Protection restricts the modification of pages to specific groups of users. Pages are protected when there is disruption that cannot be prevented through...
Click to read more »{{Pp-pc1/sandbox}} is transcluded at the top of this page, and the page is protected with pending changes level 1....
Click to read more »either all articles or only ones of the highest quality and/or importance. PC1 protection requires that a reviewer approve any revision by an anonymous...
Click to read more »criteria for use: The criteria for autoconfirmed pending changes protection ("PC1") are met but the latter has proven ineffective, and blocks would be ineffective...
Click to read more »Pending changes/Testing/8 Pending changes/Testing/9 Pending changes/Testing/Pp-pc1 If you have issues or comments, add them at Wikipedia talk:Pending changes...
Click to read more »print using ricoh and Epson and with PC1 can only print with epson. So PC2 can see ricoh but PC1 cant, and PC1 network is working since it can use internet...
Click to read more »(SELECT Count(PC1.Student_ID) FROM Student_Certs AS PC1 WHERE Student_Certs.Student_ID = PC1.Student_ID GROUP BY PC1.Student_ID HAVING Count(PC1.Student_ID)...
Click to read more »January 2013 (UTC) Oppose. A little ironic, because I like PC2 and detest PC1, but with the amount of dishonesty that went on with the original implementation...
Click to read more »months (after usage of PC1) there would be analysis of what we've learned from the PC1 trial. No concrete evidence proving that PC1 has helped us (that I...
Click to read more »visible to IP users). It has two levels, referred to as PC1 and PC2. A page configured to use PC1 requires that edits made by new or anonymous users be...
Click to read more »involved converting a semi-protected article to Pending Changes Level 1 (PC1). There may be articles that were previously not under any form of protection...
Click to read more »geolocate. Tying all of this together is an apparent misunderstanding of how PC1 works and protestations that they've been prevented from editing. -- ferret...
Click to read more »PC1 and PC2, it can open their shared folders -PC3 can access the internet -PC1 and PC2 can ping each other and open each other's shared folders -PC1...
Click to read more »pages like you already do when removing tags: Get all transclusions of pp-pc1 and pp-pc2 Get the list of all flagged pages with their protection levels...
Click to read more »(UTC) You read it right, PC1 is completely useless combined with semi-protection. Semi blocks all IP (and unconfirmed) edits and PC1 requires that all IP...
Click to read more »14:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC) Unenthusiastic support as better than nothing. PC1 seems kind of pointless as it would only restrict brand-new users in most...
Click to read more »User:Mrprivate123 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff - DELETED) - Link: vietnamnaturalstone.vn/basalt-pc1 (R/Xmeta/L) Displayed all 2 additions....
Click to read more »alkaline battery. Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Science/2019 May 13 PC1 vs PC3 Sailing into the sun in a submarine made of ice Bergsonian Time How...
Click to read more »that the x-axis, with ticks at 0.05, 0.00, −0.05 and -0.10, is labelled "PC1 (0.45%)" and that the y-axis, with ticks at −0.15, -0.10, -0.05, 0.00, 0...
Click to read more »exceptional, considering F1 Racing is somewhat popular. That being said, I've protected the article (PC1). ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »above your own access level - so you will only be able to add for ECP/SP/PC1 - will this still be useful at this level? — xaosflux Talk 16:08, 21 January...
Click to read more »Blocking master for 2 weeks as well as 205.xxx . I've semi-protected and added PC1 to a couple of target articles. Since some of these IPs have gone stale,...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff - DELETED) - Link: vietnamnaturalstone.vn/basalt-pc1 (R/Xmeta/L) Displayed 2 additions out of 2 total. For more info see...
Click to read more »I've semi-protected the Potential Superpowers page for 1 month and added PC1 protection indefinitely. If there be socks then this would flush them out...
Click to read more »that however. For the time being I've semi-protected the article and added PC1 protection. Closing. — Berean Hunter (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. While Kww will typically downgrade PC2-protected articles to PC1 or semi-protection, in this case he increased the level of protection (to...
Click to read more »block duration for the static IP. I also placed some semi-protections and PC1 for six months. Closing. — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC) Template:Pp-pc1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) I'd like a wider discussion...
Click to read more »bar of SP and PC1 isn't helpful, but FP can be overkill. PC2 seems a superior alternative to FP in these cases. I don't believe that PC1/PC2 make a lot...
Click to read more »yourself against claims. Closing, page semi-protected 1 month + 1 year of PC1. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Suspected sockpuppets 99.14...
Click to read more »CheckPage admins took 5-7 days to get my name in the list. I would go with PC1/PC2 instead of full protection of the CheckPage. --QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 05:28, 15...
Click to read more »discussions.) That said, pre-emptive implementation of PC1 goes against the policy at WP:PC1. I also haven't been able to find any info on what the actual...
Click to read more »explanation. So 1 states: PC2 should be usable in the same situations as PC1 (i.e. cases of persistent vandalism, BLP violations, or copyright violations)...
Click to read more »comments. I used PC1 a fair bit but PC2 only once, where there was an issue of libel. I found PC2 very helpful in that case. I found PC1 very useful on...
Click to read more »WP:DUCKy. Blocked IP for two weeks as it is WP:DUCKy too. Page protected with PC1, although if another admin (or user) wants to change this to semi-protection...
Click to read more »April 2014 (UTC) I am getting repeated vandalism to my talk page. Requesting PC1 protection. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2014 (UTC) Semi-protection...
Click to read more »Protect recognized content and vital articles with Level 1 PC protection. PC1 protection will still allow everyone to edit the article—it will only require...
