desk with reference desk guidelines. Shortcuts WP:SOAPWP:SOAP WP:PROMOWP:PROMO WP:AGENDAWP:AGENDA Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle...
Click to read more »Discography (Single, Maxi, Album, Promo CDs) was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page...
Click to read more »Pussyfoot Promo was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hard Candy Promo Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Is a promo tour for an album...
Click to read more »January 2009 (UTC) Promo 1999 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Promo record likely released...
Click to read more »result was delete. Stifle (talk) 14:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC) Womanizer Promo Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This article is not notable. Artists ALWAYS go on promo "tours", and promo "tours" are never notable because all the are are short performances...
Click to read more »this page. The result was delete. Sandstein 05:38, 27 April 2012 (UTC) Promo Only (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »promo-code-land.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »for this article: Articles for deletion/Gone Postal's 2008 Promo Gone Postal's 2008 Promo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link promo-sneakers.com; 0 records. promo-sneakers.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr...
Click to read more »was delete. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Don't Tell Me Promo Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »views) Contested PROD. Promo EP with no sources nor assertion of notability. According to WP:MUSIC, "Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link mmsl-promo.com; 0 records. mmsl-promo.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...
Click to read more »promo-seo.co.uk: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »closure) Pcap ping 01:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC) List of Britney Spears promo tours (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Music Promo Today (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »promo.stormgain.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »Delete All --JForget 00:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC) Jonas Brothers Fall 2005 Promo Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »hostgator-promo-codes.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »vgo-csgo-promo-codes.webnode.sk: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki •...
Click to read more »this page. The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC) Promo 2007 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »Pentagram (Gorgoroth album). Spartaz Humbug! 05:28, 19 June 2010 (UTC) Promo '94 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Promo Direct (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »Articles for deletion/Hard Candy Promo Tour Articles for deletion/Hard Candy Promo Tour (2nd nomination) Hard Candy Promo Tour (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) This username matched "official" on...
Click to read more »promo.stormgain.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »was no consensus. Scott Mac (Doc) 13:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Alexia Radio Promo CDs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »promo-ocu.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) This username matched "official" on...
Click to read more »admin including myself.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC) Promo Tape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »kursusseobandung.promo: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »CBS#Logos_and_slogans. Black Kite 17:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC) Reach for the Stars (CBS promo) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »promo.warnermusic.com.br: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »genesis-mining-promo-code-2018.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki...
Click to read more »its scheduled movie in primetime. There was this musical promo to go with it. The musical promo sounded a bit jazzy. Toward the end of it, there was the...
Click to read more »Tour. — xaosflux Talk 02:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC) User:Jwad/Don't Tell Me Promo Tour (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (Time stamp for bot...
Click to read more »besty-promo.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more » The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC) Promo (Flight Only) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »site is blatant promo; WP:PROMO everywhere: Blatant promo for International Art Deco Congress; Promo link to Red Carpet Charters; Promo link to Trailways...
Click to read more »OFF BABY BAM RECORDS J1 PROMO 2008/10/04 23:03 BUFF 1 BEAT THE SPEAKERS UP A SIDE WORLDWIDE - SPECTRE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP J1 PROMO 2008/10/04 23:06 TOP CHOICE...
Click to read more »evasion. WP:NOTHERE 2 promo only ducks, plus another promo SPA account predating not listed 2 accounts created 1 day after promo only COI blocked User:Vanditrecords...
Click to read more »per WP:PROMO. Globalnewswire and financeYahoo are the press releases. Worldsolarpower (talk) 07:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Delete: as per WP:PROMO Tatupiplu'talk...
Click to read more »17:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC) Promo CDs not notable, and cannot be verified to be complete. Most music publications have promo versons distributed beforehand...
Click to read more »Rest of it is self promo. In both cases, old revisions of articles and self promo are not allowed per Wikipedia:UPCOPIES and WP:UP#PROMO. Therefore, this...
Click to read more »also is missing many reliable sources. "List of Endorsements" violates WP:PROMO and is just a means of advertising. If Michael Phelps earns $45 million...
Click to read more »does not contain any reliable sources. "List of Endorsements" violates WP:PROMO and is just a means of advertising. If Michael Phelps earns $45 million...
Click to read more »republikatm.ph/promo-astig-tawag-20. * Links added in this diff: republikatm.ph/promo-astigtxt-10 (31, 19, 18, 2) republikatm.ph/promo-sulitxt-5 (31,...
Click to read more »Your logic that open source software is not subject to PROMO is absurd, and we deal with PROMO every day on the crypto articles that I follow. You have...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Promo Disk 2005 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »combined with promo only (recent) editors. The Wired source indicates some notability but either WP:TOOSOON and combined with recent promo only editors...
Click to read more »information in the first place. This article is not only written sounding like promo, but I think the most likely reason someone would make an article like this...
Click to read more »an article dealing with the album's promotion in general, including this promo tour. I must also remind the "merge and delete" voters above that their...
Click to read more »Kick The Raven: band promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:09, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC) Delete. Promo for a non-notable garage band. — Gwalla | Talk 03:03, 18 Aug 2004...
Click to read more »2015 continued promo editing on John Basedow, and WP:OWN / against consensus [2] final warning [3] continued to promo edit Disruptive promo POV pushing against...
Click to read more »result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 20:19, 1 May 2005 (UTC) This is a promo, copied verbatim from other webpages. Opie 01:45, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) NOTE:...
Click to read more »articles on Wikipedia. If so, please enjoy your stay, but first read WP:PROMO and WP:Your first article." - Dank (push to talk) 17:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »They range from a sentence to a paragraph and generally fall under WP:PROMO without any actual independent examination of the subject beyond "hey, this...
Click to read more »on Wiki, I was directed here. My question is: I'm holding a not for sale promo version of the album mentioned above. On MORBID RECORDS, not on Neoblast...
Click to read more »WP:PROMO, WP:AD. This adds very little over what is already at the main article The Muppet Show except for the WP:PROMO. I have removed the PROMO under...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete the important word in GNG is significant, even if the promo has received significant coverage (which at this time it hasn't) then the...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Should be a redirect. Only primary sources, and simply a promo for the subsidiary. Onel5969 TT me 02:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC) Redirect to...
Click to read more »wm_id=25&sub_id=1&site_id=1&promo_id=39. * Links added in this diff: www.doktordick.com/index.php?wm_id=25&sub_id=1&site_id=1&promo_id=39 (1, 16, 1, 1) 2009-01-28...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC) delete Nowhere near WP:GNG. Promo, promo, promo. Ode+Joy (talk) 10:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC) Delete, just delete...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:PROMO article that just lists the company's products and relies for references...
Click to read more »3 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, promo - a company of one. Megan1967 09:29, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, Promo, not real company 1138 08:29, 3 Apr 2005...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Original PROD tag: WP:PROMO & no independent sourcing. Tagged for notability since 2008; has been a...
Click to read more »own media releases, albeit in other publications. In my view breached WP:PROMO NealeWellington (talk) 10:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC) Delete as non-notable. Rubbish...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Article is found to be in violation of WP:PROMO, and is deemed unfit for inclusion in this encyclopedia. Articles created...
Click to read more »article: [5]: Redirecting to home search results page. [6]: promo. [7]: Promo. [8]: promo. Lots of promo, but nothing with IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject...
Click to read more »copyedited it to make it less promo, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC) Not seeing autobio but it was definitely promo, hopefully better now...
Click to read more »basically nothing there, fails WP:PROMO, WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:35, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:PROMO and would require a complete WP:TNT...
Click to read more »here? [5] is promo by the label ("'Southpawers' was created ... to support Shady Records’ artists" [9]), [7] is merely a duplicate of the promo [5] via aggregator...
Click to read more »a promo single - but Lift isn't, despite receiving a music video - is this correct? Again, I'm unsure exactly about what counts as a single or promo single...
