This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
rusdialog.ru topwar.ru ukraina.ru veteransnewsnow.com Shortcut WP:RSSMWP:RSSM Reputable student media outlets, such as The Harvard Crimson, are considered...
Click to read more »Pennsylvania for the club to be independently notable, especially in light of WP:RSSM. In the absence of reliable sources independent of both Penn and the club...
Click to read more »Comment. Separately, student-run media are considered WP:RS (specifically WP:RSSM) if editorially independent in content, which Niner Times appears to be via...
Click to read more »arguments against keeping substantially stronger. The precise wording of RSSM is somewhat tangential; it is a long-established principle that newspapers...
Click to read more »Student Life. Retrieved 8 May 2021. The Student Life is reliable per WP:RSSM but a little borderline for notability purposes, but the others certainly...
Click to read more »and is covered in detail by the college newspaper, e.g. [1], but per WP:RSSM, given their local audience, student media may be challenged or discounted...
Click to read more »The current sources consist of deadlinks to WP:PRIMARY, WP:BLOG, and WP:RSSM sources. Searching on Google, Google News, Google News Archive, Google Books...
Click to read more »contribute to WP:NBUILDING are sourced to a student newspaper, which per WP:RSSM cannot contribute to notability. Triptothecottage (talk) 00:43, 21 June 2024...
Click to read more »WP:NOTNEO, WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Sourcing is primarily student publications (see WP:RSSM). This belongs in Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. Contested PROD. Dclemens1971...
Click to read more »Claremont Colleges' newspaper, and the team seems fairly successful, but WP:RSSM states a topic which can be sourced almost exclusively to student media,...
Click to read more »consist of a student newspaper article that's mostly an interview (see also WP:RSSM); a source with a couple of paragraphs that again has a significant amount...
Click to read more »and some student media that doesn't count toward notability based on WP:RSSM. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »4: a blog by Penn State students. Does not demonstrate notability per WP:RSSM: student media does not contribute to notability for topics related to home...
Click to read more »16:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Coverage limited to WP:RSSM; not finding anything else. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:52, 16 September 2024...
Click to read more »significant coverage, though I'm not sure if it is reputable enough to pass WP:RSSM. Therefore, with two sources counting towards WP:NBAND criteria 1 and two...
Click to read more »per WP:UNIGUIDE and probably aren't particularly reliable for this per WP:RSSM. Beyond that, the most reputable source is from The Independent, which only...
Click to read more »student newspaper, a journal article, and a newspaper article. Quoted from WP:RSSM: A topic which can be sourced exclusively to student media, with no evidence...
Click to read more »[2], [3]. Profiles/bios from his schools' websites or student pubs (WP:RSSM): [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. His own companies' websites: [9], [10], [11]....
Click to read more »enough to push it over the line. Jo7hs2 (talk) 22:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC) WP:RSSM notes that student media (such as the Rice Thresher and various HerCampus...
Click to read more »a student newspaper, so it would be a weak source to show notability (WP:RSSM). The only material in the RTS interview (that is not an answer by Zand):...
Click to read more »it is allowed by policy. The Hoya I believe is considered an RS under the RSSM policy; namely, a reliable student media that is here reporting on its own...
Click to read more »and therefore very much a reliable source for Yale-related topics per WP:RSSM, and that it appears likely someone with a conflict of interest is trying...
Click to read more »04:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC) That would not, since it's a student paper; per WP:RSSM, student media can be considered as reliable to confirm information but not...
Click to read more »largely sourced to student media, professional sources are preferred per WP:RSSM. It’s also largely sourced to Mashable, which is “yellow” on WP:RSP. The...
Click to read more »to be a student publication which no longer exists so a weak source (WP:RSSM), the WSJ is an op-ed so also a weak source, The Telegraph is a brief mention...
Click to read more »newspaper of Otago University. ―Panamitsu (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC) WP:RSSM applies here: given their local audience and lack of independence from their...
Click to read more »that have been given here. Student newspapers are acceptable sources, WP:RSSM only states that notability doesn't apply when used for "home institutions"...
