Redirect to:
page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:SEHWP:SEH WP:SPAMHOLEWP:SPAMHOLE...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Tim Song (talk) 02:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC) Spamhole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia is not a linkfarm or web directory. A WP:SPAMHOLE. MER-C 08:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »are covered in the main MySpace article. This article mainly exists as a spamhole. -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Merge to Myspace. After the...
Click to read more »thing has been done, and the reason is quite clear. This article is a spamhole: removing all the links that fail our guidelines and keeping the entries...
Click to read more »Talk:Sudoku/links to consider (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) A WP:SPAMHOLE, despite being created with good intention in 2005. Wikipedia is not an...
Click to read more »--COIBot (talk) 22:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC) Closed. Use is spammy (WP:SPAMHOLE lists containing similar items). Mostly reverted, documents that link to...
Click to read more »leftover mention, needs to be handled but that whole page (List_of_GIS_data_sources) is a SPAMHOLE. --Dirk Beetstra T C 06:55, 12 February 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] Not a plausible typo for WP:SPAMHOLE. 165.91.13.60 (talk) 22:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »most general article for its topic area. See WP:EL, WP:LINKFARM, and WP:SPAMHOLE. A better place to add procedural knowledge (how-to) about edible plants...
Click to read more »Horizon (a.k.a., "The Spamhole Essay"). If you see this tag in the links section of an article and that article is no longer a spamhole, by all means feel...
Click to read more »list, e.g.), so .. allow them all? Sure, this is only one now, but WP:SPAMHOLE is a real concern. WP:COI, at WP:COI#How_to_avoid_COI_edits: '3. Linking...
Click to read more »cars .. and all these pages can be turned into linkfarms (etc. etc.). WP:SPAMHOLE is that way. --Dirk Beetstra T C 23:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Modernists...
Click to read more »generalized single web page on the Seven Years' War in general. The WP:SPAMHOLE phenomenon is real and link clutter invites more link clutter. We could...
Click to read more »which should be part of the article as sources then that needs fixing. WP:SPAMHOLE is still a problem and good-faith link pruning is not a bad thing. If,...
Click to read more »WP:EL -- there are many others involved too. So, no, I don't see any spamholes on your list. --A. B. (talk) 14:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC) No compelling...
Click to read more »protected no matter what else is done with it - that's a big freaking spamhole we have there. Gavia immer (talk) 17:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC) make a permanently...
Click to read more »pessamistic, why should we be denied this great feature bcuz of what some spamholes might do with it, i also fail to see a problem with self promoting wikipedia...
Click to read more »approrpriate for Wikipedia. --Jayron32 01:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC) See also WP:SPAMHOLE. Adding external links temporarily to an article in development may be...
Click to read more »Facebook, Twitter, etc., and Wikipedia could turn into a social network spamhole if we try to mirror every notable person's social graph. --Teratornis (talk)...
Click to read more »everything which can be reliably sourced in footnote citations. See also WP:SPAMHOLE and WP:NOBLECAUSE. Merely accumulating large numbers of external links...
Click to read more »part of what is in a list. Anything else will immediately result in a spamhole. That should be in Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Content_policies, and that...
Click to read more »notable enough for a wiki article. Otherwise this is just yet another spamhole in violation of WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:32, 10 November...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Tim Song (talk) 02:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC) Spamhole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »neutral by including their spam. One often sees that on list-pages, WP:SPAMHOLE/WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS applies there to avoid it, but it would be a stretch...
Click to read more »are covered in the main MySpace article. This article mainly exists as a spamhole. -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Merge to Myspace. After the...
Click to read more »thing has been done, and the reason is quite clear. This article is a spamhole: removing all the links that fail our guidelines and keeping the entries...
Click to read more »notable enough for a wiki article. Otherwise this is just yet another spamhole in violation of WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:32, 10 November...
Click to read more »228.79 (talk) 01:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC) See WP:EL, WP:LINKFARM, and WP:SPAMHOLE. The purpose of the External links section is to act as a temporary holding...
Click to read more »explain your actions to the editor who added the reference. Also see WP:SPAMHOLE. Or give us a link to the questionable reference and someone on the Help...
Click to read more »what they see by adding their progressively less useful links. See WP:SPAMHOLE. It's much better to introduce sources as footnote citations, but that...
Click to read more »policies and guidelines can train other new users to do likewise. See WP:SPAMHOLE for some commentary on this process. It's hard for a new user to be aware...
Click to read more »promoted by its consumers probably is not valuable. Read WP:EL and WP:SPAMHOLE. On Wikipedia we generally don't need or want a lot of external links;...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:LISTCOMPANY, WP:CSC. I'd like to have some independent guidance on this WP:SPAMHOLE. --Dirk Beetstra T C 02:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC) I'm similarly involved...
Click to read more »but that is not what external links are for. We are not creating a WP:SPAMHOLE for butterfly-curve-drawing-software (as happens on the more common calculators...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) No, that is where the problem begins (it is a bit a spamhole problem). Algarve is 'relatively small', and there will not be too many...
Click to read more »(UTC) This article is a WP:SPAMHOLE. Can it be saved? (Shutdown time is approaching.) MER-C 13:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC) WP:SPAMHOLE is an essay, and an ill-considered...
Click to read more »http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spamhole (talk • contribs) 22:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC) This was a case of vandalism...
Click to read more »external links sometimes become superfluous, start duplicating (and WP:SPAMHOLE applies). Or it was simply missed and should not have been added in the...
Click to read more »com_as_external_link_for_language_learning, which serves as an example of WP:SPAMHOLE regarding these 'learning the languages' sites. I removed: 1) Learn Amharic...
Click to read more »was a criteria for inclusion to stop the article from turning it into a spamhole, but proto removed it. Ultra-Loser [ T ] [ C ] 11:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »them out. 'Learn x'-links. Inappropriate, promotional, and a massive WP:SPAMHOLE (starting from the very first of them). If people want to learn a language...
Click to read more »reason to add yours as well. That type of reasoning is on the way to WP:SPAMHOLE via WP:OTHERLINKS-arguments. All in all, as I see that you are not going...
Click to read more »that has major implications for other subjects where it basically opens a spamhole onother subjects. No, I have even suggested that. As long as it is not...
Click to read more »journal articles and academic conferences. Said editor often claims WP:SPAMHOLE as justification for removing any new list entries. Possibly opinions regarding...
Click to read more »the Love of Meghan - (2826) - delete - closed 04:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Spamhole - (2763) - delete - closed 02:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC) Bullshido.net (4th...
Click to read more »convinced imdb should be on every page. All of these are on their way to WP:SPAMHOLE. I'm afraid we at some time should set up a list like WP:RSP for specific...
Click to read more »2250 Alanis Morissette discography 2251 Open Data 2252 Valle Nevado 2253 Spamhole 2254 Arumaipperumal 2255 Bone Chillers 2256 John Cook School of Business...
Click to read more »was a criteria for inclusion to stop the article from turning it into a spamhole, but proto removed it. Ultra-Loser [ T ] [ C ] 11:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »