Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
instructions for how and why to create a request for comment (RfC), to participate in one, and to end one. RfC is one of several processes available within Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFC/AWP:RFC/A WP:RFC/AllWP:RFC/All The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC (closed), Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 3 (closed), Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 4 (closed) and Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 5 (closed) MALFORMED RFC Darkwarriorblake...
Click to read more »THIS RFC IS CLOSED - Please do not edit Shortcut WP:RFAr/RFCWP:RFAr/RFC The Arbitration Committee has a problem to pose to the community, and would like...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC (closed), Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 2 (closed), Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 4 (closed) and Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 5 (closed) Ran across...
Click to read more »For a summary of the RfC and discussion on how to move forward, see this talk page thread. The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it...
Click to read more »RFCs include both article RFCs and user RFCs. This is a proposed reform to user RFCs. Different interpretations of what a user RFC is have led to some...
Click to read more »in discussions at WT:MOSNUM. Thank you! Shortcut WP:MOSNUM/RFCWP:MOSNUM/RFC The use of date autoformatting presently available in Wikipedia is overloaded...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFC/AEEWP:RFC/AEE WP:RFC/SEGWP:RFC/SEG A request for comment on the concept of self-electing groups on Wikipedia. Are self-electing groups...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/ATWP:RFC/AT The following discussions related to article topics are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 2 (closed), Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 3 (closed) and Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 4 (closed), Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 5 (closed) The question...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFC/AATWP:RFC/AAT WP:RFC/ABORTIONWP:RFC/ABORTION Contents 1 Preamble 2 Proposals on titles 3 Discussion 4 Comments by the community (Vote)...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:EF/RFCWP:EF/RFC In a case involving the use of edit filters, the Arbitration Committee recommended here that "the community is encouraged...
Click to read more »write about it. Also, just as wikipedia isn't an RFC repository, it's not an RFC index either. RFC 3377 is mentioned as the latest version of the LDAP...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/PAIDWP:RFC/PAID The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. An RFC on the...
Click to read more »modeled on WP:RFC might look. Please discuss at the talk page or make improvements by editing this page. See also Wikipedia:RFA as RFC/Werdna, a trial...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this discussion. Shortcuts WP:RFC/AFWP:RFC/AF WP:RFC/AFTWP:RFC/AFT This is a requests for comment about article feedback....
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/PWTWP:RFC/PWT The following discussions related to project-wide topics are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up...
Click to read more »with the ongoing controversy over how the community and those involved in RFCs should behave. It is based on empirical observation of what arguments have...
Click to read more »23–30) Results Debrief RFC workshop RFC phase ← October 2024 RFC phase July 2025 RFC phase December 2025 → RFC phase Below are some RFCs about proposed changes...
Click to read more »Requests for Comments (RFCs) can be improved. The BLP RFC is a notable recent example illustrating the need to improve the workings of RFC on issues that involve...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete-- this isn't Wikisource. RFC 1 was important historically, but this should be a page *about* RFC 1. Marnanel 03:30, Apr 14, 2004 (UTC) Take...
Click to read more »of this RFC is the ScottyBerg block by ArbCom. In this RFC are some proposals to continue discussion at the Village Pump, or initiate other RFCs. Most of...
Click to read more »February 2006 (UTC) Closed. There are many opinions regarding the User RFC process (WP:RFC/USER) held by a variety of people, and a number of perennial complaints...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFC/NAMEWP:RFC/NAME WP:RFCNWP:RFCN This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Wikipedia's username policy...
Click to read more »poll, it was suggested that WP:RFC is not taken seriously enough, and that this primarily stems from the inability of RFC to actually enforce anything....
Click to read more »talk:Did you know Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (events)...
Click to read more »(An incomplete list of adminbot runners is available here.) Reason for the RFC. There seems to not be enough knowledge of adminbots among the broader community;...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RSP RFC 2025WP:RSP RFC 2025 The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section...
Click to read more »and Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-01-14/Technology_report Note: This RFC will be scheduled to close at 00:01 February 1, to allow enough time for...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/SPUIWP:RFC/SPUI In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve...
Click to read more »there have been three previous RFC on this topic. Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 2 Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 3 The User is invited to consider...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:votes for undeletion. Created by same user as Rfc 1, as well as now-deleted List of rfc, which contained a list of HUNDREDS of such file names...
Click to read more »more modest position is being advanced. On Wikipedia, this can occur in WP:RFCs or other formal discussion processes; someone might ask one question, which...
Click to read more »Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Archive.is_RFC . This RFC (public request for comment) followed discussion at the Administrators...
Click to read more »page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Shortcut WP:RFC/JWP:RFC/J This is a discussion to decide the content of the lead section of the...
Click to read more »Shortcut Wikipedia:RFC/TS2Wikipedia:RFC/TS2 In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried...
Click to read more »Debrief RFC workshop RFC phase ← December 2025 RFC workshop May 2026 RFC workshop October 2026 → RFC workshop This page was for drafting mini RFCs to change...
Click to read more »Debrief RFC workshop RFC phase ← October 2024 RFC workshop July 2025 RFC workshop December 2025 → RFC workshop This page is for drafting mini RFCs to change...
Click to read more »1) Results Debrief RFC workshop RFC phase October 2024 RFC workshop July 2025 → RFC workshop This page is for drafting mini RFCs to change the administrator...
Click to read more »modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. moved from WT:RFC. Ncmvocalist (talk) 17:11, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Hi, not sure where else...
Click to read more »{{rfc|prop}} (RFC notice) The main page hasn't been redesigned since 2006. This RFC intends to develop design criteria for a new main page by discussing...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RESPONDER-RFCWP:RESPONDER-RFC Proposed: A 3-month trial of a new role to allow users who are reporting a high-speed vandal at AIV to also...
Click to read more »Complete RfC: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee. These statements and responses were last updated at 2023-02-27 09:47:25. Unless closed...
Click to read more »rejection is only for the current request about the RFC about that issue. If the dispute continues after that RFC is over, then a new application may be made...
Click to read more »modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. Note for the first RFC on Cush see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cush Cush (talk · contribs · deleted contribs ·...
Click to read more »been lead to by (often controversial) discussions at WT:FICT, WP:Notability/RFC:compromise, and WT:N, not to mention the countless AFD's in which notability...
Click to read more »Shortcut Wikipedia:RFC/POTWWikipedia:RFC/POTW In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they...
Click to read more »view edit history watch archive talk purge Shortcut WP:RFC/BLPContentWP:RFC/BLPContent This RFC is now closed. This is a request for comment regarding...
Click to read more »summary of the conclusions reached follows. During this recent Village pump RFC it was decided, that the results of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/OTHERWP:RFC/OTHER This page has been deprecated. The other topical RFC pages are broad enough to contain any topic brought up on RFC, and it...
Click to read more »For the result of the RFC see : #Closure. The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate...
Click to read more »13–19) Results Debrief RFC workshop RFC phase ← December 2025 RFC phase May 2026 RFC phase October 2026 → RFC phase Below are some RFCs about proposed changes...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/NE2WP:RFC/NE2 In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried...
