Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
details or to provide the subject's viewpoint. Shortcut WP:PRSOURCEWP:PRSOURCE A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually written...
Click to read more »MolecularPilot 09:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Adding that the "news" article is a WP:PRSOURCE and can't prove notability. also this "award" (if you can call it that)...
Click to read more »press releases, and other non-independent sources ([7], [8], [9]); WP:PRSOURCE-driven coverage in WP:TRADES publications ([10], [11], [12]); and a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE...
Click to read more »references belong to blogs and recondite trade publications or fall under WP:PRSOURCE, and the claims of working on various Hollywood projects are totally unsourced...
Click to read more »her [3] and a press release which can't count towards notability per WP:PRSOURCE [4]. She also doesn't meet the more specific WP:NACTOR either, which requires...
Click to read more »multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...
Click to read more »mix of WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS or affiliated/non-independent sources like WP:PRSOURCE and official bios. Nothing else useful found in WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971...
Click to read more »multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...
Click to read more »are not WP:RS and this one is reliable (though it might fall under WP:PRSOURCE, I am not sure yet). 1 RS is still not enough, though admittedly I did...
Click to read more »multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...
Click to read more »Reuters Press Release mentioned above generally do not qualify (see WP:PRSOURCE). Further, I am not aware that the notability criteria is satisfied by...
Click to read more »America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:PRSOURCE nearly all the sources on the page are non-significant, so this fails WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »are obviously some sources just based on company press release (see WP:PRSOURCE. There is nothing that could be called independent. Farooqahmadbhat (talk)...
Click to read more »statement cannot be reliable or considered to be from a WP:NPOV. Per WP:PRSOURCE "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability and should...
Click to read more »is a PR news release.. Joojay (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC) See WP:PRSOURCE. The TechRadar source is not significant coverage, per WP:CORPDEPTH. The...
Click to read more »are from various incarnations of the Sci-Fi Channel's own websites (WP:PRSOURCE). 1 is from Dial the Gate, a Stargate fan podcast (so would also struggle...
Click to read more »Newswire is not a newspaper, it is a distributor of press releases and per WP:PRSOURCE what you get from it does not count towards notability. The Multifamilybiz...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Delete. Sources are WP:ORGTRIV, WP:PRSOURCE, WP:TRADES or some combination thereof. Fails WP:NCORP and very close to...
Click to read more »company that are reprinted elsewhere are not independent sources. See WP:PRSOURCE. --MarioGom (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC) MarioGom: your right, but...
Click to read more »posting a message here, unfortunately, it does not appear to be a good source, see WP:PRSOURCE and its about us page Justiyaya 16:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »is totally not congruent with what is in the article. Additionally, WP:PRSOURCE says we can not use press releases as sources, which means you cannot use...
Click to read more »press releases, which aren't indicative of notability according to WP:PRSOURCE, so I agree. Aamri2 (talk) 21:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »GNG terms - if that were so where on earth would that lead? Well, see WP:PRSOURCE. Regardless, I did miss the actualitte/mymodernmet sources which are plainly...
Click to read more »the opening act. Regarding the other two articles, what makes them WP:PRSOURCE ("promos") or on what basis are "people to watch" type articles excluded...
Click to read more »coverage such as press releases [...] is not significant coverage", WP:PRSOURCE "A press release is clearly not an independent source"), so bringing it...
Click to read more »Comment: Two of the ITO sources are press releases and therefore fail WP:PRSOURCE, while the "Digital Platforms and Services" page only contains a single...
Click to read more »Talk! 08:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC) Delete as current references are WP:PRSOURCEs either from the US or Iraq governments and "cannot be used towards claims...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Article created by a UPE/COI editor, consisting largely of WP:PRSOURCEs. I cannot find reliable, independent coverage of the subject and his company...
Click to read more »09:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC) FYI, I have updated the above analysis. See WP:PRSOURCE. A press release doesn’t need to directly come from Hive Colab. It can...
Click to read more »press release, or press announcement on about the same date, and per WP:PRSOURCE "Press releases and articles written from press releases cannot be used...
Click to read more »thus WP:PRIMARYSOURCEs ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]) WP:PRSOURCEs ([10], [11]) Churnalism based on interviews solely with or statements...
Click to read more »limited number of WP:PRSOURCEs. In an article about an individual visual novel, we can disclose this potential bias in a PRSOURCE implicitly by stating...