Click to read more »(There were earlier RfCs which also dealt with when to use PC1.) Of course, if you feel that PC1 is being in ways that are unhelpful in some instances, you're...
Click to read more »long called for locking-down most articles. Why not put automatically put PC1 on GAs and fully lock FAs? GAs and FAs don't need the help any n00b could...
Click to read more »policy added 11 October 2016, archived November 6, 2016 Expanding usage of PC1 protection added 6 November 2016, archived November 7, 2016 Creative Commons...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) The system seems to be working then, Unprotected > PC1 > Semi > PC2 >Full. PC1 was tried and found not to be appropriate, so the level of protection...
Click to read more »June 2013 (UTC) Ok, no one has responded in over an hour, so I'll request PC1 on the feedback. Darrman (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2013 (UTC) I don't think pending...
Click to read more »all. Now, I perform a very simple operation: I unplug the RJ45 cable from PC1 (XP) and plug it to PC2 (Vista), PC2 gets a 169.254.x.x address and, obviously...
Click to read more »exclusive to semi-protection; the heiarchy of protection would go free -> PC1 -> Semi -> PC2 -> Full. Sceptre (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC) Support...
Click to read more »I need clarification, My guess is this is related to vector math, where PC1 and PC3 are two perpendicular vectors and R is the resultant of the two....
Click to read more »to semi (and used PC1 instead of semi at WP:RFPP a lot). It seems less than ideal with high-traffic pages, and I had to change PC1 to semi several times...
Click to read more »(edit conflict) Indefinite PC1?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC) I will admit a bias that says all BLPs should have indef PC1 at a minimum, so that would...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »articles that are unprotected, or only under pending changes protection (PC1), have their talk pages protected, allowing editing but not discussion. Most...
Click to read more »the same as not having it, and it seems an unnecessary gray space between PC1 and ECP, even if I can make myself imagine some IAR instances involving BLP...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) PC2 is complicated to administer, and somewhat confusing. (so is PC1, but the combination would make them yet more confusing). EPC has the advantage...
Click to read more »Note here, where cluebot properly reverted a vandal, but because of pp-pc1 the page was left with this gem of a first sentence: Freedom Riders were...
Click to read more »21:13, 21 December 2017 (UTC) comment would it be better, perhaps, to use PC1? seems to me, aht it's a useful way to allow ipusers and new registered to...
Click to read more »- 2¢ 16:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC) You mean PC1, right? AFAICT, PC2 has effectively been deprecated... A long-term PC1 would definitely a good way to go in this...
Click to read more »policy. If memory serves, it was considered important at the time to limit PC1 in terms of time as it was thought we might end up in a situation where progress...
Click to read more »account) if the Pending Changes policy was firmly such that it (at least in its PC1 form; I can see PC2 on article that would otherwise get full protection)...
Click to read more »pending changes protection at WP:RFPP in your past 40 or so requests since PC1 was approved in 2012 [3] and I was wondering in what, if any, cases you'd...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Result: Semiprotected three months. Another admin had tried PP-PC1 but during the time it was active it had not stopped the constant reverting...
Click to read more »edit war, right? I have semi-protected the article for one month and added PC1 indefinitely to curtail the obvious IP socking. Had you filed this report...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Done, of course if it ends up being spammed by AC editors then PC1 may need to be reapplied (or bumped to EC protection). Primefac (talk) 22:30...
Click to read more »active in the past there and try to detect similarities. I think that was why PC1 was rejected for fighting socks as well. Monty845 20:50, 10 January 2013...
Click to read more »and Africa (figs. (figs.1A,1A, ,1B,1B, and and2).2). In these figures, PC1 appears to separate the Africans from the other populations, whereas PC2...
Click to read more »October 2014 (UTC) I've semi-protected some articles for a month and added PC1 as well. Closing. — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:57, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Suspected...
Click to read more »well ;-) I've applied PC1 for two weeks. The article is a BLP, and recently protected (semi) for precisely the reasons you mention. PC1 will allow the "good"...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Looks like we will need a template editor to edit Template:pp-pc1 Gamebuster (Talk)║Contributions) 07:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Support: Looks...
Click to read more »the subject that edit such pages relatively rapidly (which contraindicates PC1, let alone PC2) how the hell would PC2 help? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:40, 12...
Click to read more »(UTC) Looks like someone added PC1 protection to the page. Maybe I will warm up to it later, but I really don't care for PC1, especially on these busier...
Click to read more »IPs) would be overkill. I've semi-protected for 3 months; if someone thinks PC1 is better, feel free to change to that without asking me first, I'm fairly...
Click to read more »unsubtle. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 08:32, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Shirt58 has applied PC1 but I don't think that will make much difference because it looks like the...
Click to read more »other admin, this is my suggestion.--v/r - TP 00:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC) Meh, PC1 seemed to be a good idea, infinitely DP 00:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC) Thanks...
Click to read more »September 2016; and also PC1, expiring 13:08, 22 October 2016. Of course, the presence of the semi-protection means that the PC1 is presently ineffective;...
Click to read more »may be resulting in confusion between our article and Wikileaks itself. PC1 might be more appropriate here, but I leave that to other admins to consider...
Click to read more »history of the article, the only question to me is whether it should stay with PC1, or be raised to semi-protection. Monty845 00:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC) Tim...
Click to read more »I expect will ever have on this wiki). However, that being said, perhaps PC1 protection to the whole page would be more appropriate in this case, no?...
Click to read more »article to add stuff that is not even true. The article is configured with PC1 protection, but it sounds like they are trying to cause harm to the article...
