there is another problem: the cited SPLC source does not mention Woodley, and no reliable sources have directly criticized...
Click to read more »and ties of the PB with white nationalism and white supremacism (e.g. the SPLC). This could have been stated in the close, and this would have made the...
Click to read more »lead should mention the controversy about the hate-group listing by the SPLC. It was originally added after a long discussion before it was removed after...
Click to read more »label it antisemitic. The ADL does call it "anti-Zionist", however, but the SPLC has used it in some of its articles as a reference regarding cases of actual...
Click to read more »another useful source. It seems an obvious oversight considering that the SPLC is generally considered an expert source on far-right racist and white supremacist...
Click to read more »subsequent article edits--please see Talk:Men's_rights_movement#Removal_of_SPLC_section_and_material_in_the_lead. Since I spoke out in that discussion I...
Click to read more »IP blocked by Oshwah (non-admin closure) . Kpgjhpjm 17:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent...
Click to read more »Giorgi Balakhadze (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Virtually every time there's a discussion about Georgia-related...
Click to read more »they want to reify the concept as existing other than as the opinion of the SPLC. What is relevant is that Insomesia self-identifies as a member of a clique...
Click to read more »deleted a section on the mrm talk page. Prior to that you argued that the SPLC criticism should be removed and South19 disagreed with you (see talk "Is...
Click to read more »has also encouraged battleground behavior in other editors, e.g. at the SPLC and Media Matters articles, so I'm not surprised to see his conduct brought...
Click to read more »would suggest that the wording established there (including criticism of SPLC) should be in the lead. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Why would any of your concerns not equally apply to sources like SPLC? Also, this isn't an opinion but a basic statement of fact which can be verified...
Click to read more »politicizing a content dispute) February 10, 2015 "Added response to the tripe. SPLC loses respect by the day." (edit summary - Politicizing a content dispute)...
Click to read more »free-speech grounds case I referenced above, and her related involvement with a SPLC tracked extremist hate-group and their events? I just found a couple more...
Click to read more »Muslims, is a "fake news" site. Furthermore, it does not affect them that the SPLC specifically lists their article on a page they devote to what they interpret...
Click to read more »is an in-depth report by a respected organization, however we often view SPLC/ADL reports as primaryish. ref18 - JPOST reporting on ADL's report (which...
Click to read more »proven (Redacted) − Daryush Valizadeh look good. Daryush Valizadeh is on SPLC and ADL watchlist. − − (Redacted) − in order to edit out daily reliable information...
Click to read more »requirements, especially in its notice by the powerful organizations ADL and SPLC. As for @Connor Machiavelli:, I think more than one user is acting way too...
Click to read more »that didn't pan out, the argument switched to... ... the claim that while SPLC was reliable for "hate groups" it was not reliable for "history". Even though...
Click to read more »Dissent isn't a reason to block. He has references for what he's saying (i.e SPLC ), he's not using blogs or forums, nor is he using tabloids. His additions...
Click to read more »not combing through ancient dirt. In the case of Kobach, I stumbled upon a SPLC article on my feed when he was being considered to run a commission about...
Click to read more »reverted once on the side of the SPA account). This article, and especially the SPLC-related information which was involved, was previously a favourite of now-blocked...
Click to read more »attack. Past versions of his user page expressed contempt for CNN and the SPLC, our acceptance of which apparently makes us a cancer Again, literally all...
Click to read more »"commonly refers" to Cultural Marxism as a conspiracy theory? If it's the SPLC, then reword the sentence so that it states so explicitly. If it is left-wing...
Click to read more »Law Center were to point out a hate group these admins would attack the SPLC for not being nice while ignoring the terrible actions of the hate groups...
Click to read more »herself with the sole exception of the SPLC citation — and the problem with the SPLC reference isn't that the SPLC are "hatemongers" (which is not a claim...
Click to read more »neo-facist), Death in June ("neofolk" band considered hate music by the SPLC), Johannes Stark (Hitler supporter and main figure in movement to remove...