Click to read more »promotion (see WP:PROMO). Bakazaka (talk) 18:59, 19 October 2018 (UTC) Delete, not notable; trivial and clear promo article. WP:PROMO and WP:NOTNEWS apply...
Click to read more »and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC) Delete - WP:PROMO with multiple WP:EL. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:56,...
Click to read more »early. Fails WP:GNG, a clear case of WP:PROMO. Jack N. Stock (talk) 03:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails PROMO, GNG and COI. I'm fine with the one-line...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was keep. If the article has long term promo issue, that is dealt with in different ways than deletion here. KTC (talk)...
Click to read more »believe that this article meets the WP:BIO criteria and it appears to be a WP:PROMO. I have been unable to find any reliable sources suggesting otherwise. Most...
Click to read more »blocked for spam. The whole article smells promo with no sources. The article of his son Sarosh Khan is also just promo and the proposed deletion message was...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Purely WP:PROMO, Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Having no encyclopedic value in the first place. Hence...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) User:Altaf ahmed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Promo-only user page with also addresses and phone numbers mentioned, out of scope...
Click to read more »image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, likely should be tagged non-free promo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC) Image:L_487109.jpg...
Click to read more »| history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: promoffer2u.com/promo/?s=klcc&cat=0&sa=Search (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2011-06-15 23:34:37 (UTC):...
Click to read more »edit. User:Serwertje was created first day after level 4 warning on WP:PROMO at User talk:Mattijsmattijs, and User:Nul65 second day, and User:Zero foundation...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROMO Viztor (talk) 03:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No RS to establish N for this PROMO bio. The book is self published by "Coleman Studios" and only held in 8...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) End-to-end WP:PROMO. Improperly sourced, lacks WP:RS. Fails WP:NCORP. Hence, calling for an...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROMO, do not see enough to meet BIO or any of its subsections John from Idegon...
Click to read more »TonyBallioni (talk) 03:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NCORP and WP:PROMO. Insignificant reliable coverage of the subject. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro...
Click to read more »April 2023 (UTC) Delete: Fails GNG and WP:RPRGM. Sources in the article are promo and about other toics where the subject is mentioned. Nothing with SIGCOV...
Click to read more »(non-admin closure) Bobherry Talk Edits 16:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC) Draft:The promo codes 2017 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Not at all an...
Click to read more »fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Extremely limited promo release only. In fact can barely be called a promo released as it was given away free with a book...
Click to read more »discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO. This content belongs on the company's web site, not here, i.e. this language:...
Click to read more »reliable independent media coverage provided, only routine mentions serving as promo-CV page. Remove as non-notable PR profile Jørgen Rü (talk) 11:47, 10 August...
Click to read more »artist is signed with Carhartt 4 N promo interview, just an open platform for the artist 5 N press release 6 N promo interview, and in-house 7 N listing...
Click to read more »but this person gets only 19 Google hits, and the article reads like a promo, possible a copyvio (although nothing turns up on the internet). Improperly...
Click to read more »(UTC) User:MPH007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Corporate promo hiding on a user page. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC) Remove...
Click to read more »policies or guidelines. The delete !vote on the basis of lack of notability (PROMO concerns are a bit vaguely stated) carries the day here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG, WP:CORP, and WP:PROMO. Please see discussion at Talk:Train2Game#More sources needed. Note: I am...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP and agree also seems like a WP:PROMO. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 04:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:PROMO. Fabiobengario (talk) 18:00, 27 April 2022...
Click to read more »in violation of coi, paid thus it falls into what I term not-overtly-promo promo. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Keep. COI is not a...
Click to read more »discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Delete -- WP:PROMO on an unremarkable organisation. Nothing encyclopedically relevant here...
Click to read more »after adding not the requested reliable sources but more advertising and promo. The Banner talk 11:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Delete — a promo piece citing as its sources... more promo pieces. No indication of notability; fails WP:GNG with...
Click to read more »| watch | logs) WP:UP#PROMO, WP:SOCK..same user as UTTAM KUMAR GOUDA (talk · contribs). no constructive edits, just self promo on userpages Gtwfan52 (talk)...
Click to read more »| history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: promoffer2u.com/promo/?s=klcc&cat=0&sa=Search (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2011-06-15 23:34:37 (UTC):...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A half-hearted promotional attempt WP:PROMO. Calling for an AfD discussion. Hatchens (talk) 15:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.shopwithsave.com/bookmyshow-promo-codes-hyderabad/BookMySow (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2021-01-08 06:07:46 (UTC):...
Click to read more »WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:MUSICBIO. No charted songs or awards, and the usual promos and track listings. I located a number of short bios, though only one was...
Click to read more »22:25, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) Promo of "THE bassist of the European Improv and Free Jazz scene." Presumably vanity in addition to promo. Tempshill 23:35, 18 Apr...
Click to read more »standalone programme. Chris talk back 22:30, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, it was a promo that lasted two years, not encyclopedic--nixie 23:17, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Article about a future HBO series. Main purpose appears to be promotional (WP:PROMO). Lacks WP:SIGCOV. At best, WP:TOOSOON. Geoff | Who, me? 12:03, 16 September...
Click to read more »investigation into her work, I find significant, because it's anything but PROMO. See: https://abc7news.com/archive/5831969/ https://web.archive...
Click to read more »to:a b c d e f "2017 Manufacturer Xgc88000 Crawler Crane with 3c". Made-in-China. Promo 4. ^ "XCMG XGC88000 crane - load chart, specs (2021 - 2023)". Lectura Specs...
Click to read more »• Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC) Delete It's a non-notable promo Cartoon Network made from already existing Scooby-Doo footage with a thin...
Click to read more »Mr. Whelan. Sumsum2010·T·C 19:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Delete Blatant promo article written by his company's PR person (who has also been notified of...
Click to read more »site, band promo site, a trivial resume mention, personal promo site, band promo site, directory info, directory info, CD Baby promo, band promo, and a blog...
Click to read more »pass criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. The article is promotional WP:PROMO and may be a WP:COI effort. A BEFORE search reveals only social media. Netherzone...
Click to read more »that does not demonstrate any notability. The "I got 2 babe" network ID promo receives mostly trivial mentions in one or two independent sources of varying...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete WP:PROMO for a non-notable press agent. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC) Strong Delete Clear case of WP:PROMO. Nothing else to...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.shopwithsave.com/bookmyshow-promo-codes-hyderabad/BookMySow (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2021-01-08 06:07:46 (UTC):...
Click to read more »WP:NOTRESUME/WP:PROMO. Unless participation in these specific pageants listed or founding a medical startup that is tagged with COI and is very WP:PROMO (also WP:MULTSOURCES)...
Click to read more »Nikki♥311 20:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC) Delete all, we're not talking about a promo from 50 years ago that lasted a couple of decades, we're talking about something...
Click to read more »(Musician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:FAKEARTICLE/WP:PROMO. Articles are clearly promotional in nature: these subjects would almost...
Click to read more »meets WP:NCOMPANY. The notability notice should also be removed. The WP:PROMO issues, IMO can be fixed with a quick rewrite. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 03:32...
Click to read more »Z-mantalk¢ 18:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Delete... but it isn't a hoax. It's a promo acetate, basically a CD-R made by the studio in very limited quantities...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Purely WP:PROMO with no secondary sourcing. BEFORE shows existence but not notability. Slywriter...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails notability per WP:SONGS. Promo release only, no official single release, no significant chart placings...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A WP:PROMO article on an unremarkable fintech startup. Significant RS coverage cannot...
Click to read more »university "news" sites promo-ing on-campus events (regardless of the "independence" of the organising committee). Blatant NN promo which has no place here...
Click to read more »Fails WP:GNG and has clearly breached WP:NPOV. It has been written as WP:PROMO. Abishe (talk) 03:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Delete, not notable, blog promo. Megan1967 09:58, 27 May 2005 (UTC) Delete vanity--Sophitus 10:29, May 27, 2005 (UTC) Delete. Promo. No relevant Google hits...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 02:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:Corp, Reads like a promo piece. Kierzek (talk) 13:07,...
