Redirect to:
article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:CITEKILLWP:CITEKILL WP:OVERCITEWP:OVERCITE WP:OVERKILLWP:OVERKILL...
Click to read more »just use ref#24 once at the end of the second paragraph per WP:OVERCITE More WP:OVERCITE in "composition" section- after ref#31, just use ref#29 once at...
Click to read more »number of articles about women): Darthvader2 - $30 due to an unintended overcite from the Spanish Wikipedia jury, most of the articles from this user were...
Click to read more »issue, at least. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:19, 20 June 2015 (UTC) Fixed overcite issue, took out IMDB link, italicization issue wasn't there. A21sauce (talk)...
Click to read more »and add nothing of value for readers seeking information and not masses of evidence to show good or evil in their required light. WP:OVERCITE WP:PIECE...
Click to read more »performances More WP:OVERCITE, just use ref#80 at the end of the "'Don't Stop the Music' and 'Umbrella'" bit. Re-issue and remix album More WP:OVERCITE, ref#124 should...
Click to read more »with pull quotes before the subject is introduced in prose; a degree of overcite, other citation needed, and a number of overly short subsections (also...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable musician with a WP:OVERCITE for references. Fail of WP:GNG and WP:NSINGER. nearlyevil665 06:13, 1 May...
Click to read more »reliable sources that confer notability and appears to be a case of WP:OVERCITE. DrStrauss talk 14:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »service.[54][55][56][57][58]" Is five citations really necessary? While WP:OVERCITE is an essay, many reviewers wil question five citations in a row. Views...
Click to read more »Taking a quick look through the article, I think some parts suffer from WP:OVERCITE, such as the "gameplay" section. Like, does the fact that it's a 2D platformer...
Click to read more »(UTC) Support An engaging read, and an excellent example of how not to overcite an article. I liked your use of boxes for LG citations when I read it a...
Click to read more »provides little information that is non-promotional, and engages in WP:OVERCITE to link to promotional sources. Bakazaka (talk) 21:11, 5 September 2018...
Click to read more »citation I would like to know where because I think that I do tend to overcite and err on the side of caution, I don't want claims that should have citations...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:OVERCITE. References to blogs, lyric websites and primary sources. Nothing to suggest...
Click to read more »history." Although you overcite the lead, you leave this assertion which needs desperate backing from sources uncited. About the overciting issue, have in mind...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) As I said in Tenacious D's review above, you do not have to overcite in the lead. Especially obvious facts (is a Japanese singer-songwriter...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable medical professional, WP:OVERCITE with no apparent pass of WP:GNG. H-index on Google Scholar far from impressive...
Click to read more »the advertising slogan[24] "Not flash, just Gordon".[25][26][27][28]: WP:OVERCITE WP:EARWIG shows no copyright violations. User:Headbomb/unreliable marks...
Click to read more »it's possible to remove some/all of them. There are some instances of WP:OVERCITE throughout the article. See if its possible to trim the excessive citations...
Click to read more »10 more citations doesn't change the article or its notability. See WP:OVERCITE. "... thought to be an autobiography of Henry Avery ..." — If it's an autobiography...
Click to read more »row? Consider removing the extra footnotes in the spirit of WP:OVERCITE (although OVERCITE is an essay so this change will not influence my support) I tend...
Click to read more »because of citation issues, specifically unsourced content, page needed, and overcite issues. (t · c) buidhe 16:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC) Move to FARC no significant...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Winner and nominee of non-notable music awards. WP:OVERCITE with interviews, blogs and other non-reliable secondary sources. Nearlyevil665...
Click to read more »August 2016 (UTC) Delete -- a micro-stub of an article with a case of WP:Overcite: "American telecommunications executive. At Nokia, she oversaw new product...
Click to read more »they are lumped in with other more reliable sources which points to WP:OVERCITE and WP:INTEGRITY issues. Vladimir.copic (talk) 04:00, 8 September 2025...
Click to read more »August 2007 (UTC) Support I still think it is overcited; however given the option between an overcited article and an undercited one, I suppose this is...
Click to read more »some that seems to have too many citations, such as Sally Sitou (see WP:OVERCITE). As a general rule, more than 3 citations is usually too many In my personal...
Click to read more »and take some ideas on board. The 'Early life' section falls foul of WP:OVERCITE. Why is "He is of Irish descent" and "was brought up as a Roman Catholic"...
Click to read more »now, the article itself fails WP:NOTHOWTO as essentially a recipe with overcite from some non-RSes and passing mentions. This article probably counts as...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:17, 7 December 2019 (UTC) Definitely less promotional. Has WP:OVERCITE issues now, however. This doesn't change what appears to be a lack of notability...
Click to read more »citated/referenced the page "Raymond Sandover" Hi Mabbs001 - No you haven't overcited. Usually two citations will suffice as a max (unless the assertion in...
Click to read more »coverage. This should be a selective merge, with regard to WP:UNDUE and WP:OVERCITE. There's a suggestion here to skip the normal redirect after the merge...
Click to read more »(I have to imagine people disputed its level of acclaim?) While WP:OVERCITE is "just an essay", it's a fairly accepted one, and WP:CITEBUNDLE strongly...
Click to read more »there in 1928, when Kneale was six years old.[6]" An advice: Try not to overcite your sentences. Place inline citations at the end of the sentences, and...
Click to read more »Rock") should only be used at the end of the second paragraph per WP:OVERCITE. WP:OVERCITE also says to have an inline citation for "all direct quotations...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable per WP:CREATIVE and the article is WP:OVERCITE for a WP:BLP1E that too not a notable work. Its more of a WP:PROMOTION...
Click to read more »tweet. I will not oppose based on Overciting, but I do recommend that another look is taken for this. WP:OVERCITE is a good essay to read on this topic...
Click to read more »a duet with Selena. I'll remove if its still trivia There's a lot of overciting throughout the article. Take the first paragraph of the Early 1994-1995...
Click to read more »it's possible that this is notable, but it's more likely that it's being overcited by fans. Jergling (talk) 21:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC) Delete since this...
Click to read more »why every sentence would need a citation. That would seem to be more WP:OVERCITE at this point. Thanks for your input. Neovu79 (talk) 00:41, 24 February...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per CBL's cites, two of which (WP:OVERCITE) are now added to the article; Seems sufficient per WP:GNG's "significant...
Click to read more »improvements & new sourcing. However, the last sentences has a bad case of overcite. Perhaps it could be corrected, by moving some refs into Further reading...
Click to read more »19:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC) Delete - no credible claim of notability, and WP:OVERCITE applies; if you look at the citations, most of them turn out to be cruft...
Click to read more »him in RS. Also given it is a work of WP:SPA the deliberate attempt of overciting is clearly attempt to create fake WP:SIGCOV, example citing baseball-reference...
Click to read more »to pick which ones to include in the article without introducing a WP:OVERCITE problem -- not a normal issue for a WP:BLP that doesn't meet WP:BASIC....
Click to read more »Comment/Question, how can a 300 word article have over 50 references, a case of WP:OVERCITE? Coolabahapple (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC) You are correct, but...
Click to read more »that two sentences in a row have the same citation. It will be WP:OVERCITE. Overcite does not apply to quotations. Each quotation needs a citation at the...
Click to read more »good.[6] A balancing statement to the effect that it's quite possible to overcite might be added to this advice.[7] Tony (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of his career.". Ironically, however, for the most part the article is overcited, with a sea of distracting blue footnotes! I believe this reassessment...
Click to read more »but needs an ambitious editor to cleanup the machine gun prose. See WP:OVERCITE Lightburst (talk) 00:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »"Scotland's universities are complemented" is not supported by the ref. There is overcite in some cases, see cleanup tags on the article. The coverage in some areas...
Click to read more »match its proportion in the total literature, with some exceptions (we overcite molecular biology and epidemics papers relative to their proportion in...
Click to read more »of the issues raised included confusing prose, strange phrasing, and overciting. I'd like help with fixing these and seeing what other things I can do...
Click to read more »famous gospel musician and artist in Africa. WP:FANPAGE or WP:COI Lots of overciting, from what appears to mostly be store pages. Ethanpet113 (talk) 10:39...
Click to read more »references, but they are in total 156, should I put them? I do not want to overcite. Jaespinoza (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC) You might provide a general...
Click to read more »Tools [17] and [18] are the same edits and a clearcut case of Khoa's overciting on rivalry articles. [19] from earlier this year also shows a similar...
Click to read more »Maile (talk) 00:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC) There also seem to a slight overcite for the MoH and the DSC do they really need three cites each? Jim Sweeney...
Click to read more »WP:OVERCITE, just use ref#57 (E!) at the end of the second-to-last sentence. There are only two sources there, and that does not violate WP:OVERCITE. Gloss • talk...
Click to read more »references per entry really necessary for the Manned Apollo missions table? (WP:OVERCITE) Names in the Cancelled missions table need to sort by last name per WP:NAMESORT...
Click to read more »prose issues, very poor image layout, and MoS cleanup needed. The lead is overcited and images may need review. The bottom of the article has taken on some...
Click to read more »20:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC) Comment: This appears to be a case of wp:overcite: could the citations be consolidated, or at least put to the end of the...