Click to read more »Finance page is a press release, which are classed as non-independent at WP:PRSOURCE. I have also consulted the article you mentioned. (Here's a link if other...
Click to read more »See WP:SHUKANBUNSHUN Shortcut WP:JAPANPRWP:JAPANPR Per WP:PRSOURCE, A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually...
Click to read more »used for the first time on the succeeding edits. As keeping with the WP:PRSOURCE, the supposedly WP:RS is entitled "Here's What Fans Are Saying". Howard...
Click to read more »not WP:SIGCOV. As for WP:NFILMMAKER, I saw news coverage (but more WP:PRSOURCEs of some film festival category wins, but no reviews of his work in independent...
Click to read more »independent. At the top it says "Пресс-релизы," or press release See WP:PRSOURCE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC) Is this one a press release...
Click to read more »N A press release posted by Drysdale's company on BusinessWire. Per WP:PRSOURCE, A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually...
Click to read more »fails WP:NCORP. All the coverage available consists of press releases (WP:PRSOURCE), niche WP:TRADES publications not contributing to notability, and WP:ORGTRIV...
Click to read more »seems like conflict of interest and rather WP:SELF primary source and WP:PRSOURCE. The tweets amount to their company's own press releases. The burden to...
Click to read more »in race series. The general concern outlined for press releases at WP:PRSOURCE seems to be focused on how press releases can include undue praise. Also...
Click to read more »Dario Item's role as Ambassador of Antigua and Barbuda. NO evidence of WP:PRSOURCE as User:Arcaist claims. O'Murchu, Cynthia; Smith, Robert; Ashworth, Louis;...
Click to read more »articles but it can be used cautiously for other assertions per Wikipedia:PRSOURCE, such as uncontroversial fact. And as mentioned above, ST is independent...
Click to read more »releases are never reliable sources because they are not independent, see WP:PRSOURCE. Anyone can issue a press release. shoy (reactions) 19:33, 13 February...
Click to read more »run of the mill information, probably based on a press release. See WP:PRSOURCE. Autocar might work as one source, but it only has two sentences about...
Click to read more »Arguably the Business Wire source is a press release and would fall under WP:PRSOURCE. Brandon (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC) I'm now officially confused...
Click to read more »20:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC) @Sucker for All, please read WP:PRSOURCE. You are literally arguing with people who have tens of thousands of edits...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »which means they are not independent and can't establish notability (WP:PRSOURCE). Coverage of a student's murder does not lend notability to the school...
Click to read more »independent, reliable sources. They are limited to WP:INTERVIEWS, WP:PRSOURCEs, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. His awards are the kind of "30 under 30" cruft...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »maybe), but maybe somewhat less so and at least it's independent and not PRSOURCE. Given the coverage and article both focus on it as a business entity and...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »not possible to write a non-PROMO encyclopedia article exclusively from PRSOURCEs. With respect to Timothytyy, CastJared and our IP contributor here, I...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »presumed significant coverage and must be independent of the subject. WP:PRSOURCE clearly states that "A press release is clearly not an independent source...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC) Cfaso2000, about source 7, see WP:PRSOURCE. Best, Reading Beans 08:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »release with a little added text. For our purposes, it's a republished WP:PRSOURCE. The Seattle Times's first reference has Johnson mentioned twice for an...
Click to read more »should be but when I said, press release, I am referring to this guide: WP:PRSOURCE. As you have shown above, the sources that validates the existence of this...
Click to read more »agency "AA" source only quotes a Hamas press release verbatim, see WP:PRSOURCE - "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability". Marokwitz...
Click to read more »noted above, this is a near-verbatim reprint of a press release, see WP:PRSOURCE, from Cooley's company and thus not independent. Irish Times: an obituary...
Click to read more »is totally not congruent with what is in the article. Additionally, WP:PRSOURCE says we can not use press releases as sources, which means you cannot use...
Click to read more »but otherwise good catch with the source of the article. I've add WP:PRSOURCE to the relevent box. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »does apply here with regards to a government press release (see also WP:PRSOURCE). ABOUTSELF applies to each source individually, so a PR statement by the...
Click to read more »reference is basically a press release, and also isn't evidence per WP:PRSOURCE. I feel like there's not really anything left that indicates notability...
Click to read more »type of coverage does not help establish notability. See WP:ORGIND and WP:PRSOURCE. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC) @Greg c1988: InterGame...
