Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
twice. When relisting for a third (or further) time, or when relisting a discussion with a substantial number of commenters, the relisting editor should...
Click to read more »options of keeping, relisting, or walking away, a non-admin closer often chooses to relist the discussion. Their rationale for relisting is that the vote...
Click to read more »personal opinion and may be tempted to "relist" in an attempt to gather more support for their preferred outcome. Relisting a debate that has no opposition to...
Click to read more »Assisted: Automatic Programming Language(s): Perl Function Summary: Relists AfD's (see {{relist}}) upon being triggered to do so by an administrator. Edit period(s)...
Click to read more »editor objects to the relisting of MFD discussions because it rearranges the paperwork. At least one editor thinks that relisting of MFD discussions is...
Click to read more »available unless you are extended confirmed. In addition to closing or relisting discussions, XFDcloser can undertake actions to implement a close: Add...
Click to read more »""){ relistReason = "No [[WP:RELIST|reason]] given for relist #" + (relistCount+1) + "."; } t.value += relistReason; } t.value += "|3=" + (relistCount+1)...
Click to read more »this moment. However, this is the main reason why I say "relist for now" rather than just "relist," as I can see certain things resulting in a downward spiral...
Click to read more »— is prefilled for you! What if you want to relist the debate instead? No problem. Just click the "relist" tab next to "close" and everything is prefilled...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 07:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »other participants may be overly involved with a particular perspective. Relisting immediately may come across as combative. Immediate second round participants...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »(UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. 1isall (talk | contribs) 08:53, 14 July 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »information was not considered during the discussion, commenters should suggest Relist followed by their rationale. Commenters should identify whether or not they...
Click to read more »found on that page. At RfD, it automates the following actions: Relist: adding the relist template, moving a relisted discussion to the new page (the script...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was: Relist Omni Flames (talk) 12:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lord Roem...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 07:50, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Strong delete drunkcruft...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Relisting in individual AFDs. —— Eagle101 Need help? 03:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »emerged, consider relisting the discussion: To relist a discussion, do the following: Open the discussion for editing. Add your relisting comments, ideally...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »it both ways, if you want to relist now, withdraw the DRV and wait a decent time (a month is typical) before relisting at AfD. If you want a DRV with...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »relistReason === ""){ relistReason = "No [[WP:RELIST|reason]] given for relist #" + (relistCount+1) + "."; } t.value += relistReason; } t...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »closing administrator may, at their discretion, choose to relist the discussion. If you decide to relist: Leave a record on the nomination page and then remove...
Click to read more »page. The result of the debate was undelete and relist. --Myles Long 17:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC) Relist. The {{tfd}} notice was put on Template talk:Mills...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. Are these new sources of a quality that would allow this article...
Click to read more »Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Squawk7700 (talk) 08:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC) (Discuss) – Korea University...
Click to read more »entries of any previous editors: Endorse the original closing decision; or Relist on the relevant deletion forum (usually Articles for deletion); or List...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:32, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC) If deleted, recreate...
Click to read more »User:Redditaddict69's relist, partly because WP:RELIST argues against a third relist, and partly because you shouldn't relist a discussion you participated...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC) If deleted, redirect...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »this page. The result was keep. This is why, at an admin's discretion, we relist. ✗plicit 05:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »relist them all separately. I hope someone else can do it because it took me forever to list it this way, and I simply don't have the time to relist them...
Click to read more »it or assign the issue to someone. What if I don't agree with a rating? Relist it as a request or contact (to be determined) who will handle it or assign...
Click to read more »fairly clear after the merge and is very clear following relisting, so closing early per WP:RELIST.--Salix (talk): 08:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC) Quartus...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 08:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 03:51, 9...
Click to read more »mw:OOUI, and should work better on small/mobile devices. Previewing close and relist messages is now automatic, refreshing as you type New XFDC preferences,...
Click to read more »did you relist this? power~enwiki (π, ν) 07:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC) After seven days I've added relist.Here was my mistake.I've added relist without...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist, hoping for some discussion. Please add new comments below...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »page. The result was Delete; consensus, including comments made after relist, is to delete.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:56, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Louis Bennett...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »consensus. Relisting comment: Previous relist seems to have caused this discussion to get lost due to a technical glitch. Procedurally relisting to get back...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »delete (mixed in with keep disambig. delete rest votes), 3 keep all, 3 relist and 1 merge. Feel free to bring back any page as a valid disambiguation...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to discuss potential redirect targets. Please add new comments...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Unused userbox, seems to...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 15:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as redirect previously listed as part of Wikipedia:Redirects...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Close/relist seprately - These should be judged on individual merits. Artw 18:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC) Close and relist as above. As for notability...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was Relist separately Redwolf24 (talk) 06:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC) No, this isn't for...
Click to read more »Please do not edit this page directly unless you know what you're doing! It relists content from individual pages for separate months. To add and change listings...
