This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
WP:OTHERSTUFFWP:OTHERSTUFF WP:OTHERWP:OTHER WP:OSEWP:OSE WP:WAXWP:WAX Examples: Keep There's an article on x, and this is just as famous as that. EmperorOtherstuff (talk)...
Click to read more »wp:OTHERSTUFF, that my argument is wrong. Generically pointing to other sucky articles in Wikipedia that are unrelated is subject to OTHERSTUFF-based...
Click to read more »that just has the point scorers only. And... Not only does OTHERSTUFF not apply (OTHERSTUFF refers to articles similar in concept, not duplication of content)...
Click to read more »given WP:NORUSH. I've now added the sources. As to nom's "otherstuff", I point him to WP:OTHERSTUFF, which clarifies that his pointing to other articles not...
Click to read more »problem before they can fix any instance of it. Remember, there is no deadline. We can fix problems with other articles later. WP:OTHERSTUFF WP:IMPERFECT...
Click to read more »being eligible for deletion? Pdxuser (talk) 06:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid Keep argument. Hollywood Game Night is not a panel game...
Click to read more »an elected representative. LibStar (talk) 09:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't an argument in favour of keeping an article. It must be kept on...
Click to read more »result was delete. Wikipedia is not a guide or means of advertisement. WP:OTHERSTUFF also prevails. Mkdwtalk 03:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Glendower Residence...
Click to read more »make WP:OTHERSTUFF statements. Ridernyc (talk) 19:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC) So it isn't a suitable argument then. Sorry about breaking that otherstuff rule;...
Click to read more »was delete. No independent sources and the only Keep argument was WP:OTHERSTUFF. RL0919 (talk) 14:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »of articles on closely related topics is irrelevant: this is just WP:OTHERSTUFF. Perhaps all of these people are notable but nobody's had the time or...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Again source coverage is routine and/or passing coverage. WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid reason. Spshu (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC) Coverage...
Click to read more »nominator, outside of a handful of OTHERSTUFF links. Carrite (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC) Comment. The so-called OTHERSTUFF links are deletion discussions...
Click to read more »notability. Umbralcorax (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF -- Just because otherstuff exists doesn't mean that this should. Perhaps every other...
Click to read more »makes TNA any difference? D.M.N. (talk) 14:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF.--Fabrictramp (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Comment, Wikipedia:MUSIC#Albums...
Click to read more »December 2007 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. - Fayenatic (talk) 16:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC) The article for this WP:OTHERSTUFF comparison was deleted! Your...
Click to read more »decision, I have discounted some keep arguments on the grounds of WP:OTHERSTUFF. I am also swayed by the WP:NOTNEWS argument over claims the article is...
Click to read more »individual entries for individual episodes of other TV shows but, per WP:OTHERSTUFF, that does not mean that this article needs to exist, especially since...
Click to read more »other country in the world would not be notable" is the other side of WP:OTHERSTUFF. Being in the US does indeed mean that it might have received more significant...
Click to read more »com/user/db/badges/22786 Tonyfelice -- (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2010 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. This article does not have any sources to indicate why any of the badges...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was keep. Broad consensus to keep, WP:OTHERSTUFF with a dose of slippery slope fearmongering is pretty much the only argument...
Click to read more »of notability, and the argument in my nomination stands; please see WP:OTHERSTUFF in response to your argument that the other characters have articles....
Click to read more »other similar articles existing (or not existing) is irrelevant per WP:OTHERSTUFF, which states you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on whether...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was redirect to Vegas Golden Knights. WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:CRYSTAL carry the policy based arguments. No prejudice for recreation...
Click to read more »put up at WP:FL) are like that. Now you could say that I'm making an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument but there has been prior consensus (see Jan 2007, May 2007 and...
Click to read more »moderated and has a place in WP. Whereas spurious list haters who use WP:OTHERSTUFF as a self-perpetuating argument does not. What happens after decimating...
Click to read more »starting from 2005 when he was eight years old. See What about article x? (OTHERSTUFF) as to why this is a bad argument..--Mvqr (talk) 15:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »relisting was to get just some more consenus due to the votes based on WP:OTHERSTUFF. Tigraan has also added some more sources to the article. (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »deletion. Warden (talk) 17:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC) Classic example of WP:OTHERSTUFF. However some of those articles you mention are really disambiguation...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF Dronebogus (talk) 15:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF cuts both ways. I think List of people...
Click to read more »I see you've not participated in an AfD for some years. That's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. It could be that other articles you refer to should be deleted...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep - passes WP:GNG, per the sources in the article. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFF aside, we do have an article on Prince George of Cambridge, a minor British...
Click to read more »January 2021 (UTC) Comment - If that article is deleted this should go WP:OTHERSTUFF. No comment on the article (and I was pinged here, apparently everyone...
Click to read more »etc then we should also have this kind of articles which violates WP:OTHERSTUFF. As a stand alone article, doesn't seem to be a notable enough topic with...
Click to read more »this page. The result was delete. The "keep" !votes are based on WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:INHERITED. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:20, 29 August 2010 (UTC) Sexual XXXXX...
Click to read more »would be a strange exception. Chri$topher 18:07, 19 June 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a good reason - also, this is SuNdanese, not Sudanese. Ansh666...
Click to read more »Consistency is important.Synchronism (talk) 09:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF and feel free to nominate for deletion any other articles (or group of...
Click to read more »result was Delete - fails WP:CORP and no arguments presented other than WP:OTHERSTUFF SmartSE (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC) Shop Direct TV (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »Sweden and MasterChef Australia. I know that what I'm saying reeks of WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:NOHARM but still. Reality shows seem to defy logic around here :-)...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't a reason to keep this one. The Bushranger One ping only 00:15, 29...
Click to read more »independent notability which is why a whole load of them are at AFD. WP:OTHERSTUFF applies here as well as WP:NALBUMS. ŞůṜīΣϹ98¹Speak 07:42, 7 March 2012...
Click to read more »WP:NOTDIR, some arguments assigned low weight for reasons covered at WP:OTHERSTUFF j⚛e deckertalk 19:54, 1 May 2014 (UTC) List of ABQ RIDE Transit routes...
Click to read more »WP:OTHERSTUFF, which generally is not a valid argument. Travellingcari (talk) 02:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC) I am not sure why you cited WP:OTHERSTUFF; I...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC) Comment. You might want to read WP:OTHERSTUFF. Or you could just nominate Hott Beat for deletion. Clarityfiend (talk)...
Click to read more »Tucson Fringe Festival. The criteria of WP:N needs to be satisfied, and WP:OTHERSTUFF is not an argument. Hzh (talk) 10:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »there, not notable. Oh, and WP:OTHERSTUFF never belongs in AfD discussions. — Wyliepedia 03:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC) OTHERSTUFF is just an excuse to avoid the...
Click to read more »there are others out there doesn't give a right to keep them, per WP:OTHERSTUFF.Tavix (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Simply put, standings are not...
Click to read more »families Are you intending to nominate them all for deletion? I know this is OTHERSTUFF, but I don't see the point of deleting just this one. The Australian football...
Click to read more »of English irregular verbs.アイーダ (talk) 02:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. NOTDICT is about as clear as you can get, this is blatantly just an English...
Click to read more »The result was delete. A lot of the "keep" arguments boil down to WP:OTHERSTUFF and generic historical arguments without reference to relevant policy...
Click to read more »articles for their competitors or similar companies. This is were the WP:OTHERSTUFF argument carries some weight. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:36...
Click to read more »Madegray (talk • contribs) 12:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC) You're making a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Pax 22:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC) But he's right, that is another...
Click to read more »Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeL1976 (talk • contribs) WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid argument for keeping an article. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:27...
Click to read more »contained a fine selection of classic invalid arguments like WP:USEFUL and WP:OTHERSTUFF. As for the argument that being a linux distribution should of itself...
Click to read more »bio articles, website articles etc. I think we should be using the WP:OTHERSTUFF argument as a means of determining notability by saying "there are no...
Click to read more »in the past. Dream Focus 18:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC) And like I said WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't a valid argument. Each article should be judged as its own standards...
Click to read more »hasn't produced any. Also keep arguments are variations of INTERESTING & OTHERSTUFF which cut no ice. Spartaz Humbug! 06:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Soccer...
Click to read more »cleanup. jj137 (Talk) 01:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Comment - Refer to WP:OTHERSTUFF Mayalld (talk) 07:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete - Non-notable. Mayalld...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment, WP:OTHERSTUFF? Phlegm Rooster (talk) 23:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC) For what feels like the zillionth time... WP:OTHERSTUFF is a personal essay...
Click to read more »the others are? --Briancua (talk) 02:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. The West Wing is a critically acclaimed, award wining television series...
Click to read more »Dpmuk (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Keep, at the risk of invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF, I don't see why this article can't be developed into something like Winning...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed by article creator with a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. This seems to be an entirely unremarkable bus route. TheLongTone...