Click to read more »Richa Novisha" . KapanLagi.com (in Indonesian) . Retrieved April 4, 2023 . Promo "10 Portraits of Ageless Richa Novisha, Already 34 Years Old" :: 3. ^ Times...
Click to read more »because of three things - Article is for a Single/Song, Article is for a "promo CD Single", Article is for a "Digital download". Yes the artist is notable...
Click to read more »1st nomination was in 2007; the few folks who !voted, noted then this was PROMO but found it notable. Article was created by a SPA (Special:Contributions/Mbeach14)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORG. Also quite PROMO John from Idegon (talk) 22:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Delete - does not meet...
Click to read more »we have: [1] - appears to be a promo interview [2] - again, looks like promo [3] - is this website reliable? [4] - promo interview [5] - Rashan Allen is...
Click to read more ». (promo content) Steve Klosk was appointed CEO, while remaining President... (non notable CEO) To broaden their biocatalysis platform... (promo language)...
Click to read more »of its rarity. Mike Tenay and Don West both made comments about this in promos for Jeff Jarret and Kurt Angles rematch and during Angles entrance if that...
Click to read more »15:38, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC) Delee, not notable, POV promo. Megan1967 23:43, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete: promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:30, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:PROMO for non-notable company HouseOfChange (talk) 16:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete. Obvious promo. The Arabic is not tagged as {{lang-ae}} and all the references are to the company and business etc. Obviously WP:PROMO and WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC) File:Dark-yawa-promo-shot-no-logo-smal.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG promo content Impeeriumalo (talk) 07:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo-PR-spam.Non-notable entity. Winged BladesGodric 14:56, 26 December 2017...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:PROMO. Possible WP:UPE/WP:COI. Created in support of an ongoing AfD of the director's...
Click to read more »Delete – Quadell (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2013 (UTC) File:Dog Gone - Family Guy promo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GageSkidmore...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) BLP with WP:V issues (fails verification, misleading sentences, promo), and several of the sources are interviews or his page so not fully independent...
Click to read more »notable per WP:ORG, also WP:PROMO and poorly sourced. Alex discussion ★ 19:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC) Delete, speedyable as Promo. -Nat Gertler (talk) 20:41...
Click to read more »images as own work. some of these images are watermarked, some look like promo photos. some might be legit. but i think there's enough question about provenance...
Click to read more »Health (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Seems like a promo, not enough suspicion of a promo for me to tag for G11. Unlikely to ever become an article...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo and non notable. I had it marked for speedy A7 and promo, but another editor removed the tag.John from...
Click to read more »Delete, poorly written promo piece; fails GNG and WP:Corp. Kierzek (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:PROMO and WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU...
Click to read more »for promotional purposes, and are deleteable at WP:MFD, or as per WP:CSD#G11, {{db-promo}}, if blatant. Wikipedia:No one cares about your garage band...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG, WP:CORP, and WP:PROMO. Please see discussion at Talk:Train2Game#More sources needed. Note: I am...
Click to read more »(diff - undo) - Link: www.ardorband.com/promo-photo-1-small.jpg. * Links added in this diff: www.ardorband.com/promo-photo-1-small.jpg (12, 9, 9, 1) 2009-08-04...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced promo. Doubt about notability as I can find few independent sources (with regards:...
Click to read more »hey! 07:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Delete - Not notable. Part of a series of promo articles all cross linked. None, that I have found, have any sort of substantial...
Click to read more »Adam9007 (talk) 01:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC) Speedy Delete G11 promo page under promo username. Clear cut case as any. Legacypac (talk) 07:12, 2 February...
Click to read more »protect from COI and PROMO, because it's a fixed IP (no collateral damage), long-term single purpose account, continuously pushing promo at Helena Christensen(inserting...
Click to read more »Charleston City Paper: (Duplicate) SoulTracks: WP:PROMO SoulTracks: WP:PROMO SoulTracks: WP:PROMO JazzBites: Playlist log. WP:TRIVIALMENTION OnlineRadioBox:...
Click to read more »notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:41, 4 March 2017 (UTC) Delete, promo piece, without notability; per WP:Corp. Kierzek (talk) 14:34, 4 March 2017...
Click to read more »Speedy delete – Non-notable, self-promo, still speedy deleted some hours ago as Hamoussin fouad adan. Crosswiki self-promo. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:54, 24 July 2017...
Click to read more »Zurich Premiership. Thryduulf 17:24, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete, website promo, no content. Megan1967 04:02, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) Merge, then Speedy Delete...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Promo release only. Pointless article with no references, the information can...
Click to read more »tangled promo-fest. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 14:39, 25 March 2011 (UTC) Delete Looks promotional and non-notable. I share the feelings about the 'promo-fest'...
Click to read more »-- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC) Speedy Delete Per {{db-promo}} which states "Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to...
Click to read more »User:Hubhopperofficial/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Promo draft created by an editor now blocked for a username violation. Duplicate...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Limited promo release only, never an official single. Poor article largely of unreferenced...
Click to read more »which qualifies him for WP:GNG. It could also be a potential case of WP:PROMO. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »biography it seems that everything is just a bit polished up. Concern 2 = promo pushing Concern 3 = sock puppets. Main author is under investigation for...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: inrdeals.com/signup?promo=PRAD17T (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2017-10-21 11:23:16 (UTC): User...
Click to read more »and advertorial-style "look at this new make-I've been sponsored to wear" promo pieces. The general notability guideline requires significant coverage in...
Click to read more »Looks like promo. I say VfD, unless someone says otherwise in the next 48 hours or so. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:49, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC) Looks like promo. I'd say...
Click to read more »22 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 07:32, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, non-notable, promo/ad. Now I've seen everything. Wiffle as a...
Click to read more »| uploads | upload log). The file being used by the uploader is from a promo unofficial CD cover, which the uploader cannot even provide a source for...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Promo user sandbox, g11 declined as not promo. Lavalizard101 (talk) 09:18, 21 August 2025 (UTC) delete...
Click to read more »SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 28 November 2015 (UTC) Weak Delete blatant promo (-1) WP:NOTPROMO together with borderline notability WP:GNG WP:CORP WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »of the IP. Also a SPA Max556 who post promo material that is reverted. Mostly IPs that contribute (with promo stuff). ArcticDragonfly (talk) 11:42, 6...
Click to read more »debate was delete. CDC (talk) 22:08, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) Appears to be a vanity promo. Check out the homepage; it's hosted on myspace.com. Emiao 01:47, 21 May...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable person, promo, failing WP:GNG The Banner talk 00:50, 12 November 2016 (UTC) Delete. WP:PROMO pure and simple. Zero WP:RS sources...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:07, 5 August 2019 (UTC) Delete. Old unsupported PROMO article (part of a larger PROMO garden created by SPA and blocked sock acct), all OR, ORPHAN...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete press release WP:PROMO junk fest. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 04:47, 26 February 2026 (UTC) * Delete promo promo Yesterday, all my dreams......
Click to read more »jsp?tsk=59516M&pc=24433M&keycode=59516M&promocode=24433M&promo_key=24433M (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2018-05-29 09:56:19 (UTC): User Rana1 Mohamed...
Click to read more »to create a promo article on Al Khalafalla. The article was later speedily deleted and the user blocked for their attempts to place a promo article. On...
Click to read more »published has been trying to add promo edits here, then after being warned CassidyJo410 popped up to add very similar promo here, then after warning Fortin410...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo piece on a non-notable musician, fails WP:MUSICBIO. The sources look plentiful...
Click to read more »chapters. DGG ( talk ) 20:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC) Delete The same old WP:PROMO story: the independent sources aren't significant and the significant sources...
Click to read more »a promo single - but Lift isn't, despite receiving a music video - is this correct? Again, I'm unsure exactly about what counts as a single or promo single...