Click to read more »A relisting is different than a close. Mkdwtalk 05:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Relist just proves a uniamous delete, I see little value in the Relist. LibStar...
Click to read more »more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Can't soft-delete so final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: See last relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 16:06...
Click to read more »The result of the debate was RELIST. This is strictly a no-consensus, but with only two divergent votes, I'm going to relist in hopes of a better debate...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. and relist. I'm not uninvolved in this debate, but I believe this consensus is so clear...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was procedural closing to relist articles individually. ●DanMS • Talk 05:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC) AfDs for...
Click to read more »ark // 17:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Keep Sigh, another case of relist, relist, relist. If no policy-cited arguments can be found in 7 days for deletion...
Click to read more »rationale and no discussion of the source presented despite two relists, I see no point in relisting yet again. SoWhy 12:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC) Sarkis Acopian...
Click to read more »comments on this AfD. I did not think a relisting comment would be needed as it was pretty obvious why the relist took place unless some absolute dimwit...
Click to read more »WP:RELIST. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: relist to...
Click to read more »for deletion are reasonable and I don't see the point in continuing to relist. Aervanath (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as the prospect of a Merge is being contested by the nominator...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was Restore and relist. Now at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gordon Cheng (Second nomination) Wikipedia:Votes...
Click to read more »discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Last relist, since no additional feedback since first relist... Please add new comments below this...
Click to read more »and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Per discussion with @Djm-leighpark: and the lack of a prior relist, I'm going to relist this Please add new comments...
Click to read more »remains active but there have been no new bolded !votes since the first relist on August 5. It is now mostly already involved editors going back and forth...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: An additional relist, per the previous relist statement Please add new comments below this...
Click to read more »relist is to neutrally encourage more discussion. Rather than attempting to undermine people, which you're relist there clearly does. Fine to relist it...
Click to read more »it would be very inappropriate to relist again.—S Marshall T/C 18:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC) I agree, a third relist would be inappropriate. 78.26 (spin...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »(UTC) Reject AfD per failing WP:BUNDLE and relist separately. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 08:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC) Relist separately, they got nothing in common...
Click to read more »template's talk page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 24. Primefac (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Template:YouTube...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please see my comment on the 1st relisting. Please add new comments below this notice...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC) Inexistent user book. Normally...
Click to read more »this notice. Thanks, Mkdwtalk 19:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Note From WP:RELIST "Relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation...
Click to read more »discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Not a third relist, just relisting for Bijoy2020 as their recent relist didn't take effect except for...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »choose to relist the discussion. When relisting a discussion: Copy the discussion to the current day's nomination page and add {{subst:relist}} to the...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:25, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result of the debate was no result, relisting individually upon requests. Melchoir 19:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC) Non-notable...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Not counting the nomination, there are four participants. One...
Click to read more »17 March 2016 (UTC) Administrator note This was part of a relisting and a contested relisting (see page history); however the only strong argument for...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Hate to relist a third time but the first relist had a pointed comment that was not addressed...
Click to read more »which is not how this discussion has transpired. Nowhere at WP:RELIST does it say that relists are "only meant" when consensus is controversial, as you state...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No discussion was generated by last relist. Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice...
Click to read more »I don't see one forthcoming with the language issues. No objection to a relist at a time where more input might be garnered. Star Mississippi 14:43, 31...
Click to read more »re-added to the AfD log. So you may wish to consider the 7 July relist the first relist. Or not, your call. A Traintalk 17:14, 7 July 2017 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: So far, all deletion arguments are based upon sources in the...
Click to read more »THE PAGE WAS UNDELETED, THE DECISION TO RELIST IT HAS NOT BEEN MADE. IF THE DECISION IS TO UNDELETE (NOT RELIST) THIS SECOND DISCUSSION SHOULD NOT OCCUR...
Click to read more »the result is obvious, it becomes just a beaucratic action to relist. I could see relisting when there is a legit discussion or where the closing admin...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No participation. Please add new comments below this notice....
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was close, pending separate relistings Waggers (talk) 14:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Richard Asante (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. Can those wanting to Keep this article locate a few reliable...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After 3 relists, a consensus has not been established. (non-admin closure) — Music1201...
Click to read more »Yep, you did the right thing, although Template:Relist is typically used for relisting. See WP:RELIST for more information. Guoguo12--Talk-- 01:03, 10...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to solicit more opinions although it's hard to see a reason to...
Click to read more »reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) See previous AfD here Relisting. A small private school which provides no reliable sources for its notability...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Relisted. My apologies; I didn't know how to relist. (non-admin closure) The Duke of NonsenseWhat is necessary for thee?. 20:16...
Click to read more »Consensus that the result of the previous AfD was correct. No need to relist this one a third time. ansh666 21:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC) AfDs for this...