Click to read more »Lola T370 Lyncar L006 Maki F101 March 741 March 751 Parnelli VPJ4 Penske PC1 Shadow DN3 Shadow DN5 Shadow DN7 Surtees TS16 Tyrrell 007 Williams FW01 Williams...
Click to read more »NeutralHomer • Talk • 09:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC) The article's currently under PC1 protection (which IMHO is good for low traffic articles, especially BLPs)...
Click to read more »PB6 PB7 PB8 PB9 | PB-0 PB-1 PB-2 PB-3 PB-4 PB-5 PB-6 PB-7 PB-8 PB-9 PC0 PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7 PC8 PC9 | PC-0 PC-1 PC-2 PC-3 PC-4 PC-5 PC-6 PC-7...
Click to read more »autoconfirmed non-reviewer needs to have their edit accepted is when the page is on PC1 and currently has pending changes from non-autoconfirmed users. (Or when...
Click to read more »rather than later, and your suggestion feels more like a PC2 thing than a PC1 thing to me ... I wouldn't object to throwing that on the pile of things...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and placing EDreams under PC1, I was alerted on my talk pagethat some undisclosed COI editing may have...
Click to read more »that are displayed in the top right corner of a page, I have created {{pp-pc1}}, and {{pp-pc2}} to tag accordingly to protected pages.—cyberpower OnlineMerry...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC) I give it 3 days of semi, and extended PC1 for another 3 months in light of the ongoing issues. Monty845 23:49, 30 July...
Click to read more »Lola T370 Lyncar L006 Maki F101 March 731 March 741 Parnelli VPJ4 Penske PC1 Shadow DN1 Shadow DN3 Surtees TS16 Token RJ02 Trojan T103 Tyrrell 004 Tyrrell...
Click to read more »EvergreenFir (talk) 22:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC) I've semi-protected the page. PC1 is fine for normal vandalism, but stuff like this still sits in the history...
Click to read more »20:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Kannada people is also under attack, though it's PC1 so it's being caught. Primefac (talk) 21:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Lingayatism...
Click to read more »enough disruption to warrant semi protection, but there is likely enough for PC1 I would think. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 12:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »him from bypassing pending changes. Any autoconfirmed editor will bypass PC1, and there's no consensus to enable PC2 on English Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate...
Click to read more »addresses are too scattered. We do have the option of semi-protection or pc1. As "Go Away Little Girl" has been suffering since the first week of March...
Click to read more »January 2016 (UTC) Just curious, is there a reason the article's set to PC1 instead instead of full SPP? - The Bushranger One ping only 08:30, 22 January...
Click to read more »would probably be a better option than either rangeblocks or the current PC1. —DoRD (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC) Okay, I'll try a semi-protect...
Click to read more »the logs are confusing you. Cullen328 changed protection from indefinite PC1 i.e. anyone can edit but edits by non auto-confirmed editors (editors not...
Click to read more »2 April 2016 (UTC) Yes, range blocks are unworkable. Semi-protection or PC1 are the options available. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Semi-protected the article for six months for the slow edit-warring and added PC1. — Berean Hunter (talk) 21:49, 16 August 2014 (UTC) that is creepy poetic...
Click to read more »statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks. @Black Kite:, what is PC1? I'm happy with whatever works best to stop the disruptive edits. Mabuska...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Semi-protected indefinitely and added PC1. — Berean Hunter (talk) 03:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC) I didn't leave talk...
Click to read more »downgrade protection on low-traffic, long-term semi'd BLPs from semi to PC1. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC) Yes, BUT it should be...
Click to read more »problems. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC) I would support PC1 protection on archives (this would make it more obvious to all if vandalism...
Click to read more »OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC) I've added PC1 indefinitely to his target articles and semi-protected for a month. — Berean...
Click to read more »series of edits, including the unjustified removal of the template {{pp-pc1}}. The repeated rapid jumping between IPs does not look like reallocation...
Click to read more »to do anything specific at this time, although either semiprotecting or PC1 would not be out of the question. Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2015...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »Click on Correct token and resubmit at the bottom See if it added 1 hour of PC1 to Foo or if it failed (get the failure message). — xaosflux Talk 18:46,...
Click to read more »14 Template:F1 cars 1972 -> Brabham BT33 Brabham BT34 Brabham BT37 Connew PC1 Eifelland 21 March 711 March 721 Matra MS120 Surtees TS14 Surtees TS9 Tecno...
Click to read more »2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2) Shortcut WP:DC2016WP:DC2016...
Click to read more »Windows XP, and in both Monobook and Vector I see the top icon for {{pp-pc1}} overlapped by File:Sound-icon.svg; to their right is the top icon for {{good...
Click to read more »created page that, in the same way that unaccepted non-autoconfirmed edits on PC1-protected pages are not visible to anyone except reviewers (and admins of...
Click to read more »version of pp-pc1, and didn't give clashes with other icons too much thought. That was obviously an error - my apologies about that. The {{pp-pc1}} template...
Click to read more »Christiania had to be accepted by a reviewer? The article is configured to PC1 so autoconfirmed people should be automatically accepted provided there are...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) @EoRdE6:, thanks for the response, and I will admit that the PC1 vs. PC2 thing is something I was dimly aware off, but had forgotten the details...
Click to read more »(UTC) How did this edit get automatically accepted? The page is under WP:PC1, and the user isn't autoconfirmed yet. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:39, 8 August...
Click to read more »protected. Is it server synchronisation lag, or a bug? Interference with PC1? Samsara 11:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC) You fully protected and your next edit...
Click to read more »article is also SPP, so everyone editing it will be autoconfirmed, making the PC1 mostly moot. — xaosflux Talk 21:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC) They have only made...
