Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Requests for de-adminship (or for desysop) may be made in the following ways: Wikipedia:Administrator recall, where editors may compel an administrator...
Click to read more »they'd be too much work. This addresses this objection by eliminating most of the work we're currently doing at RFA and moving that effort over to RFDA....
Click to read more »03:16, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) To be clear, this petition is not listed at WP:RFDA, since that procedure has not been accepted. This is a petition only. --...
Click to read more »process would be "RfDA". Features of RfDA High barrier to RfDA-- RfDA must be difficult to initiate. Resistant to mere retribution--- RfDA must recognize...
Click to read more »perennial fixture at the Village Pump. Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship (WP:RFDA) lists many of these proposals; they seem to appear approximately quarterly...
Click to read more »de-Godkingship (not to be confused with Requests for de-adminship at WP:RFDa) is a page to nominate yourself or others to no longer be a Wikipedia God...
Click to read more »or with any user. Purge the cache to refresh this page Shortcut WP:RFDAWP:RFDA History of de-adminship proposals/Old proposal is a page to request removal...
Click to read more »normal channels of WP:DR, such as: WP:RFC/Use of administrator privileges, WP:RFDA, and WP:RfAr. It is unlikely the user is familliar with these. Model is highly...
Click to read more »successful and so are making ad hominen attacks on people involved. — WP:RFDA --Mistress Selina Kyle (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) 17:33, 1 January 2006 (UTC) Blocking was...
Click to read more »evidence yesterday. However, I've since changed my mind, due to his calling an "RFDA" on Snowspinner, thereby crossing the line not once, not twice, but three...
Click to read more »anyway, isn't this exactly the reason why half of you guys voted against WP:RFDA? "Oh dear, User:Ugen64 might get harassed by a request for de-adminship -...
Click to read more »here because I don't think the 3 different groups (do nothing, RFDA for all admins, RFDA for future admins) "play well" together; we'll probably do best...
Click to read more »standing, or even arbcom needs to refer and admin to RFdA; pretty active bureaucrat clerking at RFdA to ensure valid arguments and NPA. Basically, I have...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Despite a straw poll showing an approx. 2:1 ratio against his WP:RFDA policy proposal, Netoholic has initiated a proposal to have Snowspinner stripped...
Click to read more »16:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Nominating user should pay a visit to Wikipedia:RFDA#How_to_request_someone.27s_de-adminship and note that all past intent for...
Click to read more »of Wikipedia's norms or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus. Shortcuts WP:RFDAWP:RFDA WP:DESWP:DES WP:DESYSWP:DESYS WP:FIREDWP:FIRED...
Click to read more »tools, the community should also have some process for revoking that access. RfDA proposals generally consist of the elements: Initiation when some objective...
Click to read more »your opinions on adminship renewal/removal proposals, such as listed in WP:RFDA? I do not think its fair to ask the candidate to make a campaign promise...
Click to read more »cannot be viewed as unconnected with the RFDA process, since it's a subpage. It's bad faith to proceed with the RFDA idea when it looks like being voted down...
Click to read more »laid out at WP:RFDA per this revision, with the addition of one more criterion, "Conduct unbecoming of an administrator", until WP:RFDA or an equivalent...
Click to read more »contribs) Easy to understand Threshold for commencement - a single user The RFDA must then be certified by any two administrators A single Bureaucrat makes...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Of course not, he just complains. I would personally suggest WP:RFDA as a framework for stating what administrators may not do, along the general...
Click to read more »about the time of their RfDA), or does the whole process become non-binding (i.e. the admin can refuse to initiate the RfDA and nothing happens), or...
Click to read more »friends". 75.36.154.163 (talk) 08:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)John Well, WP:RFDA has a list of admins who have had their privileges withdrawn. Stifle (talk)...
Click to read more »then perhaps a user RfC and in irredeemable of cases, the opening of an RFDA to remove them. I hope that helps better answer the question. -- Sabre (talk)...
Click to read more »flag on the English Wikipedia. El_C 03:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC) Huh? WP:RFDA should be altered, to reflect that, then. I'll have to file this report yet...
Click to read more »see no reason for which Alkivar ought to be desysopped. Of course, per WP:RfDA, one may always construct an RfC, which will surely bear out any actual malfeasance...
Click to read more »REGIO (1 in 1) REMMM (1 in 1) REMİ (2 in 1, 2) REVER (1 in 1) RFCS (1 in 1) RFDA (1 in 1) RGLJ (1 in 1) RGRA (1 in 1) RHDI (1 in 1) RICRI (1 in 1) RIEV (2...
Click to read more »away. Take a look at things such as Wikipedia:Administrator recall and WP:RFDA before you start, just to see what has been proposed in the past. Chris cheese...
Click to read more »MLauba criteria process Modeled after MBisanz, with some tweaks based on WP:RFDA and recent WP:CDA changes. Per statement on my RfA, will of course be mooted...
Click to read more »already exists. --Golbez 12:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC) we need a working WP:RFDA. We may not have needed it in the past, but we do now. CAT:AOR should be...
Click to read more »dozen or so previous, similar, and rejected or failed proposals listed at WP:RFDA, to see which wheel you're reinventing? TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:08, 15 January...
Click to read more »January 2006 (UTC) Such proposals have been rejected in the past (see WP:RFDA), but the community has evolved since then. A possible hazard would be that...
Click to read more »Creation, but it turned out it got redirected. So please participate at RfDA. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk)...
