Redirect to:
Wikipedia editors. New participants are welcome; feel free to talk to us! Guide to WikiProjects Directory of WikiProjects Shortcut WP:SCOTUSWP:SCOTUS...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:SCOTUS/MWP:SCOTUS/M You don't need to be a member of this WikiProject to improve U.S. Supreme Court cases. But if you're interested in becoming...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:SCOTUS/RWP:SCOTUS/R There are a variety of resources available to members of this WikiProject! Lists – a comprehensive list of U.S. Supreme...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:SCOTUS/ACGWP:SCOTUS/ACG This is an article creation guide. You can start a new case article using the following process. Subst template Begin...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:SCOTUS/SGWP:SCOTUS/SG The following is a style guide for U.S. Supreme Court cases. It contains all the necessary information and, if followed...
Click to read more »WP:SCOTUSTODOWP:SCOTUSTODO WP:SCOTUSWORKWP:SCOTUSWORK Below is an index of SCOTUS-related reports. Interested in helping write these reports? The source code...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:SCOTUS/PWP:SCOTUS/P How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time. Kill CitationNew parameter Change citation auto-linking to no longer auto-link...
Click to read more »Template:SCOTUS 1930 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Template:SCOTUS 1932-1937 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Template:SCOTUS 1925-1930 (edit...
Click to read more »Court case-related templates. {{SCOTUS-recentcase}} {{SCOTUS-case}} {{Infobox SCOTUS case}} {{SCOTUScaselists}} {{SCOTUS-stub}} {{ussc}} {{scite}} {{WikiProject...
Click to read more »Category:Pages using infobox SCOTUS case with unknown parameters Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Template talk:Infobox SCOTUS case#Warning: Page...
Click to read more »ives/Humanities/2020 September 19 Senator voting on own confirmation to Scotus Punic Exonyms Who would be responsible to remove an unwilling Trump? (2)...
Click to read more »Charles Sanders Peirce · Critical thinking · Deductive reasoning · Duns Scotus · Fallacy · Falsifiability · Gottlob Frege · Kurt Gödel · Georg Wilhelm...
Click to read more »lamp missing as much as it probably offends the maintenance staff of the SCOTUS. The building probably doesn't have a lamp missing very often, and as such...
Click to read more »Merge/Redirect - Right now, not knowing how the SCOTUS will decide the other case, it could be possible that the SCOTUS case article may grow considerably particularly...
Click to read more »constitutional amendment for it to actually be adopted. Also, let's say that SCOTUS will use the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause to declare this US...
Click to read more »opinion every SCOTUS law clerk is notable enough to have an article. But maybe not everyone agrees with me. BTW: Each of you may check that SCOTUS law clerk...
Click to read more »those intersted in becoming SCOTUS law clerks, this article shows which circuit and district judges have sent law clerks to SCOTUS; (3) this article is a useful...
Click to read more »Ordinatio or Opus Oxoniense -> work by duns Scotus. Commentary on peter Lombard's Sentences. Studies In Logic - Charles Sanders Pierce hammered out the...
Click to read more »that are sourced to the SCOTUS instead of an appropriate scholarly source." Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC) SCOTUS is absolutely a Reliable...
Click to read more »I would consider following the style guide from WP:SCOTUS/SG - I know that this is not a SCOTUS case, but it is the highest appellate court in New York...
Click to read more »Shortcut WT:SCOTUSWT:SCOTUS To view this header, please visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases where it's transcluded....
Click to read more »code available: [1] Function overview: Create un-punctuated redirects for SCOTUS cases. Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): BOTR & VPR Edit...
Click to read more »https://github.com/mzmcbride/wikiproject-scotus Function overview: Basically a clone of the automatic updater for WP:SCOTUS handled by User:WoodwardBot that I'll...
Click to read more »consistency and precedent; secondly, the stated scope and template name (SCOTUS cases) doesn't correspond to the category name. Assuming we keep that scope...
Click to read more »September 2020 (UTC) [1] Proposal to legislatively limit SCOTUS justices to 18 years on SCOTUS. After that they go back to lower courts (so they still...
Click to read more »give you the answer in a moment) is Adam Feldman, who runs the Empirical SCOTUS blog, just based on this article, republished by SCOTUSblog. If you don't...
Click to read more »instance, SCOTUS ruling that the 5th Amendment implicitly repealed the natural-born citizen requirement for the US Presidency and/or SCOTUS ruling that...
Click to read more »flagged revisions, French library agreement, German court case . In the news: SCOTUS hopeful edited bio, criticism from article subject . WikiProject report:...
Click to read more »flagged revisions, French library agreement, German court case . In the news SCOTUS hopeful edited bio, criticism from article subject . WikiProject report...
Click to read more »US Supreme Court Human rights campaigner Press interest Runner with the SCOTUS legal decision Still missing: Brandenburg Gate TGCP (talk) 15:49, 28 June...
Click to read more »lie therein Dunc|☺ 15:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC) Sorry amendment; it's a SCOTUS case, hence notable. But the article needs to be started first. Dunc|☺ 18:12...
Click to read more »07:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC) Same church meeting minutes situation as the SCOTUS rulings, but now I'm up to 1961. In one meeting, someone proposes that the...
Click to read more »SCOTUS petitions before they become SCOTUS cases. To do so would be unsustainable and would lead to a lot of deleted articles. Of course, if SCOTUS accepts...
Click to read more »I agree these are good quality pictures. Cameras are not allowed in the SCOTUS and the 3 (I think) court drawers all require payment for their work (I...
Click to read more »and 28 U.S.C. § 1360) ✗ Not done See Wikipedia:SCOTUS#Project for more info on MOS issues for SCOTUS cases. Cases that are cited are to be cited with...
Click to read more »only concern is the large gap between the lead and the table, due to the {{SCOTUS}} nav-box on the right. I suggest something like a gallery of current members...
Click to read more »recently claimed that the tradition in the Senate since 1880 has been that a SCOTUS vacancy is not filled by a president in an election year, if the Senate...
Click to read more »she's already a public figure, a politician, and she has taken her fight to SCOTUS. She will be remembered in history books for her unlawful activism and for...
Click to read more »material that is supported by citations to primary references. While in SCOTUS articles, primary references should be used, they should be used in conjunction...
Click to read more »angle, according to Duns Scotus. He seems to have coined or redefined, at any rate, the word formalitas or formality. "Scotus defined a formality as what...
Click to read more »case heard by SCOTUS will have of course been tried before the appeals courts first, who will have explained their reasoning. And SCOTUS solicits amicus...
Click to read more »notability is not inherited. While many SCOTUS cases are notable, not all are - as you can see, not every SCOTUS caae has an article now. the only sources...
Click to read more »have a separate page to cover the SCOTUS case. This should be done by moving the existing content into the SCOTUS page case (along with appropriate attribution)...
Click to read more »these style guides for SCOTUS articles: MOS:LAW and WP:SCOTUS/SG Relevant WikiProjects include WikiProject courts and judges, WP:SCOTUS, and WP:LAW Advice...
Click to read more »period some leading Continental scholars were exponents, including Johannes Scotus Eriugena and Odo of Cluny; the most influential hermeneutic writer was the...
Click to read more »to New Chrysler". This was not a SCOTUS case, SCOTUS just issued per curiam denial, so it doesn't fall under a SCOTUS case notability aspect. Most of the...
Click to read more »Peter Abelard · Albertus Magnus · Augustine of Hippo · Roger Bacon · Duns Scotus · Galileo Galilei · Leonardo da Vinci · Niccolò Machiavelli · Maimonides ·...
Click to read more »01:32, 6 November 2005 (UTC) Delete un-encyclopedic - may rate a mention on SCOTUS article, but not its own article.--Rogerd 17:29, 31 October 2005 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Donovan · Douglas Haig, 1st Earl Haig · Douglas MacArthur · Drew Carey · Duns Scotus · Eddie Cochran · Edgar Allan Poe · Edmund Burke · Edvard Grieg · Edward...
Click to read more »discussions (where appropriate): Request at WP:AWBREQ, and discussion at WT:SCOTUS Edit period(s): One time run Estimated number of pages affected: 3,068 Exclusion...
Click to read more »Young caselaw articles should, at bare minimum, consist of case briefs. WP:SCOTUS employs the following article outline, and we should not diverge from it...
Click to read more »presidential election next month--similar to the one in 2000--could we see SCOTUS apply the principles of Bush v. Gore to an election-related case after the...
Click to read more »23:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Question SCOTUS cases are considered notable (to the extent that some argue that SCOTUS denials are also notable), so why doesn't...
Click to read more »I'm hard pressed to think of a SCOTUS case that is not notable. Kotepho 18:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Strong keep. SCOTUS cases are virtually always highly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2018 October 8 US Senate traditions regarding SCOTUS confirmation Last-minute stays of execution Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Ar...
Click to read more »Damian · David · David I of Scotland · Saint Dominic · John Donne · Duns Scotus · Dunstan · Albrecht Dürer · Edward the Confessor · Edward the Martyr ·...
Click to read more »(UTC) Template:Scotus link → Template:SCOTUS link (links to redirect • history • stats) Orphan redirect to orphan template Template:SCOTUS link that is...
Click to read more »John Dewey · Denis Diderot · Wilhelm Dilthey · Diogenes of Sinope · Duns Scotus · Umberto Eco · Jonathan Edwards (theologian) · Albert Einstein · George...
Click to read more »Athletic F.C. · Dung beetle · Dungeons & Dragons · Dunkirk evacuation · Duns Scotus · Edward Plunkett, 18th Baron of Dunsany · Kirsten Dunst · Dunstan · Don...
Click to read more »right and civil liberties from the 19-20th centuries and (2) changes in SCOTUS in the 21st century with particular attention to changes since 2016. Based...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC) Comment The SCOTUS case in question has its own article: Wilkie v. Robbins. -kyykaarme (talk)...
Click to read more »requirements. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 15:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Keep All SCOTUS cases are notable because of the coverage they have received in reliable...