Click to read more »template's talk page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 4. Primefac (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC) Template:Lincuri/google (talk ·...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep. Adding a request...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Not the best sourced article (or even adequately sourced)...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Lack of participation. Please add new comments below this notice...
Click to read more »consensus. Relisting comment: Still unsure of consensus, maybe after relisting this once more we can achieve consensus. If after this relist no additional...
Click to read more »more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting again as previous relist yielded no further discussion. Please add new comments...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »watch | logs) This userbox was originally listed in the TfD space. I am "relisting" this at MfD per precedent/guidelines, and will be copying the original...
Click to read more »These are soft deletes, due to the low rate of participation despite three relists. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:51, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Luxembourg Trade and...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »at WP:RELIST, you affected the process of the discussion. Now that you've also !voted in the discussion, I think you should undo the relisting and let...
Click to read more »discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Due to a bug in the relist tool and Cavarrone's double-relist on 2 November, the transclusion on...
Click to read more »It is tempting to relist this debate again for further input, but having due regard for the third and fourth paragraphs of WP:RELIST, there is nothing...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »and failed to address adequately WP:V concerns. This is a procedural relisting, so I abstain. Xoloz 01:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Because Tony is playing...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After three relists and a lack of discussion, consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NN organization, WP:NOTPROMO. Relist due to no votes at all despite relist per NPASR. MSJapan (talk) 17:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Considering that the last time this article came to AFD the decision was to Keep, I'm willing to relist a third...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Can't soft delete due to prior AfD's so relisting. Please add new comments below this notice...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Techie3 (talk) 16:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC) This draft was originally...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting because the article has been declined for proposed deletion in...
Click to read more »template's talk page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 6. Primefac (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Template:Leave feedback (talk ·...
Click to read more »consensus. Relisting comment: The previous relist seems to have caused this AfD to get lost due to a technical glitch. Procedurally relisting to get it...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Currently the only !votes are from SPAs so I'll relist again to get some independent opinions...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. Please consider the article on its own merits, and not on...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as no discussion has taken place. Please add new comments below...
Click to read more »no consensus. I don't think the situation will change with an additional relist so I'm closing this as No Consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 14 December...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. Still no opinions here besides a tentative nomination statement...
Click to read more »discussion rules ([1], [2]) nor it is a valid argument for relisting a discussion for WP:RELIST. Cavarrone (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC) Delete. Not...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Large enough that I would prefer to relist at least once to see if anyone has any thoughts...
Click to read more »no consensus. No consensus after two relists, and insufficient reason to relist for a third time per WP:RELIST. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter (talk)...
Click to read more »page. The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. 2 relists and 20 days is long enough. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41...
Click to read more »this page. The result was no consensus. I don't see a consensus after 3 relistings so I'm closing this as No consensus. It might very well be brought to...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion...
Click to read more »Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Relisting comment. I usually don't relist non-blp articles a second time unless they haven't been...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »Only significant comment since the relist was to refute the reliability of the sources provided prior to the relist —SpacemanSpiff 02:34, 18 October 2018...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 13:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC) As Amader Shomoy is being...
Click to read more »further discussion of sources following the initial relist, one more keep argument made since second relist. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter (talk) 10:59,...
Click to read more »template's talk page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 13. Primefac (talk) 20:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC) Template:NandiAwardBestActor...
Click to read more »no clear consensus established, the conclusion by the bureaucrats was to relist the RfA. The final statement was by Warofdreams, who has said that the bureaucrat...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was delete. sufficient consensus after relisting DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting again as previous relist yielded no further discussion. Please add new comments...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 15:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 09:45,...
Click to read more »soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. As only one comment has come in since the relist, not making a definitive argument for keeping or deleting, and no edits...
Click to read more »Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC) Third relist rationale. I really don't like relisting articles for a third time but I found out that the...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No participants so far. Please add new comments below this notice...
Click to read more »may also list it for a Peer review. What if I don't agree with a rating? Relist it as a request or contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball who will handle...
Click to read more »relist template, rm and list the elementary schools individually? J-ſtanTalkContribs 15:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Concur with speedy keep and relist individually...
Click to read more »not close it early. Re-list the discussion for more comments (although relisting can become abusive) Close as Delete. Comment on the discussion yourself...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, relist individually (WP:SNOW). --Fang Aili talk 03:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC) Boson...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 07:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Strong delete drunkcruft...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 07:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Strong delete drunkcruft...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After three relists and a lack of discussion, consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One more relist to give editors time to respond to Goldsztajn's argument....
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep (speedy of relist per nominator request). After Midnight 0001 19:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Davina...
Click to read more »discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The reliability of one of the two sources seems to be questionable; relisting to allow exploration of other...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Bold third relist. Discarding the latest contribution which does not really...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One more relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠...
