Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
navigation (e.g. all disambiguation pages and some lists). Shortcut WP:SPIPWP:SPIP Publication in a reliable source is not always good evidence of notability...
Click to read more »Link: lipietz.net/spip.php?article148. * Links added in this diff: lipietz.net/spip.php?article148 (47, 30, 20, 1) lipietz.net/spip.php?rubrique51 (47...
Click to read more »(diff - undo) - Link: www.non-fides.fr/spip.php?article4/. * Links added in this diff: www.non-fides.fr/spip.php?article4/ (56, 61, 46, 1) 2008-06-26...
Click to read more »fr:user:Sanao <-> korea-is-one.org (0%/0%/0% - Added link: www.korea-is-one.org/spip.php?article2708 (Monitored rule: \bone\.org - reason for monitoring \bone\...
Click to read more »myrmecofourmis.fr/spip.php?article52. * Links added in this diff: www.myrmecofourmis.fr/spip.php?article45 (4, 10, 2, 1) www.myrmecofourmis.fr/spip.php?article52...
Click to read more »Link: www.m-pep.org/spip.php?article621. * Links added in this diff: www.m-pep.org/spip.php?article636 (61, 44, 2, 1) www.m-pep.org/spip.php?article621 (61...
Click to read more »undo) - Link: www.humpath.com/spip.php?page=article&id_article=12639. * Links added in this diff: www.humpath.com/spip.php?page=article&id_article=12639...
Click to read more »3, 1) www.gipri.ch/spip/spip.php?article576 (15, 34, 12, 1) www.gipri.ch/spip/spip.php?article578 (15, 34, 12, 1) www.gipri.ch/spip...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.larepublica.es/spip.php/ecrire/ecrire/spip.php?article1662 (R/Xmeta/L) User is in trusted groups sysop,...
Click to read more »- undo) - Link: www.altritaliani.net/spip.php?article264. * Links added in this diff: www.altritaliani.net/spip.php?article264 (6, 25, 6, 2) 2009-11-08...
Click to read more »économique des États de l'Afrique de l'Ouest (diff !top) - Link: www.lefaso.net/spip.php?article46491&rubrique363 (R/Xmeta/L) 2012-02-19 18:31:49 (UTC): w:de:User:Kyselak...
Click to read more »Link: ellynn.fr/dessousdebruxelles/spip.php?article129. * Links added in this diff: ellynn.fr/dessousdebruxelles/spip.php?article129 (1, 5, 1, 0) 2010-02-23...
Click to read more »to w:fr:Piotr Archinov (diff !top) - Link: www.alternativelibertaire.org/spip.php?article1377 (R/Xmeta/L) 2008-07-02 10:29:22 (UTC): w:fr:User:82.230.88...
Click to read more »Link: www.psychologie-positive.net/spip.php?rubrique13. * Links added in this diff: www.psychologie-positive.net/spip.php?rubrique13 (6, 7, 6, 1) 2009-10-20...
Click to read more »w:it:Naufragio della F174 (diff !top) - Link: coordination-maree-noire.eu/spip.php?rubrique524 (R/Xmeta/L) 2008-06-13 16:31:37 (UTC): User ClueBot t • c •...
Click to read more »fr/spip.php?article146. * Links added in this diff: institut-est-ouest.ens-lsh.fr/spip.php?article121 (18, 20, 18, 2) institut-est-ouest.ens-lsh.fr/spip...
Click to read more »sistoeurs.net/spip.php?article294. * Links added in this diff: www.sistoeurs.net/spip.php?auteur17 (30, 7, 6, 1) www.sistoeurs.net/spip.php?article478...
Click to read more »gillesjobin.com/spip.php?rubrique22. * Links added in this diff: www.gillesjobin.com/spip.php?rubrique18 (21, 19, 18, 1) www.gillesjobin.com/spip.php?page=home...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.flamencoweb.fr/spip/spip.php?article168 (R/Xmeta/L) User is in a trusted group sysop on some wikis...
Click to read more »d'histoire nordique (diff !top) - Link: w3.framespa.univ-tlse2.fr/boutique/spip/spip.php?article197 (R/Xmeta/L) 2011-05-06 14:11:09 (UTC): w:fr:User:Sgurcit...
Click to read more »(diff - undo) - Link: zonekaos.net/ode/spip.php?article186. * Links added in this diff: zonekaos.net/ode/spip.php?article186 (49, 6, 2, 1) 2009-06-18...
Click to read more »lalorraine.net/spip.php?rubrique3. * Links added in this diff: www.lalorraine.net/spip.php?rubrique2 (11, 11, 11, 1) www.lalorraine.net/spip.php?rubrique3...
Click to read more »nl:user:MoiraMoira <-> kabylia.info (0%/0%/0% - Added link: www.kabylia.info/observer/spip.php?article107 (Monitored rule: \bkabylia\.info - reason for monitoring \bkabylia\...
Click to read more »mabeloctobre.net/spip.php?rubrique36. * Links added in this diff: www.mabeloctobre.net/spip.php?rubrique36 (11, 12, 11, 1) www.mabeloctobre.net/spip.php?rubrique36...
Click to read more »- undo) - Link: olmestourisme.free.fr/spip.php?article1. * Links added in this diff: olmestourisme.free.fr/spip.php?article1 (30, 15, 15, 1) 2009-07-15...
Click to read more »pt:user:Biancawild <-> ciranda.net (27.7%/27.7%/7.6% - Added link: www.ciranda.net/spip/article1821.html (Monitored rule: \bciranda\.net - reason for monitoring...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff top?) - Link: inequalitywatch.eu/spip.php?article99 (R/Xmeta/L) 2014-01-10 18:32:27 (UTC): User FredrickS t • c •...
Click to read more »c; 4) to w:fr:EuropaBio (diff !top) - Link: dessousdebruxelles.ellynn.fr/spip.php?article31 (R/Xmeta/L) 2010-07-27 07:15:29 (UTC): w:fr:User:85.169.119...
Click to read more »<-> histoirepassion.eu (0%/0%/0% - Monitored link www.histoirepassion.eu/spip.php?article659 - rule: \bhistoirepassion\.eu - reason: Automonitor: conflict...
Click to read more »(diff - undo) - Link: www.artehis.eu/spip.php?article282&var_mode=calcul. * Links added in this diff: www.artehis.eu/spip.php?article282&var_mode=calcul (5...
Click to read more »c; 274) to w:fr:Yoshiharu Tsuge (diff !top) - Link: www.ego-comme-x.com/spip.php?article151 (R/Xmeta/L) 2008-08-16 21:20:23 (UTC): User Sylblican t •...
Click to read more »Lauxerois (diff !top) - Link: ks39417.kimsufi.com/spip.php?article159&var_mode=calculks39417.kimsufi.com/spip.php?article159&var_mode=calcul (R/Xmeta/L- removed)...
Click to read more »(diff - undo) - Link: www.revoltes.net/spip.php?rubrique31. * Links added in this diff: www.revoltes.net/spip.php?rubrique31 (1, 15, 1, 1) 2008-10-20...
Click to read more »to w:fr:Henri Temple (diff !top) - Link: www.dynamiques-du-droit.cnrs.fr/spip.php?article665 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2016-05-07 08:44:36 (UTC): w:fr:User:34...
Click to read more »c; 20) to w:fr:Johan van der Keuken (diff !top) - Link: www.derives.tv/spip.php?article75 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2008-06-16 00:30:53 (UTC): w:fr:User:82...