Click to read more »notable actors. —МандичкаYO 😜 01:28, 17 April 2015 (UTC) Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF, which states you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on whether...
Click to read more »articles on other Titanic survivors. This is a poor argument: part WP:OTHERSTUFF, and partly because many of the people on the ship would merit biographies...
Click to read more »broad scope, I see no reason for deletion. I don't see this as an WP:OTHERSTUFF arguement, because I'm not argueing that the list should be kept merely...
Click to read more »Edwige9 (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC) Pointing to other articles is an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, which does not cut the mustard here. Maybe they should be deleted...
Click to read more »2018 ended in no consensus where the only keep votes were based on WP:OTHERSTUFF existing on Wikipedia. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »• Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Delete - I'm gonna go OTHERSTUFF here, so feel free to disregard closing administrator, in the event sources...
Click to read more »to be a keep closure. However, some of the keep rationales are using OTHERSTUFF arguments, and as such, I have given little weight. Despite these, it's...
Click to read more »School of Cinematic Arts. I redirected but was reverted by an IP citing OTHERSTUFF, so taking it here. This is an academic division within a larger school...
Click to read more »representative of even a non-notable OSS project. Not to get too much into WP:OTHERSTUFF, but it is a plugin for the (certainly notable) Pidgin, about no other...
Click to read more »WP:USEFUL, WP:INTERESTING, not convinced by delete !voters (how?), WP:OTHERSTUFF, etc. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC) List of couples with British...
Click to read more »far, mainly being "otherstuff." Potatoswatter (talk) 23:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC) Comment I agree that there is an element of otherstuff here, and that the...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC) WP:VAGUEWAVE. I don't think you understand when WP:OTHERSTUFF is actually a...
Click to read more »ones I stumbled across via the aardvark/inspector issues. However, WP:OTHERSTUFF. I dont see how these episodes can be anything other than stubs, ever...
Click to read more »The result was delete. The only argument to keep was an appeal to WP:OTHERSTUFF -- RoySmith (talk) 23:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC) The 31 Flavors (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »around it. White 720 (talk) 17:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC) First of all, WP:OTHERSTUFF, secondly, the Chinese Democracy article has 55 references to its notability...
Click to read more »Italy. --Checco (talk) 06:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC) The fact that WP:OTHERSTUFF exists does not make it right. I would indeed remove half of the articles...
Click to read more »subject fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Keep arguments were mostly based on WP:OTHERSTUFF. — CactusWriter (talk) 22:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »encyclopedic value and don't see other "single table" pages (not that WP:OTHERSTUFF would be a valid argument). Ost (talk) 23:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »the existance of US OTHERSTUFF as a reason for retention, nor can one merely note the deletion of Australian or Swedish OTHERSTUFF and hold that as a reason...
Click to read more »suggest that otherstuff was a policy, just that it was an argument that holds little merit in deletion discussions. The reason otherstuff exists is because...
Click to read more »to the new editors of this AFD that you please read WP:PLEASEDONT, WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:NFF, and WP:FUTURE. Mkdwtalk 16:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Fan (film)...
Click to read more »me. I read WP:OTHERSTUFF and now understand what you mean, I'll try to keep all the discourse rules in mind. I noticed in WP:OTHERSTUFF the clause about...
Click to read more »this page. The result was delete all. The keep !votes are basically WP:OTHERSTUFF or other arguments not related to the notability or suitability of these...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a reason for keeping anything. Given that nobody has indicated...
Click to read more »media coverage. --CyberXRef☎ 20:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC) Keep per WP:OTHERSTUFF and Amazon fresh. Meets N, per ref brought by Northamerica1000 --Shuki...
Click to read more »appear to be borderline N, or non-notable (COI and/or promo), and WP:OTHERSTUFF applies. Widefox; talk 21:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Hello, I am new to...
Click to read more »George W. Bush for example. --Tocino 20:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF Lugnuts (talk) 08:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Merge and redirect to Joseph...
Click to read more »article stands up to others is not relevant to this discussion because OTHERSTUFF. Netherzone (talk) 16:52, 1 May 2021 (UTC) Comment - I have opened this...
Click to read more »what the problem is?--Bduke (talk) 09:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC) Keep WP:OTHERSTUFF I know but there is a raft of politically themed userboxes many of which...
Click to read more »Warden (talk) 18:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Strongest possible keep per WP:OTHERSTUFF. Hans Adler 20:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Comment - Is there such a thing...
Click to read more »and WP:OTHERSTUFF. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC) most articles on contemporary artists are much more flowery = WP:OTHERSTUFF. Not a...
Click to read more »guy have?! Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 20:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF is never a good argument and your attempts to turn the article into a...
Click to read more »2007 to manage this degree of notable content. To your argument from WP:OTHERSTUFF, the previous AFD mentioned similar still-extant articles for Clinton...
Click to read more »WP:WIKILAWYER - We care less about technicalities than the spirit of policy. WP:OTHERSTUFF - If you find an older Wikipedia article on another subject that seems...
Click to read more »both know what the officer's answer will be. That's the spirit of WP:OTHERSTUFF.Metaphor ends here Kraxler (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC) It seems...
Click to read more »WP:OTHERSTUFF, your comment has no merit. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 15:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Actually, my comment has merit according to WP:OTHERSTUFF...
Click to read more »The result was delete. Noting that the keep votes amount to either WP:OTHERSTUFF or offer no rebuttal to the compelling arguments offered by User:NinjaRobotPirate...
Click to read more »or in small reviews. Listing at AfD after {{prod}} removed with a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Mikeblas 04:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT, this...
Click to read more »figure it out Chzz ► 16:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Keep - not meaning a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument ... but ...your saying that keyboardists are less notable than...
Click to read more »(UTC) The analogy to phone numbers is nonsense, as is the invocation of OTHERSTUFF. I'm sorry but you're just exposing how superficial your understanding...
Click to read more »Redirect to April Mop. Dede2008 (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Keep Per WP:OTHERSTUFF; we have an article on tire so we may as well have one for wheel. PCHS-NJROTC...
Click to read more »better references than delete it (talk) 17:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't a good reason to keep an article. All the other users involved in...
Click to read more »establish policy-based reasons for keeping, instead being based on WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ITEXISTS arguments. Fails WP:MMAEVENT, etc. Information can be...
Click to read more »were not particularly valid. I saw Wikipedia:I don't see why not, WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:USEFUL, WP:INHERITED, WP:EFFORT, etc. The three articles are unreferenced...
Click to read more »"Mechanicsburg Area Senior High School". And further in the wisdom of WP:OTHERSTUFF "identifying articles of the same nature that have been established and...
Click to read more »thought she was notable enough (possibly under the all-too-common WP:OTHERSTUFF assumption). She might well agree, if she were in on this discussion,...
Click to read more »and few refs. Pilif12p : Yo 17:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC) Keep I know WP:OTHERSTUFF, but I also know WP:BIAS. The "problem" with this school seems to be that...
Click to read more »the database.Siriuscakefan 12:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Please read WP:OTHERSTUFF. Hitro talk 17:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Delete - no coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »--Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Comment- Keeping WP:OTHERSTUFF in mind, just for information I would like to bring deletion discussions...
Click to read more »there was some defence of the article on the talk page. But it's all OTHERSTUFF arguments. SpinningSpark 19:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC) Delete - as not meting...
Click to read more »per nom. Other fake Amazing Race pages should also be deleted, but WP:OTHERSTUFF doesn't cut it in any case. Matt Deres (talk) 21:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Per WP:OTHERSTUFF, the presence of other articles about judokas who came 7th in European...
Click to read more »have noted the keep rationale of Arxiloxos. This is essentially a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument which is not normally given any weight in deletion discussions...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Your argument appears to be based on OTHERSTUFF, this is not an accepted rationale for an article. Nothing you have said...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC) This is what I meant by WP:OTHERSTUFF, otherstuff exists and is not a excuse for the keeping of material. I didn't...
Click to read more »April 2015 (UTC) Delete - although the nomination is a poor mix of WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:USELESS, the article is a poor organisation of content. Since none...
Click to read more »keep comments advanced any policy-based opinions. See WP:ILIKEIT and WP:OTHERSTUFF for more information. --jonny-mt 04:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC) Frankie Loscavio...
Click to read more »result was Delete - fails WP:CORP and no arguments presented other than WP:OTHERSTUFF SmartSE (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC) Shop Direct TV (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »states we should keep this because we keep other characters - how about WP:OTHERSTUFF? CyanGardevoir 06:28, 28 May 2012 (UTC) No, my argument is that we have...
Click to read more »create. — --Neil (talk) 15:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC) The argument WP:OTHERSTUFF doesn't carry weight in these discussions. The concern here is that this...
Click to read more »unremarkable event. The above "keep" comment is along the lines of WP:OTHERSTUFF and is from an account with no other contributions. K.e.coffman (talk)...
Click to read more »should be considered.--174.91.187.80 (talk) 23:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF is another discussion, but feel free to nominate it, though. soetermans...
