This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
editor directly. Potential candidates may opt to close or withdraw their ORCP assessment request at any time. Polls are normally closed without any closing...
Click to read more »The following is the list of candidates requesting polling feedback at WP:ORCP who subsequently ran for adminship....
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:ORCP/SWP:ORCP/S Wikipedia:RFACANDIDATESEARCHWikipedia:RFACANDIDATESEARCH This is an area where potential poll candidates can be vetted. To...
Click to read more »both posted to WP:ORCP. While I understand a CU investigation would refuse to reveal that the sock is located where the puppeteer is, ORCP isn't somewhere...
Click to read more »candidate poll (ORCP) in September; I sought feedback from longtime editors and RfA regulars to figure out where I was standing. My ORCP was short but went...
Click to read more »{ "description": "List of participants at ORCP", "targets": [] }...
Click to read more »nominate me. I invited Fram (see reply to question 3) to comment at the ORCP. Fram rated my chances as 2/10, and kindly stated “Their editing has markedly...
Click to read more »the question at User talk:Ronjohn#Your RFA, either. Anyway, given that the ORCP was closed as "not ready", I think that the RfA should be deleted for now...
Click to read more »echo chamber. The massive disconnect between ORCP and the actual results of RfA discussions means that ORCP should now be taken with a pinch of salt the...
Click to read more »theme from their responses was acclaim for the optional RFA candidate poll (ORCP), a development championed by Anna Frodesiak that began in October 2015....
Click to read more »can also ask for a brief evaluation by various experienced editors at WP:ORCP first. If the users on the list below think you would make a good administrator...
Click to read more »Airport against naming conventions. Both users have nominated themselves at WP:ORCP. master, sock The way the two users sign is also the same. So, clear case...
Click to read more »following unanimous positive feedback at the Optional RfA candidate poll (ORCP). 331dot from the State of Maine made his first edit in 2012. A regular Teahouse...
Click to read more »(UTC) I got slammed pretty hard in a recent AFD (and not too much later at ORCP) for making the exact-same argument. I'm not sure that view has consensus...
Click to read more »(beta) · CSD log · PROD log · no prior RfA) It was suggested that I try ORCP. My main interest is dealing with text copyright, especially via CopyPatrol...
Click to read more »deletion review). The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:User-orcp. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:35, 9 October 2017...
Click to read more »whilst also remaining clear that their behaviour was unacceptable. In my ORCP back in 2021 I disclosed all of the "bad" conflicts I think I had been in...
Click to read more »poll (ORCP). You've commented there more than once so I'd like to know why you didn't visit there before this self-nom. A: Hi Chris. I think ORCP is a...
Click to read more »the RfA standards are or directing you to where you could find out. See WP:ORCP or WP:RFAADVICE for further advice. ~ Rob13Talk 05:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »"headhunted" for about a year, and has just run a extremely positive poll at WP:ORCP with a near-unanimous consensus that he should give RfA a go. So let's do...
Click to read more »Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Support I think the ORCP gives a pretty good summary of Ealdgyth, which is extraordinarily positive...
Click to read more »seen ONUnicorn around but hers was not a name I knew well until she took an ORCP and I'm thrilled that after some more discussion she's decided to take the...
Click to read more »is my estimate of your chances at RfA. Please note that according to the ORCP recommendations, this does not constitute an in-depth assessment, nor is...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC) Oppose – you really needed to run by WP:ORCP first... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC) Moral Support...
Click to read more »numbered incorrectly, at "2", instead of 1, and this is because the user got ORCP confused with RfA (which isn't good). The closing date is also incorrect...
Click to read more »candidate poll (ORCP) in September; I sought feedback from longtime editors and RfA regulars to figure out where I was standing. My ORCP was short but went...
Click to read more »creation. If you follow all the advice in this ORCP (such as improving your AFD stats and writing a GA), and ORCP again in 6 months, you will be a much stronger...
Click to read more »concerns about your work at OTRS. One year later you put yourself through WP:ORCP and received a lot of feedback inquiring about "why you want this so bad"...
Click to read more »originally discouraged Red Phoenix from immediately running at his first ORCP request a few months back since I felt he was a bit weak in his primary proposed...