Click to read more »{{Pp-extendedconfirmed}} → {{pp-extended}} {{Pp-move-indef}} → {{pp-move}} {{Pp-pc1}} → {{pp-pc}} {{Sprotect2}}, {{Sprotected2}} → {{pp-semi-indef}} {{Pp-semi-sock}}...
Click to read more »like PC1 as an alternative to semi, but it's a royal pain if edit count picks up. I'm restored semi on a few articles that were dropped to PC1 for the...
Click to read more »protected pages (semi). It should be a relativiely easy rename because {{Pp-pc1}} should be the one of the few (if not only) change required. Callanecc (talk...
Click to read more »page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC) File:Pc1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Metal_Loaf (notify | contribs)...
Click to read more »in this proposal, I can tell them apart fairly well (though the semi and PC1 locks still look the same color no matter where I see them). With a lock...
Click to read more »been a very small number of accepted exceptions) for six months or so after PC1 was available. There's nothing there that says PC2 may absolutely never be...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Image:PC1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hardouin (notify | contribs). Orphaned, replaced by Image:PC1.png. JaGatalk 08:10...
Click to read more »is necessary. I'm sure most of those semi-protections could be lowered to PC1, but I'm not in a position to make those changes. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e...
Click to read more »pending changes used more often but the community only seems willing to apply PC1 (or PC2) for editor behavior issues rather than preventative content protection...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) I made a good-faith revert using STiki to Drake (rapper) (pp-pc1), and it did not automatically accept my change, but I have the reviewer...
Click to read more »(UTC) Semi-prot the page? --Redrose64 (talk) 17:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC) PC1 protection maybe? Technical 13 (talk) 18:57, 3 December 2013 (UTC) An WP:Edit...
Click to read more »padlock icons need to be manually added; you can do it yourself with {{pp-pc1}}. Regarding the logs, that page was recently moved after it had been protected...
Click to read more »September 2014 (UTC) I would be more supportive of being able to enable PC1 or SPP levels of protection only in own-userspace; assuming your primary...
Click to read more »Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous Village pump (proposals) archive This page contains discussions that have been archived...
Click to read more »—Kww(talk) 04:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Remember articles are still under PC1, so reviewers need to review edits to them by IPs/new editors. BethNaught...
Click to read more »think of this from some use cases, for example: There is a good page with PC1 An IP makes some small vandalism (like changes a date) A good faith editor...
Click to read more »article subject to pending changes indefinitely, to a greater level than PC1. The amended PC2 was to include autoconfirmed users for review as well, but...
Click to read more »with articles of high targets of vandalism/sockpuppetry. This is mostly for PC1. Can't really say anything for PC2 since this wasn't really tested. @TheDJ:...
Click to read more »(talk · ctb) 00:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Retracting a lot, didn't read the pc1 expiry clearly. It looks like Cyberbot II removed the template just 9 minutes...
Click to read more »good one? See Matt Smith (actor). All I was trying to do was add a {{pp-pc1}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Why does the system keep...
Click to read more »on a PC2-protected page similar to how confirmed/autoconfirmed works on a PC1-protected page now. This chart might be helpful. Since PC level 2 wasn't...
Click to read more »logged - semi-protection on 8th January 2014. However, the page appears to be PC1 protected. Am I missing something? Is it just displaying differently for...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »see if there's consensus for extending PC1 there, or for a PC3, that would be restricted to template editors. PC1 would be only for non-complex medium-risk...
Click to read more »anything from the edit warring perspective. There’s a reason the existing PC1 is the least used form of protection: it usually just creates more work for...
Click to read more »-- "PC1" and "PC2", say -- and two printers. The Laser (B&W) printer is connected to PC2 via USB, and the new color printer is connected to PC1 in the...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »admin discretion is dangerous. DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC) PC1 on BLPs of high vandalism and on high edit warring pages, both where IPs...
Click to read more »visibility until reviewed (BR) existing article semi-protection (A) N/A PC1 protection (A) new article NPP, title blacklist list for review (EF, B, ORES)...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »inexperienced users simply do not understand that adding {{pp-move-indef}} or {{pp-pc1}} is only appropriate for pages which already have with an indefinite move...
Click to read more »This request has been declined. Please do not modify it. {{pp-pc1}} Nilesh Hindlekar Born (1986-03-03) 3 March 1986 (age 40) Mumbai, Maharashtra, India...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »worked (so there IS a problem with PSU1). Anyway what can be the problem with pc1, the working PSU2 dont work there, dont even turn on the fans. 201.78.196...
Click to read more »com/article.aspx?articleid=1234345 (211, 30, 3, 1) www.lin.ca/resource/html/arpa02/pc1-fertileobfuscation.pdf (211, 2, 1, 1) books.google.com/books?id=ilmgrec524uc...
Click to read more »bar of SP and PC1 isn't helpful, but FP can be overkill. PC2 seems a superior alternative to FP in these cases. I don't believe that PC1/PC2 make a lot...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »IP/new account edits a page can be semi-protected, and if there are then PC1 can be used. The backlog at Special:PendingChanges is never egregious, so...
Click to read more »Most of this seems to have been from IP editors, and semi-protection or PC1 protection might handle this. DES (talk) 16:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC) Notability...
Click to read more »Defending yourself against claims. I've semi-protected the article and added PC1. Indeffing socks with tags and closing. — Berean Hunter (talk) 21:19, 30...
Click to read more »pages already this. Some unprotections are successful; some failures. Some PC1 are successful; some failures. Same for PC2. I am unsure about how to use...
Click to read more »(Special:PendingChanges is usually empty, Special:StablePages lists just 434 PC1 pages, one PC2 page, and seven test pages), but given the hysterical, sky-is-falling-I-quit...