Click to read more »to comment on issues for which he is an expert; 4, member of the bar of SCOTUS. Verification: 1, named author at link for law review article; 2, named...
Click to read more »students about the Supreme Court of the United States (sometimes abbreviated "SCOTUS"). Formerly sponsored by Bloomberg Law and now owned by The Dispatch, the...
Click to read more »Delete. Unless you go to jail and then get your conviction overturned by the SCOTUS, neither you nor your misdeeds are not worthy of a Wikipedia entry. --Kinu...
Click to read more »surgery after he almost died of intestinal inflammation. Were there any SCOTUS rulings on the subject in 1956, or should I take this as a reference to...
Click to read more »etc. Since all SCOTUS cases are normally notable, it is likely that an article will be written on the case. Most members of WP:SCOTUS and WP:Law will...
Click to read more »article, which includes school information. There are no other lists of SCOTUS clerks by school, not even Top 10 law schools, so notability of a list of...
Click to read more »notable. Shoplifter (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC) Snow keep; every modern SCOTUS opinion, at least, is most certainly the subject of significant coverage...
Click to read more »bring legal action). Some of the refs did support that he had petitioned SCOTUS (pointers to filings where he was counsel), but all petitions were denied...
Click to read more »Makes a lot of wp:peacock claims, but nothing particularly notable, no SCOTUS cases, etc. Seems to be a db-bio issue. Pharmboy (talk) 00:42, 31 December...
Click to read more »links to the Supreme Court which is one, possibly two, too many. (Does SCOTUS need to be linked on every blurb when the link appears at the top of the...
Click to read more »Delete Notability not demonstrated in the references - some of which (e.g. Scotus blog) do not even mention him. Large amounts of article unreferenced, and...
Click to read more »Benjamin · Henri Bergson · Rudolf Carnap · Concept · Definition · Duns Scotus · Gottlob Frege · Saul Kripke · Philosophy of language · Meaning (linguistics) ·...
Click to read more »MOS:HEAD has details. Done - I left "Opinion of the Court" as is, per WP:SCOTUS. GregJackP (talk) 17:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Maybe I am missing it, but I...
Click to read more »It sounds more like a local news kind of case than an Enron. Unless the SCOTUS sets some sort of landmark precedent from this case, which I doubt will...
Click to read more »10 April 2026 (UTC) I have made many SCOTUS articles, but I've probably also made the most actual "this SCOTUS case is not notable" decisions precisely...
Click to read more »Revolution, Iranian Senate, Wire Wager Act, Massachusetts v. Laird, some SCOTUS cases, and more subsume my contributions.-Patchouli 09:16, 19 August 2006...
Click to read more »approval/DannyS712 bot 41, which were approved to do the same for wikiproject SCOTUS and wikiproject Architecture, showing that the logic of the bot is sound...
Click to read more »05:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC) Comment & Keep I've just added an important SCOTUS case that Crane involved in. While searching, I've also found that the firm...
Click to read more »useful background for attending the Court: http://home.gwu.edu/~zwolfe/site/SCOTUS_tips.html[private link] To support WMF Legal/Policy which has taken a position...
Click to read more »discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC) Template:SCOTUS link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Orphan template...
Click to read more »approval/DannyS712 bot 42, which were approved to do the same for wikiprojects SCOTUS, Architecture, and Africa, showing that the logic of the bot is sound. We...
Click to read more »esk/Archives/Humanities/2019 September 8 Law professors who ended up on SCOTUS? What fraction of a mile is a kilometer?? Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Arch...
Click to read more »with merit enough, if the SCOTUS found that the constitution actually mandated more houses... well, of course, the SCOTUS job would be to say so, and...
Click to read more »diverse sources" is "very likely to be notable". Considering that almost all SCOTUS cases receive secondary coverage in a range of sources (newspapers to law...
Click to read more »historical instances of: Some lawsuit Alice v. Bob is (after appeals) decided by SCOTUS and becomes precedent. Later, in another lawsuit Foo v. Bar, not involving...
Click to read more »12 September 2008 (UTC) Well (says this user, about to put up a recent SCOTUS case for PR himself), I would get rid of the intellectual-property box....
Click to read more »published the Pentagon Papers, triggering significant controversy and a SCOTUS case. In what form were they published by the Times? The Pentagon Papers...
Click to read more »his conviction for membership in the CPUSA, with our article saying that SCOTUS found that the Smith Act membership clause was constitutional because it...
Click to read more »Chapin was also one of first such clerks, beginning the institution of SCOTUS clerking. —cnzx (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2017 (UTC) Keep. Notable enough...
Click to read more »logs · subpages) Unused and apparently only half-finished fork of {{infobox SCOTUS case}}. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »should precede Eurocentric developments.... there's no mention of Johannes Scotus Eriugena and his PanTheistic De Divisione Naturae, condemned by the Church...
Click to read more »located a few mentions in relations to a controversy around a potential SCOTUS pick, but that's insufficient for notability. Awards are not significant...
Click to read more »a801-11e4-913c-930f7b854cab.html https://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/scotus-decision-hobby-lobby-staff-react-108448 https://www.dailypress...
Click to read more »May 26 Infamous "Latin America" gaffe Motionless with patient lust Scotus decisions with two overturns Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2022...
Click to read more »seventeenth, fifteenth and eighteenth BRfAs, creating un-punctuated redirects for SCOTUS cases, being a replacement for HBC Archive Indexerbot, and adding |oldid=...
Click to read more »downtowns; eminent domain laws have not changed (other than the recent SCOTUS ruling, which would not affect abandoned properties anyway). Chick Bowen...
Click to read more »Domesday Book · Dong Zhuo · Dreyfus affair · Du Fu · Duchy of Prussia · Duns Scotus · Dunstan · Dutch Republic · Early Middle Ages · East Germany · East Prussia ·...
Click to read more »flagged revisions, French library agreement, German court case In the news SCOTUS hopeful edited bio, criticism from article subject WikiProject report WikiProject...
Click to read more »about the subject.BrokenSegue 01:59, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC) I've followed the SCOTUS Project's guidelines inasmuch as they are applicable in this case. There...
Click to read more »saying a discussion of the 9 members of SCOTUS and one of their decisions is not specifically about the SCOTUS. Jacona (talk) 13:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wicks (not the fictional character) Do you know of any ancient Cossa's Old SCOTUS opinions Mystery bread deliveries The Mall, London driving distance time...
Click to read more »(UTC) Tamzin/SCOTUS RfD list/1 Tamzin/SCOTUS RfD list/10 Tamzin/SCOTUS RfD list/2 Tamzin/SCOTUS RfD list/3 Tamzin/SCOTUS RfD list/4 Tamzin/SCOTUS RfD list/5...
Click to read more »to extend the franchise by statute, as 4.5 SCOTUS Justices actually did in the 1970 Oregon v. Mitchell SCOTUS case). Futurist110 (talk) 05:51, 13 August...
Click to read more »use such an Infobox, here are some that may be of use: Template:Infobox SCOTUS case Infobox for Supreme Court of the United States cases. Template:Infobox...
Click to read more »law professors ever end up on SCOTUS? FTR, I'm talking about people who were law professors before they became SCOTUS Justices. Futurist110 (talk) 15:39...
Click to read more »February 15 Citizenship or residence requirements for SCOTUS Judges Untied States' "nation building" efforts in Mexico...
Click to read more »for the future: In this month currently includes File:Sonia Sotomayor in SCOTUS robe.jpg, which is now a featured picture. You may like to add it to the...
Click to read more »up a challenge to an act of Congress beforehand for SCOTUS to be able to review it. Else, SCOTUS could strike down whatever laws it pleases at whatever...
Click to read more »within that circuit, and could become notable in the future, if relied on by SCOTUS. Bearian (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Delete. This article consists...
Click to read more »The Decameron · Deventer · Divine Comedy · Domesday Book · Du Fu · Duns Scotus · Dunstan · Eadbald of Kent · Early Middle Ages · Edgar the Peaceful · Edmund...
Click to read more »to a section on this article. He was the subject of a case tried by the SCOTUS, which might make him notable, but I don't think it's enough. – Muboshgu...
Click to read more »Clinton had committed a tort against her while still governor of Arkansas. SCOTUS ruled that a sitting President may be sued for reasons preceding his actions...
Click to read more »of goodwill Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2017 December 8 SCOTUS rulings on school desegregation, 1956 What's the largest company in Transdnistria...
Click to read more »and will also notify WP:SCOTUS and the other WikiProjects which have claimed this article about this filing (I asked at WT:SCOTUS last week if people thought...
Click to read more »sources is that the fact that SCOTUS granted the habeas petition in the case is more notable than the case itself. SCOTUS covered habeas more in-depth...
Click to read more »use such an Infobox, here are some that may be of use: Template:Infobox SCOTUS case Infobox for Supreme Court of the United States cases. Template:Infobox...
Click to read more »cited by SCOTUS? --Randykitty (talk) 21:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Montanabw and Randykitty, to clarify, this journal has not been cited by SCOTUS, but has...
Click to read more »{{PD-USGov-State}}—State Department {{PD-USGov-SI}}—Smithsonian Institution {{PD-USGov-SCOTUS}}—Supreme Court {{LOC-image}}—Library of Congress collections (NOTE: This...
Click to read more »links to the Supreme Court which is one, possibly two, too many. (Does SCOTUS need to be linked on every blurb when the link appears at the top of the...
Click to read more »(UTC) I just learnt about Principality of Monaco v. Mississippi, decided by SCOTUS in 1934. Are there any other incidents of foreign countries suing, or being...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff top?) - Link: boldtruth.com/SCOTUS-Cert-Petition-LaVergne-Bryson.pdf (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2015-05-12 03:09:59...
Click to read more »chronologically ordered, this is basically a "portion of a chronological list of SCOTUS cases." Far from an indiscriminate collection of information. · j·e·r·s·y·k·o...
