Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Shortcut WP:CRWP:CR Use the closure requests noticeboard to ask an uninvolved editor to assess, summarize, and formally close a Wikipedia discussion. Do...
Click to read more »16:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC) If you believe a discussion needs formal closing, you can request it at WP:RFCl. Regards SoWhy 18:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussion has died down, as in no comments for 3-4 days, ask for closure at WP:RFCL. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:26, 18 September 2022 (UTC) I would like to...
Click to read more »appeal. SecretName101 (talk) 00:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC) I've listed it at WP:RFCL. BilledMammal (talk) 02:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC) User indef-blocked per WP:NLT...
Click to read more »Please ping me! 06:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC) I've also opened a request at WP:RFCL, though I think we can let it run the full month. Second, there are open...
Click to read more »@Serpentine noodle and Objective3000: I've moved this discussion from WP:RFCL to WP:AN, as this is the proper venue to challenge a closure under Wikipedia:Closing...
Click to read more »discussions for closure, which itself is a good thing given how large WP:RFCL / WP:RM / etc backlogs can get. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:57, 31 October...
Click to read more »closure, but found that Cunard had beaten me to it. I've just relisted WP:RFCL § Talk:One America News Network#RFC on One America News Network - Application...
Click to read more »closure. Usually these run for seven days, and usually I would post at WP:RFCl, but (1) consensus seems quite clear to me WP:SNOW) and (2) this is an extremely...
Click to read more »to|Chess}} on reply) 00:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC) Apologies, meant to link WP:RFCL in the original point. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply)...
Click to read more »welcome. RFC at Adolf Hitler and RFC at Indigenous Aryans were listed on WP:RFCL for weeks and both discussions saw split between users who were supporting...
Click to read more »there is a disagreement over an RFC that never received a closure is WP:RFCL. It's silly to talk about sanctions and the like before that. If the RFC...
Click to read more »defense of the non-admin closer that I had to actively request a close at RFCL. The original conversation petered out and then was auto-archived. Had an...
Click to read more »soon. —usernamekiran (talk) 17:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC) I've listed it at RFCL. BilledMammal (talk) 17:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC) I am curious, what happens...
Click to read more »2600:1700:C960:2270:3CD1:517A:41BE:55DB (talk) 02:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC) WP:RFCL is where to request an uninvolved editor closes an RfC. As for the topic...
Click to read more »expressed your opinion in Special:Diff/891331481 and Special:Diff/891641889. WP:RFCL advises for formal closures "where the issue is a contentious one", even...
Click to read more »respective arguments. I propose we just ask an uninvolved admin (maybe at WP:RFCl) to assess the consensus in the discussion we already had for days now instead...
Click to read more »their talk page. Slatersteven (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC) I've made an RFCL posting. Hopefully we can get a proper closure soon. BSMRD (talk) 20:43,...
Click to read more »links. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC) Currently I'm using WP:RFCL every time I want to link (and in my head this feels so strange, because...
Click to read more »editor closing"/"asking for closure at WP:RFCL" is meant to accomplish the same thing, so either is ok. The WP:RFCL method can possibly add a little Caesar's...
Click to read more »but won't hold my breath. If I thought it would be accepted, I'd go to WP:RfCl and request a ruling on whether or not there really is consensus favoring...
Click to read more »WP:DRV would be bureaucracy, then I would suggest putting in a request at WP:RFCL, as per WP:INVOLVED you should not be assessing the consensus of this discussion...
Click to read more »it's worth, I did explicitly ask for both parts of the RfC to be closed at RfCl, and I did ping Winged Blades of Godric when they only closed the first part...
Click to read more »RfC has run for over 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: Telesur. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »contribs - library) 17:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC) (Point of order) Per WP:RFCl, a formal request for comment (asI think this is?) is usually expected to...
Click to read more »February 2020 (UTC) As this RfC has elapsed, I have requested closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: Sixth Tone. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »still time. Anyone is free to request a close by uninvolved editors at WP:RFCl once the 30 days are over although this probably needs closing by a larger...
Click to read more »page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Per request at WP:RFCL, I have closed the recent RfC regarding the Authority Control template. Since...
Click to read more »is no issue with allowing it to expire on the 19th and listing it at WP:RFCL? BilledMammal (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC) I suggest closing the...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC - CoinDesk as a source. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »looks like this thread will be auto-archived shortly. Should I go to WP:RFCL to request a close or could someone here do so? Onceinawhile (talk) 14:41...