Click to read more »published song. Fails GNG and NSONG. Sources are mentions in promo. Source eval: Promo tour annoucement, mentions subject, not SIGCOV :: Kennelty, Greg...
Click to read more »Jytdog (talk) 22:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:GNG, WP:CORP and WP:PROMO, no actual references, just a list of people who work there. Joseph2302...
Click to read more »the promo disgusting puff text. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Article is now a tiny stub with all the unsourced boring promo removed...
Click to read more »article seems to be written as a promo and many of the references seem to be sourced from the individual itself. Fails WP:PROMO . An example of what is stated...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Too much promo for it to be on Wikipedia. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »tag listed at bottom of article. promo for a non notable band. JamesBurns 08:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC) Delete, nn band promo. --TheMidnighters 09:05, 12 July...
Click to read more »Source eval: Promo :: 1. "Shyamambaram Serial Zee Keralam Starring Haritha G Nair, Rahul Ramachandran in Lead". Kerala TV. Coming soon type promo :: 2. ^ "പ്രേക്ഷകർക്ക്...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:Notability WP:PROMO Jamesharrison2014 (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC) Automated comment:...
Click to read more »WP:NPOL. Article was created in campaign preceding upcoming election, WP:PROMO applies. Cabayi (talk) 09:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »respond. —Kusma (t·c) 05:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC) delete PROMO and aggressively protected PROMO at that. Jytdog (talk) 07:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. WP:PROMO. UPE. Refs are PR, press-releases and profiles. No real secondary coverage...
Click to read more »User:Captnshaw (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Promo WP:FAKEARTICLE from promo only editor. WP:NOTHOWTO duffbeerforme (talk) 07:18, 9 October...
Click to read more »10:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC) Speedy Delete Promotional article likely by a promo only account - CSD tagged as such. The article does not make a claim of...
Click to read more »Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour. Same promo name, same promo edits. Praxidicae (talk) 12:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC) Accused parties...
Click to read more »evidence: Coordination of editing on Draft:Mark Antony Rossi (and promo on Mary Spio) Promo only accounts no edit summaries undisclosed COI (one claims copyright...
Click to read more »sockpuppeting activities To my opinion, this is selfpromo/orchestrated promo by multiple people The Banner talk 14:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »del. promo. notability. Mikkalai 00:18, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete self-promotion. —Seselwa 05:50, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, website promo. Megan1967...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails notability per WP:SONGS. Promo release only, no significant chart placing Paul75 (talk) 07:16, 16 February...
Click to read more »www.test-telemovel.com/player/?ncode=6a020dff6e0a1fa754f750d565e8ad5f&id_promo=51 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2012-02-01 03:18:20 (UTC): w:pt:User:2.80.227.128...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) This article has notability issues, and slightly promo. I vote delete. Dengero (talk) 09:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »of WP:PROMO. A review of the sources and the result is rather clear: Refs 4, 7, 12, 14, 18, 19, 21, 23, 26 are unreliable, non-secondary, promo sources...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete- Agree with nominator WP:PROMO fails WP:BIO. FITINDIA 05:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC) Delete. Poor promo piece. At least hire a more professional...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo for local conference, fails WP:GNG. Looks like a promo vehicle for sponsors. The Banner talk 19:12,...
Click to read more »Delete. Woohookitty(cat scratches) 11:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Hi - this is a promo article. Rama's Arrow 03:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per above George...
Click to read more »issues. The only promo here is the notability claims - awards, etc. The problem is that this is a largely unsourced BLP, not that it's promo, let alone unambiguous...
Click to read more »station that in itself barely exists in The Netherlands, subject of heavy promo pushing and vandalism, steered and directed by the radio station itself...
Click to read more »promotional editing and was blocked for violations of username policy and for promo editing. CAPSasia requested the username mission5 and an unblock. While...
Click to read more »and was going to nominate it myself. It could go under the CSD for promo under a promo user name. Legacypac (talk) 15:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »21:58, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete: promo, no evidence of notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 08:58, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete. promo, unverifiable, not notable, etc...
Click to read more »of WP:PROMO written using AI, two things Wikipedia sees as a no-no. Hansen Sebastian (Talk) 15:21, 30 November 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO Agnieszka653...
Click to read more »wondering if anyone might know the song that is played on the Season 4(T4) promo video for Dexter on FOX in Portugal? The advert has been playing for the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Badly written promo piece The Banner talk 19:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC) Delete it --Hooperbloob...
Click to read more »promo Source 2 is routine entertainment news that summarises the launch promo Source 3 is routine entertainment news that summarises the launch promo...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:TOOSOON and WP:PROMO. The album has not been released yet, and there is a lack of significant...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability. WP:PROMO Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo written (possibly PR company rep from name) article about singer whose notability...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:46, 25 September 2022 (UTC) Delete as being a violation of WP:PROMO (i'd even wonder if WP:CSD#G11 could apply here). The article author may...
Click to read more »copyrighted promo in edits [2], [3], [4]. Both accounts have many warnings about blanking referenced content and inserting identical unsourced promo in "Rankings"...
Click to read more »on this for a while, and I've seen SPAs and spam-blocked users tacking promo onto it. Finally got a chance to look at the sources in depth, and it's...
Click to read more »only ever here for PROMO reasons, and this title (LOVE EDITS) is the same title of one of his deleted pages (thus it is also PROMO ish). ♠PMC♠ (talk)...
Click to read more »result was Delete --JForget 00:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC) Buffyverse rare promos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »notability, and I'm unsure if it's the same person. The article now is very PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 01:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC) Are you seriously confused if...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Article is found to be in violation of WP:PROMO, and is deemed unfit for inclusion in this encyclopedia. Articles created...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) poorly sourced promo The Banner talk 21:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC) Delete Not sure that it's promo, but the individual still does not...
Click to read more »TWL) Contested PROD. Original reasoning was (and still is) Unremarkable promo that doesn't fit any CSD criteria. The PROD tag was sitting on the article...
Click to read more »to notability does not confer notability. The page also has a strong WP:PROMO feel. KidAd talk 05:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Delete most likely a WP:PROMO. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC) Delete sounds like a WP:PROMO 9H48F (talk) 13:37, 12 April 2019...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:PROMO. There are hits in RS (e.g., [1], [2], [3]), but not WP:SIGCOV. Tagged for...
Click to read more »12:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC) Delete does not meet WP:GNG written as WP:PROMO and lacks real WP:CS --EC Racing (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NTV. BEFORE revealed promo pieces and database style entries. Nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV that addresses...
Click to read more »Non-notable single, only released as promo, no RS ukexpat (talk) 00:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC) Delete Just a promo single, didn't receive any media attention...
Click to read more »or WP:Music. It is a promo piece written by an "official" editor. While no longer purely G11, now, it remains promotional. promo puff piece for subject...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo for an organisation of dubious notability, unsourced self-serving claims...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails notability per WP:SONGS. Promo/radio release only in extremely limited markets. An album track only, never...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo, partly copyvio of http://travelerscenturyclub.org/countries-and-territ...
Click to read more »museum that lacks notability and sources independent of the org. It’s mainly promo material SVUKnight (talk) 04:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »(93362) to Godaddy promo code (edit | [[:|talk]] | history | links | watch | logs) (diff - DELETED) - Link: jofrati.net/Business/godaddy-promo-code-coupon-verified-2015/...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was move to Draft:La Gata (2014 telenovela). A promo having aired is not a notability criterion. That said, given that it's airing...
Click to read more »is by a "brand contributor" and is not under Forbes editorial control (promo). The Startup Reporter is a site where startups can set up their own web...
Click to read more »20:43, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 01:55, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, promo of run-of-the-mill fansite. Just like any other...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV, let alone WP:NCORP. Did a WP:BEFORE check and only fund more promo/passing sources from CrunchBase/Forbes ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:21...
Click to read more »(View log) del promo of a nonnotable self-published book by an unknown author. It sucks, by the way (judging from preview pages at its promo website). `'mikka...