Click to read more »case was before Scotland's High Court of Justiciary. The standard at WP:SCOTUS and WP:LAW is (roughly) that all cases before a nation's highest court meet...
Click to read more »articles on the tens of thousands of attorneys who have argued before the SCOTUS. Just because you have argued (or won) there does not make you notable....
Click to read more »discussion, "it's not clear under present Wikipedia notability policy that SCOTUS clerks are notable." Under Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Politicians...
Click to read more »page is part of the complete list of cases, and there are thousands of SCOTUS case articles that that list links to. Also, you may have noticed that Dreadstar...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff top?) - Link: boldtruth.com/SCOTUS-Cert-Petition-LaVergne-Bryson.pdf (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2015-05-12 03:09:59...
Click to read more »useful background for attending the Court: http://home.gwu.edu/~zwolfe/site/SCOTUS_tips.html To learn about how the U.S. legal system is handling patents on...
Click to read more »This report is automatically generated with a script (examining {{Infobox SCOTUS case}}'s "USVol" and "USPage" template parameters) and the data has not...
Click to read more »Senate majority in November, a bill to increase the number of justices in SCOTUS from 9 to 11 will definitely pass. In that situation, is it possible for...
Click to read more »a handful are SCOTUS decisions, and a cursory glance is as follows: United States v. Lara, Menominee Tribe v. United States, - SCOTUS decisions, appears...
Click to read more »notable lawyers. Well-known expert on class action lawsuits, law clerk for SCOTUS, etc. Bearian (talk) 16:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »template name could be: SCOTUS-new-case (again, "new" might also be a misnomer) SCOTUS-empty-case SCOTUS-create-case SCOTUS-blank-case You get the idea...
Click to read more »court case modified slightly for SCOTUS cases. I presume creator wasn't aware at the time that Template:Infobox SCOTUS case exists. Proposing to redirect...
Click to read more »use such an Infobox, here are some that may be of use: Template:Infobox SCOTUS case Infobox for Supreme Court of the United States cases. Template:Infobox...
Click to read more »more notable than others, for example Kelo v. New London, which led to the SCOTUS ruling that opened the way for the attempt to build a museum over Justice...
Click to read more »involvement in a SCOTUS case (such as Dred Scott), this category does not target them. Instead, the group of all litigants to all SCOTUS cases would include...
Click to read more »associated with the SCOTUS case. For example, if you do a JSTOR search for "Citizens United," almost every hit refers to the SCOTUS case. Your Google settings...
Click to read more »Writers Lifetime Achievement Award, usually the other winners are like SCOTUS justices. Andre🚐 02:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC) The book may indeed warrant...
Click to read more »Dogma · Doping (sport) · Dualism · Dualism (philosophy of mind) · Duns Scotus · Eastern philosophy · Umberto Eco · Jonathan Edwards (theologian) · Albert...
Click to read more »Zeibgeist (talk) 04:26, 3 November 2025 (UTC) Delete - while a party in a SCOTUS case can be notable for that reason, it's not automatically true, and, in...
Click to read more »7,000 blogs devoted to the legal world. Among the best, he said, is the SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) blog. "'It's run by lawyers and they...
Click to read more »use such an Infobox, here are some that may be of use: Template:Infobox SCOTUS case Infobox for Supreme Court of the United States cases. Template:Infobox...
Click to read more »because none of the articles are actually about his opinions—they are about SCOTUS decisions in which he happened to submit an opinion (and he rarely even...
Click to read more »Eritrea · Eritrean War of Independence · Eritrean–Ethiopian War · Johannes Scotus Eriugena · Erlang (programming language) · Erlangen · R. Lee Ermey · Ernest...
Click to read more »corporate clients against their employees), "service as a law clerk at SCOTUS or having clerked for another famous judge". I note that bar journals tend...
Click to read more »faith. Since you're concerned about the multitudes of poor articles on SCOTUS cases, perhaps you would care to review the cases listed in United States...
Click to read more »has two factors of my standards, which is not enough. He has clerked for SCOTUS and is tenured, but hasn't done anything else notable, from what's in the...
Click to read more »fourth source is a blog. One of the sources here that seems credible (the SCOTUS blog) does not mention "Free Speech For People" at all. Source 6: Democracy...
Click to read more »Seven of the nine citations are to the decisions of the 9th Circuit and SCOTUS. Of the two remaining, one is a Harvard Law Review comment, the other a...
Click to read more »lunatic asylum Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2016 October 29 SCOTUS vacancy Is Grumpy Cat really the world's most valuable animal? Children...
Click to read more »in the USA, decisions are binding from the top down in a couple of ways: SCOTUS is supreme everywhere and binds on all lower courts, including Circuits...
Click to read more »period ends on 25 Jun 2013 at 15:27:07 (UTC) Reason I was looking around the SCOTUS blog, out off curiosity about the major cases coming up - for those that...
Click to read more »Terrier · Scottish clan · Scottish independence · Scottsdale, Arizona · Duns Scotus · Scout (Scout Movement) · The Scout Association of Hong Kong · Scout Association...
Click to read more »Eritrea · Eritrean-Ethiopian War · Eritrean War of Independence · Johannes Scotus Eriugena · Tage Erlander · Erlangen · Ernst & Young · Eros (mythology) ·...
Click to read more »HrafnTalkStalk(P) 04:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Delete -- It's terribly obsolete. SCOTUS decided long ago that they're not POWs. Most of this is already in unlawful...
Click to read more »But if you read section (c) of paragraph 1 in the holdings of the actual SCOTUS opinion ([1]), you'll notice that while the Supreme Court states several...
Click to read more »17:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Strong keep. Even absent the media coverage, any SCOTUS action that comes with an issued opinion of some length, even a unanimous...
Click to read more »John Dewey · Denis Diderot · Wilhelm Dilthey · Diogenes of Sinope · Duns Scotus · Umberto Eco · Jonathan Edwards (theologian) · Albert Einstein · George...
Click to read more »Crockett · Donald Trump · Douglas Haig, 1st Earl Haig · Douglas MacArthur · Duns Scotus · Edinburgh · Edward II of England · Edward I of England · Edward VIII of...
Click to read more »the SCOTUS justices are treated is up to any hosting organization or similar. The US is somewhat peculiar in that many citizens can name all SCOTUS members...
Click to read more »kidnapped by a CIA snatch team, and sent to Guantanamo. In 2004, when the SCOTUS forced the DoD to inform the captives of the evidence against them, Belkacem's...
Click to read more »state and federal litigation, including a challenge of the validity at SCOTUS. Aboutmovies (talk) 23:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC) Comment/question: Anyone...
Click to read more »subpages) Template now superseded by a newer template Template:SCOTUS Justices listing all SCOTUS Justices; redundant implementation on Chief Justice pages...
Click to read more »21:00, 31 October 2005 (UTC) Comment—Regarding "merging," I like the new SCOTUS demographics article, but I don't think this should exist as a redirect...
Click to read more »Arguments subsection needs to be moved into the Background section, see WP:SCOTUS/SG. OK, I think I changed this after someone gave me some feedback that...
Click to read more »but they don't seem to relate to this article. The voluntarianism of Duns Scotus for example is described as the view that the divine will took precedence...
Click to read more »reasonably expect to exist in the near future - continuing expansion of SCOTUS coverage will hit 'em eventually. Nonetheless, seems odd to have any redlinks...
Click to read more »presidents -> Dr. Howard W. Creecy, Jr. 1 Template:SCOTUS-justice-listentry -> Smith v. Smith 1 Template:SCOTUS-termlist-entry -> Faith v. Reason 1 Template:SCOTUSCases...
Click to read more »use such an Infobox, here are some that may be of use: Template:Infobox SCOTUS case Infobox for Supreme Court of the United States cases. Template:Infobox...
Click to read more »Divine grace · Dome · Saint Dominic · Dominican Order · John Donne · Duns Scotus · Dunstan · Albrecht Dürer · Durham Cathedral · Dutch Reformed Church ·...
Click to read more »when you're producing stubs about topics that definitely deserve articles. SCOTUS decisions definitely deserve articles, so don't wonder on that count. Nyttend...
Click to read more »whether lord philips sat in that case. The new SCOTUK is different from say SCOTUS in that usually only a subset of its judges sit on each case. Therefore...
Click to read more »{{SCOTUS-stub}} {{SCOTUS-Chase-stub}}, {{SCOTUS-Ellsworth-stub}}, {{SCOTUS-Hughes-stub}}, {{SCOTUS-Jay-stub}}, {{SCOTUS-Marshall-stub}}, {{SCOTUS-Rutledge-stub}}...
Click to read more »(cleric) YNWilliam Bell Scott Joshua Scottow YDuns Scotus John Scotus Macarius Scotus Marianus Scotus Henry Scougal John Scougal Patrick Scougal John Scouler...
Click to read more »05:44, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) There is a Wikiproject on this very issue: see WP:SCOTUS. Also, this is a reasonably standard structural division for U.S. Supreme...
Click to read more »letter of WP:POLITICIAN says, that as a "last appellate court", e.g., the SCOTUS of this particular system of law, that the representatives are inherently...
Click to read more »arguments to keep seem to relate to a supposed defiance of a SCOTUS ruling on Shelby Park. SCOTUS has not ruled on Shelby Park. It has ruled on an emergency...
Click to read more »citations, that were reported in a particular source. And for the modern SCOTUS era at least, we will eventually have articles on each of these opinions...
Click to read more »the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:30, 28 August 2025 (UTC) Template:SCOTUS URL CaseFinder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) No transclusions...
Click to read more »SCOTUS precedents since there would have been no majority SCOTUS opinion (which I believe is required in order to create a new legally binding SCOTUS...
Click to read more »with Defining Post-Truth Politics Copyright renewals Writings of current Scotus justices on Secession Transcendental Painting Group Information...
Click to read more »his native place; studied philosophy and Oriental philology... John Duns Scotus (JE | WP GWP G) Franciscan monk, theologian, and scholiast; born at Dunston...
