Redirect to:
The project namespace or Wikipedia namespace is a namespace consisting of administration pages with information or discussion about Wikipedia. Pages in...
Click to read more »Just note that userboxes are only allowed to be housed in userspace, projectspace, and templatespace. See Wikipedia:Userboxes#Namespace for more. Wikipedia:Requested...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC) Remove from projectspace this projectspace page which does not fit the projectspace schema per WP:PAGES because it is not a...
Click to read more »July 2006 (UTC) Contesting subject's notability. Note the corresponding projectspace and meta pages. As the project is mostly active on de: and I do not read...
Click to read more »editing very low, but this is not the case in projectspace. You should not be engaging in projectspace if you don’t understand the place, and if you understand...
Click to read more »keep. - Koweja (talk) 06:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC) Userfy or move into projectspace. A talk page subpage isn't really an appropriate place to keep these...
Click to read more »Program in the United States and Canada maintained lists of classes in its projectspace between 2011-2014. First the two countries were listed separately, and...
Click to read more »policy and can't even begin to fathom the labyrinthine depths of the projectspace, because of the Dunning Kruger effect, or because they really, earnestly...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) These are a bunch of mostly one- to two-sentence projectspace "humor" pages that are not funny, are orphaned, and appear abandoned/unfinished...
Click to read more »checked the list on the talk page. I personally thought CJ had more projectspace contribs than that (I've seen him around there much more than the number...
Click to read more »Alexander (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This projectspace article doesn't belong to projectspace. This is a biography. Marvellous Spider-Man 10:58...
Click to read more »valid in Projectspace. Collect (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Note that this page is not in the Userspace, but rather the Projectspace. Achowat...
Click to read more »abbreviations, abbreviations that may be used without definition. For projectspace abbreviations, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia abbreviations Here (https://www...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, but rather on MediaWiki systems in general. It does not belong in projectspace. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:04, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Keep but rename to Wikipedia:MediaWiki...
Click to read more »(UTC) ? You responded to my comment about projectspace but listed a bunch of things that aren't in projectspace. I supported keeping this template (and...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Comment – the article was moved to projectspace by the creator, so I've moved it back to mainspace pending the outcome...
Click to read more »of a newbie on Wikipedia). However, it isn't really appropriate for projectspace, though it isn't the creator's fault that he didn't know that. (As an...
Click to read more »11:46, 19 July 2026 (UTC) You are incorrect. I was fully aware of the projectspace page when I created the mainspace article. As I explained at the MfD...
Click to read more »Speedily Approved. - Bot has been running for a while, only edits in projectspace and userspace. Mr.Z-man 18:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »IPs should not be editing projectspace. IPs lack accountability. You must log in to your main account to edit projectspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:19, 18...
Click to read more »objection to having the page in userspace and deleting the page in the projectspace. Perhaps we can close this MfD via WP:SNOW or WP:CSD#G7 (author-requested...
Click to read more »(UTC) Support anything which stops this being a projectspace essay. Doesn't meet the standard of projectspace-worthiness because it is not about Wikipedia...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) If you have an account, it is a violation of WP:SOCK to edit projectspace logged out. If you don’t have an account, please WP:REGISTER. Some level...
Click to read more »to me, maybe? ) 23:55, 7 June 2026 (UTC) …Change !vote to move all to projectspace (would be my preference) or userspace. Newer !votes made this more clear…...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, developed in userspace by John Broughton, has been moved to projectspace. The Romanian Wikipedia reaches 100,000 articles. The Lithuanian Wiktionary...
Click to read more »userspace Includes all pages within the User: and User talk: namespaces. projectspace Includes, for the purposes of this discussion, all other namespaces and...
Click to read more »logs) This appears to have been unilaterally undeleted and moved to projectspace by an admin, Hex, after being deleted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:ASCII (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This isn't an anything. Projectspace is not a storage space for random lookup tables, and it isn't clear what...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC) WP:Register, login, or keep out of projectspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC) @SmokeyJoe: I only ask...
Click to read more »soft delete. The consensus is clear that this page does not belong in projectspace, but it can be userfied if Dragons flight or another user wants to preserve...
Click to read more »mainly just opposed to deleting. There is no doubt that it belongs in projectspace, and that it's a good idea to retain information about past course pages...
Click to read more »User:The_Transhumanist. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2019 (UTC) Move to the projectspace. Likely inappropriate for the mainspace, but has some project interlinking...
Click to read more »instead contact them quietly. And IPs do not belong in projectspace. Are you editing projectspace while logged out, in violation of WP:SOCK. Or are you...
Click to read more »sense whatsoever. The preferred location for userboxes is userspace or projectspace (if they relate to a certain project, as this one does). --Cyde Weys...
Click to read more »WP:NOTHERE for devoting most of their energy producing cruft like this in projectspace rather than actually improving the encyclopedia (and for socking). --Finngall...
Click to read more »we redirect projectspace to mainspace. This page existed in mainspace for several years, someone inappropriately moved it to projectspace a few days ago...
Click to read more »active contributor, though I agree it probably doesn't need to be in projectspace. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Userfy. Is a...
Click to read more »16:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC) Userfy for user:Eumat114. Remove all from projectspace per nom, but I don’t think there is reason to delete from userspace....
Click to read more »that they did not actually understand, and eventually that spread to projectspace here and on meta, resulting in their blocks. They are now socking under...
Click to read more »regarding or tailored to Wikipedia, so it is outside the scope of the projectspace. The creator also has only two edits, so userfication is inappropriate...
Click to read more »bad-faith actors, and he doesn't need to be memorialised with a "law" or a projectspace shortcut. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC) Hmm I hadn't...
Click to read more »20:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC) Delete per nom and Thryduulf. Mainspace-to-projectspace redirects for WikiProjects should not be encouraged, and the fact that...
Click to read more »on most public-facing projectspace. It just so happens that this unconstructive test edit also occupies public-facing projectspace that doesn't require...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Speedy delete per Metro. First time I've seen an article in projectspace, to be honest. –TCN7JM 00:45, 11 March 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result of the discussion was Keep and moved to projectspace Lenticel (talk) 11:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC) This is an essay, in the userspace...
Click to read more »about it needs and lacks elaboration. If completed, it could make a good projectspace essay. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »a user's opinion, on one day, but as written it is wrong. Delete the projectspace shortcuts. Not humor. Not a valid multi-authored or supported essay....
Click to read more »users as a tracking page. Either leave it where it is, or move it to projectspace for whatever wikiproject deals with folk songs. Nyttend (talk) 23:11...
Click to read more »Wikipedia and made a little userbox in userspace (not even in template/projectspace). This should not bother anyone, but now in addition to the userbox we...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was delete. Can be restored in projectspace via WP:REFUND if there is any active interest in maintaining it there...
Click to read more »third opinion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unneeded projectspace page and not the correct way or spot to do this (the draft is rejected...
Click to read more »description of internal Wikipedia / WMF processes. It's a perfect fit for projectspace, which is where it should be moved (and possibly later migrated to Meta)...
Click to read more »all for User:The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome. Deletion rationale applies to projectspace ok, but not userspace. Old gnome work. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:01, 4 May...
Click to read more »Also, the author was topic banned[1], but this was not a ban on writing projectspace essays on redirects. There is therefore no "banned" argument for deleting...
Click to read more »have a really good explanation, I suggest you withdraw. Also, dismal projectspace participation. -Amarkov blahedits 01:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose...
Click to read more »anywhere on Wikipedia, and are sometimes (though not commonly) used in projectspace and userspace. Ref tags can also be used for notes (rather than sources/citation)...
Click to read more »April 2010 (UTC) Doing an advanced search for "improving wikipedia" in projectspace [1] is not implausible. Such a search should come up with Wikipedia:Village...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Keeping, I now accept the rationale that this is allowed in projectspace as a valid viewpoint to express in an essay. Forgot to mention this here...
Click to read more »looks to have never had any impact, and it doesn’t seem justified in projectspace. Userfying for the author is a good way to preserve it for the author...
Click to read more »have developed so far, and will continue I hope to do so). The term "projectspace" is being applied to the whole overall encyclopaedic project (with its...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:GAMEtxt – NJD-DE (talk) 00:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Move to projectspace Keep it’s harmless, good-narured and at least appears to have a vaguely...
Click to read more »arguably not broad enough to exist as a standard portal. No objection to projectspace-fying, if the WikiProject wishes to keep it around. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Projectspace pages by The Master of Hedgehogs (delete) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Projectspace pages by The Master of Hedgehogs...