Click to read more »section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows. I've closed this RFC in response from a plea on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard for a non...
Click to read more »This page will serve as WP:RFCBEFORE and a draft for a future RFC at WP:VPPR. Normally, SecurePoll elections are created on https://vote.wikimedia.org...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/DHWP:RFC/DH In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a...
Click to read more »script. Once the user confirms the RFC by clicking on the URL in their email, the bot will proceed to post the RFC on the wiki. I am aware that the bot...
Click to read more »script, I will post it to User:RFC bot/rfcbot.php Function overview: To post on users' talk, asking them to comment on RFCs. The service is strictly opt-in...
Click to read more »not think this use of an RFC (I have seen user page RFCs in presence of RFC/U and I guess they would be class apart from RFC/U). This does not interfere...
Click to read more »WT:CAT#Eponymous cats. Please read the below, then share your thoughts on the RFC discussion page. Many articles share their name with a corresponding category:...
Click to read more »title option 2. --v/r - TP 20:51, 10 November 2012 (UTC) Shortcut WP:RFC/AAMCWP:RFC/AAMC Current progress Structure Completed 1 October–19 October Review...
Click to read more »(UTC) I have no problem with the removal in principle. RFCs should be deleted only when the RFC policy says they should be deleted, so my first impulse...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/SVWP:RFC/SV In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a...
Click to read more »(UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Seghill RFC Articles for deletion/Seghill RFC (2nd nomination) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/CDWP:RFC/CD In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a...
Click to read more »Shortcut Wikipedia:RFC/N75Wikipedia:RFC/N75 In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried...
Click to read more »judged on the merits. That makes my task, in closing this RFC, that much easier. In reviewing this RFC, I am mindful of the fact that 124 editors participated...
Click to read more »WP:ENDPORTALSWP:ENDPORTALS Moved from Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 147 § RfC: Ending the system of portals – Hi everybody. Because this discussion has...
Click to read more »Pump discussion was broadly favourable, it is being formally listed as an RFC in order to ensure clear support from the community before implementation...
Click to read more »characters, and abundance of useless <nowiki>s. Pages load much faster. The first RFC opened 13 years ago. Hence, it may be time to re-evaluate consensus on whether...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/AfDWP:RFC/AfD In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve...
Click to read more »Shortcut Wikipedia:RFC/TS1Wikipedia:RFC/TS1 In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried...
Click to read more »the discussion was delete. The RfC has been filed. AniMate 16:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC) Appears to be a tit for tat RFC/U about inflated issues of sourcing...
Click to read more »Per a request at WP:RFC, this discussion is closed with the consensus being that ticker symbols are not necessary in the article lead. The view receiving...
Click to read more »permitted to draft RfCs in userspace, with the implied understanding that said RFC needs to be filed in a reasonable amount of time. It's only been there for...
Click to read more »This is a request for comment (RfC) on the use of spoiler tags. This RFC aims to gather community opinion on the Wikipedia:Spoiler warning guidelines...
Click to read more »(UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Blyth RFC Articles for deletion/Blyth RFC (2nd nomination) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RECALLRFCWP:RECALLRFC WP:RECALL/RFCWP:RECALL/RFC This is a list of former and ongoing discussions, notably requests for comment, about the...
Click to read more »for this article: Articles for deletion/North Shields RFC Articles for deletion/North Shields RFC (2nd nomination) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »{{rfc|soc|hist}} Which of the following approaches should be used as the overall structure for the article on Mass killings under communist regimes? The...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:RFC/BLPWP:RFC/BLP WP:BLPRFCWP:BLPRFC The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a...
Click to read more »Macon (talk • contribs) 20:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC) What this RfC is not This RfC is not binding on anyone. It is purely advisory. The Wikipedia Arbitration...
Click to read more »00:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC) User:009o9/Draft NSONGS RFC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) RFC draft created by indef-blocked user to use as a...
Click to read more »The result was no consensus. Sandstein 18:14, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Seghill RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, the above's replacement WP:RFC/N, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names WP:RFC/U, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct...
Click to read more »for this article: Articles for deletion/Ashington JW RFC Articles for deletion/Ashington JW RFC (2nd nomination) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/FOPWP:RFC/FOP In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried...
Click to read more »WP:BLPRFCWP:BLPRFC WP:BLPRFC3WP:BLPRFC3 WP:BLPRFCIIIWP:BLPRFCIII The previous RFCs held at this location may be found at WP:BLPRFC1 and WP:BLPRFC2. Wikipedia:Requests...
Click to read more »REVIEWED AND CLOSED After having analyzed every word of this RfC in detail I have formulated the closing statement below. A bureaucrat may not resysop...
Click to read more »AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/West Hartlepool RFC Under 18 West Hartlepool RFC Under 18 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »| RFC phase The RFC phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started. There are 10 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase...
Click to read more »summary or view, other than to endorse. After the disputes in the the last RFC have vanished, NE2 has yet again engaged in user conduct issues again, though...
Click to read more »| RFC phase The RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase...
Click to read more »This is a list of all the comments that were broken in the RFC page for clarity and ease of discussion. The comments here are primarily only the ones...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles/RFC on pharmaceutical drug prices Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#RFC_on_pharmaceutical_drug_prices Simvastatin's...
Click to read more »the talk page Eventually, often after pages of discussion and voting, an RfC perhaps, and a close which is also argued about, the sentence that Editor...
Click to read more »The RFC phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started. There are 10 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at...
Click to read more »of North Macedonia. In June 2018, the Arbitration Committee authorised an RFC to change the naming conventions for Macedonia. Now that the name change...
Click to read more »related pages: Neyland RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Pembroke Dock Harlequins RFC (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »WP:RFC.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Note: I have taken the initiative to start rewriting Wikipedia:Rules for Fools based on this RFC. Feel...
Click to read more »User:Gnixon/Intelligent design RfC Duelling RFCs never solved anything - the fact that the groups involved are not coming together on a single RFC to resolve their...
Click to read more »comment believed to be active on 4 June 2013 linked from subpages of Wikipedia:RfC or watchlist notices. ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 5 June 2013 Discussion...
Click to read more »attention from the wider community. If accepted, the RFC would work differently from current RFCs. They would be structured discussions that would present...
Click to read more »(moved it to the rfc's talk) This has been under heavy attack and is linked to from the front page. I've semi protected which has calmed things down a...
Click to read more »I'm formally closing this RFC as per a request to do so at Wikipedia:Requests for closure. There have been no substantive edits in a month so I think...
Click to read more » The result was delete. — Scientizzle 02:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC) Morpeth RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »are autolinked by the Wikipedia software; see Wikipedia:ISBN. RFC references such as "RFC 2821" are also autolinked. PMIDs are also autolinked; see Wikipedia:PMID...
Click to read more »Closing statement for Article Creation at Scale RFC. Panel close by: -- RoySmith (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC) Katietalk 22:51, 4 November 2022...