Click to read more »you are welcome to PROD or AFD those other articles, but they are WP:OTHERSTUFF. WidgetKid this is the way 21:25, 12 February 2026 (UTC) Draftify per...
Click to read more »December 2008 (UTC) Avoid WP:OTHERSTUFF Arguements please. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC) The Otherstuff argument was in response...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Kind of an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument as I see it. Nweil (talk) 22:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Nweil, that's not WP:OTHERSTUFF. I haven't referenced another...
Click to read more »played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP, based on an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »192. Pointing to other articles is not a valid keep rationale per WP:OTHERSTUFF unless those articles have been through an AFD also. Nor is it sufficient...
Click to read more »son was president. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF is not the focus here, and Ann was actually noted for more than just being...
Click to read more »to Food Network Star (season 8)? (And I'm not one to throw around WP:OTHERSTUFF, but...all the contestants from American Idol generally have articles...
Click to read more »History of the Korean church and other books, as noted by Cullen328. And WP:OTHERSTUFF is a weak deletion argument. -- 202.124.72.155 (talk) 04:35, 31 July 2011...
Click to read more »not have separate articles. The two keep votes were variations of WP:OTHERSTUFF. I rather redirect the articles instead of deleting them so that material...
Click to read more »chance to be expanded Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. And to thge article creator, I entirely agree about the plethora of dull...
Click to read more »T3chl0v3r (talk) 01:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Comment - So, basically, WP:OTHERSTUFF? Brianga (talk) 21:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Delete Insufficient notability...
Click to read more »prod for notability and WP:NOT#HOWTO. Prod removed citing WP:OTHERSTUFF. WP:OTHERSTUFF being irrelevant to this article, it still fails WP:NOT#HOWTO...
Click to read more »similar nature don't automatically qualify this article for a keep (see WP:OTHERSTUFF), it seems that a WWI history page for at least the Ottoman Empire is...
Click to read more »articles into one. KarelOrHarken555 (talk) 01:22, 14 April 2026 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF what happened to other article should not be discussed in a deletion discussion...
Click to read more »Keep many other sports presenters have articles. I know that reeks of OTHERSTUFF, but it does show you precedent where WP:ENT is currently pretty unclear...
Click to read more »The keep !votes make arguments that can be characterised as either WP:OTHERSTUFF, or an argument to notability based on Kinnard's professional output and...
Click to read more »- Kzirkel (talk) 14:22, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Kzirkel, please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Curbon7 (talk) 23:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:GNG per Filetime's...
Click to read more »--Arias Levhita (talk) 21:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Comment please see WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:USEFUL/WP:ILIKEIT, none of which are valid keep arguments. There...
Click to read more »media categories. Ganeshprasadkp (talk) 06:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Saqib (talk) 07:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »irrelevant per WP:OTHERSTUFF. Gruntler (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC) It is relevant as a part of the argument, see WP:OTHERSTUFF: "While these comparisons...
Click to read more »not notable for its own page.. And to the editor directly above me, WP:OTHERSTUFF. Spanneraol (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »in my opinion. I originally requested a speedy, but the author used WP:OTHERSTUFF and cited Northwestern Corporation and Oak Manufacturing. Jujutacular...
Click to read more »foreign-language Wikipedias. --Razakel19 (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Me-123567-Me (talk) 19:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »trivial mentions in match reports and the like. While being aware of OTHERSTUFF, he is clearly more notable than a lot of the English footballers that...
Click to read more »field. Either the article fits in Wikipedia, or it doesn't. See also WP:OTHERSTUFF for other reasons your argument might not be valid. -- Mikeblas 14:38...
Click to read more »was delete. as unnecessary WP:SPLIT. Arguments for "keep" are mainly WP:OTHERSTUFF (not acceptable argument) and "notability is established" (but, the notability...
Click to read more »this page. The result was delete. The keep !votes lean heavily on WP:OTHERSTUFF and speculation about what a nonexistent SNG for handballers would say...
Click to read more »regarding a publication. Colonel finn (talk) 13:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Exactly, If other articles...
Click to read more »PROD was contested by the article's creator with an argument based on WP:OTHERSTUFF. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:17, 27 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »helping a new editor understand those criteria and they have cited WP:OTHERSTUFF as a reason why their draft should be accepted into mainspace. Given that...
Click to read more »to us at this point in time. Comparing the athlete to others is an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Mkdwtalk 03:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Gunter Singer (edit |...
Click to read more »of any secondary sources means that the show is not notable. (While WP:OTHERSTUFF tells us not to base the existence of an article on X on the existence...
Click to read more »editors personally prefer one style, not a cause for deletion. Similarly WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a deletion rationale. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:39, 27 January 2021...
Click to read more »see why this one is any less notable." That doesn't quite get beyond WP:OTHERSTUFF. My original point was: "Non-notable digital-only mini-release that has...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:49, 9 September 2014 (UTC) Keep I don't really want to argue WP:OTHERSTUFF, but 'list of years' articles exist in most media forms here, including...
Click to read more »against the "opponent". So your WP:OTHERSTUFF argument falls short. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF in regard to Wikipedia:Userboxes#Potentially...
Click to read more »--JonBroxton (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC) I don't know about WP:OTHERSTUFF. This one meets WP:GNG. ----moreno oso (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »run counter to the Wikipedia:Other stuff exists (or in this case, WP:Otherstuff like this got deleted.) Am I misunderstanding Wikipedia:Precedents here...
Click to read more »because redirects are WP:CHEAP. Nom's arguments otherwise are WP:OTHERSTUFF. ~Kvng (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »October 2007 (UTC) Comment That argument is dismissed at WP:WAX aka WP:OTHERSTUFF. Accounting4Taste 18:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC) Comment I'm sure it will...
Click to read more » The result was delete. Ignoring the "keep" !votes that boil down to OTHERSTUFF, which is not a policy-based rationale, I find a consensus to delete....
Click to read more »individual entries for individual episodes of other TV shows but, per WP:OTHERSTUFF, that does not mean that this article needs to exist. It may very well...
Click to read more »suggest any policy-based reasons for keeping, basically WP:GHITS or WP:OTHERSTUFF. miealaraisa perhaps suggests an WP:IAR argument with "I see high value"...
Click to read more »discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Keep under WP:OTHERSTUFF of Category:Community bicycle programs. I think on a whole these ventures...
Click to read more »fishy). NVO (talk) The fact that articles exist on other models is a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. The fact that the model has sales and has been reviewed doesn't...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC) Keep, at the risk of falling foul of WP:OTHERSTUFF, all the other tournaments do have stats pages, and while this one is...
Click to read more »something that could also be said of the subject. That's not an attempt at WP:OTHERSTUFF; I mention it because I wouldn't be strongly against a merge to Kapla...
Click to read more »Clarityfiend (talk) 20:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC) That is an invalid argument (WP:OTHERSTUFF). However, Wikipedia:External_links/Perennial_websites#IMDb says what...
Click to read more »notability, such as the long-standing Brad Sucks article (I know, WP:OTHERSTUFF). ~Amatulić (talk) 00:45, 12 August 2011 (UTC) Indytronic Records and...
Click to read more »article. The arguments to keep were not convincing (WP:ITSUSEFUL, WP:OTHERSTUFF). I would be willing to restore the article for the purpose of merging...
Click to read more »this is a notable name and the only reason he provided is essentially WP:OTHERSTUFF in that, "Fotios is not a family name - it is a first/given name. Therefore...
Click to read more »Biden”? And WP:NOTCENSORED is completely irrelevant to userbox content. WP:OTHERSTUFF is also a terrible argument— just nominate the Trump boxes if you think...
Click to read more »Survivor: South Pacific. Also, the fallacious argument outlined in WP:OTHERSTUFF is not grounds for keeping an article — "just pointing out that an article...
Click to read more »but I am not finding any profiles of her. On the other hand, to cite WP:OTHERSTUFF wrongfully, this one is better than many other shameless artist bios out...
Click to read more »of notability of the current crop of product articles. This is the WP:OTHERSTUFF argument but in this case I think it is applicable. We are never going...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:33, 24 November 2011 (UTC) Your first point is the nullified WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Like I have already stated, it goes against the spirit of the...
Click to read more »and also not notable. -User:Scoutstr295 That may well be true but WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a very good reason for keeping this article. If you think something...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. --Article editor (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF.--十八 00:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Delete non-notable per the current sources...
Click to read more »that still meet GNG - heck, I've written quite a few of them. That WP:OTHERSTUFF meets GNG. This doesn't. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:23, 19 January...
Click to read more »make him notable. Ice (talk) 22:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. If what you say is true, those articles should also be nominated for...
Click to read more »(events)#Inclusion criteriaWP:ROUTINE, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:ADVERT. And see also: WP:OTHERSTUFF.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC) Delete The tour...
Click to read more »You reasons for the AfD read like a cross between WP:IDONTLIKEIT & WP:OTHERSTUFF BTW. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 04:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC) Keep per the...