Click to read more »an article in the wrong namespace. It's not clear what it's doing in projectspace in its current form, and AFAIK we're still in agreement that it doesn't...
Click to read more »McClenon (talk) 03:47, 13 October 2018 (UTC) Draftify - Not appropriate for projectspace but seemingy reasonable enough for draftspace. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 06:08...
Click to read more »— Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC) Move to the creator's userspace. Projectspace is for essays with wider use, greater significance, greater readership;...
Click to read more »reader from mainspace into the service rooms. Here, someone looking in projectspace for the now redundant material would like to be sent to the current best...
Click to read more »migrate to WP:SHORTHAND or the like, but for now it's too niche for projectspace. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete. We really need to clear more of this crap out of projectspace. ^demon[omg plz] 17:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC) Trans-namespace - To User:Humblefool's...
Click to read more »tool (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This does not belong in projectspace. Catgirllover4ever (talk) 04:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Delete, and I'd...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Snuggle/Notice (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This projectspace template is now not only useless and misleading. It consists entirely...
Click to read more »ie if it is only made unorphaned by a link from within userspace or projectspace, will the bot leave the orphan tag alone? — neuro(talk) 12:01, 19 February...
Click to read more »was filed as a mainspace category instead of a projectspace category, so I converted it to projectspace accordingly. But somebody other than the original...
Click to read more »Keep: not a draft. It's something statistical that might well belong in projectspace. Cf. WP:STATS. I admit this is an unconventional analysis (i.e., based...
Click to read more »can't think of any other reason it would occur to someone to put it in projectspace... -Amarkov blahedits 01:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per above...
Click to read more »this page. The result of the discussion was Keep - No need to move to projectspace from userspace, but no prejudice against the move either. - jc37 06:33...
Click to read more »updating (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Not a useful addition to projectspace. Redundant to Wikipedia:Tagging pages for problems and Help:Maintenance...
Click to read more »definitely not start commenting on every AFD created just to get more projectspace edits. Back to the actual question, I think Wikipedia would lose a chance...
Click to read more »on the creator's own user talk page and then incorrectly moved into projectspace instead of mainspace, but because there's no sourcing and no credible...
Click to read more »Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 05:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Block: Has participated in projectspace discussions while logged out, in direct violation of WP:PROJSOCK. --...
Click to read more »but just not enough experience, sorry, and no meaningful experience in projectspace. [ roux ] [x] 06:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Neutral Hi! I applaud your...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was move to projectspace. Mr.Z-man 04:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »average userspace essay. More seriously, this certainly shouldn't be in projectspace, but I'm not seeing the degree to which having a "this is one guy's bizarre...
Click to read more »Burzmali 17:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Agree. A move into user- or projectspace is fine by meif anybody makes the suggestion.Circeus 18:53, 10 September...
Click to read more »the history, no objections to moving it to a more suitable namespace (projectspace?). But don't keep it in NS8. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:45, 3 April...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Also WP:NOTMEMORIAL clearly applies to articles, not projectspace. WJBscribe (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians (edit...
Click to read more »Wikipedia philosophy phenomenon. Do not merge. Although the current projectspace page has some style of an article, it need not, it can and should host...
Click to read more »to exist as a past user opinion. Agree that it should be removed from projectspace per nom. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:19, 6 February 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »above. Bduke (talk) 01:56, 18 October 2024 (UTC) Delete. Can't sit in projectspace, and an alternative to deletion is not needed.—Alalch E. 15:58, 21 October...
Click to read more »intended for mainspace? If it's not good advice, it doesn't belong in projectspace. That doesn't mean it doesn't belong in userspace (there's all kinds...
Click to read more »reflects a popular community consensus, and isn't inappropriate for projectspace. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result of the debate was remove from projectspace, hence I've userfied it. I've briefly considered BJAODNing but frankly...
Click to read more »([1], [2], [3]) that lead me to want to see it preserved somewhere in projectspace (with a protected redirect). ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 03:46, 21 April 2017...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was Moved to projectspace, so this doesn't belong here. --Rory096 22:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Sort...
Click to read more »but they were not. So what? No prohibition on pages for valid tests in projectspace. Keep.—Alalch E. 17:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC) Keep: People don't necessarily...
Click to read more »single-author essays, unworthy for projectspace. Encourage new users to write their thoughts in userspace essays, but reserve projectspace for new essays that are...
Click to read more »pinging this page that the author has moved it to draftspace and then to projectspace, both causing an error message with the AFD template, and multiline redirect...
Click to read more »image appears Olive ridley sea turtle, Playa de Escobilla Sanctuary, a projectspace page, and a userpage FP category for this image Wikipedia:Featured...
Click to read more »central tenet wasn't demonstrably incorrect. It has no business being in projectspace. There is no valid speedy deletion criterion that would work here, so...
Click to read more »to address the mounting tensions in the English Wikipedia province of projectspace, the United Nations announced this Wednesday that they would dispatch...
Click to read more »subpage devoted to reminding myself to write an essay; not appropriate for projectspace but certainly appropriate for the userspace. No harm in retaining the...
Click to read more »confusing current users of the encyclopedia, but don't just delete old projectspace pages when they are no longer needed, as they are part of the history...
Click to read more »really understood how we choose whether something goes into helpspace or projectspace.) But it's a nice handy info sheet for newer users. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:59...
Click to read more »Interesting, even if not baked. He shouldn’t have put it straight into Projectspace, like other things he shouldn’t have done, but that does not mean it...
Click to read more »Spartan008 (talk) 11:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Delete. A quick search of projectspace shows the name being mentioned in passing several times, with no real...
Click to read more »incorrect that on project pages we have nothing to guide us To delete a projectspace essay, that page would normally need to manifest use of the ... project...
Click to read more »is concerned, and I certainly would support deletion if this were in projectspace, but it's in userspace. As I keep saying, we need to give users more...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Approved. No issues as this only edits specific pages in projectspace which were otherwise abandoned/inactive. – SD0001 (talk) 11:50, 10 November...
Click to read more »16:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC) Keep. Minority view essays are allowed in projectspace. I think it is true, that many find it dumb, but it is also true that...
Click to read more »TonyBallioni (talk) 01:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC) Keep This is located in projectspace where great leeway exists to host every useful thing related to the project...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Delete. Whatever this is, it certainly doesn't belong in projectspace. Creator has zero edits in mainspace. 88.97.192.42 (talk) 10:10, 21 August...
Click to read more »mascots) for much of the source-verified material previously living in projectspace, whereas extensive displays of images should be in the corresponding...
Click to read more »The result of the discussion was delete as a userpage and merge to projectspace; the merge has already been done at Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Inappropriate use of cleanup metatemplate, projectspace, and wikiproject subpage. Reminds me of the Slavic-language Wikipedias...
Click to read more »start/expand a WikiProject, but should be maintained in userspace (or Projectspace) for now if that's the case. Otherwise, it's unlikely to ever be more...
Click to read more »good-standing are given wide latitude to write essays in both User- and Projectspace. This could use some work, but there is no need to delete it. -Atmoz...
Click to read more »debate was no consensus. Sandstein 20:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC) This projectspace list would be much better presented as a category. Every template on...
Click to read more »created in good faith, I'm not sure this page is high value enough for projectspace. Perhaps it should be userfied without leaving a redirect. –Novem Linguae...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) @Effeietsanders: These aren't generally appropriate for the projectspace in their current locations, nor are they ready for the mainspace, but...
Click to read more »Robert McClenon (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2026 (UTC) Weak delete Joke projectspace page that is in poor taste. I don't see any point in userfying such an...
Click to read more »Boribori!) 20:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Keep per the fact that this is a projectspace page and is not eligible for deletion under that policy. Besides, it...
Click to read more »resolution agreed to by nominator and author, which also deletes it from WP projectspace. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »keeping. --Kleinzach 00:37, 25 September 2012 (UTC) Move per Graham. Old projectspace pages like this one shouldn't be deleted when they're not hurting anything...
Click to read more »and you also make posts critical of metapedians who work mainly in the projectspace, which leads one to believe that you don't understand why we can't just...
Click to read more »Naconkantari. Will support in a few months if user becomes more active in projectspace. Also, I'm not convinced the user needs adminship. All of the things...
Click to read more »speedrun Brachy08 (Talk) 23:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC) Delete. Unworthy of projectspace. Dumb jokes belong in userspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:17, 18 October...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) @Johnbod: I'm ok with withdrawing this, but please tag the projectspace redirects with G7. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »redirects behind. Material is mostly userfied when it is inappropriate in projectspace, where someone has been "citing" it as if it's WP:P&G material or a community-accepted...