Click to read more »screed by a blogger for the Weekly Standard, and they share a dislike for the SPLC?!? I'm so shocked you could knock me over with a feather... like, really...
Click to read more »suggest that we refrain from using Jewish interest groups such as the ADL or SPLC when talking about topics and characters that have to do with white culture...
Click to read more »seriousness, that President Obama is possessed by demons." Peter Sprigg: SPLC quoting Sprigg's 2010 book, Homosexual Assault in the Military: "Welcoming...
Click to read more »pattern of whitewashing as described by Doug Weller in interview with the SPLC: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/03/12/wikipedia-wars-inside-fi...
Click to read more »"anti-Muslim" group,[32] InsideHigherEd describes him as "anti-Muslim"[33]. ADL and SPLC also describe him as anti-Muslim as well. There's no BLP violation. This...
Click to read more »subject), or objection to the use of sources that were called out by the SPLC/HopeNotHate/others (and covered in RS) for their various activities and that...
Click to read more »disruptive cite-tagging trying to undermine well sourced content supported by SPLC. Also directly referenced AIM website. Gotta leave my laptop for a while...
Click to read more »@Guerillero: Proud Boys have been designated as a racist hate group by the SPLC, often marketing themselves as "western chauvinists", with an "anti-white...
Click to read more »boilerplate choices of pre-loaded edit summaries.) Daimler92's addition to SPLC was a good one, and the dispute at Kalergi Plan is minor—no secondary source...
Click to read more »one, not multicultural or gay!".videoNewsweek. He's been covered by the SPLC (2009, 2017) and HopeNothate. Coverage in Newsweek.[[46]. You may read these...
Click to read more »stretch back years. For example, he, in 2020, removed material about the SPLC apologizing to Khalek with the false claim that the material was located...
Click to read more »want. We're still writing encyclopedia biographies, not entries for the SPLC. --Masem (t) 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC) Masem wrote: "No where else on...
Click to read more »assess the consensus at Talk:Public Advocate of the United States#RfC Should SPLC "hate group" designation be in the lead?? The discussion was initiated 23...
Click to read more »beneficial ever aggressive fundraising by the SPLC. Wikipedia needs to stop acting as an auxiliar to the SPLC fundraising scam.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:14...
Click to read more »org/ http://royalpurple.ksu.edu/pdfs/flint-hills-program.pdf http://www.splc.org/newsflash_archives.asp?id=1902&year=2009 What do you think? —Preceding...
Click to read more »Poland has frequently published pieces by a Holocaust denier.[5] Per the SPLC - "the weekly Najwyzszy Czas! (The Time is Now!). That's the magazine of...
Click to read more »upload. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC) If groups such as the SPLC label an organization as a "hate group", should it be included in the lead...
Click to read more »section explaining the SPLC article, along with the criticisms it had attracted.[37] This was reverted back. The link to the SPLC article and their reasons...
Click to read more »policy that I understand to include storied organizations like the ACLU, the SPLC and the American Poultry Association, which is generally reliable for non-controversial...
Click to read more »is is pretty easy in this case and little dispute about the aims of the SPLC; but as a general rule I think we should be careful about using descriptors...
Click to read more »reliable source that reports on Rightpedia in depth, aside from the two SPLC articles which are equally, if not more about Wikipedia/WMF's policies. This...
Click to read more »couldn't possibly be "neo". Mangoe (talk) 21:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC) The SPLC is a political group and however sympathetic I am to their cause, I do not...
Click to read more »sources do use the title-case version for the movement itself, notably the SPLC. Other sources use a mixture of alternative right, alternative Right, and...
Click to read more »Media". He/she summarizes this interview as follows: "In the last year the SPLC has also expressed concern that hot rhetoric and disinformation is causing...
Click to read more »Mises entry the SPLC critique and charges of racism etc., and I put up some comments by Horowitz that showed that some people believe SPLC exaggerates sometimes--he...
Click to read more »based on the publication by SPLC [44]. However, I would not put this claim by SPLC to the lead of the BLP page because SPLC is an advocacy group. My very...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was redirect to Mises Caucus. The SPLC source is roughly acceptable and the Reason video is of rather high quality...
