Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
We are developing a new way for readers and editors to work together. Article feedback allows anyone to easily make suggestions about a page and help editors...
Click to read more »WP:RFF is a place where feedback on articles can be requested via a peer review process. These articles may already be in the main encyclopaedia, or they...
Click to read more »of the publication itself, which were few. Cheers, Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 12:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC) Comments by Nev1 "to deal with the rebels from...
Click to read more »to make links clear as to wiki relevance. Thanks, Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 02:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Few short things, in depth later: Check for...
Click to read more »to make links clear as to wiki relevance. Thanks, Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 02:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Few short things, in depth later: Check for...
Click to read more »use AfD in this fashion, or other people's names. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 14:05, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Delete on the issues that MarcusBritish has...
Click to read more »project Pharmacology. Hopur2 (talk) 13:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC) This RFF page is normally for basic feedback on new articles. If you want a proper...
Click to read more »referencing needs more work, please see WP:REF for info. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 03:31, 3 October 2011 (UTC) My recent revision of article for the review...
Click to read more »have been made in recent months which have remained stable. Previously on RFF. Madcoverboy 17:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Please see automated peer review...
Click to read more »sycophant, needs restraining due to chip on his shoulder. Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] 03:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC) I am sick of your unfounded accusations on...
Click to read more »UncleSam300 (talk) 16:28, 25 September 2011 (UTC) Reviewed by Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] 16:44, 26 September 2011 (UTC) This film sounds really awful, haha... anyway...
Click to read more »Reviewed and copy-edited - no further comments since last RFF (24 August). Incidentally, RFFs are done by anyone, not just admins. Allisonellis (talk)...
Click to read more »September 2011 (UTC) Try: Wikipedia:Requested articles Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 04:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Is there a way to have an article passed...
Click to read more »to a lot of different parts of the encyclopedia. I mostly do stuff at WP:RFF, WP:AFD, and T:TDYK, but I also write my own articles, improve some I see...
Click to read more »process, so hopefully I'm replying correctly, also I didn't discover WP:RFF until after posting this.), I've decided that the list of activities should...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Fails WP:V, WP:OR and WP:N. Creator acknowledged at RFF that it is based entirely on his own experience. Adrian M. H. 10:17, 9 October...
Click to read more »Why is it a "represent[ation]"? "RFF is a new film festival, which will have it's 3rd edition this January. The RFF is organized and run by a group of...
Click to read more »presidential campaign. That will probably increase as primary season nears. RFF feedback was that it might be a GA candidate if pictures and external links...
Click to read more »to respond is usually in the original RFF, or open a dialogue on my talk page to maintain feedback. With a new RFF, such as this one, there is always the...
Click to read more »ColourBurst 21:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC) Comment I am quite sure that RFF has been mentioned and featured in a number of photography magazines, but...
Click to read more »clue what article you're referring to, unless you do. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 08:42, 22 October 2011 (UTC) I have just published a new article about this...
Click to read more »Seandalytx (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC) Reviewed by Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 22:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC) References 1, 4, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 16 to...
Click to read more »Baronetage, and NPP. Overall, I participate in WP:NPP, WP:AIV, WP:UAA, WP:RFF, WP:CSD, WP:AFD, WP:MFD. As far as the backlog, I'm working on clearing out...
Click to read more »non-academic people are not too familiar with, either. Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] 00:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC) Keep The person gets coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »which the tags are an impediment.) I and an editor who responded to the RFF both felt that the tags were at best uninformative, and through discussion...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:20, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Reviewed by Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 16:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Looks okay to me, as is, however, you've...
Click to read more »15 October 2006 (UTC) Hello, Roger the red! I'm Hildanknight, creator of RFF. I must commend your excellent use of references; I'd never be able to write...
Click to read more »editing and sheer ignorance and disregard for policies. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 14:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC) But edit-warring and ignorance are not reasons...
Click to read more »consists of recent changes + new pages patrol, as well as commenting on WP:RFF. Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) Why when I enter "Rff" in the search box, it redirects to "RFF" with "(Redirected from Rff)", but when I enter "Tgf" in the search...
Click to read more »although I will occasionally try to use reviews from before they started their RFF arm, Kirkus Indie. (And I'd like to state that part of what makes me so leery...
Click to read more »sufficiently, the article should be considered non-notable. Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] 11:43, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Keep. Basing notability judgements on the...
Click to read more »as: history, breeding, health, characteristics, etc. Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] 01:38, 25 September 2011 (UTC) Can you please help me to make this page...