Click to read more »(This is also a one-off run). Though I definitely want to avoid an wp:OTHERSTUFF argument, there is one that could be made as we do have multiple bots...
Click to read more »comment added by 97123 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF and besides, Neil Melanson is incredibly notable on account of training...
Click to read more »large collection of snack food articles on Wikipedia", which is an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, and this is in no way comparable to well-known Japanese snack...
Click to read more »--Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Comment- Keeping WP:OTHERSTUFF in mind, just for information I would like to bring deletion discussions...
Click to read more »November 2008 (UTC) Keep per WP:PORNBIO. The nom's rationale is partly WP:OTHERSTUFF. This article has nothing comparable to the issues with Kimberly Devine...
Click to read more »notability is directed on the league. Arsenalkid700's argument is merely WP:OTHERSTUFF. Bzweebl (talk) 16:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC) I still stand by what I...
Click to read more »pass WP:N or WP:WEB. The comment above appears to be a combination of WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:ITEXISTS, and WP:ITSNOTABLE. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:27, 16 November...
Click to read more »be found? Richard☺Decal (talk) 14:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Richard WP:OTHERSTUFF , WP:ALLORNOTHING , WP:ARBITRARY (top 100 coins) are arguments to avoid...
Click to read more »note, I'm not making the OTHERSTUFF argument that "this list is more useful than List of Pokémon characters." THAT'S an OTHERSTUFF argument. Let's look at...
Click to read more »deletion too, although that's not a reason for keeping this one (see WP:OTHERSTUFF). Stephen Turner (Talk) 08:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Delete and salt...
Click to read more »Bbny-wiki-editor (talk) 01:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC) Please avoid WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC) Please go play...
Click to read more »Lambert. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:OTHERSTUFF and John Pack Lambert. --TheSandDoctor Talk 04:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »meet the notability guidelines. - for the Mashed potato argument, see WP:OTHERSTUFF in Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions - Epinoia (talk)...
Click to read more »it were clear, I wouldn't have nominated it. Further, the fact that WP:OTHERSTUFF exists is not an indicator for this article to be deleted. Per nom, if...
Click to read more »August 2017 (UTC) Busguy9, that in and of itself won't do it. See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC) If it cant be kept...
Click to read more »9 March 2009 (UTC) Perhaps, but that is not a valid argument per WP:OTHERSTUFF. A porn star must either meet WP:PORNBIO, WP:BIO, or WP:GNG to be on here...
Click to read more »S._President.--Broter (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC) That's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Do you have an argument based on policy?- MrX 11:45, 21 May...
Click to read more »its opening in the context of food at Disney. Without getting into WP:OTHERSTUFF, it's also worth noting that it appears to be the only Disney restaurant...
Click to read more »PROD was contested by the article's creator with an argument based on WP:OTHERSTUFF. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC) Keep it's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, but he's more notable than Travis McHenry in basically every...
Click to read more »is no reason to single this one out for deletion. And don't quote WP:OTHERSTUFF to me. In this case it seems that this has become the accepted, standard...
Click to read more »Romanian killed in an aircraft crash notable? At the risk of invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF, do we have an article on the first Israeli killed in an aircraft crash...
Click to read more »completely discounted both WP:VAGUEWAVEs (one keep, one delete) and the WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments relating to her predecessor don't hold much weight either. I...
Click to read more »All objections (and there are not so many) appeal in some form to WP:OTHERSTUFF, which is not a good argument to object deletion. Having said that, I...
Click to read more »that WP:OTHERSTUFF is not one of the best arguments, but it is a valid one in this case. As the essay (yes, not policy) which includes WP:OTHERSTUFF says...
Click to read more »(Talk:Dundee Culture) that less notable similar articles exist. See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC) Delete. The article...
Click to read more »given. DGG (talk) 22:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC) Whilst being wary of WP:OTHERSTUFF, I feel allowing this article to exist would allow articles on oyster...
Click to read more »Goldsztajn (talk) 01:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF: "If you reference such a past debate, and...
Click to read more »there being other examples of lengthy lists of quotes on Wikipedia (a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument). The prose elements of this article should be merged back into...
Click to read more »'Tribute act' Mrs. Wolpoff's reason is so bad, a venomous mix of IDL and OTHERSTUFF and trace amounts of other things, I thought I needed to weigh in. Insufficient...
Click to read more »the article. The 'help requests' at this point have devolved to pure otherstuff arguments, and complaints that the article is not being given sufficient...
Click to read more »you will need to base it on Wikipedia policies. I suggest you read WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:42 to understand what types of rationale will be considered. --...
Click to read more »moderated and has a place in WP. Whereas spurious list haters who use WP:OTHERSTUFF as a self-perpetuating argument does not. What happens after decimating...
Click to read more »22:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Keep The argument to delete is about WP:OTHERSTUFF; Notability of fiction is tricky but this will have substantial viewing...
Click to read more »also have little more content. See 180 (drink). (BTW, I do know about WP:OTHERSTUFF ! ) --Kudpung (talk) 04:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Comment Show me where...
Click to read more »is not a justification for keeping this one. You may like to read WP:OTHERSTUFF. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »amsterdam.fan (talk) 17:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC) @Ajax.amsterdam.fan: WP:OTHERSTUFF. Those articles maybe pass WP:GNG, which this article does not. Nehme1499...
Click to read more »Btrain3 (talk) 18:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC) We have a very good essay about OTHERSTUFF as it is not a valid objection (and, in fact, you are welcome to put Blackbaud...
Click to read more »would be confusing, etc. Secret account 15:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:NOTINHERITED. Doctorfluffy (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »on Wikipedia. Onefortyone (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:CFORK. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC) What...
Click to read more »sources or significant awards; the creator's argument for keep is WP:OTHERSTUFF. 9Nak (talk) 11:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC) Delete as the article fails to...
Click to read more »they are represented fairly). Additionally, both accounts refer to an OTHERSTUFF argument: "This article has the same structure as many other company pages"-Ingrid...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV even if the status quo has been relaxed. This is outlined in WP:OTHERSTUFF. Mkdwtalk 17:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC) Delete as still nothing actually suggestive...
Click to read more »contribs) 21:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC) I'm not sure how relevant that is per WP:OTHERSTUFF, but yes, there is the well-populated Category:Storm chasers. There are...
Click to read more »buildings with articles. B137 (talk) 00:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF is an instance of an argument to avoid in deletion discussions, not a...
Click to read more »back in 2013 and the second has only three votes with arguments like WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ITSINTERESTING. Dronebogus (talk) 11:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »Smuckers It has to be good 21:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC) First, see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Second, this is a fine example of a season-by-season summary. And this...
Click to read more »Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 13 February 2011 (UTC) Delete Baring the invalid WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, no citations have been provided. Only link is to 1st party source...
Click to read more »Delete per WP:SIGCOV. Accounts wanting to keep this page point to WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:LOTSOFSOURCES, and WP:V without explaining why this particular charter...
Click to read more »one for Jiangmen too. Tony0517 (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF--Jac16888 Talk 00:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC) [1]][[User:Tony0517|Tony0517]...
Click to read more »almost all blue links. Rmhermen (talk) 14:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF is generally not a valid reason for keep.-GrapedApe (talk) 15:53, 27 April...
Click to read more »that other articles exist is not an argument for keeping another:see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Secondly, this is not a dessert or type of food: it is a proprietry brand...
Click to read more »that don't have articles than ones that do. In any case, it's simply WP:OTHERSTUFF.TheLongTone (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2014 (UTC) Perhaps. But responding with...
Click to read more »the WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. If it makes you feel better I can nominate them all now, Seriously don't acknowledge WP:OTHERSTUFF then make otherstuff arguments...
Click to read more »wide known doesn't count) like all other pages are meant to have. See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »deleted). Second Skin (talk) 12:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC) Please read WP:OTHERSTUFF — comparing Ghost Bath to articles that do and do not exist is neither...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep There is no valid basis for deleting this article. Not to WP:OTHERSTUFF but seasons of virtually every other professional motorsports league has...
Click to read more »WikiProject Finland). —Ruud 12:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC) That's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument you are making, nothing to do with WP:BEFORE. Sionk (talk) 13:11...
Click to read more »more notable than that. FuFoFuEd (talk) 14:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC) As JamesBWatson points out...
Click to read more »is the size of the city a determining factor? Not to run afoul of WP:OTHERSTUFF, but would the same logic be used against Cole's Pacific Electric Buffet...
Click to read more »largest city in New York State is not a significant statistic. Avoid WP:OTHERSTUFF. KidAd • SPEAK 03:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC) Redirect to Mount Vernon, New...
Click to read more »notable references (mainstream media, news outlets?) on the article. And WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't a reason to keep an article. alex.muller (talk) 11:55, 29 December...
Click to read more »TWL) A non-notable list and no other such lists exist (I think the WP:OTHERSTUFF argument is valid in this case). BTW, the ref given is not a reliable...
