This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Files with common or generic names. (e.g., File:map.png) Shortcuts WP:PCPPWP:PCPP WP:WHITELOCKWP:WHITELOCK Pending changes protection allows unregistered and...
Click to read more »16:36, 31 July 2026 (UTC). PCPP (talk · contribs · logs) Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse. PCPP has for a long time openly...
Click to read more »RFCU cases may exist for this user: Requests for checkuser/Case/PatCheng PCPP (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...
Click to read more »may refer to Wikipedia:Protection policy § Pending changes protection (WP:PCPP) Wikipedia:Pokémon Collaborative Project or Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon...
Click to read more »self-immolation incident, Persecution of Falun Gong.--PCPP (talk) 10:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC) PCPP (talk · contribs) HappyInGeneral (talk · contribs) Dilip rajeev (talk ·...
Click to read more »nz = 130.123.128.47) ; diff)). Reports 14:47:51, Thu Mar 06, 2008 en:user:PCPP <-> masseynews.massey.ac.nz (0%/0%/0% - Added link: masseynews.massey.ac...
Click to read more »finds only 90,300 results, mostly from Falun Gong associated websites.--PCPP (talk) 06:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Keep: Meets WP:V and WP:RS per [1],...
Click to read more »Revolution.[1]. She is also well known in China as historian in her own right.--PCPP (talk) 12:57, 31 December 2010 (UTC) I'd found that source as well (it was...
Click to read more »alleged hounding behavior by PCPP (now banned from FLG content) [100] Shrigley defends alleged hounding behavior by PCPP. (Note, the “other users” he...
Click to read more »precedents such as Allegations of state terrorism by the United States--PCPP 06:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC) Rename to Organ harvesting in China and expand...
Click to read more »unverifiable claims present and little independent coverage on the subject.--PCPP (talk) 10:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Videogame modification lacking notability, fails WP:N--PCPP 07:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. This also reads like adspam....
Click to read more »used here. Wikipedia:Flagged revisions/Sighted versions Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions/Trial Wikipedia:Protecting BLP articles feeler survey WP:PCPP...
Click to read more »here to kindly look into the nature of edits being made by "PCPP", "Bobby Fletcher" etc. PCPP had, a few weeks back, moved the article "Persecution of Falun...
Click to read more »commenting on that the game is supposedly being created. Appears to be vaporware. PCPP (talk) 15:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Note I've discovered a Chinese website [1]...
Click to read more »en:Special:Contributions/Asdfg12345. 13:55:51, Thu Mar 06, 2008 en:user:PCPP <-> english.epochtimes.com (0%/0%/0% - Added link: english.epochtimes.com/news/7-6-22/56782...
Click to read more »TWL) Per WP:IPC. Lacks reliable sources and contains only two entriess. PCPP (talk) 11:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cars included in Gran Turismo 4. Unnotable listcruft.--PCPP 04:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Delete. To elaborate on the somewhat terse nom...
Click to read more »Articles Indonesia-United States relations (history · last edit) from [1]. PCPP (talk) 15:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC) U.S. Department of State work, public domain...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) Delete Also Gears of War weapons should be AFDed as well.--PCPP 03:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete per every arguement ever. How did...
Click to read more »practitioners in China, which covers the same material as the group's causes. PCPP (talk) 06:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC) KeepMerge/Redirect. The last AfD in January...
Click to read more »camp", as no major media besides the Epoch Times has reported the story. --PCPP 10:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Delete - 4 non-wiki ghits, thus unverifiable...
Click to read more »and if kept would suggest that the article be pending change protected (WP:PCPP)--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC) Keep - coverage in RS...
Click to read more »Articles Indonesia-United States relations (history · last edit) from [1]. PCPP (talk) 15:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC) U.S. Department of State work, public domain...
Click to read more »PCPP; No, the entire section in Evidence by Shrigley [84] was dedicated to PCPP prior to my submission of Evidence, so he was already discussed. PCPP...
Click to read more »better sourcing, then a simple solution would be to put the redirect under WP:PCPP and eventually WP:SEMI, should the problem persist. In retaining the article's...
Click to read more »--Thankyoubaby 07:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Keep Notable Survivor contestant. Pcpp 12:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Keep Notable contestant in the game in his...
Click to read more »he is more comparable to the children of Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum.--PCPP (talk) 13:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Those are perhaps not the best examples...