Click to read more »promising article, and probably a little "too good" at the moment for a basic RFF. I would highly recommend you visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history...
Click to read more »used commercially (ex. Lézarde Express Régionale). If it is owned by the RFF, use the basis "Xxx–Yyy railway", with an en dash. (ex. Paris–Marseille railway)...
Click to read more »what needs to be changed in order to get my article approved is to do a WP:RFF. If you could please help me out and provide me with specific modifications...
Click to read more »not therapy" in my own words. You knew that though. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 04:10, 25 November 2011 (UTC) Regardless of whether a user is deservedly...
Click to read more »concerns clear - that way, someone, like an admin, might update the main RFF page template to include an [edit] per article or instructions as you described...
Click to read more »enjoy lending a hand to other interesting backlogs such as WP:URBLPR and WP:RFF. If you wish to experience a little more around dispute resolution then WP:3O...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Spotted this on WP:RFF - I personally see nothing notable, and nearly all the citations appear promotional...
Click to read more »to defend himself here, due to a hasty indef block. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 04:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC) Editor has placed an unblock request and a...
Click to read more »Would recommend you review the MOS concerns above, then request another RFF to address content, once done - please look at a few other Wiki articles...
Click to read more »newspaper or magazine articles about her would be a good start. As a helper at RFF I don't like to nominate articles for deletion unless they are copyright...
Click to read more »March 2011 (UTC) I feel that the current userspace draft is ready for an RFF. The reliability of the sources has been raised as a potential problem, and...
Click to read more »leaving a load of redundant backlinks to this one. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 23:36, 31 December 2011 (UTC) I'll take care of it if concensus forms. The...
Click to read more »advance. Dr. J. Kauffmann 11:18, 6 September 2011 (UTC) Note to reviewer: RFF added by Faustus III (talk · contribs). Hi, I changed the reference on the...
Click to read more »getting feedback on articles, although PR works on a higher level than RFF. RFF is an initiative I started several months ago, for newcomers to get feedback...
Click to read more »Yomangani, please come back to RFF! Other Wikipedians who are familiar with policy and friendly to newcomers could help out at RFF as well. --J.L.W.S. The Special...
Click to read more »Pierredaura (talk) 12:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC) Reviewed by Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] 17:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC) Firstly, a nice job and gives a good first...
Click to read more »(third from right) on the editing toolbar. I'm Hildanknight, creator of RFF. Here are some suggestions for improving the article: Read other articles...
Click to read more »noticeboard/IncidentArchive757#Controversial moves Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 10:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC) The issues are related, but not the same. Dolovis...
Click to read more »September 2011 (UTC) Note: When reviewing the RFF I did not compare deleted versions with this one - RFFs are for considering current articles, not for...
Click to read more »—Ryulong (竜龙) 10:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC) Fair use? Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 11:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC) Still not applicable.—Ryulong (竜龙) 11:50,...
Click to read more »behaviour [1] including removal of {{IPSock}} templates. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 17:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC) Accused parties may also comment/discuss in...
Click to read more »sandbox and get it laid out so it is more readable as an article, before a RFF can be done properly. Ma®©usBritish [talk] 10:48, 27 August 2011 (UTC) Thanks...
Click to read more »(UTC) Article does not appear to be complete - would recommend you request RFF again, once you deem the article finished. Thanks, Ma®©usBritish [talk] 12:59...
Click to read more »this article into its random GA generator box anyway. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 14:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Support great piece of work. MisterBee1966 (talk)...
Click to read more »User:Snmavronis/sandbox will create such a sandbox if you wish. Listing it at WP:RFF for feedback when you're done will also help minimise the danger of another...
Click to read more »made me laugh so hard, a bit of wee came out! O_o Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] Note, only now did I notice Davina's mention of me in her above statement...
Click to read more »(UTC) Domenico.y Domenico.y (talk) 15:22, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Odd that this RFF is directed at me rather than awaiting any reviewer - I have no knowledge...
Click to read more »have been doing around here. My contributions are around WP:INA, WP:PID, WP:RFF and improving Indonesia-related articles. Cheers -- Imoeng 11:06, 8 October...
Click to read more »Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage. Thanks, Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 22:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC) I've done a couple, but there are a few more;...
Click to read more »reiterate some of the concerns mentioned. Having first "met" Domenico.y via WP:RFF a few weeks ago upon reviewing a couple of the articles he created, please...
Click to read more »wouldn't dirty my keyboard by accepting the blame. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 18:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Sheodred was involved in what I consider to...