Click to read more »13:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC) Thank you for finding that review of the Duns Scotus book in The Anglican Review'. One of my hesitations has been that he published...
Click to read more »(UTC) I have completed a starter article on Snyder v. Phelps, the recent SCOTUS case involving Westboro Baptist Church. I was surprised to find that it...
Click to read more »because they are in the news whenever some famous alumnus is appointed to SCOTUS or wins an Oscar? Initially, it appears that one can make a good argument...
Click to read more »in the area of selecting judges, especially for the Supreme Court. If a SCOTUS judge dies or retires, Biden would have an easier time getting his candidate...
Click to read more »important, it's more of an extension of an earlier SCOTUS case. It even has a section on that other SCOTUS case's article page. Still, I was going by the...
Click to read more »individual votes in AfDs, however, this one is particularly uninformed. Read SCOTUS and then tell me that what nine people decide for a nation of 300 million...
Click to read more »Cheng Hao Cheng Yi (philosopher) Hasdai Crescas Duns Scotus (Level 4) Francesc Eiximenis John Scotus Eriugena Al-Farabi (Level 4) Robert Grosseteste Heloise...
Click to read more »--Lambiam 12:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC) The just-published NYSRPA v. Bruen scotus decision chose a "text and history" standard for interpreting the 2nd amendment...
Click to read more »but just a hired civil servant, at least until the recent decision by SCOTUS. Well, perhaps Donald Trump will be known as such. If so, he will have to...
Click to read more »e-future-of-online-public-history/ Emily - Generation Wikipedia! Bill - SCOTUS cites Wikipedia regarding a well-known shock site: https://twitter...
Click to read more »but maybe rename? What if the article was "Lago Agrio litigation" (per SCOTUS)? We could then merge that whole section which now dominates the Lago Agrio...
Click to read more »members, and it's encyclopedic value rests in the life appointment nature of SCOTUS--i.e., there is always discussion about whether a nominee is too young or...
Click to read more »speedy deleted per WP:G7. -- Tavix (talk) 21:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC) File:SCOTUS oral arguments oral arguments.mp3 → commons:Category:Recordings of United...
Click to read more »vote as pledged. I would have thought that would be unconstitutional but SCOTUS disagreed. There's probably more information at faithless elector. --Trovatore...
Click to read more »November 2005 (UTC) Keep. Seriously. Reyk 10:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC) Keep. SCOTUS cases are national news in the US when they're in progress, often have prominent...
Click to read more »because it's not clear under present Wikipedia notability policy that SCOTUS clerks are notable. Even if we did add the list of names to the article...
Click to read more »approval/DannyS712 bot 35, which was approved to do the same for wikiproject SCOTUS for ~150 pages, showing that the logic of the bot is sound. Approved for...
Click to read more »use such an Infobox, here are some that may be of use: Template:Infobox SCOTUS case Infobox for Supreme Court of the United States cases. Template:Infobox...
Click to read more »only concern is the large gap between the lead and the table, due to the {{SCOTUS}} nav-box on the right. I suggest something like a gallery of current members...
Click to read more »regulations (Rule 4.2). WP:SCOTUS articles generally follow WP:MOSLAW#Citations and referencing, and the Bluebook is the style used at SCOTUS. See also WP:CITE#Citation...
Click to read more »former (age at appointment) has everything to do with their role on the SCOTUS. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 03:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC) I answered the question...
Click to read more »have taken to treating RfA with all the seriousness and showmanship of the SCOTUS confirmation hearings—except that the Wikipedia version is all in written...
Click to read more »passes my standards for notability for lawyers and/or professors: he was a SCOTUS law clerk, and he wrote a leading text on conflict of laws. Book reviews...
Click to read more »for lawyers and per David Eppstein. He was Inn of Court and clerked for SCOTUS, amongst other activities. Note that the Federalist Society is not a bar...
Click to read more »article, is stable, and is written in accordance with WP:MOSLAW and WP:SCOTUS criteria, especially in regards to the Bluebook reference style (which is...
Click to read more »"it". A sentence at the end of the section saying that the LSC appealed to SCOTUS would be useful, to segue into the next section. Why is the LSC the Applicant...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Delete with no prejudice to future creation as a real article. SCOTUS cases are inherently notable. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:30, 14 May 2008...
Click to read more »Keep. On Google Scholar he has a number of highly cited papers, and his Scotus is 12K cites and h-index of 58, so this looks like a pass of WP:NPROF#C1...
Click to read more »Nutshell for guidance on the major cases, given that there are hundreds of SCOTUS opinions in this area. I also hope to reduce direct citations to cases themselves...
Click to read more »too much to be a reviewer, but will note that this is the first time that SCOTUS has addressed ICWA since Holyfield that alone is significant! Montanabw(talk)...
Click to read more »I would support this for this date, as relevant (the date argued before SCOTUS), and per Cirt-informative and illuminating on a topic of American constitutional...
Click to read more »Parris Island, when a recruit died the case was under consideration by the SCOTUS [2] Mario Madera-Rodriguez charged with killing Green Beret Logan Melgar...
Click to read more »is married to does not confer notability, and in itself clerking for a SCOTUS justice does not make them notable either (although people who do very often...
Click to read more »Ivanvector (talk) 15:14, 26 June 2015 (UTC) Delete SCOTUS-care v SCOTUS-scare; scare from/of/by SCOTUS also sometimes uses this spelling -- 70.51.203.69...
Click to read more »Per MOS:INSTITUTION, "court" should not be capitalized when referring to SCOTUS as just that. Because the Naturalization Act was meant to help courts address...
Click to read more »is the best to live in? Chinese Geneaology Famous Santorini (?) painting SCOTUS rulings. Life Insurance claims India Legality of Prescription medicine purchases...
Click to read more »think the overall structure of both is consistent with that advocated by WP:SCOTUS. Savidan 16:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC) The first sentence strikes me as somewhat...
Click to read more »Supreme Court cases is to give the context that she wanted to overturn a SCOTUS ruling rather than change existing state law. Jon698 (talk) 13:07, 7 June...
Click to read more »–Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC) Keep - since the SCOTUS case, he's become notable as an activist. Plenty of sources are available...
Click to read more »cases of the Jay Court stubs {{SCOTUS-Jay-stub}} United States Supreme Court cases of the Rutledge Court stubs {{SCOTUS-Rutledge-stub}} United States Supreme...
Click to read more »headlines as an education board member well before he was appointed to SCOTUS. This is not the situation for this subject. Bearian (talk) 19:47, 29 April...
Click to read more »basically how this question about standing got to SCOTUS at all. Is it not a "law 101" question rather than a SCOTUS question? Are there analogous cases? E.g....
Click to read more »April 27 origin of St. Peter at the pearly gates vietnam war SCOTUS opinions by justice Burke and Romanticism The four basic/fundamental types...
Click to read more »overkill for Wikipedia's coverage of a case that didn't even get heard at SCOTUS. This is very much failing WP:NOT#NEWS at this point. --Masem (t) 01:30...
Click to read more »(if not thousands) of lawyers admitted to state supreme courts as well as SCOTUS, that in and of itself does not establish notability. Certainly having litigated...
Click to read more »removing most (but not all) of the bloat I see no real evidence of notability. Scotus h-factor is 29 with ~4k cites, too low for WP:NPROF. I am not convinced...
Click to read more »motivation with the article was that I'd keep opening up wikipedia pages about SCOTUS decisions, and one of the sentences in the lead section would say something...
Click to read more »there are 4 courts here: lower court; state supreme; court of claims, and SCOTUS. Always use a modifier to tell the reader which court. Done GregJackP Boomer...
Click to read more »Middle Ages (Sep 2009) «FA, Top» David II of Scotland (Oct 2009) «High» Duns Scotus (Oct 2009) «High» Robert I of Scotland (Oct 2009) «Top» William Wallace...
Click to read more »(music) renamed to Interpolation (disambiguation). Johannes Scotus Eriugena renamed to John Scotus Eriugena. Leading-tone seventh chord renamed to Leading-tone...
Click to read more »unusual for Duns Scotus to use ordinatio as simply "ordination" since that is the more likely medieval usage, but I guess Duns Scotus was a better Latinist...
Click to read more »of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:56, 17 May 2025 (UTC) Template:SCOTUS-recentcase-outline-1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)...
Click to read more »opening remarks that the prose is excessive, especially in block quotes to SCOTUS cases. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 04:07, 2 April 2025 (UTC) Overhauled the Citizenship...
Click to read more »United States case law Nominator's rationale: Upmerge, OCAT. Dividing the SCOTUS cases by year in this manner is a great detriment to navigation. It is necessary...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Old SCOTUS cases aren't always notable, and this one in particular seems to have a...
Click to read more »WikiProject SCOTUS has been trying to get the headers of articles more standardized (and the leads). There's info about this at WP:SCOTUS. It'd be nice...
Click to read more »that it is only required when copying intellectual content. As per the SCOTUS ruling in Feith v. Rural, the contents of {{cite}} templates, {{infobox}}en...
Click to read more »select who to endorse in elections. --Jayron32 12:33, 17 May 2019 (UTC) SCOTUS said differently in Smith v. Allwright... AnonMoos (talk) 16:38, 17 May...
Click to read more »discussion, "it's not clear under present Wikipedia notability policy that SCOTUS clerks are notable." Under Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Politicians...
Click to read more »v. Texas). Trebor 13:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC) I added a picture of the SCOTUS at the time of the case, and a timeline of prior events. There's also PD...
Click to read more »Supreme Court case infoboxes and made a nice impact in improving WikiProject:SCOTUS. I'm currently in the process of converting the old Elementbox system into...
Click to read more »the EU. Edison (talk) 01:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC) Edison, the point of SCOTUS was (1) the Articles prohibited secession, (2) the Constitution was supposed...
Click to read more »majority. Will look into it, using sources above. Precedent? - What later SCOTUS cases, if any, relied on this case? None that I have found. Map? - Since...