Click to read more »entries of any previous editors: Endorse the original closing decision; or Relist on the relevant deletion forum (usually Articles for deletion); or List...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 13:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC) WP:FAKEARTICLE for a...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist, hoping for additional, thoughtful participation. Please add...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 15:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete, bizarre relisting discounted. Skomorokh, barbarian 00:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC) THUDD...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »delete. There was already a consensus to delete, relist totally unnecessary. Closing now per WP:RELIST. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia:WikiProject...
Click to read more »stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 29 December...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relist to allow the creator (and others) time to comment Please add new...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After three relists and a lack of discussion, consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: 1st relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:51...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 06:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:34, 17...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:33, 10 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:52, 18...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 11:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC) Has been accepted into...
Click to read more »for me to relist this discussion after expressing an opinion (above) though I didn't remember making a comment here when I did the relisting. I apologize...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:33, 10...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: relist final Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »Transformers fan wikis. I am IAR and closing this up despite the recent relist, as third relists are an extraordinary measure that shouldn't be deployed for relatively...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) Relisting comment. The first relist was 3 days after filing due to the AFD not being transcluded so a second relist is reasonable. --Ron...
Click to read more »it or assign the issue to someone. What if I don't agree with a rating? Relist it as a request or contact (to be determined) who will handle it or assign...
Click to read more »(while "Keep per X") was also guideline-based. ~72 hours after the second relist, this is about as good as it gets. (non-admin closure) —SerialNumber54129...
Click to read more »clearer consensus. Relisting comment: From the nomination comments it seems like a merge or redirect might be appropriate here, so relisting rather than moving...
Click to read more »bg/1912.htm. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC) This is a relist, since the contributor was not notified. It does appear to be a direct translation...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:39, 10...
Click to read more »Talk 16:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC) @UY Scuti: we relist discussions to seek more consensus but at WP:RELIST it states that generally discussions should not...
Click to read more »to ISO/IEC 29119#ReplacedStandards. Consensus here is weak despite two relists. That said there doesn't seem any support for keeping the article, and...
Click to read more »not formally closed. Endorse decision. Overturn... decision. And then... Relist discussion. Change to no consensus. Change to <whatever decision it should...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was no consensus. Since WP:RELIST precludes a third relist, this is pretty much the only option available. No prejudice...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: See previous relist comment Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947( c ) (m) 03:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947(c) (m) 03:15, 4 October...
Click to read more »based arguments are not included and waste editor time through constant relisting and non-consensus closes New users with the potential to become good admins...
Click to read more »Close paraphrase. Relisting. VWBot (talk) 00:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Rimutaka Tunnel (history · last edit) Close paraphrase. Relisting. VWBot (talk) 00:22...
Click to read more »stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 20:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 11:12,...
Click to read more »article (just meta-comment about how to classify the topic) after multiple relists. RL0919 (talk) 06:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:32, 10...
Click to read more »relisted a few hours early. I'll just keep the relist up, since someone else will just have to relist it in a few hours anyways. Spirit of Eagle (talk)...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 12:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 00:56, 19...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:33, 10...
Click to read more »two consecutive relists with no further discussion, I feel we're at a point of no consensus given the requirements to do a third relist. Barkeep49 (talk)...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 01:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 06:03, 9...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 16:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 03:48, 9...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was trainwreck. Please relist seperately. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Catalyst...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »result was no consensus. No agreement and minimal participation after two relists. RL0919 (talk) 02:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: no comment, relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Third Relist was not necessary - unopposed for 23 days. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:09, 25 October...
Click to read more »admin does. TheHYPO (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Keep Main article, Relist subarticles separately. 'itunes originals' gives 140k hits on yahoo. It...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 21:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 08:11, 26...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was no consensus. A fourth relist would be crazy even to relist on analysis of sources pointed out. (non-admin closure) J947(c)...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 13:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC) A user made these POV...
Click to read more »the relist are talking about entirely different things. In the particular circumstances of this case, I think a renomination is preferable to a relist. No...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist as there are still comments being made to this discussion....
Click to read more »this page. The result was no consensus. While I think that my previous relist has been amply justified by the spirited discussion that followed, I also...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:39, 10...
Click to read more »consensus and can be determined to be the actual long-standing title. Relisting is an option when a discussion cannot otherwise be closed, usually due...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 16:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 22:00, 4...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 13:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. The pre-relist section was plagued by SPAs, and in any event, since the AfD was not properly...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947( c ) (m) 05:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947( c ) (m) 03:27, 17 October...
Click to read more »Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Squawk7700 (talk) 08:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC) Korea University Medical...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting, maybe someone can look into new sources. Please add new comments...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:39, 10...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:33, 10 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:52, 18...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 13:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC) Stale userspace draft...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:36, 10...