Click to read more »things to say about Roger that haven't already been said at his previous RfA, ORCP poll, or talk page, but I'll try to summarise the highlights. Roger has a...
Click to read more »previous RfAs) Hello, I'm qedk. Firstly, I would like to say that I find ORCP a good place to get critique from, so I appreciate all feedback, and if you...
Click to read more »this is a better alternative for expressing interest than posting at WP:ORCP, for example, which has seen many discussions about how it hurts qualified...
Click to read more »theme from their responses was acclaim for the optional RFA candidate poll (ORCP), a development championed by Anna Frodesiak that began in October 2015....
Click to read more »become a rarity and AFAICS, this is probably due to projects such as WP:ORCP, some comprehensive guidance, and blatant warning templates on the transclusion...
Click to read more »head that I always appreciate hearing from. You can see the signs at his ORCP from nearly two years ago - this is a long time coming. Nick always makes...
Click to read more »RfA is a bit embarrassing. How could I have thought that, having done an ORCP whose result I did not accept, I could undertake an RfA shortly afterwards...
Click to read more »characterize my first RFA run as nervous and hesitant. In hindsight, having WP:ORCP around when I ran would have probably been beneficial to see where I stood...
Click to read more »from Ritchie333 5. Two months ago you, filed a poll (your second) at WP:ORCP, in which I gave you 4/10 and warned you about over-zealous CSD tagging,...
Click to read more »between ORCP and RfA, or just for this candidate? – Juliancolton | Talk 16:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC) To my knowledge, applicants regularly go from ORCP to RfA...
Click to read more »close down the ORCP, and restart Wikipedia:Editor review. Actual admin candidates never use ORCP. There was one candidate who posted at ORCP, and everyone...
Click to read more »get some feedback on my chances of passing an RfA around a year after my ORCP closed. Additional questions from Banedon 23. How would you explain your...
Click to read more »I feel you'd pass RfA. I wasn't concerned about past conduct at the last ORCP and I remain not concerned, especially with the time that has past I think...
Click to read more »make me confident he would make a fine administrator. In his November 2015 ORCP discussion Ansh received quite positive feedback, with the only substantial...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Support. Great to see someone whose WP:ORCP I commented on and supported is now at RFA a month later. Best of luck. –Novem...
Click to read more »As some of you are probably aware, EvergreenFir has filed two polls at WP:ORCP. She has taken all feedback on board in good grace, and at the most recent...
Click to read more »is a very frequent issue. They don't run, because they've been through WP:ORCP and told how wrong they are. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:40, 19 September 2021...
Click to read more »troublemakers away. After recent disappointment with some of the nominations at WP:ORCP, several people were happy to see Kosack put their name up for adminship...
Click to read more »17:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC) Support - Generally, for what I said at his ORCP. This is an editor who has experience dealing with content and provides in-depth...
Click to read more »the community wishes for you to improve. There isn't an equivalent to WP:ORCP for 'crats; should there be? -- Avi (talk) 02:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC) Avi, I'm...
Click to read more »"Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia". That you ignored the ORCP who said "don't run, you won't pass" and that you frame adminship in terms...
Click to read more »minute mark. There are some other issues. I don't see you following the ORCP advice. Despite Beeblebrox'x comment, the autopatrolled issue goes beyond...
Click to read more »unfortunate (and perhaps more due to the goading he received mistakenly at ORCP from some of the then inexperienced editors, including yours truly). He's...
Click to read more »a Optional RfA Candidate Poll (ORCP) prior to submitting their candidacy? Option A - No (current) Option B - Yes - ORCP must have been created during the...
Click to read more »worries me is that he recently out of the blue put Patient Zero through an ORCP poll. He endorsed it but then asked me to withdraw it a day later. Class455...
Click to read more »wait period as an improved or alternative version of WP:ORCP myself (and personally I like ORCP since it gave me the confidence to have a run for the real...
Click to read more »discussed offwiki. Secondarily, it's just inviting users to have a revolving WP:ORCP/pre-RFA at their talk page. The longer between a user publicly announcing...
Click to read more »Backlog cleared. No comment on your RfA ambitions but have you tried WP:ORCP? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC) @Guy Macon:, before...