Click to read more »~~~~10Eleventeen 20:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Weak keep - I'm not thrilled with the WP:OVERCITE, but the two films he has directed have media coverage, and so he barely...
Click to read more »advertising. Moved to mainspace too early without review. Also suffers from WP:OVERCITE and WP:SOLUTION - RichT|C|E-Mail 00:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »national campaigns? I just deleted a lot of inline references, on the WP:OVERCITE principle. There seemed to be an element of WP:MASK given the number of...
Click to read more »their activity as a single purpose account. This follows a pattern of overciting WP:TOOSOON that was also echoed by SPAs in the original AfD [1] that also...
Click to read more »the majority of sources seem to have COI themselves. There are a lot (overciting?), but the fact that everything I have checked does not pass muster makes...
Click to read more »references in print and blogs. There's a lot of rather unattractive WP:OVERCITE going on in the article, and the article was evidently written by Duncan...
Click to read more »"significant published secondary sources". WP:OVERCITE is an essay, not a policy or guideline. Also, WP:OVERCITE does not apply, as each performance has only...
Click to read more »WP:OVERCITE suggests possible WP:COI. DrStrauss talk 12:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC) DrStrauss can you advise on the new editing addressing the WP:OVERCITE?----...
Click to read more »this topic. jps (talk) 20:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC) You need to read wp:overcite, its quality not quantity that matters, and blogs are not RS.Slatersteven...
Click to read more »as a Gentoo package) which are egregiously trivial in nature. Note WP:OVERCITE Power~enwiki (talk) 06:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC) I'm not sure the pure number...
Click to read more »sums that up. .[47][56][65][66][67] I'm just a little concerned with WP:OVERCITE, but I suppose that's to support the sentence that many critics did appreciate...
Click to read more »now I'd recommend citing every cite-able bit of text, even if it means overciting (excessive cites can be removed at a later stage). For example, the last...
Click to read more »cover 1 week each. I can place 150 refs in the merged list, but is that overciting? Jaespinoza (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »per sentence now. I have a bad sense about overciting, so I'll be happy to remove any other cases of overciting in the lead. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ]...
Click to read more »18:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC) Delete I concur with the nominator; it is overcited with sources that are difficult to verify, has no assumed notability per...
Click to read more »have been removed. It appears the article's main issues was actually overciting. Many recipients of awards had two or three references when they only...
Click to read more »that match is the only thing that does pattern matching. Done Bit of WP:OVERCITE here. You don't need two references for the fact that // marks a comment...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) There are various sources but the overciting and writing style look promotional. And I am not sure if the sources are...
Click to read more »interest. Msnicki (talk) 00:36, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Delete Overwritten/overcited and UNDUE on a minor and only proposed massage parlour is not what this...
Click to read more »48, 51. This article relies heavily on a few sources. In places it is overcited. Getting the ref name upto cu is some sort of record. In some paragraphs...
Click to read more »same thing, so in this case, quantity isn't better than quality. See WP:OVERCITE and WP:GNG. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 20:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC) Ok thanks...
Click to read more »will encounter a lot of resistance. I would recommend expanding out the overcites from the lead into the body and writing the statements more ambiguously...
Click to read more »TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Pop art section seems overcited. Are these facts so controversial and likely to be disputed that every...
Click to read more »I didn't tag everything. While not every sentence needs a citation (WP:OVERCITE), every paragraph does need at least one reference except for lead sections...
Click to read more »state). -- Tavix (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Retarget to Template:Overcite. -- Tavix (talk) 18:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Oh, guess we do have a CITEKILL...
Click to read more »quick look because this popped up on my watchlist, and I noticed a lot of overciting. If a source is used for more than one sentence in a row, only add the...
Click to read more »and should have been sourced by a single ref. Instead it has a 9 ref WP:OVERCITE, solely to pack in worthless redundant refs. (1)2021 NTC FM Stations" (PDF)...
Click to read more »having more than 15 sources or are you sure you are not reaching towards overciting here? In the case of the reception having a theme, how does the level...
Click to read more »for a POV fight?Trevdna (talk) 19:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC) Actually, the overcite is a result of the POV wars.. Those have died down significantly, and I'd...
Click to read more »moved to be placed after the sentence that it is verifying, to avoid WP:OVERCITE. "To expand his horizons as an actor," expand his horizons feels a little...
Click to read more »aircraft.[9][12][13] You've got three citations for a single sentence (WP:OVERCITE). The last one covers everything so the first two are just clutter. Why...
Click to read more »14:44, 12 January 2020 (UTC) Commment has the hallmarks of paid editing: overciting, promotional tone and the 37 references cited in an earlier version collapsed...
Click to read more »excellent filmographies one could are argue that they are ridiculously overcited.--Kmhkmh (talk) 14:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC) Well, that was a joke. Hafspajen...
Click to read more »under WP:SINGER specifically and WP:BIO more broadly. Article is also overcited to make an appearance of being well-sourced. There are no English-language...
Click to read more »column. Why? Every match result is provided in ref #3; I see no need to WP:OVERCITE?? Harrias talk 10:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC) Well, we usually reference...
Click to read more »reliable sources (almost 40). You don't necessarily need to have 40 (avoid OVERCITE), but you should have enough that indicate notability. I should also note...
Click to read more »not just what the band's members say of themselves would be fine. The overciting, as I mentioned above, gets a bit tiring sometimes, and the prose is obviously...
Click to read more »a living person must strictly abide by this guideline. Be mindful of overciting and balancing redundant citations in lead sections or infoboxes. For a...
Click to read more »WP:LINKSPAM to Wikipedia articles, in most cases adding it as gratuitous WP:OVERCITING to articles that already had proper RS cites to support Jewish heritage...
Click to read more »don't demonstrate notability, and clutter up the source section, per WP:OVERCITE. You need to include what others write about him. Has anyone written about...
Click to read more »references per entry really necessary for the Manned Apollo missions table? (WP:OVERCITE) Names in the Cancelled missions table need to sort by last name per WP:NAMESORT...
Click to read more »Finance link [[2]] which is dead may have been PR. I deleted it per WP:OVERCITE. Much easier to fix than nominating and deleting. You can see from time...
Click to read more »add it at the end of the sentence block instead. I do have a tendency to overcite, but if you don't mind, I'd rather wait until I'm a bit more comfortable...
Click to read more »have fixed some instances, not sure that I fixed all) and some of the overcite instances, I believe I addressed nearly all the concerns you listed (and...
Click to read more »column. Why? Every match result is provided in ref #3; I see no need to WP:OVERCITE?? Harrias talk 10:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC) Well, we usually reference...
Click to read more »WP:OVERCITE. By developing and launching a bot that would show a warning notice for editors trying to submit a draft article triggering WP:OVERCITE filters...
Click to read more »review. Thanks, Sa Ga Vaj 08:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC) Please fix the WP:OVERCITE problem in the Deccan_Chargers_in_2009#Awards section. --DBigXrayᗙ 08:39...
Click to read more »definition of WP:GNG with significant indepth coverage. It violates WP:OVERCITE but at least the article shows the sources. Cleanup after keep could involve...
Click to read more »self - COME BACK TO THIS Chidgk1 (talk) 08:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC) overcite: In 2019 ratification of the Kigali amendment to the Montreal Protocol...
Click to read more »14:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC) Leads are summaries and as such this is overcited. Some refs need format work, prose weak, sentences/paragraphs choppy....
Click to read more »together. By the way, this advice is coming from someone with a tendency to overcite, so I can understand the compulsion to make sure that everything is verifiable...
Click to read more »over-long semi-guideline to make the point. Wikipedia has become insanely overcited. Nowhere else in scholarship, or the internet generally, is the little...
Click to read more »15 August 2007 (UTC) The first paragraph of the main body is clearly overcited. If any of the general references listed at the bottom of the article...
Click to read more »coauthors it, is useless for notability. You have unsourced claims, an overcited claim, and two sources which evidently don't verify the sentence they're...
Click to read more »than one source given for them. I can give more sources but don't want to overcite it. Anyway, if any content dispute we can discuss it at talk page of article...
Click to read more »(or vandals). If it is really felt that all five are necessary, then WP:OVERCITE would encourage bundling them: there's a big readability trade-off to having...
Click to read more »thumb over there of at least one citation per paragraph. It is better to overcite than undercite - then you don't get into any tiffs with the reviewers....
Click to read more »present throughout the article, these need to be taken care of. Ton of WP:OVERCITE throughout, some of these claims have 5-6 citations after (peaking at 8)...
Click to read more »[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]" in relationship to WP:BOMBARDMENT and WP:OVERCITE as a means of masking notability through run-of-the-mill and routine coverage...
Click to read more »This is a really good article! One advice I would give is to avoid WP:OVERCITING and distill down the amount of citations made to uncontroversial statements...
Click to read more »email) 01:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC) @John M Wolfson:, yes, the lead is overcited, but more importantly, it is choppy and unpleasant to read. Here is the...
Click to read more »defences. I agree with the above, just a couple of times facts appear to be overcited - though could you find a cite or two for the last two paragraphs in Would...
Click to read more »January 2020 (UTC) Weak Delete Lots of sourcing, but looks like classic overcite.Slatersteven (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »18:51, 3 November 2022 User WP:OWN reverting others' attempts to reduce WP:OVERCITE or otherwise helpfully improve article (while calling it all "vandalism"):...