Click to read more »for those who either don't know or forget that all policy pages are in projectspace. Too bad it's improperly cross-namespace. Delete. –Pomte 11:49, 8 April...
Click to read more »Keep Wrong opinions are allowed in userspace. Heck, they are allowed in projectspace as well. Collect (talk) 08:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC) Keep I disagree...
Click to read more »project's one big table, separated by categories or manually archived in projectspace. A stats bot that scrapes afltables.com weekly during the season for...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge what where? I didn't see anything that would add to the projectspace. --Sam Blanning(talk) 04:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Move Couldn't this...
Click to read more »articles" is very misleading and irrelevant. It is not articles but projectspace logs that are being changed. Is there any work being done by this project...
Click to read more »evidence (correcting random errors in archived discussions, minor edits to projectspace pages, a minor obsession with actresses and moving to 'correct' pagenames)...
Click to read more »admin.Ganfon 22:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose Oppose. Insufficient projectspace participation implies lack of familiarity with process. - crz crztalk...
Click to read more »editors. This kind of thing isn't even appropriate in userspace, let alone projectspace. What will we entertain next, some user coming up with WP:EDITORSTHATPISSEDMEOFF...
Click to read more »Avaro wrote, but one that would make more sense in userspace than in projectspace. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:B15A:4ECC:3C0E:728A (talk) 19:37, 3 August 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »other than potentially driving its creator away. It doesn't belong in projectspace, since it doesn't serve any useful purpose, but if moved to his userspace...
Click to read more »logs) I'm am disputing the usefulness of this single-author essay in projectspace. There's no coherent argument. It says that blanking-and-redirecting...
Click to read more »Glades12 (talk) 14:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC) Delete, we don't need projectspace pages encouraging vandalism, even jokingly. Go to the Sandboxes if you're...
Click to read more »wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations...
Click to read more »this game, I can say that we already have this subject covered in the projectspace and we don't need an article about the 31st iteration of the game. --Metropolitan90...
Click to read more »for me!) Inappropriate in Wikipedia namespace. Waste of time in the projectspace, possibly divisive. Note that this was moved into userspace by Nishkid64 (talk ·...
Click to read more »interesting, but still odd, it may be ok in userspace but definitely not in projectspace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC) Delete - netierh funny...
Click to read more »enough projectspace participation, and, per BigDT, infamiliarity with technical projectspace stuff. Adminship is really a technical projectspace involved...
Click to read more »03:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Close and mark historical We almost never delete projectspace pages, even those that are now seen as bad ideas. Just mark it historical...
Click to read more »really have "educational value", yet some manages to find a home in projectspace. It seems like fine practice not to include the names of users who object...
Click to read more »wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations...
Click to read more »We tell users (quite correctly) that they can't fill the mainspace or projectspace up with trivial content. Fair enough. So they put it in their userspace...
Click to read more »better served by the wikiproject itself, and it's good for inactive projectspace topics to be marked as such explicitly, but prior commentators have pointed...
Click to read more »out of the projectspace? Keep, of course, (per above, really) and if you wish, start an RFC on the acceptability of any essay in projectspace. NW (Talk)...
Click to read more »find that there is consensus that 1) this rewrite doesn't belong in projectspace, 2) there was no editor consensus to create a wholesale rewrite, and...
Click to read more »wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations...
Click to read more »sufficient experience in deletion. They have edited only 70 times in projectspace and have not participated in any AfD discussion, nor appear to have significant...
Click to read more »to projectspace category but keep. All it really takes to turn a "mainspace" category into a "projectspace" category is to file it in projectspace parent...
Click to read more »of the "Wikipedia is failing" crowd are asserting, then it is NOT a projectspace essay." I did not include this as the reason for the move because I had...
Click to read more »Aaron Liu (talk) 22:34, 30 December 2024 (UTC) IPs have no place in projectspace. They should log in, or stick to mainspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:05, 30...
Click to read more »various talk namespaces. Finally, I have a couple of dozen edits to the projectspace. I'm not your average contributor. I also participate in several other...
Click to read more »been created in the first place. That applies to most things found in projectspace and userspace. It doesn’t so much apply to draftspace, because unimportant...
Click to read more »years (talk) 19:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Keep. This is an internal projectspace directory to assist editors in finding reliable sources, not a mainspace...
Click to read more »the master acknowledges prior accounts, [5] vs. e.g. [6] Intervenes in projectspace, supposedly on behalf of long-gone users; past socks blanked stoneage...
Click to read more »to determine whether there was a basis for notability, our existing projectspace tasklists for the Dictionary of Canadian Biography weren't in the results...
Click to read more »manually copied to that page for a period of time. I also object to old projectspace process pages being deleted just because they're currently unused - if...
Click to read more »SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC) Delete: does not belong in projectspace. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 14:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC) Comment: can this...
Click to read more »external search engines cannot be used on any talk page, a large part of projectspace, and any page tagged as noindex. Finally when presenting results, the...
Click to read more »to get it. I even tried "cheating" by doing a regex title search in projectspace using the known letters but to no avail. OutsideNormality (talk) 00:32...
Click to read more »going to cause a problem). Whether, as DGG suggests, these should be in projectspace is an editorial decision. Black Kite (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: Per nom. Userfy maybe, but must not look like it does in projectspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC) Redirect to Wikipedia:Teahouse...
Click to read more »creator being indeffed. This doesn't deserve the implicit approval of projectspace, but isn't so incoherent or dangerous as to demand deletion. Vaticidalprophet...
Click to read more »WP:Redirects are cheap, but, WP:Redirects are costly. This would be projectspace title clutter, redundant to the Wikipedia search engine, and is in discouraged...
Click to read more »Keep; if nothing else, we generally don't delete talk pages of existing projectspace pages unless there's a substantial problem with the talk page itself...
Click to read more »result of the debate was BJAODN (where it will be kept), but delete projectspace page. This is the consensus, and, I think, a fair compromise result,...
Click to read more »WP:NOTWEBHOST applies to all namespaces. This would be deleted in userspace and projectspace, so they reason does not only apply to articles. SmokeyJoe (talk) 15:11...
Click to read more »this, but I think there's strong enough sentiment to make a move to projectspace the right call here. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 07:06...
Click to read more »no reason not to let them keep it userfied. I support deletion from projectspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Keep Hi, everyone. I created...
Click to read more »attract editors in draftspace: all it will attract is a G13 tag. in projectspace. (Apologies, I completely misread the page title! Why the hell is this...
Click to read more »article-writer. If you want to run for RfA I'd advise bumping up your projectspace count, e.g. by more participation in XfDs. I can't see any recent civility...
Click to read more »stumbles upon a mention of this somewhere in projectspace/talkspace/etc likely knows to look for it in projectspace. eviolite (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »memorial to unworkable project ideas. If it's not going to be useful in projectspace, then it could not possibly work better in userspace where no one would...
Click to read more »the page move, that the creator mistakenly conflated mainspace with projectspace, and moved it to this title because they thought that's where finished...
Click to read more »really have "educational value", yet some manages to find a home in projectspace. It seems like fine practice not to include the names of users who object...
Click to read more »title. However, regarding its content, it is yet something else: the projectspace analogue of a WP:FAKEARTICLE on the topic of "illegal trafficking of...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Delete as one of several weird projectspace pages created by this entity. Creator has been blocked for socking and...
Click to read more »between editors with similar interests or views is best done using a projectspace essay with a signup section for editors interested in networking. If...
Click to read more »Unregistered accounts don’t have accountability and so should not be in projectspace, either WP:Register or stop WP:SOCKING. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:21, 14 March...
Click to read more »really have "educational value", yet some manages to find a home in projectspace. It seems like fine practice not to include the names of users who object...
Click to read more »Wikipedias. The page may be legitimately useful to him. It should not be in projectspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:03, 13 May 2025 (UTC) NickySuper9 is an old account...
Click to read more »you know that you are only allowed to use your main account to edit projectspace? Or are you only here to troll the community? SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:56...
Click to read more »need nominations subpage. Versus22 talk 05:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC) As a projectspace collaboration with a long, many-contributor history, do not delete, but...
Click to read more »this because of their continued insistence on editing logged-out in projectspace to manipulate AfD discussions ([9]). There are many ducky tells showing...
Click to read more »capitalization scheme, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was - see [2]. It's in projectspace now, and I don't think it's worthy of being here given the circumstances...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Redundant award page created as one of several weird projectspace pages by author who has since been indef'd for sockpuppetry and per WP:NOTHERE...