Click to read more »page. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:SPIP. [2] Company page. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:SPIP. [] Unable to open. [3] Company page. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:SPIP. [4] Press-release. Dependent...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is routine announcements, WP:SPIP sourcing such as yourstory.com and other sources otherwise not suitable for...
Click to read more »Unida de les Illes Balears (diff !top) - Link: www.tercerainformacion.es/spip.php?article15859 (R/Xmeta/L) 2012-01-23 11:27:45 (UTC): w:es:User:Etanol...
Click to read more »responsable (diff). Links: www.ecologistasenaccion.org/spip.php?article9648 www.ecologistasenaccion.org/spip.php?article1111&artsuite=0. 2007-12-15 18:27:45:...
Click to read more »(t - c; 2) to w:fr:Thierry Bouchard (diff top?) - Link: editionsfario.fr/spip.php?article142 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2014-12-20 21:00:23 (UTC): w:fr:User:92...
Click to read more »notices and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC) Delete - There are some non-SPIP references out...
Click to read more »fichier) (diff - undo) - Link: clic0.free.fr/spip.php?article81. * Links added in this diff: clic0.free.fr/spip.php?article81 (6, 8, 6, 1) 2008-12-21 07:55:54...
Click to read more »c; 23256) to w:fr:Challenge ÉducÉco (diff !top) - Link: www.educeco.net/spip.php?article1006 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2018-06-10 12:08:07 (UTC): w:pl:User:SKNMM...
Click to read more »sources presented there were not convincing, being of the same routing / WP:SPIP added) variery. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:25, 14 September 2018 (UTC) Update:...
Click to read more »article is cited to passing mentions, PR materials, oline directories, and WP:SPIP sources. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:46, 30 December...
Click to read more »to w:fr:Christian VIII de Danemark (diff top) - Link: abolitions.free.fr/spip.php?article139 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2012-04-11 20:10:11 (UTC): w:fr:User:Acteonmako...
Click to read more »fr:Awélé (diff - undo) - Link: sarnold.free.fr/spip/spip.php?article50. * Links added in this diff: sarnold.free.fr/spip/spip.php?article50 (3, 5, 1, 1)...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff top?) - Link: www.anf29.org/spip.php?article177 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2019-05-10 08:48:53 (UTC): w:fa:User:Alirezatass...
Click to read more »c; 169) to w:de:Seilbahnen im ÃPNV (diff - DELETED) - Link: www.etusa.dz/spip.php?article10 (R/Xmeta/L) 2012-02-15 14:59:05 (UTC): w:de:User:80.243.160...
Click to read more »riannek.de/spip.php?article111. 2007-12-19 17:11:25: User de:88.66.226.141 (talk - contribs) to de:Atlas (Gebirge) (diff). Links: www.riannek.de/spip.php?article159...
Click to read more »02:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Delete I agree, in its present form it fails WP:SPIP and WP:NOT. References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails...
Click to read more »c; 3) to w:ja:アントニ・タピエス (diff !top) - Link: www.fundaciotapies.org/site/spip.php?rubrique64 (R/Xmeta/L) 2012-02-07 04:57:19 (UTC): w:ja:User:Obituarist21...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or routine company news. Created by Special:Contributions/Karinnika with...
Click to read more »frankly, the sources are: company SPIP (not even about the company, just quotes about the market); more SPIP; SPIP about one of their events; more investor...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete -- does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. Sourcing is mostly WP:SPIP, resulting in a highly promotional article, violating WP:NOT. K.e.coffman...
Click to read more »org/spip.php?article59. 2008-02-25 19:00:03: User fr:Gillesmille (talk - contribs) to fr:Naï (diff). Links: www.gilles.mille-et-une-vagues.org/spip.php...
Click to read more »from a single topic editor. Fails WP:SPIP Velella Velella Talk 09:29, 16 September 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPIP. Subject fails notability verified...
Click to read more »spam on a nn private company just going about its business. Sources are WP:SPIP and do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:31, 27 December 2017...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.biocis.u-psud.fr/spip.php?article332 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2011-11-27 20:35:53 (UTC): User 78...
Click to read more »6) to w:fr:Alexandre Zinoviev (diff !top) - Link: www.comite-valmy.org/spip.php?article4397 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2014-04-25 23:24:20 (UTC): w:es:User:112...
Click to read more »DogVacay; the coverage that comes up is not independent of the company and/or WP:SPIP, such as "DogVacay's Aaron Hirschhorn on how founders can control the .....
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:FAILN and WP:SPIP BeIsKr (talk) 18:29, 7 August 2012 (UTC) Delete - I found nothing at Google...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/JacobMoore...
Click to read more »indications of notability beyond being funded, overly promotional fails WP:SPIP. The references fail the criteria for establishing notability. The ones mentioned...
Click to read more »meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:05, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »only for a nn marketing agency; sourcing is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. The awards listed are not significant and well known. Fails WP:NCORP and...
Click to read more »page on an unremarkable company / app. Sources are in passing and / or WP:SPIP; citations include: "Working at Kolu". Glassdoor" -- seriously? Fails WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »0, 0) www.thenationalboxer.com/film/ (268, 6, 3, 2) www.blogotheque.net/spip.php?page=cae_all&lang=en (268, 93, 8, 2) temporaryareas.com/ (268, 7, 3,...
Click to read more »org/spip.php?breve38 (R/Xmeta/L) 2016-02-16 19:23:54 (UTC): w:fr:User:B-noa (t - c; -1) to w:fr:Halal (diff !top) - Link: www.asidcom.org/spip.php?article88...
Click to read more »Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; sources are passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC) Delete I cannot locate...
Click to read more »130 (t - c; 3) to w:fr:Paul Démann (diff top) - Link: iefr.univ-artois.fr/spip.php?article55&var_mode=recalcul (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2011-02-12 00:08:41...
Click to read more »0, 0) www.thenationalboxer.com/film/ (268, 6, 3, 2) www.blogotheque.net/spip.php?page=cae_all&lang=en (268, 92, 8, 2) temporaryareas.com/ (268, 6, 3,...
Click to read more »Globosat#Current_networks). Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is WP:SPIP and / or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »spam on a nn private company just going about its business. Sources are WP:SPIP and do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Fails appropriate notability guidelines. Includes...
Click to read more »which means it doesn't meet our standards to count towards notability per WP:SPIP. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Singificant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP and / or not independent of his company, Romulus Capital, the article on...
Click to read more »directory-like / promo page on an unremarkable private company. Sources are usual WP:SPIP suspects -- interviews, launch publicity, etc. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:TOOSOON...
Click to read more »artist written in the style of a resume, thus failing WP:NOTE due to WP:SPIP and WP:SOAP. Thus, it should be deleted. User:Kerl126 (talk) (contributions)...
Click to read more »html:. * Links added in this diff: www.relectures.org/spip.php?article22: (3, 19, 1, 1) bougnoulosophe.blogspot...
Click to read more »criteria for deletion. Along similar lines, this article seems to faili WP:SPIP since the only sources for the article are interviews and profiles of the...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. The company has 15 employees (according...
Click to read more »intellectually independent sources. Article is also promotional, fails WP:SPIP. References fail WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. -- HighKing++ 16:17, 8 December...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete -- Sources fail WP:ORGDEPTH, being passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP coverage. The page exists to promote the event and its organizers. An apparent...
Click to read more »TWL) An unremarkable coworking space; sources are in passing and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Download currently indef blocked for undisclosed...