Click to read more »an attack term used by the fraudulent, discredited and racial stratifying SPLC to attack others shows this is largely a way to discredit the work of others...
Click to read more »aid=719 It would seem contradictory to cite SPLC against Ferrara as evidence of his non-notability, when SPLC bases their attack on Ferrara expressly on...
Click to read more »mudslinging for which he and several other conference attendees are well known. SPLC http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/09/16/political-mudslingers-populate-...
Click to read more »(UTC) @Bus stop: understanding that SPLC is an advocacy group, I wanted to know Molyneux's actual opinions, and the SPLC website both quotes and links them...
Click to read more »1 is dead, 4 are SoT, 1 is SPLC, 1 is UPI, 3 are local news articles, 1 is gay advocacy which appears to rely on the SPLC. Total: 6 secondary sources...
Click to read more »full understanding that there are many true nuts out there, but after the SPLC went after groups that only engage in law suits and never in violance as...
Click to read more »year since. It appears to be mostly based on work by the SPLC. I have nothing against the SPLC; but don’t like seeing an article mostly based on one primary...
Click to read more »racists, anti-Semites, conspiracy theorists, etc. The fact that neither the SPLC or the ADL (let alone the news media) have covered him in detail indicates...
Click to read more »even if held by the absolutely non-partisan SPLC. One can have "She has been called far-right by the SPLC" but that is not the same as saying she is far-right...
Click to read more »scholarly analysis of SPLC, certainly the only one I've encountered...this doesn't mean this article is the only analysis of SPLC or that it is valid as...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC) The word is now subject to a report by the SPLC [1] '''tAD''' (talk) 22:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC) Keep. This source alone is...
Click to read more »SPLC is not a living person. On the SPLC page hates groups were/are listed is if they were actually hate groups, instead of saying this was SPLC's view...
Click to read more »[56]: Citing www.savingjews.org(Poray). [57] - edited+self-published by SPLC-profiled individual.[58] Radzilowski asserts Neo-Stalinism of BLPs + academic...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Getting this up to snuff is going to be difficult, but with the SPLC and the New Yorker running stories on it it's at least as notable as your...
Click to read more »neither the SPLC nor the Daily Caller, and thus is not a reference for this sentence. The other is to the SPLC's website, which shows that the SPLC made this...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Comment. SPLC gives a fair amount of coverage to the theory here; other reliable coverage...
Click to read more »extended information will be found. Collect (talk) 12:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC) SPLC is a reliable source, but it is a political watchdog group and should be...
Click to read more »surprised there isn't more. Mercer is mentioned in this article from the SPLC and this article from Slate, and this one from the Baffler. If the article...
Click to read more »politicizing a content dispute) February 10, 2015 "Added response to the tripe. SPLC loses respect by the day." (edit summary - Politicizing a content dispute)...
Click to read more »statements should be included with attribution as other similar groups (like SPLC for hate groups), to keep it out of wikivoice. Which leaves us with journalism...
Click to read more »www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/newsreleases/2006mn014_attachments/$FILE/SPLC%20statement%20on%20strain.pdf www.stpso.org/meetsheriff.html. * User is on...
Click to read more »userspace sandboxes of long-term/established, but inactive editors?", "Should an SPLC classification as a hate group be automatically leadworthy?" and of course...
Click to read more »(UTC) Strong delete The campaign to triple- and quadruple cover all things SPLC has got to end. Wikipedia is being (ab)used as a soapbox, and the campaign...
Click to read more »classification on its website, but the SPLC has its own definition, limited to racist neo-pagan groups. The SPLC's definition also seems to be the one used...
Click to read more »material", and probably still thinks that I think that editors can't quote the SPLC. Unscintillating (talk) 06:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC) (edit conflict) StillStanding-247...
Click to read more »not to publicize the SPLC's listings. Mangoe (talk) 03:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC) I'm not working or interested in promoting SPLC, however, they do seem...
