This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate that point. As a rule, editors engaging in "POINTy" behavior are making edits with which they do not actually agree, for the...
Click to read more »Pointy pointy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »August 2018 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_August_3#Pointy ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:07, 3 August 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »Pointy pointy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »assume that what the people on the business side do is easy. The term "pointy-haired fallacy" might not be a bad name for it, although the PHB in Dilbert...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Pointy ears (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »animal) pointy ears. Sandstein 14:54, 10 August 2026 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Pointy ears Articles for deletion/Pointy ears (2nd...
Click to read more »DexterPointy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more » The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC) The Pointy Shoe Factory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was delete. Tone 11:11, 16 January 2010 (UTC) Pointy-headed Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »DexterPointy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »Redirect to Patrick Star. He has a head! It ends in a point! Pointy pointy pointy! Pointy pointy point! This AFD is over, except for this line: you win this...
Click to read more »which it usually is in that show, to a pointy wedge shape. Is that the thing, anger? Does his head turn pointy when he gets mad? Or what is with the head...
Click to read more »Sasquatch is a small man with a pointy head? I don't know whether Sasquatches can sue us for defamation, but small men with pointy heads presumably can. Tlhslobus...
Click to read more »Capitalist System Template:Did you know nominations/Pyramid of Capitalist System Pointy ears Template:Did you know nominations/Pointy ears Talk:Hanpu/GA1...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Has a head that ends in a WP:POINT. WP:POINTy WP:POINTy WP:POINTy WP:POINTy WP:POINTy WP:POINT.[April Fools!] -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:41,...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was keep. WP:SNOW closure of WP:POINTy nomination. The Bushranger One ping only 04:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC) Udaan...
Click to read more »Delete - Cute, but ultimately POINTy.--🌈WaltCip-(talk) 15:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC) Delete agree, definition of POINTy Dronebogus (talk) 19:51, 6 December...
Click to read more »distinguishes for Pointe shoe and Pointed shoe, neither of which are called pointies or pointys AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC) Delete. there...
Click to read more »relevant notability guidelines, easily substantiate Jogurney's claim of a pointy nomination. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Barel Mouko (edit |...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close as pointy nom. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One...
Click to read more »Speedy Keep. This reminds me of a poem by John Lillison: O pointy birds, o pointy pointy, Anoint my head, anointy-nointy. Grayfell (talk) 05:08, 5 October...
Click to read more »will have pointy bits, and a geometric sphere does not. SemanticMantis (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2015 (UTC) One can get rid of the pointy bits through...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Wrong venue, does appear POINTy Seek MfD and write a substantial rationale if desired. Jclemens (talk) 04:33...
Click to read more »(UTC) useless and WP:POINTy. Wikipedia is not myspace, nor is Wikipedia a webhost, but most importantly Wikipedia is not for pointy snubs at other users...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related...
Click to read more »Things" "The Wolf and the Lion" "A Golden Crown" "You Win or You Die" "The Pointy End" "Baelor" "Fire and Blood" Game of Thrones: Season 1 (soundtrack)...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable album (fails WP:GNG), created as a piece of WP:POINTy disruption to increase the link-count on the band's navbox (which is at...
Click to read more »nominate all of these separately? You really need to be banned for this pointy behavior. Spanneraol (talk) 06:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC) I'm not trying...
Click to read more »30 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy userfy this was a pointy article which, due to its incompleteness is very pointy and far from having any value to wikipedia....
Click to read more »Folklore|Monitoring}} to embed on a user page Articles for deletion 18 Jul 2026 – Pointy ears (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Zxcvbnm (t · c) was closed as keep by...
Click to read more »this AfD. Alex (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »03:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC) Speedy Keep - was this a pointy nomination resulting from NuclearWarfare's pointy PROD or is there a consensus to blanket PROD all...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 06:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) Procedural Kepp per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:58, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him...
Click to read more »this AfD. Alex (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 06:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »of 'pointy' which on Wikipedia is generally understood to refer to the WP:POINT policy. A recent example was '[Creating this essay] is a pointy salvo...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC) PointyRemote (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »(UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him...
Click to read more »(UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 06:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him...
Click to read more »above. Alex (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him...
Click to read more »above. Alex (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy kept - obvious POINTy, bad-faith, and snowballable nomination. Will (talk) 15:33, 10 July 2007...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »this AfD. Alex (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »one way that editors are encouraged to exercise common sense and avoid pointy, bureaucratic behavior. The snowball clause states: If an issue has a snowball's...
Click to read more »country. Spanneraol (talk) 02:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC) Keep as a clearly WP:POINTy nomination for bandy articles in the US being nominated. Popularity has...
Click to read more »article: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kmweber/Some AfDs to fight WP:POINTy subpage by a user who has left. All of these afds have long since closed...
Click to read more »-- DexterPointy (talk) 10:27, 22 July 2018 (UTC) Neutral - Changed my vote: It looks like the AfD had a very positive effect. -- DexterPointy (talk) 16:32...
Click to read more »being POINTY, but it might save us all a headache. Gonzonoir (talk) 12:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Go for it, and I don't think you're being POINTY at all...
Click to read more »Alex (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Keep - Procedural keep per WP:POINTy. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »because the WP:SPAM article for your own company has been nominated is WP:Pointy and disruptive, especially when those articles are for your competitors...
Click to read more »result was speedy keep. Fix the problems and/or discuss a rename, but the POINTy nomination is invalid -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:24, 8 September 2017...
Click to read more »Speedy Keep Obvious WP:POINTy nomination. This article should be kept like the other 30 articles that were kept due to Portillo's pointy nominations. Gamezero05...
Click to read more »Speedy Keep Obvious WP:POINTy nomination. This article should be kept like the other 30 articles that were kept due to Portillo's pointy nominations. Gamezero05...
Click to read more »Championships. Spanneraol (talk) 01:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC) Keep as this is just a pointy nomination because some of his bandy articles have been put up for deletion...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep (WP:SNOW, WP:POINTy nomination). (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 07:02, 30 December...
Click to read more »material, but instead is WP:POINTy. It is clear that none of these articles will be deleted, so the best course is non-pointy work to improve them. VMS...
Click to read more »GAR RfC PR RM MRG SPL AFC (Archive) Articles for deletion 18 Jul 2026 – Pointy ears (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Zxcvbnm (t · c) was closed as keep by...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep (WP:SNOW, WP:POINTy nomination). (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 07:06, 30 December...
Click to read more »make further pointy nominations without allowing a couple months to pass first. Obsessing over this article is disruptive, and furhter pointy nominations...
Click to read more »my owner:Online 20:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Comment: This is a kind of WP:POINTy AfD against Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bengali songs recorded...
Click to read more »Speedy Keep Obvious WP:POINTy nomination. This article should be kept like the other 30 articles that were kept due to Portillo's pointy nominations. Gamezero05...
Click to read more »with a second WP:POINTy stub deleted as well. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:04, 7 August 2011 (UTC) Note As the admin who deleted the pointy iteration of the...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This should be deleted as it is WP:POINTY [4-1]-KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Too WP:POINTY. Seems disruptive to the project of building an encyclopedia. -KAP03 (Talk •...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. WP:POINTY nomination by WP:SPA. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 11:59,...
Click to read more »November 2016 (UTC) Pointy nomination I had a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Townsend and this looks like a pointy nomination to me. --Lemongirl942...
Click to read more »be pretty great. Actually, I'm thinking this may also be related to Pointy pointy. I'm wondering if we could find a way to consolidate all this under...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep. Clearly WP:POINTy nomination without any basis in policy, especially considering that this...
Click to read more »the top of the picture) and the arch (all the rest of it, with the little pointy bits all over it). The two main connecting parts of the arch are the pedicle...