Click to read more »vandalism.--PCPP (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Rather than just criticize the person who opened this complaint, it would be more helpful if PCPP could explain...
Click to read more »average reader. Criticism articles shouldn't be catagorized by critic.--PCPP (talk) 04:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC) Merge back - if article spinouts are necessary...
Click to read more »December 2006 (UTC) Keep As above. Has appeared in primetime TV programs. Pcpp 12:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Keep -- Scorpion 19:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »times. 3 examples for PCPP: User_talk:PCPP#January_2012, User_talk:PCPP#Are_you_deliberately_courting_another_ban? and User_talk:PCPP#July_2016. 2 examples...
Click to read more »adopted a no-nonsense approach to their behavior. --PCPP (talk) 12:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC) PCPP focuses on picking apart the contributions of others...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Reason the page should be deleted PCPP (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2009 (UTC) Article that violates WP:NPOV and WP:FRINGE...
Click to read more »against claims. I'm wondering if this user is related to User:Jacob Peters--PCPP (talk) 15:45, 4 January 2011 (UTC) Hardly. However, there are other suspicious...
Click to read more »summary that PCPP participate in the talk page discussion before further reversions. PCPP reverts for a third time[57] At this point PCPP and Homunculus...
Click to read more »Feb 2011: PCPP: [141], edit summary: "Restored POV intro" Asdfg12345: [142], edit summary: "Reverted 1 edit by PCPP (talk); Bad PCPP! Bad PCPP!. (TW)" These...
Click to read more »against him. --PCPP (talk) 11:35, 7 March 2010 (UTC) Note I've notified Dilip's friend Asdfg of the decision, as well as several admins.--PCPP (talk) 12:06...
Click to read more »of dubious Chinese language forums and blogs. [129][130][131][132][133]--PCPP (talk) 10:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC) hmmm... Arilang talk 10:33, 5 January...
Click to read more »single-purpose accounts that are used to promot Falun Gong.--PCPP (talk) 07:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC) PCPP focuses on picking apart the contributions of others...
Click to read more »notability per WP:N. Should be either moved into a list or deleted entirely.--PCPP 06:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Delete All per nom. --Gavin Collins 08:26, 31...
Click to read more »discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Initiated by PCPP at 05:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Case or decision affected WP:FLG-A. Clauses...
Click to read more »if PCPP had not made the mistake of mentioning Falun Gong in that DR request – which Transporter Man closed as being in violation of WP:FLG-A – PCPP would...
Click to read more »possible to get admin intervention to check on the POV of these articles?--PCPP (talk) 08:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC) One look at the comments at Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#PCPP. - 2/0 (cont.) 21:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC) For a long time now PCPP (talk · contribs) has been engaging in...
Click to read more »discussed on the talk page. The word "persecution" had been changed by User:PCPP in his previous edits. [63] [64] I was trying to get the anonymous IP to...
Click to read more »controversial material in dispite of arbcom result.--PCPP (talk) 08:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC) PCPP, could you take a moment to tell us why is it that almost...
Click to read more »which is about executed death row prisoners.--PCPP (talk) 16:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC) Antilived, PCPP, & Dilip rajeev have all been blocked for edit...
Click to read more »that a topic ban for PCPP on China-related articles would be a good thing, because he deems "disruptive" more than just PCPP's Falun Gong editing, devoting...
Click to read more »aren't addressed, particular Arilang's understanding of Wikipedia policy.--PCPP (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC) I'm inclined to hat that per WP:NPA, but...
Click to read more »of a one-month restriction on China-related articles to be appropriate.--PCPP (talk) 13:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC) I agree we have a problem here. If Zhou...
Click to read more »the sources can be used to draw your own conclusions.--PCPP (talk) 12:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC) PCPP, although you lambaste another editor in this thread for...
Click to read more »ruling damages on the mediation, and as such warrants a topic ban or block .--PCPP (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC) The best that can be said about Dilip...
Click to read more »active articles). In both cases, I would refer back to WP:ROUGHSEMI and WP:PCPP to ensure I am following proper policy. I know there are differing opinions...
Click to read more »request. On July 27, both PatCheng and PCPP were blocked, as PatCheng has been confirmed to be a sock puppet of PCPP who has been topic banned on Falun Gong...
Click to read more »abuses by Happy and Asdfg, and issuing a blanket ban, to be unwarranted.--PCPP (talk) 07:31, 16 January 2010 (UTC) This section is to be edited only by...