Click to read more »Frank Oz, which is supported by ref17. I did it this way to prevent WP:OVERCITE. If you like, I could include citations after each entry. The empty spaces...
Click to read more »although these were removed by the AfD nominator as he reported them as overciting (which was a new concept to me, anyway). That's all I want to say. I am...
Click to read more »they're published in. The reviewers are also noting that this draft is overcited in spots. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:51, 6 October 2022...
Click to read more »having done any cleanup, [28] and removing {{unreliable source}} and {{overcite}} without fixing either.[29] Any posting of a user warning template or...
Click to read more »in the prose makes the material hard to read. I suggest consulting WP:OVERCITE (specifically WP:REPCITE) which, although is an essay, explains my concerns...
Click to read more »statement had already been properly sourced so this may very well be WP:OVERCITE too. Action 3: Then, the user removed the first two reliable sources (A...
Click to read more »as an overcited article. In this case, when put under expert review by people who know good articles the article was not considered overcited. However...
Click to read more »government sources aren't even required to satisfy WP:V, but I preferred to overcite as opposed to not having enough sources. In short, I wrote most of the...
Click to read more »present company] are going to remove the obvious if it isn't cited, I'll overcite while I've got the source in front of me" and went on to say his real beef...
Click to read more »front, just the first sentence has seventeen citations. That is extreme WP:OVERCITE and a perfect example of in-article conflict. If you have five reliable...
Click to read more »then the article should be longer. Otherwise, looks like a case of an overcite and makes the company look non-notable." K.e.coffman (talk) 04:54, 7 August...
Click to read more »part of a proper source review. I don't like having to ref stuff and WP:OVERCITE, but will add more if that's what it takes to close this. TechnoTalk (talk)...
Click to read more »usually curative." All too often, this is not true.) The article may appear overcited, but moving Controversy to its own article will leave a much more manageably...
Click to read more »songcraft.[120]" Suggest you review WP:BUNDLING and read the essay WP:OVERCITE, and then work on reducing problem areas like this (13 citations in two...
Click to read more »the topic say it's overcited, I defer to them. I don't know what is common knowledge vs. not in the field. When I think of overcited, I think of those...
Click to read more »up in the recent changes list. You removed refs and cited WP:Overcite; But WP:Overcite states that you have to discuss certain removals on the article's...
Click to read more »Having citations after every single sentence is cumbersome and is WP:OVERCITE. -- ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 12:16, 14 July 2012 (UTC) "Some historians" - weasel...
Click to read more »contained below 4)As I have previously stated, these three authors are overcited. Nearly 38% of the article is based on them. New accounts of SRA, such...
Click to read more »be ok in this case, dat's fine. I am concerned about this element of "overciting," which goes on to create a size problem. But its not something which...
Click to read more »places where the opposite it true - there are a couple of instances of overcite/refbombs. Those should be cleaned up, either removing sources that are...
Click to read more »The quality of Wikipedia improves when each statement is cited; our material is required to be verifiable with reliable sources as is covered in the W...
Click to read more »doing a WP:BEFORE check; given their minimal coverage, this smacks of WP:OVERCITE.Yunshui 雲水 09:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Many sources (whether citeable or...
Click to read more »section on the IP's talk page, consisting only of "Here is what I mean about OVERCITE," plus a signature. That is obviously not a warning for edit warring, and...
Click to read more »page details exactly why it is a poor source, and redundant also per WP:OVERCITE, WP:BOMBARD" 00:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC) "poor source by non-notable...
Click to read more »accomplishments: 11:26, 29 September 2022 Talk page section where consensus about WP:OVERCITE was established: see here Diffs of the user reverting against consensus:...
Click to read more »a member of class 42-G). I could see an argument that the sentence is overcited, but it's not totally obvious - e.g. if the first three (web) sources...
Click to read more »citations attached to them, respectively. This seems like a case of WP:OVERCITE honestly. Too add yet another citation seem only to make the situation...
Click to read more »article measurably worse - the article lede, for example, is a mess of WP:OVERCITE now, because Magoo has taken an everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approach...
Click to read more »Frank Oz, which is supported by ref17. I did it this way to prevent WP:OVERCITE. If you like, I could include citations after each entry. The empty spaces...
Click to read more »process. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC) Bad case of Overcite. Please learn (and tell all your friends): One cite per statement – find...
Click to read more »a place name and "plural Birgstuz'n" introduced here, resulting in WP:OVERCITE x 5. The Tatzelwurm is about some dragon of legend. I did not really bother...
Click to read more »sums that up. .[47][56][65][66][67] I'm just a little concerned with WP:OVERCITE, but I suppose that's to support the sentence that many critics did appreciate...
Click to read more »technology */ removed weasel words. update, wording, sorting, wikilinks, WP:OVERCITE" 07:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 762702985 by Debresser (talk)...
Click to read more »misunderstanding regarding references' convention, also bringing in Wikipolicy (overciting). The link being added doesn't provide any support to the text and is...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Right now all the user is doing is aggravting other users by overciting policy. --Deskana talk 19:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC) I would tend to think...
Click to read more »cover 1 week each. I can place 150 refs in the merged list, but is that overciting? Jaespinoza (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comments -SidewinderX (talk) I see a lot of source-vomit. See WP:OVERCITE. In general, you don't need to use multiple sources to cite a non-controversial...
Click to read more »added to the article if there is demand, but I'd recommend to avoid WP:OVERCITE. I remain convinced 20-20-20 is notable. Are there any reasonable concerns...
Click to read more »battles and exploits." Please see Casemate's blog. Separately, please see WP:Overcite and Extraordinary claims sections for additional discussion on sources...
Click to read more »instrumentals" Rephrased. J Milburn (talk) 14:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC) Per WP:OVERCITE, a ref shouldn't be used more than once in a row per paragraph (refs#1...
Click to read more »User:PoWaiFung has been continuously overciting on List of Running Man episodes (2021). I have previously informed user to not overcite in March 2021, April 2021...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) @Weegeerunner:: Isn't this kind of edits a POV-pushing? WP:OVERCITE doesn't make sth. NPOV, am I wrong? Actually, aren't all M.Bitton's edits...
Click to read more »shows how much work it was to try to convince Loves_Woolf1882 about WP:OVERCITE and WP:SYNTH. The current compromise on one issue is that we have: "Awol...
Click to read more »at many of the citations - in part because the article is suspiciously overcited. The National Law Journal and Law360 coverage falls squarely within WP:ROUTINE:...
Click to read more »the 3rd paragraph. Personally, I think that citing both statements is WP:OVERCITE, but I can do it you want. Thanks, I appreciate the helpful feedback, as...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:31, 22 October 2019 (UTC) This list definitely suffers from WP:OVERCITE as references 1 and 6 are used more than four times, which is more times...
Click to read more »an edit conflict. Once he sees where I'm going, that I am not overciting for overciting's sake, that I am addressing the deletion, he lets it stand. So...
Click to read more »article measurably worse - the article lede, for example, is a mess of WP:OVERCITE now, because Magoo has taken an everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approach...
Click to read more »everyone else to see for themselves and weigh in (i.e. I did not revert WP:OVERCITE, though that is in my opinion a good reason to revert). — Shibbolethink...
Click to read more »Gerard (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC) There is even a tactic called wp:overcite which partially relies on this, the idea if its sourced it must be OK.Slatersteven...
Click to read more »the same content Valjean had removed, while adding 10 more citations, OVERCITE) "it's important to include how detached from reality her opinions are...
Click to read more »deletion/Rape jihad (2nd nomination) I mentioned the Rotherham words as overcite (but was thinking is it necessary?), intro could be rewritten "Rape Jihad...
Click to read more »edit by Meng that condensed several citations to the same source, per WP:OVERCITE. Then, they mentioned out of the blue that they reverted one of your edits...
Click to read more »more time... nah I'm not gonna be childish :-) That was an unnecessary overcite in the lead that I removed. I stand by that edit. Levivich [dubious – discuss]...
Click to read more »edit by Meng that condensed several citations to the same source, per WP:OVERCITE. Then, they mentioned out of the blue that they reverted one of your edits...
Click to read more »frequently disputing reliable sources on talk page, some people resort to overciting and it happened here as well. What kind of resolution do you have in your...
Click to read more »requirements, how uncited content should be handled and what constitutes overcite. These diffs do not show me referring to anyone as “dishonest, ignorant...
Click to read more »sure how much to restore or how best to do it. Maybe it was somewhat overcited before but the references seem valid and the removal seems overdone. Maybe...
Click to read more »the lead that seem to be an improvement, including the removal of those overcites as well as small pieces of other redundant information. This is how WP:BRD...
Click to read more »workers commute." For this example in particular, this is a case of WP:OVERCITE, given that the town is geographically close to the Ben Gurion airport...
Click to read more »trying to disprove Zaptain United (talk) 19:57, 5 December 2025 (UTC) WP:OVERCITE#Reprints. 11WB (talk) 19:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC) Keep, what Blox said...
Click to read more »actual content. The article as it stands still has multiple issues of WP:OVERCITE, source misrepresentation, biased content etc. My contributions at the...