Click to read more »but also by increasing promoter activities of the prohormone convertases PC1/3 and PC2, essential for the activation of TRH from proTRH [4]." Thing is...
Click to read more »Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting an upgrade from PC1 to semi. Mark Arsten PC1-ed this article about a month ago but vandalism has continued...
Click to read more »was the way the trial was set up, and one of it's purposes was to see if PC1 was an effective subsitute for semi-protection. In some cases it's working...
Click to read more »pre-emptively, but due to past unhelpful contributions, the page is eligible for PC1, which I've enabled. Samsara 13:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Pending-changes...
Click to read more »that's why Protect -> Pending Changes -> "PC1: Review revisions from new and unregistered users" has a giant PC1 in front of it. From looking at your RFC...
Click to read more »20:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC) For an article of this amount of traffic, PC1 would be a far better starting point if one really believes in the risk,...
Click to read more »and semi-protected for a week, as the IP didn't seem to be bothered by the PC1. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 10:00, 1 August 2013 (UTC) reduce to semi-protection...
Click to read more »vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC) Declined PC1 already in place, only 1 IP with clear vandalism and that IP has been blocked...
Click to read more »See Defending yourself against claims. Blocked and tagged. Article set to PC1 for half a year. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Suspected sockpuppets...
Click to read more »account) if the Pending Changes policy was firmly such that it (at least in its PC1 form; I can see PC2 on article that would otherwise get full protection)...
Click to read more »Template:Pp-move-indef Template:Pp-move-vandalism Template:Pp-office Template:Pp-pc1 Template:Pp-semi Template:Pp-semi-indef Template:Pp-semi-protected...
Click to read more »editors due to its content, so imo it's either long term semi or long term PC1. I've set it to semi now - I think it qualifies. Samsara 00:51, 4 December...
Click to read more »Semi-protection: vandalism, Requested at WP:RFPP. Was indef semi'd prior to PC trial. PC1 not great here: too many edits. Restoring semi. using TW The Game (rapper)...
Click to read more »to Dawn.jpg talk - File:Passage to Dawn (first edition).jpg talk - File:PC1 TSR9254 Tall Tales Of The Wee Folk.jpg talk - File:PC2 TSR9255 Top Ballista...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »no reason why we couldn't restore it with indefinite semi-protection or PC1 protection.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 05:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC) Your...
Click to read more »(UTC) Indeffing sock and tagging. Also added 6 months semi-protection and PC1 indefinite. Closing. — Berean Hunter (talk) 21:40, 16 August 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »page will be automatically unprotected. followed by another 2 months of PC1. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism...
Click to read more »without engaging in discussion. Thomas.W talk 12:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC) Done PC1 for 2 weeks. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:10, 5 July...
Click to read more »Sro23 (talk) 01:49, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Done. Article is already under PC1, but I can upgrade it to semi-protection if this keeps up. NinjaRobotPirate...
Click to read more »claims. Blocking IPs one week. I've semi-protected a couple of articles as well as added PC1. Closing. — Berean Hunter (talk) 02:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »tutterMouse (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Done The OP is quite correct—PC1 is redundant if we have indefinite semi-protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for...
Click to read more »owner:Online 01:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Comment That was PC1 when it was semi I forgot PC1 was less then semi. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I...
Click to read more »March 2019 (UTC) 123Movies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) pp-pc1 This is an article about one of the world's largest illegal movies streaming...
Click to read more »October 2014 (UTC) I've semi-protected the article for one month, added PC1 and indeffed sock with tag. Closing. — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:38, 4 October...
Click to read more »I see a newcomer making useful contributions(usually when I'm patrolling PC1 backlog) with the "Welcome" button available, I use it. Also, I help out...
Click to read more »disruption in the area, but I much rather would've just seen massive use of PC1. IP editors should not be unable to edit entire content areas. A hypothetical...
Click to read more »semi should only be necessary for a few days, and then we can downgrade to pc1. — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:17, 14 January...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) There hasn't been a lot of disruptive editing yet - let's try PC1 first before reaching for bigger guns. Samsara 11:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to nl:Portforward (diff). Links: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/nl/4/43/Pc1-r1-internet.JPG. 2008-01-28 06:46:12: User pl:Hairspray Qeen (talk - contribs)...
Click to read more »vandalism – upgrade PC1 to semi due to consistent vandalism from IPs and non-confirmed. (Permanently?, temporarily in addition to PC1 so that PC1 goes back into...
Click to read more »there is a bug which removes all PC1 labelling if PC1 is disabled. So in case the semi is ever revoked, we leave the PC1 in place so that its record may...
Click to read more »after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Maile66 applied PC1 . Maile66 also added extended confirmed protection. I assume the extended...
Click to read more »vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC) Declined PC1 already in place, only 1 IP with clear vandalism and that IP has been blocked...
Click to read more »has low traffic and perhaps short-term PC1 will assist. If so and issue re-appears request longer period of PC1. , after which the page will be automatically...
Click to read more »setting PC1 has been someone trying to undo that protection (the March edit Iazges mentions). That's not a good edit. The article is only PC1 not semi...
Click to read more »automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC) Temporary PC1: Persistent IP vandalism on article with a low edit rate. Since December...
Click to read more »semi-protection: So that we have a page to demonstrate how PC1 is superseded by semi. (Make sure you leave PC1 when you add semi). Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:34, 6 September...
Click to read more »is semi 1 week, I'd prefer to keep the talk open with PC1, but if you feel semi is better than PC1 on talk so be it. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticebo...