Click to read more »BARC de-adminship proposal; Wikimania recordings debate: An RFC proposes to create a "Bureaucrats' Admin Review Committee" (BARC) composed of bureaucrats...
Click to read more »soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Sandstein 18:15, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Blyth RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »service is a voluntary service to increase awareness of Requests for Comments (RFCs) and other discussions on Wikipedia. This page has a number of lists organized...
Click to read more »(an RfC/U) is for discussing specific users who have violated Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Carefully read the following before filing an RfC. Disputes...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link rfc-of-oeb.narod.ru; 0 records. rfc-of-oeb.narod.ru: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr...
Click to read more »2012 Wikipedia:RfA reform (continued) Wikipedia:RFC on RFA Reform Wikipedia:RFC reform Wikipedia:User RFC reform Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-02-06/News...
Click to read more »meet the relevant standards. DGG ( talk ) 02:45, 3 July 2016 (UTC) Yatton RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more » The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:59, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Hardmen RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »this RfC is no longer applicable, things have evolved a lot in the past few months and after the other RfC, but it still has value to close this RfC and...
Click to read more »delete. WP:REFUND applies. Sandstein 18:15, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Ponteland RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Shortcuts WP:RFC/5MWP:RFC/5M WP:5MRFCWP:5MRFC At 04:04, 10 October 2015 (UTC), a village pump thread...
Click to read more »response to the RFC requesting that Gather be disabled in Beta on the English Wikipedia. We propose to address the concerns raised in the RFC in the following...
Click to read more »These are the results of the Endorsement phase of the RFC, which was active from 8 March 2011-20 March 2011, when it was archived and replaced with the...
Click to read more »been run in different ways, but there are a few hard and fast rules: An RfC on user conduct MUST have the following in its structure: A statement of...
Click to read more »closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 16:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC) Railway Union RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »no sources, WP:V is policy. Courcelles 21:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC) AIB RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Singularity 08:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Bede RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows. I have closed this RFC as successful. As such, I have added this paragraph to WP:ADMIN. Wording...
Click to read more »process continued. Newer entries towards the top This page only displays user RFCs from the most recent year and the current year, older discussions can be...
Click to read more »feedback on the election process. Shortcuts WP:ACERFCWP:ACERFC WP:RFC/ACE2016WP:RFC/ACE2016 WP:ACE2016RFCWP:ACE2016RFC This is a request for comment about...
Click to read more »disclosed legitimate accounts to Arbcom) Timeline: Electoral Commission RFC: Now - Saturday 23:59, 17 November (see below) Nominations: Sunday 00:01...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/COIWP:RFC/COI The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary...
Click to read more » The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC) CARBS RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »discussion on Requests for Adminship reform. This is a bit different from other RFCs because of the protracted nature of this dispute, in that it is a bit more...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »An RfC was opened here on October 5 to ask whether "the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth" should be removed. As this is...
Click to read more »this page, seek community input at a forum such as the village pump. The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of this discussion. Other dispute...
Click to read more »be deleted. The current date and time is: 23:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC). This RFC concerns the behavior of editors from the United States Congress Specific...
Click to read more »discussion. The purpose of this RfC is to address some issues with Wikipedia's dispute resolution system. In particular, this RfC focuses on the lack of substantive...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »this proposal is now being finessed into a draft RFC Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC, which, if adopted, will create a new process. The...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »{{rfc|soc|hist}} Which of the following approaches should be used as the overall structure for the article on Mass killings under communist regimes? A...
Click to read more »delete. WP:REFUND applies. Sandstein 18:14, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Ashington JW RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »collaboration is ongoing. 1. Brainstorming for the RFC discussion To be done at the talk page by those interested. The RFC should be designed as to give us design...
Click to read more »(glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Hartford Wanderers RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »community Requests for Comment, Wikipedia:VisualEditor/RFC and Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Default State RFC. Changes have been made to VisualEditor since the VisualEditor...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Blue Ox RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »Per a request at WP:AN/RFC this RfC is closed as it depends or no consensus depending on your viewpoint. There is a large consensus that a city population...
Click to read more »Plague" (of nationalism, but similar issues can apply on religion), this RFC is to brainstorm/examine ideas which might help with the general problem...
Click to read more »changes and implement those supported by consensus. Thus, I’ve started the RfC a month earlier to commence the planning stages. In the case of proposals...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »MediaViewer RfC, as closed by Armbrust response to the results of the RfC by Fabrice Florin discussion of how to implement the results of the RfC AN discussion...
Click to read more »discussion. This is a request for comment (RFC) regarding turning on the Memento extension. This is a preliminary RFC to assess community interest among English...
Click to read more »delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:14, 16 September 2012 (UTC) Cambrian Welfare RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »consensus for much of anything. Discussion is confused, and the structure of the RfC makes it difficult to follow what's being supported by whom and with what...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »responses found the tool "useful" and 61% did not.[3] RfC: Wikipedia:Media Viewer/June 2014 RfC was closed with 63 editors calling for it to be disabled...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:RFC/AAMCWP:RFC/AAMC Current progress Structure In progress 1 October–15 October Review and refine arguments surrounding premises, conclusion...
Click to read more »(glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Stirling University RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »(glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Old Streetonians RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »Oppose all changes. There's currently a big RFC running on this topic, as Matt has linked. Either the CFD and RFC will reach identical conclusions, making...
Click to read more »and provisions of the RFC process – that frivolous RFCs are removed from Wikipedia. If we allow users may make copies of failed RFCs and keep them open in...
Click to read more »delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC) Carl Taylor (Stourbridge RFC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. This was a lengthy RfC and took quite some reading. Thank you for your patience in awaiting a close...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 20:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC) St Austell RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »archive and move on. Issues about Durova's conduct are properly raised at an RFC, issues about oversight at Wikipedia talk:Oversight, and so on. The rest...
Click to read more »requestable permission edit filter, or community standard, pending another RFC and technical information from WMF. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:56, 13 January...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »been run in different ways, but there are a few hard and fast rules: An RfC on user conduct MUST have the following in its structure: A statement of...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »notability end in "no consensus". The lack of consensus has prompted this RFC. Wikipedians from all points of view have tried to find a middle ground....
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »is Unblocking pre-2009 indefinitely-blocked IPs per RFC. Anomie⚔ 14:50, 5 May 2019 (UTC) The RFC this task will implement was previously advertised at...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! South Shields RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »{{rfc|policy|media}} Background: Since 2008, the policy governing future films has been ambiguous, with two predominant and conflicting interpretations...
Click to read more »block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) Beit Or (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) Canadian Monkey...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) This user...
Click to read more »The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Cotham Park RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »(non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Parkmore RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »settings. These changes resulted in discussion all over Wikipedia. This RFC is an attempt to centralise the discussion. Rd232 talk 15:46, 15 May 2010...
Click to read more »result was no consensus. Sandstein 18:15, 24 March 2018 (UTC) North Shields RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »appropriate): Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol#RfC on autopatrolling redirects Edit period(s): Continuous Estimated number of...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Renegades RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 14:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC) Sydney Irish RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »(non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Swords RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »bludgeoned the discussion to start this RFC's, original research in the opening prose. Anyone thinking this RFC is a neutral representation of current...