Click to read more »future, please be aware of footnote placement per WP:FN. The article is overcited to the point that it violates WP:NOT and looks like a blog or webpage...
Click to read more »moved to be placed after the sentence that it is verifying, to avoid WP:OVERCITE. "To expand his horizons as an actor," expand his horizons feels a little...
Click to read more »WP:NOTMEMORIAL, WP:NPOV, repeated use of deprecated sources and reckless overcite that is tantamount to WP:BLUDGEON. It appears that this article has been...
Click to read more »what do other people say about him? Additionally I noticed you are WP:OVERCITING in your draft random words, that link to WP:DISAMBIGUATION articles instead...
Click to read more »include a citation only at the end of the last sentence so as to avoid overciting, so some sentences may appear unsourced but in fact that is not the case...
Click to read more »(Czech) I just added a single citation on a one-source sentence to avoid WP:OVERCITE (this is kind of a subject matter extraction of his visual history so is...
Click to read more »Heartfox above, who thought that the footnotes and chart listings were overcited. The first instance of each chart-listing mention has a citation. So they...
Click to read more »rhetoric. Thus the large number of citations are really examples of WP:OVERCITE yet they fail to support the lead in showing that it is relevant to have...
Click to read more »one dubious source and a lot of primary sources. I also see a degree of overcite here as well. I suggest nuking and starting from scratch, leaving out all...
Click to read more »emails, maybe, but then there's fair use to consider... copyright is so overcited on this website). "Option 5" is right on: public communications are public...
Click to read more »each statement in the notes column, but was unsure whether this would be overciting since all of them are one click away from the link in the home run count...
Click to read more »span}} {{Citekill}}, {{Ck}}, {{Overref}}, {{Overcited}}, {{Citation overkill}}, {{Over-cite}}, {{Overcite}}, {{Over-citation}}, {{Over cite}}, {{Refbomb}}...
Click to read more »(UTC) ——— Background In the first paragraph, the repetition of FN2 is overciting. Removed. Dan56 (talk) 00:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC) "their style of rock and...
Click to read more »me unbalanced. I'll speak just about the citations: Some sections are overcited, while others have no citations. And there are far too many [citation...
Click to read more »secondary reliable source, a poor quality source like this is NOT needed. WP:OVERCITE - when you only need one good source, use only that. Emails from random...
Click to read more »Also, the "actual event" section contains spoilers too. Some things seem overcited... you don't need to cite the cast list. Night Gyr 02:59, 2 June 2006...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC) No, especially because in a case of WP:OVERCITE, an editor who is not an expert in the topic is liable to remove the second...
Click to read more »that's worded weirdly, I just woke up). Some quite basic statements seem overcited: do we really need four different sources to say that there are two players...
Click to read more »each statement in the notes column, but was unsure whether this would be overciting since all of them are one click away from the link in the home run count...
Click to read more »encyclopedia article with – adding all of them would make for a refbomb/overcite more than something usefully well-sourced. This never became anything besides...
Click to read more »refer to the long, and mostly irrational, discussion at Talk:Chicago#WP:OVERCITE / unreferenced additions, where you attempted to justify the removal of...
Click to read more »row and col scopes per MOS:ACCESS. Confirmed by Teahouse response. WP:OVERCITE, why seven references for Reagan, for example? Unless controversial, just...
Click to read more »for someone come in and say "man those wrestling articles are seriously overcited" to keep this infinity loop of logic going ad nauseum. Count me out, I'm...
Click to read more »references, but they are in total 156, should I put them? I do not want to overcite. Jaespinoza (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC) You might provide a general...
Click to read more »(124.30.94.10 (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)) Oh and it's massively overcited in this article - that needs some major clean-up. I don't see the issue...
Click to read more »I think in such controversial (potential BLP) issues, it's better to overcite than to undercite. Multiple independent sources make it even better. The...
Click to read more »style. I reject that. It is comprehensive. There are some instances of overcite, such as: Wounded four times, he was awarded the Iron Cross First Class...
Click to read more »This should be fixed by using appropriate line-breaks Reference 6 is overcited. Cite it once or twice in a paragraph is OK - just place it at the ends...
Click to read more »controversial? Probably not completely necessary, but I would rather that be overcited than have somebody say there isn't enough evidence to call it controversial...
Click to read more »it is better for stability reasons. Also, it's better to undercite than overcite, and it helps readers locate the reference source more easily. The third...
Click to read more »"Fool," respectively). - Babel41 (talk) 07:21, 31 October 2011 (UTC) Overciting going on also ... Generally there should only be one citation for most...
Click to read more »discontinued. Maybe see if the sources say anything about that. There's a bit of overciting. It's not strictly necessary to cite each sentence if the next is from...
Click to read more »and life imprisonment for murder.[8][23][24][25]" this seems to be WP:OVERCITE. I've removed two of the citations that affirmed the same thing so there's...
Click to read more »first sentence of Discovery by Francis Dixon seems a classic case of WP:OVERCITE. Why does The Reverend need citing, for instance? There, Dixon hoped to...
Click to read more »willing to do that, I would appreciate it at {{User:Technical 13/Templates/Overcite}} Now that I'm aware a similar template was deleted, I'll happily start...
Click to read more »to use the same ref more than once in a row within a paragraph per WP:OVERCITE. When using different articles from the same source, just link the work...
Click to read more »understand the concerns, but I think WP suffers more from under citing than overciting. Since we are only a tertiary source, containing no original research...
Click to read more »Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 01:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC) MOS work needed, and overciting-- this is not a controversial statement, hopefully: School leagues and...
Click to read more »Origin and early life add regnal dates of the various rulers Some WP:OVERCITE instances; unless something is really contentious, more than three references...
Click to read more »(。◕‿◕。) 14:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Delete: Whew. That's a prime example of WP:OVERCITE if I've ever seen one. Long story short, none of the sources are usable...
Click to read more »sources which clause in any given sentence, and its way past the point of WP:OVERCITE. — GabeMc (talk) 03:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC) I have now gone through the article...
Click to read more »appears to be common in accounting and economics. I have slightly WP:OVERCITEd to show that. Pinging (TheGreatWikiLord—Spinningspark—SwisterTwister)...
Click to read more »primary is also in a non-MEDLINE-indexed journal. This seems like an WP:OVERCITE or else orginal research; we are meant to be citing reviews not writing...
Click to read more »bundle the refs? If they are all saying the same thing then that is WP:OVERCITE. There's also a question of style, the rest of the article doesn't use...
Click to read more »the influence of forro? When fixed, will "also" be required? WAY too overcited. Every sentence has a number-clutter at the end. Please ration by removing...
Click to read more »article looks comprehensive and generally well-structured, but it is overcited in many sections; multiple citations should be considerably trimmed (improved...
Click to read more »at GoCE. -talk- the_ed17 -contribs- 17:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC) PS Overciting: I see refs 4, 4, 4, 4 at the end of four successive sentences: this is...
Click to read more »anti-capitalist when it's already been cited. This is an example of WP:OVERCITE and suggests a lack of notability as you're chucking in repeated sources...
Click to read more »leaning too far towards the former IMO at present. There's a tendency to overcite throughout the article. Where a fact is uncontroversial, just use one citation...
Click to read more »the same as the first one) were removed because of problems involving overciting. I checked the edit history and it seems that you added citations to almost...
Click to read more »few inline citations, but they are spotty - some parts are if anything overcited, while other parts are lacking. A Wikipedia article should be a neutral...
Click to read more »Finance link [[21]] which is dead may have been PR. I deleted it per WP:OVERCITE. Much easier to fix than nominating and deleting. You can see from time...
Click to read more »removed. J947 23:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC) The next big issue to address is WP:OVERCITE and especially WP:REPCITE. You do not have to cite every single line. I...
Click to read more »two references moved, back up the entire paragraph anyway. No need to overcite. Brad (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC) "Chesapeake went into ordinary..."...
Click to read more »Although I did not include every source that mentioned it to avoid WP:OVERCITE, Apple's initial release of its supplier list was broadly covered. Would...
Click to read more »start. The article still has issues with section imbalance, updating, overcite that are flagged with cleanup tags. The issues raised by Sandy above (eg...
Click to read more »that all say the same thing. That kind of reference stuffing is called WP:OVERCITE, and it's not only a form of trying to influence the approval, but it makes...
Click to read more »times already ... I don't know. An extra citation would feel a bit like overciting to me, for various reasons. - Dank (push to talk) Added a note; see below...
Click to read more »Support - some technical stuff, mostly nitpicking: This article has some WP:Overcite issues - you don't need citations to the exact same reference for consecutive...
Click to read more »protagonist ... " twists my tongue-- could be just me. I see what looks like overciting in several places, sample: The idea was partially inspired by the portrayal...
Click to read more »was another independent third party source for the info cited, so per WP:OVERCITE, I simply removed the press release. There are a few passing mentions such...
Click to read more »Justice" (ed. Gary Craig, 2018). They are, taken all together, greatly overciting on these articles since they're not using named references, just adding...
Click to read more »seems to me that this article is, on the whole, an extreme case of WP:OVERCITE. For one particular example, take the section Charities and clubs. One...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:OVERCITE. References to blogs, lyric websites and primary sources. Nothing to suggest...