Click to read more »really have "educational value", yet some manages to find a home in projectspace. It seems like fine practice not to include the names of users who object...
Click to read more »of edits in mainspace, and the rest are mostly template. No edits in projectspace whatsoever. Both almost never edit from 7am UTC to 2pm UTC nor during...
Click to read more »Spider-Man 00:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Definitely doesn't belong in ProjectSpace. User:Tokyogirl79's move of 10:06, 6 March 2016 is mystifying. Related...
Click to read more »wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations...
Click to read more »confounds attempts to understand how stuff was done before. Reserve projectspace deletions for things that shouldn’t have been created in the first place...
Click to read more »find the lack of projectspace work troubling. I suggest that this user spends a few months working in several areas of projectspace and then tries again...
Click to read more »5 May 2011 (UTC) Keep. This sort of essay should be allowed in the projectspace. At worst, it should be renamed to make its point of view clearer, but...
Click to read more »23:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC) I disagree. Things like that would be good in projectspace, as it encourages editors create the articles, but it doesn't contribute...
Click to read more »March 2022 all of them redirect to mainspace articles rather than to projectspace pages. (For instance, WikiProject Women in RedWikiProject Women in Red...
Click to read more »required by this user before they become an admin, preferably in the projectspace, articlespace and user Talk pages. Incivility may well be due to lack...
Click to read more »Wikimedia-associated IRC channels." in the topic of the channel. Low number of real projectspace edits compounds this. --Rory096 21:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC) Oh, for god's...
Click to read more »really have "educational value", yet some manages to find a home in projectspace. It seems like fine practice not to include the names of users who object...
Click to read more »speediable under the same criterion (link elsewhere). WP:DICK and other projectspace soft redirects, which the editors supporting that may have been thinking...
Click to read more »to help other users. :) As other users have already mentioned, your projectspace edit count is low (80 out of 1275) which will be a serious problem if...
Click to read more »to be? In what planet does this make sense? Why is there a list, in PROJECTSPACE even, consisting of all of the 46656 combinations of three letters and...
Click to read more »belong in ProjectSpace at all, I think you should WP:Register. If you have ever registered, you are breaking WP:SOCK by editing projectspace while logged...
Click to read more »edited the project and template namespaces and L79's only edit was to projectspace, both of constitute evading the pblocks placed on Q28. Steward Checkuser...
Click to read more »hundreds of bibliographies produced by wikiprojects. I do not think projectspace is as pure in purpose and as inflexible as your characterizing here,...
Click to read more »Therefore, it would be best if the article could be kept around in projectspace while that can be done. AnotherNewAccount (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2015...
Click to read more »really have "educational value", yet some manages to find a home in projectspace. It seems like fine practice not to include the names of users who object...
Click to read more »populated enough.) - jc37 07:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Keep. As long as it's in projectspace, anything reasonably interesting related to the English Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »October 2011 (UTC) I agree with this rationale for userspace, but not for projectspace. I might agree with userfying, except we normally expect a user to ask...
Click to read more »Speedy keep Per above. Bearly541 02:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Move to projectspace. This kind of thing does not belong in the mainspace. This application...
Click to read more »June 2024 (UTC) Userify: Work-in-progress with little-to-no value in projectspace but which is within the purview of WP:UPYES. Curbon7 (talk) 06:57, 5...
Click to read more »"spamming" I found not a single mention of this edoitor in a search of all projectspace. As to the COI for the bio -- I note that this account has not edited...
Click to read more »experience, with less than 3 months of editing and 196 edits, 16 edits in projectspace.--Atlan (talk) 18:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC) Suggest withdrawl...this edit...
Click to read more »holes in the encyclopedia where readers may accidentally fall into the projectspace, especially for terms which are not strictly Wikipedia only. --Taelus...
Click to read more »political statement, appears to be some nonsense that doesn't need to be in projectspace. TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 17:44, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Keep as creator...
Click to read more »edit summary usage is not up to standards, and you have basically no projectspace edits. Wait 5-6 months and contribute to places like XFD and AIV. Shapiros10...
Click to read more »identified. --Orlady (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Keep and move to projectspace - this does seem to be a useful list of articles that need cleanup. Phrases...
Click to read more »to projectspace instead of mainspace even though COI articles are never allowed to bypass the WP:AFC process at all. It then sat in projectspace undetected...
Click to read more »which articles are yet to be created (this is a valid list to have in projectspace). It's not helpful for readers as it contains less than half, possibly...
Click to read more »21:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC) Userfy. Soapboxing is not the purpose of projectspace. If you'd like to somehow turn it into a policy proposal, a guideline...
Click to read more »permission on my talk page as this is taking place in my userspace and not projectspace. There are so many ways to do this wrong and this project is massive...
Click to read more »When a user (who is not blocked or site banned) is subject to an editing limitation by community consensus that prohibits the user from editing in the...
Click to read more »comes up with, it will ultimately have no effect since decisions made in projectspace do not override the core policy that is GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:10...
Click to read more »apparently has very little interaction with other users and very few projectspace edits. Focusing on articles is commendable, but I don't see why you need...
Click to read more »WP:BIDRAFT1 would probably be the best redirect, since it puts the page in the Projectspace so readers would not see it on a search for articles. MBisanz talk 20:34...
Click to read more »mainspace, as every single user page, talk page, user talk page and Projectspace page is not suitable for an encyclopedia. --Dweller (talk) 12:46, 10...
Click to read more »objection to this and the other lists subject for deletion to be moved to projectspace? I think they could have use for potential ideas on articles to create...
Click to read more »said he would attend to it. For the record, I support the redirect to projectspace as reasonable. Xoloz 19:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Delete all! WP:ASR wikipedia...
Click to read more »editing projectspace, including here. You should WP:Register, if you have not, and if you have you are violating WP:SOCK by editing projectspace. This is...
Click to read more »page to hold the Slovak word for trumpet, a Lithuanian adjective, and a projectspace link. If someone knows the Trump shortcut they'll know how to use the...
Click to read more »because anybody could just add that template to absolutely anything in projectspace (e.g. failed drafts, total nonsense, hoaxes, etc.) that they wanted to...
Click to read more »Godwin for responding to my query. The analysis of plausibility for projectspace redirects is a bit different from mainspace ones, because historically...
Click to read more »noticeboards to ask a question about recent WP research? None of our projectspace talk page appear particularly active and they're further fragmented into...
Click to read more »long enough that he should know what not to do with the tools. More projectspace experience is nice, but in this case it's not essential. BryanG(talk)...
Click to read more »categorically apply to projectspace, only for the mainspace. I can give many examples of WP:NOT policies that do not apply on projectspace, like WP:NOT#OR (all...
Click to read more »YechielMan has said above me, and would advise you to get more edits in projectspace before you go for an RfA - perhaps more participation in XfDs would help...
Click to read more »mentioned above, you realized that they've been found inappropriate as projectspace essays and subsequently stopped creating or moving them there. One contributor...
Click to read more »anywhere. This is because presence in Category:Wikipedia copyright and the Projectspace may cause unnecessary confusion to individuals attempting to decide if...
Click to read more »Userfy. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Projectspace is emphatically not provided to users as a personal Web space. Userfying...
Click to read more »was: Moved. I'm not sure if I exactly get the logic of moving this to projectspace rather than portalspace. However, the consensus is rather clear that...
Click to read more »Liliʻuokalani, but I am not aware of a clear guideline outside of a projectspace essay. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Keep for now. Per...
Click to read more »dispute that an article about the game ought to be maintained in the projectspace. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »redirecting to is more directly connected to article content than most projectspace pages. Maybe it would wind up at RfD, but it seems like a fine outcome...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms; this seems to come up more and more often in projectspace lately, and having something there, especially if we can ensure that...
Click to read more »question at which level we want to cover this kind of concept via a projectspace discussion or an RfC. Sandstein 19:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »Specifically, SecurePoll will let a user with 20 mainspace edits and 130 projectspace edits vote, even though the user does not have 150 mainspace edits. Voters...
Click to read more »(UTC) Oppose - quite inexperienced, but more crucially practically no projectspace edits at all. Black Kite 01:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Oppose due to lack...
Click to read more »belongs in userspace. Allowing every crap April Fool joke to live in projectspace is a very bad idea in the long run. Chris Cunningham (not at work) -...
Click to read more »misuse of G6. As a general rule, I think new users writing pages in projectspace should result in the page being userfied for them, and them being {{welcome}}d...
Click to read more »for a cabal is not unusual: if you look at the article (and the many projectspace pages like WP:TINC), referring to a "cabal" of Wikipedians and making...