Click to read more »this actress are pretty useless, as far as I can tell - promo listings, fluff pieces and one promo interview. Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR. Elmidae...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Speedy delete as {{Db-promo}}. Already tagged. TimothyJosephWood 14:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC) {{Db-promo}} is a complete free and easy-to-use...
Click to read more »August 2018 (UTC) Delete as unambiguous WP:PROMO. Bakazaka (talk) 00:37, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Delete as WP:PROMO and failing to meet WP:GNG. Each of the...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. promo for non-notable, will recreate as redirect Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:23...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article has been written as WP:PROMO and fails to comply with WP:NPOV. Abishe (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) Delete It is an unreleased promo, it cannot possibly satisfy WP:MUSIC requirements, ... promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, promo The Banner talk 21:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC) Delete as seems more promo than anything, No evidence of notability...
Click to read more »Delete (probably speediable, but happy to let the AfD run its course); promo piece (possibly self-written) on a non-notable author; the sources don't...
Click to read more »February 2022 (UTC) Delete I would have marked as speedy delete. Blatant WP:PROMO. LibStar (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Delete because it looks like...
Click to read more »third-party sources, and too much bias and promo. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC) Delete Obvious delete. WP:PROMO WP:GNG WP:RS. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:28...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) I went in planning on cleaning up the puffery, resume, and promo cruft from this autobiography, but in my effort to verify claims, I realized...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. self-sourced promo Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Dr. Rachel Thomas (edit |...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, promo. The Banner talk 20:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG. RegistryKey(RegEdit)...
Click to read more »of secondary sources covering him. Trimmed down more WP:PROMO material. Trimmed down WP:PROMO copy in introduction. Bebenitwit (talk) 14:02, 2 October...
Click to read more »04:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Keep but like a song and not like a single. Promo single. Like Radar by Britney Spears.--Aaa16 (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2009...
Click to read more »jsp?tsk=59516M&pc=24433M&keycode=59516M&promocode=24433M&promo_key=24433M (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2018-05-29 09:56:19 (UTC): User Rana1 Mohamed...
Click to read more »The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 14:15, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC) promo. nothing here, including the ex link, that wouldnt be more appropriate in...
Click to read more »RandoxLabs (talk · contribs), with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. — Cirt (talk) 22:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 17:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC) Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:26,...
Click to read more »(UTC) User:Altaflucknow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Promo-only user page with also addresses and phone numbers mentioned, out of scope...
Click to read more »content that matters (it doesn't matter if it was originally an advert, POV, promo, COI etc.) per Wikipedia:Edits, not editors. Deletion doesn't deter Deletion...
Click to read more »January 2019 (UTC) Delete - Does not pass WP:GNG. Clear violation of WP:PROMO. Needs to be deleted. Skirts89 (talk) 18:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »been deleted multiple times. No indication of notability, and highly WP:PROMO. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »alone article. Trivial promo piece and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Kierzek (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Mere PROMO for a nonnotable "national...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Probems with WP:CATALOG and WP:PROMO. Poorly referenced. While the series itself its notable, the individual...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Extremely limited promo release. Never an official single release Paul75 (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2009...
Click to read more »and removed for promo and failing WP:GNG. Again recreated and author challenging speedy deletion. Still this article is (self?)promo and fails WP:GNG...
Click to read more »Seems to possibly fail WP:PROMO, it seems pretty buzzword-y. Can't find notable mention of it from Google searches, outside of promo pages and the like. bojo...
Click to read more »'Descrizione:' Logo Musicletter (fondo bianco), 2005. URL: http://www.musicletter.it/Promo/mlbianco.png ' Licenza:'Creative Commons Attribuzione (( cc-by-3.0 }}</...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Originally created as a puff piece, after culling promo all we're left with is one promotional sentence and a single link to a mention...
Click to read more »12 February 2011 (UTC) Delete Reads like a promo for the product. I would almost go as far as CSD-G11-Promo Enfcer (talk) 22:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Peter Rehse (talk) 08:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Delete - Primary sourced promo piece, did a 2 minute tidy but unlikely to be salvageable. --Natet/c 10:48...
Click to read more »page. —Korath (Talk) 00:20, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, advert/promo. Megan1967 01:19, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete NN. --Fuzzball! (talk) 02:15,...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete how is this still around?! I No notability and purely WP:PROMO. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:PROMO - this page was the creation of User:TJG2020 (note the initials of the subject), now blocked for promo. Article was prodded;...
Click to read more »D (nn) User:Youtuberabhishek22/sandbox (0 days) Pass as deleted as promo KylieTastic (talk) 10:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) unnotable, promo L3X1 (distant write) 01:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »news-coverage.BLP1E.Much of the coverage at the Times-of-Oman do look to be paid-promo.And, the current state of the article is semi-G11able stuff. ~ Winged BladesGodric...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.spysoftwarecoupon.com/mspy-promo-code/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2018-10-04 22:06:30 (UTC): w:sr:User:Dcirovic...
Click to read more »not notable, company promo. Megan1967 23:04, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) Keep and clean up. - SimonP 01:00, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC) Delete, nn, promo. Edeans 22:27, 8 Mar...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Delete per nom Spiderone 16:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC) Delete - WP:PROMO article that doesn't meet notability guidelines. -- Dane talk 02:34, 9 August...
Click to read more »(10cc album) (you have to just listen to both) and was only released as a promo. no point in a separate page as all the necessary information can be reflected...
Click to read more »as such this is not a WP:LISTED case. Additionally, the article fails WP:PROMO as it is clearly promotional in content and was created by an apparent potential...
Click to read more »User:Altaf ahmed lucknow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Promo-only user page with also addresses and phone numbers mentioned, out of scope...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) badly sourced PROMO page for an actress; press releases and blogs. Has been speedied and prodded;...
Click to read more »blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC). delete promo puff sourced from promo puff. lacks significant coverage I reliable sources w/ rep for...
Click to read more »aforementioned website Geoff Who, me? 01:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC) Delete As WP:PROMO. Not a single book hit, but plenty of shady websites promising to cure toenail...
Click to read more »31 August 2014 (UTC) Delete per Db-promo. -- nafSadh did say 05:49, 31 August 2014 (UTC) Delete as seems promo. –Davey2010 • (talk) 06:10, 31 August...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems more like a fan-built/promo article about a non-notable "scholar" who doesn't meet WP:NSCHOLAR than...
Click to read more »– filelakeshoe (t / c) 14:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC) Delete purely WP:PROMO for a tour of imho non notable girls who have an article already. This article...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NCORP, WP:GNG, and WP:PROMO. I think the only argument to be made is that their affiliation with MACH37...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) WP:MILL company with nothing passing WP:COMPANY. Purely WP:PROMO Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:50, 28 September 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: inrdeals.com/signup?promo=PRAD17T (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2017-10-21 11:23:16 (UTC): User...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:PRODUCT. WP:PROMO applies. Not enough details for a standalone article. Being endorsed by...
Click to read more »edited the userpage of the other account with a promo piece after the other account was blocked for promo username Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Unencyclopedic. Carrp | Talk 23:44, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete. Looks like a self-promo. --Sillydragon 23:45, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) Weak delete for vanity/advertising...
Click to read more »According to the CD label, it's a promo sampler, and hence not likely to meet WP:MUSIC, which species that promo-only releases seldom do. (See discogs...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NALBUM. (article is result of COI/promo activity) Widefox; talk 11:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Keep. Long anticipated...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo for a journal whose only function is promo. Redirect to M&A Source would be of dubious value since...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:PROMO page by promo-only account, company admits to their promotional intent here. No...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a notable company and article seems promo to an extent. Akronowner (talk) 15:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Keep. « Not...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:PROMO for a company that fails WP:GNG. —azuki (talk · contribs · email) 12:00...
Click to read more »2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, promo, possible vanity. Megan1967 00:50, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete. Another non-notable promo. I love the line "the specifics...
Click to read more »article, and while I cleaned up a bit of the blatant promo, this still seems nothing more than a promo article on a non-notable local band. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad...