Click to read more » The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 18:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Bexley RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »from the RfC as not needing consensus, and the RfC was later snow-closed with consensus against all remaining proposed changes. January 2017: RFC to remove...
Click to read more »0825 RFC 0983 RFC 0985 RFC 0987 RFC 1 RFC 791 RFC 1006 RFC 1009 RFC 1066 RFC 1123 RFC 1144 RFC 1156 RFC 1394 RFC 1495 RFC 1632 RFC 1718 RFC 1776 RFC 1789...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Mariners RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »be deleted. WP:NAC—S Marshall T/C 09:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Clondalkin RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »Administrator Elections | Renewal RFC phase You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase III/Administrator...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Teachers RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »bot like http://toolserver.org/~messedrocker/postingscript.php and User:RFC posting script Editor help is appreciated. Assistance is needed with the...
Click to read more »Create that RFC, or follow the current policy. That's the options. --Jayron32 14:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC) Yes, I agree that we should start such an RFC about medical...
Click to read more »Fuchs (talk) & Maxim (talk) The WPMED dispute erupted after the drug pricing RFC, but the tension has involved broader issues since at least 2012. Wiki Project...
Click to read more »Moved to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RFC: Southern Poverty Law Center...
Click to read more »result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC) Beccehamians RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »be deleted. WP:NAC—S Marshall T/C 09:50, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Balbriggan RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »deleted the RfC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Deletion of VFD (archived version here) [1], on the purported grounds that it violated RfC policy; the...
Click to read more »comment (RFC) on the use of official photographs of Canadian government officials for which the copyrights are held by the Canadian government. This RFC aims...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »THIS RFC HAS BEEN ARCHIVED DO NOT EDIT IT Bigglove 00:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Commodore Sloat (talk · contribs · logs) Users should only edit one summary...
Click to read more »next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topic this week is Assign RFCs to ArchCom shepherds. The meeting will be on 24 February at 22:00 (UTC)....
Click to read more »fellow volunteers to change the leadership (without huge investment in an RFC such as this one). 3. It gives the wrong message to new FA participants that...
Click to read more »comments should be made in a new section. A large portion of this original RFC, which editors are now discussing, was moved to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC) Shotton Steel RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »21 May 2015 (UTC) Delete RFC/U doesn't exist anymore, so the transclusion would appear to be unnecessary. If something like RFC/U is re-invented in the...
Click to read more »resolution process: If there is another dispute resolution process (such as RFC) in progress for the dispute, it should be completed before requesting a...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »"fundraiser sitenotices aren't subject to community consensus".[3] This RFC follows on from Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 55#Abolish the...
Click to read more »(glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Pinner and Grammarians RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Note for the second RFC on Cush see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cush (second RFC) The following discussion is an archived record of an user conduct...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC) Killarney RFC Match Reports 2010-11 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »which was reverted by user:Volunteer Marek, [2] While the wording in the RFC originally had "accused", user:DrFleischman suggest the wording conclusion...
Click to read more »Several editors started to work out implementation details during this RfC and the community should figure out how to efficiently remove links to archive...
Click to read more »success of the past efforts at Dispute Resolution (DR) reform, the current RFC proposes we implement: 1) A submission gadget for every DR venue tailored...
Click to read more »an admin or Rfc-experienced editor please assess whether this Rfc should be closed based on no prior discussion on the Talk page? This Rfc seems highly...
Click to read more »(non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Coolmine RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) I am currently...
Click to read more »The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC) Celtic RFC, South Canterbury, NZ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »Jimbo. One to demand an RFC on the subject. Twelve to participate in the 30-day RFC. Four to nominate and ponder the close of the RFC at Discussions for discussion...
Click to read more »overturn then this RFC succeeds. What then? AdA&D ★ 00:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC) AdA&D, you are right. Editors ignore the results of RfC. We need a policy...
Click to read more »Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Genesis P-Orridge#RFC: is the idiosyncratic use of s/he and h/er acceptable in this article? Completed...
Click to read more »Two RFCs have been called regarding the behaviour of editors on this page: [1] and [2] . Feel free to comment if you wish. Please remove this notice after...
Click to read more »Drafting arbitrators: Seraphimblade (talk) & Roger Davies (talk) A previous RFC on this article was procedurally closed on January 26th by User:Nyttend because...
Click to read more »section. There is no RfC here (and certainly not a user conduct RfC). I have done nothing wrong and even the originator of this RfC, Evilphoenix, thinks...
Click to read more »discussion about inactive RFC/Us, I have decided to re-open the RFC/U about this user. To minimize confusion, I am starting a new RFC/U page with some more...
Click to read more »has not received a reply since five days ago. This RfC is a partial continuation of the first RfC that received no consensus between options A and D (now...
Click to read more »(glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Uudeküla Bulldogs RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) Have been...
Click to read more »in RFC 2119: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels. In these terms, strongly discouraged means SHOULD NOT. In the words of the RFC, while...
Click to read more »Eritrea RfC on the Eritrea page (e.g. removing "three and a half ... million") 15:00, 13 May 2021 repeat violation of the result of the spirit of the RfC, on...
Click to read more »relevant discussions (where appropriate): WP:Archive.is RFC, WP:Archive.is RFC 2, WP:Archive.is RFC 3, MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/December 2013#archive...
Click to read more »No local admins/bureaucrats/interface admins for 6 months from close of RFC During this time global sysops and stewards will patrol the wiki No permanent...
Click to read more »no consensus. v/r - TP 14:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC) Pinner and Grammerians RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »rfc · lta · spi · checkuser · socks ) 68.220.184.91 (talk · tag · contribs · count · WHOIS · ip details · trace · RBLs • logs · block log · arb · rfc ·...
Click to read more »REXXWARE RFC RFC 1014 RFC 1034 RFC 1035 RFC 1058 RFC 1081 RFC 1094 RFC 1112 RFC 1119 RFC 1123 RFC 1156 RFC 1157 RFC 1171 RFC 1208 RFC 1213 RFC 1267 RFC 1268...
Click to read more »prior knowledge. Many users do not read up on disputes that might reach RFC eventually. It is very unlikely that they know the history of the dispute...
Click to read more »Delete. — xaosflux Talk 02:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC) User:Adsbond/Rugby Welsh Rfc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly...
Click to read more »previous story). The RFC on BLP guidelines is ongoing, with input requested on the many proposals; there is a current motion to close the RFC by March 1st (see...
Click to read more »Blatant Promotion RFC, which resulted in a prohibition on company, website, or product names as usernames. Gigs coordinated the RFC, and describes it...
Click to read more »is also listed on RFC and involves GRider. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/GRider is also listed on RFC and involves GRider. A Request for...
Click to read more »held within a broader RFC on a different but related topic. It was specifically removed from the NSPORT page at the time of the RFC re-evaluating the criterion...