Click to read more »tools - but the opposers raise valid points about lack of experience in projectspace. Try again in 2-3 months after more participation in discussions and/or...
Click to read more »you are familiar with policies. Also, near complete lack of talk or projectspace edits shows that you don't discuss things very much, which is kinda important...
Click to read more »backrooms. There is nothing undesirable about userspace, draftspace, projectspace or any talk space linking to articles. Indeed, every time a draft is...
Click to read more »responsive essay) in userspace rather than in Policy > Guideline > Essay projectspace, where other editors are tempted to point to it as if it were policy...
Click to read more »to succeed, I think you have what it takes to be a good admin. More projectspace participation will alleviate the opposers' concerns - in particular,...
Click to read more »Keep - New. Will eventually find use, mayhaps only in the userspace or projectspace. It might be reasonable to consider merging this with {{double soft redirect}}...
Click to read more »in a couple of months after gaining more experience, particularly in projectspace. WaltonAssistance! 10:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Support, echoing Walton here;...
Click to read more »23:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC) It used to have most of the pages in the projectspace back in 2021. Hasn't been touched by anyone since 2021, and since then...
Click to read more »relisted at AfD, as it was specifically intended for articlespace. In projectspace it's nothing but a duplicate of Wikipedia:Wikipedia logos. Chris Cunningham...
Click to read more »"Project:Revolution", which would inappropriately put the article in projectspace instead of in mainspace. This is one of the rare situations in which...
Click to read more »Readers should not be exposed to projectspace jargon. People interested in project space jargon should search projectspace, to find Wikipedia:Glossary etc...
Click to read more »it only undermines its concept and weakens and muddles it further. A projectspace page that is bad and does not serve the community and cannot be improved...
Click to read more »the projectspace redirect should also be deleted. I thought this was obvious but for the discussion below. I see there are some other projectspace shortcuts...
Click to read more »Reaves (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Cross-namespace redirect to projectspace. This was actually linked in an article (Cartoon physics) until I delinked...
Click to read more »deletion/User:Betacommand/Fair use overuse explanation (keep and move to projectspace) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse (snow keep)...
Click to read more »Specifically, SecurePoll will let a user with 20 mainspace edits and 130 projectspace edits vote, even though the user does not have 150 mainspace edits. Voters...
Click to read more »Find a less destructive way to tidy the large number of overlapping Projectspace pages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Keep - good advice...
Click to read more »Doncram on the talk page convince me that there is no hope for this in projectspace (at least, not on its current trajectory). Doncram's motivation seems...
Click to read more »history should be deleted. If you didn't like the title remaining in projectspace as a redirect, I suggest userfying without redirect before redirecting...
Click to read more »Inexperienced editors have occasionally created pages in projectspace, or moved pages into projectspace from elsewhere, because they mistakenly thought "Wikipedia:"...
Click to read more »projectspace edits and low edit summary use really does suggest more experience is needed here. Candidates must show some time spent in projectspace,...
Click to read more »because SEWilco hasn't been very active lately and because this is in projectspace and not at all used by the project. Nyttend (talk) 00:16, 26 April 2010...
Click to read more »deleted or allowed to stay in userpsace, just that it doesn't belong in projectspace. As an wikipedia-essay, is it quite weak. The recent editing has only...
Click to read more »DAB WP:NG between the two other targets in the hatnote, delete other projectspace redirects. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:54, 27 April 2021...
Click to read more »edit less than two months ago; less than 250 mainspace edits. Only two projectspace edits other than this RfA were to the sandbox. Very concerned about answer...
Click to read more »There is a large amount of additional overlap between the two users, in projectspace too. EIA for two sock accounts The master created Mydreamsparrow's userpage...
Click to read more »to Wikipedia and epilepsy intersection issues, it does not belong in projectspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:10, 5 June 2022 (UTC) Draftspace is not restricted...
Click to read more »not the lowest editcount I've seen at RfA, and I personally think that projectspace edits are as important as mainspace edits for an admin candidate. Although...
Click to read more »without screwing up the whole of projectspace. On the other hand, writing the Signpost quote template in terms of a projectspace template (i.e. wrapper with...
Click to read more »mainspace and is not in projectspace and is not in templatespace then delete. You've already got much of that in the spec, the projectspace and templatespace...
Click to read more »fully believe MfD is the right venue for this discussion. It's a page in projectspace with a non-standard content model, and MfD was literally designed to...
Click to read more »are alternatives to this, and probably much shorter shortcuts in the projectspace too. --Taelus (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC) Retarget as above. We...
Click to read more »first, but if an LTA has a fixation on vandalizing some low-visibility projectspace page or spammy draft, and the vandalism is not particularly obnoxious...
Click to read more »someone thinks there is valuable material in the history for re-use in projectspace. Apologies to User:TenPoundHammer for Wikipedia:Miscellany for...
Click to read more »consensus. Relisting comment: Any further comment regarding moving to projectspace? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk)...
Click to read more »be indexed the way it is? Short answer - pages we'd want to spider in Projectspace are likely to change relatively slowly in number or location. The ones...
Click to read more »User:Cenarium/Protected templates, whose idea it was. It was copied/moved to projectspace on 16:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC). Similar pages from other users, notably...
Click to read more »of Wikipedia:Please bite the newbies (and a bunch of other things in projectspace). I'd probably support broadly userfying humor pages (whether it's funny...
Click to read more »to projectspace are recommendations to move the article to either a subpage of the author's user page, the Draft: namespace, or the projectspace, respectively...
Click to read more »towards adminship in the future I'd advise a little more participation in projectspace - especially more XfD participation - but once you have at least 2500...
Click to read more »are indeed unusual animals. I wouldn't be opposed to moving them into projectspace, even, but that's a separate conversation. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:03...
Click to read more »riots. While most of us will sympathise with opposition to the RSS, the projectspace should not facilitate or encourage any involvement in RSS-related debates...
Click to read more »Something like Wikipedia:Editor's index to Wikipedia, a new page in projectspace as of January 2008, can help. Combine policy articles that overlap to...
Click to read more »creation of this page. Ghinga7 (talk) 17:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC) Most projectspace shortcuts are ambiguous. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete. I would reealy hate to see how much stupid stuff projectspace would have if we created the process for proposals before they actually...
Click to read more »this article isn't it. Not everything funny is nice or suitable for projectspace. Not sure I'd go so far as to call it intimidation though. ++Lar: t/c...
Click to read more »the mainspace, there are two viable options: deletion or a move to the projectspace e.g. WP:COM:OVERWRITE. @Malcolmxl5, EurekaLott, and Amory: pinging participants...
Click to read more »have WP shortcuts, they are serious project pages that could be put in projectspace, except for some reasons. This page is nothing like them. SmokeyJoe (talk)...
Click to read more »namespace since it's not part of the manual of style, and maybe not in projectspace because of MOS:PERIOD, but it should be harmless as a userspace essay...
Click to read more »galore along with the actual list, but this seems problematic both as a projectspace essay and for BLP. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete both (but, you know, especially this one). Both are inappropriate projectspace shortcuts. But another question: WP:Wikipedia is not your COVID Truth...
Click to read more »of list (although there's a good question of whether they belong in projectspace or mainspace). There is a good point about scope here, though. What is...
Click to read more »directly counter to WP:NOTESSAY, a widely accepted policy. Keeping it in projectspace risks confusing any newcomers who might come across it, and it has essentially...
Click to read more »the creator wants that deleted they can tag it. As reasons to delete a projectspace page and a userspace page are different, this MfD's nomination and comments...
Click to read more »userspace or in general projectspace, and that was what the MfD was primarily about -- getting the essay itself out of projectspace. However, I will acknowledge...
Click to read more »to Help:Introduction There was agreement to keep the projectspace redirects pointed to projectspace and Help:Introduction was a popular choice. There was...
Click to read more »opinion as to whether this page should be userfied or maintained as a projectspace essay, but I think it's useful to keep the page around. WaltonOne 17:16...
Click to read more »While National Review may be the only one of those topics discussed in projectspace, I don't think that "NR = National Review" is a common enough association...
Click to read more »09:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC) This are good reasons to kick it out of projectspace, but not good reasons to delete from userspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:25...
Click to read more »distraction because the usernames are no longer left-aligned. Only 3 other projectspace transclusions and none needed a wrapper as much as Wikipedia:Missing...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) I've bundled the other redirect here. Delete both. Mainspace→projectspace XNRs can be worthwhile to readers for topics that brand-new editors might...