Click to read more »jet stream above and the warm waters below." This needs a citation WP:OVERCITE is an essay, but I think it raises legitimate concerns. Why does the second...
Click to read more »Theft Auto V's development" → "Early in the game's development" Per WP:OVERCITE, a ref should not be used more than once in a row per paragraph (i.e. don't...
Click to read more »in the list it is creating belongs there. Once cite per entry is not overciting. And yes, you do need to cite that the sky is blue.—Kww(talk) 02:30, 17...
Click to read more »Theleftorium 19:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC) On first glance, the article appears overcited, and it's unclear if WP:MEDRS has been taken into account (the popular...
Click to read more »large number of references to support the same simple statement and a WP:OVERCITE type of situation existed, then it might make sense to pick out the best...
Click to read more »February 2009 (UTC) The article is quite clearly encyclopedic per the overcited WP:NOT#DIR. --Mr Accountable (talk) 03:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC) The total...
Click to read more »...) Doesn't hurt ;-) PumpkinSky talk 23:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC) Per WP:OVERCITE to cut down on the blue in the page. Truthkeeper (talk) 00:35, 4 June 2012...
Click to read more »haven't read the entire article but at first glance see problems with overciting and overlinking. Why are there 17 citiations for 8 sentences in the "Early...
Click to read more »WP:OVERCITE suggests possible WP:COI. DrStrauss talk 12:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC) DrStrauss can you advise on the new editing addressing the WP:OVERCITE?----...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hi Fadedmax. You may find these links helpful: WP:CITEDENSE and WP:OVERCITE. A fairly decent overview is at Wikipedia:Citing sources. -- zzuuzz (talk)...
Click to read more »quotes. Some clauses are double and triple cited; there seems to be some overciting, but a content expert would need to evaluate. I found missing named refs...
Click to read more »sourced *Each* stmt, and suspect that the article has now ventured into WP:OVERCITE territory. In regards to your notes regarding "is married", I must agree...
Click to read more »etc. - See WP:REFB. Chzz ► 05:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Although avoid overciting the same source.... if all of the information in a paragraph comes from...
Click to read more »criminal charges, so we can safely trim references to 2 or 3 sources per WP:OVERCITE. Piling up 10 references for one fact tends to give readers the impression...
Click to read more »references in print and blogs. There's a lot of rather unattractive WP:OVERCITE going on in the article, and the article was evidently written by Duncan...
Click to read more »one citation of it at the end of the final sentence is sufficient." (WP:OVERCITE) Dan56 (talk) 00:46, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Per WP:EXCEPTIONAL, this claim...
Click to read more »added to the article if there is demand, but I'd recommend to avoid WP:OVERCITE. I remain convinced 20-20-20 is notable. Are there any reasonable concerns...
Click to read more »19:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Delete. The article seems a classic case of WP:OVERCITE, is much longer than reliable sources allow, and generally comes close...
Click to read more »for pointing that out, but I don't agree on either point. The lead is overcited (does it not properly summarize the article?) and WP:NOT should be respected...
Click to read more »August 2016 (UTC) Delete -- a micro-stub of an article with a case of WP:Overcite: "American telecommunications executive. At Nokia, she oversaw new product...
Click to read more »although these were removed by the AfD nominator as he reported them as overciting (which was a new concept to me, anyway). That's all I want to say. I am...
Click to read more »Ceoil? Nikkimaria (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC) In the spirit of WP:OVERCITE, specifically WP:REPCITE (which, although it is an essay, I think it brings...
Click to read more »sentences?Northwesterner1 (talk)` I would generally say it's better to overcite. It does lead to a "cluttered" look, which is unfortunate, but with evolving...
Click to read more »described in the popular media as a polarizing figure" seems excessive per WP:OVERCITE There was a whole hoorah about including her being polarizing this in the...
Click to read more »concerns over a few things: the addition of a lot of citations (considered overciting; only 1–3 reliable sources are needed); ensuring that the sources are...
Click to read more »improvements & new sourcing. However, the last sentences has a bad case of overcite. Perhaps it could be corrected, by moving some refs into Further reading...
Click to read more »then the article should be longer. Otherwise, looks like a case of an overcite and makes the company look non-notable." K.e.coffman (talk) 04:54, 7 August...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:17, 7 December 2019 (UTC) Definitely less promotional. Has WP:OVERCITE issues now, however. This doesn't change what appears to be a lack of notability...
Click to read more »Approaches last doesn't need that many refs, even in that context; also an overcite at the end of the Oceania section Terminology and periodization missing...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Winner and nominee of non-notable music awards. WP:OVERCITE with interviews, blogs and other non-reliable secondary sources. Nearlyevil665...
Click to read more »on..." --> "armed reconnaissance patrol over the sea south of Crete..." OVERCITE: I'm generally not too concerned by this, but some sentences have three...
Click to read more »April 2013 (UTC) Sources review I think that this article suffers from WP:OVERCITE. Remember, as per WP:PAIC, sources should be placed at the end of a passage...
Click to read more »part of a proper source review. I don't like having to ref stuff and WP:OVERCITE, but will add more if that's what it takes to close this. TechnoTalk (talk)...
Click to read more »reliable sources that confer notability and appears to be a case of WP:OVERCITE. DrStrauss talk 14:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »refer to the long, and mostly irrational, discussion at Talk:Chicago#WP:OVERCITE / unreferenced additions, where you attempted to justify the removal of...
Click to read more »national campaigns? I just deleted a lot of inline references, on the WP:OVERCITE principle. There seemed to be an element of WP:MASK given the number of...
Click to read more »19:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC) Delete - no credible claim of notability, and WP:OVERCITE applies; if you look at the citations, most of them turn out to be cruft...
Click to read more »quality article emerge. A quick browse only shows minor issues, such as overcite to a long list of academic sources at the end of the lead. A good challenge...
Click to read more »coverage. This should be a selective merge, with regard to WP:UNDUE and WP:OVERCITE. There's a suggestion here to skip the normal redirect after the merge...
Click to read more »is the opening sentence of the lead section. I even referred you to WP:OVERCITE. Please stop with the snide attacks. - Sitush (talk) 17:58, 22 February...
Click to read more »and should have been sourced by a single ref. Instead it has a 9 ref WP:OVERCITE, solely to pack in worthless redundant refs. (1)2021 NTC FM Stations" (PDF)...
Click to read more »in the body. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC) I didn't want to overcite it, so there's 3 citations in the first sentence under "Legacy," but that's...
Click to read more »appears to be common in accounting and economics. I have slightly WP:OVERCITEd to show that. Pinging (TheGreatWikiLord—Spinningspark—SwisterTwister)...
Click to read more »That said, the article appears to meet WP:GNG, however some parts are WP:OVERCITE (eg. 7 refs, and some repeated, for a 2 line sentence about the Rotherham...
Click to read more »refbombing issues. Most of the time references concern content, but WP:OVERCITE can be an issue of masking. Otr500 (talk) 16:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »Comment/Question, how can a 300 word article have over 50 references, a case of WP:OVERCITE? Coolabahapple (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC) You are correct, but...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable medical professional, WP:OVERCITE with no apparent pass of WP:GNG. H-index on Google Scholar far from impressive...
Click to read more »than one source given for them. I can give more sources but don't want to overcite it. Anyway, if any content dispute we can discuss it at talk page of article...
Click to read more »the high-value ones. Just as overlinking reduces the value of links, overciting reduces the value of citations. — Carl (CBM · talk) 11:16, 19 January...
Click to read more »[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]" in relationship to WP:BOMBARDMENT and WP:OVERCITE as a means of masking notability through run-of-the-mill and routine coverage...
Click to read more »interest. Msnicki (talk) 00:36, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Delete Overwritten/overcited and UNDUE on a minor and only proposed massage parlour is not what this...
Click to read more »the majority of sources seem to have COI themselves. There are a lot (overciting?), but the fact that everything I have checked does not pass muster makes...
Click to read more »there is no reason to use it. I also feel that where 6 to 15 sources ("overciting") are used for a single claim that removal f the excess sources is not...
Click to read more »19:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Delete. The article seems a classic case of WP:OVERCITE, is much longer than reliable sources allow, and generally comes close...
Click to read more »this topic. jps (talk) 20:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC) You need to read wp:overcite, its quality not quantity that matters, and blogs are not RS.Slatersteven...
Click to read more »is the opening sentence of the lead section. I even referred you to WP:OVERCITE. Please stop with the snide attacks. - Sitush (talk) 17:58, 22 February...
Click to read more »war was lost) has a separate footnote. Good writing also involves not overciting. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 20:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Most readers cannot...
Click to read more »rhetoric. Thus the large number of citations are really examples of WP:OVERCITE yet they fail to support the lead in showing that it is relevant to have...
Click to read more »January 2020 (UTC) Weak Delete Lots of sourcing, but looks like classic overcite.Slatersteven (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »at many of the citations - in part because the article is suspiciously overcited. The National Law Journal and Law360 coverage falls squarely within WP:ROUTINE:...
Click to read more »complete game shutout to tie the all-time record.[48][49][50] Perhaps some WP:OVERCITE-ing? Thanks. chopped 3.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD)...