Click to read more »reconsidered my vote and wish to change it, for the reason which follows. The SPLC is now being quoted as a reputable source on the Jason Kessler page, to ensure...
Click to read more »there's a unified black supremacy movement. Unaffiliated sources such as SPLC have used the term to describe the beliefs of groups such as the New Black...
Click to read more »so are (distinct advocacy groups) ACLU and NRA and SPLC -- and having cautions on using ACLU and SPLC and NRA and WND seems correct per WP:BIASED, but that...
Click to read more »described in sources as an appropriate expert in that political area (eg like SPLC for hate groups), we should completely avoid using them as reliable sources...
Click to read more »No its all POV, SPLC Hates "Hate Groups" thus this mean of course one can spin it into a dozen bad directions. Its one thing to SPLC say group "A" is...
Click to read more »Center] got involved in the controversy - the source doesn't even mention SPLC! I also removed a bunch of uncited claims. The removal was fully justified...
Click to read more »sentences contain a reference to him. He's not mention as an aside in the SPLC piece. A candidate is not only notable if they win a major office, as per...
Click to read more »argument about New York Times masquerading opinion pieces as "news" and the SPLC self publishing nothing but opinion pieces? They are both deemed reliable...
Click to read more »get the information from academic sources and groups such as the ADL and SPLC. So it needs stronger sourcing than media usage. But media usage does show...
Click to read more »accurate picture.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:08, 30 April 2011 (UTC) There was an SPLC Intelligence Report article explicitly about this, and the C-Span source...
Click to read more »(UTC) The SPLC is an eminently reliable source on the radical right. Contra OP, the article's poster is identified in the byline, and SPLC has editorial...
Click to read more »complaints that specific criticisms of LVMI lacked cites, that my article for SPLC was not legitimate, and that material posted on the LVMI website could not...
Click to read more »support a biographical article, save an attack piece about him from the SPLC. Thargor Orlando (talk) 21:20, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »called Lancaster Unity. --Dezidor (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC) If the SPLC's outrageously false allegations against me are to be included, then it is...
Click to read more »January 2018 (UTC) delete I'm not convinced that simply getting listed by the SPLC is enough notoriety, and while appears that Phelps's book has a better claim...
Click to read more »Schoenewolf Hi Gfswolf, while the reliability of the SPLC as a source (WP:RS) is disputed, the SPLC article cited in the current version of Gerald Schoenewolf...
Click to read more »CHODAKIEWICZ WITH CONTROVERSIAL VIEWS SERVES ON HOLOCAUST MUSEUM BOARD, SPLC, 29 November 2009 DID A POLISH FAR RIGHT ACTIVIST HELP DONALD TRUMP WRITE...
Click to read more »Mosaic Project" are both pretty reliable sources. The only criticism of SPLC has come from actual hate sites. The American Mosaic Project is the Department...
Click to read more »org[12] is a right-wing conspiracy site. See [13] and the linked but old SPLC page in that aricle, [14]. Look at this site containing a lot of his videos...
Click to read more »being Wikipedians. Wired: race and gender Manstead: no mention of Wikipedia SPLC: is about fringe and racism Nguyen: is about a study of Wikipedia users to...
Click to read more »indeed ascribe this chiefly to Jews and Belarusians, however hs is per the SPLC "a long history of right-wing activism and controversy surrounding anti-Semitism"...
Click to read more »basis for a section on his views and as evidence for notability: Salon, SPLC, Raw Story, Washington Spectator (that one republished in Newsweek). I wouldn't...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC) I have gotten the impression that ADL and SPLC, more than most other advocacy groups, can be used for some level of noncontroversial...
Click to read more »(SPLC) (RSP entry) is one of the most controversially classified sources in this list. There has never been a request for comment (RfC) for the SPLC....
Click to read more »Center for Independent Media, just as we allow material published by the SPLC, ACLU, and CAIR. Many of those media outlets you're deeming as "blogs" have...
Click to read more »is sourced directly to SPLC. There has been a lot of discussion lately about the possible defamation lawsuit against the SPLC, so the other question I...