Click to read more »of promotional primary sources. At the very least, this should be in projectspace. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »these may be restored at WP:REFUND on a good-faith request to use it in projectspace, in userspace, as a redirect, etc. (Those uses, of course, can be challenged...
Click to read more »what to do with redirects that contain the phrase. I think it's fine in projectspace if titled appropriately, even though, as one person's opinion that seems...
Click to read more »to time). Basically, you're doing very well. Just keep working in the projectspace and on the concerns in your RFAs and you'll continue to do well. (Sorry...
Click to read more »that an article lacks sources isn't a good reason to move it to projectspace. Projectspace pages are to help editors; since the article discusses software...
Click to read more »these seriously -- they're already squirreled away in the bowels of projectspace, and then even further they're squirreled away into a clearly labeled...
Click to read more »Quacks-a-lot (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Weak delete as a useless projectspace page, or userfy. This technically falls under WP:G1, however, I don't...
Click to read more »pages affected: 2950 Namespace(s): Mainspace (mostly), few Userspace and Projectspace pages too Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No; templates will have erroneous...
Click to read more »userfied as new village pump pages (one of the most central venues in projectspace) shouldn't just be created without an RfC, and it shouldn't be up to...
Click to read more »questions. --Mr.98 (talk) 12:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC) Keep Valid use of projectspace. Collect (talk) 11:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC) Keep - The Reference Desk by...
Click to read more »topics. If that is insufficient then also move the resulting page into projectspace (under Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment). --Quiddity 19:59, 22 June...
Click to read more »belongs in their userspace (where I moved it but they don't want it), in projectspace if people besides FloridaArmy see a use for it, or off-wiki if it is...
Click to read more »"potential" a valid reason for deletion, else there are thousands of such projectspace articles to wade through. Collect (talk) 22:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of your contributions are to user talk pages, and you have almost no projectspace contributions. Please come back in six months after addressing those...
Click to read more »edits on talk and user talkpages, plus comparatively lack of edits to projectspace. Nevertheless, I'm happy to support a positive and experienced editor...
Click to read more »of your edits are to the mainspace. You have little experience in the projectspace. Third of all, you aren't active overall anyway. And fourth of all, you...
Click to read more »wikiprojects are almost never successful and just end up cluttering projectspace and diluting attention from other, broader and more viable, collaborations...
Click to read more »completely frivolous and still don't buy the licensing concerns, but projectspace doesn't exist to compile open-source licenses that we don't use. Apparently...
Click to read more »evidence for there not being a primary target; and when it comes to projectspace redirects, to an extent the RfD !voters' impressions themselves are suitable...
Click to read more »edits[1], with almost 4,000 of those in mainspace, over 800 in Wikipedia projectspace and a reasonable spread through all other spaces (even portal! More on...
Click to read more »to be rather inconvenient, and I feel like I should just put them in projectspace. In fact, I had wanted to do this in the first place -- the only reason...
Click to read more »checked OR applies to WP articles -- not to userspace, nor to discussions, projectspace etc. And user is not a "single edit" person on WP, thus should have some...
Click to read more »Support. Sufficient experience; although I agree that some experience in projectspace/processes is important, I don't think that a low number necessarily reflects...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:17, 23 May 2021 (UTC) Userfy as an essay too disputed for projectspace. Not very long ago I had to remove a POV tag from this -- the precedent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia-related policy matter and as such is perfectly appropriate for projectspace. Nsk92 (talk) 04:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC) Keep, per SmokeyJoe. As I've...
Click to read more »a case where a low number of projectspace edits is irrelevant because the user does not intend to monitor projectspaces as an admin. Seems like a good...
Click to read more »June 2009 (UTC) Keep Pointless? Nope. Best essay ever? Nope. Valid in projectspace? Yep. No new reasoning for deletion is given, hence prior result should...
Click to read more »NegativeMP1 17:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Delete or userfy - has no purpose in projectspace. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Delete, there is no...
Click to read more »of it for one's own omphaloskepsis and WP:REICHSTAG antics isn't what projectspace or userspace are for. Especially when the clear intent of it is to glorify...
Click to read more »comment added by Liz (talk • contribs) 23:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Move to projectspace and redirect is probably a decent compromise. I'm not sure how much of...
Click to read more »meaning[1], and blanks user talk page without archiving. Only prior projectspace edits consist of repeatedly vandalizing an AFD discussion and filing...
Click to read more »--WillMak050389 21:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Oppose, lack of experience and projectspace edits. I don't think you're ready to be an admin. Roy A.A. 22:00, 2 July...
Click to read more »This will not affect it's use in project templates on talk pages and in projectspace. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC) move to a subpage...
Click to read more »about possible misuse of extra tools, and without many edits to the projectspace, it's hard to judge if you understand most Wikipedia policy. NSLE (T+C)...
Click to read more »Thanks,--Alabamaboy 16:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Neutral, very little projectspace experience outside of Images for deletion. --Interiot 18:14, 6 January...
Click to read more »watchlist, I see your point. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC) In projectspace, we don’t usually delete history. Deletion doesn’t reduce server space...
Click to read more »behaviours of CUs. I suspect you to be violating WP:SOCK by editing projectspace not using your main account. What prior accounts have you used, and how...
Click to read more »believe that IPs should WP:Register if they want to get involved in projectspace discussions, including deletion discussions. I believe the community...
Click to read more »resource is its contributors. When considering the value of content in projectspace and userspace, don't just inflexibly apply policies and guidelines; think...
Click to read more »date by a bot. Reywas92Talk 22:41, 20 February 2022 (UTC) Why would projectspace be a better location? If a list is of a manageable size and it's being...
Click to read more »written. Sergecross73 msg me 18:53, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Within WP:VG's projectspace you've been a presence in discussions at Manual-of-Style-esque areas...
Click to read more »08:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Weak Support. A little inexperienced in projectspace, but that isn't enough of a reason to oppose, IMO. WaltonOne 16:30, 18...
Click to read more »can work in portalspace just as well as it can in category space or projectspace (e.g. Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia). Nyttend (talk) 23:27, 26 April...
Click to read more »appriciate that this makes RfA not empty, but still, the lack of any projectspace edits means that I don't know how you would handle XfDs an the like....
Click to read more »indication that this has ever received enough discussion to be in Wikipedia: projectspace. This belongs on the Village Pump if it's intended to be WP-wide, or...
Click to read more »'rogue subpages'). The project is older than the week-old WP:MMO in projectspace (MMO spending months unedited, forgotten, on a user subpage) and has...
Click to read more »Steel1943 (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Delete. This is a CNR out of projectspace, which is significantly less problematic than the reverse, but we shouldn't...
Click to read more »21:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Neutral. I'd like to see more work around the projectspace and in admin-related tasks. An admin coach would also be a big help for...
Click to read more »section. The result of the discussion was Soft redirect after move to projectspace. I read a rough agreement here that the redirect shouldn't be in mainspace...
Click to read more »content, as it contradicts our core mission, censorship in userspace and projectspace is entirely legitimate, as inoffensive content is more likely to build...
Click to read more »impressive set of contributions. I fail to understand how participation in projectspace is necessary to understanding what's in it. We need more writer-admins...
Click to read more »stats shows only 57 user Talk edits, 549 article space edits and 176 projectspace edits. Instant advice would be to get involved with projects, start talking...
Click to read more »as they are unrelated to the encyclopedia, we need to get rid of the projectspace links. --Cyde Weys 04:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:GUS, assuming...
Click to read more »page. TbhotchTalk C. 06:32, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Move to portalspace, or projectspace. This is a selfreferential non-article. Portal:Main Page or Wikipedia:Main...
Click to read more »the fact that 108 of his 631 edits are in projectspace, indicating prolific participation in XfDs. Projectspace experience is the most important thing for...
Click to read more »projectspace or draftspace pages. With its closure, now we're left with a gaping hole, where the previous formal process for nominating projectspace pages...
Click to read more »this position. --WillMak050389 21:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Oppose, lack of projectspace edits concerns me. Roy A.A. 22:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Oppose. Your talk...
Click to read more »Oppose 500 edits might be passable, except that you have next to no projectspace edits. Adminship is not about writing articles, so article contributions...
Click to read more »would support you but you focus twice as much on your userspace than on projectspace; however, i cannot obviously oppose on you. As of right now, i am stable...
Click to read more »dormant WikiProject to demand deletion. We do not delete unproblematic projectspace pages which were initiated with the intent of advancing the project....
Click to read more »retargeted to Glossary of anime and manga#H. Please don't point it back to projectspace again. -- Gurch (talk) 12:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Do we really need...
