This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
deletion – guidelines on discussion format and shorthand. Shortcut WP:RGUIDEWP:RGUIDE The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers...
Click to read more »be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...
Click to read more »September 2017 (UTC) WP:Don't worry about performance. You should also read WP:RGUIDE; notably, the first and second sentences. WP:RFD#Keep also makes for good...
Click to read more »become unnecessary. —PaleoNeonate – 01:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC) See WP:RGUIDE and WP:CHEAP. the purpose of redirects is to help people find target articles...
Click to read more »no discussion after at least 7 days, the default result is delete. on WP:RGUIDE eviolite (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »quick search. Flatscan (talk) 04:35, 31 August 2025 (UTC) WP:REDIRECT and RGUIDE says that non-category redirects are cheap, meaning if they solve a problem...
Click to read more »be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...
Click to read more »get the point across, effectively being a rephrase of this passage from RGUIDE: In discussions, always ask yourself whether or not a redirect would be...
Click to read more »up at RfD separately. --Habst (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2025 (UTC) See WP:RGUIDE - "If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for...
Click to read more »Ryazanov (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC) User:Mikhail Ryazanov see WP:RGUIDE good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers will find themselves...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC) @Liz: Per WP:RGUIDE: If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...
Click to read more »wasn't clear, my nomination was for the redirect to be deleted. Per WP:RGUIDE: If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...
Click to read more »to this section. The result of the discussion was speedy keep under WP:RGUIDE point 4, Redirects nominated in contravention of Wikipedia:Redirect will...
Click to read more »(𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom. Also, per WP:RGUIDE, unchallenged RfDs should be closed as delete after seven days, instead...
Click to read more »(implausible typo). @Explicit: is there any reason you relisted this? Per WP:RGUIDE: If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...
Click to read more »(UTC) Redirects without a mention are tagged as {{R without mention}}. WP:RGUIDE, WP:RFD#DELETE and WP:RFD#KEEP do not concern with redirect titles being...
Click to read more »deletion – guidelines on discussion format and shorthand. Shortcut WP:RGUIDEWP:RGUIDE The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers...
Click to read more »acknowledged. The original discussion should have been closed as "delete" per WP:RGUIDE, so I'll do so now. -- Tavix (talk) 02:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC) IbranovskiIbranovski...
Click to read more »briefly mention him somewhere in the Dexter's Laboratory article. Per WP:RGUIDE, redirects are cheap; I don't see the harm in having this, even if it is...
Click to read more »useful and intuitive shorthand for a very long article title. As noted by WP:RGUIDE, "If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for...
Click to read more »deletion – guidelines on discussion format and shorthand. Shortcut WP:RGUIDEWP:RGUIDE The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC) What's unclear about the consensus? WP:RGUIDE says If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has...
Click to read more »opinion. However, if no one but the nominator expressed an opinion, WP:RGUIDE states that If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect...
Click to read more »en:user:Gumbywhale <-> members.aol.com (0%/0%/0% - Added link: members.aol.com/kipler2/rguide.html (Monitored rule: members\.aol\.com - reason for monitoring members\...
Click to read more »contribs) to en:en:Equus (play) (diff). Links: us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/equus.html news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5223520.stm theonion...
Click to read more »Declined. The title you suggested already exists on Wikipedia. Per WP:RGUIDE, I'd suggest discussing on the talk page of either Confounding or Emoticon...
Click to read more »become unnecessary. —PaleoNeonate – 01:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC) See WP:RGUIDE and WP:CHEAP. the purpose of redirects is to help people find target articles...
Click to read more »September 2017 (UTC) WP:Don't worry about performance. You should also read WP:RGUIDE; notably, the first and second sentences. WP:RFD#Keep also makes for good...
Click to read more »us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/of_love_and_other_demons.html (66, 65, 2, 1 R/X/L) us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/of_love_and_other_demons...
Click to read more »not being mentioned there is an issue, consider changing the article.) WP:RGUIDE applies. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 12:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC) I wholly disagree...
Click to read more »Delete. per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:20, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Keep per RGUIDE and RHARMFUL. Pageviews suggest utility; on the other side of the coin,...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom. I would argue that per WP:RGUIDE ("If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...
Click to read more »contribuere (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC) @Servite et contribuere: See WP:RGUIDE. Steel1943 (talk) 20:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC) @Servite et contribuere: It's...
Click to read more »WP:CHEAP, I'd like to point out that implausibility is an outgrowth of WP:RGUIDE point 1: "If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching...
Click to read more »punctuation don't appear in sources. To me, this fits within the principles of WP:RGUIDE: The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers...
Click to read more »gives the best treatment to the subject). Serves an obvious purpose. WP:RGUIDE applies. Claims of WP:OR are not substantiated. -- C. A. Russell (talk)...
Click to read more »aren't actively harming, misleading, or excessively silly – voiced at WP:RGUIDE and at WP:HARMLESS (whether something is harmful or harmless are also valid...
Click to read more »taken as uncontroversial and the nom's preferred outcome enacted. See WP:RGUIDE point 3. Thryduulf (talk) 11:56, 7 May 2026 (UTC) to maybe be a little unfair...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Keep. WP:RGUIDE applies. Nominator's WP:NOTABILITY argument confuses Wikipedia's notability...
Click to read more »sure I was arguing {{R with possibilities}}, {{R from subtopic}}, and WP:RGUIDE ("redirects are cheap"). To wit, here are some insource search results that...
Click to read more »clear as you say it is, then we should be able to speedy keep these per WP:RGUIDE and not keep having these discussions: Redirects nominated in contravention...
Click to read more »Template:Redirect hatnote at Fan magazine pointing to fanzine and vice versa. WP:RGUIDE applies. Additionally proposed merges should be dealt with by a proper merge...
Click to read more »quick search. Flatscan (talk) 04:35, 31 August 2025 (UTC) WP:REDIRECT and RGUIDE says that non-category redirects are cheap, meaning if they solve a problem...
Click to read more »(contribs) on page Sara Sidle (diff) -> Added link: members.aol.com/kipler2/rguide.html (Monitored rule: members\.aol\.com - reason for monitoring members\...
Click to read more »up at RfD separately. --Habst (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2025 (UTC) See WP:RGUIDE - "If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for...
Click to read more »particularly significant issue to me. Plausibility is the wrong metric. WP:RGUIDE states: If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching...
Click to read more »particularly significant issue to me. Plausibility is the wrong metric. WP:RGUIDE states: If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching...
Click to read more »of redirect: VGA-Copy Reason: Its name without the hyphen-minus, per WP:RGUIDE/redirects are cheap. Plus sometimes spelled without the hyphen-minus, see...
Click to read more »