As of 2025, IP edits are no longer made, see Wikipedia:Temporary accounts. As of 2005, edits are no longer reattributed. However, you may wish to consider...
Click to read more »the context I wouldn't be surprised if it was a developer testing the reattribution of edits. The page duplicates User talk:70.232.185.231 (that of its...
Click to read more »deletions, encyclopedia and free. Lawsuit threatened to achieve image reattribution: On the Commons Village pump, User:WMF Legal advised that due to "potential...
Click to read more »either of those things. This page is for username changes only, not reattribution of edits. — Dan | talk 19:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC) Fair enough. It's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2022 December 30 Misgendering Greta Thunberg Reattribution of IP to account Where to start a discussion on whether an editor's...
Click to read more »otherwise stated. 2) User:COFS must choose a new user name, request reattribution of previous edits to this new name, and maintain links between the two...
Click to read more »usernames. Stifle (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC) More specifically, the reattribution of IP edits to a username (and possibly from an old username to a new...
Click to read more »If the user wishes to change usernames, the proper process for the reattribution of edits is described at Wikipedia:Changing username. Thanks! Flcelloguy...
Click to read more »comment in between. This, however, demonstrated that there was no comment-reattribution going on in the original diff after all, so I reverted myself. (I've...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Abstain: 2) User:COFS must choose a new user name, request reattribution of previous edits to this new name, and maintain links between the two...
Click to read more »under them is actual reattribution, which requires developer access to manipulate the servers directly. There is no reattribution tool made available to...
Click to read more »2004 (UTC) (Sorry, I hope these two edits are sufficient to allow the reattribution even though I did them in the wrong order. To be clear, "Patrick D"...
Click to read more »--KFP (talk | contribs) 00:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Well actually, reattribution is possible...but the service was suspended some time ago. See Wikipedia:Changing...
Click to read more »very much! Pasquale (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Unfortunately, reattribution is no longer performed. You may want to make a null edit with an edit...
Click to read more »re-attribute, but I've seen at least one example of a rename where reattribution never happened, so I would keep a watch on it for a while and come back...
Click to read more »go along with the advice above. But it's strange, because some large reattributions go through very swiftly. I guess it just depends what's in the queue...
Click to read more »fixed: citations sitting adrift of genuine material, quotations needing reattribution, and glosses trimmed back to what the sources state. This was among...
Click to read more »usurpation, because AFAIK the GFDL was the only impediment behind the reattribution of these edits. I'd make sure of this with a test account beforehand...
Click to read more »You can post a link to them from your user page while you wait for reattribution by a developer. Mgm|(talk) 08:19, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC) Yeah, that's what...
Click to read more »How. can I edit plz help 😥😥😥😥 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moiidthg (talk • contribs) 14:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC) @Moiidthg: You are doing it...
Click to read more »appreciate the reattribution change of my original Dec.13 posting if you can do it. Thank You. Blackburn2000 (talk) Bureaucrat note: Full reattribution can take...
Click to read more »is ready to pass any chemical expertise. Another, less common way is reattribution. If the work of art is really very fit to be modified, but it is signed...
Click to read more »is currently 2,823,885."; it often gets high during server problems. Reattribution of edits through a rename is done via the job queue, so one possiblity...
Click to read more »(UTC) To be fair, I wonder if recreating lucasbfr is what broke the reattribution process (if someone knows how to have a dev actually look at it and...
Click to read more »[12] but is over a year old and unused. Also, with almost 25K edits reättribution could take a little longer than most renamings. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~...
Click to read more »220.224.11. Somesh. 24.65.177.33 (but you can call me 24) requests reattribution of "Depressant" to Denni Yep, that'd be me. Denni 01:05, 2004 Feb 17...
Click to read more »Hello! I am trying to connect Account en:User:Gampe to my Global account, but I have not succeeded. Could somebody tell me, what is wrong? Thank you! ...
Click to read more »(fixing the latest update). Can someone please provide the link to the reattribution page; I can't remember the link. Mgm|(talk) 21:44, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »On Greta Thunberg's wikipedia page, she/her pronouns are used to describe them the entirety of the page. However, they use they/them pronouns, and there...
Click to read more »brushwork. I am slightly involved having supplied further context to the reattribution after it was definitively altered. The review of the attribution was...
Click to read more »below) is my read too: after the 2016 firing of staff, deletion or reattribution of old articles, and mixing of opinion in with other 'reporting', the...
Click to read more »fixed: citations sitting adrift of genuine material, quotations needing reattribution, and glosses trimmed back to what the sources state. This was among...
Click to read more »