Click to read more »that have been given here. Student newspapers are acceptable sources, WP:RSSM only states that notability doesn't apply when used for "home institutions"...
Click to read more »their about page, see WP:STUDENTMEDIA I think the appropriate policy is WP:RSSM, which notes, "They can sometimes be considered reliable on other topics"...
Click to read more »WP:GNG-point, it doesn't say much about the article subject. The Daily Bruin (WP:RSSM) is little more than a passing mention. The Britannica videos doesn't help...
Click to read more »the subject's alma mater and thus disqualified toward notability per WP:RSSM. Sources 10-12 are WP:INTERVIEWS and thus disqualified toward notability...
Click to read more »Purdue? Guninvalid (talk) 18:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC) Hi @Guninvalid see WP:RSSM about student media outlets. Generally they do not help with establishing...
Click to read more »Student Life. Retrieved 8 May 2021. The Student Life is reliable per WP:RSSM but a little borderline for notability purposes, but the others certainly...
Click to read more »that have been given here. Student newspapers are acceptable sources, WP:RSSM only states that notability doesn't apply when used for "home institutions"...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG as per WP:RSSM. TLA (talk) 03:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »reputably published". Furthermore student newspapers do count for WP:RS, see WP:RSSM and the linked section. We may have a personal view about this (which I probably...
Click to read more »significant of the viral videos of the 2000s. And as for StudyBreaks, see WP:RSSM: "...They can sometimes be considered reliable on other topics, although...
Click to read more »that have been given here. Student newspapers are acceptable sources, WP:RSSM only states that notability doesn't apply when used for "home institutions"...
Click to read more »that have been given here. Student newspapers are acceptable sources, WP:RSSM only states that notability doesn't apply when used for "home institutions"...
Click to read more »significant coverage, though I'm not sure if it is reputable enough to pass WP:RSSM. Therefore, with two sources counting towards WP:NBAND criteria 1 and two...
Click to read more »that have been given here. Student newspapers are acceptable sources, WP:RSSM only states that notability doesn't apply when used for "home institutions"...
Click to read more »page that there is "a lot more here than WP:RSSM". Make your argument on other grounds, because WP:RSSM/student media is not getting much traction here...
Click to read more »Bri (talk) 05:46, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Can be considered WP:N fail per WP:RSSM though. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Ars Technica...
Click to read more »Financial Center April 2025.jpg File:HermanHoferHegner portrait19361944.tif File:RSSM State Prize.png File:Yusupha Ngum and the Affia Band Healesville Music Festival...
Click to read more »that have been given here. Student newspapers are acceptable sources, WP:RSSM only states that notability doesn't apply when used for "home institutions"...
Click to read more »Pesticide1110 (talk) 11:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC) 3 may or may not be ok per WP:RSSM, I'm sceptical that 6 is a BLP-good source [2], 8 is probably ok [3]. Gråbergs...
Click to read more »@PetraMagna For use of Stanford Daily to establish notability - I disagree per WP:RSSM. But even then it is a presumption of notability, not a guarantee. ScreenRant...
Click to read more »Huppé is a student newspaper and does not contribute to notability per WP:RSSM. They self-describe as being produced by "amateurice·x·s de journalisme"...
Click to read more »supporting. There are a few things I'd note in support of it meeting the WP:RSSM reputable student media standard. First, I think it's fairly self-evident...
Click to read more »to the extent that they are about their school and local community per WP:RSSM, but they seem a lot weaker when used to show notability compared to more...
Click to read more »the teams playing Student newspaper - does not contribute to notability WP:RSSM Only mention is "Leaders on the Bengal defense includ�ing inside linebacker...
Click to read more »Pesticide1110 (talk) 11:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC) 3 may or may not be ok per WP:RSSM, I'm sceptical that 6 is a BLP-good source [24], 8 is probably ok [25]. Gråbergs...
Click to read more »student newspaper, a journal article, and a newspaper article. Quoted from WP:RSSM: A topic which can be sourced exclusively to student media, with no evidence...
Click to read more »to the extent that they are about their school and local community per WP:RSSM, but they seem a lot weaker when used to show notability compared to more...