Click to read more »20 February 2010 (UTC) That was done several days ago re archiving of WP:RFF - no response. And see above. – ukexpat (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Rskp (talk) 05:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC) Reviewed by Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 15:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Looks very good, your experience shows - I...
Click to read more »8/CSIS-CNAS_AgeofConsequences_October07.pdf (4815, 4, 1, 1) www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-Resources-164_Thomas%20Schelling.pdf (4815, 4, 1, 1) www.unepfi...
Click to read more »*smoochy* Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 23:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Support block He's clearly not competent! Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 23:21, 17 November 2011...
Click to read more »basis to draft an article (in your userspace) and ask for comment using WP:RFF." Jaime070996 22:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC) It seems like you have a good...
Click to read more »the LGV (High speed lines) which are individual tracks that belong to the RFF and not the SNCF. On the other it has the TER which are the regional train...
Click to read more »I currently rotate between are article creation/expansion, stub-sorting, RFF, AFD and RFA), with the occasional bit of recent-changes patrol, mainly when...
Click to read more »17 May 2011 (UTC) Hello, this is the second request for feedback. (Last RFF was April 30, 2011) Is this article suitable to be added to WP? Vjhamilton...
Click to read more »tracks instead of rendering them as walkways and levels. He disambiguates RFF correctly. And although he did not respond to my post to his talk page, his...
Click to read more »too for acting on her behalf as "concerned friend". Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 01:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC) I agree (except that she did notify the two...
Click to read more »This sort of thing should be placed at the HD, or NCH if you are new to WP. RFF is specifically for feedback about a user's work on an article. Adrian M...
Click to read more »attention • AN • Bot • CBB • Class • Index • Newsroom • Requests • RfC • RfF • Third RefDesk (Hum • Sci • Math • Comp • Lang • Misc) • VP • Pol • Prop...
Click to read more »tone. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 15:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC) (creator of RFF) Megan Zheng has become my third DYK, but I'd still appreciate feedback and...
Click to read more »and friendly to newcomers, to watch RFF and regularly respond to requests posted by newcomers. I intend to develop RFF into an established Wikipedia process...
Click to read more »matt83/Nora_Lustig 18:44, 7 July 2009 — RFF - Jake Edwards 00:08, 8 July 2009 — Dragonlance novels dating 17:07, 9 July 2009 — RFF User:Tntdj/"Bridging chipset"...
Click to read more »notice may be applied if they still need it, and they can then submit to RFF before attempting to re-issue. Fæ (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC) Beaufort...
Click to read more »do not know if it is required for sock IPs. Thanks, Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 01:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC) Simply put, a range block is not an option...
Click to read more »far in the matters surrounding this page's creator. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 13:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC) And as I have said, I don't support trolls...
Click to read more »REN REO REP REQ RER RES RET REU REV REW REX REY REZ RFA RFB RFC RFD RFE RFF RFG RFH RFI RFJ RFK RFL RFM RFN RFO RFP RFQ RFR RFS RFT RFU RFV RFW RFX RFY...
Click to read more »which only aims to defile Wikipedia than be an asset. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 06:11, 23 November 2011 (UTC) Delete This has nothing to do with making...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, and posting your feedback request (it increases the activity of RFF). Since you did not provide any link to the article or "diff", I'm afraid...
Click to read more »views) — http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/Corcoran Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] reporting at 09:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC) MarcusBritish is on a spree to...
Click to read more »everyone regular is a "stalker", don't you think? Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 10:58, 6 December 2011 (UTC) @Beyond my Ken: This is my original account...
Click to read more »Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 09:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC) [202] — first proof of wanting a neutral resolution, directed at Seanwa111111. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] [203]...
Click to read more »ren reo rep req rer res ret reu rev rew rex rey rez rfa rfb rfc rfd rfe rff rfg rfh rfi rfj rfk rfl rfm rfn rfo rfp rfq rfr rfs rft rfu rfv rfw rfx rfy...
Click to read more »bot's not been told and has just refreshed the old page with the latest RFF/MATH content, overwriting the redirect that was created, which of course...
Click to read more »rogers.html (9027, 97, 2, 1) ejournal.nbii.org (9027, 97, 2, 1) www.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-02-03.pdf (9027, 66, 1, 1) www.globeaward.org/ (9027, 4, 1, 1)...
Click to read more »drifting into a pet-project of three or four people before fizzling out (WP:RFF, anyone?) – but that's no reason not to give it a try. – iridescent 21:22...
