{{R to talk page}} instead. This redirect page must be outside the user namespace. If this redirect is in the user namespace, then instead of the expected category, it will populate Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace.paragraph. Also, some of the paragraphs are quite long; I suggest reading WP:REDEX and looking for places where the same information can be expressed in fewer...
Click to read more »wikilinks to pick up some of the explanation if needed. Also, read through WP:REDEX to remove redundant words, and remove editorialised words (ex. in "In 1933...
Click to read more »essays, as they'll help tighten your writing when you bring this to FAC. WP:REDEX, User:Tony1/Advanced editing exercises, WP:ELEVAR That's all from me. I'll...
Click to read more »politics", and "Sports and recreation" sections), reduce redundancies (WP:REDEX helps with this) and remove information that is too much detail. Z1720 (talk)...
Click to read more »still use "include" at the end like you haven't mentioned everything. WP:REDEX would be helpful practice here. Why does the reception section discuss the...
Click to read more »be in the file's summary (accessed when someone clicks on the image). WP:REDEX has excellend exercises on how to reduce redundancy in your writing. This...
Click to read more »redundant phrasing that, if removed, would tighten up the language. WP:REDEX has some helpful tips on how to remove these. @The Account 2: I hope this...
Click to read more »the article. Graham Beards (talk) 15:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC) @Chidgk: WP:REDEX is a good starting point for learning to make improvements like Graham's...
Click to read more »sections, consider reading User:Tony1/How to improve your writing and WP:REDEX to help improve the prose. These were excellent in improving my prose when...
Click to read more »died after a crane fell into the work shaft and onto the engineer." See WP:REDEX for exercises for removing redundant words. "not maintaining a capacity...
Click to read more »text that can be spun out or removed as too detailed from the article. WP:REDEX might help, as well as summarising quotes. That's the list. Looking forward...
Click to read more »unsourced prose) I will try to do a copyedit to remove redundant phrases (WP:REDEX helps with this) and suggest sentences that could be removed because they...
Click to read more »Volcanoguy 17:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC) As an aside, I cannot recommend WP:redex enough. Getting rid of redundancy and other needless words can make text...
Click to read more »Queensland 500 Expand : Fahad Al Musalam, Ben Barker (racing driver), Len Lukey, Redex Trials, Klark Quinn, Liam Talbot, NPOV : Adelaide International Raceway...
Click to read more »shortcuts for user essays. See, e.g., WP:CHEESE, WP:RAUL, WP:SPOONFEED, WP:REDEX. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC) I intend to seek deletion...
Click to read more »better advice. Some essays that helped me a bit with copyediting are WP:REDEX, User:Tony1/Advanced editing exercises, and WP:ELEVAR There are some scare...
Click to read more »I notice lots of extra words that can be removed. I suggest reading WP:REDEX as this will help with trimming. A large example is the use of "however"...
Click to read more »me to UNRRA, 1944–1945. In general, I suggest reading and completing WP:REDEX as there are lots of ways to reduce the amount of prose in the article....
Click to read more »was tasked to succeed" - "Gill succeeded". You may want to check out WP:REDEX for some ideas about removing superfluous words/phrases from your writing...
Click to read more »unnecessarily clunking phrasing; I would highly recommend looking over WP:REDEX and WP:POSA, as I have found them both tremendously helpful in improving...
Click to read more »Brick Intelligent SQL NO IMPORT - insubstantial Redcode NO IMPORT- jargon redex NO IMPORT - insubstantial Red Hat DONE RediLisp NO IMPORT - insubstantial...
Click to read more »looking for an essay that might help a little with copyediting, maybe WP:REDEX would be useful? "penetrating other creatures is the only way it can receive...
Click to read more »turtles evoke electrical signals? Again, unnecessary use of both (see WP:REDEX). Sentence might be further condensed by saying: The sea turtle loggerhead...
Click to read more »turtles evoke electrical signals? Again, unnecessary use of both (see WP:REDEX). Sentence might be further condensed by saying: The sea turtle loggerhead...
Click to read more »See the following: WP:CRS, Fuchs' guide, Tony's guide, Andy's guide, WP:REDEX. I'm certain there's more. Read FAs similar to the one you're trying to...
Click to read more »redundancies, summarising words more effectively, redundant phrasing (WP:REDEX will help) and spinning out information that is too detailed. If this is...
Click to read more »Prix 1964 Rand Grand Prix 1965 Rand Grand Prix RedeX Trophy 1953 RedeX Trophy + 1954 RedeX Trophy 1955 RedeX Trophy Reims Grand Prix (redirects to Reims-Gueux)...
Click to read more »recommend the following essays if you need some additional assistance: WP:REDEX, WP:ELEVAR Will do a reference spotcheck sometime tomorrow. I guess you...
Click to read more »and the like. If copyediting isn't your forte, I recommend the essays WP:REDEX, User:Tony1/Spot the ambiguity, and WP:ELEVAR—they'll help you weed out...
Click to read more »Queensland 500 Expand : Fahad Al Musalam, Ben Barker (racing driver), Len Lukey, Redex Trials, Klark Quinn, Liam Talbot, NPOV : Adelaide International Raceway...
Click to read more »text that can be spun out or removed as too detailed from the article. WP:REDEX might help, as well as summarising quotes. That's the list. Looking forward...
Click to read more »which impacts the flow and impact of the article. I cannot recommend WP:REDEX (and Tony's other exercises) enough for improving one's prose. Learning...
Click to read more »and the like. If copyediting isn't your forte, I recommend the essays WP:REDEX, User:Tony1/Spot the ambiguity, and WP:ELEVAR—they'll help you weed out...
Click to read more »I'll stop there for now, but I would highly recommend going through WP:REDEX and implementing its advice on the rest of the article as well as the above...
Click to read more »redundancies, summarising words more effectively, redundant phrasing (WP:REDEX will help) and spinning out information that is too detailed. If this is...
Click to read more »Volcanoguy 17:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC) As an aside, I cannot recommend WP:redex enough. Getting rid of redundancy and other needless words can make text...
Click to read more »the article. Graham Beards (talk) 15:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC) @Chidgk: WP:REDEX is a good starting point for learning to make improvements like Graham's...
Click to read more »See the following: WP:CRS, Fuchs' guide, Tony's guide, Andy's guide, WP:REDEX. I'm certain there's more. Read FAs similar to the one you're trying to...
Click to read more »recommend the following essays if you need some additional assistance: WP:REDEX, WP:ELEVAR Will do a reference spotcheck sometime tomorrow. I guess you...
Click to read more »politics", and "Sports and recreation" sections), reduce redundancies (WP:REDEX helps with this) and remove information that is too much detail. Z1720 (talk)...
Click to read more »unsourced prose) I will try to do a copyedit to remove redundant phrases (WP:REDEX helps with this) and suggest sentences that could be removed because they...
Click to read more »was tasked to succeed" - "Gill succeeded". You may want to check out WP:REDEX for some ideas about removing superfluous words/phrases from your writing...
Click to read more »I'll stop there for now, but I would highly recommend going through WP:REDEX and implementing its advice on the rest of the article as well as the above...
Click to read more »unnecessarily clunking phrasing; I would highly recommend looking over WP:REDEX and WP:POSA, as I have found them both tremendously helpful in improving...
Click to read more »which impacts the flow and impact of the article. I cannot recommend WP:REDEX (and Tony's other exercises) enough for improving one's prose. Learning...
Click to read more »