Click to read more »spam on a nn company. Sourcing is in passing, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. G11 / TNT applies. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »passing and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC) Keep There is plenty of WP:SIGCOV, neither in passing nor WP:SPIP: Premier Lotto...
Click to read more »to w:fr:Alliance française de Moldavie (diff !top) - Link: www.alfr.md/spip.php?lang=fr§ion=3&subsection=9&article=37 (R/Xmeta/L) 2011-08-11 11:11:06...
Click to read more »The state at the moment of the deletion proposal hints at issues with WP:SPIP. It will likely fail WP:NTV. Maybe sockpuppet-made, see Special:CentralAuth/Ronald3456...
Click to read more »announcements, WP:SPIP or otherwise not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Delete Promotional, fails WP:SPIP. Also, no...
Click to read more »the Baháʼí faith in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The article is bordering on WP:SPIP as the article discusses the Baháʼí faith in general and its persecution...
Click to read more »The notability is borderline at best with most of the sources failing WP:SPIP. Rentier (talk) 19:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »iffrinittran.net (22.77%/5.4%/1.2% - Added link: www.iffrinittran.net/monde/spip.php?rubrique1 (Monitored rule: \biffrinittran\.net - reason for monitoring...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found. Sources present in the article are WP:SPIP or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »vote on this one, because right now it is obviously a COI and violates WP:SPIP. I do, however, think that the page might have potential if written properly...
Click to read more »lacks notablility (WP:GNG), the article appears to be self-promotional (WP:SPIP), and the bulk of edits appear to have been made by accounts that are solely...
Click to read more »company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, and routine funding news. Created by Special:Contributions/Encomiast3 with...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff top?) - Link: www.pharmacie.univ-paris5.fr/spip.php?article2393 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2014-07-01 13:50:03 (UTC): w:fr:User:Hkabla...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff top?) - Link: inequalitywatch.eu/spip.php?article99 (R/Xmeta/L) 2014-01-10 18:32:27 (UTC): User FredrickS t • c •...
Click to read more »discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 15:13, 22 August...
Click to read more »coverage (not SPIP or paid). Norlk (talk) 12:05, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Comment please provide the non-contributor Forbes video, Google Books and non-SPIP reliable...
Click to read more »w:fr:Villefranche-de-Rouergue (diff top?) - Link: www.villefranchederouergue.fr/spip.php?rubrique75 (R/Xmeta/L) 2014-04-24 14:22:44 (UTC): w:fr:User:Chevalier...
Click to read more »insufficient to establish notability, mainly for the reasons pointed out at WP:SPIP. SoWhy 10:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Earlybird Venture Capital (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »subject of media coverage, in sources other than her own self-published WP:SPIP, to qualify for an article on here. Bearcat (talk) 06:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NSOFT and WP:SPIP. only non-promo news seems to be reuters article on company capitalization...
Click to read more »of independent, in-depth coverage; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources are all WP:SPIP and / or future looking as in "Eckovation to build a full-blown social learning...
Click to read more »company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR-driven / WP:SPIP. Raised $6 in funding which strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia...
Click to read more »indications of notability or significance. Entirely promotional article with WP:SPIP sourcing. I requested a speedy deletion under G11; let's see if it takes...
Click to read more »indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Promotional, fails WP:SPIP. Wikipedia is not a platform for advertising. -- HighKing++ 11:56, 5 October...
Click to read more »were presented, but most editors here felt some of the sources failed WP:SPIP or WP:ORGIND, and in aggregate, they failed WP:CORPDEPTH. -- RoySmith (talk)...
Click to read more »Bearian (talk) 22:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC) Delete - Agree. Looks like WP:SPIP. Cannot find any independent verifiable sources either. Mediavalia (talk)...
Click to read more »company. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH; sources are in passing and / or WP:SPIP. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.southern-laos.com/spip.php?article1 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2015-12-03 03:59:02 (UTC): User Benolaos...
Click to read more »01:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Delete both -- entirely promotional with WP:SPIP sourcing. Promo content includes: "Fernandez has also often appeared as a...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP (such as YourStory.com), or not independent of the company. The latter is...
Click to read more »advertising platform nor an alternative to a corporate website. Fails WP:SPIP. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 18:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Written like an advert, fails WP:SPIP. No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing++ 20:49...
Click to read more »Delete: Fails notability as per WP:ORG and reads like self-promotion per WP:SPIP.--Michaela den (talk) 09:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »11:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Delete -- a nn product with correspondingly WP:SPIP sources. No evidence of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:53...
Click to read more »Absolutely no evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG. Clear example of WP:SPIP. Unless an independent source is found covering this subject, I'm not even...
Click to read more »Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG: no coverage in reliable sources outside of WP:SPIP, the references are press releases and rehashes of press releases. Rentier...
Click to read more »2007-12-08 22:07:56: User fr:Alain Bouthier (talk - contribs) to fr:Anacole Daalderop (diff). Links: reseau.parental.free.fr/spip/spip.php?article65....
Click to read more »7815) to w:vi:Lý Thái Hùng (diff !top) - Link: www.dongautaivietnam.com/spip.php?rubrique5 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2025-07-20 00:52:52 (UTC): User Area5K...
Click to read more »avaluche.com/spip.php?article386.. 2007-12-23 06:20:06: User es:Avaluche (talk - contribs) to es:Aluche (diff). Links: www.avaluche.com/spip.php?article4...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:WEB. Awards are not significant / well known...
Click to read more »| links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.sorbonne-av-anciens.org/spip.php?article346 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2011-10-27 14:54:40 (UTC): w:fr:User:193...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete -- fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. Bases on routine and / or WP:SPIP sourcing and exists for promotional purposes. No value to the project; very...
Click to read more »submitted area. Article cited to passing mentions, routine corporate news, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman (talk)...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP and WP:SPIP. -- HighKing++ 14:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »sources: * [23] Dependent. Non-RS. Fails WP:SIRS * [24] Press-release. Fails WP:SPIP and WP:SIRS. Non-RS. * [25] Another press-release. Non-RS. * MGM-GVC’s US...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:50, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »found; what comes up is routine funding / acquisition news items and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Policy Forum per nom. This is not notable, and it has a promotional tone. WP:SPIP at best. wumbolo ^^^ 13:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC) Delete The way this article...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, and fails WP:SPIP. Article contains no sources, and looks professionally written by a paid...
Click to read more »only product of the company, "Cashsoft Money Manager". Clear breach of WP:SPIP. No sources online or on googlebooks. Markerdryer (talk) 21:00, 7 April 2012...
Click to read more »topic. Article cited to routine corporate news, funding announcements and WP:SPIP sources, such as Y Combinator itself. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 19:04, 15 December...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.southern-laos.com/spip.php?article1 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2015-12-03 03:59:02 (UTC): User Benolaos...
Click to read more »19 December 2017 (UTC) Delete as corporate spam; borders on G11 with WP:SPIP sourcing and promo content. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete Corporate Spam, possibly qualifies for a speedy delete. Fails WP:SPIP, no indications of notability, fails GNG, fails WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 16:09...
Click to read more »article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »Snowycats (talk) 03:50, 15 July 2018 (UTC) Delete Agree with above. Fails WP:SPIP and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 12:08, 15 July 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:SPIP and failing WP:NOPAGE.Blue Riband► 14:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC) Relisted to...