Click to read more »Persistent vandalism – This is an infrequent vandalism target here, I think PC1 will do it here hmmm. :/. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 14:38,...
Click to read more »Protection: Page is PC1'd and EC'd. startTerminal (haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc) 01:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Done Removed PC1. Courcelles (talk)...
Click to read more »Persistent vandalism – Article about India's lower house of parliament. PC1 requested because of regular and frequent removal of content (allocation...
Click to read more »the event (15 April to 4 June). Request semi-protection until 5 June and PC1 for a period thereafter. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:03, 20 April 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Persistent vandalism – Regular ongoing IP vandalism. I'm requesting 3 months of PC1. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC) Pending-changes protected...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Request PC1 for this article for 3mo or more due to repeated socking, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »constructive edit. Ironically enough, one of the vandalisms was removing the {{pp-pc1}} template, which was done on December 11 but I only noticed now. Tercer...
Click to read more »3 September 2013 (UTC) Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Previous PC1 expired on 26 August, and problems resumed. Jackmcbarn (talk) 12:48, 3 September...
Click to read more »reasonable, and much of the vandalism is from autoconfirmed socks. Trying PC1 as an intermediate that will allow screening of IP. The sock hits a wide...
Click to read more »page, but I do remember it elsewhere. However, if we are only going with PC1 at this time... In determining the edit rate, only count edits that would...
Click to read more »unfortunate result. Certes (talk) 12:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC) Not done PC1 might be a more appropriate fix. PhantomTech (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2015...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »companies back in May) due to spamming. List of cryptocurrencies is now under PC1, something I think should be bumped to semi. MER-C 11:08, 9 February 2018...
Click to read more »only other recent ip editors have been reverted quickly. Perhaps applying PC1 to this page, or even a semi-prot until the vandal sees that he's locked...
Click to read more »1 January 1970}}</noinclude> {{pp|action=autoreview}} → {{pp-pc1|expiry=00:00 1 January 1970}} on template page: {{pp-semi}} →...
Click to read more »comment Binho24, the article is already protected. I also suggests that (pp-pc1) needs to remove because it is redudant if the article is semi-protected...
Click to read more »Pacific PR01 Pacific PR02 Parnelli VPJ4 Parnelli VPJ4B (redirect page) Penske PC1 Penske PC3 Penske PC4 Porsche 718 Porsche 787 Porsche 804 Prost JS45 Prost...
Click to read more »Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please change this from PC1 to semi auto-confirmed or semi-EC. We are spending too much time reverting...
Click to read more »the problem still exists, I am semi-protecting for one month and adding PC1 indef for articles. Talkpages, I will semi-prot for one week as needed and...
Click to read more »Reason: Counting 19 reverts in the last 2 weeks. Current pp level is pp-pc1 since 2014. May require additional protection for a short period of time...
Click to read more »and unconfirmed accounts, since about August 9. Note: Article is already PC1 protected, but semi-protection seems warranted again. --IJBall (contribs...
Click to read more »Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and newbie edits are not good at all, but PC1 is not working for now. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:43, 2...
Click to read more »(UTC) Temporary pending changes: Bergdahl was just released. We could use PC1 for the next week or so to stem the flood of drive-by editors. Chris Troutman...
Click to read more »semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption too high for PC1 to function properly. Kingerikthesecond (talk) 10:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »September 2017 (UTC) The frequency of edits here seems to me to confirm PC1 as the correct measure. Samsara 14:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC) Declined –...
Click to read more »and reverting. RGloucester — ☎ 03:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC) @RGloucester: is WP:PC1 a more feasible option? Deryck C. 07:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Pending-changes...
Click to read more »seem to have a problem, as this article encourages joke edits. 30 days of PC1 should solve the problem. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »giving it a week and relisting. GedUK 13:13, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Eh? PC1 automatically accepts autoconfirmed users' edits, unless there are some non-confirmed...
Click to read more »automatically unprotected. International School of Medicine Kyrgyzstan already had PC1, which I've removed as it is replaced by semi-protection. If this reoccurs...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Requesting PC1 pending-changes protection of this high-profile page, frequently subjected...
Click to read more »Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ⁓ Hello71 12:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Actually, PC1 might be alright too, although I really don't see any useful IP contribs...
Click to read more »Repeated IP vandalism. AldezD (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC) Declined PC1 seems to be doing its job, though I did bump out the expiry a while. Courcelles...
Click to read more »--Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Reducing to move=spp; edit=pc1. — xaosflux Talk 13:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk)...
Click to read more »You could ask for pending changes protection Wikipedia:Protection_policy#pc1 to be added at the wp:rfpp board.Govindaharihari (talk) 05:40, 31 July 2018...
Click to read more »pattern in IP vandalism, but I'd guess this is due to school kids. I'd like PC1 until July. Vandalism resumed as soon as the previous protection expired...
Click to read more »no reason why we couldn't restore it with indefinite semi-protection or PC1 protection.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 05:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC) Your...
Click to read more »owner:Online 01:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC) Semi-protected – 1 year. There was PC1 in place but it was about to expire. EdJohnston (talk) 05:13, 7 April 2016...
Click to read more »semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs just started disruption lately, but I think PC1 is still ineffective. . KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 02:09, 1...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. While Kww will typically downgrade PC2-protected articles to PC1 or semi-protection, in this case he increased the level of protection (to...
Click to read more »Sennecaster (Chat) 14:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC) Unprotected Seems like the PC1 has been there for long enough, removing. — xaosflux Talk 14:09, 22 September...
Click to read more »that as a starting point to find a citation and redo it correctly. I think PC1 is appropriate here. Guy Macon (talk) 02:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC) Declined –...