Click to read more »assigned the job to clean up the park with a trash can and a pointy stick. How do I find a pointy stick like that Arthur TV show? Does it even exist in real...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Delete - removal of the PROD was borderline POINTy; article clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:09, 1 March...
Click to read more » The result was speedy keep, nominator has voted to keep. Clearly a WP:POINTy nomination. --Kinu t/c 01:33, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Saman Hasnain (edit |...
Click to read more »fake (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) The page is nothing but a WP:POINTy WP:BATTLEGROUND WP:ATTACK on the folks who drafted WP:ZIMFF. It adds nothing...
Click to read more »challenge.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 06:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Keep WP:POINTY nomination. The previous discussion looks like an easy keep. Using the rational...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Appears to be pointy nomination - AFD is not for "blowing up and restarting" the panda ₯’ 19:36...
Click to read more »redirects without a valid reason, and I suggest that he is the one being pointy. In any event, this article cannot be kept without reliable sourcing; I...
Click to read more »From what I can see of the nominator's edit history, this strikes me as a POINTy nomination. Should be struck down. – PeeJay 15:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Speedy Keep Obvious WP:POINTy nomination. This article should be kept like the other 30 articles that were kept due to Portillo's pointy nominations. Gamezero05...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:SNOW keep; obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Ironholds (talk) 07:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Empires & Allies...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:SNOW keep; obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Ironholds (talk) 07:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Texas HoldEm...
Click to read more »then. Since this AfD (which as mentioned below has the distinct odour of pointiness) would only end up in another Keep, whuilst only generating drahmaz, I...
Click to read more »concerned. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 04:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC) A bit pointy and disruptive nomination.TMCk (talk) 04:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Trout...
Click to read more »[4], and so on. Pichpich (talk) 20:55, 18 October 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep Pointy and disruptive nomination, as explained by Pichpich. What happens on other...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete as it is WP:POINTy. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Merge to...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:SNOW keep; obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Ironholds (talk) 07:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC) CityVille (edit |...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy Pointy nomination, user has been reported for being disruptive. Speedy close.....
Click to read more »Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC) So...it's WP:POINTy because I didn't read something I am incapable of reading? I'm not, nor...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:SNOW keep; obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Ironholds (talk) 07:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Treasure Isle...
Click to read more »(Game of Thrones) The North Remembers Oathbreaker (Game of Thrones) The Pointy End The Red Woman Jon Snow (character) A Song of Ice and Fire Daenerys Targaryen...
Click to read more »this early as concensus is clear, and all these mass nominations are a bit pointy. (former admin close) Secret account 03:28, 18 August 2011 (UTC) Rashawn...
Click to read more »for enduring coverage to have arisen has elapsed. And it's certainly not pointy to nominate other articles based on a current AFD when they fail established...
Click to read more »evidence of notability of this specific fund. The article was a somewhat pointy creation in an effort to bolster the argument of those opposed to moving...
Click to read more »per nom, potential for flaming if it ever gets expanded, and clearly WP:POINTy given the single entry on it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now...
Click to read more »(UTC)). This is indeed quite strange behaviour and this whole AFD seems POINTY to me but I think this is good opportunity to set some threshold for these...
Click to read more »another deletion discussion on the heels of the first; this, to me, is POINTy. Miniapolis 12:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Speedy Keep - The discussion was...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC) Comment - as far as I can tell, this is a WP:POINTy nomination. CV (the article creator) put a speedy tag on an article that...
Click to read more »the reason nominated. The article is not "pointless", rather it is too "pointy." The topic is Mr. Trump and the info is already a section in his article...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:SNOW keep; obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Ironholds (talk) 07:41, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Friends for Sale...
Click to read more »LoreGatherer2 (t · c); see discussion Articles for deletion 18 Jul 2026 – Pointy ears (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Zxcvbnm (t · c) was closed as keep by...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »these ideas. Primefac (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC) Keep - This is a pointy nomination in response to the deletion of the recreated article Sachin Lokapure...
Click to read more »redirects without a valid reason, and I suggest that he is the one being pointy. In any event, this article cannot be kept without reliable sourcing; I...
Click to read more »redirects without a valid reason, and I suggest that he is the one being pointy. In any event, this article cannot be kept without reliable sourcing; I...
Click to read more »article and the nom makes this look pretty pointy. Hobit (talk) 02:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC) What is pointy is stashing this archived article in the sandbox...
Click to read more »I've gotten to GA for deletion. This is good. And clearly evidence of WP:POINTy behavior, in my opinion. Disavian (talk) 23:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »page. The result was keep. If the account is not compromised, this is a pointy demonstration.(non-admin closure) TrangaBellam (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2022...
Click to read more »confirmed sock puppet of DogsHeadFalls. This nomination is just a failed, pointy attempt at block-evasion. Stalwart111 07:52, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Carl Berner...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »redirects without a valid reason, and I suggest that he is the one being pointy. In any event, this article cannot be kept without reliable sourcing; I...
Click to read more »seems really pointy and disruptive. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC) Oh, so opposing an image with a given reason is pointy and disruptive...
Click to read more »Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC) Keep Another WP:POINTy AfD after the PROD was shot down. Article is not without references, as...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. WP:POINTy nomination. Geschichte (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep as POINTy nomination by sockpuppet. NAC Beerest355 Talk 13:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »would make this sort of Pointy nomination right went hey are under some scrutiny. But then I suppose that is the idea of Pointy action. -DJSasso (talk)...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:SNOW keep; obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Ironholds (talk) 07:41, 5 September 2011 (UTC) The Pioneer Trail...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy close as keep. Querrelous and pointy nomination. Phil Sandifer (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC) Body thetan...
Click to read more »notable genre. The list has a clear inclusion criteria. I feel this is a POINTY nomination by Curb Chain, after a similar list was kept. Lugnuts (talk)...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »User:Gamaliel/Small hands (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Pointy user space creation following deletion [1] that has no chance of being included...
Click to read more »taggers and admins? Is the PROD process open to inappropriate interference by POINTy inclusionists? Do we need new speedy criteria to cover items and issues...
Click to read more »DexterPointy (talk) 08:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC) @Shadowowl: AfD works better than PROD -- DexterPointy (talk) 08:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC) @DexterPointy: I used...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. obvious pointy nomination. I & others have warned the nom. DGG ( talk ) 01:31, 2 June 2012...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep - obviously pointy nomination from an editor since blocked for an obvious username violation...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep WP:POINTy nomination; actually so stated in edit summary by the now indefinitely blocked...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep Blatantly WP:POINTy nomination. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. POINTy nomination by article creator, with thinly veiled insults and accusations...
Click to read more »15 November 2015 (UTC) Keep - WP:POINTY nomination per this. LjL (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2015 (UTC) Not WP:POINTy, the notability is questioned by an...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:SNOW keep; obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Ironholds (talk) 07:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Drugwars (edit |...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep, but the pointy name change should probably be undone. Jayjg (talk) 02:55, 13 January 2010...
Click to read more »nomination. See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Possibly_pointy_AFDs. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 15:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC) Article i worked...
Click to read more »a RfC about creating a redirect policy? -- DexterPointy (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC) DexterPointy, neither. Redirecting rather than outright deletion...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep POINTy nomination indeed. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters •...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »9 February 2008 (UTC) It's been declined already, but... how was this POINTy? There were legitimate questions raised as to you and Jhurlburt prior to...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy close, speedy keep This nomination appears to be rather WP:Pointy. New York Times mentioned this product, meeting all notability requirements...
Click to read more »answer to be comprehensible to a non-mathematician. And I don't trust the pointy-heads over there to be able to do that. Thanks very much, --Viennese Waltz...
Click to read more »Mosaic (talk) 14:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »nothing to do with dictionary definitions, but appears to be part of a pointy set of inappropriate AfD nominations. Acroterion (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2013...