Click to read more »June 2013 (UTC) Delete per failing WP:GNG and WP:ORG. See: WP:PROMO and WP:SPIP. — Ched : ? 18:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »is a promotional and it seems advertisement should be deleted as per WP:SPIP. Sehmeet singh (talk) 16:20, 19 July 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?rubrique27 (R/Xmeta/L) 2010-04-07 16:25:24 (UTC): w:fr:User:88.176.58...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SPIP, fails notability test. Very limited outside sources or citations. Only notable...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete Looks spammy and reads like an advert to me - fails WP:SPIP. Also, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or not independent of the company. Not notable as a podcaster either. Created...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Largely vanity, self-written; WP:SPIP Woodshed (talk) 03:41, 31 March 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is in passing, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. --K.e.coffman (talk) 09:19, 13 January 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »article promotes the founders and the services, entirely promotional, fails WP:SPIP. References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:ORGIND...
Click to read more »discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND as they all rely on quotations...
Click to read more »verts92.net/article.php3?id_article=441 (94, 4, 4, 4) multitudes.samizdat.net/spip.php?article1145 (94, 46, 6, 3) multitudes.samizdat.net/auteur254.html (94...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Entirely promotional fails WP:SPIP. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability and...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is routine corporate notices, WP:SPIP and / or passing mentions. Having raised $5 million in venture funding is...
Click to read more »Article was created by a single-purpose account which strongly suggests WP:SPIP. Newslinger (talk) 11:48, 17 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Third-party references stem from local press coverage that is WP:SPIP and/or WP:ROUTINE. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, Wikipedia is WP:NOTYELLOW. Yogiile...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and WP:SPIP sourcing. Article cited to similar sources. Created by...
Click to read more »establishing notability. Entirely promotional. Fails GNG, WP:NCORP and WP:SPIP. -- HighKing++ 14:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Is he/she office bearer of any institutions?. It is a true example of WP:SPIP. Fails WP:AUTHOR,WP:ANYBIO. Even if it is notable, it fails, 'Stand-alone...
Click to read more »article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »as all roles are non-starring. Sources are passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. WP:TOOSOON, per review of available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:35, 12...
Click to read more »RS coverage not found; article is cited to passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP sources. For a related AfD, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collision...
Click to read more »all company announcements, fails WP:ORGIND. Entirely promotional, fails WP:SPIP. -- HighKing++ 15:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »never intellectually independent, and thus doesn't meet the standards of WP:SPIP or WP:ORGIND. For the record, the article shows all the signs of a COI/PAID...
Click to read more »organization's personnel as story sources". No WP:ORGIND sources and clear WP:SPIP. Company hasn't received enough coverage to be considered notable. Nihlus...
Click to read more »not found. Article is sourced to passing mentions, WP:PRIMARY and / or WP:SPIP sources. Created by Special:Contributions/Parth.shah3593 currently indef...
Click to read more »paris.fr/public/article.tpl?id=2178 www.apege.com/spip/article.php3?id_article=36 www.apege.com/spip/article.php3?id_article=36. 2007-10-24 03:23:30: User...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Nothing but an ad. Faiols WP:SPIP. Fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing++ 18:29, 3 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Delete. Non notable--MassiveYR ♠ 20:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP and WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 16:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or not independent of the company. Not notable as an author either. Created...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) The references can be updated, if wanted. Delete per nom and WP:SPIP. This BLP does not meet WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO; cited sources do not meet...
Click to read more »article is cited to online directories, commercial websites, and other WP:SPIP sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO /...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, it fails WP:GNG, also note that this might be a case of WP:SPIP--MaxEspinho (talk) 17:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Merge/rename/create Gambling...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH. SamHolt6 (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 15:00, 22 August...
Click to read more »promotional in nature. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:GNG. Sources re mostly WP:SPIP or otherwise not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:29, 22 December...
Click to read more »companies that invested in this one. Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages. Fails WP:SPIP. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing++ 16:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »Article is sourced to routine notices about the company, interviews, WP:SPIP and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created by...
Click to read more »page on an unremarkable private company. Sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Scwiki3 with no other contributions outside...
Click to read more »company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, and routine funding news. Created by Special:Contributions/Kiwi0wl with...
Click to read more »RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, hyper-local, WP:SPIP and / or not independent of the company, which is non-notable either. Does...
Click to read more »indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Also advertorial and fails WP:SPIP. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a corporate web page, nor is it a platform...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 20:47, 19 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP and GNG. References fail WP:ORGIND, are promotional or rely on company material...
Click to read more »private company going about its business. Sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. Awards are not significant. Does not meet WP:NORG / WP:ORGDEPTH. K.e.coffman...
Click to read more »deletion/Kairos Society. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is WP:SPIP, interviews, passing mentions, and other self-promotion. K.e.coffman (talk)...
Click to read more »'cruft on a company that's not yet achieved anything of note. Sources are WP:SPIP / fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikipedia is not a free means of promoting the company's...
Click to read more »above Andrevan@ 00:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC) Delete The article borders on WP:SPIP in that it appears to be written as an autobiography. The article lists his...
Click to read more »meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPOL or WP:NAUTHOR. Coverage is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. In general, promo 'cruft. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion for nn individuals...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is PR-driven material based on WP:SPIP sources such as: "Q&A: UpCodes co-founder Scott Reynolds on a new way to...
Click to read more »sourced. SamHolt6 (talk) 02:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 20:05, 20 July...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff top) - Link: www.ernwaca.org/panaf/spip.php?article1903 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2012-01-17 11:21:10 (UTC): w:fr:User:196...
Click to read more »"Investors don't just like LikeALittle a little, they like it a lot."" Fails WP:SPIP. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 14:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No substantial coverage outside of WP:SPIP, fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. Possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON. Rentier (talk)...
Click to read more »business. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or Yellow Pages. Fails WP:SPIP. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 15:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »think it may be a case of WP:SPIP. MisterRichValentine (talk) 18:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC) This is not a case of WP:SPIP. I am not Jeff Mach, nor does...
Click to read more »ribbon on sports day? WP:LISTN applies to this too and it fails under WP:SPIP. Legacypac (talk) 10:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »an unremarkable executive. Sources include trivial mentions and / or WP:SPIP coverage, as in: "Fingerpaint Founder Recounts Road to Success!" in The Daily...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP. Article is also overly promotional both in tone and content, fails WP:SPIP. HighKing++ 18:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - Sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »coverage not found. Article cited to online directories, passing metions, WP:SPIP or other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created and edited...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Entirely promotional fails WP:SPIP, references are company announcements and PR, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND...
Click to read more »wider audience and a more convincing conclusion. The article is marked for SPIP and peacocking. Sources exist, but secondary and tertiary sources (to this...
Click to read more »advertising, with no indications of significance or notability and exclusively WP:SPIP sources. I requested a deletion under G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Budha_Everyday with few other contributions...
Click to read more »Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 16:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP, complete spam. Topic has no indications of notabilty - another run-of-the-mill...
Click to read more »North America1000 00:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Delete Article fails WP:SPIP and GNG. References fail the criteria for establishing notability WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »ferret (talk) 12:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SPIP, no indications of notability. -- HighKing++ 11:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP. -- HighKing++ 11:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. Article cited passing mentions, blogs, WP:SPIP and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or not independent of the company. Created by Special:Contributions/Foc...
Click to read more »topic of the reliable source. Additionally this article might fall under WP:SPIP. Therefore, I am proposing that the article be deleted at this time, as perhaps...
Click to read more »Also article seems to be written in an unduly promotional tone as per WP:SPIP. Ochiwar (talk) 07:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Notability is mostly established...
Click to read more »RS coverage not found; article is cited to passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP sources. For a related AfD, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collision...