Click to read more »lack of notability. Love of Corey (talk) 21:53, 3 May 2021 (UTC) ^ WP:OTHERSTUFF. If Jana Sanchez is being used to support another page's notability, you...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep There is no valid basis for deleting this article. Not to WP:OTHERSTUFF but seasons of virtually every other professional motorsports league has...
Click to read more »them off one by one. Smartyllama (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING. I strongly contest that every country in the world's...
Click to read more »for the same reasons.--Arxiloxos (talk) 04:46, 15 May 2012 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Me-123567-Me (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC) This nominator has a history...
Click to read more »use OTHERSTUFF, doesn't matter. A deletion request is open for everyone's take. Respect them.Citybuild122 (talk) 16:46, 7 August 2018 (UTC) OTHERSTUFF is...
Click to read more »see me recommending delete (especially because of arguments like the WP:OTHERSTUFF above) but this one appears to have a link that, while it goes to a forum...
Click to read more »republish it. OneTennisEditor (talk) 18:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. If you are that frustrated about the existence of Assumpção's article...
Click to read more »author himself removed the speedy (quickly reverted) and offered a WP:OTHERSTUFF defense on the talk page, an "independent" editor with no other edits...
Click to read more »05:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC) C'mon Dream Focus, I think you know that's WP:OTHERSTUFF. WP:VG isn't the authority on video game-related articles, so why shouldn't...
Click to read more »probably before WP:ATHLETE reached its current form? Also, look at WP:OTHERSTUFF David V Houston (talk) 12:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC) Delete, no secondary sources...
Click to read more »13:57, 23 December 2011 (UTC) Weak keep At the risk of falling into the otherstuff trap, I'd point out that some of Sigma Chi's other founders have their...
Click to read more »dead 06:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Notability is not inherited, and the OTHERSTUFF still doesn't demonstrate that this list of stats has been the subject...
Click to read more »of Transformers articles. JJ98 (Talk) 19:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. - The Bushranger One ping only 14:09, 14 October 2013 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »That article has nothing to do with the notability of this one. see WP:OTHERSTUFF. However, I have tagged it to be merged to the Champions Tour page and...
Click to read more »to Star Trek.--AlainV (talk) 03:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Delete- WP:OTHERSTUFF isnot a valid argument. This article does not attempt to establish notability...
Click to read more »fals under WP:OTHERSTUFF. Just hope the 20 users a day are not from staff college. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC) Otherstuff is as valid...
Click to read more »others to decide, but at least redirecting it as well would avoid the WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »up for deletion. TheMesquito (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Also I have in fact been looking at those very pages and may nominate...
Click to read more »enough information to justify that. (As for the other scooters, see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Just because some scooters are notable doesn't automatically make every...
Click to read more »MBisanz talk 00:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Delete per notability and WP:OTHERSTUFF -> WP:INN. tedder (talk) 00:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Comment is there any...
Click to read more »articles because there notable. JJ98 (Talk) 23:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:ITSNOTABLE. - The Bushranger One ping only 13:46, 14 October 2013...
Click to read more »--AirportExpert (talk) 17:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)AirportExpert Bearing in mind WP:OTHERSTUFF...a lot of those are high schools, and high schools are generally presumed...
Click to read more »article has a couple external links, but no citations. Outside of being an OTHERSTUFF argument, it's age is irrelevant. I was able to find some articles mentioning...
Click to read more »like any other video game page on Wikipedia", you may like to read WP:OTHERSTUFF. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »usual WP practices for coverage of fictional characters in TV series. WP:OTHERSTUFF notwithstanding, I don't see much point in whittling away one small piece...
Click to read more »the meantime the fact that all the other colleges have articles is WP:OTHERSTUFF and should probably also not factor into this. I'm sure some of the other...
Click to read more »--Weatherman41 (talk) 14:28, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Comment. Please read WP:OTHERSTUFF. This is not usually a compelling argument. Article subjects should be...
Click to read more »this one. The remaining "keep" vote immediately above is based on an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument involving a class of about 20,000 potential articles, many of...
Click to read more »Wiki443556 (talk • contribs) 09:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC) That argument is WP:OTHERSTUFF, which is something to be avoided. However, that particular flash is notable...
Click to read more »probably enough for the subject to meet WP:CREATIVE. Without trying to otherstuff it, there's certainly an easier case to make for that than for the many...
Click to read more »after all. JuJube (talk) 07:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Perhaps review WP:OTHERSTUFF. --ZimZalaBim talk 14:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Well, from what I read...
Click to read more »was added by K.O.T. (talk • contribs). Oh, please, your argument is WP:OTHERSTUFF. Who said that "German clone is not claimed to violate any Wikipedia rules"...
Click to read more »was delete. Both of the keep votes in this discussion were textbook WP:OTHERSTUFF votes. No one refutes the claim that this episode does not meet WP:GNG...
Click to read more »impression they were treated badly. All of that is irrelevant here. About OTHERSTUFF: "In Wikipedia discussions, editors point to similarities across the project...
Click to read more »your contributions) doesn't have any grounding in Wikipedia policy. WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a real argument to keep. Each article stands or fails on its own...
Click to read more »https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1440783321999467 but one isn't enough. WP:OTHERSTUFF exists. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC) A quick Google...
Click to read more »article are trustworthy. Steven Walling • talk 18:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF The fact that other articles don't meet notability guidelines (and should...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Remember WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Damiens.rf 19:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Delete, per nom. Quite aside from WP:OTHERSTUFF, JuJube's analogy is poor...
Click to read more »nomination is not helped by the fact Randomcrunchycookies is making WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments. Getting on an IDMb list of an obscure category with only a...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep There is no valid basis for deleting this article. Not to WP:OTHERSTUFF but seasons of virtually every other professional motorsports league has...
Click to read more »pages Curler1200 (talk) 23:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC) WP:ITSNOTABLE, WP:OTHERSTUFF. Please explain how this is notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:19...
Click to read more »Phightins! 20:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC) Not sure how constructive using WP:OTHERSTUFF is going to be to either keep or delete.—Bagumba (talk) 23:55, 7 April...
Click to read more »Torc2, I hope that you are not willfully misapplying what WP:OTHERSTUFF actually says. OTHERSTUFF does not assert "that pointing to precedence is faulty."...
Click to read more »Development Index, closed as "merge", but the keep votes seem to largely be WP:OTHERSTUFF. With consensus here, I will likely do some bulk AFD nominations or merges...
Click to read more »you're falling back on WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments now? Tarc (talk) 12:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC) No, please read WP:OTHERSTUFF. I not vote because other articles...
Click to read more »argument "if x is deleted we MUST delete y" is not a valid one (see WP:OTHERSTUFF). We debate these articles here, not other ones. Reminding us that this...
Click to read more »do is more or less an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Rorshacma (talk) 23:42, 14 February 2020 (UTC) I understand what WP:OTHERSTUFF means, but you can't apply...
Click to read more »followers?JPBarrass 16:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC) You might want to look at WP:OTHERSTUFF. NawlinWiki 16:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC) Notability standards are different...
Click to read more »topic. At the risk of having an anology go off the rails, and having WP:OTHERSTUFF thrown at me... We have articles on baseball pitches such as the split-finger...
Click to read more »article or any other similar ones that get AFD'ed. I'm also aware of WP:OTHERSTUFF. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 16:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC) Redirect to Greg Howe#Discography...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC) Comment: WP:OTHERSTUFF aside, if this article is unencyclopedic, then so is most of Category:Lists...
Click to read more »is arguably a precedent that they are. I realize this sounds like a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, but this objection could apply to the vast majority of a huge...
Click to read more »--TommyBoy (talk) 08:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC) Keep for now There is a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument here which should be avoided as there is nothing stopping anyone...
Click to read more »the above advise since it is against policy which does not recognize WP:OTHERSTUFF as a valid argument in deletion decisions - each topic stands or falls...
Click to read more »France. —МандичкаYO 😜 03:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC) This is based on WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:SYNTH. Are there any RS actually saying this is a significant population...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep There is no valid basis for deleting this article. Not to WP:OTHERSTUFF but seasons of virtually every other professional motorsports league has...
Click to read more »unreliable! --78.105.249.166 (talk) 00:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a good reason to retain an article. Keep I have added Secondary...
Click to read more »than delete altogether. I understand where you're coming from, but WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't very strong. It isn't about the topic (which I personally find interesting)...
Click to read more »the page stay. It will grow more for sure. Thanks. - Anonymous user WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a reason, feel free to AfD Twice page as well. Snowflake91 (talk)...
Click to read more »for web-series or television shows, which is an argument covered in WP:OTHERSTUFF. Each page is evaluated on its own merits, and the fact other pages exist...
Click to read more »know that, since the one link in the article is dead? Have you read WP:OTHERSTUFF? Have you read WP:GNG? JJB 16:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC) Delete Agree with...