Click to read more »vote but what you may not do is be POINTy about it. The question you asked @scope_creep was a subtle attempt to be POINTy which constitutes disruptive editing...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 75.172.12.104 (talk · contribs) warned after Pointy, soapboxing, and disruptive edits at Talk: 2012 in UFC events including...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep as pointy nomination. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close obvious POINTy nom. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells...
Click to read more »you disagreed with that decision, WP:DRV is the venue. Re-nominating is pointy and disruptive. Smashvilletalk 19:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »per WP:BLP, WP:ONEEVENT, WP:COAT, and WP:SNOW. At this point, it's just a pointy and cruel reminder to a human being who is, and a condition that is, already...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:SNOW keep; obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Ironholds (talk) 07:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Words With Friends...
Click to read more »idiom dictionary" is a reason for deletion??), but appears to be part of a pointy set of inappropriate AfD nominations. Acroterion (talk) 15:25, 31 May 2013...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge and redirect to Criticism of Wikipedia. I believe there were WP:POINTy motives in starting the article, but regardless, it's a topic better served...
Click to read more »15:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC) Delete reads like an essay written by Dilbert's pointy-haired boss. Probably impossible to turn into an article without a 100%...
Click to read more »multiple reliable sourcing. Very POINTy nomination. Dekkappai (talk) 04:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC) This was not meant to be "pointy", but I do invite people to...
Click to read more »discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Keep - This is a WP:POINTY nomination by Rupert1904 in response to the AfD nomination of Bremer SV...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Keep, per WP:SNOW, POINTy nomination. Non-admin close. Redfarmer (talk) 17:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC) AfDs...
Click to read more »salvation (barring complete deletion and rewriting from scratch). DexterPointy (talk) 13:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:50, 26 July 2011 (UTC) Note Nominator appears to be exhibiting WP:POINTY behavior related to his own page getting deleted. snaphat (talk) 12:32,...
Click to read more »be helpful. --TS 21:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC) Interesting. I am not being pointy I just want to know. Is this an appropriate use of this board? I thought...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was keep. Not a snowball's chance of this pointy nom ending in anything but 'keep' The Bushranger One ping only 02:52, 26...
Click to read more »be used for articles simply needing cleanup. Further, this is likely a pointy deletion in response to this. I gave the nominator some advice about deletion...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Bad faith, pointy nomination; speedy closed. The Bushranger One ping only 22:11, 26 April...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:SNOW keep; obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Ironholds (talk) 07:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC) YoVille (edit |...
Click to read more »Comment looks vaguely pointy, why not wait for the DRV result? Yomanganitalk 14:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC) I know it looks pointy, but it's not actually...
Click to read more »due to error by people looking for the painting, not this play. -- DexterPointy (talk) 10:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Comment for closing admin : The user, who...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC) I agree that the nomination looks a bit pointy, since the nomination is basically copied from one of those AFDs. However...
Click to read more »Geschichte (t · c) on 13 Aug 2026; see discussion (8 participants) 18 Jul 2026 – Pointy ears (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Zxcvbnm (t · c) was closed as keep by...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep as disruptive pointy nomination. Users first contribution to boot. Synergy 08:37, 27 July 2008...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. This is yet another pointy nomination aimed at User:Jogurney. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:48, 18 August 2013...
Click to read more »nomination. No opinion is being expressed by me. ➔ REDVEЯS is wearing a pointy red hat 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) Note: WikiProject Writing systems...
Click to read more »Focus 15:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC) Delete per nom. The redirect may be POINTy, given a recent RfC at the page about whether to include the dog as a victim...
Click to read more »15 November 2015 (UTC) Keep - WP:POINTY nomination per this. LjL (talk) 21:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC) Not WP:POINTy, the notability is questioned by an...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was Redirected to Minor characters in 24. WP:POINTy AfD nomination notwithstanding, without reliable sources there is no evidence...
Click to read more »-- Enric Naval (talk) 19:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC) Delete all Possibly WP:POINTy wikiprojects created by a sock with almost no other outside membership....
Click to read more »ceremony, and the only reason this has been nominated at all is to try to get pointy revenge at me for nominating an unrelated topic. Bearcat (talk) 22:35, 30...
Click to read more »policy as an example that is an exception to WP:1E. I think this is a WP:Pointy AFD because the article was used in a discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »Frankly, it's a violation of userspace rules, is insulting to many others, is POINTy at this stage and is not conducive to building an encyclopedia. Nor is Wikipedia...
Click to read more »(Game of Thrones) The North Remembers Oathbreaker (Game of Thrones) The Pointy End The Red Woman Jon Snow (character) A Song of Ice and Fire Daenerys Targaryen...
Click to read more »appears to be part of a pointy set of inappropriate AfD nominations. Acroterion (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC) This is not a "pointy set of inappropriate...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »Bad faith nomination, as noted above by Only; disruptive in nature, and pointy, apparently one of several, and from an editor who never seems to learn...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep possibly pointy. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat...
Click to read more »26 January 2013 (UTC) Speedy keep and close - this AfD seems rather WP:POINTy. See the discussion here. Also: I'm not sure how WP:UNDUE applies, and as...
Click to read more »get the point across (and provide the search for them, so as not to be WP:POINTy in making the point). WP:Don't be a dork WP:Don't bludgeon the process § No...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep, possibly pointy nomination. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken...
Click to read more »article in particular has been nominated and my disappointment with the POINTY nature of the comment by the nominator in response to comments above. Blue...
Click to read more »search term, there are no links to it, and, while harmless, it's a bit on WP:POINTy side. pie4all88 (talk) 06:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom DA PIE EATER...
Click to read more »warning: Kids, don't do this at home) The original AFD was speedily closed as pointy, but since there is a standard of what applies, we should apply these standards...
Click to read more »while WP:BURO is solid policy. You want to change policy, don't do it by pointy AfDs. Scott Mac 17:23, 18 November 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »widely-used term, and the article is written in the style of Dilbert's pointy-haired boss. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »purposes AnonNeedsAnAccount (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Speedy keep pointy nom made by obvious SPA. Article asserts notability and has decent secondary...
Click to read more »external link to a state encyclopedia article about white flight...this is WP:POINTY and the creator was blocked, so I can't assume good faith about why this...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result of the discussion was speedy close as WP:POINTy nomination. Please let the WP:DRV discussion complete first. ···日本穣? · 投稿...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Obvious SNOW. POINTy nomination by spa. DGG (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC) Russian Mafia (edit |...
Click to read more »football player. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC) Comment A pointy AFD for a different article was improperly tacked onto this discussion....
Click to read more »to this page. The result was Speedy keep close, no reason for deletion, pointy username, on major article. Fram (talk) 07:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC) Article...
Click to read more »delete, and the nomination seems wp:pointy Theserialcomma (talk) 07:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC) After this edit VERY pointy --Natet/c 08:36, 16 September 2009...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »WP:POINTy nom; knock it off. Nate • (chatter) 04:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Not willing to see advertising but accusing others of bad faith and pointy nomination...
Click to read more »while WP:BURO is solid policy. You want to change policy, don't do it by pointy AfDs. Scott Mac 17:23, 18 November 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was No consensus. Given the pointy nom, no prejudice to quick relisting. Randykitty (talk) 14:20, 9 October...
Click to read more »extend than Wiktionary is its proper place. --DexterPointy (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC) @DexterPointy you make a good point that this article is excessively...
Click to read more »indication of notability, no coverage in reliabe sources. prod removed by pointy editor Duffbeerforme (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »be a good faith nomination: see also this MfD nomination. User is being pointy. ColdmachineTalk 21:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Does this actually have a point...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »This seems to be a disruptive and WP:POINTY nomination by an editor who was recently blocked for being POINTY. Collectonian (talk) 19:49, 13 February...