Click to read more »editing Wikipedia:Renominating for deletion WP:RELIST Guideline on immediate relisting Wikipedia:Relisting can be abusive Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2026...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947( c ) (m) 18:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947( c ) (m) 21:41, 20 October...
Click to read more »have improved the article apart from the early relist and not letting run for 168 hours. But the early relist has wound me up like it did on Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »eligible to close AfDs and so for Relisting? I thought only sysops are eligible to do so - because Relisting is per WP:RELIST only "allowed" for users who...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment - This is weird. It seems that MBisanz (talk · contribs) deleted...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 07:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep, although it needs...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Withdrawn per perennial relisting and sources found by MichaelQSchmidt. Non-admin closing....
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 07:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Strong delete drunkcruft...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947( c ) (m) 18:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947( c ) (m) 21:41, 20 October...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After three relists and a lack of discussion, a consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin...
Click to read more »org/toi/bengal/h11.htm Land and Local Kingship in 18th Century Bengal. Relist. One section had been tagged; I've found issues in others. Some of this...
Click to read more »good relist has a meaningful relist comment, to refocus discussion, or to call back early participants to a later made important point. Empty relists based...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After three relists, no firm agreement has been reached as to what to do with the article....
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Note: A previous relist apparently failed to actually move this to the correct redated list, I assume...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to close an old log page, and because the consensus I see I cannot...
Click to read more »needs work, but deletion is not clean up. Sheldybett's explaination for relisting does not make sense. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:33,...
Click to read more »of the discussion was: no consensus . No consensus to delete even after relist. I am going to move it to "conception date celebrations" because if you...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was delete. consensus after relistings DGG ( talk ) 22:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Miss Supertalent (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The article was proposed for deletion in November 2013, so it...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After three relists, , and lack of discussion, a consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin...
Click to read more »so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: There appears to have been a snafu here in relisting this discussion--Czar relisted it and added...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) I'm not sure why this got two relists. Two !votes calling for a redirect before the first relist plus the nomination's "delete" should have...
Click to read more »it or assign the issue to someone. What if I do not agree with a rating? Relist it as a request or contact (to be determined) who will handle it or assign...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »still is after the relist). Secondly, per WP:RELIST, this is not an appropriate situation for a relist. Relists are for situations where there is not already...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:39, 10...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:39, 10...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Can someone explain why this can't be fixed through editing ...
Click to read more »conditional temporary keep for now, and if this does not get translated, please relist this article to the AfD. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 06:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relist #1 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:45...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:39, 10...
Click to read more »last three weeks to establish a consensus. No solid grounds for a relist per WP:RELIST (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:33, 10...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Last relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Seems like No consensus right now. Please add new comments...
Click to read more »template's talk page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac (talk) 03:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC) Template:Rajput class...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was keep. Relisting isn't a button you press when you're not sure what to do. Only relist when it is actually necessary. In this...
Click to read more »‑Scottywong| soliloquize _ 04:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Removed accidental double-relist; actual relist log is for 15 February 2014 --slakr\ talk / 11:50, 18 February 2014...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:33, 10...
Click to read more »dominant view is that the close should be endorsed. Those arguing for a relisting are mainly basing their reasoning on the swift nature of the close rather...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 18:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC) Relist note:' I normally wouldn't relist a non-BLP a second time, but I'm not convinced a soft delete...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 22:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 07:48, 17...
Click to read more »stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 20:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 11:14,...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Still no consensus even after two relists Please add new comments below this notice...
Click to read more »http://www.federalstreetgallery.com/federal__street__gallerycharlescolombo.htm. Relist. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC) International Raoul Wallenberg...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was relist articles individually. m.o.p 08:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC) Edelmiro Abad...
Click to read more »marked as being too much like a press release for almost 6 years, so I am relisting it for deletion. The concern is an apparent lack of notability and an...
Click to read more »November 2012 (UTC) Relist? It seems that editors who have seen this page have little interest in the article one way or the other, so relisting would be advisable...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Comment - Somebody make a call, this is the 4th relisting. Wikipedia:RELIST#Relisting_discussions: "In general debates should not be relisted...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 00:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »Thanks, czar · · 15:06, 11 July 2013 (UTC) Relisting for second week (appears to have had double relist last time) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was no consensus. I do not believe a third relist is likely to get closer to a consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:13, 25 August 2022...
Click to read more »no consensus. I considered relisting again but with two relists proving only one new !vote, I don't see how another relist could have helped here. WP:NPASR...
Click to read more »the Marshall Islands but this was not properly transcluded. Procedural relisting to get this discussion started properly Spartaz Humbug! 18:52, 14 July...
Click to read more »further evaluation of the sources, I agree with Tim Song's call to relist the AfD. The relist did not result in any further discussion, so I'm going to go with...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was no consensus. Since WP:RELIST precludes a third relist, this is pretty much the only option available. No prejudice...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: For what it's worth, I just closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A...