Click to read more »regional teams (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Fairwater RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Enniscorthy RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »WP:RFC/U, there was significant disagreement regarding the behavior of Arzel and other editors who took part in the WP:RFC/U. The pages in the WP:RFC/U...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) I'd love...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) Daily...
Click to read more »when you expect a typical number of responses. ==RfC: Is the photo in the History section relevant?== {{rfc|hist}} Should the "History" section contain a...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) I'm an...
Click to read more »lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) Formerly Gbambino (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) and Gbambino06...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC) User:Abben223/Edinburgh University Medics RFC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Obviously not going to be...
Click to read more »editor to go away or to be prevented from editing, you should not start an RFC. The opening comment should contain a straightforward question which is as...
Click to read more »other editors to comment on their edits or conduct, much like a voluntary RFC/U, or a peer review for users. ER spun off the (now inactive) Administrator...
Click to read more »de-adminship. To prevent abuse, this RFC must be certified by at least two admins (as opposed to two regular users, for a regular RFC). The defendant must be notified...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. By the RFC at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_107#Proposed_new_Draft_namespace...
Click to read more »marriage supporter have seen an explosion of discussion. On January 8 an RFC was opened (here) to determine if Dan Savage's website link should be included...
Click to read more »By Lionelt There are several open discussions at the Project: There is an RFC regarding Liberty University and its relationship to President Trump; see...
Click to read more »creator of this RFC expressed interest in resolving. While an "event coordinator" position/PERM has not yet been established (an RFC to create it will...
Click to read more »bot like http://toolserver.org/~messedrocker/postingscript.php and User:RFC posting script Editor help is appreciated. Assistance is needed with the...
Click to read more »HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:34, 25 November 2011 (UTC) RCSI RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »it has turned into a game of brinkmanship. Whatever the outcome of this RfC, I have no intention of wading back into that sort of environment. This is...
Click to read more »of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC) Charlotte Royals Rugby Football Club (RFC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »discussion was keep This clearly is a draft of an RFC that has yet to be filed. The merits of the rfc are not relevant to this discussion so any comments...
Click to read more »"Succeeded by"? If the consensus is for inclusion of these fields, a separate RFC can be held to determine what the fields should contain. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk)...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) I have...
Click to read more »achievable change. This time we will consider one specific, detailed proposal in RfC format. The proposal will run the usual 30 days, with a bias toward early...
Click to read more »but a perfect tutorial for anyone wanting to start a Request for Comment (RfC) and not wishing to be 'the guy trying to be the ringmaster of an out-of-control...
Click to read more »deprecated". The RFC, which was begun by CaptainEek on 5 August, drew a large amount of attention and discussion. A watchlist notice for the RFC was placed...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) Would...
Click to read more »people who want to see change from getting involved. Any editor may start a RFC on whether or not a government should be elected to deal with a specific...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) I do some...
Click to read more »consensus to delete. Regarding the ongoing RFC, my suggestion would be to make a note of this title, and wait for the RFC to finish. If it turns out that the...
Click to read more »Eritrea RfC on the Eritrea page (e.g. removing "three and a half ... million") 15:00, 13 May 2021 repeat violation of the result of the spirit of the RfC, on...
Click to read more »{{infobox video game}} Yobot (task 54) – Replace ISBN / PMID / RFC magiclinks with ISBN / PMID / RFC template TohaomgBot (task approval) – Replacing raster images...
Click to read more »it. No further edits should be made to this page. Closed by agreement of RFC-initiators. [1] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct Slrubenstein (talk ·...
Click to read more »Guard Corps,[1] similar to Tasnim News Agency which was deprecated in 2024 (RfC). There have been some discussions mentioning Fars either by itself (1) or...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) Reason...
Click to read more »Note: This RFC has been closed and re-opened. I request that this Rfc is closed for the minute to give User:Betacommand time to explain his actions RyanPostlethwaiteSee...
Click to read more »The result was no consensus. There appears to be a rough consensus at the RFC, although that doesn't help in this scenario as as Elmidae pointed out, there's...
Click to read more »This is a request for comment (RFC) on the use of fair use images in lists. This RFC aims to gather community opinion on the use in lists of images claimed...
Click to read more »is one of the pages for coordinating analysis of views submitted to the RFC on civility enforcement. Also see the coordination discussion page and the...
Click to read more »Moved from WP:VPM. This is an RFC relating to the Related Pages extension. It is currently available in beta. You may test it by enabling Related pages...
Click to read more »candidate has spent most of his time on project pages like RFA, RFB, BRFA, RFC, RFAr, VPP, etc. (evidence on talk page); the only pages the candidate frequents...
Click to read more »become very loud again. This RfC seeks to gain community consensus for this ban. [N.B. The redlink was a controversial RfC he and Abridged started, now...
Click to read more »WP:NAC—S Marshall T/C 09:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Dublin City University RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »employed when all else has failed. Reason for the RFC. There has never been a Requests for comment (RFC) on the Arbitration Committee itself and its processes...
Click to read more »ambivalent about the User RfC mechanism, but with regards to its failure, I think, as one of the admins most active on the User RfC front (and having deleted...
Click to read more »for a second RfC, Talk:Siachen Glacier#RfC: How should the infobox say that the glacier is disputed ? (closure request). The second RfC achieved a consensus...
Click to read more »-]{3}?[0-9X])(?!-|[0-9])→{{ISBN|$1}} On pages in the RFC cat: RFC\s([0-9]{1,4})(?![0-9])→{{IETF RFC|$1}} On pages in the PMID cat: PMID\s([0-9]+)→{{PMID|$1}}...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) I have...
Click to read more »fair bit of time reading the referenced discussions and RFC. It seems clear to me from the RFC that community consensus is now that the sports-specific...
Click to read more »have been tried First RfC Second RfC See also ANI Previous declined RFAR I am here as an uninvolved party from the second RfC on Ryulong and as such...
Click to read more »do not belong here. The RFC of Petri Krohn was improperly deleted by DrKiernan, whom Bishonen had led to believe that the RFC was not properly certified...
Click to read more »page is intended as a preparation for a sitewide RfC about the role of Wikidata on enwiki. Before an RFC can be had, it seems like a good idea to list a...
Click to read more »Science reveals no articles. He also published RFC memos which should not count as "research", of which only RFC 2434 is heavily cited (Google Scholar gives...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker· count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) I've been...
Click to read more »was the subject of a request for comment, started on February 4. In the RFC, a series of blocks were criticized, including an arguably punitive 12-hour...
Click to read more »Comment (RFC) asking for the orange "You have new messages" bar to be restored at least temporarily hit 125 supports. Despite only 29 opposes, the RFC has...
Click to read more »maintain Wikipedia:Requested moves and related pages, taking over from User:RFC bot which has maintained the pages since May. The ability to hide bots in...
Click to read more »case there is an RFC that provides guidance on whether or not the project should have lists of podcast episodes. I hope that an RFC asking this question...
Click to read more »bullet point above?--Rockfang (talk) 23:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC) I think it's an RFC: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Checkuser and oversighter selection. —Jeremy...