Click to read more »addition, which department should I complain to about backlogs, such as WP:RFF and WP:RFP? --J.L.W.S. The Special One 06:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Can...
Click to read more »the best way to encourage more editors with experience to contribute to WP:RFF? Thanks for any help you can offer. BusinessAsUnusual (talk) 11:45, 12 April...
Click to read more »117.96.23.153 (talk) 12:36, 15 October 2007 This is not in the remit of RFF, Ranjeet. See the header for a brief explanation of what this page is here...
Click to read more »(/MEDIA /BIO /ECON /HIST /LANG /NAME /PAG /PHIL /POLY /SCI /SOC /STYLE) WP:RFF WP:RSN WP:SPI WP:THIRD WP:DRV) Things to do CAT:BACKLOG CAT:M CAT:WRI WP:AFC...
Click to read more »attention • AN • Bot • CBB • Class • Index • Newsroom • Requests • RfC • RfF • Third RefDesk (Hum • Sci • Math • Comp • Lang • Misc) • VP • Pol • Prop...
Click to read more »for foundership/FrigidNinja is then seriously nominated for deletion. The RfF eventually closes as successful in an alternate universe. Bishzilla is nominated...
Click to read more »AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 18:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC) This kind of revenge WK:RFF should result in banning. --Reacespeaces (talk) 08:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and there are extensive citations. Article has already been subject to a RFF and peer review. I believe this is an exemplary article and I look forward...
Click to read more »non-academic people are not too familiar with, either. Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] 00:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC) Keep The person gets coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »sure, actually; I wasn't aware of that method until I saw that article at RFF. Adrian M. H. 21:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC) See Template talk:Ref for the documentation...
Click to read more »I saw that first bug yesterday; it's annoying when watching changes at RFF (where editors are asked to use links as titles). Adrian M. H. 16:27, 6 September...
Click to read more »are not sufficiently up to scratch for a peer review can be directed to RFF. Adrian M. H. 22:04, 30 September 2007 (UTC) I think one of the main reasons...
Click to read more »for failing to meet the inclusion criteria. You can seek more help at WP:RFF. Karenjc 08:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC) See Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft...
Click to read more »new, despite my reasonable level of self-confidence. Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] 06:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC) Sorry LeonidasSpartan, I didn't vote for...
Click to read more »civility/makes occasional mistakes 23:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Wouldn't WP:RFF and WP:CNB (depending on the exact situation) be what you're describing? – iridescent...
Click to read more »fr/article.php3?id_article=7199&var_recherche=acc%E8s+au+r%E9seau+ferr%E9 www.rff.fr/pages/docref/autre/accueil.a. 2007-11-13 10:20:10: User fr:Bisoke (talk...
Click to read more »(like WP:PAIN) to remove bad requests per the instructions; or maybe even WP:RFF. Whatever takes your fancy :) User talk: Very good. I like this number, as...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.sangritoday.com/rff-2022-shankhnaad-best-rajasthani-film-best-actor-award-to-shravan-sagar (R/Xmeta/L)...
Click to read more »appreciated! Jouster (whisper) 22:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Greetings, Jouster! RFF is for requesting feedback on articles. I don't think there's a process for...
Click to read more »this particular variant, although I would support periodic reconfirmation RffBs for crats. It would serve the same presumed purpose of weeding out people...
Click to read more »9000 edits elsewhere could be major rewrites, creations, third opinions, RFF responses, AFD comments, VP comments, editor assistance, NCH responses, GA...
Click to read more »drafts, wizard) fixed" -- a fair number of people who participated in the RfF wanted AfC abolished, not fixed. This IMO plays into their hands.) DES (talk)...
Click to read more »document fast-moving and primarily new-media covered issues like gaming. RFF only has a few people, and sometimes there's just nobody around comfortable...
Click to read more »editing and sheer ignorance and disregard for policies. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 14:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC) But edit-warring and ignorance are not reasons...
Click to read more »use AfD in this fashion, or other people's names. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 14:05, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Delete on the issues that MarcusBritish has...
Click to read more »to Wiki) pronunciation "requesting on forgot password" - originally from RfF Could an admin lend a hand in helping me stop a scam? User page name calling...
Click to read more »September 2011 (UTC) Note: When reviewing the RFF I did not compare deleted versions with this one - RFFs are for considering current articles, not for...
Click to read more »you think you have satisfied the various criteria, list your draft at WP:RFF to get other users' feedback on its suitability. One word of warning though...