Click to read more »as a Gentoo package) which are egregiously trivial in nature. Note WP:OVERCITE Power~enwiki (talk) 06:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC) I'm not sure the pure number...
Click to read more »14:44, 12 January 2020 (UTC) Commment has the hallmarks of paid editing: overciting, promotional tone and the 37 references cited in an earlier version collapsed...
Click to read more »now, the article itself fails WP:NOTHOWTO as essentially a recipe with overcite from some non-RSes and passing mentions. This article probably counts as...
Click to read more »notability.) Levivich 04:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC) Seems to be a lot of overciting (five sources to verify she has a chemistry degree!) and lot of use of...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per CBL's cites, two of which (WP:OVERCITE) are now added to the article; Seems sufficient per WP:GNG's "significant...
Click to read more »February 2009 (UTC) The article is quite clearly encyclopedic per the overcited WP:NOT#DIR. --Mr Accountable (talk) 03:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC) The total...
Click to read more »him in RS. Also given it is a work of WP:SPA the deliberate attempt of overciting is clearly attempt to create fake WP:SIGCOV, example citing baseball-reference...
Click to read more »OCLC as it is duplicative, but either way, be consistent.) You also have overcited the statement, "Menzies cabled his approval of the tests on 20 June 1955"...
Click to read more »to pick which ones to include in the article without introducing a WP:OVERCITE problem -- not a normal issue for a WP:BLP that doesn't meet WP:BASIC....
Click to read more »it's possible that this is notable, but it's more likely that it's being overcited by fans. Jergling (talk) 21:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC) Delete since this...
Click to read more »of the article passed met that requirement (the plot info is actually overcited in my opinion), every single statement was cited except for a few completely...
Click to read more »~~~~10Eleventeen 20:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Weak keep - I'm not thrilled with the WP:OVERCITE, but the two films he has directed have media coverage, and so he barely...
Click to read more »has four references, one of which is this footnote, which seems like WP:OVERCITE. "Writings by foreign travelers during the late medieval era, combined...
Click to read more »film, so perhaps this is WP:TOOSOON. The article also suffers from WP:OVERCITE, which I suppose is an unfortunate side effect of trying to pad the reference...
Click to read more »10 more citations doesn't change the article or its notability. See WP:OVERCITE. "... thought to be an autobiography of Henry Avery ..." — If it's an autobiography...
Click to read more »doesn't make every group he belongs to notable by osmosis. And see also WP:OVERCITE. Stacking up a total of 12 citations for the fact that Peterson created...
Click to read more »quality. Here are my concerns: Note 'A' cites six sources at the end (WP:OVERCITE?). I see that ref 2, 8, and 12 are used throughout the article so maybe...
Click to read more »that needs some judicious editing as it appears to be suffering with WP:OVERCITE ie. sentences with 6 or 7 references), agree with above editors that this...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:31, 22 October 2019 (UTC) This list definitely suffers from WP:OVERCITE as references 1 and 6 are used more than four times, which is more times...
Click to read more »one dubious source and a lot of primary sources. I also see a degree of overcite here as well. I suggest nuking and starting from scratch, leaving out all...
Click to read more »have been removed. It appears the article's main issues was actually overciting. Many recipients of awards had two or three references when they only...
Click to read more »(。◕‿◕。) 14:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Delete: Whew. That's a prime example of WP:OVERCITE if I've ever seen one. Long story short, none of the sources are usable...
Click to read more »on with it. In previous reviews the article was criticized for being overcited, so in many cases the practice has been (rightly or wrongly) to rely on...
Click to read more »that needs some judicious editing as it appears to be suffering with WP:OVERCITE ie. sentences with 6 or 7 references), agree with above editors that this...
Click to read more »delegate, it is my opinion (and that of many others, according to LEAD) that overciting a lead can and does constrain writing, impeding the clearest possible...
Click to read more »tell you which statements they think needs citing. I would agree that an overcited article is preferable to an undercited article, however BOTH are inferior...
Click to read more »notability.) Levivich 04:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC) Seems to be a lot of overciting (five sources to verify she has a chemistry degree!) and lot of use of...
Click to read more »- editors have to watch how cited an article is. If the articles gets overcited there's been a new tendency to oppose due to "excessive citations", so...
Click to read more »was another independent third party source for the info cited, so per WP:OVERCITE, I simply removed the press release. There are a few passing mentions such...
Click to read more »technical article understandable do not usually require a source (see also WP:OVERCITE). It is acceptable to present information entirely in own words, including...
Click to read more »essay) Sentence ending with "... sold 11 million units worldwide" is overcited, I would suggest moving the citations closer to content per WP:Integrity...
Click to read more »doing a WP:BEFORE check; given their minimal coverage, this smacks of WP:OVERCITE.Yunshui 雲水 09:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Many sources (whether citeable or...
Click to read more »Sasata (talk) 16:49, 14 September 2011 (UTC) In general, the article is overcited. There is no need to cite consecutive sentence if they all come from the...
Click to read more »provides little information that is non-promotional, and engages in WP:OVERCITE to link to promotional sources. Bakazaka (talk) 21:11, 5 September 2018...
Click to read more »article is loaded with box scores, it is possible for an article to be OVERcited. You're the only one who thinks box scores are necessary for FA status...
Click to read more »in "Format", why is reference [14] used three times in a row? Is it WP:OVERCITE or perhaps we can separate the page numbers and identify on which specific...
Click to read more »standard" much less care about it. As mentioned in earlier comments, overciting is a problem. For example, "HDMI began to appear on consumer HDTV camcorders...
Click to read more »Jytdog (talk) 22:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Jytdog I will agree that Evans is overcited in the current version. I have no need to be told that academic promotion...
Click to read more »criminal charges, so we can safely trim references to 2 or 3 sources per WP:OVERCITE. Piling up 10 references for one fact tends to give readers the impression...
Click to read more »the sentence, I do not think you need a footnote here, as it might be WP:OVERCITE. You could also move [67] to the end of the sentence if it doesn't verify...
Click to read more »film, so perhaps this is WP:TOOSOON. The article also suffers from WP:OVERCITE, which I suppose is an unfortunate side effect of trying to pad the reference...
Click to read more »That said, the article appears to meet WP:GNG, however some parts are WP:OVERCITE (eg. 7 refs, and some repeated, for a 2 line sentence about the Rotherham...
Click to read more »edit, more than five years ago, and nobody since has worried about WP:OVERCITE makes me wonder what other flaws the article has that aren't immediately...
Click to read more »WaltonOne 19:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Besides thinking that WP:ATA is overcited and overrated, I think many of its arguments apply best to the mainspace...
Click to read more »website, saying that he's given interviews, as otherwise you're courting WP:OVERCITE (he's given a fair few interviews, from what I could see). Bromley86 (talk)...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Reply Thanks for striking the oppose. I have tried to avoid overciting university websites, but they do at least meet WP:RS. As Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »think it's fine in this context (mostly based on it's WP-article), but WP:OVERCITE may be an issue. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to encourage collaboration among medical editors, but I was forced to overcite the lead, which then made it a dreadful read with choppy prose, that would...
Click to read more »really put a lot of work into this, and it shows. I still think it's overcited, but that's no reason not to support. -- grm_wnr Esc 10:46, 27 June 2006...
Click to read more »duplicate wikilinks There are no unreferenced paragraphs. Some cases of WP:OVERCITE: The "Hymn to Nikkal" (pictured) is considered to be the oldest surviving...
Click to read more »March 2024 (UTC) I'm going to force it to have fewer references. See WP:OVERCITE. Remsense诉 01:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC) Wow, that was fast! I suspected it...
Click to read more »separate namespace. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 17:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC) See WP:OVERCITE (which I have seen used to "declutter" articles of sources) and {{Excessive...
Click to read more »Jytdog (talk) 22:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Jytdog I will agree that Evans is overcited in the current version. I have no need to be told that academic promotion...
Click to read more »I go pls let me know any concerns there. Comments: I wonder if we're overciting in places, it seems some must be duplicating information -- these are...
Click to read more »info from the body to the infobox; 5) copy edits; and 6) cutting an WP:OVERCITE. I copy edited an article that was linked on 2024 Republican Party presidential...
Click to read more »(in a string of 4 citations of copies of the same piece of writing - WP:OVERCITE in restrospect) which shouldn't have been used. However, I actually did...
Click to read more »already have refs there and don't appear to provide much except hint at WP:OVERCITE Have removed shop references and reworded to suit verifiability. I don't...
Click to read more »different from generally considered to be reliable for the green box and the overcited NEWSORG. I also agree with Goldenshimmer assessment that Fox is closer...
Click to read more »many problems. Without reading in detail, the first thing I saw is its overciting, which makes it difficult for anybody to read it. And there are many other...
Click to read more »row? Consider removing the extra footnotes in the spirit of WP:OVERCITE (although OVERCITE is an essay so this change will not influence my support) I tend...
Click to read more »article talk: Talk:ExxonMobil_climate_change_controversy#February_2016_OVERCITE_issues Additional related primary source: Kheshgi, Haroon (October 13,...
Click to read more »(UTC) I don't think martyr is a technical term, so in the interest of WP:OVERCITE I don't think it should be cited. I think the term is indeed obscure enough...