Click to read more »May 2017 (UTC) Not that I necessarily agree with this poorly-constructed RfC, but your whole post highlights the core of the problem. Passing NSPORTS...
Click to read more »past. Structure: This RfC is divided into portions, each of which contains a discussion point for the community. The standard RfC structure will be used...
Click to read more »collaboration with many RFC participants. The process of closing this RFC is being discussed at the talk page. Disclaimer: This RFC focuses on stand-alone...
Click to read more »RFC docs: RFC 527, RFC 937 RFC 937, RFC 2032, RFC 2357, RFC 2887, RFC 2961, RFC 3038, RFC 3048, RFC 3095, RFC 3269, RFC 3549, RFC 3684, RFC 3695, RFC...
Click to read more »usually be blacklisted: see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#RfC: Deprecation of fake news / disinformation sites. (non-admin closure) (t...
Click to read more »resulted in an RFC on the structure and content of the article. Further posts are not helpful. Any further discussion can wait until the RFC is concluded...
Click to read more »This RFC has three questions about the article on Assassination of Park Chung Hee, about the tone, the presence of excessive detail, and the number of...
Click to read more »The discussion formerly at this location has been moved to User:Essjay/RFC. It was subsequently deleted, but the deletion was overturned after review...
Click to read more »with respect to the pillars of Wikipedia; support for the "reform of RFA, RFC/U and Wiki processes to deal with admin actions"; knowledge of and support...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) Would...
Click to read more »opposition from the English Wikipedia community. A request for comment (RfC) asking whether the new project should be enabled by default for logged-in...
Click to read more »an RFC. So I really should revert all edits on the RFC to my last version. Ill refrain though. Its a testament to your misunderstanding of how an RFC and...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »The WMF acknowledges that the RFC to disable Gather in beta exists and that this is a serious step from the English Wikimedia Community. We are working...
Click to read more »Unfortunately, the RfC did not attract so many participants, however, I am comfortable with closing it as no consensus. There is clearly a numerical preference...
Click to read more »not do to a mass nomination, as the creator of the MFD agreed for an WP:RFC on these secret pages, it's fairly easy to close this MFD as moot (former-admin...
Click to read more »contribs) smoddy (talk · contribs) Matt_Crypto (talk · contribs) Having begun a RFC against Irate he has continued to vandalise pages and abuse users. While...
Click to read more »the entire content of the article. Comment by initiator of RfC – The purpose of this RfC is to use a straight up-or-down vote to determine the sense...
Click to read more »happens to be defined in an RFC on "voice profiles for internet mail", but there are a lot of definitions in various RFCs. The FQDA article was prod'ed...
Click to read more »a means unto themselves." A response by Newyorkbrad addressed whether an RFC was the right move: "I do not believe this is an appropriate use of the Requests...
Click to read more »delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC) Tallaght RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks confirmedsuspected) DavidYork71 (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta ·...
Click to read more »The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions...
Click to read more »checkusers and oversight appointees while another case opens: TRM, CUOS '16, R&I, RfC ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 29 September 2016 Arbitration report...
Click to read more »that the RFC is out of hand because it has had 287 comments. That is how an RFC is supposed to work. A large number of responses to an RFC is good. That...
Click to read more »of Britannica. Here is a selection of ongoing discussions this week: An RFC regarding A-class article assessments is currently ongoing. The place of...
Click to read more »embarrassment. I see there was an RFC but this surely cannot be what anyone intended. This should be blanked until a properly structured RFC agreeing if/how this will...
Click to read more »The results are now available and certified. The RFC phase is now complete, see Post-election RFCs for a summary of results. Call for candidates (July...
Click to read more »admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies#RFC: Names with diacritics and other non-ASCII letters: Should we permit, require...
Click to read more »RFC brenneman style JJay (talk • contribs • logs) (Make sure you don't confuse JJay with Jayjg, Essjay, or Sj, as happens every once in a while.) I've...
Click to read more »This is a bare-bones RFC that will allow for this discussion and resolution of the numerous conflicts surrounding a series of editors that have edited...
Click to read more »consensus doesn't have to follow the outcome of an RFC to the letter. Its also true that since the RFC I recall closing a number of secondary schools as...
Click to read more »2012 entries Would an admin assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:List of fixed crossings of the Hudson River#Beginning of the Hudson for List of fixed...
Click to read more »particular discussion may fall more in the realm of WP:RFC. Because of this, I will initiate an RFC on Talk:List of sovereign states on the topic. bibliomaniac15...
Click to read more »was redirect to April Fools' Day Request for Comments#List of April Fools' RFCs. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 05:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »The results are now available and certified. The RFC phase is now complete, see Post-election RFCs for a summary of results. Call for candidates (July...
Click to read more »RFC close amended by ProcrastinatingReader and WP:RSP entry updated with that close. Yes, I'm involved, so if somebody wants to revert this close feel...
Click to read more »automatically create a link when you type in or paste an ISBN, PMID, or RFC. [1][2] The link editor in VisualEditor is now a bit wider. It's now the...
Click to read more »contribution. He got a rfc on him earlier: User:Jersey Devil/RFC, but it got deleted due to a technicality: Just to let you know that the RFC against you was...
Click to read more »The results are now available and certified. The RFC phase is now complete, see Post-election RFCs for a summary of results. Call for candidates (July...
Click to read more »"{{Start date}}" template in the the "built=" field of NRHP infoboxes? Previous RFCs suggested case-by-case consideration should be given to application of microformatting;...
Click to read more »believed to be active on 24 July 2013 linked from subpages of Wikipedia:RfC, and recent watchlist notices and SiteNotices. The latter two are in bold...
Click to read more »The results are now available and certified. The RFC phase is now complete, see Post-election RFCs for a summary of results. Call for candidates (July...
Click to read more »LinkedIn Reddit Digg By Wackywace Centralized discussion Ongoing discussions RfC on Username policy: Should the username policy be reworded, to tolerate the...
Click to read more »further attempt to resolute this matter should be re-directed to the ongoing RFC and the current ANI discussion in regards to Tony’s behaviour. Alex ShihTalk...
Click to read more »RfC: Wording of the SOCK policy regarding clean starts and prior blocks Discussion concerning the retitling of the page "Ownership of articles" RFC on...
Click to read more »between RFCs and DOIs is that RFCs are often used in multiple articles. We certainly could impose a requirement that {{Ref RFC}} only be used for RFCs used...
Click to read more »it and marking it as historical. After nearly a week of discussion, the RfC was closed with the consensus that the community would prefer to improve...
Click to read more »Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could...
Click to read more »This RFC was opened in March. At this point it's run for well over 30 days. Editors are unlikely to come to an agreement on what the consensus is. Could...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »RfC about the same, or functionally similar, topic may be launched with-in 90 days of the last RfC (tracked from the end of the RfC), except any RfC which...
Click to read more »revert or strike. The RFC was eventually so much over run by socks that it had to be closed without going forward. In the RFC, after noting my own part...
Click to read more »WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. North America1000 09:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Per the RfC that people so delightful chooses to ignore. And so clearly states that SCHOOLOUTCOMES...