Click to read more »dismiss this AfD on suspicion of pointiness, we might as well dismiss the article for embarrassingly obvious pointiness; indeed, COI has already been claimed...
Click to read more »technically I could close this as Speedy Keep per WP:SK1 but that'd be pointy and now rather quite pointless!... Anyway clear keep (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »— LinguistAtLarge • Talk 16:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Keep Seems like part of a pointy series of nominations. Satisfies WP:N. Edison (talk) 16:53, 31 July 2009...
Click to read more »Ref.3: https://www.quora.com/What-is-Boston-Confucianism -- DexterPointy (talk) 07:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »thought I'd say this: I believe genocide is in order gentlemen, get the pointy sticks out. Rje 00:44, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) Delete. Elf-friend 09:11, 28 Dec...
Click to read more »respected editors. (Despite the delete !vote this was as pointed below a pointy nomination so I'm closing as Speedy Keep) (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »official(?) message board (not independent or reliable). Prod removed for pointy reason. Duffbeerforme (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Comment, nomination might be a bit POINTY, but could well be correct. Let's debate strictly on the merits... Abductive...
Click to read more »Flylanguage (talk • contribs) Note Nominator appears to be exhibiting WP:POINTY behavior related to his own page getting deleted. snaphat (talk) 12:29,...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Draft which was moved to mainspace in quite a WP:POINTY manner. No prose whatsoever beyond a textual restatement of statistics included...
Click to read more »willing to just start accusing editors. Original complaint: After a rather pointy discussion a brand new user with zero other contributions popped up to lash...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC) Comment This seems to be one of two WP:POINTY AfDs this user has started, because his/her own article is up for discussion...
Click to read more »gray-blue and he has pointy nose and ears, one other looks like a dwarf and others are smaller, strong, green, with big noses and pointy-hairy ears. Troll...
Click to read more »to? //roux 21:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC) In addition, this seems a skosh pointy in light of this. Your first edit off your break was to do this, Daedalus...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#2, this was a WP:POINTy nomination performed in response to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles-Butler...
Click to read more »are at least nine candidates I will support.(1) Sorry if this seems WP:POINTy but I couldn't bear the thought that shitty people could be elected and...
Click to read more »progress directly from manager to micromanager, the next evolution of the pointy-haired boss would logically be the picomanager. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 13:23...
Click to read more »oppose !vote, but rather to the ones that dismissively accuse me of being POINTy rather that bothering to consider what I had to say. I question why it was...
Click to read more »socialist, a user who is now indeffed created this essay. While deliberately WP:POINTy, this essay effectively duplicates the topic we already cover at communist...
Click to read more »05:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC) I believe this page was created just to be wp:pointy. Disposing of it would be very uncontroversial, IMO. Tony (talk) 02:47,...
Click to read more »of release. -- DexterPointy (talk) 15:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC) Note: Relevant WP-Context is article 3D television. -- DexterPointy (talk) 19:09, 28 July...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. pointy nom; snow (non-admin closure) Atmoz (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Look...
Click to read more »Maybe her husband? (It's hard to tell from just a nose, but his was kind of pointy like that, I guess...) Adam Bishop (talk) 02:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC) The image...
Click to read more »do provide a unique function. I suspect the nomination to be a little WP:POINTY anyway. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:08, 12 May 2015 (UTC) I'd say that it would...
Click to read more »ceremony, and the only reason this has been nominated at all is to try to get pointy revenge at me for nominating an unrelated topic. Bearcat (talk) 22:36, 30...
Click to read more »| watch | logs) Improper use of draftspace, irredeemably non-neutral/WP:POINTY. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Delete ...... Name speaks for...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy close, possibly WP:POINTy nomination made by a now indef-blocked sockpuppet. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »uploading of NFC of recently deceased by Slowking4 - possibly a POINTy violation Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive796#User:Slowking4...
Click to read more »actually as much of a Google promotion as it is a real competition. -- DexterPointy (talk) 13:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Comment. Unsure about this one. Yes, the...
Click to read more »could be seen as POINTY (for borderline or notable topics) Long-term we need to decide what's best as BOGOF could be seen as POINTY Is BOGOF editing an...
Click to read more »threatened to open this AfD if the other AfD didn't go your way. Please read WP:POINTy ("When one becomes frustrated with the way a ... guideline is being applied...
Click to read more »article makes no assertions of the subject's notability. Alex is being pointy. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep pointy nomination. Users first contributions and this. Synergy 21:12, 23 August...
Click to read more »foul" for choosing the wrong criterion). However, it was created to be POINTY on an AfD discussion. As it was never intended to be and never will be used...
Click to read more »necessary, engage in the dispute resolution process. This seems to be a very pointy nomination. Not to mention, previous AfD was closed less than a day ago...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability of any sort. Nothing more than a pointy hagiography. PRehse (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »dripping with sarcasm, and not funny at all. A pointless (or rather, WP:POINTy) page. Simply not helpful to the project, and should not be in project space...
Click to read more »while WP:BURO is solid policy. You want to change policy, don't do it by pointy AfDs. Scott Mac 17:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »article and references. Nomination for AFD due to locked dispute seems quite POINTY. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Dispute? There isn't...
Click to read more »—cyberbot I NotifyOffline 09:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC) Speedy close - POINTY disruptive nomination by SPA with an axe to grind against Groklaw and subjects...
Click to read more »billion and one years ago, and so this whole process is inappropriate and POINTy. As pointed out below, there is no precedent nor justification for this...
Click to read more »sources provided to even look at. The above two keep votes are disruptive and POINTy. Miami33139 (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »redirects without a valid reason, and I suggest that he is the one being pointy. In any event, this article cannot be kept without reliable sourcing; I...
Click to read more »LetsdrinkTea 19:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC) This was a declined A7. It seemed pointy to go immediately for another speedy, so here it is. --Patar knight - chat/contributions...
Click to read more »July 2011 (UTC) Note Nominator FlyLanguage appears to be exhibiting WP:POINTY behavior related to his own page getting deleted. snaphat (talk) 12:30,...
Click to read more »every part of it is crystal clear and terrifying, especially the sharp pointy claws and fat white body. ...But, that said, this is one of the best insect...
Click to read more »that was created to address concerns in a concurrent AFD really is a bit pointy. It seems fairly obvious that while the concept might be notable (having...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Keep. Boldly keeping the presumed bad-faith or POINTy nomination. Non-admin closure. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:34,...
Click to read more »15 November 2015 (UTC) Keep - WP:POINTY nomination per this. LjL (talk) 21:51, 15 November 2015 (UTC) Not WP:POINTy, the notability is questioned by an...
Click to read more »ceremony, and the only reason this has been nominated at all is to try to get pointy revenge at me for nominating an unrelated topic. Bearcat (talk) 22:35, 30...
Click to read more »ImmortalWizard(chat) 13:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC) Keep this is somewhat WP:POINTy: an AfD is not the best means to get an article updated. Sails through WP:NCRIC...
Click to read more »provided; this is the same reasoning as the last two and appears to be WP:POINTy -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 01:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC) Lauren Conrad (3rd...
Click to read more »--IP98 (talk) 13:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC) Delete as pointless as well as pointy. LadyofShalott 13:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC) Delete sad waste of the community's...
Click to read more »Mosaic (talk) 13:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »demo with no indication of notability and no sources. Prod removed for pointy reason. Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC) Delete From WP:NALBUMS:...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. WP:SK#2 - Disruptive pointy bad faith nomination. (non-admin closure) The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk)...
Click to read more »gets to be a submarine, a missile, a bomber, a zeppelin, a ... anything pointy. This is one. Geogre 11:36, 30 November 2005 (UTC) Delete per nominator;...
Click to read more »The result was speedy keep. This is NOT a humorous nomination but a WP:POINTy edit. Issuing warning. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:45...