Click to read more »his ORCP in December it doesn't instill any confidence in me. Oshwah says he is taking things to heart, but, well take this comment from his 2015 ORCP; I...
Click to read more »admin score (beta) · CSD log · PROD log · previous RfAs) Let's see what ORCP has to say, noting that I'm considering a run either in mid-OctoberNovember...
Click to read more »to stay away from ANI, which I used to do (until I was told myself in an ORCP I needed more experience there, so now I do participate there), but that...
Click to read more »reiterate Extraordinary Writ's worry that drawing greater attention to WP:ORCP-like polling will simply identify skeletons in the closet that sink future...
Click to read more »and it's largely why their most recent RfA failed (they were counselled at ORCP to avoid an RfA, advice duly ignored). If FWTH can demonstrate a significant...
Click to read more »TonyBalloni comment came in response to a longstanding frustration with the ORCP process on Tony's part. So it's another case of a deep-seated behind-the-scenes...
Click to read more »nominating, are interested in joining a flight at that time reach out. Beyond WP:ORCP, Lee Vilenski, Nosebagbear, and I have also offered to give feedback to candidates...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) The oddest thing to me is why this couldn't have stayed at WT:ORCP. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Because it's so funny...
Click to read more »in the past. I believe from their general demeanor as such places as his ORCP poll that FWTH is a young child, and as such I'd be willing to entertain...
Click to read more »happy about how a situation which Rzvas{{noping}} criticized me for at my WP:ORCP turned out; I was involved with mediating between some newish editors who...
Click to read more »03:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC) @Beyond My Ken: Obviously, this isn't your ORCP, but I thought I'd note I don't consider this one discussion to be a dealbreaker...
Click to read more »in his RfA in 2012 (eg: oppose #3) and I brought up some examples at his ORCP about six months ago. Most recently, I have seen him getting into an unnecessary...
Click to read more »Earwig/afc-helper.js 25 0 659 User:Frietjes/masspurge.js 24 15 660 User:Enterprisey/orcp-helper.js 24 11 661 User:Music1201/QuickLinks.js 24 10 662 User:Nardog/CopyCodeBlock...
Click to read more »the top of each section on the archive page. 56 30 orcp-helper (source) Tool to give ratings at WP:ORCP. 24 11 req-helper (source) Tool for Wikipedia:Requested...
Click to read more »not excuse it. When another poor archive name was pointed out to me at an ORCP, I requested deletion per USERPAGE, along with "i see dumb people" and a...
Click to read more »WP:RFAADVICE and the candidate would have also received this feedback at WP:ORCP, or by seeking an experienced editor familiar at RFA to nominate them. Until...
Click to read more »PrimeHunter (talk) 20:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC) Although Wikipedia:ORCPWikipedia:ORCP redirects to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll...
Click to read more »with content, and some more NPP work, and then consider filing a poll at WP:ORCP about this time next year. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:00, 31 March 2017...
Click to read more »Lourdes 10:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC) A: Samtar publicly gave his views at ORCP[4] at the beginning of December, and any serious conversation regarding a...
Click to read more »end up a little like WP:ORCP, with people coming up with unduly negative points in the discussion phase, but worse than ORCP because it would be right...
Click to read more »for maintenance work in general. I'm aware of TonyBallioni's view of WP:ORCP but while I think it's not such a bad initiative, it's also not used as often...
Click to read more »that at their ORCP in March, they indicated a desire to run in six months. It's been two. Concerns were raised about NOTYET in the ORCP, but they were...
Click to read more »fatal, in my view. RfA candidates, particularly those who go through the ORCP process as Cameron did, surely must look back at recent RfAs for what works...
Click to read more »June 2019 (UTC) Not that it's relevant now but every WMFLabs page (links on ORCP) wouldn't work for me yesterday either, Only lasted 10-20 minutes tho. –Davey2010Talk...
Click to read more »soon but I've been asked for RfA a few (very few) times. I thought I'll try ORCP in case I ever want to run in the near future. All criticism is acceptable...
Click to read more »the project. Bradv 05:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC) Oppose: Not sure why the ORCP wasn't linked here; the comments received by the editor back in September...