Click to read more »coverage not found. Sourcing is in passing, unselective databases, and / or WP:SPIP. "4th Best Film at the Pink Grand Prix" is not a significant award as it's...
Click to read more »94.8.98.105 (talk) 23:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC) Strong delete fails WP:SPIP. ArcAngel (talk) ) 09:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Sengupta...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found, what comes up is routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Raising $35M in venture funding is not an indicator of notability. K.e.coffman...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 07:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 14:56, 22 August...
Click to read more »to meet the required criteria, zero indications of notability, fails WP:SPIP. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 14:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Singificant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP and / or not independent of his company, the article on which was deleted...
Click to read more »Link: www.la-gargouille.org/spip.php?page=articlec&id_article=52. * Links added in this diff: www.la-gargouille.org/spip.php?page=articlec&id_article=52...
Click to read more »speedy: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:17, 2 July 2018 (UTC) Delete. Primary...
Click to read more »interest/Noticeboard/Archive 128#WP:COIN if not WP:PAID?. Case of WP:COI, WP:SPAM, and WP:SPIP. — Newslinger talk 16:07, 30 July 2018 (UTC) @Newslinger: Discussions merged...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as per nom. References fail WP:NCORP and the article fails WP:SPIP. HighKing++ 17:37, 15 August 2018 (UTC) Delete absolute WP:CORPSPAM Chetsford...
Click to read more »management software. All of the references are either PR churn excluded by WP:SPIP and WP:ORGIND or blogs and other non-RS sourcing that also doesn't count...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 09:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP and WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 13:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:34, 3 September...
Click to read more »TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:GROUP,, WP:NMUSIC, and fails WP:SPIP. Article contains no sources, and looks professionally written by a paid...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Delete -- WP:PROMO & fails WP:CORPDEPTH; sources are routine, WP:SPIP, etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »France. Shellwood (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2022 (UTC) delete. Reason: WP:SPIP and WP:SIGCOV. The page specifically lacks "significant coverage" and is...
Click to read more »coverage not found; what comes up is routine news; passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC) Weak...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or not independent of the company. Created by Special:Contributions/ZeldaChild...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:N & WP:SPIP; Google returned no independent sources. gwendy (talk) 21:05, 9 April 2017...
Click to read more »Barely even passing mentions is the scant references given. Also, complete WP:SPIP in the article's creation and editing. ExRat (talk) 10:50, 13 September 2021...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. Cited to itself / WP:SPIP sources and does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. I requested a speedy deletion under...
Click to read more »contributions outside the topic, and sources to the company itself or unsuitable WP:SPIP sources. I've requested a speedy deletion under G11; let's see if it takes...
Click to read more »December 2017 (UTC) Delete Agree with nom and K.e.coffman above. Fails WP:SPIP and GNG. References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails...
Click to read more »to meet WP:CORPDEPTH not found. What comes up is routine notices and WP:SPIP sources. WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources: the company exists but...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Budha_Everyday with few other contributions...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »(talk/contribs) 19:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Agree with nom, fails WP:SPIP WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing++ 17:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »America1000 03:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Delete Entirely promotional, fails WP:SPIP. The "Corporate Culture" section is a joke! References fail the criteria...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete -- SPA created (Special:Contributions/Felice_von_Wilhert) & WP:SPIP sourcing. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:AUTHOR. Coverage is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. A highly promotional article on an unremarkable business executive, so best...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »does not meet WP:NCORP. Sourcing offered above is in passing and / ot WP:SPIP, insufficient for establishing notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:22, 9 February...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:N, WP:SPIP, WP:SOURCES. Self sourcing their own website, press releases, etc. Possible...
Click to read more »marketing-alternatif.com/. * Links added in this diff: www.non-fides.fr/spip.php?article23 (123, 157, 105, 2) www.marketing-alternatif.com/ (123, 6, 2...
Click to read more »speedy: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:33, 2 July 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This appears to be WP:SPIP. Wikipedia:Notability_(cryptocurrencies) would suggest this is not a notable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a platform for business listings. Fails WP:NOT and WP:SPIP. -- HighKing++ 13:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC) Delete - I can't find any media...
Click to read more »"Concept". Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or fund-raising. Fails WP:SPIP and GNG. References fail the criteria for establishing notability and fail...
Click to read more »Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Yet another online marketplace startup using Wikipedia for advertising....
Click to read more »Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 16:40, 25 August...
Click to read more »and "public policy thinker". What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Notability is not inherited from the subject's father, Ajit Doval. There's...
Click to read more »Bishonen | talk 02:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC). Delete Agree with nom. Fails WP:SPIP. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 15:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, interviews, WP:SPIP and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Affiliated with...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found, what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. References in the article are self-published, promotional, or unselective...
Click to read more »indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Also advertorial fails WP:SPIP. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a corporate web page, nor is it a platform...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 08:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 14:54, 22...
Click to read more »citations are to the company itself; the rest are directories and / or WP:SPIP. I requested a G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:02, 22 December...
Click to read more »who does not meet WP:BIO. Sourcing is in passing. Article is in odor of WP:SPIP. The creator has very few contributions in wiki outside of this topic. WP:TOOSOON...
Click to read more »23:22, 20 May 2018 (UTC) Delete I agree, fails GNG and WP:NCORP (and WP:SPIP) HighKing++ 17:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »user who created the page also seems to suggest the article violates WP:SPIP. Michitaro (talk) 02:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »renneslechateau.it/rennes-le-chateau.php?sezione=guida&cap=86 notredamedeparis.fr/spip.php?article20 notredamedeparis.fr/ www.wikimapia.org/#y=48852989&x=2349878&z=18&l=0&m=s...
Click to read more »What comes up is passing mentions, routine funding notices and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Elenabriola with no other contributions...
Click to read more »found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine funding news and / or WP:SPIP. The company releases various ranking lists, which get some mentions, but...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or routine funding news. Created by Special:Contributions/Whistle.torrid...
Click to read more »are "Sapience partners this and adopts this" This is prime example of WP:SPIP generated by press releases and some references are merely called (duplicated)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising; strictly PR-driven / WP:SPIP sourcing and content. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:25, 23 December...
Click to read more »notability, no intellectually in-depth references on the company, fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing++ 11:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC) Delete per above...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP. Article currently reads like a catalogue and is promotional, fails WP:SPIP. The tribune.com.pk reference above is a passing mention and fails WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »comes up is passing mentions, quotes by the subject (i.e. [1]), and other WP:SPIP sources. Created by a banned sock (Special:Contributions/Jiahimedluke); pls...
Click to read more »internet sites I found are own website and council site. Is self-promotion WP:SPIP. EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC) Delete As above -...
Click to read more »DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC) Delete Almost all sources are WP:SPIP. There's barely any neutral coverage of this software at all (besides a single...
Click to read more »(2009 film)) was created by a WP:SPA, so I suspect there might be some WP:SPIP here. - GretLomborg (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »reliable sources. --Claritas § 21:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:SPIP. I researched Benjamin J. Broome, finding that he is a professor at ASU,...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, and / or not independent of the subject's company, which has been deleted...
Click to read more »Delete both: does not meet WP:NCORP. Sourcing is in passing and / ot WP:SPIP, insufficient for establishing notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:36, 9 February...
Click to read more »about the same time this article was created. This strongly suggests WP:SPIP. Newslinger (talk) 11:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC) Delete this haphazardly thrown...
