Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:PNJCSWP:PNJCS WP:POTENTIALWP:POTENTIAL WP:TIMELIMITWP:TIMELIMIT WP:NOTIMELIMITWP:NOTIMELIMIT...
Click to read more »DGG ( talk ) 06:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC) Keep, but with improvements or PNJCS. Thank you, @DGG:, for copying those citations and links. I agree that it...
Click to read more »article, but a good bit of this could be merged per WP:PRESERVE and WP:PNJCS. The Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject has been working on merging relevant...
Click to read more »rust of taking a few years off from AfC. Hopefully this can fall under WP:PNJCS or maybe User:Tiraboschi will be able to come up with at least one solid...
Click to read more »see "Why deletion of articles with potential should be avoided" under WP:PNJCS. Please also see WP:DEL-REASON - only when you can't find sources is this...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) (repeatD) also due to WP:Policies WP:CHANCE, WP:DEMOLISH, WP:PNJCS, WP:BITE, and WP:V all say that this article should remain here adn given...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) (repeatD) also due to WP:Policies WP:CHANCE, WP:DEMOLISH, WP:PNJCS, WP:BITE, and WP:V all say that this article should remain here adn given...
Click to read more »article, but a good bit of this could be merged per WP:PRESERVE and WP:PNJCS. The Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject has been working on merging relevant...
Click to read more »rust of taking a few years off from AfC. Hopefully this can fall under WP:PNJCS or maybe User:Tiraboschi will be able to come up with at least one solid...
Click to read more »DGG ( talk ) 06:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC) Keep, but with improvements or PNJCS. Thank you, @DGG:, for copying those citations and links. I agree that it...
Click to read more »notorious people, whether they are actors, politicians, researchers or what. WP:PNJCS - Sure, maybe the list includes some kids that just want their names on...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep - I believe that we should keep this article for now, as per WP:PNJCS and WP:TIND. CaptainDDL (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Merge back...
Click to read more »see "Why deletion of articles with potential should be avoided" under WP:PNJCS. Please also see WP:DEL-REASON - only when you can't find sources is this...
Click to read more »see "Why deletion of articles with potential should be avoided" under WP:PNJCS. Please also see WP:DEL-REASON - only when you can't find sources is this...
Click to read more »notorious people, whether they are actors, politicians, researchers or what. WP:PNJCS - Sure, maybe the list includes some kids that just want their names on...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep - I believe that we should keep this article for now, as per WP:PNJCS and WP:TIND. CaptainDDL (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Merge back...
Click to read more »am still generally opposed to using PLOT as a reason for deletion... WP:PNJCS and all; if an article consists entirely of plot, then it should be cleaned...
Click to read more »