Click to read more »Jgtrevor Yes - a single source is all you need for any single fact. See WP:OVERCITE. If you are creating an article, then you'd need more sources to demonstrate...
Click to read more »of thoughts needs a source from Lupton. Ok. I tend to both (1) avoid overciting, and (2) go to the other extreme. Personally, I believe that references...
Click to read more »aggressive, finger-wagging pedantry (alphabet souping, template slapping, overciting, etc.). What is your favorite color? :) Why? :) :) Puce, mauve and fuchsia...
Click to read more »several, and not just two or three references, and mainly to avoid WP:OVERCITE formatting problems that may make articles difficult to read, especially...
Click to read more »the same source can accurately be reflected to be one source, as per WP:Overcite? CollinsBK (talk) 08:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Sources: Poughkeepsie...
Click to read more »one thing I still remember from my research days is that is better to overcite claim then to undercite but in this section there is nothing. So where...
Click to read more »than a stack of decent or sub-par sources. WP:CITEKILL WP:CITECLUTTER WP:OVERCITE WP:OVERREF High Don't teach the controversy (That doesn't mean what you...
Click to read more »refbombing issues. Most of the time references concern content, but WP:OVERCITE can be an issue of masking. Otr500 (talk) 16:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »and sure enough - more hits, and I added one. I don't want to violate WP:OVERCITE but in this case I'm sure I'll get some leeway. The WSJ article is behind...
Click to read more »and the citation in the description column cover it, making this a WP:OVERCITE. Done Reywas92Talk 17:50, 15 April 2025 (UTC) @Reywas92: I addressed all...
Click to read more »that Peter should refuse to support an article because he feels it is overcited. He should also note that the sources at Roman-Spartan War come from academic...
Click to read more »subscription, and some are only about the E. Coli outbreak, which is overcited. LOL Intothewoods29 (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC) I can access...
Click to read more »highways are like that - it's part of a standard template and we risk overciting here. --Rschen7754 04:51, 28 March 2013 (UTC) In the table, under the...
Click to read more »overlap previous articles but does overlap gun politics. Like HughD, overcites and includes quotes in the references. Springee (talk) 01:36, 7 March...
Click to read more »Heartfox above, who thought that the footnotes and chart listings were overcited. The first instance of each chart-listing mention has a citation. So they...
Click to read more »logs | views) Are sources in this article reliable? I see one statement overcited. --George Ho (talk) 09:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC) Which ones do you find...
Click to read more »times in eleven sentences in the Description section. This is ridiclous WP:OVERCITE and goes against Wikipedia:When to cite#Text–source relationship ("If you...
Click to read more »good idea to read the article on that (as well as the main article on overciting) before moving forward so we don't make the same mistakes with the new...
Click to read more »in "Format", why is reference [14] used three times in a row? Is it WP:OVERCITE or perhaps we can separate the page numbers and identify on which specific...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Johnbod (talk) 05:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC) Comment/Suggestion: Overciting, e.g.: "All species are listed either as "Vulnerable" or "Endangered"...
Click to read more »that it meets the high quality sources bar Robbins 2016 feels like an overcite to me. The CNN article and Williams 2016 seem to do the job "Nocturnal...
Click to read more »added to get an article past NPP, and some lazy writers will violate WP:OVERCITE to fill up the references section while not bothering to extract new info...
Click to read more »doesn't make every group he belongs to notable by osmosis. And see also WP:OVERCITE. Stacking up a total of 12 citations for the fact that Peterson created...
Click to read more »(UTC) @Cullen328: I removed my citation since it feels like a bit of WP:OVERCITE and now that I think about it, it's possibly WP:SYNTH since the source...
Click to read more »citations is still in use by WP:MILHIST - who generally prefer not to overcite articles (except for claims of numbers killed in battles, and the performance...
Click to read more »support what appears to be a simple uncontroversial statement? See WP:OVERCITE. Cut down to three. ~ Pbritti In general, I'm a minimalist when it comes...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) There's a much simpler solution: many of the paragraphs are overcited - see my comments below. Also, the correct form for named refs isn't employed...
Click to read more »used at the end of a sentence where a quote is made, irregardless of WP:OVERCITE, a sentence which has a quote always needs to be cited after the full stop...
Click to read more »Auto-generated every hour. Editor interaction utility Same type of Godwinizing, overcited contributions as previous socks. Same general geolocation. - MrX 18:46...
Click to read more »Hey yo!I didn't do it! 15:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC) It's an essay, but WP:OVERCITE seems applicable here. --tronvillain (talk) 16:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Yes...
Click to read more »Most editors want a higher density of citations in articles about medical conditions and drugs than is typical for articles about less technical subjects...
Click to read more »with MusicRadar. Fixed Skyshiftertalk 09:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC) Giant overcite with note b. 7 citations is not needed; pick your best three and remove...
Click to read more »Both were critically acclaimed but sold poorly.[1][2][3] - once again overcited. Rather than linking to three press articles, can you find a book source...
Click to read more »331dot (talk) 09:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC) @TaraLemming: please read WP:OVERCITE. We surely don't need 11 citations to support a fairly non-contentious...
Click to read more »and the candidate himself presents it as an example of a good edit. WP:overcite aside, I am sorry but I don't think any editor that uses Metro and some...
Click to read more »accordingly. I'm no proponent of WP:THREE and I actually think that a little bit OVERCITE on stub and start type articles can facilitate further expansion, but because...
Click to read more »dollars" linked? Is it exotic, like the Tibetan razu? Parts of it are overcited. Here's a doozler: "The attendance boundaries of Benavidez Elementary...
Click to read more »or The Stationary Office. You can fix it yourself. Please also read WP:OVERCITE. RudolfRed (talk) 22:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Actually, that is the current...
Click to read more »out additional sources for potentially controversial items, and simply overcite. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 01:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC) 1. Forgotten Yesterdays...
Click to read more »punctuation (see WP:MOS#Captions). Also, the article appears seriously overcited-- numerous seemingly simple statements have three, four, five even six...
Click to read more »don't doubt that the material is entirely verifiable, I suspect that overciting may be a problem here. Some paragraphs contain two or three (sometimes...
Click to read more »one thing I still remember from my research days is that is better to overcite claim then to undercite but in this section there is nothing. So where...
Click to read more »If we do not properly cite interesting facts and err on the side of overciting this is not likely to happen.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowt...
Click to read more »It's all from one single long quote on the same page so prefer not to overcite here. Plus this section might not stay, so have left for now. Victoria...
Click to read more »currently undercited, an equal number of editors [Elonka] find the article overcited.) I will be happy, as I said, to provide citations.—DCGeist 09:52, 2 March...
Click to read more »can be challenging in places. The sentence with the ice cap size seems overcited. Is the 1992 the only source that say it's 70 m2? Globally, ice caps have...
Click to read more »performances More WP:OVERCITE, just use ref#80 at the end of the "'Don't Stop the Music' and 'Umbrella'" bit. Re-issue and remix album More WP:OVERCITE, ref#124 should...
Click to read more »The consensus seems to be to err on the side of underciting rather than overciting. GaryColemanFan (talk) 01:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC) This particular fact...
Click to read more »have likely commented on the MOS:LEADCITE which was, in my assessment, WP:OVERCITE. The citations which have been removed did not show anything beyond some...
Click to read more »article as sources. Skarz (talk) 18:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC) See wp:overcite.Slatersteven (talk) 18:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC) See also, WP:PROVEIT...
Click to read more »policies like WP:USER are reasonably flexible. You've already had an ANI for overciting policy. Sure, the page is in the wrong place, but that doesn't mean it...
Click to read more »the info box; and this is an example of an article which is burdened by overciting of trivial facts and poor placement of inline citations. Attention to...
Click to read more »paragraph – although I'm sure you don't need all of them. The comments about overciting probably refer to your tendency, here and elsewhere, to multi-cite simple...
Click to read more »probably post on thursday or friday. To warn, I'm still concerned re overciting, you have 682 inlines at the moment, but need to think through again given...
Click to read more »edits of earlier blocked sock [56] and [57], and carrying on habitual WP:OVERCITE.[58][59] Raymond3023 (talk) 03:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC) Accused parties may...
Click to read more »requirement of a "professional standard" of formatting. Like overlinking, overciting can make the reading harder. I think the prose is generally quite good...
Click to read more »the main topic. When to add the sources? Well we have to deal with WP:OVERCITE, which an essay but a useful one. Basically, we don't want to cram in 9...
Click to read more »tweet. I will not oppose based on Overciting, but I do recommend that another look is taken for this. WP:OVERCITE is a good essay to read on this topic...
Click to read more »agree with you. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 01:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC) WP:OVERCITE - The first graph has 14 cites for five sentences. This came up during...
Click to read more »for the general user. It is heavily over-cited and over-quoted per WP:OVERCITE. GA/FA criteria: 1. well-written: Generally, yes. Major caveats are that...
Click to read more »05:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC) Of course this is overciting. Of course the one source was enough. But this overciting is a direct effect of FreeKnowledgeCreators...
Click to read more »to the sockmaster's to be a coincidence. See also their propensity for overciting ([28], [29], [30], [31]) and the lack of spaces in their edit summaries...
Click to read more »minimally pseudo-offensive content pass without mention of the ridiculously overcited and misinterpreted civility and NPA policies? Does no one realise that...
