This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
(or use the |pmc= parameter in the closing template). Shortcut WP:RMECWP:RMEC In general, move discussions should remain open for at least seven days (168...
Click to read more »(168 hours) but can be withdrawn under specific circumstances as per WP:RMEC. Alternatively, the opener of a discussion can close it only if unanimous...
Click to read more »during an active AfD discussion. It's already an accepted practice in WP:RMEC; Furthermore, any editor may end such a move request with a procedural close:...
Click to read more »proposals after they have received support from other editors". The cited WP:RMEC is merely an essay, and another page was also cited; the latter page links...
Click to read more »of forming a local consensus here. A disambiguation page can include WP:RMEC, WP:DRV#Speedy closes, and WP:GAFAIL. In GA-land, speedy closes are called...
Click to read more »page has also been discussed at ANI and a move was rejected at RMTR. Per WP:RMEC, this shouldn't be closed "before this snowballs", but only if snowball applies...
Click to read more »06:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC) Relist. Procedurally defective as a bad WP:RMEC—no basis for early closure. WP:BADNAC does not apply to Requested moves as...
Click to read more »TarnishedPathtalk 22:48, 23 February 2026 (UTC) Ps, the closing instructions (see WP:RMEC) only provide for procedural closes to occur in the case of discussions started...
Click to read more »bureaucracy? Early RM closures are a part of the process, and detailed over at WP:RMEC, while WP:IMR explicitly says that you absolutely MUST attempt to discuss...
Click to read more »better discussed (if you wished to start one) at WT:RM, the talk page for WP:RMEC. This would also have implications for the criterias WP:ITNBLURB, WP:DYKTAG...
Click to read more »proposals after they have received support from other editors". The cited WP:RMEC is merely an essay, and another page was also cited; the latter page links...
Click to read more »contributions) 22:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC) Endorse as a snowball clause case. WP:RMEC tells us [t]his clause should not be used to close a discussion when a particular...
Click to read more »disruptive, which beyond an invocation of WP:IAR is not allowed under WP:RMEC. They stated in said close that they would take this issue to ANI if they...
Click to read more »hunts> 18:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC) @NightWolf1223 & @Carguychris: per WP:RMEC, an RM may not be withdrawn if any editor "has suggested any outcome besides...
Click to read more »January 2026 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) @Kautilya3 Does this meet WP:RMEC? LLM generation isn't (yet) a reason to close an RM early. If the nominator...
Click to read more »