Click to read more »2 December 2019 (UTC) Delete I have to admit I am sick and tired of the SPLC being treated as a reliable source, when it throws around the label of "hate"...
Click to read more »discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC) What is SPLC? The SPLC disambiguation page doesn't seem to have anything relevant. SpinningSpark...
Click to read more »election fraud are without basis (whether that's true or not); and that the SPLC labeling a group as a hate group is a clear indication that it IS a hate...
Click to read more »Center for Independent Media, just as we allow material published by the SPLC, ACLU, and CAIR. Many of those media outlets you're deeming as "blogs" have...
Click to read more »the SPLC lists them as a hate group they do not provide any information about them. TFD (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC) Delete trivial mention by SPLC. Not...
Click to read more »in Front Page magazine. I'm willing to bet that it may be dealt with by SPLC or ADL, too. More research to follow. Jclemens (talk) 20:33, 1 July 2008...
Click to read more »different things. Moreover, the reason we have that article is that the SPLC's designation of groups as hate groups is widely discussed, praised, criticized...
Click to read more »Delaware-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Delete the SPLC is not a realible source. They are notorious for engaging in inflamatory...
Click to read more »activist,[13] profiled by the SPLC.[14][15] Another editor was a m.sc student at time of publication and is presently at SPLC-designated FAIR.[16][17] The...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Failed PROD, but I believe this is worth discussing. Yes, SPLC, ADL, and other advocacy groups cover this in-depth and are reliable sources...
Click to read more »organization is not notable, 2) Liberal Blogs are not reliable sources. 3) SPLC is not a reliable source, they call all conservative organizations hate groups...
Click to read more »September 2012 (UTC) Agreed. But if you want a reliable source stating the SPLC has labeled the Faithful Word Baptist Church a hate group here is one: [60]...
Click to read more »Prayer unsavoury, I don't see how you can call them "neo-nazis" when the SPLC doesn't even list them as a hate group. Connor Behan (talk) 13:57, 12 August...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Should we have an anti-White lobby page about the NAACP, the SPLC and other organizations based on the writings of David Duke? Should we have...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Should we have an anti-White lobby page about the NAACP, the SPLC and other organizations based on the writings of David Duke? Should we have...
Click to read more »trivial mentions that don't pass "significant." SPLC has identified it as a hate group, but I don't think SPLC sources alone can hold up an article. I also...
Click to read more »their politics than their music (including mentions by the ADL [26] and SPLC [27]). So I'd contend that the notability of the band is as much a function...
Click to read more »such as Minor Threat, Propagandhi, the Dead Kennedys and Bad Religion. The SPLC, while a respectable organization, has an interest in portraying the existence...
Click to read more »the group, I cannot find anything they wrote about Looveer. Also, the ADL, SPLC and Searchlight have no articles about her. The problem is that we do not...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Note that "www.tolerance.org" is part of the SPLC, a very different outfit. Here's a link to the over 1000 weblinks to "religioustolerance...
Click to read more »case are now readily available from neutral sites around the Web (not just SPLC or Patriot sites). This should help clear up the NPOV problems. 95% of the...
Click to read more »The Barnes Review Volume 9 from 2003, but since they are described by the SPLC as "one of the most virulent anti-Semitic organizations around" and "dedicated...
Click to read more »days of press, so it doesn't qualify as sustained coverage. Knowing the SPLC is taking it seriously is some indication we may see more coverage in the...
Click to read more »liberal political narrative on race (as forwarded by organisations such as the SPLC) which the article employs as a fig leaf of plausible cover. It was created...
Click to read more »supremacist is not a good thing, and we can leave the "monitoring" to the SPLC and other noble ventures. There is no "notability": there is only popularity...
Click to read more »incure prejudice, and lead to shootings of innocent people just like the SPLC hate maps. It is time we stopped allowing liberals to lie about other people...
Click to read more »notoriety during the last riots,this group has already been identified by the SPLC, and his activities doesnt seem that decrease, and could be generator of...