Click to read more »time? 13:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC) Persistent BLP vio's since his death. PC1 would also be an option. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:57, 27 August 2018...
Click to read more »given that this outbreak is ongoing, it seems like a good idea to make it PC1 to prevent collateral damage by denying IPs who could add important information...
Click to read more »O'Leary is a potential political candidate. I'd like to see one month of PC1 to allow discussion to reign over edit warring. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:06...
Click to read more »logs) @Anthony Appleyard: I'd like this page to be downgraded from semi to PC1, given that it was only protected three short times before being indefinitely...
Click to read more »from PC1 to semi or extended. The disruptive addition of unsourced name preference of the church by ip's is still a job to keep checking the PC1 edits...
Click to read more »fun - don't hesitate to call back then. The page is still on indefinite PC1. -- zzuuzz (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Indefinite semi-protection:...
Click to read more »changing info and reverting each other with no explanation or references. PC1 protection is not efficient for dealing with edit warring. Ivanvector (talk)...
Click to read more »makes it to the Main page before the 3-days are up, please remind me to lift pc1 (due to likely edit volume). El_C 21:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC) Lee Tae-yong (edit...
Click to read more »must agree, frustrating as it is on an article at AFD. Too frequent for PC1 to be a good candidate. --j⚛e deckertalk 18:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC) Semi-protection:...
Click to read more »Also, placed similar protections on other targeted articles and placed PC1 indefinitely requiring a review from now on. — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:16...
Click to read more »November 2015 (UTC) Declined The rate of incoming vandalism is low enough that PC1 isn't necessary, especially since there's nothing like major BLP concerns...
Click to read more »blanking and other WP:DE. And has been repeatedly protected. Giving indef pc1 a try. - jc37 07:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC) Doak Snead (edit | talk | history...
Click to read more »than a policy page itself. Or perhaps it could be changed from semi to WP:PC1 if there's still a concern. Thanks for your help. 64.40.54.80 (talk) 17:18...
Click to read more »copyvios resumed. So a longer Semi-prot is probably warranted, or maybe PC1 so as not to cut off Ip editors entirely, though admins should watch the...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC1 is not helping. TL22 (talk) 21:18, 18 June 2015 (UTC) Question: Why isn't...
Click to read more »22 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks. I've reverted some vandalism, and added some PC1 protection. Perhaps you could check it again in case there's anything I missed...
Click to read more »Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we consider changing from pc1 to perm semi, as busy as this article is, there's very little difference...
Click to read more »Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and addition of unsourced content. PC1 may be more appropriate than semi. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:28, 21 April...
Click to read more »General Ization Talk 20:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Done +3mo autoconfirmed, +1mo PC1. Nakon 04:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC) Eivind (edit | talk | history | links | watch...
Click to read more »semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article dropped from semi to PC1 about a week ago, and the vandalism picked right back up. The article has...
Click to read more »Various IPs have been making a slow-speed edit war over the timeline graphic. PC1 would remove the incentive from these IPs. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:14, 13...
Click to read more »official site URL is against WP:OUTING and page was fully protected, so PC1 would help prevent current disruption and these SPI (likely socks/disruptive...
Click to read more »Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Spending too much time with PC1, persistent IP warring over prefered information, see recent edit summaries...
Click to read more »| C) 15:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Already done by administrator Malcolmxl5.. PC1 applied for one month. P.S. I'm keeping a eye on this one. Malcolmxl5 (talk)...
Click to read more »mostly vandalized. --George Ho (talk) 17:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC) Declined, PC1 seems to be functioning correctly here Courcelles (talk) 17:47, 17 July 2017...
Click to read more »semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent content removal by troll. PC1 is active but still have to take time to review, semi for a few days would...
Click to read more »period of 3 days. , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC1 remains intact. N.J.A. | talk 13:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC) Kayamkulam Kochunni...
Click to read more »logs) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looking for a semiprot or PC1. Various IPs continue to change the codename from "NX" to "Project NX" against...
Click to read more »enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also currently under PC1 protection. Slon02 (talk) 19:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC) Jerome Udoji (edit...
Click to read more »article is a constant target for editors adding pictures of their own dogs. PC1 would allow the community to prevent these vanity editors without losing...
Click to read more »review the changes before they should be published live. Or to be exact: Pp-pc1 and Pp-move-indef. Ohrid is also one of the largest cities in North Macedonia...
Click to read more »Pending-changes protected. This isn't going to stop being a vandalism target. PC1 gives a better balance between allowing contribution and preventing vandalism...
Click to read more »protected Mark Arsten (talk) 06:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Unprotection: Remove PC1, as semi makes it redundant. Jackmcbarn (talk) 05:18, 23 December 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »well as User:Moxy; however, I believe based on my understanding of it, that PC1 protection may be enough to protect this user's slightly more sensitive nature...
Click to read more »168.1.100' where 192.168.1.100 is the IP address you got with ipconfig on PC1. If you have a router, see if you have anything in the router with 'netbios'...
Click to read more »bristlecone pine series, which dominate the PC1 and impart the characteristic hockey stick shape to the PC1 and thereafter to the final temperature reconstruction...
Click to read more »important policies (though I would also be OK with putting all BLPs under PC1 rather than semi-protection as a compromise). IntoThinAir (talk) 15:33, 2...
Click to read more »DeVito Samsara 2017-11-19 Persistent disruptive editing: long term target, PC1 was not effective; via RfPP Ludacris Samsara 2017-11-19 Persistent disruptive...
Click to read more »disruption in the area, but I much rather would've just seen massive use of PC1. IP editors should not be unable to edit entire content areas. A hypothetical...