Click to read more »No it doesn't. There is only one change for 2016 detailed. Also - WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Falcadore (talk) 01:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Keep is cited and will evolve...
Click to read more »can see this being filled out with techniques/methods etc. Slightly WP:OTHERSTUFF, but biography is an example of what discography could be considered as...
Click to read more »proven to have notability in their own right. I also refer Mimi C. to WP:OTHERSTUFF as the presence of multiple similar existing articles has no bearing on...
Click to read more »Acmjournal 17:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC) The existiance (or not) of WP:OTHERSTUFF has no bearing on whether or not this article should be kept. - The Bushranger...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WP:OTHERSTUFF is generally not a convincing argument to keep an article. Also, comparing...
Click to read more »no articles of a similar type for other country. While that is the WP:OTHERSTUFF argument it is something that can be taken into account in this case....
Click to read more »Earlier AFD keep votes do not address WP:GNG and amount to WP:ILIKEIT/WP:OTHERSTUFF. Two book sources linked ([1], [2]) in earlier AFD do not amount to WP:SIGCOV...
Click to read more »Nokia phones seem to have articles; take to afd instead". This isj ust OTHERSTUFF, and acknolwedges the "Wikipedia is not a catalog" problem. Several other...
Click to read more »coverage to the character. That's simply not the case with this article. WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't a convincing argument at all in this case. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:33...
Click to read more »Poems of borns (talk) 04:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC) La La La. a) see WP:OTHERSTUFF. and Wikipedia is not Trip advisor.TheLongTone (talk) 18:01, 18 January...
Click to read more »check this, for example.Caith Sith (talk) 17:35, 7 January 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC) Comment - I want to...
Click to read more »mainstream media may take some work though. At the risk of invoking an otherstuff argument, I am having a hard time seeing how we delete this, considering...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment Aside from the general rule about the WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, this "otherstuff" argument fails in that there was never any doubt that the...
Click to read more »(which also has local council support, and an official website etc). WP:OTHERSTUFF is an argument to avoid at AfD. Widefox; talk 22:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »InfiNeuro the state of other articles unless GA/FA is not relevant (WP:OTHERSTUFF). ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 18:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Keep and expand...
Click to read more »of them would not pass WP:MUSIC in my opinion. This to me is beyond WP:OTHERSTUFF, and suggests that in fact the broad community consensus has changed to...
Click to read more »plays for.Simione001 (talk) 06:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC) Delete - WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid reason for keeping an article. This player fails both WP:NFOOTBALL...
Click to read more »is. Otherwise, there's nothing here that passes WP:GNG. Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF for arguments to avoid during notability discussions. TimTempleton (talk)...
Click to read more »one fails our guidelines where the others don't? It's not so much an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument as a query of consistency. Should this be bundled with nominations...
Click to read more »reasonable demonstration as to why the Artist is notable. With the obvious WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments discounted, it is not demonstrating to me why the artist is...
Click to read more »a few of 'em, are bluelinked. On that basis, yes yes I know about WP:OTHERSTUFF, we are clearly considering that Ambassadors, at least British ones, ARE...
Click to read more »articles about prominent foreign actors. I realise I'm gonna be told WP:OTHERSTUFF, but the notability of the subject of this article transcends a hell of...
Click to read more »9 October 2009 (UTC) Comment. Notability is not inherited. Plus...WP:OTHERSTUFF. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 03:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Redirect & Merge. Article...
Click to read more »Jeremias (talk • contribs) 13:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC) The existiance of WP:OTHERSTUFF does not reflect on whether or not this article should be kept. - The...
Click to read more »I realize there's an OTHERSTUFF argument that could be made w/r/t other lists for other cartoons, but I don't think OTHERSTUFF is strong enough on its...
Click to read more »outcome as most rebuttals by the keep camp are overall quite weak (WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments, arguments that don't address whether the sources are actually...
Click to read more »argument that there are articles on similar attractions is invalid per WP:OTHERSTUFF. Searching for additional sources just turns up the same kind of routine...
Click to read more »wp:music#5? duffbeerforme (talk) 03:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC) WP:ADHOM, WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:HOUND. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Participating...
Click to read more »cromulent article. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:08, 12 April 2011 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFF aside, the hits from the news link above do not add up to "significant...
Click to read more »1970s and 1980s.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. The question at AfD is: Does this crime have WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk)...
Click to read more »the list as belonging there, and that argument has not been made. The "otherstuff" arguments do not really work, and in fact we have numerous list pages...
Click to read more »contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. See WP:OTHERSTUFF and slippery slope fallacy. See also churnalism. Guy (Help!) 17:19, 23...
Click to read more »original research. Edison (talk) 20:55, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Delete. WP:OTHERSTUFF might well need to be deleted, but that is irrelevant; there is no claim...
Click to read more »tabloid-y. Sandstein 09:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC) Comment I have to invoke WP:OTHERSTUFF here; we have articles on a lot of European pretenders with lesser claims...
Click to read more »hear, but you're making a textbook "other stuff exists" argument (cf. WP:OTHERSTUFF). AFD is all about applying Wikipedia's rules to individual cases. You...
Click to read more »may only mean that no one has gotten around to deleting it yet, see WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:13, 29 January 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »November 2013 (UTC) I'll get out of the way on this, per David G. and the OTHERSTUFF argument I have just managed to make. Carrite (talk) 01:29, 11 November...
Click to read more »than Qantas destinations. But it is an inappropriate drectory and WP:OTHERSTUFF is no reason to keep; perhaps the whole Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Airline...
Click to read more »—Bagumba (talk) 01:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Ignoring all the irrelevant WP:OTHERSTUFF remarks, the American basketball player is referred to mononymously has...
Click to read more »WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS was not a keep reason and is now going after the WP:OTHERSTUFF root and branch), I don't think this sportscaster meets and notability...
Click to read more »NotReallySoroka (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Your first paragraph is WP:OTHERSTUFF and so irrelevant. The rest of it still doesn't actually answer my questions...
Click to read more »if more are found. As for articles about other teams, please read WP:OTHERSTUFF. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »organisation a commercial advantage over others (an unfortunate artefact of WP:OTHERSTUFF). -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:42, 20 October 2012 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »cricket records#Individual records (bowling). At the risk of invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF, this is no different than the featured list List of international cricket...
Click to read more »added 19:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC) Thanks for your reply, please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Go Phightins! (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2012 (UTC) In any event an article...
Click to read more »transwikied (or occasionally some other outcome) can form. Secondly, see WP:OTHERSTUFF - just because A.N.Other article exists has no relation on whether this...
Click to read more »Liefting (talk) - 20:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC) See comment below re: OTHERSTUFF– Lionel (talk) 04:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC) What is a priori encyclopedic...
Click to read more »bovair1988 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF as to why that argument fails. Hasteur (talk) 19:47, 24 November 2010...
Click to read more »any such independent references for this company. Also please read WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:UPANDCOMING. Thank you. --Finngall talk 20:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 14:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Comment regardless of history, the creator's experience level or any WP:OTHERSTUFF, all articles must meet WP:GNG and this one doesn't and I'm not seeing...
Click to read more »Bondrake (talk • contribs) has made few edits outside this topic. WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid reason for keeping an article. Additionally, you're confusing...
Click to read more »List-class article.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC) @Zxcvbnm, that's WP:OTHERSTUFF. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »nominator's reason is a classic, Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions WP:OTHERSTUFF, "The nature of Wikipedia means that you cannot make a convincing argument...
Click to read more »feels a bit dodgy. Lithopsian (talk) 14:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Praemonitus (talk) 22:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Delete No RS to establish...
Click to read more »sure what Epiphyllumlover is talking about, but it sounds a lot like WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Comment If this schools...
Click to read more »notability guideline substantiating this claim, this amounts to nothing but WP:OTHERSTUFF, not a reasoned, substantiated argument for keeping. As to "partial copyvio"...
Click to read more »lines of WP:ILIKEIT and each article is judged on its own merit, see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Notability is not inherited across characters. The GNG only cares about...
Click to read more »nor why does this meets OTHERSTUFF (just because I mentioned other opinion polling articles? Then you are also OTHERSTUFFing yourself when comparing this...
Click to read more »(UTC) I haven't really considered it. Regardless, it sounds like an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. If you think this category should be kept, defend it by explaining...
Click to read more »more wins and coverage than the others. I would personally reject WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments such as those raised by the nom and above delete !voters that...
Click to read more »one, as many articles exist on Wikipedia that probably shouldn't—see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Mz7 (talk) 04:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC) Delete - WP:OSE isn't a valid...
Click to read more »1948 for deletion, but it shouldn't make much difference here per WP:OTHERSTUFF. StAnselm (talk) 02:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC) delete a lot of article is...
Click to read more »but I think the "other subnational areas are covered" may fall under WP:OTHERSTUFF? Please correct me if I'm wrong on that. Otherwise though, this article...