Click to read more »not meet new and improved WP:NCORP; promo 'cruft based on WP:SPIP sourcing. I don't see a point of merging promo content on a nn entity, as it would not...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mostly commercial promo; not a successful product, nor one remarkably innovative, etc. Might be...
Click to read more »sources include clickbait article and another Wikipedia article, may be a promo. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG, PROMO. While I wouldn't say "burn it" for a promo piece like this, I don't see it as worthy of a Procedural...
Click to read more »discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Mere PROMO for self published author. No usable sources. None.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:34...
Click to read more »NsTaGaTr (Talk) 13:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC) Delete -- fails WP:BIO and written as WP:PROMO --EC Racing (talk) 19:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC) Delete overly promotional...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Probably created as WP:PROMO but is not unambiguous advertising so it is ineligible for speedy deletion...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A WP:PROMO page on a company that is yet not notable. The article is largely self-cited...
Click to read more »source. Praxidicae (talk) 19:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC) Delete Seems more like WP:PROMO or WP:SPAM than anything else. Not enough reliable sources to present an...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Poorly sourced buzzword. Article mainly serves as WP:PROMO for the Oude Kerk, Amsterdam. Obvious WP:COI (http://artdaily...
Click to read more »promote a company. Old revisions and self promo are not allowed in userspace per WP:COPIES and WP:UP#PROMO. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:44, 5 January 2022...
Click to read more »most watched shows) as such. The artwork is on promo CDs that have been issued. The artwork on the promo CDs for Kylie's last two singles All The Lovers...
Click to read more »meat and the master is blocked for promo/username vio however it's apparent they're all SPAs just intent on adding promo/inappropriate content to Defense...
Click to read more »14:03, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete: promo, insignificant. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:24, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 06:55, 26 Apr 2005...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Blatant WP:PROMO by a user who has been blocked due to promotional editing. Zackmann08 (Talk...
Click to read more »Thanks, North America1000 00:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO. With most of the article consisting of the section on how to apply, this...
Click to read more »much information about this in Google. Fails WP:GNG and seems to be WP:PROMO. Abishe (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Straightaway PR/Advertising WP:PROMO. Fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:BIO and whatever one can add. As a nominator...
Click to read more »currently the 90% SPA promo account is not claiming a COI, so I'm resisting calling it what it appears to be. Underneath the promo, there may be a notable...
Click to read more »2/傀儡政權. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC) Delete - per WP:UP#PROMO. I haven't seen this before. User's are allowed short-term hosting of preferred...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo spam and possible conflict of interest, more from the same likely WP:SPA account that brought you promo spam article Mark Desvaux...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This company page is 100% WP:PROMO. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:36, 14 December 2024...
Click to read more »discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 21:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC) Delete -- just a promo blurb, with routine coverage of funding, partnerships and clients served...
Click to read more »19:16, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Delete This likely has COI/self-promo issues, and could even be a hoax. All the same, it fails every flavour of...
Click to read more »career, falling foul of WP:UP#PROMO. DAJF (talk) 23:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:UP#PROMO and WP:FAKEARTICLE. North America1000...
Click to read more »there. Sionk (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC) Delete This feels like a COI–PROMO situation. The article has been put up for several deletions (WP:G8, WP:A7...
Click to read more »on imdb ApLundell (talk) 17:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC) Apparently that's promo art for season 2. Season 1's poster appears to be dude blowing his brains...
Click to read more »Thanks, North America1000 05:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page with over abundance of ext links embedded in the...
Click to read more »business.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:45, 14 July 2020 (UTC) Delete complete PROMO.--Goldsztajn (talk) 03:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Delete Promotional spam. -...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced promo piece for a doctor with no indication of notability per WP:Academic or WP:BIO...
Click to read more »Nigeria. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2025 (UTC) Delete: Very PROMO, written like a resume. Nothing notable in the sourcing, simply a list of...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. A promotional attempt WP:PROMO. Calling for an AfD discussion. Hatchens (talk) 14:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 21:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC) Delete as PROMO. Self-published aughot. No gNews hits at all.[1].E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:08...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Delete GNG, NCORP, promo undertones. L3X1 (distant write) 16:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:56, 21 March...
Click to read more »at WP:NMUSICBIO.– Ammarpad (talk) 15:15, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Delete as WP:PROMO intended solely for publicity purposes and prohibited by policy. For those...
Click to read more »Back-o-the-Can text (or website copyvio? will check) but even so non-notable promo/ad thing. Master Thief Garrett 09:58, 1 May 2005 (UTC) Keep, any company...
Click to read more »the wider world. Isaac R 00:31, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 05:34, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, POV, and no real potential or...
Click to read more »mark it up speedy-promo, but thought community input would be wise. In case I'm not being clear, my deletion rationale is TNT for PROMO. I don't see a good...
Click to read more »what looks like separate autobiography promo that got caught up in it. There are several new accounts now, all promo, listed at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_in...
Click to read more »to fail WP:NBIO. Amigao (talk) 17:59, 27 June 2026 (UTC) * Delete Promo, promo, promo. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2026 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and FILM. Short promo film. Sources are promo and primary. BEFORE showed promo, Nothing that meets IS RS SIGCOV addressing...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Classic WP:UPE and WP:PROMO pattern Kqol • talk 23:40, 13 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »articles listed were verifiable, and most appear to be press release type promo and/or not reliable sources. Art Business News appears to be a real thing...
Click to read more »like WP:PROMO. LibStar (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Delete per the lack of multiple, reliable, in-depth, secondary references and WP:PROMO. As to...
Click to read more »primary - David Gerard (talk) 11:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO. This is a weakly sourced vanity page with no indication of the subject's...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Paid article. WP:PROMO. scope_creep (talk) 12:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC) Delete according to the WP:PROMO policy which says that Wikipedia...
Click to read more »typical WP:PROMO language. "Salt" too. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC) Delete, not notable, does not pass WP:Corp and has WP:promo problems...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Article is found to be in violation of WP:PROMO and WP:GNG, and is deemed unfit for inclusion in this encyclopedia. Articles...
Click to read more »as there are no reliable independent third party sources, only blogs and promo material, article is a mere advertisement Hekerui (talk) 12:51, 17 April...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Delete - Notability is lacking. Subject of this WP:COISELF WP:PROMO article has no more inherent notability than thousands of other internet...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) promo The Banner talk 18:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »so this is block evasion. Also continued promo so even if they were softblocked it still continues the promo issues. Lavalizard101 (talk) 13:11, 15 January...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo article which added multiple promotional images in the advert version found...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Poorly sourced self-promo piece. Blatant advertising with IP putting removed promo back in. The Banner talk 15:19, 1 February 2015...
Click to read more »result was speedy keep. Withdraw per Natureium. Please restore to less promo version. (non-admin closure) John from Idegon (talk) 22:49, 7 May 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of WP:PROMO, didn't notice it was an autobio when I deprodded it, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO, fails...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Vanity self-promo. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep and fix. As a...
Click to read more »the promo tone and add a couple independent sources but article creator and an IP are trying to re-insert unsourced info and put back all promo text...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Apparent promo (either for book or reviewer). No clear assertion of notability under WP:NB...
Click to read more »only partiality links to: sell-site CD Universe, self-promo myspace, band's record company’s promo-site, and newstime.com's band-self-referencing article...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Pretty much a promo for a random musician. Written like a resume. Not a single secondary source...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Largely WP:PROMO article. 2 editors have been adding promotional content that is copied and...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) Delete: WP:PROMO. Not passing GNG. Zuck28 (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2026 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Clearly a PROMO. Retro music11 (talk)...
Click to read more »discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC) Delete tagged promo since 2015. –Cupper52Discuss! 13:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC) Delete: Strange...
Click to read more »PerfectDisk, which I got from Google Cache, was actually worse (in the promo sense) than this article. For now, someone else can take a turn at a rewrite...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Peacocky promo piece on a non-notable singer. I was trying to speedy this, but a mystery...