Click to read more »practice of blaming evidence of wrongdoing on spouses. While the most recent SCOTUS controversy of Clarence Thomas' nondisclosure of finances is located within...
Click to read more »on government website entries in Wikipedia. Every SCOTUS case is directly piped in from the SCOTUS website, the same for townships from the census data...
Click to read more »edit the article to include more of the SCOTUS nominee's response, which is linked to. The Dean is NOT a SCOTUS nominee (even if she was, it would make...
Click to read more »launch 2 STS120LaunchHiRes-edit1 Seattle I-5 skyline dllu Sonia Sotomayor in SCOTUS robe Space Shuttle Atlantis launches from KSC on STS-132 side view Space...
Click to read more »case with its own article in Wikipedia; arguing more than one case before SCOTUS; service to major committees. Llmeyers (talk) 13:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Insurance Law Ruled 'Constitutional'", (where the company challenged a SCOTUS ruling) "Insurers Ranked by Complaints" "Country-Wide Under Fire From State...
Click to read more »would be interested in massively improving the Duns Scotus article for the contest. Duns Scotus is one of the top three medieval Philosophers, along...
Click to read more »WP:CITE and WP:V I assume you're referring to the findlaw links ... at WP:SCOTUS we've been doing it that way for a while. I suppose I could convert them...
Click to read more »{{PD-USGov-State}}—State Department {{PD-USGov-SI}}—Smithsonian Institution {{PD-USGov-SCOTUS}}—Supreme Court {{LOC-image}}—Library of Congress collections (NOTE: This...
Click to read more »United States case law Nominator's rationale: Upmerge, OCAT. Dividing the SCOTUS cases by year in this manner is a great detriment to navigation. It is necessary...
Click to read more »org/content/brown/LizzBrownShow-(28-06-2007).mp3 blog.thehill.com/2007/06/27/scotus-ruling-in-. 2007-09-04 03:52:56: User en:Brianga (talk - contribs) to en:Italia...
Click to read more »could take advantage of which it didn't. Still, more of those redlinked SCOTUS decisions (particularly Torcaso, which I can't believe we don't have) should...
Click to read more »made waves for his "gay parenting" study and the related marriage equality SCOTUS ruling). EvergreenFir (talk) 21:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Delete The attention...
Click to read more »scholarly articles that reference this law mention how frequently it leads to SCOTUS challenges. For example, the Washington Post (Johnson v. United States is...
Click to read more »significant coverage for only for one thing, being mentioned as a possible SCOTUS appointee) with no prejudice against future recreation if she's actually...
Click to read more »(singer) · Jim Morrison · Jim Thorpe · JoJo (singer) · Joe Montana · Johannes Scotus Eriugena · John Bodkin Adams · John C. Calhoun · John Elway · John F. Kennedy ·...
Click to read more »new source which makes passing reference to the subject's views on the SCOTUS leak. According to WP:NBASIC, while multiple reliable sources offering significant...
Click to read more »SCOTUS only has discretion on appellate cases. In a case where someone files suit against the federal government, or one state sues another, SCOTUS must...
Click to read more »Or perhaps we should wait a day or two before adding information about a SCOTUS nomination to the nominee's article? Both would be considered utterly daft...
Click to read more »the judicial branch, and it went to the US Supreme Court. Unbelievably, SCOTUS ruled that the law was constitutional and let it stand. The issue in the...
Click to read more »expounds upon Weinstock's "custom-designed" Lego "mini-figures" of female SCOTUS justices Quis separabit? 23:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC) I'm just pointing out...
Click to read more »discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:43, 5 October 2025 (UTC) Template:PD-USGov-SCOTUS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) No transclusions. Created...
Click to read more »in the state supreme court? The date at least should be mentioned if so. SCOTUS "Seven entities filed amici curiae briefs with the Supreme Court in support...
Click to read more »time of nomination, all included in category to be merged were clerks at SCOTUS. Notified creator with {{subst:cfd-notify}}Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:09...
Click to read more »December 2008 (UTC) Keep - This has to be a notable legal case, whether the SCOTUS hands down judgments or not. The question of whether Obama is legally qualified...
Click to read more »count: 283) Template:Infobox SCC (Transclusion count: 403) Template:Infobox SCOTUS Appointments (Transclusion count: 4) Template:Infobox software licence (Transclusion...
Click to read more »ambiguity as to whether the 1957 refers to the convictions being quashed or the SCOTUS ruling. I'd consider moving "in 1957" to after the first overturned. Also...
Click to read more »Links: www.nbc11.com/news/5193063/detail.html www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/10/02/scotus.allred.ap/index.html www.dnalabsinternational.com/email_newsletter/vol_...
Click to read more »Constitution, it doesn't seem to put any citizenship or residency requirements for SCOTUS judge eligibility. Can a non-US citizen, or even a non-US resident technically...
Click to read more »Thanks Chris. Pinetalk 04:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Promoted File:Sonia Sotomayor in SCOTUS robe.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 22:54, 21 August 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »01:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC) Regarding consistency between articles, we have WP:SCOTUS/SG, but it needs additional feedback and discussion. I'm not sure I buy...
Click to read more »articles. Al-Kindi Al-Farabi Peter Abelard Averroes Zhu Xi Thomas Aquinas Duns Scotus William of Ockham This section contains 14 articles. Erasmus Wang Yangming...
Click to read more »Joe_Morrison Joel_Elias_Spingarn Joel_Siegel Johann_Heinrich_Lambert Johannes_Scotus_Eriugena John_Adams_Dix John_Amos John_Biddle_(Unitarian) John_Boehner...
Click to read more »stricter standard of notability: the birth certificate thing was debunked, SCOTUS declined to hear any of the cases, and not one Representative objected to...
Click to read more »to the Container Garden page Trouble finding confirmation totals of past SCOTUS justicies edit warring Valid source or not? Changing the Title of a page...
Click to read more »whether it's a real term, making a joke about the acronym (along the lines of SCOTUS, etc.) or seem to have been mislead by Wikipedia into thinking this term...
Click to read more »com. Retrieved 11 February 2017. Kristen Walker Hatten (27 June 2016). "SCOTUS abortion decision is misogyny in action". Dallas Morning News. Retrieved...
Click to read more »information. I'm a strong supporter of the U.S. Supreme Court case lists because SCOTUS opinions are necessarily notable, being the final word on important issues...
Click to read more »although I have to point out that SCOTUS's procedures are completely irrelevant to Wikipedia's procedures :) SCOTUS precedent is considered binding, lower...
Click to read more »I agree these are good quality pictures. Cameras are not allowed in the SCOTUS and the 3 (I think) court drawers all require payment for their work (I...
Click to read more »That was determined to be copyrightable by US Federal District Court. SCOTUS found that Google met the fair-use standard for using the API though......
Click to read more »for attorneys: named professor at a major law school and a clerkship at SCOTUS. Bearian (talk) 07:14, 1 December 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »legal till Spring 1989: Board of Estimate of City of New York v. Morris. SCOTUS knocked that shit down. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 03:09, 22 December...
Click to read more »reading of the first few paragraphs makes it clear. Kinda like porn and the SCOTUS, you know it when you see it. Jo7hs2 (talk) 15:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »encyclopedic information about an organzation that filed amicus curiae briefs with SCOTUS and advertised for the first time about sexuality issues in the Deep South...
Click to read more »link up one sentence to the first instance. Done with the exception of SCOTUS link - already linked in first sentence. GregJackP Boomer! 15:04, 28 September...
Click to read more »Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy both agree that Scotus is up there with Aquinas and Ockham as the three most important philosophers...
Click to read more »be accurate. I am a member of Wikiproject SCOTUS and Wikiproject Law, and primarily write articles on SCOTUS cases (although not in Constitutional criminal...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) I should clarify, by "unsettled", I mean that as far as I know SCOTUS hasn't ruled on the question. Also as far as I know the lower federal courts...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Comment I think it's supposed to be an acronym like POTUS and SCOTUS. I've never seen it spelled this way, I usually just see "U.S. House," but...
Click to read more »selectively deleted. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Scotus Academy (history · last edit) from http://www.scotusacademy.net/History...
Click to read more »Marvellous Spider-Man 17:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC) Comment: Every other sitting SCOTUS justice has this table, and the format was modeled off of Antonin Scalia's...
Click to read more »it's factually inaccurate (for example, Wendt and Ratzenberger didn't ask SCOTUS to hear the case, since they'd won the immediately prior lower court decision);...
Click to read more »also one of those only-in-Wikipedia connections between an Olympian and a SCOTUS case. Bearian (talk) 23:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS...
Click to read more »use such an Infobox, here are some that may be of use: Template:Infobox SCOTUS case Infobox for Supreme Court of the United States cases. Template:Infobox...
Click to read more »than the SCOTUS. But where did you get the idea that WP:Notability (people)#Politicians aka WP:POLITICIAN only applies to members of the SCOTUS? I think...
Click to read more »Revolution, Iranian Senate, Wire Wager Act, Massachusetts v. Laird, some SCOTUS cases, and more subsume my contributions.--Patchouli 07:29, 25 August 2006...
Click to read more »Guantanamo have been extremely complicated. Starting in late 2004, following the SCOTUS ruling, the captives' status was supposed to be formally reviewed once a...
Click to read more »reference the Stolen Valor Act, since it was substantially overruled by SCOTUS and then a new bill was passed into law with the same name. So probably...
Click to read more »the onus is on you to back it up. Check out Faretta v. California for the SCOTUS decision that held that defendants had a constitutional right to refuse...
Click to read more »{{PD-USGov-State}}—State Department {{PD-USGov-SI}}—Smithsonian Institution {{PD-USGov-SCOTUS}}—Supreme Court {{LOC-image}}—Library of Congress collections (NOTE: This...
Click to read more »phrase is a term of art in U.S. constitutional law, and means, according to SCOTUS case law, "a public official or any other person pervasively involved in...