Click to read more »result was Keep per WP:SNOW. Article is sourced, nom seems a little WP:POINTy. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells...
Click to read more »result was Speedy keep. Nominator is likely a sock, and this is possibly a pointy nomination given how recently the last afd closed. Non-admin closure. Ten...
Click to read more »sources already cited in the article, nomination and deletion rationale look pointy. Cavarrone 07:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Speedy Keep Obvious WP:POINTy nomination. This article should be kept like the other 30 articles that were kept due to Portillo's pointy nominations. Gamezero05...
Click to read more »have been tagged for Cleanup or Merging, not Deletion. Nominator is being pointy, having nominated dozens of articles in a short time with much the same...
Click to read more »vendetta for off-wiki banishment from a web site. This is just another pointy nomination. CycloneGU (talk) 14:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC) National Council...
Click to read more »while WP:BURO is solid policy. You want to change policy, don't do it by pointy AfDs. Scott Mac 17:21, 18 November 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »notable. InFlamester20 (talk) 05:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep. Bad faith pointy nom. Stems from some MMA articles nominator's been involved in being merged...
Click to read more »ceremony, and the only reason this has been nominated at all is to try to get pointy revenge at me for nominating an unrelated topic. Bearcat (talk) 22:36, 30...
Click to read more »The result of the debate was speedy keep This is a blatantly disruptive, pointy nomination that contains a personal attack in the nomination. John Reaves...
Click to read more »doesn’t give you leeway to create an equally bad article xyz. That’s WP:POINTy and such rationales or arguments constitutes WP:ATA in an AFD. Celestina007...
Click to read more »violates copyright. Nate • (chatter) 04:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Keep to deter pointy nominations. Bearian (talk) 01:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »is a carnivore and has four limbs with retractable claws, whiskers, and pointy movable ears." AnonMoos (talk) 23:40, 2 September 2018 (UTC) "Is when" is...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Unsourced stub, fails WP:GNG. (Just kidding, this is a pretty pointy nomination. No need for WP:REVENGE.) Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits...
Click to read more »May 13 What's the significance when the Martian Manhunter's head gets pointy? Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2014 May 14 What percentage...
Click to read more »important, some not. Giving this as a deletion reason does seem rather POINTy. However, the copyvio was a serious concern. Fortunately for these articles...
Click to read more »already made your vote. Could this have anything to do with this obviously pointy nom? – How do you turn this on (talk) 00:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC) Actually...
Click to read more »it everyday doesn't mean it's abandoned, If anything this looks like a POINTY MFD but either way there's no consensus to Delete. –Davey2010Talk 01:01...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep Seems to be a WP:POINTy nomination. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters...
Click to read more »wikipedia. Glock17gen4 (talk) 02:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep. Bad faith pointy nom. Stems from some MMA articles nominator's been involved in being merged...
Click to read more »like it was written in confused marketing babble, like something Dilbert's pointy-heaired boss would come up with. Host your own brochure, guys, and for goodness...
Click to read more »appears to be a poor faith, WP:POINTy creation. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:10, 25 June 2011 (UTC) Not pointy, just misguided. Safe to say that...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Comment: This seems to be one of a few WP:POINTY changes following the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bianca...
Click to read more »February 2021 (UTC) speedy delete per g5 and Martin's request. This is a WP:POINTY disruptive mfd and could've been taken care of uncontroversially with a...
Click to read more »of notability. --Hyperbole 21:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Delete cruft with pointy ears. Sandstein 21:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. --Rory096 23:24...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Delete: Another of Smartyllama's frankly pointy and disruptive deprods. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject meets the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per WP:POINTY in most types of default cursors in most operating systems. Also, it's more...
Click to read more »considering the past history of the nominating user, this is a borderline pointy AfD nomination, IMHO. Ejgreen77 (talk) 13:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC) I guess...
Click to read more »Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW. Nomination is highly inappropriate and reeks of WP:POINTy issues going on, as does editor's other nomination above. Non-admin close...
Click to read more »of a history of both questionable hockey-related article creations and pointy actions; there's no little irony in that the same day he created this article...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Keep as above. This is a bad-faith and POINTy nomination based on this - also deeply flawed as detailed by everyone above...
Click to read more »Geschichte (t · c) on 13 Aug 2026; see discussion (8 participants) 18 Jul 2026 – Pointy ears (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Zxcvbnm (t · c) was closed as keep by...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is obviously bunkum, it's WP:POINTY, about as pointy as it gets. Looking at sources, they are frequently misrepresented...
Click to read more »Speedy keep Nominator has otherwise troublesome edits, so this may be a WP:POINTy nomination. Either way, WP:SNOW seems to be applying here. NAC. Ten Pound...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Is this a notable topic? Appears to be a WP:POINTy riff on Animal attacks and its subpages (which are disastrous). Plantdrew...
Click to read more »and not speedy keep; I'm not convinced that this nomination was itself POINTy, and while I generally disagree with the practice, the community here has...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was delete. Salted due to threats of pointy recreation. If notability can ever be established, then it can be unsalted...
Click to read more »forward by the nom, notable album by a very notable band and borderline pointy nomination. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep Pointy nom by SPA. non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder)...
Click to read more »16:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Delete but your method strikes me as very pointy. The prod would have accomplished the same thing without useless process...
Click to read more »anything Alex nominates, reflexively. This is looking more than a little pointy. Ravenswing 17:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC) Snow keep per above. – Muboshgu...
Click to read more »WP:POVFORK Spumuq (talk) 14:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC) Delete Extremely pointy POV fork. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC) Strong Oppose...
Click to read more »new editor TheDracologist, whose absured redirect suggestion is either POINTY or ignorant.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC) Keep there certainly...
Click to read more »official(?) message board (not independent or reliable). Prod removed for pointy reason. Duffbeerforme (talk) 16:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »members. Weird. --Kleinzach 02:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC) Delete as bizarre WP:POINTy leftovers. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention)...
Click to read more »redirects without a valid reason, and I suggest that he is the one being pointy. In any event, this article cannot be kept without reliable sourcing; I...
Click to read more »notable. InFlamester20 (talk) 05:12, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep. Bad faith pointy nom. Stems from some MMA articles nominator's been involved in being merged...
Click to read more »take part in said discussion, instead choosing to continue to make these pointy nominations.Jeni (talk) 23:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Jeni, you have contested...
Click to read more »consideration. MrMurph101 (talk) 02:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Keep Another bad faith, pointy nomination by that editor. The article was created as a spinoff from the...
Click to read more »of My-HiME anime characters. I feel that these are starting to become WP:Pointy nominations given that just yesterday I said that I was going to merge/redirect...
Click to read more »[2]and [3] Ijanderson977 (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC) "remove WP:POINTy PROD tag - plenty of releases on large labels, evidence of significant coverage"...
Click to read more »deletion. Dawn Bard (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC) Keep This is clearly a pointy nomination. The notability of the TV show is unquestionable. SilverserenC...
Click to read more »Celarnor Talk to me 11:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy keep as per above. Too WP:POINTy. I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 11:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment - My WP:DEPROD seems to have hit a nerve. Sorry to be WP:POINTY here but WP:PROD is for uncontroversial deletions. A delete justification...
Click to read more »other discussions) and Badagnani. In addition, this mass nomination is too POINTY. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »the left ventricle protrudes caudally, producing the apex of the heart (a.k.a. the "pointy part"). --47.146.63.87 (talk) 08:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »AugustWest1980 (talk) 20:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep This is clearly a pointy, bad faith nomination to get back at the creator. Mississippistfan and AugustWest1980...
Click to read more »unless teminology differs in the US), could this be a case of Wikipedia:POINTY? Not your siblings' deletionist (talk) 01:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Could...
Click to read more »every page I encounter? No. Bad-faith removals, including vandalism and WP:POINTY disruption, are not subject to this policy. I challenged some unsourced...