Click to read more »and WP:SIGCOV. None of the sources you assessed as press releases are WP:PRSOURCE and all provide significant coverage of the subject. - Robertjamal12 ~🔔...
Click to read more »was in the tweets, they are not independent secondary sources. See WP:PRSOURCE. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:23, 28 September 2025 (UTC) @Usedtobecool NORG states...
Click to read more »references belong to blogs and recondite trade publications or fall under WP:PRSOURCE, and the claims of working on various Hollywood projects are totally unsourced...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Hi, Hardyisback11188. Please see WP:PRSOURCE for why not one of the sources you listed (ignoring the fact that they're...
Click to read more »Reuters Press Release mentioned above generally do not qualify (see WP:PRSOURCE). Further, I am not aware that the notability criteria is satisfied by...
Click to read more »be referred. *There is a useful guidline on press-release sources: WP:PRSOURCE. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC) Gpkp, you or I may believe...
Click to read more »Newswire is not a newspaper, it is a distributor of press releases and per WP:PRSOURCE what you get from it does not count towards notability. The Multifamilybiz...
Click to read more »in race series. The general concern outlined for press releases at WP:PRSOURCE seems to be focused on how press releases can include undue praise. Also...
Click to read more »best---- work? Sweeto dweeto (talk) 20:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC) No. See WP:PRSOURCE. casualdejekyll 21:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC) Sweeto dweeto, press releases...
Click to read more »company that are reprinted elsewhere are not independent sources. See WP:PRSOURCE. --MarioGom (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC) MarioGom: your right, but...
Click to read more »press release, or press announcement on about the same date, and per WP:PRSOURCE "Press releases and articles written from press releases cannot be used...
Click to read more »is a PR news release.. Joojay (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC) See WP:PRSOURCE. The TechRadar source is not significant coverage, per WP:CORPDEPTH. The...
Click to read more »GNG terms - if that were so where on earth would that lead? Well, see WP:PRSOURCE. Regardless, I did miss the actualitte/mymodernmet sources which are plainly...
Click to read more »20:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC) @Sucker for All, please read WP:PRSOURCE. You are literally arguing with people who have tens of thousands of edits...
Click to read more »Finance page is a press release, which are classed as non-independent at WP:PRSOURCE. I have also consulted the article you mentioned. (Here's a link if other...
Click to read more »which means they are not independent and can't establish notability (WP:PRSOURCE). Coverage of a student's murder does not lend notability to the school...
Click to read more »are obviously some sources just based on company press release (see WP:PRSOURCE. There is nothing that could be called independent. Farooqahmadbhat (talk)...
Click to read more »the recommendations outlined at WP:NFCHAR. Most of them are either WP:PRSOURCEs or else reviews of the series in general which only mention Yomiko in...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »sources can be used to demonstrate notability. You may want to review WP:PRSOURCE and WP:COISOURCE. —BrechtBro (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) Wikipedia:Independent...
Click to read more »31 July 2026 (UTC) None of the sources in the article are churnalism/WP:PRSOURCE, not even the Daily Breeze piece. Additional sources exist beyond what's...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »not written by a contributor. I don't think it's fair to flag it as WP:PRSOURCE, given that the focus of the article is very much on GraphBLAS and its...
Click to read more »Print is a press release and is not at all independent nor reliable per WP:PRSOURCE. Please share your “reliable sources” here. GrabUp - Talk 01:57, 21 July...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »Dario Item's role as Ambassador of Antigua and Barbuda. NO evidence of WP:PRSOURCE as User:Arcaist claims. O'Murchu, Cynthia; Smith, Robert; Ashworth, Louis;...
Click to read more »}}—curated from the article but said press release was not linked. WP:PRSOURCE I don’t consider this reliable per this link not really ✘ No https://encomium...
Click to read more »er-avab-personaalnaituse Roughly half of the text is quotes, likely WP:PRSOURCE "simply recycling a press release (a practice called 'churnalism')." WP:ROUTINE...
Click to read more »reliable when it's just recycling a press-release. See churnalism and WP:PRSOURCE. As for this discussion, this seems to be a formal part II in which we...
Click to read more »limited number of WP:PRSOURCEs. In an article about an individual visual novel, we can disclose this potential bias in a PRSOURCE implicitly by stating...
Click to read more »}}—curated from the article but said press release was not linked. WP:PRSOURCE I don’t consider this reliable per this link not really ✘ No https://encomium...