Click to read more »Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 14:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC) PCPP (talk · contribs) has been blocked for 48 hours by Blnguyen (talk · contribs ·...
Click to read more »September 2006 (UTC) Created Women's Rugby League World Cup, sourced from here. Pcpp 07:26, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Created London Griffins, please take a look...
Click to read more »here to kindly look into the nature of edits being made by "PCPP", "Bobby Fletcher" etc. PCPP had, a few weeks back, moved the article "Persecution of Falun...
Click to read more »with four major participants: Asdfg12345, Ohconfucius, Dilip rajeev, and PCPP. Of the four, the most clearly-vitriolic is Ohconfucius, and he's been warned...
Click to read more »Falun Gong exclusively.--PCPP 13:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Comment While you are doing that you could also check out PCPP's (contribs) bias, which is...
Click to read more »case where User:PCPP had violated his topic ban by deleting material on Falun Gong. I brought this to the attention of AE, and PCPP was blocked for 24...
Click to read more »(UTC) This should be addressed at WP:COI. I've listed the issue here [194]--PCPP (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC) "Why did the Japanese military have to attack...
Click to read more »parties continued to "express concerns" without actually proving anything.--PCPP (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Note: For ease of access, the merge...
Click to read more »I think at least ArbCom has issued at least one superinjunction, on User:PCPP. I'm not saying sure that regular admins should do the same, however. John...
Click to read more »check [49]. He has previously violated 3RR a little over a year ago [50]--PCPP 08:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC) This user made created the following article...
Click to read more »of a one-month restriction on China-related articles to be appropriate.--PCPP (talk) 13:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC) I agree we have a problem here. If Zhou...
Click to read more »reviewing administrator. User who is submitting this request for enforcement PCPP (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)...
Click to read more »also functionally pointless, as it cannot over-rule the existing policy WP:PCPP and any admin applying protection in such a manner against policy is at risk...
Click to read more »either. In both cases the effects may only be temporarily. I would prefer WP:PCPP--Catflap08 (talk) 19:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC) Oppose – Not needed as BrandenburgG...
Click to read more »for the reasons above (and some others). Per the WP:Protection policy (WP:PCPP): Pending changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high...
Click to read more »sounds like the most sensible option, however it has been requested that PCPP level 2 not be used at this time, per community consensus, or lack thereof...
Click to read more »Pending Change Protection is not restricted to BLP violations, and per WP:PCPP may be used to combat persistent vandalism. Based on the history of the article...
Click to read more »practitioners in China, which covers the same material as the group's causes. PCPP (talk) 06:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC) KeepMerge/Redirect. The last AfD in January...
Click to read more »done till 28 Sep 15). May I request if the admins can consider placing WP:PCPP on this page for indefinite term? Kindly consider. Many thanks, Arun Kumar...
Click to read more »com/ www.voteforchicken.com/ www.joshwolf. 2007-12-28 01:12:02: User en:PCPP (talk - contribs) to en:The Epoch Times (diff). Links: www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article...
Click to read more »Davis Talk 05:42, 2 October 2005 (UTC) Agnte 09:11, 2 October 2005 (UTC) Pcpp 13:27, 2 October 2005 (UTC) --J L C Leung 16:49, 3 October 2005 (UTC) go...
Click to read more »disruptive editors in this topic area (for example, see cases against User:PCPP [99][100] and User:Bobby fletcher [101]). Although it may be a novel interpretation...
Click to read more »Western academics if it is critical to China (Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/PCPP), which spans hundreds or even thousands of articles, yet he got a pass on...
Click to read more »prominent cult critic, without giving support to his personal opinion.--PCPP (talk) 14:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Ross's views are notable and so should be...
Click to read more »already Category:Political repression in the People's Republic of China--PCPP (talk) 09:47, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Comment. Kindly note the presence of...
Click to read more »convicted of, eg Category:Chinese people convicted of subverting state power --PCPP (talk) 04:18, 5 November 2012 (UTC) That is not a bad suggestion, but there's...
Click to read more »Falun Gong, per this AE thread. Sandstein 23:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC) PCPP (talk · contribs) is topic-banned (as per WP:TBAN) from Falun Gong for four...
Click to read more »21 November 2018 (UTC) Keep WP:SEMI's padlock are dark-grey, while WP:PCPP's padlock is blue-gray, so white lock is in Wikipedia:Protection policy/Padlocks#Classic...