Click to read more »There is no reason why we can't move it to either projectspace or userspace, but if we opt for projectspace, it still might be best tagged with {{humor}}...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Delete crossnamespace redirects to projectspace pages. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 05:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Week keep. I...
Click to read more »participation in XfD.--Húsönd 18:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose - rather low projectspace edits. And there's the age thing. How do I say this diplomatically? Admins...
Click to read more »you're on the right track; keep contributing, start testing the waters in projectspace, and come back in six months. //roux 03:09, 13 December 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »inappropriateness of the use of user categories. If judged inappriopriate for Projectspace, please Userfy for me, for my continuing study of the politics of ArbCom...
Click to read more »made to this section. The result of the discussion was Disambig/Move to projectspace. Consensus seems to be on the side that this should not exist, as least...
Click to read more »normally be welcomed, then I'd say that merits being kept. If this were projectspace, it would be different. But it's userspace, it's helpful, and it should...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia ban speedrun. Projectspace, userspace, same difference.—Alalch E. 16:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »than with vandals. However, wait about another month, rack up some more projectspace and mainspace edits, then I'll nominate you. Don't jump in too early...
Click to read more »something new to say (and I'm not exactly sure simply bringing up three projectspace pages–including NOTTEMPORARY, which is not normally used as a rationale...
Click to read more »familiar. Joe 02:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Support, I can overlook the projectspace issue. (300 wikispace edits is fine imo)--Wizardman 02:33, 6 April 2007...
Click to read more »depend on the agriculture one, which appears to have been created in projectspace as some sort of article directory before being moved to mainspace and...
Click to read more »as {{Humor}}. You're not imposing on others simply by putting this in projectspace; "imposing" would be something like an attempt to put this into a policy...
Click to read more »comes up. Only seven pages link to the ZWSP character, and the rest are projectspace or userspace pages, not templates that might be transcluded at the Chagos...
Click to read more »saberwyn 06:26, 22 May 2010 (UTC) The big problem here is that while projectspace articles can either elide references altogether or use primary sources...
Click to read more »discussion was delete. While there hasn't been an established rule against projectspace-to-userspace redirects until now, there seems to be a consensus forming...
Click to read more »than 1,000 edits in over one and a half years. No indication of real projectspace work. – Chacor 14:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose The lack of experience...
Click to read more »--Shizane 15:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC) Support, superb answers. Despite the low projectspace edits, I can see you're very involved in Wikipedia. Roy A.A. 19:52, 15...
Click to read more »copyright license to their informed consent document Report in this projectspace what response the researchers have to the request If the researchers...
Click to read more »User:Theleekycauldron/refract. The last touches would just be putting the tables in projectspace instead. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:35, 24 March 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »waaay below most standards. Not enough experience, let alone in the projectspace, and mediocre edit summary usage (27% for major edits) in addition to...
Click to read more »a close call, the active editor who contributes non-COI article and projectspace edits will be allowed substantial leeway in userpage content. Second...
Click to read more »Macon using an undeclared alternative account, Dalek Supreme X, to edit projectspace. These diffs demonstrate Guy continuing an interaction that began on...
Click to read more »developed a primacy and it is therefore too late for what would be ideal projectspace disambiguation in this case), and the upper and lowercase version should...
Click to read more »PAIN is gone, one would expect RFA candidates to have twigged. Minimal projectspace editing, I do not find myself confident that this user knows policy sufficiently...
Click to read more »support the essay for addressing a serious issue. Such essays belong in projectspace. This is not to say that I agree with the proposed solution. I agree...
Click to read more »02:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC) Support - Exellent contributions to the projectspace. --Hirohisat Kiwi 02:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC) Support per above. NHRHS2010...
Click to read more »have enough experience in the Projectspace. Now, this "weakness" is totally cured. She has racked up 1,400+ projectspace edits and ample experience in...
Click to read more »different usages all over Wikipedia between articlespace, categories, and projectspace. This was the case even before the big May CFD, which was one of many...
Click to read more »development. This is a potentially useful worklist for researchers in projectspace, absolutely, but for mainspace it's an indiscriminate collection of original...
Click to read more »are all there with the bot-work an additional plus. I imagine that the projectspace and user Talk edits will increase dramatically after the admin tools...
Click to read more »proposed target is more closely associated with the notion of historical projectspace pages. WP:DEMOTE does not currently exist, and would as a fitting alternative...
Click to read more »page will be a subpage of the HWY Cup page in the WikiProject Highways projectspace. It should also be linked to after the signature of each contestant on...
Click to read more »wants to do this, by all means try it. But I don't think it should be in projectspace. —BorgHunter (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Delete or userfy per...
Click to read more »15:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Neutral I don't see much activity in the projectspace. Edit summary usage needs work. -- Anas Talk? 17:17, 3 February 2007...
Click to read more »accountability. If they have registered, they are violating WP:SOCK by editing projectspace logged out. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:09, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Regardless...
Click to read more »cross-namespace redirect. We should avoid redirecting from mainspace to projectspace material that's not aimed at readers. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »DaGizza regularly cleans up vandalism, and interacts regularly on the projectspace, as well as AfDs and RfAs. I think this is why he and all of us at the...
Click to read more »No consensus. Cenarium Talk 15:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC) CNR to the projectspace, does not link to content, not needed for historical purposes. MBisanz...
Click to read more »Wikiproject in question. The target page does, despite it's location in projectspace, appear to have some use to it. If someone were looking for info on airline...
Click to read more »page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was move to projectspace. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Template:Worcs Mar2010 (talk ·...
Click to read more »careful. It's easy to make big (and small) mistakes with it. Mainspace to Projectspace ratio. You're doing pretty well, but I'd like to say that you should...
Click to read more »September 2012 (UTC) I don't mind them being kept, but they belong in projectspace. They are not general-use templates: they are documentation. Chris Cunningham...
Click to read more »(UTC) Oppose Oppose, only active in recent months and only 9 edits to projectspace (as of toolserver lag). Edit summary usage is "meh" at best, with just...
Click to read more »manuals and the like, and could be deployed more widely throughout our projectspace tutorials. I don't think an appropriate merge target has been identified...
Click to read more »than 100 edits to the help desk, he has shown that he can handle the projectspace side of things perfectly well. I am confident that giving him the mop...
Click to read more »has been extremely active recently in arguing for the deletion of the projectspace page Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit. Evidence leads me to suspect he...
Click to read more »archiving or tagging historical is not good enough. Normally, deletion of projectspace pages should be reserved for things that should not have been created...
Click to read more »sides scenario or... NPOV doesn't apply to projectspace, but what we say about neutrality in projectspace matters (it's where the policy lives, after...
Click to read more »(UTC) Us, as a project. We shouldn't take ourselves too seriously in projectspace. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Keep all. Thin-skinned...
Click to read more »Smithsonian, Cochrane, CRUK, etc. A relevant distinction here seems like projectspace vs. a "WikiProject" in particular. WikiProjects are usually for coordinating...
Click to read more »(UTC) SecurePoll is a de facto extension of projectspace. Thus I support disallowing users with projectspace blocks. I also think that ElectCom should be...
Click to read more »it gains more traction, then it may be considered for return to the projectspace in the future. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 07:56, 23 July 2026 (UTC) Support userfy...
Click to read more »discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Keep, or move to projectspace - There are a lot of these lists. They've been around since the early...
Click to read more »until that happens all we're left with is choosing the most appropriate projectspace page to point to. The most literally correct one would be WP:SPI, but...
Click to read more »clear enough understanding of policy to cover the (comparatively) low projectspace count. This user is an outstanding editor, but doesn't strike me as appropriate...
Click to read more »shouldn't try their hand at an 'alternative' Signpost, but not in the projectspace, please. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Strong delete...
Click to read more »support. ArcAngel (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC) Weak Support. Very low projectspace edit count, but I still think that this user won't delete the main page...
Click to read more »Icewhiz (talk · contribs), who added this, supports it's location in projectspace. Otherwise, userfy as a disputed single author essay. In either case...
Click to read more »some vandal fighting, you don't seem to have any experience in other projectspace areas. There seemed to have a problem with orphaned non-free image too...
Click to read more »without investing too much into any individual one. If you ever feel projectspace discussions get too intense, go ahead and take a break to work on those...
Click to read more »project space. ElinorD (talk) 11:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Support. More projectspace contribs would have helped me make up my mind sooner, but candidate seems...
Click to read more »mainspace edits (and no content development), and little activity in projectspace, I'm not sure why you need +sysop right now. Also, I'm a bit put-off...
Click to read more »(6 years, 68 days) Longest undetected patent nonsense page outside of projectspace: Talk:Sombrero Galaxy/ ("the sobrereo galaxy fat ") from 22 January 2018...