Click to read more »(also declined) - I don't think that any of these need to exist. See also WP:RFF Please do not play April Fools' jokes outside of this time - while what you...
Click to read more »made me laugh so hard, a bit of wee came out! O_o Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] Note, only now did I notice Davina's mention of me in her above statement...
Click to read more »you can create the page. Work on it until you're happy, then list it at WP:RFF where you can get feedback before it goes live. Doing it this way will help...
Click to read more »views) – (View AfD) Fails WP:V, WP:OR and WP:N. Creator acknowledged at RFF that it is based entirely on his own experience. Adrian M. H. 10:17, 9 October...
Click to read more »18:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC) Please see [19] also. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 21:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC) Comment: Ah, the fun continues! Olivia is...
Click to read more »moment, as OP mentions, it's not worth retaining. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 23:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC) Keep This is actually part of an experiment...
Click to read more »to Jeeva (artist) as a starter; I'll leave some very basic feeback on the RfF page re references, and some how-to-do-references stuff on editor's talk...
Click to read more »process. This article has recently been through Request For Feedback - see [RFF of Little Thetford]. I have referenced as best I can (as a new editor) wikipedia...
Click to read more »proceses, you could always come back and lend a hand from time-to-time here at RfF, or pitch in at New Page Patrol, or any other page for helping newbies. Just...
Click to read more »(I name no names). Upon my request, he has occasionally helped clear the RFF backlog. In short, support, for he makes IRC not suck, and we should try...
Click to read more »sufficiently, the article should be considered non-notable. Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] 11:43, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Keep. Basing notability judgements on the...
Click to read more »seeing some real impact. The downside is that I'm pretty much 90% of the RfF for the last couple weeks, so I could really use some backup. Even just two...
Click to read more »Pichpich (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC) Delete; originator asked for advice at RfF, explained to him while it was still on his userspace that the current footnotes...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Spotted this on WP:RFF - I personally see nothing notable, and nearly all the citations appear promotional...
Click to read more »REN REO REP REQ RER RES RET REU REV REW REX REY REZ RFA RFB RFC RFD RFE RFF RFG RFH RFI RFJ RFK RFL RFM RFN RFO RFP RFQ RFR RFS RFT RFU RFV RFW RFX RFY...
Click to read more »create the article in your user space first, then seek feedback on it at WP:RFF before it goes live. Karenjc 14:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC) The subject IS notable...
Click to read more »Kittybrewster ☎ 22:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Delete - I saw this at WP:RfF, and agreed with another editor there that at the very least this article...
Click to read more »although I will occasionally try to use reviews from before they started their RFF arm, Kirkus Indie. (And I'd like to state that part of what makes me so leery...
Click to read more »in the title: see WP:NCCORP). I would strongly suggest you now visit WP:RFF and list the article there, requesting feedback to help you polish it. Once...
Click to read more »ts/CEO_briefing_climate_change_2002_en.pdf (8176, 21, 1, 1) www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-Resources-164_Thomas%20Schelling.pdf (8176, 17, 1, 1) www.cnas...
Click to read more »edgy. You're definitely beyond the need for technical feedback from generic RfF volunteers, you just need to find a few more expert collaborators. Good luck...
Click to read more »19:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Done via talkpage request. Ma®©usBritish [Talk][RFF] Request for review and help moving an article http://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »(assign permissions) Editor for several years; rollbacker; active at WP:RFF WP:NCHP, WP:HELP and the refdesks. Would be happy to help out with flagged...
Click to read more »read WP:MOS and WP:LEAD and fix it up as much as possible. Take it to WP:RFF and get general feedback on it, fix it up from there. Then I would open a...
Click to read more »Silver: The Vi Cowden Story (history · last edit) from Rainier Film FestRFF home page"© 2006-2011 RainierFilmFest.com.All Rights Reserved." We hope (talk)...
Click to read more »ts/CEO_briefing_climate_change_2002_en.pdf (7998, 19, 1, 1) www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-Resources-164_Thomas%20Schelling.pdf (7998, 16, 1, 1) www.cnas...
Click to read more »to Jeeva (artist) as a starter; I'll leave some very basic feeback on the RfF page re references, and some how-to-do-references stuff on editor's talk...
Click to read more »– ukexpat (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC) {{Done}} - not really a WP:RFF question. Hi request for feedback watchers. I sometimes poke around here...
Click to read more »message on their talk page asking them to review it list the article on WP:RFF --ColinFine (talk) 23:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC) Thank you for your prompt...