Click to read more »website. I looked for additional sources and found award rosters and WP:SPIP in the pornography trade press, plus a few passing mentions elsewhere (one...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Corporate spam with zero indications of notability. Fails WP:SPIP. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND, topic fail GNG and WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »promotional, so it fails to establish notability per WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SPIP. The other is that it is spam created with the sole intent of promoting the...
Click to read more »is not such as to presume notability. Sources are in passing and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Download currently indef blocked for undisclosed...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. What comes are is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/NorthernLad79 with few other contributions...
Click to read more »press releases and press release reprints. Both of those are excluded by WP:SPIP and WP:ORGIND from counting towards notability. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:40...
Click to read more »company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR driven / WP:SPIP sources / launch publicity. The article includes a citations to WSJ [1],...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Delete -- Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH with sources being WP:SPIP and / or routine funding news. Unexplicably kept at the first AfD; should...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Cyounkins with no other contributions outside...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete -- an advertorial BLP, sourced to primary and / or WP:SPIP sources. Notability not established by the existing sources and there's nothing...
Click to read more »not found; what comes up is passing mentions, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Brahiim123 with no other contributions...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found, what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. References in the article are self-published, promotional, or unselective...
Click to read more »written by the author of the book, so it also feels quite a bit like WP:SPIP. Jmertel23 (talk) 23:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Delete - per everyone. As...
Click to read more »that doesn't make TV Tome itself notable enough for an article (per WP:SPIP). Prof. Squirrel (talk) 05:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC) Merge to TV.com. The...
Click to read more »of the publications, assuming they are real. This could be a case of WP:SPIP as perhaps it's intended to be her online CV (I'm not accusing the subject...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Bitpk with no other contributions outside...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP, such as self-promotional reports by the company. Does not meet WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP and WP:SPIP. References provided are either mentions-in-passing or rely too much on company...
Click to read more »Thanks, SoWhy 18:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC) Delete -- I'm only seeing WP:SPIP coverage; nn product. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. Fails WP:SPIP and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 13:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 15:12, 22 August...
Click to read more »indication of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Entirely promotional, fails WP:SPIP. -- HighKing++ 14:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC) Delete -- a minor brand / promotionalism...
Click to read more »sources meeting the standard of WP:CORPDEPTH and many of the sources being WP:SPIP. Rentier (talk) 13:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC) Speedy delete as G11 / promotional...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP and / or not independent of the subject's company, Campus Apartments. Created...
Click to read more »there are no sources to back it up or to rewrite it in a neutral manner. WP:SPIP. JBH (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Bkleinberg currently indef-blocked for...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Mokwepa...
Click to read more »editor to align the two. Readers should not need to try to do so. Likely WP:SPIP. Dwpaul Talk 16:36, 4 October 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »coverage not found. Sources present in the article are passing mentions, WP:SPIP, and / or directory listings. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »00:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Delete- No reliable sources, possibly a case of SPIP. Faizan (talk) 15:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Delete non-notable. sami talk 23:27...
Click to read more »promotionalism only: "under his leadership..." Etc. Sources are passing mentions, WP:SPIP and / or not independent on the company. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:59, 12 July...
Click to read more »undo) - Link: www.epl.nimes.educagri.fr/spip.php?rubrique9. * Links added in this diff: www.epl.nimes.educagri.fr/spip.php?rubrique9 (1, 7, 1, 1) 2009-08-07...
Click to read more »for this venture. AllyD (talk) 07:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP and WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 16:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: does not meet WP:NSOFT; sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:29, 16 December 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »indications of notability and worse, entirely promotional. Fails GNG, WP:SPIP and WP:NCORP, references fail the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++...
Click to read more »in passing as speaking for one of his clients. Fails WP:GNG, violates WP:SPIP. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 22:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »found; what comes up is a lot of self-promotion, interviews, and other WP:SPIP sources. Sourced to likewise unsuitable sources, some of which are routine...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Acquired by another company with...
Click to read more »Defence reviews and none of them match year 2008. It fails WP:GNG and is WP:SPIP. It was deleted as a WP:PROD yet reverted for no reason. Page should therefore...
Click to read more »coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, WP:SPIP and / or insufficient i.e. this apparent interview with the CEO WSJ. Created...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found. What comes are is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/YA4NCY with few other contributions outside...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Francescatuckett with few other contributions...
Click to read more »details. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Delete - per WP:SPIP. I enjoyed the contact details as well. MisterRichValentine (talk) 16:11...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/CrisCris84 with with a history of what...
Click to read more »09:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG, also fails WP:SPIP. Article reads like a company brochure. Wikipedia is not a marketing platform...
Click to read more »article is cited to routine corporate news, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP sources, such as [1] (forbes.com/sites/) which is a user-submitted area....
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) this person lacks notability (WP:SPIP). The article is also an orphan. GillsMan (talk) 13:13, 24 October 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found, what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. References in the article are self-published, promotional, or unselective...
Click to read more »Corporate spam, zero indications of notability. Topic fails GNG. Fails WP:SPIP. Not one of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability...
Click to read more »release/promotional based and thus excluded as counting towards notability per WP:SPIP. Unlike most of these type of AfD nominations, I actually think the subject...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is largely about the company, WP:SPIP or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is routine notices, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP. Created by Special:Contributions/Mdomengeaux with...
Click to read more »samee converse 10:54, 8 May 2018 (UTC) Delete Utter corporate spam, fails WP:SPIP. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or a directory. Zero indications...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or not independent of the company. Not notable as a podcaster either. Created...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Zero indications of notabilty, totally promotional, fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. On a related note, I've also nominated the founder João...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Delete as above, fails WP:NCORP and GNG, promotional fails WP:SPIP. HighKing++ 18:39, 2 March 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »coverage not found. Article is cited to passing mentions, routine news, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created by an account...
Click to read more »meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Micamer and extensively edited by...
Click to read more »not found; what comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Has raised $4M in funding, which is low. Created by Special:Contributions/JDob4...
Click to read more »(spin me / revolutions) 14:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, reference fails WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 15:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:NAUTHOR. Coverage is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. In general, promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »has been a subject of persistent promotional editing and is based on WP:SPIP sourcing. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »14:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG, entirely promotional fails WP:SPIP, references fail the criteria for establishing notability and fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »speedy: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC) Delete. Fails...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC) Delete Entirely promotional, fails WP:SPIP. I cannot locate any sources that meet the criteria for notability, fails...
Click to read more »advertorially tone page for an unremarkable app; sourcing is trivial mentions, WP:SPIP and / or blogs. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. What comes are is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP, such as executive interviews. Created by Special:Contributions/Italitok...
Click to read more »Happy New Year 21:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC) Delete Corporate spam, fails WP:SPIP. I'd also say that the Winipeg Free Press does not meet the definition for...
Click to read more »December 2017 (UTC) Delete -- advertorial page on a nn pageant. Sourcing is WP:SPIP / passing mentions as would be expected in these typs of promo articles....
Click to read more »lists, or is recycled press that doesn't count towards notability under WP:SPIP. One a WP:BEFORE search, I could find no additional sourcing that would bring...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; sources are in passing and / or WP:SPIP. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:29, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom Devokewater...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is mostly passing mentions and WP:SPIP sources; samples: The Evolving YouTube Economy: Why AdRev Acquired DashGo...
Click to read more »delete as A7 / G11. Promotional 'cruft on a nn individual, based off WP:SPIP sourcing. I requested such, let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:12...