Click to read more »only they can close them. Tdshe/her 16:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC) I think WP:RFCL would be a better choice. And non-admins can close afd:s. Gråbergs Gråa Sång...
Click to read more »committee on [Date]", with a link to the section of the talk page where this RfCl is moved. I don't see merit in revisiting the case long enough to revise...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: Liliputing. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: MintPress News. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: National Enquirer. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: is "Golden Harvest or Hearts...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Newsweek RfC. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: The Daily Caller. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: TASS. — Newslinger talk 04:54...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: Dexerto. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RFC: Moratorium on "general reliability"...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: HispanTV. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: The Points Guy. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »March 2020 (UTC) As this RfC has elapsed, I have requested closure at WP:RFCL § Rfc: Arab news is a reliable source?. — Newslinger talk 03:31, 14 March...
Click to read more »(UTC) As this RfC has elapsed, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RFC: Remove "reliable historically"...
Click to read more »4 April 2020 (UTC) As this RfC has elapsed, I've requested closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Adding generally reliable sources...
Click to read more »January 2020 (UTC) As this RfC has elapsed, I have requested closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: KenRockwell.com. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »this RfC has run for 30 days, I've submitted a request for closure at WP:RFCL § Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: The Epoch Times. — Newslinger talk...
Click to read more »dealt with in secret. A: No, the delay is excessive. I have not followed the RfCl, but from what you tell me, the communication of the committee leaves a lot...
Click to read more »dealt with in secret. A: No, the delay is excessive. I have not followed the RfCl, but from what you tell me, the communication of the committee leaves a lot...
Click to read more »I strongly disagree with that; I also note that it has been listed at WP:RFCL for over two weeks. BilledMammal (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC) I've...
Click to read more »just a reminder to put |done=yes in the initiated template when closing an RfCl :) DrStrauss talk 12:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC) DrStrauss, if you'll take a...
Click to read more »clear, anyone, including involved editors, can close a discussion. See WP:RFCL (#1). -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC) The discussion above...
Click to read more »in to something close to a WP:RFC, I suggest we ask for a closure at WP:RFCL when that time comes. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »11 February 2019 (UTC) @Joseph A. Spadaro: You can post a request at WP:RfCl. See that page for guidance. RudolfRed (talk) 22:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »via “second statements” and instead am inclined to move to WP:RFC or WP:RFCL. 2A00:23C6:B808:7701:D555:5B1E:CBF5:D014 (talk) 16:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »unwilling or unable to review there close, editors may request a new close at WP:RFCL. Comments by arbitrators: Comments by parties: If meatpuppetry is proven...
Click to read more »Closing per request at WP:RfCl. Reading through the discussions, both here and on the article's talk page, there does seem to be a weak consensus that...
Click to read more »only one new !vote in the last week and the OP has requested close at WP:RFCL. As this is WP:NOTAVOTE some qualitative vetting occurred. I, first, applied...
Click to read more »Procedural restart, in the section immediately below. I am going to list on WP:RFCL because I am not sure if this makes me involved or not. Note that this is...
Click to read more »August 2024 (UTC) @Thryduulf It might be a good idea to put that one on WP:RFCL. I'd do it, but I have 2 pending ones there already....
Click to read more »noticeboards (Pppery has a seemingly never-ending stream of them posted at WP:RFCL) that this would likely help to address by broadening the pool of editors...
Click to read more »really beneficial? It wasn't on 30 October (when I requested a close at WP:RFCL, and I doubt it is now either. - SchroCat (talk) 19:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »infobox photo. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 11:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC) I see it's on rfcl. Waiting sucks, but it'll happen at some point. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Climate apocalypse has an RfCl regarding a proposed merge discussion. If you would like to participate, the RfCl is here, which also links to the...
Click to read more »Sometimes the comments made gave some sort of guidance and you go by them. WP:RFCL is an option, even if archived. And a discussion can be restored from the...
Click to read more »agree; it's past time to close this close review. I've put in a request at WP:RFCL. BilledMammal (talk) 17:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC) Split this discussion to...
Click to read more »Jusdafax (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2026 (UTC) Requested a close for this at WP:RFCL. sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:30, 10 February 2026 (UTC) Thank you...
Click to read more »Belato, @Ealdgyth, @El C, @Callanecc, would you mind if I took this to WP:RFCL? -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 03:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC) This case has little...
Click to read more »