Click to read more »Pichpich (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC) Delete; originator asked for advice at RfF, explained to him while it was still on his userspace that the current footnotes...
Click to read more »an individual person. Once you feel it's ready, list your article at WP:RFF to get feedback from other users before the article goes live. Doing it this...
Click to read more »Thanks, Taric25 (talk) 22:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC) (I commented earlier at the RfF) Here are some automatic suggestions... Please expand the lead to conform...
Click to read more »receive community feedback on a template I have created, something like WP:RFF but for templates? Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 10:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC) I'm...
Click to read more »user sandbox space when prompted to do so. Once it's ready, list it at WP:RFF to get feedback before it goes live. However, you may have fallen foul of...
Click to read more »feedback for the portal? Cause I think its impossible to get it from WP:RFF and WP:PR. Cheers -- Imoeng 15:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC) I thinks its alright...
Click to read more »as unsuitable before it's ready. Once you think it's done, list it at WP:RFF and other editors will offer advice and suggestions for improvement. They...
Click to read more »replies to items on RfF, but I don't always get a response. That could be a disincentive for some. I suspect that many of the postings to RfF would be as well...
Click to read more »missed it) bamse (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Hi, just posting this RFF because I wrote an article, and I'm not sure if all the formats, etc. are...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) I have listed a proposed article for review at COIN, FEEDBACK, RFF, and EAR with very little feedback and no edits or suggested edits to the...
Click to read more »involved with the Cold Fusion article, having made a total of 5 posts on an RfF. However, I'd like to use my brief exchange with ScienceApologist as an example...
Click to read more »Thanks! Mangarah (talk) 14:37, 17 April 2011 (UTC) You got a reply to your RfF two days back; did you read that? MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:07, 17 April 2011...
Click to read more »Are there any experienced editors who would like to get more involved with RFF? It is under staffed at the moment and would benefit from more editors watching...
Click to read more »just mad that Jimbo's your father. ZappaOMati 23:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC) My RfF closed as successful in an alternate universe, so you are now de-meatpuppeted...
Click to read more »methods listed at WP:DR. Thanks. Will check out WP:ER. Please check out WP:RFF. I created it to help new articles get feedback. As for WP:DR, I posted my...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC) You may also want to check in with this same RfF at WP:WikiProject Television; they are also likely more familiar with what...
Click to read more »attitudes displayed in their work I have encountered at the refdesks and RFF, and the DYK mess. Courteous, calm and lucid, with a history of tackling...
Click to read more »or asked to participate in this DRV, as the editor participating in the RFF of an earlier version of the article in question. A bit confusing. The editor...
Click to read more »medical advice. —BradV 20:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC) Resolved I have not used RFF before so I hope I am doing this right. I have developed a new section for...
Click to read more »February 2010 (UTC) Anyone know what's up with Cluebot? It hasn't archived WP:RFF for a number of days. Has it shuffled off this digital coil? Thanks. – ukexpat...
Click to read more »the other requests and responses, look at [1] and [2] from the July 23rd RfF. The proposed article has improved but there are still some issues. The 'External...
Click to read more »please address these issues and then file a new Request for Feedback on the RfF page for that day. MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC) I can't...
Click to read more »this page anyway. – ukexpat (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Moved to WP:RFF. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 14:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC) Resolved –...
Click to read more »eligible for deletion at any point someone runs across them. The goal of RfF isn't for volunteers to help folks fake the funk into publication, we're...
Click to read more »one option is to just keep asking on the Wikipedia:Help_desk or try WP:RFF. You can also ask an individual person for help, for other options, and for...
Click to read more »or asked to participate in this DRV, as the editor participating in the RFF of an earlier version of the article in question. A bit confusing. The editor...
Click to read more »the corresponding German article Leumar01 (talk) 10:55, 12 May 2011 (UTC) RfF is mainly about formatting/layout, and you're spot on there. I suggest you...
Click to read more »Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] The final sentence of the Rebellion in Southern France needs a source. Done Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] "The pamphlet would...
Click to read more »from such advocacy sites. Secondly, and this is far beyond the purview of RfF (we just help people format their footnotes, find sources for articles about...
Click to read more »be deleted under WP:CSD#G4. I would recommend requesting feedback at WP:RFF or another venue first. Please make sure that you move the article, not copy...
Click to read more »to meet WP:Notability (books). I'd say you're past the point of needing RfF on this particular page, and would suggest you move on to expert topic advice...
Click to read more »11 May 2011 (UTC) Content-wise looks good; you're far beyond out help at RfF. Except for that at least one or two of your cats are a bit too broad. "Catgory:Ecology"...