Click to read more »show. What is the point in removing it and creating it a few weeks later? Pcpp 08:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC) The point is that then there will be something...
Click to read more »Besides this particular issue, I think the whole guideline (section of PCPP) is vague. First of all, I can't figure out what is level 1 and level 2---at...
Click to read more »finds only 90,300 results, mostly from Falun Gong associated websites.--PCPP (talk) 06:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Keep: Meets WP:V and WP:RS per [35]...
Click to read more »last two rows of the template[1] refused to display themselves properly.--PCPP (talk) 13:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC) That's because {{Navbox with columns}} only...
Click to read more »to pending-changes protection guideline page or similar to accompany WP:PCPP, which is the section of WP:Protection policy devoted to Pending Changes...
Click to read more »compromise. QuackGuru (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC) I recommend WP:PCPP for all pages. Only approved edits will pass, while still allowing IPs and...
Click to read more »anyone knowledgeable definitively answer the question at User talk:John#WP:PCPP behavior on templates? Here or there is fine. Thanks in advance. --John (talk)...
Click to read more »edits that happened later. I at first thought the page had some sort of WP:PCPP, but that doesn't seem to be the case. And when I'm logged in, it shows me...
Click to read more »place on the source, with like 15+ citations on the respective article.--PCPP (talk) 07:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC) I would say it would be fine to cite it...
Click to read more »constructive IP editors or new users. An alternate to Semi protection is WP:PCPP. While we still see that semi protection is often used on large amount of...
Click to read more »little from mainstream media, can it be considered significant coverage?--PCPP (talk) 04:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC) I guess it also depends on how would you...
Click to read more »he is more comparable to the children of Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum.--PCPP (talk) 13:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Those are perhaps not the best examples...
Click to read more »Largoplazo (talk) 16:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC) Largoplazo, I don't think WP:PCPP is going to be the right tool here. The instructions to pending change reviewers...
Click to read more »reasons explained here. T. Canens (talk) 04:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC) PCPP (talk · contribs) blocked 24 hours for violating their topic ban.[12] NW...
Click to read more »Revolution.[25]. She is also well known in China as historian in her own right.--PCPP (talk) 12:57, 31 December 2010 (UTC) I'd found that source as well (it was...
Click to read more »commenting on that the game is supposedly being created. Appears to be vaporware. PCPP (talk) 15:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Note I've discovered a Chinese website [43]...
Click to read more »use. — Hex (❝?!❞) 12:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC) Delete unnecessary animation--PCPP (talk) 05:52, 20 May 2009 (UTC) Keep per Dilip rajeev and HappyInGeneral...
Click to read more »extremely in opposition to what Wikipedia is about.--PCPP (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC) PCPP has no place accusing others of disruptive editing. Just...
Click to read more »called Gao "the biggest 50 cent party of all" with no justification [28]. --PCPP (talk) 09:45, 4 January 2011 (UTC) This issue is not related to a BLP and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cars included in Gran Turismo 4. Unnotable listcruft.--PCPP 04:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Delete. To elaborate on the somewhat terse nom...
Click to read more »Queensland 27 JRA_WestyQld2 (talk · contribs) Not-active North Queensland 28 Pcpp (talk · contribs) Not-active Brisbane Broncos 29 Gozbil (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »views) – (View AfD) Videogame modification lacking notability, fails WP:N--PCPP 07:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. This also reads like adspam....
Click to read more »says on Falun Gong. So how does one decide what and what isn't propaganda?--PCPP (talk) 04:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC) The NPoV solution is to write : Phoenix...
Click to read more »average reader. Criticism articles shouldn't be catagorized by critic.--PCPP (talk) 04:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC) Merge back - if article spinouts are necessary...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Reason the page should be deleted PCPP (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2009 (UTC) Article that violates WP:NPOV and WP:FRINGE...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) Delete Also Gears of War weapons should be AFDed as well.--PCPP 03:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete per every arguement ever. How did...
Click to read more »provides both the views of academics, the PRC government, and Tibetan exiles.--PCPP (talk) 11:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC) Keep -- Nominator's arguments, while interesting...
Click to read more »better sourcing, then a simple solution would be to put the redirect under WP:PCPP and eventually WP:SEMI, should the problem persist. In retaining the article's...
Click to read more »TWL) Per WP:IPC. Lacks reliable sources and contains only two entriess. PCPP (talk) 11:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »notability per WP:N. Should be either moved into a list or deleted entirely.--PCPP 06:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Delete All per nom. --Gavin Collins 08:26, 31...