Click to read more »Frietjes 25 Feb 2026 15 24 orcp-helper Enterprisey 2 Dec 2019 Quicker rating at WP:ORCP. A userscript to make giving ratings at WP:ORCP easier. Hint: It's much...
Click to read more »Chris Troutman (talk) 02:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)edit:As my comments at ORCP are about my estimate of the community consensus, I'll withdraw my comments...
Click to read more »(UTC) I got slammed pretty hard in a recent AFD (and not too much later at ORCP) for making the exact-same argument. I'm not sure that view has consensus...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Editor review, but no longer. Perhaps the closest thing is WP:ORCP because if there are any problems with your editing at all, someone’s sure...
Click to read more »SPI work. Your record in User:Ivanvector/CSD log looks good. The previous ORCP was in December, 2015. I can't get the AfD statistics tool to run at the...
Click to read more »scenes) actions, you could pop this text somewhere in your userpage. {{User-orcp|Sanyam.wikime}} It will create the following line there: Sanyam.wikime (talk ·...
Click to read more »their hand at editing and such for (many) more months before returning to ORCP for another polling appraisal. (non-admin closure) --IJBall (contribs • talk)...
Click to read more »there is a further step to create the CSD log. The template used here in the ORCP poll has an entry called 'CSD log' (if you have one set up) so many of the...
Click to read more »331dot's comment. You should not go through with an RfA at this time. WP:ORCP is open to you if you want feedback on your 'readiness'; personally, my impressions...
Click to read more »demonstrate how he might perform as an arbitrator. If this were a request at ORCP (which of course it isn't), my boilerplate suggestion would be: 'Keep up...
Click to read more »to expect one or two more RfA's in the coming months as well thanks to WP:ORCP and some discussions there... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:08, 15 December...
Click to read more »you? If so, I would advise against it I'm afraid; and if you're not, an ORCP is premature. I'm sorry that your last time here didn't attract much feedback;...
Click to read more »most impressed by is how seriously he took the feedback he was given at ORCP three years ago: to take one example, rather than just writing a GA or two...
Click to read more »Additional question from Chris troutman 10. A year ago you asked about RfA at ORCP. You couched your request as "one of very few non-admin ArbCom candidates"...
Click to read more »troutman 7. I note that not only are you a self-nom, you also didn't use WP:ORCP. Why? A: I chose to nominate myself firstly because there are a handful of...
Click to read more »feedback on your own likelihood of passing an RfA you may want to try WP:ORCP. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 00:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC) I assume he wants...
Click to read more »me, nor is the lack of content work. For the same reason's I put out at ORCP, Anarchyte would clearly be a net positive for the project. His AFD and RM...
Click to read more »others decide. Hope that gives you some helpful feedback. Maybe consider WP:ORCP for pre-election feedback. I think we did have a link to it on the call for...
Click to read more »said Zebedee (talk) 08:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Oppose - Had they gone to ORCP they would've got a 0/10 and with good reason - No experience at all with...
Click to read more »Support - happy to see your name here, I was surprised when you turned up at ORCP recently as I thought you were already an admin. As for concerns about bias...
Click to read more »but I think you've shot yourself in the foot here a bit. I do remember the ORCP, where I suggested some more substantial content work might improve your...
Click to read more »areas, and also for editors considering adminship, sort of a self-driven WP:ORCP. I'm speaking very broadly and generally of course: there would be quite...
Click to read more »applying! Ajraddatz (talk) 15:53, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Support as per WP:ORCP discussion. Lately, the backlogs at WP:RM have gotten quite severe, so we...
Click to read more »be intimidating having to "pick" one (or a few) of the names on the list. ORCP has a similar vibe but also has some hat collector stigma (at least if you...
Click to read more »12:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC) I offered to nominate Ivanvector during his ORCP in October and I am honoured to have that opportunity now (albeit redundantly)...
Click to read more »this grilling took place so I could look at it. I thought it might be at ORCP but Ritchie didn't comment on that occasion. Instead, the candidate was given...
Click to read more »something a suitable, experienced editor owes to the project. Hence this ORCP. Should I run, and if yes, do I stand a chance? –♠Vami_IV†♠ 23:43, 11 March...
