Redirect to:
discussion on the article's talk page using a template. Shortcut WP:PROSPLITWP:PROSPLIT For disambiguation pages, use {{Split dab}} instead of {{split}}. If the...
Click to read more »then you should commence the WP:PROSPLIT process; the instructions for how to do this are very clear on the PROSPLIT page. If you do not do so, then the...
Click to read more »redirect will get them to the page they should placing the content on. A WP:PROSPLIT would fail here if attempted, so redirect and be done with it. ~2026-14944-70...
Click to read more »even call for that. The only thing I'd suggest is gaining consensus to WP:PROSPLIT the List of wars involving Yemen Garuda Talk! 19:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »@Jeramypappas: - I suggest following exactly the procedure listed at WP:PROSPLIT.CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Hi @CommanderWaterford:...
Click to read more »performers. It might have been preferable that the split be discussed as per WP:PROSPLIT, at which the issues of article size and notability may have been raised...
Click to read more »however content has been copied without attribution as required by WP:PROSPLIT/WP:COPYWITHIN and has remained that way for weeks since my early comment...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »crafted this list, basically a WP:POVSPLIT. Even so, they should have WP:PROSPLIT based on general consensus, but no proper procedure was followed. Moreover...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »22 February 2023 (UTC) SandyGeorgia I split the content using the WP:PROSPLIT note, there is no instruction there as to noting attribution, just to state...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »from the main article (that didn't follow the information listed at WP:PROSPLIT). Isaidnoway (talk) 23:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Keep. Listcruft my foot...
Click to read more »to split content out of European Open (snooker). I pointed out that WP:PROSPLIT permits editors to revert bold splits that do not have a consensus but...
Click to read more »organized.) @Sims2aholic8: Maybe a discussion for this could be opened per WP:PROSPLIT? That way, we could see if other users think a split is needed and, if...
Click to read more »Suárez or any other article prior to the creation of this article, and WP:PROSPLIT would have required that any duplicated information be removed from the...
Click to read more »organized.) @Sims2aholic8: Maybe a discussion for this could be opened per WP:PROSPLIT? That way, we could see if other users think a split is needed and, if...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »in the first place because of not abiding to WP:PROSPLIT (diff23 diff24). This is not true: PROSPLIT allows for any split to be done boldly if criteria...
Click to read more »this thread), essentially suggesting that WP:PROSPLIT doesn't allow WP:BOLD article splitting. PROSPLIT specifically allows BOLD splitting. I don't agree...
Click to read more »Odisha because it exceeded 50kb, see [106] and i did a bold move as per WP:PROSPLIT and gave attributions to both pages, see [107], [108]. The article 2008...
Click to read more »Was a move request the best way to do this? Possibly, possibly not. WP:PROSPLIT mentions a "split discussion" but there isn't really a set procedure or...
Click to read more »disagree that the "no consensus" amounts to a sanction of the split per WP:PROSPLIT which states a "contested bold split may be reverted, however it is not...
Click to read more »unjustified. --Kinu t/c 01:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC) Thanks. As to the wording, WP:PROSPLIT#Procedure instructs editors to use the edit summary "split from [[article...
Click to read more »then you should commence the WP:PROSPLIT process; the instructions for how to do this are very clear on the PROSPLIT page. If you do not do so, then the...
Click to read more »of if the article should be split or not. (Though, I would say that WP:PROSPLIT should be edited to give instructions as to what should be done in those...
Click to read more »the article have that exact title. You can also complete step two of WP:PROSPLIT by adding the {{split}} template to the article. Happy editing! Perfect4th...
Click to read more »WP:CAUTIOUS, they aren’t required to do so per WP:BOLD. As explained in WP:PROSPLIT, bold splits without any prior discussion are allowed; so, not discussing...
Click to read more »performers. It might have been preferable that the split be discussed as per WP:PROSPLIT, at which the issues of article size and notability may have been raised...
Click to read more »from the main article (that didn't follow the information listed at WP:PROSPLIT). Isaidnoway (talk) 23:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Keep. Listcruft my foot...
Click to read more »however content has been copied without attribution as required by WP:PROSPLIT/WP:COPYWITHIN and has remained that way for weeks since my early comment...
Click to read more »Suárez or any other article prior to the creation of this article, and WP:PROSPLIT would have required that any duplicated information be removed from the...
Click to read more »then you should probably also propose that at Talk:Outer Hebrides, see WP:PROSPLIT. I also doubt that that would be appropriate since as noted it does seem...
Click to read more »target redirect literally copy and paste to the brim without starting a WP:PROSPLIT. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC) References...
Click to read more »Snowman (talk) 12:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Update: as suggested at WP:PROSPLIT, I have started a discussion on Talk:Sea about the possibility of splitting...
Click to read more »split range, but I wonder if it would have just been better left as is; WP:PROSPLIT may apply. However even if this were considered a non-controversial split...
Click to read more »WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, or you can start a new discussion, following the process at WP:PROSPLIT. 02:49, 5 February 2023 (UTC) Done - (Initiated 1311 days ago on 6 January...
Click to read more »split should have been proposed on the target article's talk page per WP:PROSPLIT. Levivich (talk) 07:35, 14 November 2024 (UTC) Can you explain the distinction...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »2024 (UTC) Article splits are not usually done via this process; see WP:PROSPLIT for the procedure. 331dot (talk) 19:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Good point...
Click to read more »Snowman (talk) 12:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Update: as suggested at WP:PROSPLIT, I have started a discussion on Talk:Sea about the possibility of splitting...
Click to read more »bug, because a split is obviously controversial and is going to need a PROSPLIT discussion of some kind. In sum if someone does not know how to override...
Click to read more »conflict). This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be...
Click to read more »crafted this list, basically a WP:POVSPLIT. Even so, they should have WP:PROSPLIT based on general consensus, but no proper procedure was followed. Moreover...
Click to read more »target redirect literally copy and paste to the brim without starting a WP:PROSPLIT. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC) References...
Click to read more »even call for that. The only thing I'd suggest is gaining consensus to WP:PROSPLIT the List of wars involving Yemen Garuda Talk! 19:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »current state List of villages in Hokkaido is a copyright violation. WP:PROSPLIT may also be helpful. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:06...
Click to read more »split should have been proposed on the target article's talk page per WP:PROSPLIT. Levivich (talk) 07:35, 14 November 2024 (UTC) Can you explain the distinction...
Click to read more »(podcast).—Alalch E. 22:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC) (I still recommend a WP:PROSPLIT discussion, after the podcast content in the source article has been expanded...
Click to read more »(podcast).—Alalch E. 22:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC) (I still recommend a WP:PROSPLIT discussion, after the podcast content in the source article has been expanded...
Click to read more »