Click to read more »{{RFCecon list}} for WP:RFC/ECON. Ive moved all of RFC/BIO to the templates and Im moving RFC/ECON now. Ill move the rest of the RFC sections to templates...
Click to read more »Mailing Lists to attempt to gain consensus for the discontinuation of RFC/U. Even if RFC/U is discontinued, deletion may not be appropriate, and I would suggest...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) Almost...
Click to read more »(October 22–25) Voting phase (October 25 – November 1) Results Debrief RFC workshop RFC phase October 2024 Debrief July 2025 → Debrief Please leave any comments...
Click to read more »and now they are abused for the political agenda of a small group." Three RFCs were conducted March 1–8. In the largest 146 (68%) out of 215 editors voted...
Click to read more »a new section. The administrators who closed May's Request for Comment (RfC) on Pending Changes determined that it should be implemented around the end...
Click to read more »unreferenced articles? RFC: Shall a bot "fix" heading levels? RFC: How to categorize articles that have categories named after them? RFC: Is there a consensus...
Click to read more »block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) EastWestern (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI ·...
Click to read more »than I thought! WormTT(talk) 15:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Shortcuts WP:RFC/ARSWP:RFC/ARS WP:DISCUSS_ARSWP:DISCUSS_ARS Centralized discussion Village pumps...
Click to read more »of the election is to ensure high quality appointees. The purpose of this RFC is to consider the Arbitration Committee's request for community input. Checkuser...
Click to read more »and by the terms of this RfC, another RfC must be held to determine the criteria for granting the new permission. This RfC does not authorize the creation...
Click to read more »talking here about a RFC/U page, and if the community thinks there are no issues with the user, there will be consensus at the page that RFC/U is not necessary...
Click to read more »27#Windy Corner, followed by RFC Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man#RfC: Proposed merge to Snaefell Mountain Course The RFC was never concluded, as far as...
Click to read more »page. He is also extremely organized and humble. Sam keeps an unofficial RfC on himself open so users may leave constructive criticism. As a member of...
Click to read more »re-consideration of a previous debate (such as a "no consensus" result on an RFC, AFD or CFD), it is similarly inappropriate to send a disproportionate number...
Click to read more »cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) I believe...
Click to read more »Moved from Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § RFC: Should grey literature from advocacy groups and other similar orgs always be considered WP:SPS...
Click to read more »an RFC to create a new page-patrolling user group and to remove the right to patrol from all other user groups except admins and higher. This RFC will...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »to admins - There has been a request (on the talk page to preserve this RfC even after the deadline so it may be used as evidence against the submitter...
Click to read more »27#Windy Corner, followed by RFC Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man#RfC: Proposed merge to Snaefell Mountain Course The RFC was never concluded, as far as...
Click to read more »Borders -> Broughton RFC Eyemouth RFC Gala YM RFC Hawick YM RFC St Boswells RFC 5 Template:Rugby union in Edinburgh -> Edinburgh BATs RFC Edinburgh University...
Click to read more »community consensus in a 2017 RfC to have a "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication". This RfC became a landmark decision...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »--Michael Snow 05:11, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete. Speedy Delete. Spurious RfC that was never properly certified Whig 07:16, 23 May 2005 (UTC) Keep. It...
Click to read more »Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could...
Click to read more »the right venue to sort this out and even the nominator now agrees that WP:RFC is more appropriate. Schwede66 20:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »original RFC were done in bad faith. The alteration makes it appear that my consideration of the RFC as a joke is directed at the amended RFC. I have repeatedly...
Click to read more »keep. This close is explicitly without prejudice to renomination if the RFC removes the relevant criterion from WP:PORNBIO. (non-admin closure) Tim Song...
Click to read more »Reassessment" section of the announcements on the project's main page, and add the rfc=yes parameter to the article's {{D&D}} template, to help attract other users...
Click to read more »full-blown request of banning but has fizzled into something resembling an RFC. This sort of thing in user space wouldn't be bothersome she was working...
Click to read more »27#Windy Corner, followed by RFC Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man#RfC: Proposed merge to Snaefell Mountain Course The RFC was never concluded, as far as...
Click to read more »27#Windy Corner, followed by RFC Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man#RfC: Proposed merge to Snaefell Mountain Course The RFC was never concluded, as far as...
Click to read more »understand! Much the same as Option A, but the loud version. File multiple AN/ANI/RFC/ArbCom proceedings. Tag articles for NPOV or whatever else springs to mind...
Click to read more »this page. The result was keep. Valid disambiguation page per WP:DAB. The RfC, which established the primary redirect of Pahonia to coat of arms of Lithuania...
Click to read more »pending the outcome of a potentially open-ended RFC. But the page may be renominated should the RFC (or indeed any editor) conclude that it is appropriate...
Click to read more »So, the ECP RfC closed with the guaranteed to be messy requirement of posting every protection to AN. Looking at User:MusikBot/ECPMonitor/Report, the...
Click to read more »Arbitration Committee has opened an RFC on the subject of how to resolve content disputes. Another community-wide RFC was opened this week on the subject...
Click to read more »Poll". (For more information, see the Public or Secret Voting section of the RFC.) The SecurePoll facility was tested earlier this year and was recently used...
Click to read more »contribs · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · socks · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)...
Click to read more »scientific realism article was declined, with arbitrators suggesting an RFC as an alternative solution. There are no requests outstanding. The Ban Appeals...
Click to read more »an WP:RFC was filled against adminstrator User:Kelly Martin over the issue of her deletion of Userboxes. While Kelly has been told of this RFC, I believe...
Click to read more »Since the 2013 RfC on Wikidata Phase 2, using Wikidata in infoboxes has gone from the concept stage to more extensive mainspace experimental implementations...
Click to read more »This RfC establishes Fox News's marginal reliability not through an absence of consensus as to reliability (as determined in the July 2020 RfC) but instead...
Click to read more »believed to be active on 31 July 2013 linked from subpages of Wikipedia:RfC, and recent watchlist notices and SiteNotices. The latter two are in bold...
Click to read more »overview: Replace magic links with templates per RfC Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): RfC Edit period(s): Daily Estimated number of pages...
Click to read more »endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views. RFC/U does not accept "opposes" or "anti-endorsements"; the fact that you do...
Click to read more »start rolling back this process. And WP:RFC/USER is a good place to start. Virtually no one is happy with the user RFC process as it currently stands. Here...
Click to read more »27#Windy Corner, followed by RFC Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man#RfC: Proposed merge to Snaefell Mountain Course The RFC was never concluded, as far as...
Click to read more »and Floquenbeam requested to be desysopped. These actions resulted in an RfC asking whether WJBScribe and Floquenbeam's actions would be considered "under...
Click to read more »University has an RFC regarding the university's relationship with President Trump; see discussion Is Genesis History? has an RFC regarding acceptability...
Click to read more »· auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · identified · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (r · p · f · c) Reason for requesting...
Click to read more »deleted then it might be worth reopening another RFC on it but as it stands keep pretty much per the rfc and above. –Davey2010Talk 01:20, 27 September 2018...