Click to read more »WP:Assume good faith Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to discuss an AfD WP:OTHERSTUFF WP:Ownership of articles Wikipedia:Disruptive editing Wikipedia:No personal...
Click to read more »reason to keep it. You cant say that other articles exist as argument, WP:OTHERSTUFF. QED237 (talk) 11:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) As above, can you explain how they are notable? Also, please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Just because there are other articles alive (for now), that doesn't mean...
Click to read more »notable as any of the billions of local television news anchors we have otherstuff articles about. On to actual reliable sourcing, though, there is this...
Click to read more »principled. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC) Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Someone holding a can of beans for a photograph is very different than...
Click to read more »192. Pointing to other articles is not a valid keep rationale per WP:OTHERSTUFF unless those articles have been through an AFD also. Nor is it sufficient...
Click to read more »isn't. The Real Libs-speak politely 12:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't sufficient here. The article makes no claim of notability other...
Click to read more »article. --Farix (Talk) 18:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Point out that WP:OTHERSTUFF is an essay, not policy, so please do not wave it in front of newbies...
Click to read more »college. At this time, I'd have to say this is too early. Aside: It's WP:OTHERSTUFF, but it's more likely younger brother LaMelo Ball is notable, even if...
Click to read more »existence of other articles about singles from the same source that is a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument which holds no water. If evidence of charting or some other notability...
Click to read more »for deletion. Preceding unsigned comment added by User:AusLondonder WP:OTHERSTUFF exists, again? Well, List of 2015 box office number-one films in Australia...
Click to read more »of this, I would reconsider. Regarding the Knicks–Nuggets article, WP:OTHERSTUFF might apply. I havent looked at that brawl, but it might be more significant...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid reason for keeping something. We have notability rules...
Click to read more »Hurley (talk) 07:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC) WP:ITSUSEFUL, WP:ITSFUNNY, WP:OTHERSTUFF. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »chapters have articles doesn't mean that this one is notable. Please read WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:GNG--GrapedApe (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »16 more country lists. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. Timothytyy (talk) 07:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC) Those who yearn for erasure...
Click to read more »org/wiki/See_Monkey_Do_Monkey) Richard Fury (talk) WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:OTHERSTUFF. Can I also ask whether if you have a personal interest in the subject...
Click to read more »Comment. The 'keep' arguments have presented some justification based on WP:OTHERSTUFF, and the articles mentioned above seem to all be disseminated from the...
Click to read more »notability make per WP:ORG. I'm sorry to disagree with you Andy, but WP:OTHERSTUFF etc. etc. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Keep I agree...
Click to read more »list of minor bus lines is notable. While I generally don't employ WP:OTHERSTUFF exists arguments, a list of actual minor bus lines in England seems to...
Click to read more »Tomas e (talk) 20:49, 6 February 2013 (UTC) Delete - Most of the WP:OTHERSTUFF Agne27 mentions are appropriate lists based on geographical features....
Click to read more »notable than Adam Horowitz. ImTheIP (talk) 19:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC) Keep – Romirowsky is...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Please reference WP:GNG. As for the rest of your rant, see WP:OTHERSTUFF. KidAd (talk) 00:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC) And still no substantive argument...
Click to read more »relevant. Please note WP:OTHERSTUFF. -- Mikeblas 04:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Comment. I think it's disingenuous to cite WP:OTHERSTUFF here - Petri Krohn was...
Click to read more »video game music? Clarityfiend (talk) 07:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF. -Thibbs (talk) 12:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC) That's a good point. The fact...
Click to read more »it, and discuss this based on its own merits, notability etc. See WP:OTHERSTUFF. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 04:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Keep—I can attest...
Click to read more »comment added by Evar678 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. What separates it from those is that I found the TISFAT Zero article...
Click to read more »understand the OTHERSTUFF point, but when I wrote that there are huge numbers of articles on NPR and BBC reporters it wasn't supposed to be an otherstuff argument...
Click to read more »discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Keep Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. This article has problems, but reliable coverage exists in enough depth...
Click to read more »third-party coverage (as brought up in the first AfD) is irrelevant per WP:OTHERSTUFF. Simply put, to be considered significant coverage in reliable sources...
Click to read more »history. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC) There's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument to keep it; it compares well to a lot of the chains on List of...
Click to read more »sources that establish notability? As for the second part please read WP:OTHERSTUFF. Ridernyc (talk) 07:16, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Keep - per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES...
Click to read more »to apply windows vienna should be taken off wiki!! Delete Even if WP:OTHERSTUFF was a valid reason to keep it (which it isn't), this article is not about...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) 12:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC) Comment Have you read WP:OTHERSTUFF and Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Products_and_services...
Click to read more »been removed. Jandcast (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:SEWAGE. If you find lists of songs as useless as this one, please...
Click to read more »substitute for improvement. I know my argument is somewhat against WP:OTHERSTUFF, however, if this article fails WP:PLOT then the others in the above category...
Click to read more »political party criteria, right? --J2xF (talk) 18:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »sentence blurb), that I was reminded of when I put it up for AFD, I know WP:OTHERSTUFF but it is an example here. Ask me about air Cryogenic air (talk) 18:42...
Click to read more »"arguments to avoid" outlined at Wikipedia:Other stuff exists and WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Orlady (talk) 02:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Yes, it probably is. There...
Click to read more »contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF as to why this type of argument is not apprpriate in deletion discussions...
Click to read more »GaryColemanFan, the AFD result for Air Boom does not have a bearing here due to WP:OTHERSTUFF and the fact the teams are markedly different in their prominence (and...
Click to read more »guideline for fictitious organizations? At risk of seeming to make a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, we do have articles for comparable organizations within fictional...
Click to read more »enough. Bearcat (talk) 03:49, 15 April 2018 (UTC) Keep. I know that WP:OTHERSTUFF is hardly a strong reason to keep, but comparing the category with Shakespeare...
Click to read more »106.219.24 (talk) 03:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC) I could direct you to WP:OTHERSTUFF but actually Pythagoras's theorem is a good example. Despite the theorem...
Click to read more »the Gaza Strip". - HyperGaruda (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF Merely because articles on the Islamization of Turkey, Islamization of...
Click to read more »Filipino artists, many of whom are covered here. I don't mean that as an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, I just mean that if we're looking to equitably cover contemporary...
Click to read more »didn't single it out, I hadn't noticed the category. Let's not ignore WP:OTHERSTUFF, then. Why are most of these articles on integral meridians here? And...
Click to read more »article and as such should be independent. If there is ever a case for WP:OTHERSTUFF, this would be one of them. Take a look at the examples here. If it were...
Click to read more »as a list. We have articles like this for dozens of networks. I know OTHERSTUFF isn't usually a winning AfD position, but in this case it is. If you disagree...
Click to read more »page. AskohlerOpus111 (talk) 04:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^WP:OTHERSTUFF. KidAd (💬💬) 03:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC) This is a fair rebuttal of HandIsNotNookIs'...
Click to read more »wanted the other one deleted too....I absolutely hate essays, but WP:OTHERSTUFF CTJF83 chat 21:38, 1 November 2010 (UTC) I'm not too sure about quoting...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Comment Nom's ban on mentioning the rest of Wikipedia aside, OTHERSTUFF is a reasonable attempt to provide some specificity to vague rules, and...
Click to read more »of Transformers articles. JJ98 (Talk) 20:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. - The Bushranger One ping only 14:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »- Biruitorul Talk 14:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC) Delete - Unfortunatly, WP:OTHERSTUFF is not an argument that can be used for inclusion - I agree that the article...
Click to read more »that's probably true, but irrelevant to this discussion. Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Raven1977 (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »Commission. Seymour was five years old. Comparing Brennan to Seymour is an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. As the text you quoted says, it's not about specific role but...
Click to read more »claiming that WP:NALBUM doesn't apply to EPs (it does), and invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF. So now we have to come here. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 00:03, 18 June 2023...
Click to read more »Although I, personally, greatly appreciate and consider precedent, WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a good argument. AfD guidelines say that any particular discussion...
Click to read more »Mohammed Ahmed Alauna. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:58, 24 July 2015 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC) Keep As per WP:GNG. The case...
Click to read more »different assessors. I'm not in a position to make anything but an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument here so I'll trust others to make an accurate assessment. ~Kvng...
Click to read more »notable as a diocese. StAnselm (talk) 23:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC) So, WP:OTHERSTUFF. It is plausible to me that dioceses have significantly more power, and...
Click to read more »articles should be deleted? (This is a rhetorical question. Don't quote WP:OTHERSTUFF now – I'm just using this as an example to show that the argument as presented...
Click to read more »indicator of notability. Being "at least 20% as notable as Braid" is WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:CRYSTAL. --Soetermans. T / C 14:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »notability. Edward321 (talk) 15:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC) Keep based on WP:OTHERSTUFF only. If that is not a good reason, delete. --Shuki (talk) 00:15, 17 January...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC) Struck duplicate !vote. See also WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Delete per nomination...