Click to read more »article says "For example, geometric problems posed by Galileo and John Duns Scotus suggested that all infinite sets were equinumerous — see Moore 1995, p....
Click to read more »Donovan · Douglas Haig, 1st Earl Haig · Douglas MacArthur · Drew Carey · Duns Scotus · Eddie Cochran · Edgar Allan Poe · Edmund Burke · Edvard Grieg · Edward...
Click to read more »upcoming POTUS election). Question: if a sitting Senator gets nominated for SCOTUS, do they get to vote on their own confirmation? This came up on Reddit and...
Click to read more »United Kingdom." Secondly, the article seems very law-based; obviously, what SCOTUS and the other courts have said is important, but is it more than half of...
Click to read more »they are upmergd as needed to Category:American women judges and the main SCOTUS category, if not already in there. postdlf (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2012...
Click to read more »(C) James IV of Scotland (Start) Ogham (B) Berwick-upon-Tweed (C) Duns Scotus (C) John of Scotland (Start) Battle of Flodden Field (B) James III of Scotland...
Click to read more »years ago after seeing her engaging in advocacy on behalf of conservative SCOTUS nominees. I remember at the time straining to find unconnected sources....
Click to read more »moved into mainspace. — CactusWriter | needles 11:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC) Scotus Academy (history · last edit) from http://www.scotusacademy.net/History...
Click to read more »Pancuronium_bromide (diff, hist) Added links: http://web.archive.org/web/20080112055432/http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/09/25/scotus.roundup.ap/index.html#cnnSTCText...
Click to read more »coverage in The Economist on SC constitutional cases service as a law clerk at SCOTUS or having clerked for another famous judge. Clerked for Chief Justice/famous...
Click to read more »and trust lands. Jurisdiction is also not what you should base it on - SCOTUS can't even keep it straight from session to session. If one is empty, we...
Click to read more »There appears to be some research on the unanimity (or lack thereof) in SCOTUS decisions[2] but even if we were to have an article on that topic I don't...
Click to read more »19:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC) MJGTMKME123 (talk) 23:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC) SCOTUS Operandi (talk) 17:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC) IX1922 (talk) 04:26, 26 September...
Click to read more »be hard to criminally charge even Trump for inciting riot, per the 1969 SCOTUS decision Brandenburg v. Ohio. Sharron Angle ran actual campaign ads showing...
Click to read more »proposition (much like this nomination does). It's kind of like when the SCOTUS has different opinions from different circuit courts, they are more likely...
Click to read more »pure and simple. There is no need for this separate of the main list of SCOTUS nominations. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC) User:TonyBallioni...
Click to read more »categorized by every justice or judge "involved" in it, and as in many SCOTUS cases there are multiple opinions this will become unwieldy clutter of really...
Click to read more »NRDC, where the Ninth Circuit's opinion was much more important than the SCOTUS decision. Also, if you kept the District Court infobox, casual readers may...
Click to read more »SCOTUS does make the subject of the article notable. Sorry; I cannot answer where articles appear for the others banned in a similar way by theSCOTUS;...
Click to read more »to a famous court, counsel to a governor, DNC member, and argued several SCOTUS cases. As a politician, I would redirect this article as suggested. Bearian...
Click to read more »Plato Plotinus Proclus Putnam Quine Reid Russell Ryle Sartre Schopenhauer Scotus Spinoza Strawson Suárez Whitehead Wittgenstein Wolff more ... Notable works...
Click to read more »Ages – Peter Lombard*; Thomas Aquinas*; Theology – Types – Scotus and Luther – John Duns Scotus*; Martin Luther*; Theology – Types – Reformation-based –...
Click to read more »Too, I note, that your argument works both ways: there are 567 stubs of SCOTUS cases. Why focus on habeas cases that are going to be mooted by an Obama...
Click to read more »However, I find the very idea that a person very visible in a major 2018 SCOTUS decision could possibly be worthy of deletion for a Stub article! Aboudaqn...
Click to read more »done on U.S. Supreme Court case articles and happy to have nudged the WP:SCOTUS wikiproject out of hibernation (though to be honest, I think Tim4christ17's...
Click to read more »← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 12 April 2010 In the news Contribute — Share this E-mail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Reddit Digg By Chaser...
Click to read more »discussion 09 May 2025 – Template:SCOTUS-case-outline-1 TfDed by Jonesey95 was closed; discussion 09 May 2025 – Template:SCOTUS-recentcase-outline-1 TfDed by...
Click to read more »acts. So, since Newdow was heard and disposed of by SCOTUS it should be categorized at the SCOTUS level and not at the Circuit Court level. Are You The...
Click to read more »cnn.com (10.8%/19.68%/2.1% - Monitored link www.cnn.com/2006/law/10/02/scotus.allred.ap/index.html - rule: \bwoodyguthrie\.org| - reason: Automonitor:...
Click to read more »that right for one suggested appointee. Another important difference to SCOTUS is that there is mandatory retirement age of 75 years (in common with all...
Click to read more »flagged revisions, French library agreement, German court case . In the news: SCOTUS hopeful edited bio, criticism from article subject . WikiProject report:...
Click to read more »secondary sources discussing SCOTUS opinions. My point is simply that the problem here is the POV, not the reliance on published SCOTUS opinions. Cbl62 (talk)...
Click to read more »spectrum and then unleash their personal agenda once confirmed. The current SCOTUS rulings demonstrate this phenomenon. Any unelected person with extraordinary...
Click to read more »ECHR judgments. JapanOfGreenGables philosophy of law, sociology of law, SCOTUS, US Appellate Courts, rights discourse. Jarovid Jblaufeld Jc3s5h (talk)...
Click to read more »the Uyghurs, (which included the stays in Uyghur guest houses), when the SCOTUS ruled captives were, after all, entitled to challenge those allegations...
Click to read more »Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc Father Damien David I of Scotland Duns Scotus Francis of Assisi George Fox Gregory of Nazianzus Halo (religious iconography)...
Click to read more »have been a productive editor, taking a WP:SCOTUS article to FA status and generally editing in the SCOTUS/Law/Native American areas. I have worked in...
Click to read more »is a third editor, PraeceptorIP, whose work will need to be addressed if SCOTUS Monsanto cases are included (who also made one edit to the GM food article...
Click to read more »have taken to treating RfA with all the seriousness and showmanship of the SCOTUS confirmation hearings—except that the Wikipedia version is all in written...
Click to read more »(singer) · Jim Morrison · Jim Thorpe · JoJo (singer) · Joe Montana · Johannes Scotus Eriugena · John Bodkin Adams · John C. Calhoun · John Elway · John F. Kennedy ·...
Click to read more »for certiorari was Bush and respondent was Gore, therefore the case at SCOTUS was Bush v. Gore. There were likely many, many more parties and intervenors...
Click to read more »impeached because he dislikes the rulings, leading the Chief Justice of SCOTUS to rebuke Trump. The judge is currently trying to assess whether the government...
Click to read more »compelling. The fact that the religion and/or Jewishness of a member of SCOTUS is mentioned in sources is not surprising, but it also doesn't make it something...
Click to read more »père · Henry Dunant · Faye Dunaway · Isadora Duncan · Tim Duncan · Duns Scotus · Kirsten Dunst · Dunstan · Duran Duran · Albrecht Dürer · Émile Durkheim ·...
Click to read more »if you want to write about copyright, might want to use Nimmer, as even SCOTUS does. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC) "In terms of plagiarism...
Click to read more »Gbholder (talk) 11:29, 3 April 2011 (UTC) O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz - Added SCOTUS sidebar. Gbholder (talk) 12:10, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Federal Communications...
Click to read more »(UTC) Just for some context, as I see it on Google Books, Copleston says Scotus describes "creatures are to God as mensurata ad mensuram, vel excessa ad...
Click to read more »extends beyond this as well. Agradman - a law student & an interloper from WP:SCOTUS, interested in creating & organizing articles for Acts of Congress. 18:39...
Click to read more »tendency to repeat itself, it seems. In 1991, a Republican nominee for SCOTUS was embroiled in controversy during their confirmation hearing as a result...
Click to read more »she's already a public figure, a politician, and she has taken her fight to SCOTUS. She will be remembered in history books for her unlawful activism and for...
Click to read more »article about a SCOTUS case is first and foremost a legal article), all of the FAs and 2/3rds of the GAs had pictures of the SCOTUS justice who wrote...
Click to read more »Sceptre (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC) I'd like to remind Ferrylodge that SCOTUS disagrees with you about whether or not the constitution was sufficiently...
Click to read more »suggest that my scenario is, so actual case law would be unlikely. Basically, SCOTUS would need to view the second quote as manditory. Googlemeister (talk) 20:33...
Click to read more »it's just a question about workings of the law, inspired by the recent Scotus NCAA decision. If I attend a college football game (or for that matter an...
Click to read more »template for District Court cases, and a different template for other non-SCOTUS cases. I'm going to withhold a !vote for the time being, because I'd like...
Click to read more »— Hilary Putnam — Ayn Rand — John Rawls — Jean-Jacques Rousseau — Duns Scotus — Socrates — Henry David Thoreau — Ludwig Wittgenstein — Mary Wollstonecraft...
Click to read more »science courses as CONgress of the United States so it matches POTUS and SCOTUS as quick reference to all 3 branches of government here. However! You're...
Click to read more »all of the justices are mentioned by name in the article, I would use a SCOTUS image, probably in the arguments section Wehwalt seems to have some legal...
Click to read more »held a ceremony to rename the monument after the SCOTUS decision (they say encouraged by the SCOTUS decision) which was written about on Pantheos is notable...
Click to read more »essay, which it is not. The article generally follows the style guide for SCOTUS articles, with a background section, procedural history, the case opinion...
Click to read more »to "misplacing" ballots to deliberately stalling the recount to packing SCOTUS with conservatives). Sceptre (talk) 04:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC) That's...
Click to read more »the restrictions dealt with Welfare, and that one was the subject of this SCOTUS case. I think those should be in 2 separate sentences (and the "however"...