Click to read more »mass-AFD closed as "keep (snow close)" with a suggestion that a follow-up RFC was forthcoming: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket...
Click to read more »19 December 2014 (UTC) Template:RFC boilerplate 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:RFC boilerplate 2 (talk · history · transclusions ·...
Click to read more »in authoritative sources as National Information Assurance Glossary, or RFC 2828 is not covered (at no level or in same cases at very start class level)...
Click to read more »deleted then it might be worth reopening another RFC on it but as it stands keep pretty much per the rfc and above. –Davey2010Talk 01:20, 27 September 2018...
Click to read more »deleted then it might be worth reopening another RFC on it but as it stands keep pretty much per the rfc and above. –Davey2010Talk 01:20, 27 September 2018...
Click to read more »outside of RfC/U, or for imposing blocks, bans or binding disciplinary measures for actions taken outside of RfC/U. Keep in mind that RfC/U is a non-binding...
Click to read more »block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) M.K (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) Lysy (talk ·...
Click to read more »27#Windy Corner, followed by RFC Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man#RfC: Proposed merge to Snaefell Mountain Course The RFC was never concluded, as far as...
Click to read more »worthy of articles in the future. This page is not currently maintained. RFC – This Request for comments link points to the Math, Science, and Technology...
Click to read more »noticeboard itself. It would work like RFC, because the central location will allow for more editors to see the dispute as does RFC, with editors welcome to comment...
Click to read more »smells like it comes from a laundry pile. Timing is close enough to the RFC opening to raise eyebrows. DurovaCharge! 16:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC) Just FYI...
Click to read more »I should add that had this been an "actual" RFC it would have been deleted a long time ago per RFC policy. >Radiant< 08:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC) A seven-month...
Click to read more »The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions...
Click to read more »system, the community agrees that conversation should be need-directed. RfC is an appropriate avenue for recommending major change, including in leadership...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Maybe you could put a mock-up proposal on the talk page of this RFC? (Maybe WPMED has gone so moribund that no one cares ... ) SandyGeorgia (Talk)...
Click to read more »does not happen within 48 hours of the listing of this dispute page at WP:RFC (which was: 20:34, 10 August 2005 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current...
Click to read more »the dispute is the Media Viewer request for comments (RfC), and the actions that followed the RfC. Components proposed here may be general principles of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of...
Click to read more »Dave, Felix: Please take a look at the proposed RFC below. If you think that I got anything wrong, or if there is anything else commenting editors should...
Click to read more »initiated the original Infoboxes case request. The RFC drew immediate protests from music editors. The RFC should be in a neutral area, not on the pages of...
Click to read more »It has been restored because its content may be useful—there is an ongoing RFC on this subject at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Intelligent Design.)...
Click to read more »assisted: Automatic Programming language(s): PHP Source code available: User:RFC bot/goodarticles.php Function overview: Maintenance of the good article nominations...
Click to read more »Edit to old RFC Edit to old RFC again Edit to old RFC third time Erase edit of a User talk page Reporting of Weyes to Admin noticeboard RFC of Raul654...
Click to read more »result was keep. Without prejudice to any consensus to merge this from the RFC at Talk:The Legend of Korra. T. Canens (talk) 16:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »rubber-stamping that RFC. Anomie⚔ 22:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Approved. As mentioned this is mostly a rubber-stamp as there still needs to be a follow-up RFC, but I don't...
Click to read more »right into the middle of COVID-19, because even with an RFC, the behavior continued as soon as the RFC closed. For now, no one is editing drug prices anyway...
Click to read more »having or not having a name in basic ASCII script. So for those cases this RfC should not be used as justification for the removal or addition of such names...
Click to read more »the inclusion criteria, Talk:List of political parties in Italy/Archive 3#RFC on Regional Criterion, Talk:List of political parties in Italy/Archive 3#Criteria...
Click to read more »you can see there are differing views on whether it belongs in the lead. This RfC is to get broader input. Chopcha (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »promotional names should be gently encouraged to change names, and sent to RFC/N if necessary to obtain a name change if the community (not one or two editors)...
Click to read more »should be made to this discussion. unresolved. editors can seek arbitration, rfc/u, or bring the matter up at any appropriate forum. --RegentsPark (talk)...
Click to read more »restrictive IPBE RFC (February 2016) Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption#Proposals for RfC (February-March 2016) Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption#RfC: Grant exemptions...
Click to read more »incivility? Should civility be "enforced" and if so, how? The first phase of this RFC is now concluded. It consisted of position statements and open discussion...
Click to read more »according to established policy for user RFCs. Because of this, the RFC has never appeared on the user RFC candidate list, and consequently has not been...
Click to read more »should be the focus. The editor will reform the conduct outlined in this RfC. The editor will agree to provide high-quality sources whenever s/he adds...
Click to read more »repeating myself, see my closure of The Economist RfC, which unfolded substantially identically to this RfC, for the explanation. —Compassionate727 (T·C)...
Click to read more »that the discussion continue on the talk page, perhaps in the form of an RFC? henrik•talk 10:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Chronology of diplomatic recognitions...
Click to read more »least one review to address sources before a candidate can be promoted. This RfC proposes a new, featured quality review process: featured quality source...
Click to read more »"binding RFC" process is content RFCs, which aren't what we seem to be talking about here. Content RFCs aren't binding because of being RFCs, they're...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: The RfC this was based on (WP:VPPR#RFC: Citation Style 1 parameter naming convention has been closed...
Click to read more »deleted then it might be worth reopening another RFC on it but as it stands keep pretty much per the rfc and above. –Davey2010Talk 01:20, 27 September 2018...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Muddy York RFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »has been an RFC which said that MFD discussions may sometimes be relisted, so if there is a view that consensus has changed, is a new RFC warranted? Should...
Click to read more »believe that this RFC was not brought for good reason, other than to subdue my efforts to improve article quality; I suspect this RFC was primarily created...
Click to read more »Completed - (Initiated 1645 days ago on 14 February 2022) Note: Rfc header removed by Legobot 16 March. Although quiescent for some time, this may have...
Click to read more »RFC that describes why it isn't suitable for the Internet. A GScholar search turns up a slew of documents, almost all written by M. Banan (the RFC's author)...
Click to read more »an official RfC page, I just copied and pasted the text. I don't know if it's considered important to have a record of the history of an RfC (the way we...
Click to read more »(UTC) Everyone associated with this RFC was banned by the sysops acting in bad faith. It's no longer a relevant RFC, even though the article was deleted...
Click to read more »WT:COI. There are good reasons why closers don't usually sign up until an RfC is over, but I'd prefer to have closers for this one sooner rather than later...
Click to read more »on the comments in the discussion section, and the rest per WP:IAR. This RFC is a confusing way of proposing that we change policy to overturn the result...
Click to read more »opinion (WP:3O), conflicts of interest (WP:COIN), request for comment (WP:RFC), fringe theories (WP:FTN), biographies of living persons (WP:BLPN), original...
Click to read more »