Click to read more »"non-notable"? -- User:Helge123 12:38, 10 august 2009 (GMT+2) Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Sander Säde 10:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC) So when will the company become...
Click to read more »a fairly significant presence in mid-Michigan. While others scoff WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a very good reason, if we're keeping pokeman characters this is...
Click to read more »zeros are essentially a random selection set. PROD removed with a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument citing FIFA World Cup milestone goals, which IMO also should...
Click to read more »merely articles the concerts and not about Motek. I'd appreciate to see 'otherstuff' of similar impressarios/organizations that might change my mind in the...
Click to read more »• (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF notwithstanding, most Experimental musical instruments have been used...
Click to read more »page. The result was merge to WWE as well as Endeavor (company). The OTHERSTUFF arguments were given very little weight as was any snark about people...
Click to read more »WP:GNG does not exclude local coverage. The above arguments about WP:OTHERSTUFF are irrelevant. Wikipedia is WP:NOTPAPER, there is no space limit. If...
Click to read more »stats sites. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Again see WP:OTHERSTUFF and the WP:NOSTATS is discussed below, but I will reiterate, nostats specifically...
Click to read more »matches. Deor (talk) 11:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Fulvous is really otherstuff, but personally I feel that Fulvous is a dab masquerading as a colour...
Click to read more »"these commercial entities exist". Nor does the lack of existence of WP:OTHERSTUFF matter here (it could be that Sydney and Melbourne should also have shopping...
Click to read more »articles not meeting the standards is not an excuse for this one, see WP:OTHERSTUFF. If you genuinely believe other articles do not meet the standards you're...
Click to read more »LibStar (talk) 00:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Delete - per WP:Org and WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Kudpung (talk) 01:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »Peridon (talk) 12:00, 23 November 2010 (UTC) Dons nerd hat WP:OSE and WP:OTHERSTUFF Catfish Jim & the soapdish 13:55, 23 November 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »that the rationale highlighting past similar AFDS could be considered WP:OTHERSTUFF. Servite et contribuere (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2025 (UTC) I highlighted...
Click to read more »and rename as list per above. That said, my primary rationale is that OTHERSTUFF exists, so if we have lists of foo billionaires of various sorts, this...
Click to read more »stuff). Perhaps he has other accomplishments not mentioned? Also, WP:OTHERSTUFF for review. Maybe his brothers should be deleted also but I haven't looked...
Click to read more »while the aforementioned articles have not been. That's irrelevant per WP:OTHERSTUFF, which states you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on whether...
Click to read more »criterion applies here. Other-stuff-has-not been-deleted is is, well, WP:OTHERSTUFF. This is the place to establish consensus on whether a particular page...
Click to read more »(synopsis, lip sync [including lip stic choice] and queens placement). WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid reason for keeping the article. It re-hashes the information...
Click to read more »"articles on other local politicians exist" is not relevant. Given WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:OSE guidelines. Subject's are notable on their own merits. Not...
Click to read more »00:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC) Keep Wikipedia is WP:NOTPAPER and thus WP:OTHERSTUFF is a poor argument. If this is more appropriate as a section of another...
Click to read more »neuroscientist, i.e. WP:OTHERSTUFF. Braydonowen (talk) 10:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC) If that's what you think, then you misunderstand what OTHERSTUFF is about. --Tryptofish...
Click to read more »Comment there's also Norfolk Accident Rescue Service (NARS) (from the WP:OTHERSTUFF exists pile, but useful for context here). Widefox; talk 22:57, 10 May...
Click to read more »WP:SYNTH and Point of View (POV) and don't be susceptible. Read the essay WP:OTHERSTUFF and take what you can from it. It's not policy, but it is widely quoted...
Click to read more »not present much of an argument and it is countered quickly with a WP:OTHERSTUFF or whatever the acronym is here. If I were the closing admin here (I understand...
Click to read more »This task will change {{Wikisourcelang|<lang>|otherstuff}} into a {{Wikisource author|lang=<lang>|otherstuff}} call. {{BAG assistance needed}} valid request...
Click to read more »that has meaning to someone unfamiliar with the series. Also, note WP:OTHERSTUFF. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 02:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC) Strong Delete...
Click to read more »highway, and general consensus is that they are notable - yes, it's WP:OTHERSTUFF, but in this case it's comparable. If that's not acceptable, though, a...
Click to read more »comment added by Matty p s (talk • contribs) 13:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. pʰeːnuːmuː → pʰiːnyːmyː → ɸinimi → fiɲimi 16:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Titan50 (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Please see WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:OTHERSTUFF. Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Redirect to The Vines. Limited...
Click to read more »being created. "But what about [some other music project here]" – See WP:OTHERSTUFF. The existence of something on WP doesn't mean that everything vaguely...
Click to read more »delete a list of songs. Pinkkeith (talk) 15:56, 30 July 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. That list is just terrible list-cruft and certainly fails WP:SAL too...
Click to read more »circuit). Not just for the sake of it. If you want to engage in an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, so will I. Las Vegas Street Circuit is comparable to the Bern...
Click to read more »Delete spam. Doesn't meet notability. And can we have a list of that OTHERSTUFF that exists, so we can review its notability as well? WhatamIdoing (talk)...
Click to read more »in the world List of most expensive paintings This is not invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF, this is illustrating that NOTYELLOW cannot be used indiscriminately against...
Click to read more »added 08:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC). Consider reading WP:ITEXISTS and WP:OTHERSTUFF. Erpert (let's talk about it) 08:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC) Keep. This...
Click to read more »one is. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 12:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF but yeah, it probably isn't needed. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:21, 18 February...
Click to read more »March 2019 (UTC) While we're listing invalid reasons for deletion, WP:OTHERSTUFF. To show notability of a list, there must be coverage that discusses the...
Click to read more »lot of lists of other notable artists' songs; dismissing that as a mere OTHERSTUFF observation is a rather facile way to approach the question of when it...
Click to read more »But anyway the notability of other articles is not at issue here per WP:OTHERSTUFF. I see another reference has been added to this but that is actually to...
Click to read more »years ago, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnes Milowka. This is not an OTHERSTUFF reference; the rationales of AfD editors at the previous discussion are...
Click to read more »reason to. It is complete fancruft, and your argument there is just WP:OTHERSTUFF. It's not really notable, and could probably be merged back into San Andreas...
Click to read more »available about is very less compared. Also other existing pages are WP:OTHERSTUFF. Vestrian24Bio 02:51, 28 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »competition. --SuperJew (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Consistency with WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid reason to keep a useless navigation template. --Rob Sinden...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC) Yes, not a problem. The reason that OTHERSTUFF comparison is often problematic for companies is that NPP is a filter...
Click to read more »policy compliant reasons, whereas both the keepers have just relied on OTHERSTUFF. JBW (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »careers have been eliminated at Afd discussions (yes, I know about WP:OTHERSTUFF). I don't think mere participation at annual events this large shows notability...
Click to read more »exist or not should generally be avoided in deletion discussions per WP:OTHERSTUFF. Seagull123 Φ 16:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Reply Hey Seagull123. I think...
Click to read more »Comment I don't watch the show and I am wary of being beaten with the WP:OTHERSTUFF club but is there any reason why this episode specifically fails notability...
Click to read more »dead 18:04, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Notability is not inherited, and the OTHERSTUFF still doesn't demonstrate that this list of stats has been the subject...
Click to read more »fall under that because it's not "loosely associated". not to make an otherstuff argument, but consensus, e.g. this search, seems to be that lists of roads...
Click to read more »24 June 2012 (UTC) Keep per Mr. Schmidt. At the risk of sounding WP:OTHERSTUFF, I'm not sure how this is any less notable than any YouTube personality...
Click to read more »with consensus to keep doesn't make sense. It looks to follow from an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuckservative. A couple of...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC) Your argument is fallacious: WP:OTHERSTUFF. Qworty (talk) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fails all of the...
Click to read more »all the other squadrons of the Swiss Air Force" sounds a lot like an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument and doesn't hold water. As for WP:MILUNIT, it is an essay that...
Click to read more »articles which aren't this one (WP:OTHERSTUFF works both ways). SSSB (talk) 09:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC) OTHERSTUFF is deletion advice, not advice on splitting...
Click to read more »Jim red91 (talk) 14:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC) a classic example of WP:OTHERSTUFF.TheLongTone (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS can...
Click to read more »establish notability. (37 films is not a remarkable number in porn.) WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid argument either. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 26 November 2011...
Click to read more »notability. However, bringing up ports 80 and 22 is little more than WP:OTHERSTUFF, unless a similar and relevant discussion was made regarding those and...
Click to read more »whilst the others are kept. Florentyna (talk) 14:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF. Also you have not demonstrated how this topic meets a notability guideline...
Click to read more »guidelines. Your comment about Quantum carpet is covered, for example, by WP:OTHERSTUFF. The more important point is that we do not have an article about everything...
Click to read more »