Click to read more »There seems to be a pattern of this user making controversial essays in projectspace during disputes. Does WP:CRYNPA also need some eyes on it? –Novem Linguae...
Click to read more »for this combination of two common words to instead link to an obscure projectspace subpage. No backlinks, low pageviews, and of course no way to know if...
Click to read more »we're dealing with userspace, not an article subpage or miscelaneous projectspace page. The bar for deletion of a userspace page is much higher, as people...
Click to read more »barnstars on his page!) - friendly. All-rounder in mainspace, talk, projectspace and images. Personally, I've found Coredesat to be helpful, communicative...
Click to read more »wiki space. Shyam (T/C) 10:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC) Oppose, not enough projectspace edits. Royboycrashfan 11:56, 18 April 2006 (UTC) Oppose per Slimvirgin...
Click to read more »the same way as a previous confirmed sock, diving right into advanced projectspace. DanCherek (talk) 14:59, 22 June 2022 (UTC) Accused parties may also...
Click to read more »was started, and January 8, 2008, when it was moved from userspace to projectspace, was done by John Broughton. Cross-reference Index (publishing) Ontology...
Click to read more »discussion was delete. I'm generally in favor of such things — amusing projectspace redirects are amusing — but 78 pageviews in 2 years ain't use, and the...
Click to read more »Contribs 20:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Delete, but R2 specifically excludes projectspace. --NYKevin @228, i.e. 04:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Delete all – unnecessary...
Click to read more »it out of articlespace: I'd personally like it excised from those few projectspace pages which use it as well, which means that it will just be yet another...
Click to read more »resource is its contributors. When considering the value of content in projectspace and userspace, don't just inflexibly apply policies and guidelines; think...
Click to read more »and the oppose concerns are mostly trivial (Xoloz is right that more projectspace experience would be better, though). Walton Need some help? 16:07, 1...
Click to read more »anything but article building. In his last 500 edits, 18 were to the Projectspace with five being to RfA's. I understand that this user wants the tools...
Click to read more »importantly, its purpose/use. This is not simply a log. Those already exist in projectspace. It's also not material being prepared for use in a forthcoming case...
Click to read more »February 2009 (UTC). Looks good for the most part. CSD tagging and thin projectspace contributions aren't a major negative for me at the moment, but may keep...
Click to read more »then there'll almost always be a home in mainspace or projectspace. By contrast, projectspace does contain well recognized, stable, pages about wikipedia/wikimedia...
Click to read more »mainspace redirects to projectspace. Cross-namespace redirects like these should have a higher burden than regular shortcuts from projectspace. Given the corrected...
Click to read more »20:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC) Sorry, but I don't feel you have nearly enough projectspace edits. Over several years, you have less than 300 edits to WP/WT pages...
Click to read more »question here is, are all essays with some link to Wikipedia welcome in projectspace? These two have received essentially no visitors, are linked from nowhere...
Click to read more »redirects is an active hindrance to anyone searching for the correct projectspace page. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »history • stats) Recently created as an article, but redirected to projectspace to get rid of it. Unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Edited to add:...
Click to read more »either no experience in the projectspace but did have clue and so could easily adapt, or had no interest in working in projectspace but still worked very well...
Click to read more »will be a good admin in the future, but you need more experience in projectspace. I also suggest that you spend time participating in RfA's and other...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is needless and a clear violation of WP:NOT". This is not what projectspace was designed for. Wikipedia:Hangman/Games 1-10 Wikipedia:Hangman/Games...
Click to read more »(bark • sniff) 02:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC) Err, what? If it weren't projectspace, it'd be main->main, which is clearly not an R2. This may be a cross-namespace...
Click to read more »9 December 2006 (UTC) Weak support per lack of WP talk edits. 1400 projectspace edits definitely helps with that. -Amarkov blahedits 14:53, 9 December...
Click to read more »because the WP:X pseudo-namespace, although we use it for redirects to projectspace, is technically in mainspace (where essays do not belong), so, if kept...
Click to read more »Oppose Sorry, but the answers don't indicate a need for the tools, and projectspace count is too low. Yanksox (talk) 14:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC) Oppose per...
Click to read more »is NOT Wikipedia project. Am I (and everyone else) entitled to create projectspace wp:REDIRECTs to arbitrary userspace pages? Alsee (talk) 16:32, 27 July...
Click to read more »well. --Siva1979Talk to me 13:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Support great projectspace edit count. -Icewedge 17:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Please tell me that's...
Click to read more »--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 05:14, 20 October 2018 (UTC) Keep - Redirect shortcuts from projectspace to userspace are common and acceptable. That aside, this is not the place...
Click to read more »Oppose I'm impressed with your mainspace contributions. However, you need projectspace contributions, to show you are familiar with policy, and you only have...
Click to read more »MOS:BEGINMOS:BEGIN → Wikipedia:Lead section Inappropriate mainspace → projectspace redirect. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC) Note: There are...
Click to read more »resource is its contributors. When considering the value of content in projectspace and userspace, don't just inflexibly apply policies and guidelines; think...
Click to read more »one doesn't really see unless one searches for it or spends time in projectspace. BigNate37(T) 14:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC) Delete, it's unlikely to be...
Click to read more »2021. And also because it's a pointless redirect from draft projectspace to main projectspace. EeJayEss2008 (talk) 09:29, 27 August 2022 (UTC) Weak keep:...
Click to read more »project then if there were a strong consensus that it didn't belong in projectspace it could be userfied. However, I can't see any real harm in the status...
Click to read more »is obvious that this is his forté. Mjroots has not been silent in the projectspace, however. He has made 100 contributions to AIV and would be useful helping...
Click to read more »keep it clearly marks areas for gathering data as a talkspace subpage, projectspace subpage, or userspace subpage and work area, and not for demarcating...
Click to read more »cross-namespace redirect. We should avoid redirecting from mainspace to projectspace material that's not aimed at readers. This one in particular is likely...
Click to read more »stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] Inappropriate mainspace -> projectspace redirect. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC) Why...
Click to read more »support me for adminship without a higher proportion of mainspace edits to projectspace edits. Ratio of edits is an absurd criterion, but whatever. I won't be...
Click to read more »to User:Masem/Trainspotting. Redirects, including shortcuts, from the projectspace to the userspace are acceptable and useful. I disagree that they are...
Click to read more »excellent editor and an very nice person. I like your contributions to projectspace debates (try CfD, RfD, and TfD, if you're feeling bold). Keep working...
Click to read more »"Wikipedia's non-free content policy forbids displaying non-free images in projectspace. It is acceptable to have free images, GFDL-images, Creative Commons...
Click to read more »sure. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC) Keep Valid use of projectspace for an essay. Collect (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC) The article states...
Click to read more »Signpost would meet that requirement too. If this is moved to portalspace/projectspace, then the Signpost should be as well. jc37 12:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of list (although there's a good question of whether they belong in projectspace or mainspace). There is a good point about scope here, though. What is...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:12, 10 August 2026 (UTC) Keep. This was intended as a special ProjectSpace page tracking the works of a prominant jurnalist in covering Wikipedia...
Click to read more »the mainspace; there's very little activity elsewhere, especially in projectspace. In fact, there doesn't seem to be an edit to project talk space, and...
Click to read more »however, the view runs contrary to core principles and shouldn't be in projectspace. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:57, 26 March 2023 (UTC) Keep as a valid...
Click to read more »received, but deletion here and now is not consistent with past freedom in projectspace. Nomination gives no good reason given for deletion. There is no “creation...
Click to read more »overlap: in particular, both editing about Taylor Lorenz, including in projectspace Interaction overlap: adverse interactions with Awshort without disclosing...
Click to read more »Problems... Naming a ref tag legal defense fund--Jammie Thomas What is Projectspace? Rearranging sections in an article Attempted retrieval of lost edit...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Archive and delete the resulting redirect. This is effectively projectspace, and the edit history is probably worth preserving even though it hasn't...
Click to read more »can be original thought! A.Z. 03:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Keep. This is projectspace page enlightens some and harms none. Essays that aren't attack pages...
Click to read more »increase in server load. Were we discussing whether or not to create this projectspace redirect, I would be saying no. BigNate37(T) 20:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »mainspace and one for projectspace. Both are strictly separated: The mainspace account never edits the Wikipedia namespace, the projectspace account never edits...
Click to read more »community, let the community properly manage it. Thus: move back to projectspace, else keep as is. ~ PseudoSudo 23:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC) Keep. I've...
Click to read more »