Click to read more »The result of the discussion was: temporarily close beacuse WP:IAR. I'll relist it back on an hour. (non-admin closure) Did you know? Alcremie's 1000th...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Bold final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane...
Click to read more »the AfC category, click to load the page. (Above is a refresh button to relist.) Centre is the browser, this is where the pages load. Top right button...
Click to read more »tried to misinform anybody? As far as I remember, the main problem for this relist was that user:CrazyMartini, a sock, but now readmitted had voted in the...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. North America1000 02:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC) Please add new...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relist one more time to see if we can get a consensus here. Please add...
Click to read more »discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep vote does not assert notability or prove that sources exist. Relist to allow discussion on merge...
Click to read more »logs) 00:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC) Relist comment: After a quick discussion on my talk page I've decided to relist this debate so that these sources can...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Since the discussion only started after the second relist, I'm making an exception and am relisting this discussion...
Click to read more »unaddressed for more than 7 days. Administrative closure without prejudice to relist in case of recreation of an article that addresses the copyright issues...
Click to read more »result was no consensus. This has been on AfD for a month, with 2 relists, so a third relist seems pointless. I'm calling this NC, with no prejudice if somebody...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:39, 10...
Click to read more »not sustained, and there is no clear merger target identified. The last relist looking for that didn't bring on any additional ideas, so it's doubtable...
Click to read more »There was no reason to relist this when it had a clear consensus for delete with zero opposition; I am closing this now per WP:RELIST. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:40...
Click to read more »template's talk page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was Relist at Oct 25. Primefac (talk) 03:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Template:Sporting...
Click to read more »consensus. There's no way to determine consensus with this and I'm not going to relist a third time Valley2city‽ 03:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC) Annelise Manojlovic...
Click to read more »this page. The result was no consensus. While I think that my previous relist has been amply justified by the spirited discussion that followed, I also...
Click to read more »There was no reason to relist this when it had a clear consensus for delete with zero opposition; I am closing this now per WP:RELIST. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:40...
Click to read more »going to relist this, but I ran into the problem described at User talk:Mr.Z-man#closeAFD stopped relisting and bugzilla:61953. Please no-one relist/close...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 00:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: relist #1 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 05:00...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. -- Dane talk 02:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The previous relist seems to have resulted in this AfD getting completely forgotten...
Click to read more »@User:Vanderwaalforces: WP:RELIST says "relisting should not be a substitute for a no consensus closure . . . repeatedly relisting discussions merely in the...
Click to read more »to override the lack of a clear consensus. Having regard to WP:RELIST, a third relist would not be justified. Just Chilling (talk) 13:16, 7 July 2019...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting per nom rationale, this is the only relist I'll do, if there is no more improvement...
Click to read more »Comment I wouldn't be concerned with the relisting. At this point, the AfD could be closed despite the relisting; however, time is not a precious metric...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 06:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 06:21,...
Click to read more »Therefore, this relist is not to be counted as a relist. There may be two more relists after this without comment from the relisting administrator, as...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Still no consensus even after two relists Please add new comments below this notice...
Click to read more »thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Still no consensus even after two relists Please add new comments below this notice...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One last relist, since the first relist garnered no new participation. Please add new...
Click to read more »nature, then the nomination is ineligible for speedy keep. This includes a "relist" result from deletion review, fixing errors in the nomination process, or...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acar. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all the articles that were up for deletion on that AFD. I...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: procedural relist to fix date -- second malformed request Please add new comments...
Click to read more »MICHAEL Q. 03:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Notice to closing admin: Please relist this AfD so it runs for another 5 days. Apparently some users were deterred...
Click to read more »last edit) from http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dyp394. (Relist; OTRS pending. Ticket:2010102510005982) Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:08, 4 November...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:37, 10...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relist to consider a Merge. The last AFD closure was a redirect from...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lord Roem...
Click to read more »stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 20:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 06:28,...
Click to read more »closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 07:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Strong delete drunkcruft...
Click to read more »01:33, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Relisting comment. I gave this nominator's other demo album AFD a third week to I might as well relist this one too. --Ron Ritzman...
Click to read more »decision under appeal was an XfD close, the closer may, at their discretion, relist the page(s) at the relevant XfD. At RfA, if there is no consensus to promote...
Click to read more »stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 20:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 06:31,...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting for a week. If you find reliable sources, now is the time to...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The log of April 1 is overfilled Please add new comments below...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new...
Click to read more »subject | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Techie3 (talk) 10:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) Page consists only of chit-chat...
Click to read more »more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Since nom has been sock-blocked, relist for good-faith comments instead of soft delete...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting again as previous relist yielded no further discussion. Please add new comments...
Click to read more »✗plicit 03:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) * Pppery * it has begun... 22:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC) Draft:Sukchain...