Click to read more »suitable as it's going to be (which, sadly, it is). Merge is its own result. WP:PC1 does say "administrators may apply temporary pending changes protection on...
Click to read more »the word Drenica in their usernames. Lastly, all three have created pages (pc1, pc2, pc3) about incidents that occurred in Prekaz, Kosovo. Namely: Sockmaster...
Click to read more »thus far, the article needs to be watched. Maybe an admin should consider PC1 protection. If it's ever implemented, maybe even PC2. But for now, I think...
Click to read more »September 2013 (UTC) So your solution involves placing every article under PC1 protection? That sounds like a cure that's at least as bad as the disease...
Click to read more »Samsara 20190208051838 20240208051836 Persistent [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]]: PC1 does not deter sufficiently and there's too much activity; targeted constantly...
Click to read more »Effects of (edit) protection and pending changes combinations PC off PC1 (auto-accept autoconfirmed) Proposed PC2 (auto-accept extendedconfirmed) Current...
Click to read more »Persistent vandalism Kaley Cuoco Callanecc 2015-12-02 Persistent vandalism: PC1 isn't making it any better given the large number of reverts so changing...
Click to read more »PC1%26_phstart%3DsuccessSource%26usePUBJs%3Dtrue%26rhSource%3D5186&treeid=&personid=&hintid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=dPC1...
Click to read more »2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2018 (UTC) Semi-protected + PC1. One account that made its first edit was created in 2012. — Berean Hunter...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »(Interim) RfC 2011 (Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3) RfC 2012 (Sept Oct Nov) RfC 2013 RfC 2014 RfC 2016 (DC) RfC 2016 (PC2) RfC 2016 (PC1+) Poll 2017 (Remove PC2)...
Click to read more »interest. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Set protection to PC1 for a month. Guy (Help!) 17:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC) A bit of an overreaction...
Click to read more »(Current emblem of FC Barcelona) 03:29, 4 Aug 2004 Matt Crypto uploaded "DES-pc1.png" ((Somewhat nasty, but I had them knocking about) Illustration of a DES...
Click to read more »characters Anachronist 2021-01-24 Persistent disruptive editing: Clearly PC1 is not helping Moon landing Materialscientist 2021-01-24 Persistent vandalism...
Click to read more »John_Green_(author) (talk · hist) Samsara 20171208042446 frequency too high for PC1 1009 John_H._Jackson_Moot_Court_Competition (talk · hist) Anachronist 20190504111052...
Click to read more »edit warring Olivia Holt Kww 2013-08-03 nothing by anons being accepted, PC1 a waste of time Creampie (sexual act) WereSpielChequers 2013-08-05 Violations...
Click to read more »enforcement Image editing MER-C 2020-01-05 Persistent spamming: continues despite PC1, bumping to semi List of Arabic given names DragonflySixtyseven 2020-01-06...
Click to read more »Slot machine MER-C 2022-11-27 Persistent spamming: spam continues despite PC1 2022 COVID-19 protests in China Mushroom Materialscientist 2022-11-28 Persistent...
Click to read more »language in England (e|t|h|li|w|lo) Done Eminem (e|t|h|li|w|lo) Done PC1 found to be inappropriate due to levels of vandalism involving WP:BLP issues...
Click to read more »[74] (23698) 1997 NA3 (talk · edit · history) 362 1 0 N [75] (23701) 1997 PC1 (talk · edit · history) 364 1 0 N [76] (23704) 1997 SD10 (talk · edit · history)...
Click to read more »Persistent disruptive editing Sports betting MER-C 2023-06-27 increase to semi, PC1 hasn't stopped the spamming Miss USA 2023 Courcelles 2023-06-28 Community...
Click to read more »operative). In April 2025 they created Rus Thompson pre-populated with {{pp-pc1}} and maintenance banners dated to 2019. Support LLMPRV either way....
Click to read more »"outdated" and will not engage at talk pages. Request is for at least pp-pc1, preferably higher. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC) Declined –...
Click to read more »isaacl (talk) 22:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC) It is assuming that we can have PC1 where only reviewers can approve edits and PCECP where only extended confirmed...
Click to read more »agreed that we need to do something? Maybe semi for the biggest problems and PC1 for the rest? We could try it out for the rest of the year and see how much...
Click to read more »sets of flaggedrevs criteria, and the only one that currently exists is PC1 (Review revisions from new and unregistered users). How do I create other...
Click to read more »User:That'sHedley, and definitely others), it becomes nearly impossible for me and other PC1 reviewers to maintain the good stuff while getting rid of the bad stuff....
Click to read more »could read Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Pending_Changes_expansion_RfC#B:_PC1_protection_for_recognized,_vital,_and_BLP_articles especially the oppose...
Click to read more »2022, appears to have been made by a PC1 reviewer and is the most recent revert of any kind at this article. PC1 is doing nothing but serving as an obstacle...
Click to read more »Semi-protected indefinitely. Since there's no point in having both semi and PC1 (since non-autoconfirmed editors weren't allowed to edit under the former)...
Click to read more »"change protection" button, which gave me a page like this one saying that "PC1: Review revisions from new and unregistered users" was set to "infinite"...
Click to read more »editor's insertion of a lie.) Semiprotection would just automatically do what PC1 patrollers already do by hand several times a week. CityOfSilver 22:30, 3...
Click to read more »over the last seven months shows semiprotection will just automate what PC1 reviewers are now doing by hand. CityOfSilver 20:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC) Semi-protected...
Click to read more »disruption were to resume after unprotection, implementing Pending Changes (PC1) could then be considered as a more balanced alternative to a full lock....
Click to read more »