Click to read more »not, the Electoral college has bucked the popular vote before, there's a SCOTUS discussion on Obama's citizenship (laughable as that is), and we should...
Click to read more »we've all seen here, anyone who thinks that an election won without daddy's SCOTUS appointments handing it to you is more illegitimate than one with such antics...
Click to read more »(UTC) How is an NBC News story WP:PRIMARY? Something sourced directly from SCOTUS would be primary. What is this special "Trump news circus" criteria? BLP...
Click to read more »ECHR judgments. JapanOfGreenGables philosophy of law, sociology of law, SCOTUS, US Appellate Courts, rights discourse. Jarovid Jblaufeld Jc3s5h (talk)...
Click to read more »* Links added in this diff: www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/washington/19cnd-scotus.html?hp (5587, 133289, 0, 0) www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/06-694...
Click to read more »right and we need to get more of them involved in Wikiprojects Law and SCOTUS. GregJackP Boomer! 13:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC) You can always provide pushback...
Click to read more »unusual polling service and for inserting himself into the debate on the SCOTUS' decision on affirmative action. Individually they might not be enough but...
Click to read more »page is part of the complete list of cases, and there are thousands of SCOTUS case articles that that list links to. Also, you may have noticed that Dreadstar...
Click to read more »Also NFIB v. Target is in contradiction with the new Winn-Dixie case, and SCOTUS generally considers corporations to be more deserving of the proteciton...
Click to read more »in my own edit comment that the source linked to the full text of the (SCOTUS decision) case while discussing it, and said the same thing in the article...
Click to read more »union and management agreed to arbitration. ArbCom is often referred to as "SCOTUS." I am not aware of any RL arbitration method that results in sentencing...
Click to read more »Cleland YWilliam Cleland (poet) William Cleland (Commissioner) Clement Scotus I YClement of Ireland Clement of Llanthony YCaesar Clement YGregory Clement...
Click to read more »Noting from reading all the stuff I can find -- Spitzer clearly opposes the SCOTUS rulings on gun laws which used a strong NRA-supported interpretation of...
Click to read more »in multiple 3rd party sources, and being cited repeatedly (including by SCOTUS). While calls for civility are justified and appropriate, I would like to...
Click to read more »Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. Are they, in fact, SCOTUS justices, or something else? They were not supreme court justices, just...
Click to read more »Sandstein 09:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Keep I would argue that the lead of every SCOTUS case article ought to include the vote. I based the name largely off of...
Click to read more »amendment means different things to different people even with the latest SCOTUS rulings that the lead should be as impartial as possible. This is normal...
Click to read more »significantly about her where her name isn't necessarily in the headline (e.g. "SCOTUS battle crashes into decisive Senate race in Iowa," Politico, James Arkin...
Click to read more »template at Template:SCOTUS URL Docket New, which takes two parameters to create a URL. I want to edit the currently used Template:SCOTUS URL Docket, which...
Click to read more »--Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC) What SCOTUS permits is irrelevant to us. Citing it is a red-herring, and a serious sign...
Click to read more »http · block user · block log) has been running rampant vandalizing some SCOTUS pages recently, and his talk page shows that he was warned as far back as...
Click to read more »unconstitutional, again as established in the courts (though with the current SCOTUS interpreting the First Amendment as conferring the right to impose your...
Click to read more »making incorrect claims about things Jayron32 said. FormalDude said that "SCOTUS has been killing the VRA softly for decades anyways" and implied that's...
Click to read more »Why? Because that way I can spot my own content in a thread. Freaking SCOTUS uses Century Schoolbook and that's enough of a respectability endorsement...
Click to read more »challenged (via reversion)" it doesn't say much about your ability to interpret SCOTUS decisions. --▸₷truthious Ⓑandersnatch◂ 14:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »10:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Yes it is, as very recently re-affirmed by the SCOTUS: see here GoldenRing (talk) 09:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC) You guys. WP:NOTFREESPEECH...
Click to read more »weren't up to scratch. The vitriol poured on the Miami Bridge Collapse, the SCOTUS noms, and that Baltimore shooting are whats "telling" here. --LaserLegs...
Click to read more »upheld in 2008 (i imagine thats a different law a new law was enacted). SCOTUS rulings are nationalLihaas (talk) 11:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC) Does it matter...
Click to read more »mente aeternaliter facta" and "in qua dicitur non esse". Both are from John Scotus Eriugena. Thank you in advance for your kindly help. —Preceding unsigned...
Click to read more »short opinion. That's a good point you raise though; I've never watched the SCOTUS docket closely enough to see the bulk of the non-substantial opinions. Shadowjams...
Click to read more »period some leading Continental scholars were exponents, including Johannes Scotus Eriugena and Odo of Cluny; the most influential hermeneutic writer was the...
Click to read more »the United States seems to agree with that view as well. Not that what SCOTUS thinks really matters here, I just found it interesting that they don't...
Click to read more »User:Ujjwal Krishna states where he lives and even has a photograph of himself on his userpage. This obviously comes under WP:CHILD. Thought I should bring...
Click to read more »count state solicitors general as automatically notable, and arguing a SCOTUS case is just a function of that job. BD2412 T 21:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to be of your roles as trailblazers on the path leading to this week’s SCOTUS decision. I know it hasn’t been smooth or easy, but your courage and determination...
Click to read more »example, prefer to use links from NYTimes or WaPost in writing up cover of SCOTUS cases than, say USA Today, Ap/Reuters, CNN, or LA times, only as those sources...
Click to read more »category could even include the First Amendment, and the courts (including SCOTUS) that have struck down pro-Creationism laws because of it. Hrafn42 18:40...
Click to read more »was unconstitutional. Hollingworth (a pro-prop-8 guy) took the matter to SCOTUS, which ruled that he didn't have standing. In the Trump's hair case, maybe...
Click to read more »which, to be clear is not the same case as here) seems to indicate that SCOTUS is going in the direction of considering work by State officials as PD....
Click to read more »com/news/articles/1424996/19970912/story.jhtml www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/01/27/scotus.barbie/ news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2150432.stm. 2007-12-31 09:45:45: User...
Click to read more »Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 06:10, 16 December 2005 (UTC) Keep. SCOTUS cases are inherently notable. And Zordrac's argument is absurd; the Supreme...
Click to read more »(File:TaftOfficial Portrait.jpg with File:William Howard Taft as Chief Justice SCOTUS.jpg). According to the White House Historical Association, the portrait's...
Click to read more »opinion every SCOTUS law clerk is notable enough to have an article. But maybe not everyone agrees with me. BTW: Each of you may check that SCOTUS law clerk...
Click to read more »positively cited by a state's highest court, a federal appellate court, or SCOTUS, or has been cited in a law review article. I know Lexis and Westlaw have...
Click to read more »com/news/articles/1424996/19970912/story.jhtml www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/01/27/scotus.barbie/ news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2150432.stm. 2007-12-31 09:56:42: User...
Click to read more »for the future: In this month currently includes File:Sonia Sotomayor in SCOTUS robe.jpg, which is now a featured picture. You may like to add it to the...
Click to read more »what SCOTUS has or has not ruled regarding detainees. This points out why this entire article is a bad idea in the first place. Because SCOTUS has not...
Click to read more »the Supreme Court — mention that it is Washington's supreme court, not SCOTUS. Fixed ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 12:41, 22 December 2021 (UTC) equivalent...
Click to read more »weight presented in news sources to show this nickname is lasting past the SCOTUS nomination process. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »{{SCOTUS-Jay-stub}} {{SCOTUS-Rutledge-stub}} {{SCOTUS-Ellsworth-stub}} {{SCOTUS-Marshall-stub}} {{SCOTUS-Taney-stub}} {{SCOTUS-Chase-stub}} {{SCOTUS-Waite-stub}}...
Click to read more »or nonexistent cases have been removed from the list. Auto-populated the SCOTUS bench in {{Infobox US Supreme Court case}} so we could stop using a key-value...
Click to read more »Margary Y James Margetson Y Moses Margoliouth Ralph Marham Scotus Marianus Marianus Scotus Y William Mariner Earls Marischal Adam de Marisco Geoffrey...
Click to read more »(Halbrook for instance has been significantly involved in all of the recent SCOTUS gun control cases, and many of the lower court cases, including District_of_Columbia_v...
Click to read more »What I would call it (as did the SCOTUS) is unconstitutional. Objective3000 (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC) While SCOTUS has deemed prayer in school unconstitutional...
Click to read more »Alfred Schütz Albert Schweitzer Leonardo Sciasia Sir Walter Scott John Duns Scotus Augustin Eugène Scribe Roger Scruton John Searle Ronald Searle Winfried...
Click to read more »that are sourced to the SCOTUS instead of an appropriate scholarly source." Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC) SCOTUS is absolutely a Reliable...
Click to read more »from opposite parties there's more of a negotiation: both of Clinton's SCOTUS nominees (Breyer and Ginsberg) were run by (or maybe suggested by) Orrin...
Click to read more »attorney did not proffer mitgating evidence. The case next went before SCOTUS for review because the means of execution was imported from outside the...
Click to read more »September 2013 (UTC) Is there a reason that the suggested format for WP:SCOTUS/SG articles was not followed? It would have simplified some of the following...
Click to read more »struck everything except the comment about the sentence describing the SCOTUS denials of petition; it stills seems clumsy to me. However, that's not enough...
Click to read more »superior court in the state appellate court, and eventually was taken to SCOTUS). In any event, this peculiar procedural posture, combined with the fact...
Click to read more »except a claim that she discovered an important RNA exonuclease. Her total Scotus citations are 11K, but of this the top two are massive team publications...
Click to read more »could avoid having a Republican dominated Senate block all her nominees for SCOTUS... all she would have to do is consult with the Republican leadership first...
Click to read more »(UTC) I believe that's under the assumption that everyone will vote. For SCOTUS confirmations, that's usually a pretty safe assumption, though of course...