Click to read more »provides both the views of academics, the PRC government, and Tibetan exiles.--PCPP (talk) 11:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC) Keep -- Nominator's arguments, while interesting...
Click to read more »unverifiable claims present and little independent coverage on the subject.--PCPP (talk) 10:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »notability per WP:N. Should be either moved into a list or deleted entirely.--PCPP 06:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Delete All per nom. --Gavin Collins 08:26, 31...
Click to read more »some administration measrue should be sought for his repeated behavior.--PCPP (talk) 13:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments...
Click to read more »page to check how many edits I have or how long i've been registered for. Pcpp 01:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Keep/Move (to David Tench Tonight) Will the show...
Click to read more »parties continued to "express concerns" without actually proving anything.--PCPP (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Note: For ease of access, the merge...
Click to read more »creation block, or is there not one currently in place? Full protection or PCPP 2 both seem excessive when they're essentially only there to thwart one persistent...
Click to read more »and if kept would suggest that the article be pending change protected (WP:PCPP)--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC) Keep - coverage in RS...
Click to read more »the trial is over; all we could do, in this proposal, is state facts. WP:PCPP policy says, "The trial is now over". It is a mess. So let's not waste time...
Click to read more »Berzinski User:PCGSU11/Robe day User:PCMorphy72/Henry Roy Dean User:PCPP/1938 Kyushu leaflet drop User:PDXrail/Oregon Rail Heritage Foundation...
Click to read more »its Wikipedia article as evidence [59], which I believe violates WP:SYN--PCPP (talk) 10:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC) Runs a research centre in a respectable...
Click to read more »by Born2cycle was closed; see discussion 25 Nov 2010 – Falun Gong RfC by PCPP was closed; see discussion 01 Dec 2010 – Senkaku Islands RfC by Qwyrxian...
Click to read more »won't have an article at all!" Jay Maynard 13:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Keep Pcpp 11:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Failure to provide a reason to your vote may lead...
Click to read more »(help)" is a reliable source on the Chinese Communist Party's propaganda work. PCPP (talk · contribs) argues that it is not, since "a) is not a suitable academic...
Click to read more »article, Savage has been widely criticized exactly for such behaviors. --PCPP (talk) 07:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC) In principle, if Savage is quoted by...
Click to read more »reverts forth and back since. Users involved Who is involved in the dispute? PCPP (talk · contribs) Keahapana (talk · contribs) Homunculus (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »a cleanup, since it currently reads like a chapter-by-chapter analysis.--PCPP (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2011 (UTC) Thanks for bringing up this issue; interested...
Click to read more »were met with Falun Gong SPAs previously involved in an arbitration case. PCPP (talk) 04:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC) I feel that the article fails WP:Notability...
Click to read more »strongly support the extreme POV over the objections of User:Simonm223, User:PCPP, User:Dilip rajeev, User:Bobby fletcher, User:Ohconfucius, and now myself...
Click to read more »incident was staged, as HappyInGeneral is trying to do.--PCPP (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC) @PCPP "claim was about China's treatment of FLG, not the...
Click to read more »deproded by Salix alba on 18 Apr 2012 16 Apr 2012 – Indie Gala PRODed by PCPP was deproded by Metaborg11 on 18 Apr 2012 17 Apr 2012 – THE "NEXT" MGS PRODed...
Click to read more »December 2006 (UTC) Keep As above. Has appeared in primetime TV programs. Pcpp 12:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Keep -- Scorpion 19:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »El C but I doubt that PCPP will solve the existing problem: the long term ban evasion via IP socking which can continue under PCPP as well. WP:SILVERLOCK...
Click to read more »Western academics if it is critical to China (Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/PCPP), which spans hundreds or even thousands of articles, yet he got a pass on...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PCPP doesn't seem to be cutting it here. wizzito | say hello! 15:12, 15 March...
Click to read more »PCPP aside, it appears that the editors who have been working to resolve this are fully capable of doing so on the article talk page. Prior to PCPP's...
Click to read more »I should have a reply within the next day or so.--PCPP (talk) 07:54, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks, PCPP. I look forward to reading your reply. As embarrassingly...
Click to read more »logs) Pending changes: High level of reversion of edits. Request for WP:PCPP - Srihari Thalla (talk) 18:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra...