Click to read more »help on making RFF an established Wikipedia process, and seeking regular participants who will respond to requests for feedback posted on RFF. --J.L.W.S....
Click to read more »Hi, I've spent today editing the Politics of Bristol article today and I think it looks a lot better for it. I've hidden some of the information on the...
Click to read more »so bad as to prevent publishing at the moment. Note also in your previous RfF I gave you some links to GoogleBooks hits on the term. You really want to...
Click to read more »after a further rework and sourcing you need more feedback, consider WP:RFF, as there is nothing to restore here.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:42, 22 November...
Click to read more »occasionally asking for help here at the help desk, also try WP:CBB, WP:RFF, WP:AN, WP:RFE, WP:VPA, and WP:RFC (for articles). If you really want the...
Click to read more »(UTC) OTRS notice added and requester advised on userfication and the WP:RFF process. Fæ (talk) 12:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Ensa Machine Bouw b.v....
Click to read more »CaBM96SRr977LDkRJveZpXSmphj9PFfTwP3hW5clUVgDxWa3JlUmsQ7_1xZslqaOQ-7cMwjdkRffMrUzMxrjQIU-qjLWg98Lm2GnJRZknduTHlIpO-mjkVFpCaK7Mahrh4aNiSgH8DIA0F4WAKfPw...
Click to read more »Kittybrewster ☎ 22:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Delete - I saw this at WP:RfF, and agreed with another editor there that at the very least this article...
Click to read more »wait for me to read them! SocialPsych231 (talk) 14:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC) RfF isn't so much for grammar/copyedit, other than to just say "you need to copyedit"...
Click to read more »be much more in-depth. Thanks Bizzmag 17:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC) Copied to RFF. I will respond there. - Adrian M. H. 18:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC) Resolved...
Click to read more »ColourBurst 21:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC) Comment I am quite sure that RFF has been mentioned and featured in a number of photography magazines, but...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) Hi, this article has been given a RfF Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_August_30#San_Fernando_Central_Secondary_School...
Click to read more »prospect of further work and targets (GA, etc.) go to RFF. For more minor edits that do not fit at RFF, EA/R is the best place. Adrian M. H. 16:42, 30 July...
Click to read more »respectabilityusa.com rethinkvenezuela.com reverb.org rewilding.org rfa.org rferl.org rff.org rideauinstitute.ca rightnowwomen.org rightsandresources.org righttolife...
Click to read more »Requests for Feedback Shortcuts WP:FEEDWP:FEED WP:RFFWP:RFF WP:RfFWP:RfF This page provides comments and constructive criticism about articles that you...
Click to read more »REN REO REP REQ RER RES RET REU REV REW REX REY REZ RFA RFB RFC RFD RFE RFF RFG RFH RFI RFJ RFK RFL RFM RFN RFO RFP RFQ RFR RFS RFT RFU RFV RFW RFX RFY...
Click to read more »feedback for the portal? Cause I think its impossible to get it from WP:RFF and WP:PR, also, all Indonesians probably have gone to bed now :P. Cheers...
Click to read more »the article now and I was hoping to call upon my fellow editors here at RfF to help provide an external objective viewpoint on the article as it stands...
Click to read more »conflict)Hi. As for getting others' feedback, you may want to bring it up on RfF, the associated Wikiproject, or maybe the helpdesk. However, in some cases...
Click to read more »'Straight edge metallic hardcore from canterbury, england. Lots of nice metallic rffs and lots of mosh. ReleasesGhenna Made Flesh CDEDSplit 7...') 04:21, 11 Dec...
Click to read more »Resolved – or, at least, answered; OP is now receiving further advice at WP:RFF, and has also filed an RM on his/her user subpage. Not posted at WP:RM however...
Click to read more »being prematurely deleted before it's ready, and consider listing it at WP:RFF to get feedback before it goes live. By the way, please don't type in all...
Click to read more »created it in user space in which case you can submit it for review here: WP:RFF to get feedback on it. Another page that might be useful for tip on creating...
Click to read more »besides WP:DRAW and any applicable WikiProjects like Tango said, WP:HD and WP:RfF are good for things like this. —Akrabbimtalk 01:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC) That...
Click to read more »:( Dåvid ƒuchs (talk • contribs) 23:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Hi, try WP:RFF :) Bjelleklang - talk 23:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC) The main problem with the...
Click to read more »and there are extensive citations. Article has already been subject to a RFF and peer review. I believe this is an exemplary article and I look forward...