Click to read more »and is covered in detail by the college newspaper, e.g. [62], but per WP:RSSM, given their local audience, student media may be challenged or discounted...
Click to read more »Claremont Colleges' newspaper, and the team seems fairly successful, but WP:RSSM states a topic which can be sourced almost exclusively to student media,...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC) @Jo-Jo Eumerus: I'd argue yes—per WP:RSSM (it seems to be reliable for this topic) and the fact that it's one of three...
Click to read more »Student Life. Retrieved 8 May 2021. The Student Life is reliable per WP:RSSM but a little borderline for notability purposes, but the others certainly...
Click to read more »their about page, see WP:STUDENTMEDIA I think the appropriate policy is WP:RSSM, which notes, "They can sometimes be considered reliable on other topics"...
Click to read more »The current sources consist of deadlinks to WP:PRIMARY, WP:BLOG, and WP:RSSM sources. Searching on Google, Google News, Google News Archive, Google Books...
Click to read more »and some student media that doesn't count toward notability based on WP:RSSM. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »and therefore very much a reliable source for Yale-related topics per WP:RSSM, and that it appears likely someone with a conflict of interest is trying...
Click to read more »Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Cadrele de Partid și Sovietice din RASSM și RSSM ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) CADserver ? — ? 1 1 1.000...
Click to read more »Student Life. Retrieved 8 May 2021. The Student Life is reliable per WP:RSSM but a little borderline for notability purposes, but the others certainly...
Click to read more »significant of the viral videos of the 2000s. And as for StudyBreaks, see WP:RSSM: "...They can sometimes be considered reliable on other topics, although...
Click to read more »the teams playing Student newspaper - does not contribute to notability WP:RSSM Only mention is "Leaders on the Bengal defense includ�ing inside linebacker...
Click to read more »sources on TWL considered reliable? Many of the sources there seem to be WP:RSSM (and I won't repeat that mistake again lol). Wetrorave (talk) 16:59, 13 February...
Click to read more »that have been given here. Student newspapers are acceptable sources, WP:RSSM only states that notability doesn't apply when used for "home institutions"...
Click to read more »Regarding The Student Life, the main area of interpretation left after the WP:RSSM guidance is whether or not it can be considered an example of a "reputable...
Click to read more »discussion anywhere? JoelleJay (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC) See WP:RSSM BilledMammal (talk) 19:48, 8 January 2022 (UTC) Thank you, I didn't think...
Click to read more »terms of how we classify it. --Jayron32 16:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC) See WP:RSSM, and it seems within reason that the Howard paper is reliable for a Howard...
Click to read more »vast majority of these are WP:PRIMARYSOURCES and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in WP:RSSM and other outlets. There is very little evidence that Heisner was discussed...
Click to read more »(UTC) Don't know if this is Icewhiz or not but the account was quoting WP:RSSM, using abbreviations, day after they created their account [510]. On the...
Click to read more »discovery that CanCulture is a student source (missed that beforehand) per WP:RSSM. That makes what would be 3 SIGCOV reliable sources into 2, which isn't really...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Agree that something like that should have better sources per WP:RSSM. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 23:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC) I should add a bit...
Click to read more »wikilink is. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:01, 27 June 2021 (UTC) TipsyElephant, WP:RSSM? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC) I have come across a...
Click to read more »Per WP:RSSM, student media does not contribute to notability for topics related to home institutions. why not? deadlink, but moot per WP:RSSM. ✘ No The...
Click to read more »Unclear, appears to be written closely with Negative XP. Student newspaper, WP:RSSM. Also labeled an opinion piece. ✘ No https://cavedwellermusic...
Click to read more »Unclear, appears to be written closely with Negative XP. Student newspaper, WP:RSSM. Also labeled an opinion piece. ✘ No https://cavedwellermusic...
Click to read more »WP:NOTNEO, WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Sourcing is primarily student publications (see WP:RSSM). This belongs in Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. Contested PROD. Dclemens1971...
Click to read more »Toronto Star WP:TRIVIALMENTION ✘ No Hypothetical Emory Wheel mentions Per WP:RSSM, student media is not reliable for establishing the notability of people/entities...