Click to read more »"List of most popular physical objects". -- DexterPointy (talk) 15:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC) DexterPointy (talk) 15:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC) Keep - this article...
Click to read more »(zombie trout, maybe?) to the nominator for the, intentionally or not, WP:POINTy nomination. The Bushranger One ping only 04:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC) AfDs...
Click to read more »it isn't outright nonsense--it's written in crypic Buzzwordese spoken by pointy-haired boss types--then it's some sort of advertiseent or another. The lack...
Click to read more »17:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC) Delete Also WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and this is a WP:Pointy vote and this is not a democracy. Mazter00 (talk) 00:44, 22 November 2012...
Click to read more »single purpose account, which has not made any edits since, possibly as a pointy rejoinder to Israel and the apartheid analogy. RolandR (talk) 12:59, 9 January...
Click to read more »and helps keep the information together. Also, AfD nominator is being pointy, having nominated dozens of articles in one day while commenting they could...
Click to read more »redirects, and for good reasons. AFG is good, Comp, but you will see a lot of pointy requests here, these, one could speculate, perhaps with the intended purpose...
Click to read more »--Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC) Speedy keep This is a POINTy nomination, as described by a_man_alone. The nom is sore because his recent...
Click to read more »evidence that this nominator is following WP:BEFORE, this smells me to like WP:POINTy behavior. Bottom line, this AFD is premature and this this article should...
Click to read more »from most reasons above, but based on nom's contributions, this appears a POINTy nom (user has been critical of gamergate-related coverage). --MASEM (t)...
Click to read more »05:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Speedy keep - Methinks thy saber be a bit pointy. --jonny-mt 06:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »deleted. jjron (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC) WTF. This is a non-sense POINTy MfD. Please retract or speedy close. Unecessary drama. --Dschwen 16:07,...
Click to read more »ideals: do NFL icons have enough resolution to tell whether the balls are pointy or blunt? —Tamfang (talk) 18:55, 25 October 2019 (UTC) It can be inconsistent...
Click to read more »Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 19:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC) Very bullet pointy. Maybe covert some into sections? Dev920 22:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC) Cliff's...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy close as keep. Querrelous and pointy nomination. Phil Sandifer (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC) AfDs for...
Click to read more »not promotional. JJARichardson (talk) 18:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC) WP:POINTY? ArionStar (talk) 02:30, 9 December 2025 (UTC) Do not ignore Criterion 3...
Click to read more »other discussions) and Badagnani. In addition, this mass nomination is too POINTY. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »Chicago Tribune, and St. Louis Post-Despatch. Nominator's claims are WP:POINTY at best and deceptive at worst. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:44, 7 September...
Click to read more »WikiProject Men page demonstrates that this is nothing more than one editor's pointy creation to "prove" that if we have WikiProjects for women, we should also...
Click to read more »assertion of notability per WP:NALBUMS, and no evidence of it. This is a WP:POINTy creation, intended solely to increase the link count on Template:Doogie...
Click to read more »of these record-by-opponent lists is a bit skimpy in content and bullet-pointy in style, but that criticism applies to many popular-culture type lists...
Click to read more »of notability. The previous AFD was disrupted by editors engaging in WP:POINTY defiance of BLP policies. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:17, 7 June 2012...
Click to read more »names of perpetrators off 2017 Chicago torture incident, this may be a WP:POINTY content.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC) I was not aware...
Click to read more »fourth arguments between these 2 it's clear to anyone this is simply a POINTy nomination, Cant you both kiss and make up?. –Davey2010Talk 15:42, 30 April...
Click to read more »November 2010 (UTC) Merge per Jclemens. Suggest disregard of perhaps-a-bit-pointy idea from nom of deleting target section of merge. —chaos5023 (talk) 05:23...
Click to read more »(New thread?) 11:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC) Keep and close This is a WP:POINTY nomination, after the nom logged an issue here. It's also in the wrong namespace...
Click to read more »Speedy keep. Easily passes WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Appears to be a WP:POINTY nomination. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Speedy Keep...
Click to read more »the drop of a byte, he doesn't seem to have exerted himself much on this pointy AfD ... and this really isn't a good look for someone who's Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »26 July 2011 (UTC) Note - The nominator does appears to be exhibiting WP:POINTY behavior. snaphat (talk) 23:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC) Keep Notable enough-...
Click to read more »a point. DarkAudit (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC) He's not being WP:POINTy, at least not in my book. He just has a different interpretation of notability...
Click to read more »Hawaii case, the person travelled all the was from Boston. This is not a pointy request but an attempt for uniformity in Wikipedia. Hopefully, someone will...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Pointy POVFORK based on original research. See original deletion discussion and...
Click to read more »- They didn't have a reason, it would appear, and they were just being pointy or putting beans up their own nose. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:06, 10 April...
Click to read more »for 28.--Nakurio (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep. Bad faith pointy nom. Stems from some MMA articles nominator's been involved in being merged...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander K. Tyree. This couldn't possibly be WP:POINTY could it? Note that most editors so far have !voted keep for Tyree. I'd...
Click to read more »point is to punish paid editors. But I don't think we are suppoaed to be pointy? In this case I support deletion. I think I already said that.. If so I...
Click to read more »Francium12 17:16, 4 October 2009 (UTC) it seems to have acquired some extremely pointy keeps as well (I do not mean yours). DGG ( talk ) 18:56, 4 October 2009...
Click to read more »think that nomination was not serious, but was instead part of a series of pointy actions he took when the previous AfD ended as a keep. Calathan (talk) 21:58...
Click to read more »could be suggesting that the nomination is pointy. XF Law talk at me 20:02, 19 October 2008 (UTC) "Pointy" is close, but it implies some sort of rhyme...
Click to read more »whitewashing. -- ke4roh (talk) 17:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC) Do we do that? Sounds POINTy to me. --BDD (talk) 23:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC) No, we don't do that. - The...
Click to read more »people in accusing that you are pointy. If we keep that, it would just send out the signal that disruptive pointiness is condoned. NotReallySoroka (talk)...
Click to read more »Spanneraol (talk) 14:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Alex is being WP:POINTy and I've already WP:TROUTed him. We have a long standing consensus on how...
Click to read more »the articles on individual events come back to life. This is clearly a pointy nomination with no basis in policy, and no chance at succeeding; and I refuse...
Click to read more »wrestling. InFlamester20 (talk) 05:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep. Bad faith pointy nom. Stems from some MMA articles nominator's been involved in being merged...
Click to read more »even see an argument from the nominator. The nomination seems to the WP:POINTy, anyways. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 00:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy Keep No...
Click to read more »az86556 > haneʼ 04:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC) Speedy keep. This is a WP:POINTy nomination of a user involved at the Talk:Passport dispute. Those articles...
Click to read more »Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Delete. This looks like a WP:POINTy creation in order to include yet more crufty on the list of awards for Britney...
Click to read more »cases such as this and to continue to bring these to Afd seems to be WP:POINTy behaviour and rather a waste of time. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:55, 26...
Click to read more »Lugnuts reverts me, sometimes by just saying me even try to do that was "pointy". He is clearly gaming the system and being disruptive.John Pack Lambert...
Click to read more »two teams from fully-professional leagues. Nominator is indulging in WP:POINTY editing and would be advised to stop. GiantSnowman 09:15, 28 November 2018...
Click to read more »Starship/archive2 Featured article candidates/SpaceX Starship/archive3 Pointy end up, flamey end down - Tim Dodd SpaceX Starship is a stainless-steel...
Click to read more »than "it sucks" which isn't a valid reason to delete an article. Seems pointy. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 13:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »claims. The edit summaries by S&M are pretty suspicious as well, quoting WP:POINTY, and suggest taking to talk. Also they both use the mint and NDTV source...