Click to read more »These two have identical copy, indicating that they they likely just WP:PRSOURCEs and not independent journalism. ~ Presumably accurate information about...
Click to read more »but otherwise good catch with the source of the article. I've add WP:PRSOURCE to the relevent box. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »without providing any coverage. Thus, these spoilers should be treated as WP:PRSOURCE, following the sentence "Many less reputable news sources will write an...
Click to read more »press releases, and other non-independent sources ([24], [25], [26]); WP:PRSOURCE-driven coverage in WP:TRADES publications ([27], [28], [29]); and a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE...
Click to read more »MolecularPilot 09:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Adding that the "news" article is a WP:PRSOURCE and can't prove notability. also this "award" (if you can call it that)...
Click to read more »are from various incarnations of the Sci-Fi Channel's own websites (WP:PRSOURCE). 1 is from Dial the Gate, a Stargate fan podcast (so would also struggle...
Click to read more »reference is basically a press release, and also isn't evidence per WP:PRSOURCE. I feel like there's not really anything left that indicates notability...
Click to read more »and WP:SIGCOV. None of the sources you assessed as press releases are WP:PRSOURCE and all provide significant coverage of the subject. - Robertjamal12 ~🔔...
Click to read more »These two have identical copy, indicating that they they likely just WP:PRSOURCEs and not independent journalism. ~ Presumably accurate information about...
Click to read more »not possible to write a non-PROMO encyclopedia article exclusively from PRSOURCEs. With respect to Timothytyy, CastJared and our IP contributor here, I...
Click to read more »09:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC) FYI, I have updated the above analysis. See WP:PRSOURCE. A press release doesn’t need to directly come from Hive Colab. It can...
Click to read more »Business Today. July 23, 2024. "Impact Feature" as the writer implies WP:PRSOURCE. Press release. ~ Somewhat goes into detail about Battle for Dream Island...
Click to read more »er-avab-personaalnaituse Roughly half of the text is quotes, likely WP:PRSOURCE "simply recycling a press release (a practice called 'churnalism')." WP:ROUTINE...
Click to read more »should be but when I said, press release, I am referring to this guide: WP:PRSOURCE. As you have shown above, the sources that validates the existence of this...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Delete. Sources are WP:ORGTRIV, WP:PRSOURCE, WP:TRADES or some combination thereof. Fails WP:NCORP and very close to...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC) Cfaso2000, about source 7, see WP:PRSOURCE. Best, Reading Beans 08:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »release with a little added text. For our purposes, it's a republished WP:PRSOURCE. The Seattle Times's first reference has Johnson mentioned twice for an...
Click to read more »for Wikipedia articles (see Wikipedia:Independent sources, especially WP:PRSOURCE) and do not contribute to notability (see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations...
Click to read more »her [26] and a press release which can't count towards notability per WP:PRSOURCE [27]. She also doesn't meet the more specific WP:NACTOR either, which requires...
Click to read more »Arguably the Business Wire source is a press release and would fall under WP:PRSOURCE. Brandon (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC) I'm now officially confused...
Click to read more »mix of WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS or affiliated/non-independent sources like WP:PRSOURCE and official bios. Nothing else useful found in WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971...
Click to read more »pertaining to the label you're using.” He is not ready to accept what WP:PRSOURCE says: “A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually...
Click to read more »articles but it can be used cautiously for other assertions per Wikipedia:PRSOURCE, such as uncontroversial fact. And as mentioned above, ST is independent...
Click to read more »verbatim from the museum's About page. The website should be considered WP:PRSOURCE. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 12:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC) To add to my earlier comment...
Click to read more »Comment: Two of the ITO sources are press releases and therefore fail WP:PRSOURCE, while the "Digital Platforms and Services" page only contains a single...
Click to read more »below for FSF cite). David_Gerard, Even if it is a "press release", WP:PRSOURCE says "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability and...
Click to read more »from the original press release, with some bits chopped out. The essay WP:PRSOURCE makes points I agree with. As for whether Octane has a reputation for fact-checking...
Click to read more »was in the tweets, they are not independent secondary sources. See WP:PRSOURCE. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:23, 28 September 2025 (UTC) @Usedtobecool NORG states...
Click to read more »seems like conflict of interest and rather WP:SELF primary source and WP:PRSOURCE. The tweets amount to their company's own press releases. The burden to...