Click to read more »(diff - DELETED) - Link: wiki.cizaro.com/index.php?title=Jackpot_Game_Casino_Promo_Code_Askgamblers_Wiki. (R/Xmeta/L) 1970-01-01 00:00:00 (UTC): w:da:User:SiobhanMenendez...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo, in my opinion an attempt to attract highly educated people to move to the...
Click to read more »the article is a promo for his company, which was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReNewIT for notability and blatant promo, and nearly all of...
Click to read more »However, this isn't a full-length studio album, and I'm not convinced that a promo EP counts as being sufficiently notable. CLW 15:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and His Followers is overstuffed with dead links, trailers, blatant PROMO, film promo blogs, and social media. Not clear to me that there is any reliable...
Click to read more »(UTC) WP:SNOW delete mere PROMO of non-notable book.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Delete As per nom. WP:PROMO and not notable. --FuzzyGopher...
Click to read more »TWL) Article created by WP:SPA, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. — Cirt (talk) 06:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to be a non-notable website.Promo-mess. Winged BladesGodric 11:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NN statistical software package, WP:PROMO. I'd remove the promo, but there would be nothing left and I'd be accused of blanking...
Click to read more »pieces/primary sources and I can find no better. Major fluffy inflated promo piece. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Delete - Fails...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete: non-notable businessman; promo-pushing article. There is less here than meets the eye. Quis separabit?...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. But, easily passes WP:PROMO Hatchens (talk) 15:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »this company from the pack. Not notable, no real information and probable promo page. — Cory Maylett 21:23, 19 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. Come back when...
Click to read more »Espresso. Blocked for promo username and edits. Now a brand new account (Café Buddy's Espresso) comes in creating a (now deleted) promo piece on the same...
Click to read more »says "promo single" a.k.a those sent to radio/press. See WP:SINGLE and Template:Infobox song where it says leaked copies, advance or limited promo releases...
Click to read more »discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Delete fails WP:PROMO lacking credible sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by EC Racing...
Click to read more »deleted. Edwardx (talk) 19:24, 28 October 2018 (UTC) Delete as unambiguous WP:PROMO. While it's possible for articles created and later edited by confirmed...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Straightaway PR/Advertising WP:PROMO. Lack of credible third-party citations. Currently, most of its news coverage...
Click to read more »July 2016 (UTC) Delete - just not noteworthy for a stand alone article; promo piece, at best. Kierzek (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »29 January 2021 (UTC) Delete. Entire sections of this article breach WP:PROMO and WP:NOTNEWS, with much unreliable sourcing (blogs, websites). With those...
Click to read more »08:06, 8 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per nomination. It's a case of WP:PROMO. University of The Purple Unicorn (talk) 08:30, 8 September 2025 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »themselves as reliable but are full of promo language. One even gives you a sales catalogue. Googling reveals more promo but I am yet to see disinterested/professional...
Click to read more »of him. Some don't even mention his name. Pure PR complete with official promo shot. And this has even been cleaned up a bit, [1]. duffbeerforme (talk)...
Click to read more »TWL) Subject fails WP: COMPANY notability and article appears to fail WP:PROMO. Sources are mostly primary (the company's own website) and those that aren't...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Delete, it is also a little bit WP:PROMO Rlink2 (talk) 21:12, 29 March 2022 (UTC) Definitely Promo issues, but not worth cleaning up unless it's...
Click to read more »contribution. Chetsford (talk) 16:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) Delete - WP:PROMO could apply here, but it fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG without a doubt. Kirbanzo...
Click to read more »Delete-This's G11-able stuff.∯WBGconverse 12:40, 18 June 2018 (UTC) Delete as WP:PROMO from an undisclosed paid editor, have added a G11 Atlantic306 (talk) 20:53...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable modern-day hoax. Received media attention as a book promo but no lasting RS coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 19:30, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »Like I said before, the article is need of desperate copy editing, remove promos, segments from the event section, they are non notable and unrelevant. Cut...
Click to read more »subject clearly fails to meet WP:GNG and also clearly written as per WP:PROMO. Its obviously written as a puffery with no neutral tone. Abishe (talk)...
Click to read more »Delete: WP:PROMO. ROY is WAR Talk! 03:28, 14 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO Agnieszka653 (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2026 (UTC) Delete SO WP:PROMO. Also,...
Click to read more »be easily done by sectioning. mikka (t) 30 June 2005 21:13 (UTC) Delete promo. JamesBurns 1 July 2005 04:06 (UTC) Keep and cleanup per Aleal, and rename...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:PROMO, doesn't meet GNG. The removed prod indicated that the subject didn't meet...
Click to read more »23 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:53, 27 February 2026 (UTC) Delete: Wp:PROMO per Spiderone(Talk to Spider). ScottyNolan...
Click to read more »It's a self-promotion page. WP:PROMO. —Ben Kovitz (talk) 03:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Per reasons above, namely WP:PROMO. AP1787 (talk) 15:04, 22 March...
Click to read more »Recreation of deleted articles (promo). See user page and contribs, specifically: this. Listing all the deleted promo articles and recreation of several...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per WP:PROMO. Some parts of the articles are written like an advertisement (e.g. 'Located...
Click to read more »discussions. Matthew hk (talk) 09:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC) Speedy delete as Promo. Not much to salvage as likely not passing notability either. As a side...
Click to read more »notability; appears to be strictly promo content. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC) Delete -- strictly promo content/lack of interest. Lucasstar1...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, not notable, self-promo. Megan1967 02:50, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, kind of borderline, but it's the self-promo moreso than the lack of notability...
Click to read more »artists worked with. Typical promo piece failing verification of source #1. Previously deleted at AfD, SPA/COI blocked sock promo spam article Widefox; talk...
Click to read more »third-party sources as Google only lists school directories and a random old promo in local press. — kashmīrī TALK 17:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC) Delete: fails...
Click to read more »mention [4] uncritical promo interview [5] award nominee but apparently did not win? (source present twice) [6] uncritical promo interview [7] passing...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) promo The Banner talk 19:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-Notable topics, not pass WP:ORG and seems like as WP:PROMO or WP:ADVERT or WP:SPAM and the editor decleared creator have Conflict of...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) By the article's own admission, it is a promo. A promo with a limited release in the UK, no less. Notability is not substantiated...
Click to read more »04:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Claims own work, but looks very much like a promo image. Liftarn 09:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC) I very much dubt the user created...
Click to read more »other trivial awards. DGG ( talk ) 19:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC) Delete Promo piece on a run-of-the-mill digital marketing agency that is in no way unique...
Click to read more »06:34, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete. Band promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:43, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete, non notable, promo. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:44, 21 Feb 2005...
Click to read more »15 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 08:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:50, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »COI problems, probable PROMO issues, etc. Guliolopez (talk) 13:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Comment The reason I suggest COI/PROMO issues is because the publication...
Click to read more »Not notable, promo, and an orphan article --FuzzyGopher (talk) 18:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC) Strong delete and salt: Non notable,promo-like and mere...
Click to read more »article StuartDouglas 10:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC) SPEEDY DELETE its self promo, vanity and hes usin wiki as an advert site esp with "FOR BOOKINGS OR MORE...
Click to read more »top) - Link: deltadaily.com/2012/03/18/emotional-new-the-voice-australia-promo-featuring-delta-goodrem/ (R/Xmeta/L) User is in trusted groups rollbacker...
Click to read more »contributions. Seems like a business executives profile and nothing more (WP:PROMO). I already removed a LinkedIn link. Given its deletion and draft history...
Click to read more »was speedy deleted. Already speedy deleted the day before. Too much WP:PROMO. Will WP:SALT at WP:ECP level. El_C 12:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »notability. Lots of promo, but nothing that shows N. BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Unreviewed at NPP for years, probably due to volume of promo sourcing. Here is...