Click to read more »notable genre. The list has a clear inclusion criteria. I feel this is a POINTY nomination by Curb Chain, after a similar list was kept. Lugnuts (talk)...
Click to read more »articles be deleted from Wikipedia as well. Also, AfD nominator is being Pointy, having nominated several dozen articles in the course of a single day,...
Click to read more »blocked) Supporting evidence: The above puppets were all blocked for making POINTy usernames and oddly claiming they were somehow legit (Bonerfide was claiming...
Click to read more »reached or not. Andrew Davidson says that this is a POINTy AFD and I am asking him what is POINTy about it and am yet to receive a credible answer. As...
Click to read more »editing that could make this appropriate mainspace?" Now shove off with your Pointy nominations. Hasteur (talk) 02:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC) Comment – The rationale...
Click to read more »decidedly pointy. Stalwart111 01:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC) Comment: Contrary to User Stalwart111’s assertion above, there is nothing pointy in this MFD...
Click to read more »deleting articles that meet WP:GNG for this reason, I don't want to be WP:POINTY. Please see WT:CSD#G5 for more discussion on this matter. Thanks, North...
Click to read more »05:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC) Keep and close - clearly a vexatious and WP:POINTY nomination. St★lwart111 06:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Aside from a pointy WP:IDONTLIKEIT !vote, there are no arguments for deletion aside from the...
Click to read more »come back down to stage level and land on the star trap after the nasty pointy spikes had fallen back into place (hopefully). And if the points hadn't...
Click to read more »for "always". - The word "presumed" is not a synonym for "assured". DexterPointy (talk) 21:32, 31 July 2018 (UTC) You do realize that WP:Notability is itself...
Click to read more »encyclopedic content (emphasis mine).. are you going to MfD User:TheresNoTime/Pointy? ~TNT (talk • she/her) 21:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC) Oppose: I firmly believe...
Click to read more »rather than in a navbox, so that's a plus. I also hope this is not a WP:POINTy nom. UnpetitproleX (talk) 21:39, 2 August 2025 (UTC) What is 'NPOV hot potato'...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC) Strong Keep - seems like an extremely WP:POINTy nomination. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC) Strong Keep, this...
Click to read more »other discussions) and Badagnani. In addition, this mass nomination is too POINTY. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »anything Alex nominates, reflexively. This is looking more than a little pointy. Ravenswing 17:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC) Keep per above. WP:SNOW. – Muboshgu...
Click to read more »assertion of notability per WP:NALBUMS, and no evidence of it. This is a WP:POINTy creation, intended solely to increase the link count on Template:Doogie...
Click to read more »21:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Sarcastic support Yes, there's no way this pointy move will cause more arguments. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:00, 26 February 2014...
Click to read more »for Human Rights.I.Casaubon (talk) 01:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC) Delete - Pointy POV fiesta. I'd call it an original essay, but that would be giving this...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:57, 1 April 2020 (UTC) WP:POINTy disruption reverted. - BilCat (talk) 08:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Its not POINTy disruption, its showing what the...
Click to read more »are attacked personally, faced with overtly uncivil comments, vandalism, pointy or disruptive editing. WikiElves promote peaceful interactions and consensus...
Click to read more »synthesis of criticisms that seems a little pointy in its creation. Tarc (talk) 01:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC) How is it pointy to list all the controversies Israel...
Click to read more »Anton Golovaty and merge content there. The article is not a hoax but a WP:Pointy forky creation of an entry under a different name by a user. In fact it...
Click to read more »just revert the nomination as vandalism. As it is, it seems to be a WP:POINTy response to a comment at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Headings Should...
Click to read more »wrestling. InFlamester20 (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep. Bad faith pointy nom. Stems from some MMA articles nominator's been involved in being merged...
Click to read more »based on consensus and discussion. Civility - Is the user bitey, uncivil, pointy, or bad faith assuming? A reviewer should check to see if the user stays...
Click to read more »Reywas92, Alpha3031, Power~enwiki, El cid, el campeador, XOR'easter, and DexterPointy: --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied...
Click to read more »mainspace during the discussion. AfD'd rather than PROD as it seems a little pointy to ask the creator to agree to his own non-notability. Elen of the Roads...
Click to read more »subject passes criteria for WP:NPROF. Concerns that this AFD might be a WP:POINTY creation did not affect the close. — CactusWriter (talk) 00:17, 19 June...
Click to read more »while WP:BURO is solid policy. You want to change policy, don't do it by pointy AfDs. Scott Mac 17:16, 18 November 2010 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »12:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Keep, perhaps speedy as this does smell a little pointy. That said, the article could do with better sourcing to more firmly establish...
Click to read more »--John (talk) 13:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC) Keep/Speedy Keep per all above. WP:POINTY nomination made despite substantial evidence of notability and sourceabiity...
Click to read more »is debatable whether or not this essay's parent, Wikipedia:BLP2E, is a pointy, bad-faith creation. But this? Quite crystal-clear and quite blatant. This...
Click to read more »nom. Mark K. Bilbo 17:20, 28 November 2005 (UTC) Delete advertising with pointy sticks. RasputinAXP talk contribs 21:47, 28 November 2005 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »—Ruud 11:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC) Note: The nominator was exhibiting WP:POINTY behavior when the nomination occurred. And got banned for vandalism and...
Click to read more »(scientists) Support rename in principle, though preferably with a less pointy target name; I'm saying this for NPOV, even though I personally agree they...
Click to read more »look at the sorry state of the article for WMware's vSphere. -- DexterPointy (talk) 20:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC) Struck content above per WP:SOCKSTRIKE...
Click to read more »20:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Comment I find Count Iblis' chosen title to be pointy and insulting to many of those who participate in discussions of Commons...
Click to read more »agree with ExRat and Badagnani. In addition, this mass nomination is too POINTY. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Keep as above...
Click to read more »articles be deleted from Wikipedia as well. Also, AfD nominator is being Pointy, having nominated several dozen articles in the course of a single day,...
Click to read more »I don't see anything wrong with the article. It definitely seems like a pointy nomination. The article complies with NPOV as best I can tell and is properly...
Click to read more »the other direction, while the picture here is looking towards one of the pointy glass ends depicted in this, which seem to be a notable feature of the building...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Moondyne (talk) 01:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Strong keep. POINTy nomination and nothing more. This is a major event in the AFL calendar....
Click to read more »indicates that this is a notable event, and the nomination is possibly WP:POINTy as it's made by a single purpose account. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »nommed for deletion out of Aussie pride, but nonsense and seems a bit wp:POINTY, too. --doncram 11:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Vetëvendosje. Merge-proposal was done before the nominator placed the WP:POINTy AfD. The Banner talk 23:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC) There is no referenced content...
Click to read more »deproded it I indicated where coverage can be found. This just seems WP:POINTy. --Michig (talk) 20:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC) Apparently those locations are...
Click to read more »consensus - to see what others think. I don't see that as being excessively pointy, either - just as a way of soliciting opinion. Per WP:OWN, this article...
Click to read more »inoffensive and potentially might be used, I'd use it myself but that might look pointy. ϢereSpielChequers 11:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC) Delete since userfy is...
Click to read more »subjects. I also fear it may give the impression that we're being a little pointy. Considering the asserted notability regards him suing Wikimedia, among...
Click to read more »mainstream media. Annette46 (talk) 04:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC) A little pointy, perhaps? Given your stance at this AfD. Epbr123 (talk) 08:26, 18 August...
Click to read more »notable genre. The list has a clear inclusion criteria. I feel this is a POINTY nomination by Curb Chain, after a similar list was kept. Lugnuts (talk)...
Click to read more »quickly. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:25, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete as pointy blatant promotion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:31, 29 April 2010 (UTC) I'm happy...