Click to read more »Problems" to me -- indeed one of the points in "Five Problems" was that any "RfDA" process must be appealable to arbcom, which this process is not. Any supporter...
Click to read more »of reasons why we have no standard process for revoking adminship, see WP:RFDA --tjstrf talk 23:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Is there a spell checker for editing...
Click to read more »trying to write an encyclopedia. Badly designed proposals like this one and RFDA are capable of dealing real damage to wikipedia data, editors and reputation...
Click to read more »Chacor 08:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Okay, the July 4 thing threw me. WP:RFDA said June 10, so you made Chacor after the desysopping. Still, you claimed...
Click to read more »Creation, but it turned out it got redirected. So please participate at RfDA. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk)...
Click to read more »September 2020 (UTC) If you are really worried, go to WP:ADMINABUSE or WP:RFDA. HeartGlow (talk) 14:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC) HeartGlow30797, perhaps...
Click to read more »here? A: There seems to be a broad consensus on some form of involuntary RFDA along the same lines as the RFA process. Given the small number of cases...
Click to read more »optional questions from Roux 7. What is your opinion of the new proposal at RFDA? A: I definitely feel that administrators should be held accountable for...
Click to read more »him being de-adminned: this is the sort of thing that the various aborted RfDa policies were made for. --Carnildo 05:57, 8 August 2005 (UTC) Disruptive...
Click to read more »RFA unless that trust has been dramatically lost. (Ie by the creation of RFDAs, RFCs, or in-depth negative discussions of many admin actions.)--Gordonrox24 | Talk...
Click to read more »admin bit by a bureaucrat as a matter of course, and anyone can start an RfDA (Request for De-adminiship), modeled on the current RfA system, but (obviously)...
Click to read more »successful. Example implementation For each admin there should be a page WP:RfDA/USERNAME, which should contain a list of editors willing to deprive an admin...
Click to read more »Note to closing Admin: This vote should be disregarded because there is a RfDA for this user. Renerpho (talk) 09:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Reply: I am the...
Click to read more »RFA unless that trust has been dramatically lost. (Ie by the creation of RFDAs or the like.)--Gordonrox24 | Talk 21:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC) Strong support...
Click to read more »especially when "recall" has been long exposed as a broken joke and WP:RFDA is a page to give the illusion that we'll even have a de-adminship process...
Click to read more »though we really have no idea whether that would work or not since we have no RfDA to model it on. Vast majority of editors do fine with either godmode light...
Click to read more »August 2006 (UTC) Keep - This is really the best solution for non-ArbCom RFDA since it's more community-driven and not based on a lynch mob (the latter...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC) It is worth noting to those citing WP:RFDA that Wikipedia:Administrators is the relevant official policy, which contains...
Click to read more »adminship, nor of the recall category, unless/until we have some form of WP:RFDA as an acepted process applicable to all admins. (And that doesn't look likely...
Click to read more »major changes to a proposed process, Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship (RFDA). Netoholic removes the banner that says "This proposed process is currently...
Click to read more »recent trend at RFA in favor of changing standards, for instance, the current RFDA proposal (on WT:RFA). To the opposition: give it a few months, and watch...
Click to read more »the community as a whole shouldn't retain the bit; not necessarily to the RFDA process as proposed. Hope that helps clear things up. –Juliancolton | Talk...
Click to read more »they actually have tools to harm Wikipedia. If you want examples, see WP:RFDA for list of former admins who were desysopped by ArbCom for ignoring policy...
Click to read more »those administrators. The lack of such a community process (noted at WP:RFDA and WP:PEREN) has long frustrated a significant minority of the community...
Click to read more »is wrong with the current adminship process; I don't know if it is RfA, RfDA, life terms, or something else. Deleting this page will not fix our problems;...
Click to read more »they need a break. At least that's the gist as I capture it. We need an RfDA procedure with all the checks and balances that were suggested before (you...
Click to read more »06:04, 6 July 2013 (UTC) I'm giving serious thought to reintroducing my old RfDA outline to the community; I feel like it'd be an excellent venue for bringing...
Click to read more »successful. Example implementation For each admin there should be a page WP:RfDA/USERNAME, which should contain a list of editors willing to deprive an admin...
Click to read more »right to remove the bit. It also goes hand-in-hand with my ideas for an RfDA process, but that's just a secondary reason for my support of the concept...
Click to read more »Creation, but it turned out it got redirected. So please participate at RfDA. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk)...
Click to read more »A successful recall petition should lead to a request for de-adminship (RfDA) instead of a "re-request for adminship" (RRfA). This shifts the focus of...
Click to read more »make them clear to the wider community. AR is big – right next door to a WP:RFDA process, and arguably the biggest change to administrator policy since WP:INACTIVITY...
Click to read more »Investigations and an Association of Members' Advocates! And another proposal for RfDA... 2005-03-28/Return_of_stats: Imagine keeping detailed statistics about...
Click to read more »edit) to a request for arbitration in April 2004. More details available at RfDA. 2112 rush (talk · contribs · count) – Last edit April 15, 2007. Formerly...
Click to read more »Magazine Mag RFD (magazine) Mag 5 1 5.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) RFDA ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) RFDesign ? — ? 1 1 1.000...
Click to read more »work, where 10-15 editors need to express support for desysopping for a RfDA to be initiated, and then the whole community can !vote in the second the...
Click to read more »