Click to read more »press releases, which aren't indicative of notability according to WP:PRSOURCE, so I agree. Aamri2 (talk) 21:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »noted above, this is a near-verbatim reprint of a press release, see WP:PRSOURCE, from Cooley's company and thus not independent. Irish Times: an obituary...
Click to read more »not. However, it focuses on press releases from what I can tell, so WP:PRSOURCE applies. I believe that Hipal is correct that there is nothing here to...
Click to read more »are not WP:RS and this one is reliable (though it might fall under WP:PRSOURCE, I am not sure yet). 1 RS is still not enough, though admittedly I did...
Click to read more »agency "AA" source only quotes a Hamas press release verbatim, see WP:PRSOURCE - "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability". Marokwitz...
Click to read more »multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...
Click to read more »statement cannot be reliable or considered to be from a WP:NPOV. Per WP:PRSOURCE "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability and should...
Click to read more »fails WP:NCORP. All the coverage available consists of press releases (WP:PRSOURCE), niche WP:TRADES publications not contributing to notability, and WP:ORGTRIV...
Click to read more »coverage such as press releases [...] is not significant coverage", WP:PRSOURCE "A press release is clearly not an independent source"), so bringing it...
Click to read more »independent. At the top it says "Пресс-релизы," or press release See WP:PRSOURCE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC) Is this one a press release...
Click to read more »multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...
Click to read more »presumed significant coverage and must be independent of the subject. WP:PRSOURCE clearly states that "A press release is clearly not an independent source...
Click to read more »N A press release posted by Drysdale's company on BusinessWire. Per WP:PRSOURCE, A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually...
Click to read more »31 July 2026 (UTC) None of the sources in the article are churnalism/WP:PRSOURCE, not even the Daily Breeze piece. Additional sources exist beyond what's...
Click to read more »America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:PRSOURCE nearly all the sources on the page are non-significant, so this fails WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »sources can be used to demonstrate notability. You may want to review WP:PRSOURCE and WP:COISOURCE. —BrechtBro (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) Wikipedia:Independent...
Click to read more »Talk! 08:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC) Delete as current references are WP:PRSOURCEs either from the US or Iraq governments and "cannot be used towards claims...
Click to read more »run of the mill information, probably based on a press release. See WP:PRSOURCE. Autocar might work as one source, but it only has two sentences about...
Click to read more »Print is a press release and is not at all independent nor reliable per WP:PRSOURCE. Please share your “reliable sources” here. GrabUp - Talk 01:57, 21 July...
Click to read more »used for the first time on the succeeding edits. As keeping with the WP:PRSOURCE, the supposedly WP:RS is entitled "Here's What Fans Are Saying". Howard...
Click to read more »multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) The relevant policies on press releases are explained at WP:PRSOURCE. I deny that I am Righting Great Wrongs. I contend that I am simply applying...
Click to read more »not WP:SIGCOV. As for WP:NFILMMAKER, I saw news coverage (but more WP:PRSOURCEs of some film festival category wins, but no reviews of his work in independent...
Click to read more »subpage location. Rjjiii (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC) As noted at WP:PRSOURCE press releases from organizations are often non-independent and self-published...
Click to read more »independent, reliable sources. They are limited to WP:INTERVIEWS, WP:PRSOURCEs, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. His awards are the kind of "30 under 30" cruft...
Click to read more »the recommendations outlined at WP:NFCHAR. Most of them are either WP:PRSOURCEs or else reviews of the series in general which only mention Yomiko in...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Article created by a UPE/COI editor, consisting largely of WP:PRSOURCEs. I cannot find reliable, independent coverage of the subject and his company...
Click to read more »maybe), but maybe somewhat less so and at least it's independent and not PRSOURCE. Given the coverage and article both focus on it as a business entity and...
Click to read more »as the publication of a university. The remaining sources are all WP:PRSOURCES about the Unbeatable DLC and the Hatsune Miku Digital Stars live events...
Click to read more »does apply here with regards to a government press release (see also WP:PRSOURCE). ABOUTSELF applies to each source individually, so a PR statement by the...
Click to read more »for Wikipedia articles (see Wikipedia:Independent sources, especially WP:PRSOURCE) and do not contribute to notability (see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations...
Click to read more »WP:SOCKPUPPETRY and has persistently dismissed secondary sources as WP:PRSOURCE without evidence. The matter moved to a full-on discussion that reached...
Click to read more »