Click to read more »WP:OR[1]. The material added by him comes from his own personal website! PCPP (talk) 15:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Resolved – article deleted and redirected...
Click to read more »anti-Boxer POV in Boxer Rebellion was brought to AN/I, on Jan 5th 2011 User:PCPP brought Arilang's POV-warring and dubious Chinese translations to AN/I, on...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – PCPP has failed with recent sock and proxy IP edits. Austronesier (talk) 13:11...
Click to read more »protection). Looking at the page's history, I think that there is no need for WP:PCPP anymore, let alone an indefinite one. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:18, 15 April...
Click to read more »responses; outside views; delisted due to inactivity. PCPP 2 March 2010 It is alleged that PCPP behaves outside Wikipedia norms in editing pages related...
Click to read more »were met with Falun Gong SPAs previously involved in an arbitration case. PCPP (talk) 04:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC) I feel that the article fails WP:Notability...
Click to read more »articles [113], and has been blocked 3 times previously for edit warring.[114]--PCPP (talk) 10:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC) This is a highly controversial topic and...
Click to read more »| history | links | watch | logs) Reason: High level of IP vandalism. WP:PCPP for a few weeks should be enough here. Reptain (talk) 22:04, 3 October 2022...
Click to read more »(Article history). Some protection would be really appreciated; I think PCPP for a month or two might be a good start, until the game is announced (it’s...
Click to read more »show. What is the point in removing it and creating it a few weeks later? Pcpp 08:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC) The point is that then there will be something...
Click to read more »expiration date specified, by administrator User:Mark Arsten. Per the WP:PCPP policy, "indefinite PC protection should be used only in cases of severe...
Click to read more »amount of ongoing vandalism and because the edit rate is too high for PC (WP:PCPP: Pending changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high...
Click to read more »page to check how many edits I have or how long i've been registered for. Pcpp 01:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Keep/Move (to David Tench Tonight) Will the show...
Click to read more »camp", as no major media besides the Epoch Times has reported the story. --PCPP 10:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Delete - 4 non-wiki ghits, thus unverifiable...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PCPP added 4 May 2016. Since that time, article edits have all been persistent...
Click to read more »logs) Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – according to WP:PCPP I request pending changes protection, this is WP:BLP and many unregistered...
Click to read more »protection level: From semi-protection to pending changes protection WP:PCPP. This page is well patrolled by editors and some of the latest and more reliable...
Click to read more »recent days. 219.79.181.149 (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Note: Article WP:PCPP --Moxy (talk) 15:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Question: Did you ask Samsara? CambridgeBayWeather...
Click to read more »noq (talk) 11:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC) Pending-changes protected I know WP:PCPP is unpopular, but it would seem to me the best option here. --Shirt58 (talk)...
Click to read more »Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page has already PCPP, but is currently subject to massive vandalism and disruption following a...
Click to read more »Notecardforfree was promoted by Delldot; discussion 25 Nov 2010 – Falun Gong RfC by PCPP was closed; see discussion 23 Dec 2010 – 2010 in LGBT rights RfC by NuclearWarfare...
Click to read more »routine editing disputes. The reasons for pending changes protection, per WP:PCPP, are: persistent vandalism, violations of the biographies of living persons...
Click to read more »article adheres to WP:FRINGE, or provide undue weight to Higashinakano et al.--PCPP (talk) 09:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC) My language skills are non-existent...
Click to read more »won't have an article at all!" Jay Maynard 13:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Keep Pcpp 11:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Failure to provide a reason to your vote may lead...
Click to read more »25 May 2011 – People's Republic of China – South Korea relations RfC by PCPP was closed; see discussion 26 Jun 2011 – Shanghai RfC by Xiaoyu of Yuxi was...
Click to read more »great public interest currently. Can someone set the Hotez page up for WP:PCPP? Visitgoths (talk) 03:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC) This content should certainly...
Click to read more »25 May 2011 – People's Republic of China – South Korea relations RfC by PCPP was closed; see discussion 18 Jun 2011 – Samguk Sagi RfC by Oppa was closed;...
Click to read more »[16] [17], and Falun Gong itself is known to pull off stunts like this. // PCPP (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC) It sounds as if this is significant in the...
Click to read more »scenario. Vacationnine 18:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC) Declined According to WP:PCPP, pending changes protection shouldn't be added to pages with a high edit...