Click to read more »consensus. with WP:NPASR. No further discussion took place despite another relist and as such, it's unclear whether Jclemens' !vote could have changed consensus...
Click to read more »have checked each one of them and specifically, if it is not decided to relist, Delete, except: Keep for "The Coral Gables Elementary School added to the...
Click to read more »vote on these to prevent relisting. Even the relisting editors could throw in a delete or Other opinion and save the relist. Legacypac (talk) 06:53, 15...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Second relist, some discussion needed. Please add new comments below this...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting formally just to give a bit more attention and to let a full...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist Nakon 04:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments below...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Not eligible for Soft Deletion, unfortunately. Please add...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The End.. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all 15 songs that were up for deletion on that AFD. I am...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 20:12, 27...
Click to read more »regular relists as the date stamp on the nomination would otherwise be deceiving as to how much time for discussion there has been. But basically a relist. Monty845...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 01:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 01:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was relist delete and redirect :) Daniel (talk) 11:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Newsround...
Click to read more »listing the article for a Peer review. What if I don't agree with a rating? Relist it as a request or post a note on the project talk page. Aren't the ratings...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist. Note relisting comment below.) --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:40, 14...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The End.. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all 15 songs that were up for deletion on that AFD. I am...
Click to read more »endless discussions by having an RfC last only 31 days, yet participants relist the RfC over and over to attract other editors to review the closed (or...
Click to read more »explain their nomination after being asked and this has had to go to a relist. The nomination says that "the song won four awards". This is a rationale...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acar. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all the articles that were up for deletion on that AFD. I...
Click to read more »—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC) User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After three relists and a lack of discussion, a consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:37, 10...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947( c ) (m) 03:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947(c) (m) 03:16, 4 October...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I'm going to relist this as there has been specific dissent as to the bundling...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Last Relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T)...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Procedural close. Please do not relist old, forgotten AFD discussions without starting from the beginning. It's...
Click to read more »22:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC) Relisting comment: Still no clash, no sense of consensus. With only two participants, relisting seems preferable to a no consensus...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Bold third relist chasing more participation. Please add new comments below...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC) Please...
Click to read more »the discussion was leading to some being kept and some being deleted. Relisting would not help as that would only increase the potential number of conflicting...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 01:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Third relist to allow further input after the most recent !vote and DRV...
Click to read more »more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: (With a nod to the previous relist note) Please add new comments below this notice...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 01:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was no consensus. No consensus after three relists. (non-admin closure) feminist 01:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC) Gold Derby Awards...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »template's talk page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 6. Primefac (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC) Template:Non-free...
Click to read more »doesn't appear to be any actual objection to the PROD and I don't see a relist helping with consensus given AFD volume. Star Mississippi 03:33, 26 February...
Click to read more »Thanks, SoWhy 19:00, 30 July 2017 (UTC) @SoWhy: Do you mind explaining your relist in terms of WP:NOQUORUM? I would have expected this to be treated as a PROD...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 00:56, 19 April 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 12:03, 29...
Click to read more »TfD closure script. I review a TfD, and make a decision as to keep/delete/relist/no-consensus. Give that result to the script, and it does all the boring...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist -- Dane2007 talk 06:52, 4 September 2016 (UTC) Please add new...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One more relist to see if there are more opinions out there. Please add new...
Click to read more »SarahStierch (talk) 08:04, 15 August 2012 (UTC) Users relisting a debate for a third (or further) time, or relisting a debate with a substantial number of commenters...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) TheSandDoctor Talk 01:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC) Unused, blanked project pages...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After three relists and a lack of discussion, consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Third relist because there has been meaningful discussion of the refs since the second relist Please add new comments...
Click to read more »Relisting comment: Relisting a rare 4th time (sorry for this). My close of Delete was challenged at the beginning of January and I agreed to relist it...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: 1st relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:52...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 23:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Asked to relist to provide time to find sources. Please add new comments below...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) buidhe 04:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) bibliomaniac15 05:40, 13 April 2020...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Second relist, some discussion is needed. Please add new comments below this...
Click to read more »more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: (with a note to the previous relist) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks...
Click to read more »result was keep. With no more delete-!votes after rewrites despite three relistings, there seems to be no consensus to delete this after Saqib's rewrite....
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting for at least one more week - the keep arguments have simply pointed...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist to see if we can get a clear consensus Please add new comments...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Bold third relist, noting previous AfD finished no consensus, trying to establish...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was no consensus. Pre-empting the third relist, which is excessive. —Bagumba (talk) 08:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »Equinox | talk 22:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC) Delete as unneeded redirect. Relist on Wikipedia:Redirects_for_deletion. Monkeyman(talk) 23:06, 21 February...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I should note that the Sharq's !vote does not appear to be policy-backed...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 13:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 23:33, 11...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: This discussion was originally and erroneously transcluded to...