Click to read more »found -- what comes up is passing mentions, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »leader with expertise across varied industries ..."! Etc. Sourcing is WP:SPIP and / or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »serve to establish notability for Wikipedia's purposes. Furthermore, per: WP:SPIP: The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP, such this interview [1] or commentary by the subject in the media: [2]....
Click to read more »thing since then has been a benchmark test (which IMHO likely fails the WP:SPIP test and so isn't usable for notability purposes) shows PearC fails the WP:SBST...
Click to read more »been indef'd. scope_creepTalk 10:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic...
Click to read more »Criteria WP:BIO or WP:BLP given WP:WHYN and WP:N (and some instances of WP:SPIP) Steuben (talk) 15:41, 29 November 2012 (UTC) KEEP to summarize the statements...
Click to read more »coverage and what references they're are, are self-published or fail WP:SPIP. scope_creepTalk 20:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - zero evidence of...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »coverage not found. Article is cited to passing mentions, interviews, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. The section on...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Intelsohail...
Click to read more »spam on a completely nn company. Sourcing is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP; fluff copy includes: Neurotic Media uses a patented B2B2C business relationship[7]...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable telehealth startup. Sourcing is pretty clearly WP:SPIP or press release churn/primary sourcing which makes it excluded by WP:ORGIND...
Click to read more »'cruft based on WP:SPIP sourcing. Just a private company going about its business. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:53, 30 June 2018 (UTC) SPIP sourcing, are you...
Click to read more »appears to be an autobiography of a non-notable teenage animator (WP:GNG/WP:SPIP). It also lacks reliable sources (WP:RS), most of the references appear to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not an advertising platform. Article is promotional and fails WP:SPIP. Also fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 18:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »coverage not found. Article is cited to passing mentions, routine news, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. The company has...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. Article cited to passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP, or routine funding news. Created by Special:Contributions/JonathanBentz...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is routine notices, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Lidarosehasbrouck with few other contributions...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Coverage is mostly attempts at self-promotion such as: "Beware the botnet...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR-driven or based on WP:SPIP sources. Has raised $8M which strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.ccdh.org.ma/spip.php?article182 (R/Xmeta/L) User is in trusted groups rollbacker, reviewer...
Click to read more »sources, which do not establish notability on Wikipedia. Furthermore, per: WP:SPIP: The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP and / or not independent of the company. Created by Special:Contributions/Chrbjelland...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP. Sourcing is in passing and / ot WP:SPIP, insufficient for establishing notability. Also qualifies as WP:G11. --K...
Click to read more »advertising platform nor an alternative to a corporate website. Fails WP:SPIP. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 18:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Article created by user Mmendras and thus seems to violate WP:COI and WP:SPIP. No reliable sources. One reference cited seems to provide nominal coverage...
Click to read more »websites. Cleaned up a bit, as the article also falls (fell) foul of WP:SPIP and WP:NOTPROMOTION. Oh, and what are those refs supposed to be? CaptainScreebo...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP:ANYBIO and significant RS coverage not found. Coverage is in passing, WP:SPIP and / or not independent of his executive position. Wikipedia is not a CV...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH. Ajf773 (talk) 09:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 15:10, 22 August...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. What comes are is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:37, 30 May...
Click to read more »indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Also advertorial fails WP:SPIP. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a corporate web page, nor is it a platform...
Click to read more »notability, beyond its having a notable parent organization. WP:GNG and WP:SPIP --KRAPENHOEFFER! TALK 08:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC) I am also nominating...
Click to read more »on WP:GNG and also includes self-promotion and publicity of a company (WP:SPIP). --AmericanAgent (talk) 09:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Delete. Per norm. few...
Click to read more »organization's personnel as story sources". No WP:ORGIND sources and clear WP:SPIP. Company hasn't received enough coverage to be considered notable. Nihlus...
Click to read more »WP:NORG and significant RS coverage not found. Sourcing is hyper-local, WP:SPIP, and / or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SPIP JohnMarkOckerbloom (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC) This looks to be a...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP and WP:SPIP. Suspicious article history too. -- HighKing++ 14:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »coverage cannot be found to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources are passing mentions, WP:SPIP or routine funding news. Previously deleted via PROD. According to my PROD...
Click to read more »soft and better options don't appear to be readily available. Looking at WP:SPIP has encouraged me to say no here. Deconstructhis (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2010...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:45, 21 October...
Click to read more »musician, whose claims of notability are referenced entirely to WP:BLOGS and WP:SPIP rather than to any evidence of reliable source coverage about her in real...
Click to read more »not found. Article sources to routine finding news, passing mentions, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. The one source...
Click to read more »Abnehmen Acai Beeren Kaufen (diff - DELETED) - Link: chambon-espacesverts.com/spip.php?article1&page=forum&id_article=1&id_forum=16756&arg=2961032321&hash=...
Click to read more »article. The article is self-promotional and indiscriminate publicity per WP:SPIP. It is almost a verbatim copy of a publicity company's webpage (see http://www...
Click to read more »17:21, 15 August 2018 (UTC) Delete as per nom. In addition, appears to be WP:SPIP as the original author's account is a WP:SPA with a username that matches...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. Article sourced to passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP sources. Created by Special:Contributions/KingofEnggs currently indef blocked...
Click to read more »well and for a cultivated area with the same name. http://www.localiban.org/spip.php?article4027 seems to refer to the same place. I am inclined to think...
Click to read more »sources, which do not establish notability on Wikipedia. Furthermore, per: WP:SPIP: The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself...
Click to read more »Beyond that, no indications of this meeting WP:NCORP and sources are WP:SPIP / passing mentions. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:40, 23 November...
Click to read more »RL0919 (talk) 11:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC) Delete It is spammy, fails WP:SPIP but I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:WEB. I've located a few mentions in relations...
Click to read more »America1000 10:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Delete: sources are in passing, WP:SPIP or not independent of the subject's company. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:08, 19...
Click to read more »This is a blog. NON-RS. Fails WP:SPIP [9] An announcement. [10] Profile page on a self-hosted, a blog. Fails WP:SPIP There is a duplicate. It doesn't...
Click to read more »What comes up are mentions related to company announcements and other WP:SPIP sources. Sources used in the article are user-generated databases. Does not...
Click to read more »Sailor 00:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC) Delete Clearly advertising, fails WP:SPIP. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a corporate website. None of the references...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC) Delete: An article on a...
Click to read more »company. Lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources outside of WP:SPIP. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. Deleted through AfD earlier this year. Rentier...
Click to read more »August 2017 (UTC) Delete -- sources are blogs, trivial mentions and / or WP:SPIP, failing WP:CORPDEPTH. Just a private company going about its business, no...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP and other similar sources otherwise not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found. What comes are is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. The company is now defunct so no further prospects for enhanced notability...
Click to read more »sourcing is press releases excluded towards counting towards notability by WP:SPIP and WP:ORGIND. Other sourcing is typical industry press, which we usually...
Click to read more »company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR-driven or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. First AfD closed as "delete" in...
Click to read more »not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is in passing, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. TechCrunch is not a "major tech magazine". K.e.coffman (talk) 02:04, 14...
Click to read more »accounts. -- HighKing++ 20:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Delete Spam, fails WP:SPIP, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing++ 20:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Alexius08 (talk) 02:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC) Delete As per op, fails WP:SPIP. -- HighKing++ 19:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »What comes up is passing mentions, interviews, routine funding news, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. WP:TOOSOON per...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or routine corporate notices. The company is defunct, so no future opportunity...