Click to read more »talk) edited Para-Chlorophenylpiperazine (diff, hist) Changed: 'image' ('pCPP-structure.png' -> '4-Chlorophenylpiperazine-ifa.png') 13:59:43 (3, 2, 4)...
Click to read more »Jan 26, 2011 - user:PCPP - user talk (contribs) on page PC PowerPlay (diff - undo) -> (overlap) Username overlaps with pagename: 'pcpp'-'pc powerplay' =...
Click to read more »Berzinski User:PCGSU11/Robe day User:PCMorphy72/Henry Roy Dean User:PCPP/1938 Kyushu leaflet drop User:PDXrail/Oregon Rail Heritage Foundation...
Click to read more »"photographic anaylsis" section is the most troublesome, as it borderlines WP:OR.--PCPP (talk) 14:04, 31 March 2012 (UTC) The usual cosmetics woo. But it was written...
Click to read more »Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com ) 10:15:37, Fri Dec 28, 2007 - user:PCPP - user talk:PCPP (contribs; 1/1) Monitored link - masseynews.massey.ac...
Click to read more »tiflucarbine) Arylpiperazines (e.g., 2C-B-PP, 2-NP, mCPP, MK-212, ORG-12962, pCPP, pFPP, quipazine, TFMPP, VCU-1012) Dihydrobenzoxazines (e.g., efavirenz)...
Click to read more »• Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com . 14:47:51, Thu Mar 06, 2008 - user:PCPP - user talk (contribs) on page Third party views on Falun Gong (diff) ->...
Click to read more »good. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC) According to WP:PCPP, Readers who are not logged in (the vast majority of readers) are shown the...
Click to read more »semi-protection: Since the page's protection level was lowered to indef WP:PCPP after a 16-year WP:SEMI reign, all edits have been instances of vandalism...
Click to read more »realized it's the only article of the ~800 on my watchlist that is under WP:PCPP. (Incidentally, the barrier to getting PCR permissions would be reasonably...
Click to read more »(UTC) Mark Kelly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: PCPP: Unregistered users are vandalizing contentious BLP. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172...
Click to read more »ethnic categories mentioned in the article "Ethnicity in Afghanistan" 1 year PCPP for all 421 districts of Afghanistan + their capitals (if there is one),...
Click to read more »15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC) Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for...
Click to read more »of indefinite WP:ECP/WP:SEMI you guys imposed recently and indefinite WP:PCPP still being in place for those pages?~2026-26046-07 (talk) 11:24, 29 April...
Click to read more »your reasoning. As a comprise, are you more comfortable with a temporary WP:PCPP trial instead? Giovanni Potage (talk) 08:56, 1 October 2025 (UTC) 2025 Cebu...
Click to read more »about a week now. I recommend that the Pending Changes Protection Policy (WP:PCPP) should be implemented. RevMSWIE500 (talk) 06:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC) Semi-protected...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Reason: IP vandalism is resurging after a bout last March. WP:PCPP would be fine. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 18:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this discussion. @Matticusmadness: PCP meant WP:PCPP. Anarchyte (talk) 03:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC) Wow, I did eat the wrong end of...
Click to read more »from performing edits, but they're hidden from unregistered readers. See WP:PCPP for more information. DonIago (talk) 17:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC) Ah, okay...
Click to read more »probably at the point of needing indefinite protection; maybe start with WP:PCPP and go up to semi if needed? Sariel Xilo (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Reason: Semi-protected indefinitely over a year. Can they be downed to WP:PCPP? Also, one of the users who protected the pages does not seem to be an administrator...
Click to read more »PCPP 9 15:55, 9 March 2010 17:43, 15 March 2010 6 days, 01:48:00 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive57#PCPP Gilabrand 2 8...
Click to read more »vandalism continues after expiry of temporary protection. Requesting WP:PCPP. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 04:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC) Pending-changes protected for...
Click to read more »Flags (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Requesting WP:PCPP or WP:SEMI due to IP vandalism. The vandalism targets the company's executives...
Click to read more »the relatively niche nature of the article's subject, I would suggest WP:PCPP or WP:SEMI at most, so as not to exclude too many editors from participating...
Click to read more »Reason: This has had ongoing disruption from the subject the article is about. PCPP may be required here to stop BLP violations pertaining to COI. 11WB (talk)...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) This is an article being hit with periodic vandalsim, and WP:PCPP says it should be used for BLP violations, which is why I suggested it. SEMI...
Click to read more »