Click to read more »July 2016 (UTC) Some of this is MyRFA-type-commentary and some of this is ORCP/meta-type-commentary: I've made a conscious effort since recent times (2014...
Click to read more »Support. I agree that this seems like a qualified candidate. My research at WP:ORCP didn't turn up anything concerning. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:35, 21 May...
Click to read more »bureaucrat? This user has asked a question at an RfA, and responded to an ORCP for Insertcleverphrasehere. I would trust SoWhy to close RfAs as a bureaucrat...
Click to read more »otherwise-strong record and make a good admin. Essentially, I'm looking at it like an ORCP where I'm reasonably confident the prospective candidate would immediately...
Click to read more »handful of decent articles. Once done, you could check things out via WP:ORCP. You may be closer to it than you think. If that could be of interest to...
Click to read more »move this to Talk:Ashok Attri (diplomat)#Break so we don't clutter this ORCP. –Novem Linguae (talk) 07:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC) @Novem Linguae. Unless DreamRimmer...
Click to read more »not? A: Good question! There was some discussion about my AfD work at the ORCP, as you note, and I found the feedback I got there helpful. As I mentioned...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Hi all, me yet again - I've ungraciously butchered Enterprisey's orcp-helper into a tool to help EFM's, administrators and other editors respond...
Click to read more »not excuse it. When another poor archive name was pointed out to me at an ORCP, I requested deletion per USERPAGE, along with "i see dumb people" and a...
Click to read more »thoroughly review his contributions before commenting. @TOTT underwent an ORCP during November of last year (about 7 months ago). They received some good...
Click to read more »running for adminship and probably will never poll at ORCP anymore fwiw — the feedback at ORCP is (was) valuable for the critique and that is primarily...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Mandating ORCP was discussed in the workshop phase (Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/RFC workshop#WP:ORCP as a requirement), but...
Click to read more »process runs on AGF and willingness. I must remark, not very many folks at WP:ORCP any time recently. Of Archive 16, about 5 are non-serious queries (Carolina...
Click to read more »obvious that the consensus here is that this RfA is very premature. Your ORCP said much the same thing, and (sorry to be blunt) I can't help but think...
Click to read more »I don't like the self-nomination, when they were offered a nomination at ORCP. And while I think ASJ has done some great content creation, that is (to...
Click to read more »As Schwede66 put it in an email a few years ago after one of my old WP:ORCPs: RfA is like a job interview but with a panel of 250 interviewing you for...
Click to read more »thanks for the advice! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 01:13, 26 August 2025 (UTC) ORCP tends to bring out nitpicks. Sometimes !voters don't really care about these...
Click to read more »their suitability for adminship then they should stand at RFA, initiate a WP:ORCP and/or explicitly ask for it. The limited public commentary is one of the...
Click to read more »focus on negatives. So far not one of these candidates had passed a prior ORCP. None of them were going to pass the RFA anyway. This trial hasn't really...
Click to read more »the tools. Just look at all the people telling her to go for it over at ORCP! Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC) Candidate, please indicate...
Click to read more »more", missing thousands of other good candidates. Or folks posting at WP:ORCP, missing all the folks who don't post there. Or asking admin friends for...
Click to read more »thought about running in the near future, I'd highly recommend posting at WP:ORCP and/or asking the willing prospective nominators. They're both friendly low-stress...
Click to read more »from others is completely compatible, and indeed recommended (see eg. WP:ORCP) prior to an RFA. Your comment about introspection and humility implies that...
Click to read more »whilst also remaining clear that their behaviour was unacceptable. In my ORCP back in 2021 I disclosed all of the "bad" conflicts I think I had been in...
Click to read more »reconf RFAs to think they should be restricted, but what about a lighter ORCP-like process (maybe even in the same place) where fewer editors can indicate...
Click to read more »most impressed by is how seriously he took the feedback he was given at ORCP three years ago: to take one example, rather than just writing a GA or two...
Click to read more »would be a sort of midway point between an ORCP and the RfA process itself, but perhaps more likely than ORCP to correctly anticipate the RfA outcome. There...
Click to read more »