Click to read more »attribute opinion, check for due weight", in other words similar to WP:SPLC. If you want its addition on RSP, it would require either a RfC or at least...
Click to read more »Their reaction to the SPLC calling them a hate group? --GRuban (talk) 01:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC) It's being cited in the SPLC article as a response to...
Click to read more »enough for a short article specifically dealing with "Joel's Army", but the SPLC source doesn't say anything about "Kingdom Now theology". MastCell Talk 20:12...
Click to read more »He must not be a very important racist, since I couldn't find him on the SPLC's website. How sad for him--that would have increased his notability somewhat...
Click to read more »be a better title when it has very little actual usage outside of a 2003 SPLC intelligence report? Sourcing is difficult on both articles, and both articles...
Click to read more »is an in-depth report by a respected organization, however we often view SPLC/ADL reports as primaryish. ref18 - JPOST reporting on ADL's report (which...
Click to read more »articles at ABC News, the NY Daily News, the Telegraph, the ADL and the SPLC, among others. We may not like them, but they're notable. Station1 (talk)...
Click to read more »that has not had significant coverage in the press or in reliable sources. SPLC only is quoting someone using it and does not have substantial coverage of...
Click to read more »Church and School, Macomb, MI (edit, talk, history, links) — http://www.splcs.com/wp/church/history/. MadmanBot reporting at 02:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Center] got involved in the controversy - the source doesn't even mention SPLC! I also removed a bunch of uncited claims. The removal was fully justified...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This topic is currently sourced only to primary sources. Even the SPLC source only quotes Pierce's essay on the subject. Whilst there are plenty...
Click to read more »03:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Keep notable for the federal court decision, see SPLC Seraphim System (talk) 05:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »about white supremacists.Amyzex (talk) 18:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC) That's the SPLC's job, and I fully support them in it. But it's not our role to create a special...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC) The word is now subject to a report by the SPLC [22] '''tAD''' (talk) 22:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC) Keep. This source alone...
Click to read more »local Roanoke newspaper article ([44]) is about him, sort of, as well as SPLC Intelligence report (but then, they cover just about every racist group in...
Click to read more »Jason from nyc (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC) The only source is the SPLC which is a reliable source (several discussions on this, all agree that it...
Click to read more »not valid arguments. Of course some individuals or political groups like SPLC and ADL do not like them but their point of view is just another point of...
Click to read more »notability. --neonwhite user page talk 05:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC) The ADL and SPLC are the premier organisations in this area. However, wherever possible, such...
Click to read more »such as 6 and 7 are very solid. There are also several articles from the SPLC here. Overall, passes GNG. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »become truly notable within militia social circles, but only AFTER the ADL, SPLC and Homeland Security gave them free publicity (My inside sources explain...
Click to read more »the same way SPLC is used. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 10:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC) Ah, I believe the argument was raised that SPLC was a SPS as...
Click to read more »think the article in question is more than clear enough that groups like the SPLC consider it to be a magazine of a White Supremacist organization.Naraht (talk)...
Click to read more »gentleman? (talk) 22:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC) The SPLC is a very reliable source for the opinions of the SPLC. ( hint ) Squidfryerchef (talk) 23:53, 22 July...
Click to read more »00:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Weak keep. It did get some coverage by the SPLC ([24], [25]) and similar organizations[26], and it seems to important amongst...
Click to read more »here is that the foundation funded groups designated by hate groups by the SPLC, which could obviously be implied from their anti-immigration stance. This...
Click to read more »independent reliable sources. The only significant coverage is from the SPLC, here:[34] The article also links to articles from the Washington Post and...
Click to read more »that) because SPLC say so. And it just so happens that they have to be wrong in order for SPLC to win in court. This is effectively giving SPLC a supervote...
Click to read more »Myung Moon newspaper. Oddly, some of his work included, according to the SPLC, sympathetic coverage of the neo-confederate League of the South, to which...
Click to read more »anyone knows what anti-Catholicism is, it's the Catholic League. If the SPLC can define "hate groups", then the CL can point out anti-Catholicism. They've...