Click to read more »notability (c.f. WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:RECENTISM). See WP:RSSM for considerations about using student newspapers. Addendum: and as pointed...
Click to read more »Per WP:RSSM, student media does not contribute to notability for topics related to home institutions. why not? deadlink, but moot per WP:RSSM. ✘ No The...
Click to read more »arguments against keeping substantially stronger. The precise wording of RSSM is somewhat tangential; it is a long-established principle that newspapers...
Click to read more »Toronto Star WP:TRIVIALMENTION ✘ No Hypothetical Emory Wheel mentions Per WP:RSSM, student media is not reliable for establishing the notability of people/entities...
Click to read more »it is allowed by policy. The Hoya I believe is considered an RS under the RSSM policy; namely, a reliable student media that is here reporting on its own...
Click to read more »paper and they are rarely RSes for things away from their community. See WP:RSSM I understand why you think this way. I actually remember dissenting on this...
Click to read more »subject to editorial review. ~ While reliable about home institutions, per WP:RSSM, student media may be discounted during notability discussions about topics...
Click to read more »variabilis Draparnaud -- wsp•jstorP•efloras•gs•gb•g Abida variabilis polita Rssm -- wsp•jstorP•efloras•gs•gb•g Abida vasconica -- wsp•jstorP•efloras•gs•gb•g...
Click to read more »ntern/2015-summer-lantern.pdf University paper usually unreliable per WP:RSSM ✘ No https://www.insightonbusiness.com/archives/producing-a-silver-scree...
Click to read more »Comment. Separately, student-run media are considered WP:RS (specifically WP:RSSM) if editorially independent in content, which Niner Times appears to be via...
Click to read more »subject to editorial review. ~ While reliable about home institutions, per WP:RSSM, student media may be discounted during notability discussions about topics...
Click to read more »supporting. There are a few things I'd note in support of it meeting the WP:RSSM reputable student media standard. First, I think it's fairly self-evident...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC) @Jo-Jo Eumerus: I'd argue yes—per WP:RSSM (it seems to be reliable for this topic) and the fact that it's one of three...
Click to read more »not be used for verifying controversial statements The New University WP:RSSM ComicBook.com Reliablity unclear – Mashable – WP:MASHABLE – — Game Rant (ditto)...
Click to read more »sources on TWL considered reliable? Many of the sources there seem to be WP:RSSM (and I won't repeat that mistake again lol). Wetrorave (talk) 16:59, 13 February...
Click to read more »Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC) Since noone has mentioned WP:RSSM yet, I'll do that. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC) I would...
Click to read more »Regarding The Student Life, the main area of interpretation left after the WP:RSSM guidance is whether or not it can be considered an example of a "reputable...
Click to read more »student media, which has a mixed reputation for reliability here on WP (see WP:RSSM) wizzito | say hello! 21:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC) Additionally, a lot of student...
Click to read more »ntern/2015-summer-lantern.pdf University paper usually unreliable per WP:RSSM ✘ No https://www.insightonbusiness.com/archives/producing-a-silver-scree...
Click to read more »is my gamer of the year". The Spectator. Retrieved October 26, 2025. ~ WP:RSSM ~ Maybe L0ka (January 8, 2025). "Un streamer joue à un jeu vidéo d'horreur...
Click to read more »contribute to WP:NBUILDING are sourced to a student newspaper, which per WP:RSSM cannot contribute to notability. Triptothecottage (talk) 00:43, 21 June 2024...
Click to read more »4: a blog by Penn State students. Does not demonstrate notability per WP:RSSM: student media does not contribute to notability for topics related to home...
Click to read more »Bri (talk) 05:46, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Can be considered WP:N fail per WP:RSSM though. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Ars Technica...
Click to read more »newspaper of Otago University. ―Panamitsu (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC) WP:RSSM applies here: given their local audience and lack of independence from their...
Click to read more »reputably published". Furthermore student newspapers do count for WP:RS, see WP:RSSM and the linked section. We may have a personal view about this (which I probably...
Click to read more »student-run, student-funded newspaper at the University of California. See WP:RSSM. If you want to cite it for something like "The Lord of the Rings” trilogy...