Click to read more »unremarkable CEO. Coverage is in passing, relating to the company and / or WP:SPIP. Wikipedia is not a CV-hosting service. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:13, 28 December...
Click to read more »executive quotes. Article is cited to passing mentions, routine news, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created by an account...
Click to read more »meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/KingofEnggs currently indef blocked for...
Click to read more »coverage not found; what comes up is PR-driven, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by a sock (Special:Contributions/Divshirsat12). Both sock and master...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or not independent of the company. Created by Special:Contributions/Richardo42...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/MrVanDigital with few other contributions...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 08:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 14:48, 22 August...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Blatant promotionalism. Fails WP:SPIP. Has been tagged since Jan 2014 for reading like an advertisement and it...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NCORP / WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE; sourcing is routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Promo 'cruft for a nn golf course. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:42, 2 July 2018...
Click to read more »Who, me? 20:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Delete Corporate promotion fails WP:SPIP. No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 13:40,...
Click to read more »TWL) While I'm sure the game is fun this seems purely promotional as per WP:SPIP. I did a quick search of google to see if any newspapers have ran anything...
Click to read more »business. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing++ 19:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC) delete does...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP and / or not independent of the subject's company. Does not meet WP:ANYBIO...
Click to read more »itself, which per recent changes at WP:CORPDEPTH and the guideline at WP:SPIP, don't count towards notability. Everything else is non-RS blogs, publications...
Click to read more »Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Coverage is hyper-local and / or WP:SPIP. Advertorial only; no value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:27, 13...
Click to read more »coverage not found; sourcing is in passing, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Kiranhota...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:21, 22 August...
Click to read more »has been nominated for deletion for the following reasons: WP:FAILN and WP:SPIP" Thank you - I'm the IP. 2.97.116.154 (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. What comes are is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. A sales brochure / investor prospectus, with mission statements. Created...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is routine notices, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/FlorianGr with few other contributions...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not comply with GNG and SPIP. Most edits to this page appear to be from the family. Also, no new sources...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:52, 4 August...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Olurteilanru...
Click to read more »is by a SPA. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP and WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 16:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »keynote speaker, CEO and an executive coach". The sources are typical WP:SPIP, with interviews, blogs and other promotional coverage. I'll request deletion...
Click to read more »subject, poorly referenced (several citations, but no RS), borderline WP:SPIP. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC) Delete nothing in RS, all...
Click to read more »establish notability for Wikipedia's purposes. Also, importantly, per WP:SPIP: The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SPIP Flagging this page for deletion on the grounds that person is not notable...
Click to read more »it to the page of the sports team, not to create a separate become); WP:SPIP (Self-promotion) I will remind all participants that Wikipedia is not a CV...
Click to read more »serve to establish notability for Wikipedia's purposes. Furthermore, per: WP:SPIP: The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself...
Click to read more »cited to online directories, interviews, commercial websites, and other WP:SPIP sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO /...
Click to read more »RS coverage not found. What comes up is interviews, passing mentions, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Being on Shark...
Click to read more »Agree with nom, good detailed nomination, fails GNG and WP:NCORP and WP:SPIP either. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a company sales catalogue. HighKing++...
Click to read more »show something that sets apart as notable, see WP:NOTE, in this case WP:SPIP. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is routine notices, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP. Created by Special:Contributions/Ckevinliu with...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Question notability. Might violate WP:SPIP. No inline citations. Vertium (talk to me) 21:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »should make an entry for him too! Article clearly violates WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:SPIP and WP:V. Veryhuman (talk) 06:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Speedy Delte : as...
Click to read more »received a single, non-notable, local award. Most of the sources are WP:SPIP, some are unreliable and some are self-published. There is no indication...
Click to read more »does not meet WP:NCORP; coverage is in passing, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Promotionalism only. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »"chartered professional accountant". Sourcing is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Promotional article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »coverage not found; sourcing is in passing, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Lunchyet with no other contributions. Does...
Click to read more »| history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: portal.ufe.edu.eg/spip/?lang=en (R/Xmeta/L- still there) Displayed 1 additions out of 13 total....
Click to read more »WP:PROMO / WP:TOOSOON. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH; sources are routine funding news, WP:SPIP, etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »sources, which do not establish notability on Wikipedia. Furthermore, per: WP:SPIP: The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself...
Click to read more »betapolitique.fr/spip.php?article0555 (186, 48, 9, 1) www.betapolitique.fr/spip.php?action=redirect&id_breve=518 (186, 48, 9, 1) www.betapolitique.fr/spip.php?breve0643...
Click to read more »(Talk) 22:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC) Delete: sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. Fails WP:NORG. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »significant RS coverage not found. Article is cited to passing mentions, WP:SPIP and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created by a banned...
Click to read more »WP:PROMO and as WP:GNG fail. A nn software package with trivial reviews / WP:SPIP sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »is written more as a Resume/CV of the individual and a clear case of WP:SPIP and fails to establish any notability. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG Hagennos (talk)...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Issues with WP:Notability, WP:SPIP, and WP:COI. Page author has another page in AFD also for promotion of this...
Click to read more »article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »coverage not found. Article is cited to passing mentions, routine news, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created by an account...
Click to read more »not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is in passing, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »not found. Citations listed in the article consist of passing mentions, WP:SPIP, or other unsuitable sources. Likely created for compensation; pls see:...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NSOFT and WP:SPIP. No coverage in reliable sources. only the usual tech blogs, and then only...
Click to read more »the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:NCORP. Article fails WP:SPIP. Topic fails GNG. HighKing++ 14:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Accesscrawl (talk) 12:45, 16 June 2018 (UTC) Delete Agree with above, fails WP:SPIP and fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 15:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC) Keep See...
Click to read more »Potatornado (talk) 16:39, 22 December 2017 (UTC) Delete Pure spam, fails WP:SPIP, references fail the criteria for establishing notability and are not intellectually...
Click to read more »the only given source says nothing about him and there are socks. Per WP:SPIP.--Ben Ben (talk) 17:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Delete per above. Persistent...
Click to read more »Keep. -- GreenC 00:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Delete: Fails GNG, IMO; also some SPIP going on here, I think. Quis separabit? 20:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »in-depth sources for the subject. I'm only seeing PR-driven coverage in WP:SPIP sources; no achievements independent of the company. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:27...
Click to read more »discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. -- HighKing++...
Click to read more »does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and...
Click to read more »found. What comes up is passing metions, routine funding news, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/IR-Articles, part of an apparent paid editing...
Click to read more »sources does not appear to exist for this subject. Furthermore, per: WP:SPIP: The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself...
Click to read more »gcsalerno.org/. * Links added in this diff: www.gcmilano.altervista.org/spip/ (15, 3, 1, 1) www.gcroma.altervista.org/ (15, 3, 1, 1) www.giovanicomunistipavia...
Click to read more »notability under WP:ANYBIO and the coverage is either routine and expected or WP:SPIP, so doesn't count towards the GNG. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:19, 10 March 2018...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails: WP:GNG WP:PORNBIO Vanity page... WP:SPIP PeterWesco (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »meet WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 15:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:SPIP and WP:NCORP. No references meet the criteria for establishing notability...
Click to read more »is spam. References are the usual churnalism or PRIMARY sources. Fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 22:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:ORGIND...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Delete, with prejudice. Sources are passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Promotionalism only for a nn event; basically, spam, fancruft and trivia...
Click to read more »does not meet WP:NCORP; coverage is in passing, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »What comes up is passing mentions, routine funding notices and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/AaronEndre with a history of what looks...
Click to read more »