Click to read more »for example) or only mention her in passing. She has a profile with the SPLC, but that's not a newspiece. I don't know much about the Independent Political...
Click to read more »about PUAs, MRAs, internet trolls, standup comedians, and feminists. And the SPLC report is primarily about men's rights activists, not MGTOW, and also only...
Click to read more »20:49, 14 January 2011 (UTC) Delete. He's one of many right-wingers that the SPLC doesn't like (and probably with good cause) but I can't see how he's notable...
Click to read more »Egregious WP:POVFORK. This is not a category of hate group used by the SPLC, so there would need to be some extraordinary sourcing treating this as a...
Click to read more »presently has three primary sources and a drop-in advertisement for the SPLC. The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do...
Click to read more »Mosaic Project" are both pretty reliable sources. The only criticism of SPLC has come from actual hate sites. The American Mosaic Project is the Department...
Click to read more »And the Hill's coverage was an opinion piece by a representative of an SPLC-designated hate group. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »constitutes a NPOV. Theredproject (talk) 20:48, 18 July 2015 (UTC) No. The SPLC blog posting is not an "NPOV." It is an attack on Aardweg. In effect, you...
Click to read more »discussing the subject in detail, Black supremacy is not. Other the the SPLC, there is little indepth coverage of the subject. Senegambianamestudy (talk)...
Click to read more »a 3 day page lock for edit warring have been still trying to include an SPLC label in the Duck Dynasty article that has been the subject of mass debate...
Click to read more »blogs (e.g. DailyKos) or organizations that identify hate groups (e.g. ADL, SPLC). These sources only mention the website in brief blog posts or in off-hand...
Click to read more »now, due to the fact that the views he endorses are the kind of views the SPLC and ADL (as well as most people) find repugnant. Another red flag is that...
Click to read more »The SPLC is the antithesis of a reliable source for anything, and its use to support that anyone is notable I will question long and hard. The SPLC engages...
Click to read more »♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 02:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Being mentioned by SPLC also does not constitute nontrivial coverage, and in fact the guidline syays...
Click to read more »sources/Noticeboard/Archive 130 (section SPLC examined by RSN and by outside experts) The SPLC is certainly a reliable source for whom the SPLC classifies as hate groups...
Click to read more »racists, anti-Semites, conspiracy theorists, etc. The fact that neither the SPLC or the ADL (let alone the news media) have covered him in detail indicates...
Click to read more »BLP concerns are not significant; the SPLC is widely cited on these kinds of issues. A brief mention of SPLC's statement is okay per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV....
Click to read more »enemies and article does not include sympathetic sources. Some sources like SPLC are inherently unreliable as sources for facts but can be used as sources...
Click to read more »to minorities, but it not inherently anti-minority in a hostile minor. (SPLC actually describes the issues around that pretty well, as it being more "pro-white"...
Click to read more »17:15, 24 March 2018 (UTC) While we can source that SPLC catalogs the group as a hate group using the SPLC directly, we should be putting that in context of...
Click to read more »pass-up the opportunity to throw shade at the SPLC, but comparing Manhattan Institute/City Journal to the SPLC is unworkable. Readers do not generally know...
Click to read more »being Wikipedians. Wired: race and gender Manstead: no mention of Wikipedia SPLC: is about fringe and racism Nguyen: is about a study of Wikipedia users to...
Click to read more »and unique category of this classification does. I am surprised why the SPLC reference, number 12, was classified as unreliable, this stikes me as a solid...
Click to read more »Salon, Salon twice, Breitbart, Daily Kos, Daily Beast, Washington Post, SPLC, and The New York Times, but no indication of lasting significance. That...
Click to read more »the group, I cannot find anything they wrote about Looveer. Also, the ADL, SPLC and Searchlight have no articles about her. The problem is that we do not...
Click to read more »terrorism," although they discuss the phenomenon. Interestingly, a search of the SPLC website, a page with a vast amount of both news coverage and analysis of...
Click to read more »