Click to read more »enough to push it over the line. Jo7hs2 (talk) 22:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC) WP:RSSM notes that student media (such as the Rice Thresher and various HerCampus...
Click to read more »to be a student publication which no longer exists so a weak source (WP:RSSM), the WSJ is an op-ed so also a weak source, The Telegraph is a brief mention...
Click to read more »largely sourced to student media, professional sources are preferred per WP:RSSM. It’s also largely sourced to Mashable, which is “yellow” on WP:RSP. The...
Click to read more »Huppé is a student newspaper and does not contribute to notability per WP:RSSM. They self-describe as being produced by "amateurice·x·s de journalisme"...
Click to read more »Christ#USC "apology". TarnishedPathtalk 09:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC) WP:RSSM has a little guidance. WP-article at Daily Trojan. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)...
Click to read more »16:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Coverage limited to WP:RSSM; not finding anything else. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:52, 16 September 2024...
Click to read more »by Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka), first c. 40s. [3], De Montfort University WP:RSSM. It's local, but local is not nothing. I brought up the [4] by Manchester...
Click to read more »vast majority of these are WP:PRIMARYSOURCES and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in WP:RSSM and other outlets. There is very little evidence that Heisner was discussed...
Click to read more »04:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC) That would not, since it's a student paper; per WP:RSSM, student media can be considered as reliable to confirm information but not...
Click to read more »that have been given here. Student newspapers are acceptable sources, WP:RSSM only states that notability doesn't apply when used for "home institutions"...
Click to read more »proven true, they just need RS to verify that they exist. Student media WP:RSSM are reliable for their communities and this story was covered by a national...
Click to read more »section to maintain. Agnieszka653 (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2025 (UTC) WP:RSSM like The State Press is not good enough for serious BLP-stuff. Science journals...
Click to read more »page.) Despite its depth, the school paper doesn't qualify for GNG under WP:RSSM. I don't want to relitigate the AfD though, I just thought it appeared that...
Click to read more »Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka), first c. 40s. [61], De Montfort University WP:RSSM. It's local, but local is not nothing. I brought up the [62] by Manchester...
Click to read more »the sniff test for student media being treated as a reliable source per WP:RSSM and should not be simply tossed for being student media. Much of the editing...
Click to read more »allegations and events. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC) Per WP:RSSM, the Columbia Chronicle refs may not be the best in the BLP-crime context...
Click to read more »a student newspaper, so it would be a weak source to show notability (WP:RSSM). The only material in the RTS interview (that is not an answer by Zand):...
Click to read more »discovery that CanCulture is a student source (missed that beforehand) per WP:RSSM. That makes what would be 3 SIGCOV reliable sources into 2, which isn't really...
Click to read more »WP:GNG-point, it doesn't say much about the article subject. The Daily Bruin (WP:RSSM) is little more than a passing mention. The Britannica videos doesn't help...
Click to read more »consist of a student newspaper article that's mostly an interview (see also WP:RSSM); a source with a couple of paragraphs that again has a significant amount...
Click to read more »@PetraMagna For use of Stanford Daily to establish notability - I disagree per WP:RSSM. But even then it is a presumption of notability, not a guarantee. ScreenRant...
Click to read more »per WP:UNIGUIDE and probably aren't particularly reliable for this per WP:RSSM. Beyond that, the most reputable source is from The Independent, which only...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG as per WP:RSSM. TLA (talk) 03:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »[34], [35]. Profiles/bios from his schools' websites or student pubs (WP:RSSM): [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]. His own companies' websites: [41], [42],...
Click to read more »the subject's alma mater and thus disqualified toward notability per WP:RSSM. Sources 10-12 are WP:INTERVIEWS and thus disqualified toward notability...
Click to read more »paper and they are rarely RSes for things away from their community. See WP:RSSM I understand why you think this way. I actually remember dissenting on this...
Click to read more »page.) Despite its depth, the school paper doesn't qualify for GNG under WP:RSSM. I don't want to relitigate the AfD though, I just thought it appeared that...
Click to read more »