Click to read more »everything about me that's ever been written about me" syndrome. Try WP:OVERCITE as an explanation. I often mention the "less is more" concept. Would she...
Click to read more »Assessed as C class. It has potential: See WP:NPOV, MOS:FILMPLOT and WP:OVERCITE for ways to improve it. Trotsk6 (talk) 20:11, 9 July 2026 (UTC) Requesting...
Click to read more »row and col scopes per MOS:ACCESS. Confirmed by Teahouse response. WP:OVERCITE, why seven references for Reagan, for example? Unless controversial, just...
Click to read more »is a waste of everybody's time to add another citation for it. See WP:OVERCITE. Meanwhile, in a BLP, if there is information which is not supported by...
Click to read more »22 July 2017 (UTC) I agree with @Finnusertop: that it is possible to overcite sources. I'm nervous about concluding that one is enough. I have seen situations...
Click to read more »[34][43][47] Channelling my inner RoySmith, we might have a bit of an WP:OVERCITE issue here ;) Yeah, I see what you mean. Ironic since I just commented...
Click to read more »20:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC) Comment: This appears to be a case of wp:overcite: could the citations be consolidated, or at least put to the end of the...
Click to read more »from the Plain Pat one so I invoked it only once from there onwards per overcite guidelines. Will look at the other sources tomorrow. Sonic Magazine have...
Click to read more »aircraft.[9][12][13] You've got three citations for a single sentence (WP:OVERCITE). The last one covers everything so the first two are just clutter. Why...
Click to read more »present throughout the article, these need to be taken care of. Ton of WP:OVERCITE throughout, some of these claims have 5-6 citations after (peaking at 8)...
Click to read more »thing to do, but sometimes more is not always better. You might find WP:OVERCITE helpful. It's only an essay, but there's lots of useful information in...
Click to read more »enough enough? Barring the ridiculous (ten citations for each sentence) overciting is impossible. What is sufficient? Well, you don't need to place an inline...
Click to read more »like it might pass NFF but right now this is suffering from a form of WP:OVERCITE. Offhand I'll say that this film will almost certainly release and gain...
Click to read more »December 2023 (UTC) I'm wondering if some of the smaller phrases are not overcited-- for instance, why do you need three for " It was installed by Ravenna...
Click to read more »eastern U.S.--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC) Looks like overciting-- why do simple statements like these require four sources? The bog turtle...
Click to read more »to internally comply with Wikipedia's policy on citation overkill (WP:OVERCITE).--NØ 19:48, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Personally, I don't think it's overkill to...
Click to read more »template for "more citations [plural] needed" doesn't make sense. Per WP:OVERCITE, we do not want a stack-up of citations for each point. We only have {{additional...
Click to read more »new rule? I feel it may be a tad WP:OVERCITE.Zigzig20s (talk) 13:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC) How can it be overciting if no citation for each film...
Click to read more »there looks like a degree over wp:overcite going on.Slatersteven (talk) 10:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC) The degree of overciting and "referenciness" in the advocates'...
Click to read more »without adding any additional text that rajtantrtv supports violating WP:OVERCITE. Rajtantrtv.com says in the headline that the court admonished the petitioner...
Click to read more »good review. I removed a couple of unnecessary citations (though some overcite is still there) Demixing (audio), now Draft:Demixing (audio) – TheChunky...
Click to read more »- editors have to watch how cited an article is. If the articles gets overcited there's been a new tendency to oppose due to "excessive citations", so...
Click to read more »email) 01:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC) @John M Wolfson:, yes, the lead is overcited, but more importantly, it is choppy and unpleasant to read. Here is the...
Click to read more »be ok in this case, dat's fine. I am concerned about this element of "overciting," which goes on to create a size problem. But its not something which...
Click to read more »(talk | contribs) 18:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC) There is considerable overciting which makes it difficult to check whether sources actually support statements...
Click to read more »Wright and Page ;-) Y Absolutely, that article is a gold mine. I probably overcite, but I do it so someone else can come in later and add material to the...
Click to read more »defences. I agree with the above, just a couple of times facts appear to be overcited - though could you find a cite or two for the last two paragraphs in Would...
Click to read more »include a citation only at the end of the last sentence so as to avoid overciting, so some sentences may appear unsourced but in fact that is not the case...
Click to read more »want me to remove detail. Didn't you also complain that the article was overcited, now you want cites added? — GabeMc (talk) 19:51, 4 November 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »places where the opposite it true - there are a couple of instances of overcite/refbombs. Those should be cleaned up, either removing sources that are...
Click to read more »instrumentals" Rephrased. J Milburn (talk) 14:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC) Per WP:OVERCITE, a ref shouldn't be used more than once in a row per paragraph (refs#1...
Click to read more »of the article passed met that requirement (the plot info is actually overcited in my opinion), every single statement was cited except for a few completely...
Click to read more »on Fire" video. Moisejp (talk) 23:22, 26 July 2025 (UTC) There is some overciting, with several statements followed with four to five references. I've trimmed...
Click to read more »I think in such controversial (potential BLP) issues, it's better to overcite than to undercite. Multiple independent sources make it even better. The...
Click to read more »François Robere (talk) 10:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC) See WP:REFBOMB and WP:OVERCITE. Ask for the single best sourcew, and if it doesn't satsify WP:V for our...
Click to read more »that does that?128.214.53.104 (talk) 07:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC) I guess overcite is easier to fix than insufficient refs - just trim the overkills. Brandmeistertalk...
Click to read more »...) Doesn't hurt ;-) PumpkinSky talk 23:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC) Per WP:OVERCITE to cut down on the blue in the page. Truthkeeper (talk) 00:35, 4 June 2012...
Click to read more »editing – Disruptive editing by User:Footballsaints. User has engaged in overciting, redundant citing, and now continually readding copyvio material that...
Click to read more »eastern U.S.--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC) Looks like overciting-- why do simple statements like these require four sources? The bog turtle...
Click to read more »really put a lot of work into this, and it shows. I still think it's overcited, but that's no reason not to support. -- grm_wnr Esc 10:46, 27 June 2006...
Click to read more »took out much of the information that was there and left an issue of WP:OVERCITE that has yet to be addressed (which is why it would make more sense to...
Click to read more »14:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC) Leads are summaries and as such this is overcited. Some refs need format work, prose weak, sentences/paragraphs choppy....
Click to read more »Fyddlestix (talk) 20:23, 22 November 2017 (UTC) No. You dont need to overcite. The lede is still a summary of the body. If it has multiple cites in the...
Click to read more »really put a lot of work into this, and it shows. I still think it's overcited, but that's no reason not to support. -- grm_wnr Esc 10:46, 27 June 2006...
Click to read more »(UTC) I figured. Both from personal experience in genre wars and per WP:OVERCITE, that's typically why multiple citations are given. If you think it's necessary...
Click to read more »battles and exploits." Please see Casemate's blog. Separately, please see WP:Overcite and Extraordinary claims sections for additional discussion on sources...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) added the main category to the deletion. Forgetting it was an overcite on my part. Mason (talk) 01:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC) Delete all per...
Click to read more »multiple duplicated redlinks. I can't tell whether it is overcited, but it looks overcited. The "Further reading" section seems to duplicate quite a...
Click to read more »August 2007 (UTC) Support I still think it is overcited; however given the option between an overcited article and an undercited one, I suppose this is...
Click to read more »I eventually decided to clean it up tonight. Despite the puffery and overcites, the guy does appear to be notable. However I also noticed that there...
Click to read more »songcraft.[120]" Suggest you review WP:BUNDLING and read the essay WP:OVERCITE, and then work on reducing problem areas like this (13 citations in two...
Click to read more »of the facts in a sentence, but I feel like in numerous places you've overcited there. Nonetheless, as I said, the overall article is plenty good enough...
Click to read more »portals to articles like older socks:[84][85], [86][87], [88] Habit of overciting and adding citations alone like older socks:[89],[90], [91], [92][93]...
Click to read more »controversial? Probably not completely necessary, but I would rather that be overcited than have somebody say there isn't enough evidence to call it controversial...
Click to read more »with personal problems, unsourced. But there are good points about WP:OVERCITE. I didn't invent the notion that it's not ideal. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:17...
Click to read more »supports the rest. To multi-cite the sentence for each genus would be overciting IMO. Macrophyseter | talk 05:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC) 115: OK. 43: Where...
Click to read more »future, please be aware of footnote placement per WP:FN. The article is overcited to the point that it violates WP:NOT and looks like a blog or webpage...
Click to read more »Rock") should only be used at the end of the second paragraph per WP:OVERCITE. WP:OVERCITE also says to have an inline citation for "all direct quotations...
Click to read more »have warned the editor previously on multiple occassion for constantly overciting, however editor doesn't seem to bother and keep adding back unnecessary...
Click to read more »the page loads from dialup for the first time in years. Overlinking, overciting, and excess detail have been identified, a GA review has been initiated...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Reply Thanks for striking the oppose. I have tried to avoid overciting university websites, but they do at least meet WP:RS. As Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »fixed your three-overcite issues, since I have already fixed a good number of them prior with Femke's. Two successive cites isn't overciting. WP:FACRITERIA...
Click to read more »