Click to read more »2007-10-20 15:01:33: User fi:Tomisti (talk - contribs) to fi:Johannes Scotus Eriugena (diff). Links: www.newadvent.org/cathen/05519a.htm. 2007-10-20...
Click to read more »to New Chrysler". This was not a SCOTUS case, SCOTUS just issued per curiam denial, so it doesn't fall under a SCOTUS case notability aspect. Most of the...
Click to read more »Also, informing others of an ongoing vote like User:Postdlf did on the WP:SCOTUS talk page seems more appropriate to me rather than contacting individual...
Click to read more »to read them to find out. Wnt (talk) 00:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC) The SCOTUS decision was not an unconditional ban. I think the best policy is to link...
Click to read more »the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Template:SCOTUS term for US volume (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) It...
Click to read more »they will naturally relate more to their own country's type of government. SCOTUS is charged with the job of interpretation in the US because there are American...
Click to read more »rampant in American economic policy, is a defining principle of Fascism. The SCOTUS Citizens United Ruling simply ensconced the corporatists/statist basis of...
Click to read more »non-existant). The only difference between US democratic and US convservative SCOTUS members is whether they think the individual is more valuable than the entire...
Click to read more »Corvus cornix 18:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC) I think the problem is that {{start SCOTUS clerk table}} contains headers, which are available to edit (so are counted)...
Click to read more »the template documentation, this template is used with List of pending SCOTUS cases when there are cases scheduled for argument. We're currently in between...
Click to read more »'in support'. Speaking for myself only: ater taking a deeper interest in SCOTUS Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015 and then the 2016 election I found some(?)...
Click to read more »Station. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 03:51, 11 December 2025 (UTC) Pause on the SCOTUS case. I can remake it from scratch as a Stub pretty quickly (hopefully tomorrow)...
Click to read more »reporter.lcms.org/2022/lcms-president-rev-dr-matthew-c-harrison-addresses-scotus-decision/ (R/Xmeta/L) 2022-07-05 02:52:32 (UTC): User DMWittenberg t • c •...
Click to read more »was most recently decided and expanded upon in Printz v. United States a SCOTUS gun control case dealing with the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act...
Click to read more »"win" for the defendant (the lower court's decision remains in effect). SCOTUS tradition holds that ""no affirmative action can be had in a cause where...
Click to read more »mean per se notability. Every U.S. President, every Congressman, every SCOTUS Justice gets an article because by attaining that position they are necessarily...
Click to read more »stated Puerto Rico is not part of the United States and, while on occasion SCOTUS "considers" Puerto Rico part of the United States, it does so in a handy...
Click to read more »those intersted in becoming SCOTUS law clerks, this article shows which circuit and district judges have sent law clerks to SCOTUS; (3) this article is a useful...
Click to read more »separate article is generally appropriate." Davis has taken her fight to SCOTUS; she's been jailed for contempt of court; she's the subject of satire and...
Click to read more »Eratosthenes Alonso de Ercilla y Zúñiga Loula Grace Erdman Louise Erdrich John Scotus Erigena Venedikt Erofeev Victor Erofeev Wolfram von Eschenbach Maurits Cornelis...
Click to read more »YAdam de Marisco -> Adam Marsh YAdam Murimuthensis YAdam of Orlton YAdam Scotus - Adam of Dryburgh YAdam de Stratton YAdam of Usk YAlexander Adam YCharles...
Click to read more »interpretation thereof that could be applied. It would be one thing if this was a SCOTUS decision in Google's favor, but as a lower court simply dismissing the case...
Click to read more »combined readership of probably 100k-1M over the TfD period), this on every US SCOTUS case, this on 1,956,845 transclusions (later had to be disabled), this on...
Click to read more »perhaps be made for the Supreme Court justices - there's probably analysis of SCOTUS deaths in office even if it's non-defining for categorization purposes....
Click to read more »secures copyright to the portions of the work owned by the publisher, as SCOTUS summarized in 2001: "Pre-1976 copyright law recognized a freelance author's...
Click to read more »Merge/Redirect - Right now, not knowing how the SCOTUS will decide the other case, it could be possible that the SCOTUS case article may grow considerably particularly...
Click to read more »statute unless the tribe is already federally recognized, and a recent SCOTUS decision limits it even further. Further, the fact that the tribe is contesting...
Click to read more »1037, twice translated; bis remains discovered, 1664. John Scotus , Eriugena (d. 875). See Scotus. John de Villula (d. 1122), bishop of Bath; originally a...
Click to read more »in a subject have been just as appalled about missing details (in "Duns Scotus" or "Abelard"), as compared to casual readers appalled that village articles...
Click to read more »article if and when the protests have notability independent of the actual SCOTUS case. Predictions that this will become independently notable are just predictons...
Click to read more »far three, count-em, three of their habeas petitions have arrived at the SCOTUS. So, no, they aren't trivial. I remain concerned that you approved the adding...
Click to read more »13:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC) Per the old request at Template talk:Infobox SCOTUS case#Links to dates, would it be possible to update the template code so...
Click to read more »don't even consider the third of the discussion at Template_talk:Infobox_SCOTUS_case, which involves continual whining about the non-functionality of en-dashes...
Click to read more »the article was about), and "parties who are the primary parties" (in a SCOTUS case, where the article title is United States v. Kagama - i.e., both parties)...
Click to read more »Pinetalk 04:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Promoted File:Sonia Sotomayor in SCOTUS robe.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 22:54, 21 August 2011 (UTC) Voting period...
Click to read more »2A00:23C8:4384:FB00:354E:690B:4FF5:390F (talk) 23:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Does the SCOTUS already answered the question if setting a "Troll-Comment" in the Internet...
Click to read more »underlies the Supreme Court decision on Texas secession in 1868. In effect, SCOTUS ruled that as the people of America as a whole are sovereign, only they...
Click to read more »I clicked on it. The problem is that it goes, not to an article on the SCOTUS justice's father, but to an article on another Potter G Stewart who was...
Click to read more »of a non-relevant article in this paper is necessary to understand the SCOTUS case are, at best, baseless. It is just a picture of a headline and some...
Click to read more »Plus that was a circuit court decision: I've no idea what the current SCOTUS would say. 2601:644:8501:AAF0:0:0:0:6032 (talk) 03:07, 1 September 2023...
Click to read more »they don't have public law numbers, they are not signed by a president, SCOTUS is not a relevant court, Congress is not a relevant body, and the list goes...
Click to read more »edit the article to include more of the SCOTUS nominee's response, which is linked to. The Dean is NOT a SCOTUS nominee (even if she was, it would make...
Click to read more »is the subject of the article is more on the judicial interpretation by SCOTUS from c. 1919 onward of the 1st Amendment than on its proposal or adoption...
Click to read more »period ends on 25 Jun 2013 at 15:27:07 (UTC) Reason I was looking around the SCOTUS blog, out off curiosity about the major cases coming up - for those that...
Click to read more »December 2008 (UTC) Keep - This has to be a notable legal case, whether the SCOTUS hands down judgments or not. The question of whether Obama is legally qualified...
Click to read more »or we won't grant you approval'. Florence spent a million dollars up to SCOTUS, w/ Tigard reimbursing her, and then the city of Tigard held her up procedurally...
Click to read more »to comment on issues for which he is an expert; 4, member of the bar of SCOTUS. Verification: 1, named author at link for law review article; 2, named...
Click to read more »SCOTUS does make the subject of the article notable. Sorry; I cannot answer where articles appear for the others banned in a similar way by theSCOTUS;...
Click to read more »challenged they would be invalidated at every court level from District through SCotUS, because all the statutory and case law regarding the American governments'...
Click to read more »as written certainly implies that this is so. There's a whole bunch of SCOTUS cases, ALL of which were about citizenship at birth, but the way that section...
Click to read more »works that had fallen into the public domain in the US. In a 6-2 decision, SCOTUS affirmed the decision of the district court. The principle findings were:...
Click to read more »2003:D5:AF0E:DE00:C4C7:395C:56A3:A782 (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC) The SCOTUS may be quite busy with executive orders for a while. Quite possible, that...
Click to read more »Strathearn move request by Zacwill16 was closed; discussion 27 Sep 2015 – Duns Scotus move request by Zacwill16 was closed; discussion 28 Nov 2017 – Andrew de...
Click to read more »notability is not inherited. While many SCOTUS cases are notable, not all are - as you can see, not every SCOTUS caae has an article now. the only sources...
Click to read more »article, is stable, and is written in accordance with WP:MOSLAW and WP:SCOTUS criteria, especially in regards to the Bluebook reference style (which is...
Click to read more »lamp missing as much as it probably offends the maintenance staff of the SCOTUS. The building probably doesn't have a lamp missing very often, and as such...
Click to read more »not both please. As for images, there are basically only 4 in use: the SCOTUS seal and two portraits of justices fall in the public domain, and the city...
Click to read more »Cay User:Econmath/David Schmeidler User:Ecseifert/sandbox User:EdEColbert/scotus User:EdGilmour/20 Golden Greats - The Shadows User:EdGilmour/Federico Sandi...
Click to read more »the Guantanamo captives were released prior to reviews required by the SCOTUS in 2004, and we know essentially nothing about approximately 150 of them...
Click to read more »politics emerged from then-President Obama using the word while looking for a SCOTUS nominee in 2009. See here. From web search for "empathize right on your...
Click to read more »5.57 (talk) 21:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC) I was reading Windsor's brief to SCOTUS (Marriage cases) concerning DOMA. It raised a curious legal tangent that...
Click to read more »human creativity (like phonebooks) are not copyrightable. Mind that this is SCOTUS so the decisions will not apply outside of the United States. So it is always...
Click to read more »although I have to point out that SCOTUS's procedures are completely irrelevant to Wikipedia's procedures :) SCOTUS precedent is considered binding, lower...
Click to read more »down. The SCOTUS being fond of including multipart tests (try searching for "three-pronged test"; most of what you'll get is related to SCOTUS case law)...
Click to read more »