Click to read more »WP:GNG? Are the sources not reliable? Otherwise I would suggest this is a WP:POINTY nomination and perhaps should be withdrawn. Stalwart111 (talk) 05:31, 29...
Click to read more »probably not oppose a normal request if you made it but this is almost WP:POINTy. An RFA, with its limited community participation, is not the correct way...
Click to read more »discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:12, 12 June 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:CCSI#ACTOR. Pointy-nomination. No questions about extra sources anywhere. The Banner talk 11:30...
Click to read more »Things" "The Wolf and the Lion" "A Golden Crown" "You Win or You Die" "The Pointy End" "Baelor" "Fire and Blood" Game of Thrones: Season 1 (soundtrack) Game...
Click to read more »touch upon the subject of PRODding FA Cup winners, which all seems rather POINTy). Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC) Restore redirect and close. Disruptive pointy nomination. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:24, 12 April 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »article promoted almost two years ago, but I wonder if we aren't seeing some pointy-ness going on in the Football nominations. Was there any attempt to resolve...
Click to read more »on list of animals that never display homosexual behavior sounds very WP:POINTy. There is a reason why biologists study the occurrence of homosexual behaviors...
Click to read more »attempts to get anything related to the topic of suicide lately seems very WP:POINTY to me and this seems an inappropriate use of MFD. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy keep. This appears to be a WP:POINTy disruptive nomination in response to the deletion of their article at Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »likely to spawn further socks. There is some sort of political / caste pointy editing happening here. Fiddle Faddle 16:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Accused parties...
Click to read more »Axem Titanium (talk) 05:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC) There is a slightly POINTy feel to this nomination as this list was mentioned in another AFD. - Mgm|(talk)...
Click to read more »Chaos (t · c) on 13 Aug 2026; see discussion (6 participants) 18 Jul 2026 – Pointy ears (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Zxcvbnm (t · c) was closed as keep by...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Keep. Well known label with many famous artists. This is a very pointy AFD. Leithp 07:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC) Keep. Rewrite if necessary, but...
Click to read more »Likely WP:SNOWBALL. in fact, this is so absurd that I wonder if it is WP:POINTY.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Delete Notability is not...
Click to read more »this article. Mjroots (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC) Speedy keep WP:POINTy nom- common practice for cities to have flag articles, not as if this one...
Click to read more »this portal. It appears to have been created by Auric as some sort of WP:POINTy response to my comment at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:H. P...
Click to read more »that were opened by that same editor (Imzadi1979) is disruptive. and WP:POINTy. Imzadi 1979 → 23:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Canada}}. Kelly hi! 21:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC) Comment. A mass series of WP:POINTy, WP:WIKIHOUNDing nominations targeting User:Neelix-created articles, as...
Click to read more »Andrew D. has not stated any rationale for removing PROD, making it WP:POINTy and meritless behavior.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 09:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC) WP:POINT...
Click to read more »to support or oppose a specific candidate. They're often perceived as WP:POINTY or clueless. Most RfAs get questions from fewer than 10% of the participants...
Click to read more »--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC) Delete - A bit of a pointy creation to provide support for an AfD. Not a legit MoS suggestion. Tarc...
Click to read more »Speedily. Not the way to resolve issue you have with another operator at best, Pointy nomination at worst. Wikipedia:RFC is over that way if you want to get community...
Click to read more »Derogatory intent trumps multiple independent sources. Some may call this filing POINTy; my intent is not to be disruptive but rather to understand how this article...
Click to read more »the frustration expressed, but this is a disruptive nomination and quite pointy. BusterD (talk) 11:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Keep - While we may not always...
Click to read more »an American one-dollar bill. Wait, where was I? Oh yeah, delete per WP:POINTY.[April Fools!]--AlphaBeta135talk 02:49, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »--DexterPointy (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Merge into section in Sink, which can then reference Stainless steel strainer --DexterPointy (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment: Then cite those books in the article. And I am not being pointy here -- software, even free sofware, doesn't get a free pass on notability...
Click to read more »-- DexterPointy (talk) 21:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Neutral - this does not appear to be one of Ladislav_Fuks's notable novels. -- DexterPointy (talk) 21:56...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy keep. This appears to be a WP:POINTy disruptive nomination in response to the deletion of their article at Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »by the Left Foot Forward which is not a RS. At best, this article is a pointy counterpiece to Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Perhaps some of this...
Click to read more »article but malformed the nomination. Whilst his first AfD was probably pointy, it does appear that a nomination for this article may have some merit,...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy keep. This appears to be a WP:POINTy disruptive nomination in response to the deletion of their article at Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC) Restore redirect and close. Disruptive pointy nomination. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:20, 10 April 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »08:22, 5 March 2018 (UTC) Oppose - Fails to adhere to WP:VERIFIABILITY. WP:POINTy nomination per active discussion being held at Talk:Human mission to Mars...
Click to read more »yesterday, and other earlier media articles, such as this. Also seems a bit pointy to nominate an article that's over 10 years, the day after his well-reported...
Click to read more »retired user. Serves no purpose whatsoever, almost seems like they were WP:POINTy because they were all the user's last edits. The rest are image galleries...
Click to read more »incorrect edit summaries "Fix refs and minor fixes using AWB" to boot)? How WP:POINTy can you get? Fram (talk) 06:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC) Note: I have added...
Click to read more »10+ tags on a stub with a wet noodle. That really is pointless and yet pointy all at the same time. Hobit (talk) 02:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »proper place, and his repeated insistence on bringing these here seems POINTY. I further note that he has taken account of this, on a recent posting on...
Click to read more »NonfrostClive (talk) 13:26, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Speedy Keep. Disruptive pointy nomination. Two significant roles in notable productions is good for NACTOR...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep/Speedy Keep, conspicuously invalid nomination rationale, WP:POINTY intent; as the wub points out, no explanation of notability is required...
Click to read more »Available cites may be a little on the thin side, but mainly oppose because WP:POINTy is a misuse of this process. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep. This was possibly a POINTy nomination given a.) this AfD was the user's first edit, b.) the article...
Click to read more »December 2010 (UTC) Speedy Keep. I agree with Oakshade, this smells of pointy socks. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »article for the sole purpose of putting it up for deletion seems kind of WP:POINTy, or at least a weird abuse of process. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:13, 4 July...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. WP:POINTy keep !votes discarded. With no compelling argument against the WP:ATD, closing...
Click to read more »cloning it and swapping every gendered word, as appears to have been the WP:POINTy genesis of Guy Gamer, isn't an automatic keeper if the girl article survives...
Click to read more »NonfrostClive (talk) 13:29, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Speedy Keep. Disruptive pointy nomination. Two significant roles in notable productions is good for NACTOR...
Click to read more »really trust you as an admin. —Giggy 07:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC) STRONGEST POINTY Oppose let's see a total of 503 (undeleted) edits. 18 total edits in wikitalk...
Click to read more »a couple of other non-related edits that day too. IM then went on a WP:POINTy rampage with other badly-formed AfDs and prods, before wasting everyone's...
Click to read more »subject of reliable significant coverage. BTW, this tag-bombing seems a tad pointy; advertisement, primary sources, singles ource, neutral sources – these...
Click to read more »Portal:Mathematics, the creation of this one was pointless, unless it was pointy. Even more clearly than most, created only because creating portals was...
Click to read more »proper place, and his repeated insistence on bringing these here seems POINTY. I further note that he has taken account of this, on a recent posting on...
Click to read more »From what I can see of the nominator's edit history, this strikes me as a POINTy nomination. Should be struck down. – PeeJay 15:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »italicized, in black color, with the i in Obelisk replaced by a tall, black, pointy obelisk.[49] The header featured a digitally illustrated sun eclipsed by...
Click to read more »articles be deleted from Wikipedia as well. Also, AfD nominator is being Pointy, having nominated several dozen articles in the course of a single day,...
Click to read more »