Click to read more »this page. The result was delete. Dakota 06:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC) del promo of nonnotable burlesque group. 34 unique google hits. `'mikkanarxi 05:00...
Click to read more »California#District 43. Failed politician fails WP:NPOL and I echo the PROMO concerns of Edawrdx. Bkissin (talk) 15:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC) Delete being...
Click to read more »sounds like an ad. William2001(talk) 20:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC) Delete WP:PROMO. Can be rewritten as a stub. Coffeeluvr613 (talk) 23:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Leaning keep/comment As the article stands it is blatant WP:PROMO and direct WP:COPYVIO from http://www.qeelin.fr/site/swf/base.swf - but...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and seems to have been written as WP:PROMO. Abishe (talk) 11:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »multiple accounts coming to add blatant PROMO to the page, and replacing it when deleted. settling on a PROMO-free version and page protecting makes sense...
Click to read more »HoarseHorsie (talk) 00:04, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Delete-also comes across as a promo page. Wgolf (talk) 01:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »No coverage outside of self-published sources, fails WP:GNG. Likely WP:PROMO. Pilaz (talk) 22:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 00:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC) Delete as basically WP:PROMO. Sources are mostly pamphlets and promotional web ephemera. Subject has...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete nn magazine article written as a promo piece. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Cruft and promo pieces prop up this article of an upcoming Tv Series. Should be deleted...
Click to read more »19:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Delete: Not notable, and just another more WP:PROMO article, with WP:COI created by a WP:SPA editor. --FuzzyGopher (talk) 19:11...
Click to read more »like a rush job. No real effort to even put capital letters. Seems like a promo. ArcticDragonfly (talk) 14:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC) Delete: Created by the...
Click to read more »nom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO and WP:TNT. Largely concur with nom that this is not salvageable. K.e.coffman...
Click to read more »Delete for PROMO. This was the only mention in RS I can find, it's trivial [1] Oaktree b (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:PROMO. -- StarryNightSky11...
Click to read more »07:09, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 10:18, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) Delete, promo. I've also protected the India page from his repeated...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to pass WP:GNG. A promotional attempt WP:PROMO - "Content made for Advertising, marketing, or public relations purposes"...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMO. A Google search turned up no 3rd party references at all. The link to "Secretly...
Click to read more »06:51, 10 May 2011 (UTC) Appears to be self-promotional per Wikipedia:UP#PROMO. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 18:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC) Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE...
Click to read more »not even released yet, article needs to be rewritten to not sound like promo, but because it isn't released it can't be fixed so AfD L3X1 My Complaint...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Fails notability per WP:SONG. Promo release in France only, even this promo release was extremely limited. Paul75 (talk) 03:16,...
Click to read more »22, 2004 (UTC) Merge and redirect to Banjax. Geogre 00:33, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC) Delete, no redirect. Promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:33, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete mere PROMO for a musician sourced to Amazon.com, itunes, and self. Page has been tagged for multiple issues - sourcing, promo - for 5 years....
Click to read more »The Banner talk 22:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Yeah, clearly PROMO; thing is, some PROMO articles are about stuff that is actually notable. This doesn't...
Click to read more »clearly WP:PROMO. MassiveYR ♠ 20:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Delete all three articles; they fail WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG, apart from the WP:PROMO violation...
Click to read more »only for one construction project, and the article itself seems more WP:PROMO than anything else. Darren-M talk 14:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Heavily WP:PROMO with no independent references. I found some brief mentions: https://www...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo piece, ?. Speedy deletion template removed by the creator. Kavdiamanju (talk)...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) No evidence this guy meets WP:NMUSICIAN, it's a heaping pile of promo and sourced to interviews and hyper local sources and in fact all the claims...
Click to read more »discussions. Waxworker (talk) 08:00, 4 December 2022 (UTC) Delete Seems to be WP:PROMO material as evidenced by the use of trademarks. Doesn't seem to have WP:SIGCOV...
Click to read more »title. ☺ Uncle G (talk) 13:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Delete Aside from the WP:PROMO aspects (I nearly tagged it with G11 but the content is arguably not exclusively...
Click to read more »April 2010 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NALBUMS: "Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may...
Click to read more »store robber turned motivational speaker. The article was pretty much WP:PROMO, so I completely re-wrote it. Would like to see further input on the article...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo for non notable filmmaker. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources...
Click to read more »Australia. Shellwood (talk) 07:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC) Delete looks like a WP:PROMO. LibStar (talk) 10:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC) Delete agree with the promotional...
Click to read more »discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:08, 6 March 2019 (UTC) Delete. Obvious WP:PROMO by somebody or other. WP:TNT looks like best solution if, by some chance...
Click to read more »actually couldn't disagree with you more david, but I think it fails WP:PROMO the way the second half is written. Obviously written by someone close to...
Click to read more »of the Dragonflame". Well that was a promo-release, and every Rhapsody album by Limb Music Productions had a promo-release. We have an article for the...
Click to read more »discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC) Delete -- WP:PROMO on a minor tech startup. Even includes the company's mission statement:...
Click to read more »institute into further WP:PROMO content). If the decision is "keep," note that I stripped out most of the overwhelming amount of WP:PROMO/WP:NOTMEMORIAL content...
Click to read more »Delete : seems like pretty blatant PROMO to me. MurrayGreshler (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO and the fact there are not really...
Click to read more »article is more like an academic resume and then jumps into judo. A self promo piece. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 04:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Delete No reliable...
Click to read more »Redirect to The Smashing Pumpkins discography. It's a live EP given away as a promo, so you wouldn't expect much coverage. I can't find any reviews, although...
Click to read more »17:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC) Tagging for speedy db-promo Speedy delete Hellfire and damnation for promos. Dusti*poke* 19:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Possibly hopelessly WP:PROMO. Maybe WP:TNT? If you remove all of the unreliable sources it's not clear...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Keep - He has notability from those promos that aired on SmackDown back in 2008. Sure, they never led to anything,...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Promo only release fails WP:MUSIC. Contested PROD. Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:48, 2...
Click to read more »--DAJF (talk) 13:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Per nom. Slightly promo too. Dengero (talk) 13:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC) This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Delete Per Britishfinance. Likely a promo piece. Best, GPL93 (talk) 04:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC) Delete TOOSOON promo piece. Definitely COI, possible PAID...
Click to read more »New Bag - Family Guy promo.png FfDed by TBrandley was closed; discussion 05 May 2013 – File:No Meals on Wheels - Family Guy promo.png FfDed by Beerest355...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Multiple brands are being advertised, there's nothing in WP:PROMO that restricts the concept to pages that mention only one brand. Roger (Dodger67)...
Click to read more »time you have someone try (and fail) at writing a completely mediocre WP:PROMO article for an American entity, don't make it look so transparent by having...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 04:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Delete as WP:PROMO, merge / redirect into main article. — fortunavelut luna 12:35, 4 October...
Click to read more »is still missing promo releases, has promo singles incorrectly listed as commercial releases, has commercial releases listed as promo singles, has charting...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo and content fork of Sonbhadra district The Banner talk 10:09, 20 November...
Click to read more »table: Promo photos :: 1. https://malayalam.filmibeat.com/photos/malayalam-tv-actress-mersheena-neenu-stunning-instagram-stills-fb78595.html Promo :: 2...
Click to read more »be a vanity page and purely promotional, which Wikipedia does not do WP:PROMO. Does not meet high standards for sourcing WP:BLP. Fails GNG and BIO. Steve...
Click to read more »Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete, not notable - less than 45 Google hits, possible promo. Megan1967 06:45, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete, eek, self-promotion. Wyss 11:43...
Click to read more »in-depth source appears to be WP:PROMO. WidgetKid this is the way 04:39, 12 February 2026 (UTC) Delete, routine coverage and promo abound. ScalarFactor (talk)...
Click to read more »WP:ANYBIO. ——SerialNumber54129 18:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC) Delete violates WP:PROMO. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC) Delete reference not stong...
Click to read more »