Click to read more »the page on WP:RA? -Tjarrett (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2010 (UTC) Here or WP:RFF are good places to ask for review. – ukexpat (talk) 16:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC) Answered – Directed to WP:RFF. Danger (talk) 10:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC) Shmuley Boteach (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »LaraLoveT/C 19:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC) See this closely related discussion at RFF. Later parts of it are very relevant. Adrian M. H. 20:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »ask an experienced editor to assess it for you, either ono-to-one or at RFF or EA. Adrian M. H. 11:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC) I created an entry for a person...
Click to read more »process, so hopefully I'm replying correctly, also I didn't discover WP:RFF until after posting this.), I've decided that the list of activities should...
Click to read more »in a user subpage -- User:Wikicule/Rocudo for example -- then ask at WP:RFF for it to be reviewed. If you cannot support notability by citing significant...
Click to read more »User:Glitterspray/article B, and then go to the Requests for Feedback page WP:RFF? and ask for feedback. Anchoress 07:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC) (edit conflict)...
Click to read more »presidential campaign. That will probably increase as primary season nears. RFF feedback was that it might be a GA candidate if pictures and external links...
Click to read more »I have changed something about Paul Revere for reasons that i have, i would have changed it back to what it was before in about 3 days so by Saturday and...
Click to read more »the article now and I was hoping to call upon my fellow editors here at RfF to help provide an external objective viewpoint on the article as it stands...
Click to read more »Why is it a "represent[ation]"? "RFF is a new film festival, which will have it's 3rd edition this January. The RFF is organized and run by a group of...
Click to read more »ren reo rep req rer res ret reu rev rew rex rey rez rfa rfb rfc rfd rfe rff rfg rfh rfi rfj rfk rfl rfm rfn rfo rfp rfq rfr rfs rft rfu rfv rfw rfx rfy...
Click to read more »soliciting comments on how to improve the aesthetics of the affected articles, WP:RFF may be more appropriate. Hope this helps, --Aarktica 13:32, 22 October 2007...
Click to read more »have been made in recent months which have remained stable. Previously on RFF. Madcoverboy 17:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Please see automated peer review...
Click to read more »taught in most countries). Until I saw the article, I was going to suggest RFF but it is nowhere near that level. As for leaving the project: there is little...
Click to read more »edu/southasia/conference/conference07schedule.html http://www.flahertyseminar.org/rffs_past_2006_artists.htm http://www.ektaonline.org/events/tfsa2001/thinair.htm...
Click to read more »aware of WP:NPOV. You can ask for detailed help on a userspace draft at WP:RFF- Wikipedia Request for feedback. Liqudluck✽talk 21:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »process. This article has recently been through Request For Feedback - see [RFF of Little Thetford]. I have referenced as best I can (as a new editor) wikipedia...
Click to read more »this article into its random GA generator box anyway. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 14:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Support great piece of work. MisterBee1966 (talk)...
Click to read more »editor to fix, i.e. look over, the article xe is developing here. However, an RfF has already been opened, as well as talk page messages and a detailed review...
Click to read more »V(LEH:B)X1YM91;^ANA2E5F%SK..B(F^B8_0Z"TKZ^RQ(^C;$^CK%;&&( M[&&)-B"?3>6DV7VE.*6G&)^RFF=6.FVW>_&+6VC\&,.G>G&GM?0ZV-`@;`*$ M0O&"6-PE^.&I..9KN"4[8Y9.8SNJ.3HX)ZF/VJQ'NK$...
Click to read more »Thanks, Taric25 (talk) 22:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC) (I commented earlier at the RfF) Here are some automatic suggestions... Please expand the lead to conform...
Click to read more »732 ESFS/DET-3|732nd Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron|DET-3|Det-7|RFF 619 1 73mm LRAC 1 73rd Infantry Division (South Korea) 1 75th Infantry Division...
Click to read more »views) — http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/Corcoran Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] reporting at 09:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC) MarcusBritish is on a spree to...
Click to read more »RFE/RL Research Institute ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) RFF Press Pub Resources for the Future Pub 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google...
Click to read more »and that this is a problematic RfC, so I struggled to vote “Problematic RfF” or “Not Fringe”. I chose the latter because find it nearly impossible for...
Click to read more »732 ESFS/DET-3|732nd Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron|DET-3|Det-7|RFF 619 1 73mm LRAC 1 73rd Infantry Division (South Korea) 1 75th Infantry Division...
Click to read more »