Redirect to:
Shortcut WP:PRURLWP:PRURL In June 2015, Wikipedia did a "hard enable" of HTTPS meaning the site is 100% HTTPS. Because protocol relative is relative to...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Nice. There is also sometimes very rarely protocol relative (WP:PRURL) eg. {{cite web |url=//twitter.com}}. They are so uncommon and can be tricky...
Click to read more »all of the old discussions. The page mentions only archive.org, but isn't PRURL recommended for YouTube? Any others that we know of? ―Mandruss ☎ 15:55,...
Click to read more »https://www. or //www.. However, PRURL does seem to irritate or confuse people. I remember when I used to convert links to PRURL, other people complained to...
Click to read more »is saying we don't support protocol relative URLs. WP:PRURL has some past discussions about PRURLs on certain sites, but I can't find anything about forcing...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) @Pigsonthewing: There is no policy, but we do have an essay, WP:PRURL. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC) WP:EL mentions it at WP:External...
Click to read more »--Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:28, 2 October 2016 (UTC) The above doesn't find WP:PRURLs or [https://en.wikipedia.org [[bar]] lorem]. Give \[(?:https?:)?\/\/[^\s]+...
Click to read more »not, it shouldn't. DES (talk) 22:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC) See also WP:PRURL -- GreenC 14:42, 17 September 2014 (UTC) There is a clear consensus to "Use...
Click to read more »site offers the same content via both http: and https: we should use WP:PRURLs and not express a preference for either form. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:19,...
Click to read more »website. But Wikipedia is rendering the link as HTTPS. More info at WP:PRURL and Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Protocol_relative_URLs. It's probably...
Click to read more »parsing with my script for unlimited levels, and code for exceptions like WP:PRURL and other short-hand forms that come up. URLs can get pretty messy. Too...
Click to read more »