Click to read more »meaningless and superfluous category Zeraeph 14:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Relist at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 14:29...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Have decided to relist per Permstrump's work coming after most of the comments...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: 1st relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:51...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Please add...
Click to read more »as a suggestion for other editors/comments after the relist. It wasn't the reason for the relist, which principally was that further participation & discussion...
Click to read more »a Wikipedia list per NLIST/FANCRUFT. I also want to WP:TROUT that relist. The relist followed by an immediate keep !vote should be frowned upon. SportingFlyer...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. There was consensus to delete before the relist, and the only argument since has been rebutted convincingly. Vanamonde (Talk)...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Last relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle...
Click to read more »more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This is the first official relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acar. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all the articles that were up for deletion on that AFD. I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The End.. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all 15 songs that were up for deletion on that AFD. I am...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 08:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 17:19, 25...
Click to read more »clearer consensus. Relisting comment: As the nomination was formatted improperly, please consider this the initial listing rather than a relist. Please add new...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Second relist, more discussion needed. Please add new comments below this...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relist because the nominator has been blocked. Please add new comments...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was delete - despite three relistings this article has not gained any support to be kept and I am persuaded...
Click to read more »this page. The result was no consensus. Second relisting failed to achieve consensus (per WP:RELIST) (non-admin closure) --Darkwind (talk) 22:04, 25...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The End.. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all 15 songs that were up for deletion on that AFD. I am...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c)...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read...
Click to read more »consensus here, one more week's discussion can't hurt. @Sillyfolkboy: Relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation is...
Click to read more »ineligible but zero input and no one contesting the deletion. I see no reason to relist this a 3rd time when there's no indication that's going to change. Star...
Click to read more »Hazama - supporting) 5) Setsuka (Soulcalibur series - main supporting) Relisting once again this is a renomination. Subject only has Cloud as her main...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: A relist seems warranted given a lack of justifications in most editors...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham...
Click to read more »result was no consensus to delete this material after two relists. Per WP:RELIST, a triple-relist is only appropriate in very exceptional circumstances so...
Click to read more »stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 20:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 11:14,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The End.. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all 15 songs that were up for deletion on that AFD. I am...
Click to read more »Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: There's been some talk of pruning this article to make it usable...
Click to read more »who knows? --maru (talk) contribs 17:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC) Overturn and relist. While the keep votes were indeed few and mostly from new users, the deletes...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 18:37, 10...
Click to read more »The result was no consensus defaulting to keep, following Ritchie333's relist suggestion. Some believe the sources are enough to pass, but others don't...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acar. The result of that AFD was to relist all Therefore I am relisting all the articles that were up for deletion on that AFD. I...
Click to read more »(UTC) delete. Two relists and nobody tried to make article better hence really nonnotable. I would suggest to delete after the first relist, if an article/topic...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) * Pppery * it has begun... 04:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC) Usercopy of an...
Click to read more »references. May need to relist this. --Sigma 7 11:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Keep as some of the external links are WP:RS. Relist if necessary. Bearian 19:01...
Click to read more »a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One last attempt at a relist. Lack of votes after another week should probably be...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 talk 00:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC) Please add new comments...
Click to read more »Keep, the notability concerns raised prior to the relist appear to have been addressed by the post-relist argument, which is supported by sources. If these...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as there is currently no consensus here. Please add new comments...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. After two relists, too little participation to establish a deletion consensus for an article...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. Per WP:RELIST, only three relists should occur. (non-admin closure) Presidentman talk · contribs...
Click to read more »is currently listed as completed or declined, it may be necessary to {{relist}} it as pending. Use common sense. If the prior request has been archived...
Click to read more »(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 00:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC) (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 12:03, 29...
Click to read more »template's talk page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 7. Primefac (talk) 17:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC) Template:Citation...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as we have three different options and two different redirect/merge...
Click to read more »I was relisting which provides enough of a consensus, I feel, to support a close rather than a relist because it was already a marginal relist for the...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. As stated, previously PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option...
Click to read more »to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relist because the nominator has been blocked. Please add new comments...
Click to read more »it or assign the issue to someone. What if I don't agree with a rating? Relist it as a request or contact nomen nescio who will handle it or assign the...
Click to read more »generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist, as minimal discussion so far. Please add new comments below...
Click to read more »articles probably need a bit of copy editing. +mt 18:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Relist individually. Some (FEFLOW) have many Google news/scholar/books hits, others...
Click to read more »to come to a consensus to delete this article, but a third relist is prohibited by WP:RELIST. There is therefore no prejudice against immediate renomination...
Click to read more »13:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC) Blue Moon of Kentucky (history · last edit). Relist from the 3rd because the contributor was not notified. Content has been...
Click to read more »this page for deletion before; the result was "Relist in a few weeks if there is no activity. Relist immediately if inappropriate user page activity...
Click to read more »